Camille’s On a Rampage

Check this out.

Naomi Wolf, author of The Beauty Myth, adviser to Al Gore (as in Ms. “Wear Earth Tones” Wolf), has, 20 years after the fact, accused Harold Bloom, her adviser at Yale, of sexual harassment.

This is ridiculous.

It’s stupid, it’s hypocritical, it’s wrong. 20 years? Ms. Feminist Stand-up-for-myself? Some guy put his hand down your pants, and you can’t seem to ever ever ever get over it? You are haunted years later?

Harold Bloom was responsible for your Rhodes scholarship, having written you a glowing recommendation. You shut your mouth when it was convenient to do so, and now you come clean?

This is why I also scorned the feminist establishment’s lifting up Anita Hill into some kind of idol. If the woman were sexually harassed, she did not speak up, she did not come forward – and she benefitted fully from Clarence Thomas’ attentions – moving up the ranks. And NOW? Now she comes forward?

Sorry. There are PLENTY of women who REALLY fight sexual harassment, who lose their damn jobs because of it … who put their reputations, their futures on the line, in order to stand up for what is right. THOSE are the women we should admire. Not Anita Hill.

Camille Paglia, who never loses an opportunity to bash Naomi Wolf, has come forward and raged about this latest incident (Wolf has demanded that Yale University apologize to her).

Camille Paglia, who traded blows with Ms. Wolf in the early 1990’s over their radically different views on female sexual power, said she was no longer at war with Ms. Wolf, but was “shocked” to learn of Ms. Wolf’s accusations against Mr. Bloom, who is a long-time mentor of Ms. Paglia’s.

“I just feel it’s indecent that if Naomi Wolf did not have the courage to pursue the matter at the time, or in the 1990’s, and put her own reputation on the line, then to bring all of this down on a man who is in his 70’s and has health problems—who has become a culture hero to readers in the humanities around the world—to drag him into a ‘he said/she said’ scenario so late in the game, to me demonstrates a lack of proportion and a basic sense of fair play,” said Ms. Paglia, who is professor of humanities and media studies at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, where she said she helped institute that university’s sexual-harassment policies in the 1980s.

“At the beginning of the 90’s, people said, ‘Oh, Naomi Wolf, this great thinker,’” said Ms. Paglia. “But what she’s managed to do in 10 years is marginalize herself as a chronicler of teenage angst. She doesn’t want to leave that magic island when she was the ripening teenager. How many times do we have to relive Naomi Wolf’s growing up? How many books, how many articles, Naomi, are you going to impose on us so we have to be dragged back to your teenage-heartbreak years? This is regressive! It’s childish! Move on! Move on! Get on to menopause next!”

How do you really feel, Camille?

This entry was posted in Miscellania and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Camille’s On a Rampage

  1. Dan says:

    I think I dislike her almost as much as I dislike that horrid ‘Prozac Nation’ girl.

  2. red says:

    Elizabeth Wurtzel. I always thought she was kind of an idiot, but then I realized that she was actually evil when, 2 days after September 11, she said that she didn’t know what the big deal was – and that the towers falling was a “kind of art”.

    She lived 2 blocks away, too. She’s such a self-absorbed idiot.

  3. When I was at Brandeis they hired Anita Hill as a women’s studies professor, to which a lot of people replied: “how can they justify that, when there’s a 50/50 chance she’s a complete liar?”

    The Wolf allegation is weird, although I do have some respect for her. I have none for that psychopath Elizabeth Wurtzel.

  4. red says:

    I read The Beauty Myth and did not think it was half-bad. I could not get through Promiscuities though … too self-obsessed.

  5. red says:

    Oh, and about Wurtzel – who has always turned me off – I read a very funny caustic piece in … I think it was Salon – analyzing the narcissistic tone of Wurtzel’s acknowledgements pages. Her acknowledgements pages in her books grew longer and longer, and more and more wacked … with more and more TMI going on.

    Like: “To so and so … who propped me up against the wall at Limelight, after holding my head as I vomited out 3 weeks worth of meals … thanks for the love and the light and the compassion … You help me see what God is…”

    I made that up, obviously, but that was how she would acknowledge people. It was gross.

  6. David says:

    “…thanks for the love and the light and the compassion…You help me see what God is…”

    You are so damn hilarious.

  7. Dan says:

    I thought God was a six-pack.

    Evidently Ms. wurtzel begs to differ.

  8. red says:

    David -

    I do have to admit that there are times when i get quite a kick out of myself.

  9. MikeR says:

    I think this Naomi Wolf harassment claim is different and worse than Anita Hill’s. Clarence Thomas was seeking a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, and as a result invited close scrutiny of his character (though I do agree that Ms. Hill does not deserve to be elevated to iconic status for her testimony).

    By making a sexual harassment claim two decades after the fact, and after her having accepted the now elderly man’s patronage, Wolf is trivializing the concept of sexual harassment. She needs to take Don Henley’s advice and get over it.