-- in a fit of utter triviality on this serious day:
that this woman has a SERIOUS problem.
STOP. GETTING MARRIED.
What, sweetheart - you can't f*** someone without getting married to that person? Is that it?
Then either stop f***ing people or STOP. GETTING. MARRIED.
Serious psychological problems.
And her "unidentified friend" has a serious issue with double negatives.
Somehow I have managed to get as far as I am in life without getting married and divorced 5,000 times. How is that possible??? I don't know.
I repeat: there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with this woman. And when you add Gigli on top of it, you just want to weep.
"Marriage is a sacred institution. It is not to be taken lightly, and should be understood it is a moral and religous experience between a man and a woman."
President Bush.
Yup. Moral. Sacred. Man. Woman. And this woman is an idol to millions of young teenage girls. Can anyone tell me what the hell is happening in the United States?
Posted by: Alex at June 7, 2004 12:54 AMAlso: love it how gay people are supposed to be tainting the sacred-ness of the institution when we have straight boneheads messing it up left and right.
Posted by: red at June 7, 2004 9:59 AMWhen you reach a certain "class" marriage loses its sacred meaning and becomes either a business deal or a personal indulgence.
The divorce will come, oh, say, in 6 months. Or less if Affleck comes crawling around. What a geek.
Posted by: Barry at June 7, 2004 10:18 AMRed, you asked how you could have gotten so far in life without getting married and divorced 5000 times? Simple -- you've got class.
Posted by: The Aceman at June 7, 2004 10:22 AMThere are plenty of people of that class who get married and stay married. Not sure what your point is??
I think there is something wrong, specifically, with HER. She can't just date someone, she has to turn it into some big drama, she MUST get married ...
I love to talk about J-Lo as seriously as if she were Alan Greenspan.
Posted by: red at June 7, 2004 10:22 AMAceman: i really don't think this has anything to do with class ...
I think it's sort of like this: I see no problem with just dating people. I do not need to get married, in order to solidify a relationship. At least not before its time. I am an old woman compared to J-Lo. I have dated many men. Many have proposed to me. But ... I have a SELF, I have an INNER COMPASS. She dates someone for 3 months and then MUST get engaged.
I am very interested in this phenomenon, as a psychological study.
Like I said: I think J-Lo is as grave a topic as Alan Greenspan.
Posted by: red at June 7, 2004 10:24 AMBen Affleck = most relieved man in America.
Marc Anthony = on the "A List" of every divorce laywer in the country.
Ha!
I would add to that something like this:
J-Lo's manager = Mortified. How to spin this one ...
Posted by: red at June 7, 2004 11:35 AMConversely, Alan Greenspan's marriage to Andrea Mitchell is what belongs on Page Six of the NY Post...right? I mean, there HAS to be some kind of sleazy scandal or impending breakup or somtehing there. ;-)
Posted by: Dave J at June 7, 2004 11:50 AMI was going to get married this afternoon, but decided to go out for a cheeseburger instead. Really she's going to be a 3 time loser before she's 35.
Posted by: Pat W at June 7, 2004 12:05 PMMaybe she's going for the record.
What is the record?
Elizabeth Taylor has to be in double digits by now.
Posted by: Rob at June 7, 2004 12:22 PMI think Zsa Zsa Gabor may have beaten Liz Taylor. Let me look it up
Posted by: red at June 7, 2004 12:23 PMSheila,
I love you right now for even bringing up the names Elizabeth Taylor and Zsa Zsa Gabor. If I had a prize, I'd give it to you.
Posted by: Alex at June 7, 2004 12:26 PMHAHAHAHA
Posted by: red at June 7, 2004 12:27 PM