December 7, 2006

Yes i said yes I will Yes

Hours of fun can be had with the Ulysses concordance (thank you, Mimi Smartypants for linking to it).

I kinda can't stop playing around with it. I mean, obviously it is an awesome tool for scholars ... but I just like surfing thru it, randomly.

Obsession? (I thought I would start off with an appropriate word, seeing as the concordance itself is the most obsessive - and beautiful - thing I have ever seen) 2 occurrences:

foot (on our shore he never set it) only his cloacal obsession. He gazed (from Aeolus)

disintegration of obsession, acquisition of correct Italian (from Ithaca)

Crimson 9 occurrences.

Bastard 8 occurrences

Pillow 10 occurrences

Nonsense 4 occurrences

Bathroom (of course - had to go there) 1 occurrence

Shakespeare 38 occurrences

I find this strangely relaxing.

rhododendrons 7 occurrences

Whoever created this deserves a big fat kiss. And also a quizzical look, like: "Uhm ... why?" Both would be acceptable. But I would give the kiss first.

Kiss 46 occurrences

Posted by sheila | TrackBack
Comments

It makes me tremendously sad that Mimi Smartypants does not have comments on her blog because it thwarts my ability to tell her how much I love her ohmigod she is hysterical.

(Or maybe it's for the best.)

Posted by: Lisa at December 7, 2006 5:06 PM

I know - that's probably all I would ever say in a comment on her site: YOU ARE SO FUNNY! HAHAHAHAHA

which I imagine would get tiresome.

But fuggedaboutit, she's hysterical.

Posted by: red at December 7, 2006 5:12 PM

Her image today of Nora randomly freaking out merely because it's night? hahahaha

Posted by: red at December 7, 2006 5:58 PM

I did 'jaunty'. Shows up four tasty times.
Jingle jaunty jingle.
Jiggedy jingle jaunty jaunty.
Call name. Touch water. Jingle jaunty. Too late. She longed to go.

What fun

Posted by: steve on the mountian at December 7, 2006 6:42 PM

Steve - ha!! I was thinking you'd like that.

Posted by: red at December 7, 2006 7:20 PM

360 occurrences of the word Yes.

Seems appropriate, no? Yes?

Posted by: red at December 7, 2006 10:05 PM