“These kids only want to talk about acting method and motivation. in my day all we talked about was screwing and overtime.” — Robert Mitchum


Robert Mitchum, Cannes 1954, photograph by Leo Mirkine

It’s his birthday today. The greatest.

Excerpt from Are You Anybody? An Actor’s Life, by Bradford Dillman

For the past fifty years Robert Mitchum has been captivating filmgoers with his sleepy demeanor. He was the first actor to be jailed for marijuana, and it’s no state secret he’s enjoyed a cocktail or two in his time. But his toughness is no pose.

Before beginning a film with him, Henry Hathaway, a director acknowledged as a card-carrying sadist, felt impelled to explain himself.

“Listen, Mitch,” he said. “I got this thing. Sometimes I get a little excited, call actors names and cuss them, but I want you to know it’s nothing personal. It’s just me.”

“I hear you, Henry,” Mitchum replied. “I know how it is. I’ve got this thing, too. See, whenever somebody calls me names or cusses me out, I haul off and bust him in the mouth. Nothing personal. It’s just me.”

033273717f5883317111db13a7f96a6c
Mitchum in prison for marijuana possession, 1949

Dillman shares another anecdote:

Yet few know what an intelligent, articulate man Mitchum is, how charming he can be. He’s also a prankster. When I worked with him on location in Hong Kong, our director was hearing-impaired. In the briefcase used for transporting his script he carried several hearing aid battery replacements. We’d rehearsed a scene in an office, we were doing Take One, I’d fed Mitch his cue, when he mouthed his response. No sound.

“Cut.” The director was pounding his ear. “Damn,” he said, removing the device, opening his briefcase to install a fresh battery. “Okay, let’s go again.”

Take Two. I give the cue, Mitch mouths his line.

“Cut.” The director pounding his ear anew. “Who makes these things, anyway?”

It took four takes for him to realize he’d been victimized by an imp.

The imp struck again during a scene in the lobby of the Hotel Peninsula, he and I seated at a table. Normally spectators keep a respectful distance as they observe the moviemaking process, but a blonde plumper spilling out of her pink pants suit couldn’t restrain herself. Between takes she rushed over and did a five-minute number on how Robert Mitchum ruled her life, how jealous he made her husband, how her friends teased her about her crush. It went on and on, the actor grunting occasionally before pretending to nod off.

The lady’s moving lips were right in his ear when Mitch jolted awake. Feigning shock, he thundered, “Suck what?”

b70-9896

Excerpt from Lee Server’s Robert Mitchum: Baby, I Don’t Care:

Director and star proved to be ideally matched. In [Robert] Mitchum, [Jacques] Tourneur had found the most expressive embodiment of his own cinematic aesthetic of eloquent, subversive resistance and oneiric sensuality. Tourneur loved Mitchum’s physical grace, the gliding, pantherlike movements, and his underplaying and powerful silences, his expressive quiescence thrilled the director whose films were among the quietest in the history of talking pictures. He savored Mitchum’s ability to listen in a scene. “There are a large number of players who don’t know how to listen,” said Tourneur. “While one of their partners speaks to them, they simply think, I don’t have anything to do during this; let’s try not to let the scene get stolen from me. Mitchum can be silent and listen to a five-minute speech. You’ll never lose sight of him and you’ll understand that he takes in what is said to him, even if he doesn’t do anything. That’s how one judges good actors.”

In Mitchum’s opposite, the sort who tried “not to let the scene get stolen”, Tourneur might possibly have been thinking of Kirk Douglas. With his explosive starring roles – Champion, Ace in the Hole, Detective Story – still a few years off, Douglas was becoming typed for intelligent, urbane characters, supporting parts. As Whit Sterling, certainly among the most well-spoken and civilized of ruthless racketeers, Douglas gave a brilliantly controlled and charismatic performance, but he could not have been thrilled by another second fiddle part – especially second fiddle to Mitchum, who had already taken from him the lead in Pursued. The two got along well enough off the set, but the rivalry would flare as soon as the cameras began to turn. Since Tourneur was not about to accept any obvious histrionics in his diminuendo world, Douglas was left to try and out-underact Mitchum, an exercise in futility, he discovered. He tried adding distracting bits of business during Mitchum’s lines and came up with a coin trick, running it quickly between the tops of his fingers. Bob started staring at the fingers until Kirk started staring at the fingers and dropped the coin on the rug. He put the coin away. In another scene, Douglas brought a gold watch fob out of his coat pocket and twirled it around like a propeller. This time everybody stared.

“It was a hoot to watch them go at it,” said Jane Greer. “They were two such different types. Kirk was something of a method actor. And Bob was Bob. You weren’t going to catch him acting. But they both tried to get the advantage. At one point they were actually trying to upstage each other by who could sit the lowest. The one sitting the lowest had the best camera angle, I guess – I don’t know what they were thinking. Bob sat on the couch, so Kirk sat on the table, then one sat on the footstool, and by the end I think they were both on the floor.”

Tourneur, no martinet, liked to give his performers a lot of freedom and waited out the one-upmanship antics with a weary grace. “Quoi qu’il arrive, restez calme,” he liked to say.

Actors were actors. One night he was screening the rushes of a scene with Mitchum and Douglas talking to each other on either side of the frame, and he was startled to see how Paul Valentine – placed in the background and without a line of dialogue – had craftily picked up a magazine and was flipping the pages with an altogether distracting intensity, hijacking the scene.

“Oh, Paul,” he said to the actor, “now I have to keep an eye on you, too?”

tr25
Robert Mitchum in 1958’s “Thunder Road,” a Gearhead Heaven type of movie

The duet in The Night of the Hunter is one of the most memorable and frightening scenes in cinema. A standoff between two dueling brands of Christianity, one that’s about compassion and one that’s about judgment. The sides cannot coexist. One side has to win. It is a battle still raging in our culture today, and the duet in Night of the Hunter is a chilling evocation of it. Whistler’s Mother with a shotgun vs. The Man Out There In the Dark.

Believers, both of them. Both are ready to break a Commandment, one of the most important Commandments of all. Until then, they sing.

The hairs on the back of my neck stand up just thinking about this scene.

Mitchum made a big point of never seeming to work. He strolls through movies, smoking, looking around with heavy-lidded eyes, easy, natural, and can be ominous or sexy, sometimes at the same time. He was the ultimate Alpha Male. He could be terrifying (as in Night of the Hunter), or sexy and romantic. He could be a resourceful hero. He could be a sad-sack low-life. He could conduct his own “instrument”, like a Maestro, bringing this or that quality forward, but my analogy makes his work sound deliberate or studied. Nothing he did was ever studied. He was a valid leading man for decades. This cannot be explained. Some things just are.

INg5RNk
Mitchum in “Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison” (1957)

I also love him for personally reaching out to Elvis to co-star with him in a movie he was developing (which ended up being Thunder Road). Elvis was so flattered that Mitchum came to see him personally, and also that Mitchum would have thought of him at all. The Colonel was furious and made it clear to his 21-year-old client that any and all offers had to come to the Colonel FIRST, and Elvis had no business making any deals without the Colonel’s say-so. The image, though, of Elvis and Mitchum, two crazy hep-cats, sitting around in Elvis’ suite in The Knickerbocker, Mitchum “pitching” his project to the young King of Rock ‘n’ Roll …

Well, I guess I just wish I had been there.

David Thomson wrote in his The New Biographical Dictionary of Film: Sixth Edition:

How can I offer this hunk as one of the best actors in the movies? Start by referring back to that dialogue [in Out of the Past]: it touches the intriguing ambiguity in Mitchum’s work, the idea of a man thinking and feeling beneath a calm exterior that there is no need to put “acting” on the surface. And for a big man, he is immensely agile, capable of unsmiling humor, menace, stoicism, and, above all, of watching other people as though he were waiting to make up his mind. Of course, Mitchum has been in bad films, when he slips into the weariness of someone who has read the script, but hopes it may be rewritten. But since the war, no American actor has made more first-class films, in so many different moods.

Friends of Eddie Coyle

Mitchum’s monologue in the bowling alley in the wonderful gritty Friends of Eddie Coyle is a pure example of why Mitchum is so great. Done mainly in one shot, with only a couple of reaction shots.

Watch how Eddie Coyle (Mitchum) puts the arrogant yet stupid gun-runner (Steven Keats) in his place. You can almost see (or at least I can imagine I can see), Keats the actor watching Mitchum the actor, right in his face, thinking, “Holy shit, he is so good.” Or: he’s not thinking at all. Mitchum is so connected to himself and what he’s saying that Keats is drawn into that reality without having to work at it. You see that’s also the thing with genius actors. Not only do they make it look easy but they HELP everyone else around them to be as good as they are. That’s how much authority they have.

The monologue I’m talking about starts at around the 1 minute mark. It is rare today to let a scene go that long without a million cuts. To let someone just talk in that way. Movies today are poorer for it.

This is acting, in its purest most beautiful form.

To quote David Thomson again on Mitchum:

Untouchable.

robert-mitchum-wallpapers-5

And finally, just because it’s riveting:

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Actors, Movies, On This Day | Tagged | 34 Comments

“I wrote as much as seventy lines at one time, and used to go shouting them about the fields after dark.” — Alfred, Lord Tennyson

He was not only a minor Virgil, he is also with Virgil as Dante saw him, a Virgil among the Shades, the saddest of all English poets. – T.S. Eliot

It’s Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s birthday, born on August 6, 1809.

Before we get started, here’s a short poem from the man who wrote long poems. I think it’s perfection.

The Eagle
He clasps the crag with crooked hands;
Close to the sun in lonely lands,
Ring’d with the azure world, he stands.

The wrinkled sea beneath him crawls;
He watches from his mountain walls,
And like a thunderbolt he falls.

Continue reading

Posted in Books, James Joyce, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Podcast: Jen Johans and I discuss Dana Andrews

It was so fun to chat with Jen Johans, host of the excellent podcast Watch with Jen, about Dana Andrews. We discuss Laura, Where the Sidewalk Ends, Fallen Angel, Daisy Kenyon (all directed by Otto Preminger), with mentions of Ball of Fire, Best Years of Our Lives, The Ox-Bow Incident, and more. He is universally beloved – if YouTube/Instagram/Whatever comments sections are any indication but he is also strangely under-discussed. Imogen Smith wrote a wonderful piece about him, and I referenced it quite a bit.

You can listen to our discussion here, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Posted in Actors | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Poets, the best of them, are a very chameleonic race.” — Percy Bysshe Shelley

Drive my dead thoughts over the universe
Like wither’d leaves to quicken a new birth!
And, by the incantation of this verse,

Scatter, as from an unextinguish’d hearth
Ashes and sparks, my words among mankind!
Be through my lips to unawaken’d earth

The trumpet of a prophecy! O Wind,
If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind?
— Percy Bysshe Shelley, from “Ode to the West Wind”

Continue reading

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

“There is one Metallica. We have many styles, it’s called Metallica.” — James Hetfield

It’s his birthday today. Here’s my review of Through the Never, the 3-D concert film – plus concept film – starring Metallica. I’m really proud of that review.

This clips haunts me. It looks like the world is ending, or a new world is being born with great chaos and violence. Something being unleashed into the world. The bottle smashed.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Music, On This Day | Tagged | 5 Comments

“The trouble with Hollywood is everybody is crazy for money.” — Ann Dvorak

Anna McKim chose “Ann Dvorak” as her stage name. She chose a challenging name to pronounce (for American audiences, that is) over her easily-pronounceable real name. Who does that?? Well, she does. It says a lot. It’s mischievous. I love it.

Jen Johans and I delved into the extremely satisfying subject of pre-Code actress Ann Dvorak when I appeared on Jen’s podcast to discuss Pre-Code films. Ann Dvorak should be WAY more remembered than she is. Her career has suffered eclipse for many years basically because so many of her films weren’t seen for decades – in the years before television and VHS and etc. That has since been rectified, with the Forbidden Hollywood box sets – where she reigns supreme – and also streaming platforms. If you have Amazon Prime, put her name in, and some of these old and almost completely forgotten films will come up. Ann Dvorak’s work does not date. It is so unbelievably contemporary: ALWAYS.

Heat Lightning is a relatively recent discovery. Aline MacMahon, known mostly as a sidekick character actress in pre-Codes, and always good, takes center stage, and is heartbreaking and tough-minded and funny. The whole film is great and so worth discovering. It’s streaming on Amazon! In Heat Lightning, Dvorak’s character looks forward to the youth-quake of the 1950s, with films like Splendour in the Grass or Rebel Without a Cause, a restless teenager in a hurry to grow up, bucking up against adult control, flirting with danger, anything to get OUT.


Heat Lightning

Dvorak is probably most well known for her performance in Howard Hawks’ Scarface, one of her films to have been played consistently over the years (and associated with Brian De Palma’s remake). Dvorak is hot-to-trot in it, as the gangster’s sister, busting out of the confines of her family – and her clearly incestuous relationship with her brother (it’s barely euphemistic). She’s wild and “carefree”, wearing a backless dress with straps making an X across her creamy skin. (Scarface is filled with ominous symbolic X-es.)

She’s such a disturbing and deeply connected screen presence.

Her best performance by a long shot is in Three on a Match, directed by Mervyn LeRoy. She is almost spookily ahead of her time. It’s a fearless performance, even for a Pre-Code. The performance doesn’t date at all. Throw her into a 1986 Brian De Palma film, she’d fit right in. The character’s arc is bleak and tragic. She is a rich girl, a rich woman, and … bored. Her boredom is existential in nature. There’s something missing. There’s a blank at the center of all of it, and she can’t really explain it. She just knows it’s there.

And so she runs away. And she takes her child with her. She vanishes into the underworld. And she feels no remorse about the husband who is devastated at his child being missing, who has no idea where she has gone. She is DONE playing by the world’s rules, she is DONE being a “good girl”.

This is not a happy story. She RACES to the bottom. She consorts with gangsters, she becomes addicted to heroin almost overnight, and most probably sells her body to support her habit – all as her little son, a baby, sits across the room looking on, filthy, neglected, traumatized. This is bleak shit, even by Pre-Code standards. And it gets even worse. Dvorak’s performance is unblinkingly realistic.

Three On a Match has not been available until relatively recently, a real loss. But it’s now “out there”, it plays at festivals, it plays on TCM, it’s in a box set. There’s no reason at this point that Dvorak’s performance – or Dvorak – should “sink into obscurity.” Her final scene in Three on a Match is difficult to watch. When you want to swoop in and save a character, when you want to leap through the screen to stop the horror unfolding – you know you’re in the presence of the Tragic.

Dvorak always had a tough side, a sharp edge, but these performances make me think she would have been a phenomenal Blanche Dubois (whose core is quite tough beneath the Southern belle persona). Dvorak lived in the dichotomy: ladylike, tough, romantic, streetsmart … Not a lot of people understand that fluid in-between state, but she did.

My friend Imogen Smith has written a lot about Three on a Match (and pre-Code movies in general), as well as a great piece on Dvorak for Chiseler – which can be read on the Wayback Machine (thanks Carl!). Here’s Imogen on Dvorak in Three on a Match:

You would never guess from this film that Bette Davis would wind up the best known of the three actresses, or that Humphrey Bogart would become a beloved icon, while Ann Dvorak would sink into obscurity.

Cosign.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Actors, Movies, On This Day | Tagged , , , , | 8 Comments

“He who has never felt, momentarily, what madness is has but a mouthful of brains.” — Herman Melville

“Old nineteenth-century New England must have been fearful–in what other country would Thoreau, Melville, Whitman and Dickinson have been so overlooked?” — Robert Lowell, letter to Elizabeth Bishop, December 12, 1958

Herman Melville was born on this day in 1819. Here’s a post filled with many many quotes about Melville. They come from everywhere: from reviews of Moby-Dick when it first came out, to John Huston’s comment on the book, to Hart Crane’s stunning poem, to correspondence between Melville and his BFF Nathaniel Hawthorne. I love Moby-Dick but I also love his short fiction. Bartleby! BLB: Be like Bartleby. All you need to say is “I prefer not to.” End-stop. I have grown to appreciate Billy Budd (after scorning it in high school). Its homoeroticism so strong it could be transferred to a bathhouse in 1970s New York no problem, or an Abercrombie & Fitch campaign circa 1994. His poetry, too, has been a revelatory discovery.

Art

by Herman Melville

In placid hours well-pleased we dream
Of many a brave unbodied scheme.
But form to lend, pulsed life create,
What unlike things must meet and mate:
A flame to melt–a wind to freeze;
Sad patience–joyous energies;
Humility–yet pride and scorn;
Instinct and study; love and hate;
Audacity–reverence. These must mate,
And fuse with Jacob’s mystic heart,
To wrestle with the angel–Art.

More after the jump:

Continue reading

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

“I’ve never been a guy who had more than a toe in Hollywood anyway, so my toe is more easily lopped off than most.” — Richard Linklater

8662485415_2ff0b4de6d_z
Richard Linklater, at Ebertfest 2013, presenting “Bernie.” Photo by yours truly.

It’s his birthday today. One of my favorite contemporary filmmakers (if not my favorite?)

Here’s my essay on Movie Mezzanine: Time After Time: Looking Back at “Before Sunrise”.

Here’s my review of Everybody Wants Some on Rogerebert.com.

Here’s my review of Boyhood.

Here’s my post on Bernie from Ebertfest 2013, with Richard Linklater in attendance and Jack Black calling in (a storm had wreaked havoc on his flight to O’Hare and he couldn’t get there in time: “I’m so sorry I can’t be there with you guys!” he moaned over the loudspeaker.)

tumblr_lf3cg1F2651qcfba3o1_500

It is my belief that of all the Linklater films, in the future, when we are all ashes and dust, School of Rock will be the last one standing. It will outlive them all. I love the clips of the School of Rock 10-year reunion in Austin, with Jack Black and all the “kids”, now all grown up, giving a concert (Richard Linklater in attendance, seen in the crowd in some of the clips).

Richard Linklater is an American master. And his body of work will just grow in stature, even more than it has now. He gets good reviews, but compared to Paul Thomas Anderson or Steven Soderbergh – or maybe just because his films are so funny and usually don’t star A-Listers – he’s just not seen as this “weighty genius.” Weighty geniuses may take up most of the print in their day and age, but it’s those who make it look easy – those who do what they do better than anyone else – people like Michael Curtiz, for example – who often are the ones who create the works that really stand the test of time. Linklater, most definitely, will be one of those guys. Even more thrilling, he’s so YOUNG. He’s turning just 60 years old today! We have so much more to look forward to.

Last year, we got TWO Linklater films! I am so in love with Nouvelle Vague. I was not alive when Breathless was released, so what do I know, but Nouvelle Vague caught the flame of what it must have actually FELT like making that movie.


Guillaume Marbeck as Jean-Luc Godard in “Nouvelle Vague”

“It’s tough, man. Unless it’s a tentpole, sequel, remake, or over-the-top comedy, that’s all the studios are even doing. They’ve kind of admitted they’re not in the business of doing anything else. The slightest level of irony or intelligence and, boom, you’re out of the league, you’re done.” — Richard Linklater

Posted in Directors, Movies, On This Day | Tagged | 12 Comments

Happy Birthday, Emily Brontë: “a solitude-loving raven, no gentle dove”

CLKKe-lVAAATC5-

“My sister Emily loved the moors. Flowers brighter than the rose bloomed in the blackest of the heath for her; — out of a sullen hollow in a livid hill-side, her mind could make an Eden. She found in the bleak solitude many and dear delights; and not the least and best-loved was – liberty. Liberty was the breath of Emily’s nostrils; without it she perished.” — Charlotte Brontë

Of all the eccentric Brontë siblings, we know the least about Emily because she almost never left home, and therefore she left behind almost no personal correspondence. Charlotte worked away from home, and was a devoted letter-writer. Not Emily.

I must mention the movie Emily, which came out in 2023. I admired what it was trying to do, although I’m sure some people were pissed. Lots of speculation, of course, but the speculation is an act of imaginative empathy. I loved it: I reviewed for Ebert.

The stories about Emily that have made it down through the centuries are mysterious and slightly scary: she’s there but to some degree she remains un-knowable. A wild solitary woman striding across the moors, preferring nature to people, but also beating her dog viciously, devoted to her dissipated brother Branwell who was running the family ragged, Emily was anti-social, forbidding but … we don’t really know why. Spectrum? Perhaps! Who knows. And then … well, you know, there’s writing Wuthering Heights, a crazy book where civilized society does not even exist as a stable reference point. WHERE did this come from? (I’m not looking for an answer. I am just faced with the incomprehensibility of Wuthering Heights and its inception every time I read it.)

More after the jump.

Continue reading

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

“There are no ‘old’ movies really – only movies you have already seen and ones you haven’t.” — Peter Bogdanovich

A re-post of the huge thing I wrote after Bogdanovich died, ending with my personal encounter with him where he kissed my hand.

I cannot sufficiently express what his films have meant to me, let alone his writing about films which has been almost as influential.

When we were kids, our parents let me and my brother stay up late twice (in my memory, at least) on a school night so we could see two movies. One was The Sting and one was What’s Up Doc? Both were formative experiences for me, albeit in very different ways, and What’s Up Doc? continues to be an O’Malley Tradition (Lucy was Eunice Burns for Halloween this year!) I am lucky to have friends – from literally every era of my life – who also love What’s Up Doc? and can recite it start to finish. Seriously. Childhood friends. College friends. Friends from work. It’s like a secret code. You’re standing at a party, and you’re bored, and someone says “Don’t you know the meaning of propriety?” and you know you are in the presence of a Kindred Spirit.

Continue reading

Posted in Directors, Movies, Personal | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments