Daily Book Excerpt: YA/Children’s books:
Further Chronicles of Avonlea – “Tannis of the Flats” – by L.M. Montgomery
This story is really interesting, I think, because of the racial aspect. Lucy Maud doesn’t really deal with racial issues – at least not overtly – and this is the only story I can think of where she does. It doesn’t take place on Price Edward Island, either – although one of the main characters is visiting FROM PEI – it takes place out on the wild west of the Canadian prairies – at a small settlement where a telegraph office has been set up. It’s not as domesticated as Avonlea (it’s not domesticated at all, let’s say that) – and surrounding the town, in huddled teepees, are “Indians”, Indians who do odd jobs, who just hang on the outskirts of what used to be their land, doing not much at all. Lucy Maud does not have a very high opinion of these people, you can tell, and yet … then there’s Tannis … a young Indian woman. She has limitations ONLY due to her race, which Lucy Maud appears to believe is in the blood: Indians are lazy, sullen, can’t really go very far in life. Not just because the opportunities are not there, but because it is not in their BLOOD to be otherwise. Tannis is humorless, she has no sense of irony – which turns out to be a huge defect in this case, she doesn’t do things for “fun”, she is LITERAL). She also, at the end of the story, does something selfless and sacrificial. She gives up her chance at happiness – in order to get the man she loves what he needs (which, in this case, is another woman). Tannis is the heroine of the day. Tannis rises to a height unknown in the more polite and genteel white world. She is the one. So … even though there are parts of the story where you see the racist attitudes of pretty much everyone at that time towards the Indians … Tannis is not a generalized stereotype. She is a real person, a real girl. It’s a VERY interesting story – and one of my favorites that Lucy Maud has written. I can’t really LOVE Tannis, because the way Lucy Maud writes her – she is not very lovable. But she is a heroine nonetheless.
Anyway, here’s the excerpt where Tannis is first described. You’ll see the racist attitude towards mixed blood (oh, and Tannis is a “half-breed” – which many saw, including Cher, as being even WORSE. If you were a half-breed, that’s all you ever heard.) even with Lucy Maud’s attitude towards race and blood: you can tell that, on another level, she is criticizing the snobbery of the white world, the assumptioins of the white world. You must ADJUST your assumptions with different people … you cannot assume that every woman is the same (this is for Jerome Carey) … you have to learn how to read the signs … do not treat everybody as though they are cutouts of each other. That way disaster lies. Tannis is NOT like other women. Jerome Carey doesn’t read the signs.
Excerpt from Further Chronicles of Avonlea – “Tannis of the Flats” – by L.M. Montgomery
Carey found the Flats quite tolerable after the homecoming of Tannis. He soon fell into the habit of dropping into the Dumont house to spend the evening, talking with Tannis in the parlor – which apartment was amazingly well-done for a place like the Flats – Tannis had not studied Prince Albert parlors four years for nothing – or playing violin and piano duets with her. When music and conversation palled, they went for long gallops over the prairies together. Tannis rode to perfection, and managed her bad-tempered brute of a pony with a skill and grace that made Carey applaud her. She was glorious on horseback.
Sometimes he grew tired of the prairies, and then he and Tannis paddled themselves over the river in Nitchie Joe’s dugout, and landed on the old trail that struck straight into the wooded belt of the Saskatchewan valley, leading north to trading posts on the frontier of civilization. There they rambled under huge pines, hoary with the age of centuries, and Carey talked to Tannis about England and quoted poetry to her. Tannis liked poetry; she had studied it at school, and understood it fairly well. But once she told Carey that she thought it a long, round-about way of saying what you could say just as well in about a dozen plain words. Carey laughed. He liked to evoke those little speeches of hers. They sounded very clever, dropping from such arched, ripely-tinted lips.
If you had told Carey that he was playing with fire, he would have laughed at you. In the first place, he was not in the slightest degree in love with Tannis – he merely admired and liked her. In the second place, it never occurred to him that Tannis might be in love with him. Why, he had never attempted any love-making with her! And, above all, he was obsessed with that aforesaid fatal idea that Tannis was like the women he had associated with all his life, in reality as well as in appearance. He did not know enough of the racial characteristics to understand.
But, if Carey thought that his relationship with Tannis was that of friendship merely, he was the only one at the Flats who did think so. All the half-breeds and quarter-breeds and any-fractional breeds there believed that he meant to marry Tannis. There would have been nothing surprising to them in that. They did not know that Carey’s second cousin was a baronet, and they would not have understood that it need make any difference, if they had. They thought that rich old Auguste’s heiress, who had been to school for four years in Prince Albert, was a catch for anybody.


Does the book describe if the half-breed-edness of Tannis is a mix with French or English? – because even in that there was quite a history of disruption to say the least.
Quote from the excerpt I posted:
“Tannis’ great-grandmother had been a Cree squaw who married a French trapper. The son of this union became, in due time, the father of Auguste Dumont. Auguste married a woman whose mother was a French half-breed and whose father was a pure-bred Highland Scotchman. The result of this atrocious mixture was its justification – Tannis of the Flats – who looked as if all the blood of all the Howards might be running in her veins.”
I cannot believe you defended this story. It was shockingly racist and offensive – FAR more offensive than The Education of Betty, which you were much more critical about. Making Tannis do something that was apparently massively self-sacrificial by “half-breed” standards was LMM thinking that she was being cool, progressive and edgy. But let’s not forget that she actually agrees with the criticisms of her white characters in the tale – her male Indian characters ARE lazy, sly, un-manly and skeevy. Tannis is clearly portrayed as someone who is not Carey’s “true equal” – the sympathetic pastor character makes this clear.
I’m very, very disappointed that you did not comment more on the racism in this story. It’s a THOUSAND times worse than the sexism (and gross almost-pedophilia) in The Education of Betty.
Priyanka, I totally agree with you. I’ve been a die-hard LMM fan for 30 years. (I dragged my entire family across the continent to visit PEI just last summer because of her.) I don’t remember reading this story as a child. But reading it as an adult actually made me question my affection for this author, and I didn’t think there was anything that could do that. This story is shockingly, unapologetically racist. I don’t even want to retype some of the statements in it because they’re so offensive. Because LMM never dealt with race in her other books (other than to briefly stereotype French-Canadians as lazy and half-witted, which didn’t sit well with me either) I never realized the depth of her feelings about non-whites and her complete lack of insight into her prejudice. The only concession I am willing to make here is that we are all products of our times, and it isn’t really fair to expect a person to espouse beliefs common to people living 80 years after one’s death. But there is a big difference between privately assuming that the people around you are right and brashly announcing your cruelty to the world, as LMM did here.
I am a person of colour. It feels like a punch in the stomach to realize that this is how LMM, the author I have admired and loved for decades, would have thought of ME.
And I agree, too, that this is so much worse than some of the other things that Sheila and others on this site have gotten worked up about. Racism needs to be called out by everyone, you guys, not just the people it affects. The current state of American politics is evidence of that.
I am in agreement with the other two comments – this story is disgusting, and I’m not sure how you’re defending it. I love LMM and all her novels and diaries – but I’m glad I didn’t read this, or internalise any of these racist messages from her work as a child. I completely DISAGREE that she’s not a stereotype?