Don’t Bother To Knock (1952); Dir. Roy Baker

knock20.jpg

“I rather think that had she endured, had she come ten years later, maybe it would have been different. But at that time – I mean, she came in at the height of the Hollywood system – and she was not alone feeling debased by the whole thing. It was a common complaint. Like [the way] John Garfield was a terrific actor – yet he did nothing but scream and howl. There was some demeaning aspect to the whole thing. So most of them went with it. They simply adopted the contempt with which they were treated. I think that’s what happened. Pretty hard to withstand – a culture of contempt. I think it helped destroy her.” — Arthur Miller on Marilyn Monroe

Seeing Monroe’s performance in 1952’s Don’t Bother to Knock, as Nell, the psychologically shattered and borderline psychotic babysitter in a plush hotel, makes you wonder about all the roads not traveled. It makes you think of her courage in putting up with contemptuous projects like Let’s Make Love or The Seven Year Itch (one of the meanest spirited movies she was ever in) … and wonder what might have happened if she had been allowed to experiment. Now I’m not saying that her work, as it exists, in comedic gems such as Some Like It Hot is somehow lesser, or somehow lacking. I’m already rather annoyed that comedy often takes a backseat to drama with a capital D. It’s why Cary Grant was stiffed in the Oscar department. You show me a better performance than what he did in His Girl Friday!

Billy Wilder said this about her (and it rambles a bit – this is a transcription of a conversation he had with Cameron Crowe):

She had a kind of elegant vulgarity about her. That, I think, was very important. And she automatically knew where the joke was. She did not discuss it. She came up for the first rehearsal, and she was absolutely perfect, when she remembered the line. She could do a 3-page dialogue scene perfectly, and then get stuck on a line like, “It’s me, Sugar”… But if she showed up, she delivered, and if it took 80 takes, I lived with 80 takes, because the 81st was very good …
She had a feeling for and a fear of the camera. Fright. She was afraid of the camera, and that’s why, I think, she muffed some lines. God knows how often. She also loved the camera. Whatever she did, wherever she stood, there was always that thing that comes through. She was not even aware of it.

We all have magic in us. But Marilyn Monroe had movie magic. And, like Wilder said, “…she automatically knew where the joke was.” That kind of sensibility cannot be taught. And in the same way that it is rare to find a man as outrageously good-looking as Cary Grant who is also a comedic genius, it’s rare to find a bombshell at the level of Marilyn Monroe who can nail jokes in the way she does (even when she is the butt of them)! But she is always the one who comes off smelling like a rose, even in nasty misogynistic pictures like The Seven Year Itch, which tries to make a joke out of her (and women’s sexuality, in general). Watch that film and watch how she evades and eludes “capture” – meaning: she somehow, gently, subtly, by being totally innocent and guileless … evades being the butt of the joke. That takes guts. That takes smarts. Because, believe me, she was being set up in that film. In many of her films, she was being set up.

So I love Marilyn’s funniness, it’s one of the most spontaneous things about her. But she always yearned to show more of herself, more of what she could do. Nobody wanted to see it. However, Don’t Bother to Knock is early Monroe, or relatively early … her stardom hadn’t “hit” yet. So to watch her in this psychological drama (that has elements of a thriller) is astonishing.

Who knows what demons Monroe battled on a daily basis. All I know is that sadness and fear flickers across her face in Don’t Bother to Knock in a neverending dance. She seems truly dangerous at times. She never seems to push the emotion, it seems to just happen to her. She (Nell) is not fully control of herself and neither is Marilyn. I don’t know if Marilyn was “tapping into” her own wealth of miserable memories, or if it was her talent allowing her the ability to portray such fragility … it doesn’t matter “how” she got there. What matters is the end result. It’s a stunning performance, and most often not even mentioned when Marilyn Monroe’s career is brought up – which is a shame. She’s riveting.

knock21.jpg

Marilyn Monroe often played either naive breathless girls, easily taken in, a bit dopey, or vaguely trashy showgirls, who somehow have managed to maintain their sweetness. She never played bitter. She never played a wisecracker. That was not her thing. And whatever “experiences” she had had in her life, it had not touched that diamond-bright innocence inside her. Nothing could kill it. You watch her films and it’s truly amazing – how it is always there, even in projects that were not worthy of her. But she never played – except in Don’t Bother To Knock – a truly damaged woman. I suppose a woman with a body like that and a face like that was made to be a fantasy for audiences and audiences don’t really want to see their sex goddesses as damaged. Marilyn knew that better than anyone. She had a love-hate relationship with her beauty. It was her ticket to fame, she knew that, and she was truly grateful for it, and she knew how to use it. She was a master at creating her persona. But it was also what tormented her, and gave her such intense stage fright that she wouldn’t come out of her dressing room for sometimes hours, staring at herself in the mirror. What was she looking for? How hard was it for her to drag up that sexy goddess on days when she didn’t feel like it? I don’t have much sympathy for those who respond to questions like that with, “Oh, boo hoo, cry me a river, she was famous, we all should have such problems!” I think it represents a truly ungenerous and stingy attitude, something that she faced daily, and struggled against. And so she would lock her door, and refuse to come out, terrified of the expectations placed on her, knowing that within her was an abyss of sadness that nobody wanted to see. It had to have been horrible. I can only imagine. I don’t have that kind of beauty. I have no idea what that must be like. I think it’s indicative that she was often very afraid of directors, who could get impatient with her constant bungling of lines (it is thought that she had undiagnosed dyslexia) … but absolutely loved the crew, who loved her right back. They were her audience. They were not stingy. She would walk out of her dressing room, all dolled up, after having made everyone wait for hours, and the crew – hanging off their scaffolds – would catcall and whistle, and she ate it up. It was friendly. If you’ve ever experienced a friendly and appreciative catcall (which is something some people just can’t imagine) then you know how nice it can be. It can totally brighten your day. I’m not talking about avoiding a certain block because there’s a construction site there and you’re fucking sick of having to walk through a goddamn gantlet (who knew?? I sure as hell didn’t!), which forces you into a sexualized atmosphere at 9 a.m. when you’re just trying to go get a coffee. That’s harassment. But some dude calling out at you, “Girl, YOU PRETTY!” like happened to me once … thank you, sir!! Marilyn was loved by those guys. Because they represented her fan base. Directors loved her too, in spite of themselves – they loved her because, like Billy Wilder said, even if it took 80 takes for her to get a line – if she nailed it on the 81st, it would be the best take ever, and it would be Marilyn Monroe, after all … so that’s why she was paid the big bucks, and that’s why you sucked it up and tried not to mind having to wait around for her to get over her stage fright or whatever it was. But the love the crew had for her was simple and unhindered by concerns other than appreciation. Marilyn fed off of them. She played to them.

In Don’t Bother to Knock, she plays a resolutely unglamorous part. It’s not made into a big deal, like, “Oooh, look at the pretty movie star being plain-ed down” … It’s appropriate for the part. She wears a simple cotton dress, low heels, a little black beret – and when she gets on the elevator for the first time and we see her from behind, her dress is a little bit wrinkled. Like it would be for any woman who had just taken a long subway ride. It’s touching. Alex told me last night (she read it in some Photoplay magazine she owns. The woman is insane) that Marilyn had bought the dress herself at a five and dime for the movie. She had seen it, and known that it was Nell’s dress. I love the intelligence of that, the intelligence of her choice for the character. It’s perfect.

Nell’s backstory unfolds slowly. When we first see her come through the revolving doors, we see a pretty woman, who seems unsure. Her step is hesitating. She looks like a raw nerve, everything making an impression on her, like she hasn’t been out in public for a long long time (this turns out to be true – but watch how Marilyn is playing it in the first scene, before we know anything about her. That’s smart acting. That’s building a character.) If we know the rest of Marilyn Monroe’s work, we may be forgiven for thinking that Nell is just another one of her naive breathless creations. She meets up with the elevator man, who turns out to be her uncle, who has gotten her a job babysitting for a child of guests in the hotel. The uncle seems solicitous, perhaps overly so. He says, “You won’t have any trouble babysitting, will you, Nell?” A bottomless look of sadness battling with fear comes over Marilyn’s face. It’s startling. This was my first clue that Nell was going to be a little different than Marilyn’s other characters. She says, “Of course not. Why would I?” She’s not defensive. But unbelievably sad that his question even needs to be asked. It seems to suggest that there might be something … wrong with her. The movie is full of tiny eloquent moments like that.

knock2.jpg

Nell is brought into the hotel room, and meets the parents of Bunny, the little girl she will be babysitting. The parents swirl out, leaving simple instructions. Nell reads Bunny a fairy story before she goes to bed. There is something touching here, and also not quite right. Marilyn reads the story in almost a monotone, a dreamy uninflected voice, as though she is trying to imagine herself into the story she is reading. Bunny is riveted.

knock4.jpg

Once Bunny goes to bed, Nell is left alone in the apartment. She’s aimless. When her face is in stasis, and when she is alone, all you see is her sadness. There’s no peace on her face. In the introduction to the parents, and in her dealings with her uncle, she tries to keep it together, and put on a social happy expression. But once alone, the mask is off. Marilyn was so rarely without her mask, and so it’s amazing to watch.

Another thing that is fascinating about this film, and also singular in Marilyn’s career, is that she gets the opportunity to show anger. Rage. I can’t think of another film where she truly gets angry, where she asserts herself in that way. It’s terrifying.

Meanwhile, another story goes on in the film. Richard Widmark plays Jed, a cynical pilot, who’s been dating Lynn, played by Anne Bancroft. Lyn is a lounge singer in the hotel, Jed flies in on the weekends. It’s obviously a “friends with benefits” type situation, and Lyn has been okay with that, up until now. She’s portrayed by Bancroft as an intelligent and compassionate woman, who is not above having harmless fun, and she’s not the type to yearn for domesticity or put the pressure on him to commit. But there are qualities she senses in Jed that disturb her, and she finally has come to the decision that she can’t be with him anymore. It’s his coldness, the way he treats people … everything is seen through a cynical snarky lens … and any act of kindness is assigned a base motive. You can see it in how he treats Eddie, the elevator man, who tries to joke with him. You can see it in the contemptuous way he treats the woman who wants to take their photograph. Richard Widmark (ooomph, he’s sexy in this film) only has a couple of specific moments where these qualities can be displayed, and he nails them. We can see Lyn’s point. He makes fun of her. She says, “You lack what I need. You lack an understanding heart.” They “wrangle” back and forth in the bar of the hotel, and she’s pretty certain that she needs to walk away. He’s the kind of guy who has a little black book of names, always in his back pocket, but there’s something about this Lyn woman that has gotten under his skin. He can’t admit it yet. He’s too proud. But her calm and reasoned explanation leaves him restless, pissed.

knock6.jpg

Jed finds himself at loose ends back up in his hotel room, while he can hear the lovely strains of Lyn singing torch songs (or, to say it another way, Anne Bancroft lip syncing) through the radio on the wall, connected to the bar downstairs (a nice omnipresent touch). He pours a drink. He lies on the bed. He throws his black book on the floor. He’s cranky. And then he catches a glimpse in the window across the way – of Nell, dressed up in a gown, dancing around. A private moment. It’s a haunting image, and Jed is struck dumb. Eventually she notices him, and they begin a conversation across the space in-between. He figures out her room number from the floor plan on the back of the door, and calls her. They sit and talk on the phone, staring at each other from window to window.

knock10.jpg

Now one of the things that I really love about this film is Richard Widmark’s journey through it, and how he treats Nell at first, and then adjusts to the reality before him. Here’s the thing: Marilyn was really about 11 years old inside. I think that’s one of the reasons why pairing her up with someone like, oh, John Wayne, wouldn’t have worked. Wayne required a grown-up. The thing about Marilyn, the captivating and also complicated thing, is that she was a little innocent girl in that sex-bomb of a body. And Richard Widmark’s Jed, a guy out for a good time, a guy looking, in this moment anyway, to fuck his loneliness away … only sees the body at first. But don’t we all? I can’t judge him for that. It’s quite a body. He looks at Nell, and sees … well … Marilyn Monroe … and he thinks: I have hit the jackpot here. There’s also a certain passivity in Nell (at first), a certain willingness … and so Jed, who’s not in the mood for a fight, thinks that it will be pretty easy to seduce this one. And that’s what he wants right now. No more problems, for God’s sake. But over the devastating course of their next couple of scenes, when he invites himself over to her room (not knowing, of course, that it is not her room at all), he begins to realize that something is not right. They kiss, they drink, they flirt … and something opens up in Nell, something is unleashed. She projects onto him all of her hopes and dreams, which is alarming – and has a kind of Fatal Attraction feel to it. Jed gets that vibe. And instead of ignoring it, and taking what he thinks he deserves anyway (after all, she invited him over – she’s in a negligee – she knows what he wants!), he turns her down. And in so doing, becomes a better man. He shows his “understanding heart”. He doesn’t realize that that is what is happening in the moment, he just knows that seducing this woman would be wrong. Kim Morgan, in her wonderful review of the film, writes:

In real life, most men wouldn’t so sensitively resist.

That, to me, is the most moving part of the film: Widmark’s growing realization that Nell is sick, and his decision to help her, rather than just add to the hurts she’s experienced. I can’t think of another film of Marilyn’s where she is treated in quite the way that Widmark treats her. She’s usually a bombshell, a friendly girlie bombshell, eager, open-eyed, innocent, and yet smokin’. There is never any concern for how she might feel, being treated like a walking-talking blow-up doll. It is assumed that she is on board with it – and, like I said, Marilyn, for the most part, was. She was a movie goddess. We don’t want to know that movie goddesses might have contradictory opinions about being ogled over in film after film. Marilyn’s power was in strolling through that kind of gantlet and coming out unscathed, and still glowing. She did it in film after film. But in Don’t Bother To Knock, she is actually human, and Widmark, at first distracted by the boobs and the face, ends up seeing her as she really is: a damaged sad little girl, trapped in a pin-up model’s body. It’s incredibly moving to watch that transformation happen in Widmark’s face. Marilyn has never been treated so, well, kindly, as she is in this film.

knock16.jpg

Don’t Bother To Knock had a short shooting schedule, and Marilyn actually is not in a hell of a lot of it. It feels like she is, she dominates the film – but the scenes with Widmark and Bancroft take up quite a bit of time as well, and so Marilyn only really shot for 2 weeks. She was so enamored with Anne Bancroft’s acting that she would show up on the set to watch Bancroft’s scenes being filmed. Bancroft was a “real” actress, and this was at the point in Marilyn’s life (with the encouragement of her good friend Shelley Winters) that Marilyn was starting to learn her craft, and taking acting classes at The Actors Studio. Bancroft represented the serious side of the business, the actresses, who got to act, rather than just show their awesome silhouettes, and giggle and simper and wear bathing suits, etc. Marilyn so wanted to be considered a real actress.

And you know, like I said in the beginning, I love her stuff in comedies, musicals, melodramas … I’m a fan, regardless of the material. She’s got “it”. What she is able to do in Some Like It Hot is awesome – it’s movie magic. And when Marilyn was put in projects like that, projects that were worthy of her talents, she was very happy. She hated some of the stuff she was forced to do (uhm, Let’s Make Love, for example), and she hated that she wasn’t able, most of the time, to show the full spectrum. Her idols were not other bombshells. Her idols were real actresses.

We are a couple of years away, in Don’t Bother to Knock, from Marilyn’s famous disappearing act, when she dropped off the face of the earth, and wasn’t heard from for a month or so … until she re-emerged in New York, having moved there to study with Lee Strasberg, and to develop her own projects. She formed a production company. She wanted to do The Brothers Karamazov. It was a hugely rebellious act, and was treated with disdain by the powers-that-be, but it was her way of saying, “I do not like the movies I am being put in. I am taking the reins of my own career.” And how was she rewarded? By having a reporter ask her at a press conference, “Do you know how to spell Dostoevsky, Marilyn?”

The guts that woman had. To tolerate such condescension.

And Don’t Bother to Knock, although a big flop at the time, and not well-remembered at all, is evidence of the many shades of Marilyn Monroe; it is a nuanced terrifying performance, and her crack-up at the end is shattering to watch. She walks across the hotel lobby, and her arms look stiff and un-usable, she is vaguely unsteady on her feet, as though she is learning to walk all over again, her face is wet with tears, and she blinks up at the lights of the lobby, alarmed, squinting at the glare. She goes down the steps, one step, two step, her body slack and yet also rigid, she cannot move easily. Her psychic pain emanates not just from her face, the ending is not done in closeup, it’s a full-body shot … and her physicality is eloquent. It tells the whole story. Her pain is in her pinky finger, her waist, her calves … It surges through her and makes it difficult to even walk.

You know who plays a scene that well and with that much specificity and abandon?

A real actress does, that’s who.


knock19.jpg

knock3.jpg

knock5.jpg

knock15.jpg

knock18.jpg

“Gauntlet” has been changed to “gantlet” throughout. You learn something new every day. Thanks, Kerry!

This entry was posted in Movies and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to Don’t Bother To Knock (1952); Dir. Roy Baker

  1. Ceci says:

    Sheila: I’m at work now so I can’t do your post any justice – but I will read it (several times, that’s for sure) as soon as I have a free minute. I can’t wait to dig into your thoughts about Marilyn’s performance!

    I just wanted to say that I’m THRILLED that you finally got to see Marilyn in this picture!

  2. Brendan says:

    i must see this movie! i had a strange reaction to 7 Year Itch…i thought in an odd way it commented on the ridiculous nature of the times. maybe a little too unconsciously but in a ‘how to succeed in business’ way, know what i mean?

  3. red says:

    Brendan – I think you might be giving it way too much credit!! Or – if you feel that way, I think it is strictly because of Marilyn’s performance, NOT how it is written … It’s her eluding capture that makes it seem like a commentary on the times, rather than the material.

    Just my two cents.

    But yes!!! You have to see this movie!

  4. red says:

    Ceci – Yes, yes, come back soon! Can’t WAIT to hear your observations!

  5. red says:

    Bren – I’m dying to hear what you think of it. I know how you love her … it’s really quite something to see her in this kind of part. Put it on Ye Olde Netflix queue pronto!

  6. Alex says:

    I’ve read this post twice now.

    I’m off to read it again.

    You’re a genius, Sheila.

  7. red says:

    It’s not enough that we talked for four hours on the phone last night and discussed this film exhaustively. We must talk MORE!! Please add your thoughts (before you go to Romania, I mean).

  8. ted says:

    Stunner review, Sheila. I have got to see this movie.

  9. Sal says:

    If you haven’t read her, Charlotte Armstrong, who wrote the novella this was made from, is very good.
    She’s got one called “A Dram of Poison” I would love to see filmed. You know, the kind of project you cast in your mind.
    Great, great review. Must put in queue.

  10. red says:

    Sal – cool info about the source material! Thank you for that!!

  11. tracey says:

    Well, I pretty much have to see this now.

  12. red says:

    Ted – yes, you must!! So wonderful! Add it to the long list! :)

  13. red says:

    Tracey – Yes. To be blunt. You MUST!

  14. Ceci says:

    Well, I am trying to write a coherent sentence that expresses how much I agree with you on Marilyn’s performance on this film… but my English is not that good! So sorry if I start to ramble like an insane person…

    Wow. WOW!!! I have nothing to add – you just wrote the perfect post about this film, period. And I have nothing to add because I have learned more than I knew myself about this film! (for an obsessive, you know that is a tough admission, hahaha!!!) I knew it would be like that: your views, as an actress yourself, are so valuable… I feel I understand the nuances of Marilyn’s performance much better after reading your thoughts on it, on Marilyn’s acting processes… As I am no actress, much of that information is actually out of my reach, so I take a lot out of your views.

    I think it wonderful that you not only write your opinion on the film, but that you also put it in context in terms of the place Marilyn was at both in her life and in her career at the time. Your comment about her being a child inside: so spot on!

    A big thank you also to Alex for the tidbit about Marilyn’s costume: I didn’t know she had bought it herself!!! But it is so much a Marilyn thing to do – she researched her roles deeply, studied them so much… at the time she was working with Natasha Lytess as her acting coach, she was so serious about improving her craft.

    I could go on all day writing down incoherent thoughts like this, but I will have mercy on your blog and call it a day! ;)

  15. red says:

    Ceci – I love it when you ramble like an insane person!

    How long did she work with Natasha? And what happened to make her switch to the Strasbergs? Was there a falling out?

    I was just so moved by her body language at the end of the film – after she has “snapped” – and I was even more moved by the look on Anne Bancroft’s face as she looks at Marilyn in that last scene … such compassion, such gentleness … Bancroft could totally have played her character as jealous in that moment, jealous of her boyfriend’s concern for this woman – but she doesn’t. She watches him care for Marilyn – and she realizes how much she loves him.

    Gulp. It’s so so moving to me.

  16. Ceci says:

    Sorry for the late answer, Sheila – but I didn’t want to leave your questions unanswered!

    Marilyn worked with Natasha up until completion of “The Seven Year Itch” in 1954. Afterwards, Marilyn left Hollywood for New York, in the context of her fight with Fox over the roles she was given and her film contract in general. She began taking acting lessons with Lee Strasberg as soon as February 1955. Marilyn did not film another picture until 1956, and by that time she was already working with Paula Strasberg.

    The whole Natasha Lytess business is surrounded by some mystery, because she got unceremoniously dumped, with no explanation from Marilyn whatsoever. It was always contended that Marilyn had been cruel in her treatment of Natasha, but in one of the later Marilyn biographies it is argued that the reason Natasha got banned from Marilyn’s life was that during Marilyn’s absence from Hollywood (during which Natasha still received wages from the Fox studios) she was planning to publish an exposé of Marilyn in Photoplay – Marilyn felt betrayed (something she could never forgive, betrayal) and that is why she got rid of Natasha, never to hear from her again. Who knows?

    As for Anne Bancroft, she’s fabulous. Regarding this last scene in “Don’t Bother to Knock”, she said that there were very few times in her career as an actress that she experienced such a “give and take” between actors; that Marilyn’s tears and anguish were so real in that scene, that she (Anne) actually was reacting to Marilyn in a very real way. I should look for the quote, she says it much better than me!

    I rambled again… hehehe ;)

  17. red says:

    Ceci – Thanks for the Natasha information. If she felt threatened by Natasha’s intimacy with her, and that it could be used against her – it makes sense that she would cut all ties.

    yes, if you could find that quote from Bancroft it would be awesome. It totally reads on her face – I just love her expression there – she is almost struck dumb by Marilyn … and in that moment, she loves her the way her boyfriend loves her. She’s not jealous or standoff-ish – she is just frozen in compassion for this poor girl.

    So often in movies women are pitted against each other, you know? it’s nice to see this moment NOT go that way.

  18. Ceci says:

    I found the quote! From the Marilyn Monroe Encyclopedia (although I have read it in several other MM biographies):

    “It was a remarkable experience. Because it was one of those very few times in all my experiences in Hollywood when I felt that give and take that can only happen when you are working with good actors. There was just this scene of one woman seeing another woman who was helpless and in pain, and [Marilyn] was helpless and in pain. It was so real, I responded. I really reacted to her. She moved me so that tears came into my eyes.”

  19. red says:

    God, that is so amazing. That’s exactly what I see in her face in that last scene. Beautiful!!

  20. Happy birthday, Marilyn Monroe

    On June 1, 1926 Norma Jeane Mortenson was born. Objectified and misunderstood while alive, Marilyn Monroe has become the ultimate object in death. It’s the image – the image become reality, no more living-breathing woman … just the object. It…

  21. For sheer drama, Don’t Bother To Knock is Marilyn Monroe’s finest performances. She would have made a memorable Grushenska in The Brothers Karamazov.
    I am not so sure Lee Strasberg helped her. She lacked self confidenc and she thought Paula and Lee would assist her in acquiring it by fine tuning her marvelous inborn abilities On the contrary i think they may have harmed her fragile psyche.Stella Adler might have been a better choice. She was right there in Los Angeles. Escape from oneself is seldom the answer.
    Richard Widmark remains one of the best and sexiest actors ever. He also had a great sense of timing and sensitivity.
    Cary Grant was a marvelous dramatic actor who never received any mention anywhere except on this site. I once watched an old movie in London in which Grant plays an adoptive father who cannot seem to work hard enough to make ends meet at the height of the depression. The state wants to remove his adopted daughter because of money, what else? His performance is stunning and compelling. I found myself crying with him.
    Marilyn was playing her mother, that’s why Nell is so real.
    When Sophia Loren played a woman in her early forties at the age of 26 in a film called “Two Women” for which she won the Academy Award, she confided many years later that she was able to do it because she remembered her mother’s anguish during WWII in Naples.
    Let’s Make Love was exploitative to say the least. Actor and Singer Yves Montand, an incurable Italian born womanizer was wrong as her co-star and even worse as her off screen lover.

  22. The Books: “Marilyn: Her Life in Her Own Words : Marilyn Monroe’s Revealing Last Words and Photographs” (George Barris)

    Next book on my “entertainment biography” shelf: Marilyn: Her Life in Her Own Words : Marilyn Monroe’s Revealing Last Words and Photographs, by George Barris George Barris claims that these were the last photographs of Mariliyn Monroe before she died….

  23. David Bruce says:

    Great analysis of this film. I was particularly interested in the observation that she was rarely allowed to show anger in her movies. I’d noticed that myself, years ago, and wondered how frustrating for Monroe not to have that outlet. Apparently, in real life she was capable of towering fury when she felt–rightly or wrongly– betrayed. To stifle this natural emotion in her work, must have been a constant source of anxiety. In “Clash By Night” (a natural, fresh performance) she is feisty and smart-mouthed. She has one splendid outburst in “Bus Stop” and of course her famous (if poorly directed) screamfest in “The Misfits.” But her persona did not lend itself to anger, sarcasm or witty retort–though she was capable of all these.
    Three points on “DBTK” This performance was undercut by Monroe’s “drama coach” Natasha Lytess, who taught her that over-enunciated way of speaking. When comfortable with her material, this vocal oddity relaxed (later, under the equally onerous Stasbergs she would lose it.) Here, it comes and goes, but she is so expressive, her face and her body so emotive, you can forgive the sometimes stilted emphasis on the “d” and “t” Also–and this is vital–the director printed the first take, every time. This entire movie was a one-take wonder! Imagine if she’d had the opportunity to give some variations, take to take.
    Finally, for my money, Marilyn never looked as interesting onscreen again. The crisp, noir-ish black and white suited her. As did the darker hair (red, not brunette.) And she is given great movie-queen close-ups. It is a pity that Cinemascope later diluted her impact–though we must be grateful that “Niagara”, “Blondes” “Prince and the Showgirl” “Hot” and “Misfits” were filmed in a less confining screen ratio. In “DBTK” the camera really searches her face, rather than roam over her body.
    “DBTK” “Clash By Night” and “The Prince and the Showgirl” are the films that show what she might have done, had the times, and she herself, been different.
    Oh, one last thing. As to how she is treated by men onscreen. I have to say Yves Montand’s character respects her; she changes his outlook because she is NOT impressed by money, jewelry or fame. Of course it is a tired sex comedy in which the woman has to be tricked, but given the wretched script, dire directing and her own problems finally obvious onscreen, she offers up a likeable, normal young woman, who turns into a fleshy fantasy figure in the musical numbers–“doing” a Marilyn. No wonder she couldn’t get a handle on her career–what did they want her to be? In the end she gave in, and swam naked in the pool for “Something’s Got to Give.”
    That finale makes “DBTK” all the more powerful, poignant and important in any overview of her career.

  24. Happy birthday Marilyn Monroe!

    On June 1, 1926 Norma Jean Mortensen was born. Objectified while alive, Marilyn Monroe has become the ultimate object in death. The image has become the reality … the multitudinous icons and posters, her face and body standing in for…

  25. Joseph McCab says:

    I totally agree, 150% if possible, with every point of your writing. It’s easier to demean than to give a sound, well-observed, well-researched opinion. At times, I even think that she made a caricature of herself whenever she felt unappreciated as a human being and as an actress. I’m not saying that was a great actress in the realm of Davis, Page, Taylor, and all those serious actresses of the 40s, 50s and 60s; or the Viola Davis, Annette Bening, Julianne Moore or our days, but she had something to offer, whether it was talent as a comedienne, or simply screen magic. Also, she made mistakes in her professional career and in her personal life. In the end, all of the above conspired against her. I miss her.

  26. Elisa says:

    I just watched “Don’t Bother To Knock” and damn, I was KNOCKED OUT by Marilyn’s performance. This essay is so well written and wise about Marilyn, her career, and the movie itself. What you said about her rage–it’s true, she was not allowed to get angry in her other movies. I have a photoset of her, reading a script, etc. except in one of the photos she’s angry and pointing at someone or something. When I posted it, people said “that’s not Marilyn!” until I posted other pictures where she was doing what was expected of her.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.