The Homesman really got to me. A feminist Western. Disturbing, emotional, messy, strange.
-
Recent Posts
- “I don’t cook and I don’t care.” — Ann-Margret
- “Sometimes I think no matter how one is born, no matter how one acts, there is something out of gear with one somewhere, and that must be changed. Life at its best is a grand corrective.” –Jessie Redmon Fauset
- “I’ve had my best times trailing a Mainbocher evening gown across a sawdust floor. I’ve always loved high style in low company.” — Anita Loos
- Substack: An interview with screenwriter Bonnie Gross about her script Lady Parts
- “I would rather take a photograph than be one.” — Lee Miller
- When proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim, / Hath put a spirit of youth in everything …
- Substack: On Radu Jude’s latest, Do Not Expect Too Much From the End of the World
- “After all, when God created Adam and Eve, they were stark naked. And in the Garden of Eden, God was probably naked as a jaybird too!” — Bettie Page
- “Good acting is thinking in front of the camera. I just do that and apply a sense of humor to it. You have to trust the audience to get it.” — Charles Grodin
- “What is important is to continue believing in the Irish language as a vibrant creative power while it continues to be marginalised in the process of cultural McDonaldisation.” — poet Michael Davitt
Recent Comments
- Jay G on March 2024 Viewing Diary
- sheila on My new column at Liberties magazine: First up: acting and film criticism and how the twain meet
- sheila on My new column at Liberties magazine: First up: acting and film criticism and how the twain meet
- sheila on “I would rather take a photograph than be one.” — Lee Miller
- sheila on “I would rather take a photograph than be one.” — Lee Miller
- Clary on “I would rather take a photograph than be one.” — Lee Miller
- Lyrie on My new column at Liberties magazine: First up: acting and film criticism and how the twain meet
- sheila on “Good acting is thinking in front of the camera. I just do that and apply a sense of humor to it. You have to trust the audience to get it.” — Charles Grodin
- Stevie on “Good acting is thinking in front of the camera. I just do that and apply a sense of humor to it. You have to trust the audience to get it.” — Charles Grodin
- Bradford Lowell Drake on The Books: “Thomas Jefferson : Author of America” (Christopher Hitchens)
- David Benson on “For I, the chiefest lamp of all the earth…” — Christopher Marlowe, Tamburlaine
- Sheila on March 2024 Viewing Diary
- Biff Dorsey on March 2024 Viewing Diary
- Robert Valente on For Joseph Cotten’s birthday: Gaslight: His Listening Is Active
- Anne Whitehouse on 2023 Books Read
- sheila on My new column at Liberties magazine: First up: acting and film criticism and how the twain meet
- Jessie on My new column at Liberties magazine: First up: acting and film criticism and how the twain meet
- sheila on My new column at Liberties magazine: First up: acting and film criticism and how the twain meet
- sheila on My new column at Liberties magazine: First up: acting and film criticism and how the twain meet
- sheila on “For I am of the seed of the WELCH WOMAN and speak the truth from my heart.” Happy Birthday, Poet Christopher Smart
Categories
Archives
-
I just read this book last month. Cannot wait for this movie to hit Korea!!!
I need to read the book now – what an interesting author. I love Bless the Beasts and the Children.
Bless the Beasts and Children was Swarthout’s “answer” book to The Lord of the Flies.
Really!! How interesting! Can you tell me more?
I saw the movie when I was – 10? 9? It was on afternoon television. It upset me so much that I couldn’t sleep that night. It’s been years since I saw it but I will never forget that first experience of it. Then I took the book out of the library and read it. I was a glutton for punishment, I guess.
Also, that he also wrote Where the Boys Are??
Did a bit of Googling around and found this quote from Swarthout:
“This book has the idea that people are not bestial in nature. It is just the opposite of Lord of the Flies. The idea is, if you isolate boys with the right combination of circumstances, they will do great things. So much is now anti-hero. This is a ‘yes’ book.”
I really need to read it again – as well as his other stuff.
Did you like The Homesman, bybee? Sounds like you did, right?
Bless the Beasts and Children…That’s the quote I was thinking of, Sheila!
The Homesman was such a satisfying read. A different take on the Old West…what happens if you can’t hack prairie life? The odd pairing of the claim-jumper and the woman homesteader. The minister who conceived of the program to rescue these women…probably the most positive person of the cloth I’ve seen in fiction in decades. Nobility like in BtBaC, but Swarthout doesn’t trumpet it.
Once upon a time, about 8 years ago, I was in a used bookstore in Seoul. Saw a paperback copy (movie tie-in) of The Shootist. Passed it up. Went back next time and it was gone. Still kicking myself.
Speaking of The Shootist – Criterion just released it with another Monte Hellman Western. My friend Kim has a video-essay on Warren Oates included – very excited to take a look at it!
And I agree about the minister!! He’s the same way in the film, a truly concerned individual, who tries to figure out the best way to handle the situation. The most compassionate way. He’s not fire and brimstone. These poor women are also his congregants – they are, in his mind, under his care. He does his best.
Streep has a great cameo too – it’s real fun to see her and Jones together again after Hope Springs (which I loved).
I read your Rogerebert.com review after searching for one on Google. I went looking for an explanation of this movie which I found disturbing and, as you put it, strange. Thank you for making sense of it all and for giving me a greater appreciation of this film and its creators. I also enjoyed reading about Marilyn Monroe
Glenn! Thank you so much for seeking me out to tell me your thoughts. I am very intrigued by them. Yes: disturbing and strange … I keep coming back to it to try to parse it out, to try to be with it and its message – particularly the wacky ending – which I found very intriguing – and it took me a while to realize that it made the title make sense. It’s about him, not the women – and his relationship to them and caring for them. I’m still not sure about this – it continues to intrigue me. And how about James Spader?? What on EARTH…. I bought on DVD just so I can have it close at hand.
Thanks again for reading and commenting. I appreciate it very much!
I watched “The Homesman” recently, and then cycled back to read your beautifully written review on Ebert.
In the film, I was seriously knocked off kilter by the sudden plot twist involving Cuddy and also by the postscript at the end as her tombstone is kicked into the river. In both cases, I didn’t know how to go on as a viewer.
It seems there were acres and acres of untold grief in the old west. Thanks for shedding some light as to why.