“People say I’m a one-note actor, but the way I figure it, those other guys are just looking for that one right note.” — Joel McCrea

It’s his birthday today. Joel McCrea had a long career, with many different phases. He did it all, although he is primarily associated with Westerns. It was what you might call a “classy” career. Steady, successful, no scandals, and he seemingly had a very practical and healthy relationship to acting, to being a star. He was great in Sullivan’s Travels – he and Veronica Lake make a great pair.

My favorite of his is The More the Merrier, with Jean Arthur and Charles Coburn (who won an Oscar for his performance). This film is one of the sexiest films ever made. The kiss Arthur and McCrea share on the steps is more erotic than any sex scene featuring totally nude bodies. Her shoulder-less dress, his handsiness – he’s literally an octopus – but he knows she wants it – and then there’s the moment where she takes control, grabs his face, and SHE kisses HIM. Here’s the scene and take note of the long long LONG take, with all that talking, and all that dialogue, and all that fiery-hot subtext …

Joel McCrea is so good in this: laconic, flat-affect, non-dramatic (as compared to Jean Arthur’s overt sadness and freaked-out-ness) … so that when he admits his love for her, and calls her “dear” in the quiet scene where they’re both lying in their single beds, in separate rooms, and talking to each other through the wall … it takes your breath away.

Please read Dan Callahan’s insightful piece on McCrea.

I wrote about McCrea and Arthur’s sizzling chemistry for Film Comment.

Posted in Actors, Movies, On This Day | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

“If the thing is there, why, there it is.” Happy Birthday, Walker Evans

Sadie Tingle, Alabama, 1936.

4405761259_a37237e25d_o

walker-evans-3

8a44521r

walker_evans_03_girl_in_french_quarter_new_orleans-web

walker-evans-lunchroom-window-new-york-city-1929

6TiYiyNurqskbngdMieRglDPo1_1280

013_walker-evans_theredlist

081

360

000000.-Evans6

104701

h2_1999.237.1

49.1971

walker_evans_mujer_madre_cubana_cuba_habana

walker-evans 2

162612178_b606590d35_o

alabama-farm-kids484x384

frazier_1-110713

let-us-now-praise

old-movie-posters-walker-evans-inkbluesky

PH2797

That last photo is Walker Evans’ innovative perspective of the parade for Charles Lindbergh after Lindbergh successfully crossed the Atlantic in 1927. It’s one of the first photos Evans took, and shows that he had a “good eye” from the start. A conventional photographer would have shown the parade, the cheering crowds, the scope and size of the event, Lindbergh himself. Evans, however, was struck by the backs of the marching band, and the carnage of ticker-tape. The empty aftermath.

And the photo above that one I love in particular, since I love Carole Lombard, have that movie poster on my wall, and Carole Lombard with a shiner is my Twitter avatar.

Walker Evans captured America at a certain time of upheaval, gigantic events which had wide-sweeping consequences, for the world, yes, but more importantly, for individuals. It was a time of both technical innovation and abject poverty. He focused on American’s homes, the objects in the homes, the rusty bed-steads in the shacks of the poor and destitute, the stoves in the corner, the kitchen utensils. Beds were important. Beds represent a respite for the economically-ravaged people he photographed. But Evans, too, just had an eye for the detail, the one essential thing that would make a photograph pop. It is a remarkable record of what America looked like at the time, its cars, its billboards. Ordinary life was what he was after. You can feel the dust in the air from the unpaved roads, smell the sugary soda from the fountains, the quiet of those small towns. But he was also an urban street photographer, taking pictures of women on subways wearing little hats, gossiping, collapsed against one another during the commute, lunch rooms crowded with office workers, the vast bustle of city life. It’s an amazing archive, an incredible historical record.

In 1936, James Agee, film critic, novelist, reporter, asked Walker Evans to come down to Alabama with him to document the life of sharecroppers for Fortune magazine. Hard hard times in America, all around. Evans’ photographs (Agee and Evans stayed with three tenant-farmer families, so you get to know the faces) are haunting. The direct gaze. The dirty children. The hovels. The gaunt cheeks. The hard-bitten eyes. Evans initially felt uncomfortable with the assignment, photographing people in such misery. He worried he was exploiting them. A common issue with photographers who go into terrible areas. But the issue is two-fold: documenting horrors brings news of events to the world, makes it palpable, energizes people to “get involved”, whatever that might mean. (One remembers Kevin Carter’s horrifying photo of the starving child in the Sudan curled up on the ground with a vulture crouching nearby. While there are conflicting reports on how that photograph came to be, Carter won a Pulitzer Prize for it. It was one of those photos, like the “napalm girl” that sears into your brain once you’ve seen it. The horror of humanity. Carter committed suicide. He had photographed many horrible things, executions, torture. His suicide note spoke of not being able to bear all of the things he had seen, they had blotted out the possibility of joy. AND, as a photographer, his job was not to change things, or provide aid. It was to document, to bear witness. That’s it. This is an ethical struggle that Walker Evans felt acutely as he photographed these families in dire straits.)

The collaboration with Agee eventually became, of course, the classic of American literature/photography, Let Us Now Praise Famous Men. Agee’s prose is incantatory and emotional, free-flowing and high-flung, tapping into the human condition and the terrible beauty of our drive to survive. Here is an excerpt:

Each is drawn elsewhere toward another: once more a man and a woman, in a loneliness they are not liable at that time to notice, are tightened together upon a bed: and another family has begun:

Moreover, these flexions are taking place everywhere, like a simultaneous motion of all the waves of the water of the world: and these are the classic patterns, and this is the weaving, of human living: of whose fabric each individual is a part: and of all parts of this fabric let this be borne in mind:

Each is intimately connected with the bottom and the extremest reach of time:

Each is composed of substances identical with the substances of all that surrounds him, both the common objects of his disregard, and the hot centers of stars:

All that each person is, and experiences, and shall never experience, in body and in mind, all these things are differing expressions of himself and of one root, and are identical: not one of these things nor one of these persons is ever quite to be duplicated, nor replaced, nor has it ever quite had precedent: but each is a new and incommunicably tender life, wounded in every breath, and almost as hardly killed as easily wounded: sustaining, for a while, without defense, the enormous assaults of the universe.

Walker Evans’ contribution to the 20th century cannot be measured.

walker_evans01

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Art/Photography, On This Day | Tagged , | 19 Comments

“I’ve had the kind of fame which I felt was just the right amount.” — Lois Smith

Lois Smith, who turns 95 years old today, made her film debut in 1955, playing a young prostitute in East of Eden. She has a small scene with James Dean, and then exits the film forever. But the memory of her lingers.

In 2021, 66 years later – let me say that again – 66 years after she made her film debut – Lois Smith won a Tony for her performance in The Inheritance. She was – at age 90 – the oldest Tony winner. Her speech was amazing. Unfortunately it’s not on YouTube. The speeches of all the YOUNGER winners are on YouTube. Typical. Let us honor our history. The video is here. She was so happy, and so was the audience.

Some years ago, I was involved in a theatre workshop where we developed a play about the artist Joseph Cornell. We workshopped in one of those giant airy studios at Juilliard. We played around with format. We envisioned the play taking place IN one of Cornell’s boxes. I played the young woman who came into his life late – one of those aimless Automat girls he loved so much – and he gave her money and was obsessed with her. She ended up stealing a couple of boxes and – like a dummy-dumb – tried to sell them to New York galleries. Cornell was famous. Everyone knew him. So they called Cornell to report that a raggedy strange young woman was trying to sell his boxes. Horrible. He was devastated but refused to press charges. She had a horrible end, murdered in a hotel on the UWS. Some of the details are hazy, my research was a long time ago. A sad episode in JC’s life.

The point is: Joseph Cornell loved Lois Smith, and knew her casually, and made a box for her. It was 1955, and she was on Broadway in an adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Young and the Beautiful. This was before East of Eden dropped. Lois Smith actually has the box (unlike, say, Lauren Bacall – the box Cornell made for her is probably priceless at this point). It hangs in her hallway. In a New Yorker article, the writer, Michael Schulman, gives a description of the box:

Cornell, who knew Smith through the writer Donald Windham, cut out her image, in a white tulle gown, from the Playbill cover. “The back of it is wonderful,” Smith said recently, flipping the box to reveal papier-mâché text. “It has a quote from Hölderlin: ‘Home, poor heart, you cannot rediscover, if the dream alone does not suffice.’ ”

So back to the workshop: the director – my friend Ted – knew Lois because of her work at Steppenwolf (she’s a company member). When we both lived in Chicago, Ted and I went to see her in a new play (The Mesmerist) at Steppenwolf, and the three of us went out to dinner afterwards. I was starstruck, and so wanted to ask her about James Dean, and at first I was just trying to put together the images: the beautiful white-haired woman before me, and the girl at the bar in East of Eden – but she was so friendly, so nice, I soon forgot about being starstruck. We all just discussed the play, its problems, its triumphs, the process of development, regular old shop talk among theatre people. I’ve always loved her, but ever since that night I had dinner with her, she is a role model for any working actress. The whole thing is about the work. Success – or at least the regular meaning of the word – is truly irrelevant. It’s just work.

Later, Ted and I were both in New York, working on the Cornell project, and Lois came on as adviser for our project. She knew Joseph Cornell. She opened a lot of doors for us, including getting us into the private screening room at MoMA to watch his chopped-up and now-famous films. We were shown the JC collection, including the ones not on display.

As I said, when I met her I kept seeing her defeated pose at the bar in East of Eden, the movie that “turned me on” to acting and also moviemaking as an artform. I saw that movie at age 13. I remember wondering who she was. She made an impression, even in the bombardment of James Dean on my psyche. I memorized the name. “LOIS SMITH.” And there I was, an adult, so many years later, having dinner with her, and then, a couple years after that, talking with her about Joseph Cornell in a huge rehearsal studio at Juilliard, and it all seemed perfectly normal, a straight line between back then and now. It was as though 13-year-old me had already cleared a space for this moment.

It is a rare kind of experience. The rarest.

Thank you Lois for all of your work, for being a role model, for opening up the possibility for others what a good working career looks like – success doesn’t matter, keep doing the work, keep striving, it’s the work that matters – and also for showing an interest in our experimental open-ended project – and not just an interest – but actually HELPING us achieve our goals (one call to MoMA by Lois Smith and we were in). Thank you for taking the time out of your busy career to meet with a ragtag group of young actors to tell us stories about this artist who loved you so much.

And we loved you right back.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Actors, Movies, On This Day | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Dynamic Duo #45

Universal makeup genius Jack Pierce applying the iconic makeup he designed onto Boris Karloff.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“I was never afraid of failure, for I would sooner fail than not to be among the greatest.” –John Keats

I was just beautifying him, don’t you know. A thing of beauty, don’t you know. Yeats says, or I mean, Keats says.
– James Joyce, Ulysses

Born in 1795 on this day, John Keats was orphaned at fifteen. Because his father’s finances were in a wreck, Keats always had to struggle for money. He thought of going into medicine and apprenticed himself to a surgeon. At the same time, he began to write. He was inspired by other people, he was suggestible. Example:

Continue reading

Posted in Books, James Joyce, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

Trailer for The Art and Making of Frankenstein, by me.

@frankensteingdt

Now available: THE ART AND MAKING OF FRANKENSTEIN, the official companion to Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein. ⚡️ Offering a behind-the-scenes look at how Mary Shelley’s classic was reimagined for the screen, featuring an introduction by Guillermo del Toro and a foreword by Oscar Isaac. Get your copy now from Insight Editions.

♬ original sound – Frankenstein

(The trailer’s not “by me”. It’s by Insight Editions.)

Sound on. Very dramatic!

Available for purchase!

Posted in Books, Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Dynamic Duo #44

Hayley Mills and Elvis Presley

Posted in Actors, Music | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Publication day: The Art and Making of Frankenstein

The long-awaited day is finally here. My book, The Art and Making of Frankenstein, is now available for purchase. I got my copy yesterday. I let Frankie inspect the package first. (It’s a coincidence my cat is named Frankie, short for Frankenstein? I have had Frankenstein on the brain for almost two years. So it just feels perfect.)

It’s been a wild couple of weeks. I attended the New York premiere last week, and went to the after-party, held at the Tiffany & Co. landmark store on 5th Avenue. (Tiffany donated and designed jewelry for the film. Read the book to learn more!) The most surreal moment occurred when I said hello to Jacob Elordi. I said, “Hi, I wrote the book, we spoke last fall” – he then recognized me and called a friend over, gesturing at me, saying, “She wrote the book!!” Then they both started complimenting me on my book. It was HIS premiere night, and he was complimenting ME on my accomplishment. I said it before. He’s a kind and thoughtful person. But still. Life is like a dream.

I have a couple of events planned for November, book-related, but I am also going on an artists’ retreat next week, for some way overdue R&R. R&R yes but we are also being intentional about creating community in our current nightmare. We want to nurture artistic collaboration and create space for vulnerability and connection, things we will need in the coming storm. Things that cannot be monetized, owned, or co-opted. Gathering together with these people – we have all known each other since we were 20somethings in the Chicago theatre scene – could not come at a more perfect time.

Opening the package yesterday was a proud moment. I wish my father was here, but it’s okay. Or, I’m deciding to be okay about it. My mother has lived to see this moment. I dedicated the book to her.

Posted in Books, Movies, Personal | Tagged , | 12 Comments

“let me live, love, and say it well in good sentences.” — Sylvia Plath

It’s her birthday today. She always hated her birthdays, “looked forward” to them with grim white-knuckling determination.

I have “had a relationship” with her my whole life. I discovered her at 15, like a lot of girls do, and took to her right away. I devoured every single thing I could get my hands on. I continued to revisit her work over the years, and as I changed, so, too, did the work. It’s wild. It looks one way to a 15 year old, and one way to a 35 year old, and etc. I am just happy that I lived long enough for her two-volume full correspondence to be published – a GOLDMINE. The Letters of Sylvia Plath Volume 1: 1940-1956, and The Letters of Sylvia Plath Vol 2: 1956-1963. For such a major figure of American letters, it is a DISGRACE that there hasn’t been more “out there” in the public realm, letters and journals (don’t even get me STARTED on the debacle with those). Now let’s not get it twisted: I’m not talking about her reputation. She is one of the most famous American poets who has ever lived, and anyone who claims she is somehow underrated has an axe to grind and is not to be trusted. She’s basically the James Dean of American letters, and more ink has been spilled over every single word she ever wrote than most other poets attract in a lifetime. What I AM saying – in terms of there not being much “out there” – is that the Plath estate – run by Ted Hughes (but mostly run by Ted’s sister Olwyn – who always hated Sylvia) – was so draconian, so imperious, that nobody was ever allowed to publish anything or quote anything, without going through them first. The estate put the kibosh on ANY inquiry that may have “hurt the children” or whatever. It had a completely chilling effect on Plath scholarship: there hasn’t really been ANY proper biographies of her, either. She died in 1963, for God’s sake. She’s a MAJOR poet. Janet Malcolm wrote a whole BOOK about the challenges of writing about Sylvia Plath considering the state of the estate. This stasis all changed with the death of Ted and Olwyn – and then Ted and Sylvia’s daughter Frieda took over the estate, and we are seeing the results of that thaw. So now, for the first time, we could read Plath’s correspondence – to someone OTHER than her mother – and see what she was like with multiple people, not just the people-pleasing A-student she always had to be with her mother.

That correspondence was an absolute eye-opener for this lifelong fan. I honestly thought I had a grip on her. Turns out I was wrong. As I read the letters from December 1962 into January 1963, where she describes Ted helping her find an apartment in London, letters to her friend Marcia who was planning a trip to visit in March, all of these letters to editors and radio producers and all the rest … I found myself for the very first time NOT taking her suicide as a foregone conclusion. I actually thought at one point, “I think she’s gonna pull through this.” And then I remembered.

The correspondence is that powerful and that revelatory.

One of the many revelations in those volumes was what a massive movie fan Plath was. I never knew!! Why has this information been KEPT from us. Aurelia Plath edited out ALL of Plath’s comments on the movies she was seeing, 3, 4 a week sometimes. Why Aurelia would do that is anyone’s guess. Since for 40 years we have ONLY had the heavily-edited correspondence with her mother – where Sylvia often put a bright spin on things (understandable) – AND because Aurelia saw fit to leave so much out … well, you can’t know what you don’t know. Reading Sylvia’s letters, gushing about this or that movie, gave me a whole new perspective. She got a babysitter so she could go see Ingmar Bergman’s Through a Glass Darkly.

Anyway, I won’t go on and on because I wrote about this newfound knowledge of Plath’s cinephilia in my column at Film Comment. As far as I know I am still the only person to have dug into Sylvia’s cinephilia. (This is the first time I’ve ever been able to say that about any topic I’ve written about. Someone ALWAYS got there before you … but here, since for whatever reason, Sylvia’s mother edited OUT all the references to movies in the letters Sylvia wrote – none of us had any idea how big a movie buff she was.)

I rarely think “I was BORN to write this piece” but in this case, I did. I’d been preparing for this one since I was in high school.

Sylvia Plath Goes to the Movies.
 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Books, Music, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

“Out of the inevitable conflict of images – … the womb of war – I try to make that momentary peace which is a poem.” — poet Dylan Thomas

“[My] poems, with all their crudities, doubts and confusions, are written for the love of Man and in praise of God, and I’d be a damn fool if they weren’t.” – Dylan Thomas, 1952

Dylan Thomas was born on this day.

I got a chance to write about him when I reviewed Last Call, a gruesome “experimental” film about his last day. No thank you. But at least I got to write about him, because his trajectory is really interesting, particularly his (perhaps) outsized fame and the impact he had on a generation of writers. It took some writers years to shake off his powerful influence. Thomas was a brilliant performer … a lot of his contemporaries saw this as a sham, that there wasn’t much there beyond his voice/performing. Thomas felt uneasy about this himself (which you can hear in the collection of quotes at the bottom). Thomas’ star has fallen, a bit, but in his day he was IT.

Continue reading

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments