{"id":108271,"date":"2003-03-25T06:42:55","date_gmt":"2003-03-25T11:42:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=108271"},"modified":"2015-10-18T10:45:03","modified_gmt":"2015-10-18T14:45:03","slug":"get-rid-of-should-and-must","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=108271","title":{"rendered":"Get Rid of &#8220;Should&#8221; and &#8220;Must&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Great great piece in Slate today, analyzing the language of &#8220;should&#8221; and &#8220;must&#8221; on the NY Times editorial page. Fascinating stuff, regardless of your political leanings. This is an article about language itself. Howell Raines brought back the banned words &#8220;should&#8221; and &#8220;must&#8221;, and yet still resists letting the <em>New York Times<\/em> make a big statement about its position. It can&#8217;t really, because it is the #1 paper in the world, and if the war happens, and if it is a rousing success, then all of their gloom-and-doom predictions will end up looking like defeatist claptrap &#8230; so they undermine, they second-guess, they hedge, they withhold support and enthusiasm. <\/p>\n<p>But what I like about this article is the discussion of the language itself. And what words like &#8220;should&#8221; and &#8220;must&#8221; really have done to the integrity of the <em>New York Times<\/em> op-ed page. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A decade ago, the New York Times editorial page editor Jack Rosenthal banned his writers from using the words should and must. Rosenthal claimed his &#8220;silly, stupid rule had a magical effect&#8221; on editorial writers, forcing them to rely on logic, not assertion, to persuade readers. Rosenthal told George magazine&#8217;s Timothy Noah that if he didn&#8217;t ban the words, he risked running editorials tainted by &#8220;this foot stomping, childish petulance. &#8230;. &#8216;You must, by God, because we said so, and we&#8217;re the fucking New York Times.&#8217; &#8221; <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Slate analyses one of the most recent op-eds about war with Iraq, where the language is so clouded, and hemmy and haw-ey, that it is hard to tell what the hell is going on. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But what if the United Nations doesn&#8217;t do what the Times thinks it &#8220;should&#8221; or &#8220;must&#8221; do? The nation&#8217;s most prestigious newspaper takes a powder, retreating from the insistent voice\u2014in which it advises the Bush administration to provide world &#8220;leadership&#8221; with its &#8220;power&#8221;\u2014to a pathetically passive tone. &#8220;But in the end, sometime in March, the United States may have to decide whether it should do the job on its own,&#8221; the editorial allows. <\/p>\n<p>OK, but when the United States approaches that Rubicon, does the Times recommend we cross it? Not precisely. If this editorial were a football game, the zebras would penalize the Times for delay of game. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Great great piece in Slate today, analyzing the language of &#8220;should&#8221; and &#8220;must&#8221; on the NY Times editorial page. Fascinating stuff, regardless of your political leanings. This is an article about language itself. Howell Raines brought back the banned words &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=108271\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[174,141],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108271"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=108271"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108271\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":108272,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108271\/revisions\/108272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=108271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=108271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=108271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}