{"id":190,"date":"2003-11-11T10:10:43","date_gmt":"2003-11-11T15:10:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=190"},"modified":"2024-10-27T14:54:20","modified_gmt":"2024-10-27T18:54:20","slug":"100-greatest-novels-of-all-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=190","title":{"rendered":"100 Greatest Novels of All Time"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230; <a href=\"http:\/\/observer.guardian.co.uk\/review\/story\/0,6903,1061037,00.html\">as chosen by The Observer<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I have read 37 of them.<\/p>\n<p>But, of course, being obnoxious, I have a couple of comments about some of the books:<\/p>\n<p><i>The Executioner&#8217;s Song<\/i>?  What?  To have THAT book be on there and not <i>In Cold Blood<\/i> (Truman Capote invented the genre, and Norman Mailer stole it) is very bizarre.  I didn&#8217;t think <i>The Executioner&#8217;s Song<\/i> was that great a book &#8211; definitely not one of the greatest novels of all time.  That seems baffling to me.<\/p>\n<p>Second of all:  neither of those are novels.  They are true-crime books.  They are dressed up as novels, which was the whole &#8220;gimmick&#8221; of them &#8211; but Truman Capote got there first, and <i>In Cold Blood<\/i> is a much better book.  Please don&#8217;t even argue.<\/p>\n<p>I was completely gratified to see <i>Charlotte&#8217;s Web<\/i> on there.<\/p>\n<p>I have huge gaps in my reading &#8211; stuff which must be rectified.<\/p>\n<p>I haven&#8217;t read any Paul Auster.  I haven&#8217;t read any George Eliot (which I know is completely shameful &#8211; she is DEFINITELY on my list).<\/p>\n<p>I have read <i>Pilgrim&#8217;s Progress<\/i> of all things, but I haven&#8217;t read any Philip Roth.  Please don&#8217;t kill me.<\/p>\n<p>I have not read <i>David Copperfield<\/i>, strangely, although I have read <i>Oliver Twist<\/i>, <i>Great Expectations<\/i>, <i>Christmas Carol<\/i> and <i>Bleak House<\/i>.  How did I read all of those and miss <i>David Copperfield<\/i>, which everybody talks about as his best?<\/p>\n<p>I have never heard of the book <i>Sybil<\/i>, by Disraeli.  Sue me.<\/p>\n<p>I haven&#8217;t read any Trollope, and I haven&#8217;t read any Wilkie Collins.<\/p>\n<p>I have read all of the Bronte books numerous times.  I have read all of James Joyce.<\/p>\n<p>I, somehow, embarrassingly, have not read any Faulkner.  This is horrifying, I know.  Faulkner is on my eternal list &#8211; I own all his books, but I haven&#8217;t read them.<\/p>\n<p>I have read <i>Crime and Punishment<\/i>, but I have NOT read <i>The Brothers Karamazov<\/i> &#8211; which, I believe, is one of my dad&#8217;s all-time favorite novels.<\/p>\n<p>Glad to see <i>Catch-22<\/i> on there.  In my opinion, it should be #1.<\/p>\n<p>I have read <i>Portrait of a Lady<\/i> but it left me cold.  I mean &#8230; I liked some of it &#8230; I liked how much of it was conversation &#8211; not a lot of description, but just long long passages of people talking to each other &#8211; fighting, jostling for position &#8230; But Henry James remains opaque to me.  I will grant him his space in the canon (I&#8217;m sure he is happy to have my endorsement), but so far, I have been unable to &#8220;go there&#8221; with him.<\/p>\n<p>I like the passionate wild books better.  The <i>Wuthering Heights<\/i>.  The <i>Anna Kareninas<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>I have never read <i>Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde<\/i>, and yet I HAVE read <i>Three Men in a Boat<\/i>, which I thought was abysmal, but that is probably only because I was in a dreadful musical adaptation of the book, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=70\">described in this post here<\/a>.  The production was so awful that one critic started off his review with the following words: &#8220;Not since the Titanic has there been such a nautical disaster&#8230;&#8221;  So I despise <i>Three Men in a Boat<\/i>.  I think it&#8217;s a stupid book.<\/p>\n<p>I have only read Joseph Conrad&#8217;s <i>Heart of Darkness<\/i> &#8211; have not read <i>Nostromo<\/i>, which appears on the list, and is called Conrad&#8217;s &#8220;masterpiece&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Never read any Ford Madox Ford.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve read all of DH Lawrence and I know this is sacreligious &#8211; but &#8230; I guess I didn&#8217;t get it.  Perhaps I was too young when I read them.  Maybe I should go back and try them again.<\/p>\n<p>I think <i>Howard&#8217;s End<\/i> is a far superior book to <i>Passage to India<\/i>, but I could be persuaded otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>I have had Gunter Grass&#8217; <i>The Tin Drum<\/i> sitting un-read on my bookshelf for nigh on 15 years now.  My best friend Mitchell read it and it blew his mind &#8211; He could not stop talking about it.  But it&#8217;s one of those books I haven&#8217;t gotten around to yet.<\/p>\n<p>And :  <i>Housekeeping<\/i>? Gimme a break.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, and one other subjective comment: <i>Oscar and Lucinda<\/i> by Peter Carey has no business being on that list, in my opinion.  I had to force myself to finish that book.  I know everybody fawned over it, and loved it, and praised it, but I thought it was over-praised.  Some of the writing was okay &#8211; and the plot itself was fascinating (carrying a glass church over hundreds of miles) but &#8230; whatEVER.  The book didn&#8217;t work for me.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, if you haven&#8217;t read Primo Levi&#8217;s <i>The Periodic Table<\/i> &#8211; you really must.  However: it&#8217;s a <b>memoir<\/b>.  It&#8217;s not a novel.  So &#8230; why is it on this list?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230; as chosen by The Observer. I have read 37 of them. But, of course, being obnoxious, I have a couple of comments about some of the books: The Executioner&#8217;s Song? What? To have THAT book be on there and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=190\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[15,28],"tags":[983,102,104,745,77,697,240,992,105,2208,75,266,974,35,2215,96,676,150,1042],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=190"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":194839,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190\/revisions\/194839"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}