{"id":59591,"date":"2025-10-21T09:00:12","date_gmt":"2025-10-21T13:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=59591"},"modified":"2026-04-13T20:19:22","modified_gmt":"2026-04-14T00:19:22","slug":"happy-birthday-samuel-taylor-coleridge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=59591","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;My thoughts bustle along like a Surinam toad, with little toads sprouting out of back, side, and belly, vegetating while it crawls.&#8221; &#8212; Samuel Taylor Coleridge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?attachment_id=28167\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-28167\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/10\/col.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"col\" width=\"278\" height=\"350\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-28167\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/10\/col.jpg 278w, https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/10\/col-79x100.jpg 79w, https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/10\/col-158x200.jpg 158w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 278px) 100vw, 278px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\n<big>He looked at his own Soul<br \/>\nwith a telescope. What seemed<br \/>\nall irregular, he saw and<br \/>\nshewed to be beautiful<br \/>\nConstellations: and he added<br \/>\nto the Consciousness hidden<br \/>\nworlds within worlds.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;Samuel Taylor Coleridge, <em>Notebooks<\/em><\/big><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s his birthday today. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll start with a personal anecdote because Coleridge entered my life early. <\/p>\n<p>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>\nWhen I was 9, 10 years old, I loved a book called <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0807210625?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=thesheivari-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0807210625\">The Boyhood of Grace Jones<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=thesheivari-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0807210625\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" style=\"border:none !important; margin:0px !important;\" \/><\/i>, by Jane Langton (Langton wrote one of my favorite books ever called <i><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0064400425\/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0064400425&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=thesheivari-20&#038;linkId=DLSQIEQEESHD5M77\">The Diamond in the Window<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/e\/ir?t=thesheivari-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0064400425\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" style=\"border:none !important; margin:0px !important;\" \/><\/i>). <i>The Boyhood of Grace Jones<\/i> takes place in 1939, and tells the story of a young girl named Grace Jones about to start middle school who has taken to wearing her father&#8217;s Navy middy blouse. She cuts her hair short, and decides to behave like a boy. I cannot tell you how much I related to this as a child. I dressed &#8220;like a boy&#8221; too. Grace is obsessed with all things sea-worthy, and has a couple of imaginary sailor friends, Captain Nancy and Captain John. <\/p>\n<p>Entering middle school, though, changes everything. The sexes separate, drastically. The girls are all in a state of apoplexy over Rhett Butler (<i>Gone With the Wind<\/i> premiered), and Grace refuses to buy into ANY of it, much to the consternation of her mother and some of her teachers. Why does she dress like a boy? Why does she swagger through the hallways shouting, &#8220;Ahoy there, matey?&#8221; Why doesn&#8217;t she have a crush on Clark Gable? <\/p>\n<p>I was in love with Grace. She follows her obsessions to extremes. I knew a little something about that. Everything changes, again, for Grace, when, in English class, the teacher assigns a poem. It is &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221;, by Samuel Taylor Coleridge.<\/p>\n<p>And something happens to Grace Jones when she reads it.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Dizzy with incantation, intoxicated with rhythm, Grace almost fell out of the tree. She had discovered poetry and nature in one fell swoop. &#8220;Beware,&#8221; she whispered to herself, &#8220;Beware! Beware! Weave a circle round him thrice &#8230;&#8221; Then her eyes raced back to the beginning of the poem, and she started to read the whole thing aloud once more, mumbling and whispering at first, then ranting and shouting &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>By the time Grace noticed her dog Whitey at the bottom of the tree, sniffling and whining a doggy greeting, the two mimeographed pages in her hand were a damp smudge of purple ink. She never discovered the questions Mrs. Humminger had typed up on the second page, but she wouldn&#8217;t have been able to read them anyway, they were so blurred by now. But she knew the whole poem by heart. She slipped and fumbled down the tree, fondled Whitey, staggered home, burst into the kitchen door, struck a pose, and cried, &#8220;Beware! Beware! My flashing eyes! My floating hair!&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This was a heroine I could recognize. I did that kind of stuff too. I would read something and get so excited that I immediately needed to play make-believe with it. I had never heard of Samuel Taylor Coleridge when I was 10 years old. <i>The Boyhood of Grace Jones<\/i> introduced me to him.  <\/p>\n<p>Grace&#8217;s obsession goes through the roof when the class is assigned &#8220;The Rime of the Ancient Mariner&#8221;. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>The Ancient Mariner<\/i> was even more staggering than <i>Kubla Khan<\/i>. There wasn&#8217;t the slightest breeze moving in the top of the white pine tree, but Grace had to hang on with both arms to the branches on either side of her to keep from losing her balance, as Coleridge&#8217;s verses reeled and throbbed, ebbed and flowed across the pages of the book wedged open in her lap. The ancient mariner had shot a lucky bird, an albatross, with his crossbow, and ever since then his ship has been doomed with a curse.  And what a curse! All the other sailors died, one by one, and after that he was alone.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>Alone, alone, all, all alone,<br \/>\nAlone on a wide, wide sea!<br \/>\nAnd never a saint took pity on<br \/>\nMy soul in agony.<\/p>\n<p>The many men, so beautiful!<br \/>\nAnd they all dead did lie:<br \/>\nAnd a thousand thousand slimy things<br \/>\nLived on; and so did I.<br \/>\n&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br \/>\nAn orphan&#8217;s curse would drag to hell<br \/>\nA spirit from on high;<br \/>\nBut oh! more horrible than that<br \/>\nIs the curse in a dead man&#8217;s eye!<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There was something about the rhythm. It burned and froze. It beat and pulsed. It surged and dragged. It made Grace want to laugh and cry &#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I mean, this is in a book for kids. Amazing. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Grace began to learn this poem by heart too. It was easy. The verses beat themselves into her brain like hammerblows, leaving deep dents in her memory. By the time she was ready to climb down from the top of the tree and stumble home, stiff with cold, the dry grass of the field, like a dull mirror, was giving back the tawny color of the sunset sky. She had memorized forty-two stanzas.  And that night at home she learned forty more while she was eating her supper and washing the dishes. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Later that night, Grace is so worked up about the Ancient Mariner that she can&#8217;t sleep.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>She lay looking up at the cold moon, which was sailing high in the night sky, sucking the summer warmth from the ground, casting a cold, bald light on the floor beside the bed. The radiator hissed and knocked. The powerful rhythms of <i>The Ancient Mariner<\/i> were still tumbling and racing through her head. She couldn&#8217;t stop them. After the third time through all of the eighty-four stanzas she had learned that day she sat up warily, turning away from the window, and stared wide-eyed at the darkest corner of her room, where the open door into the hall cast a dense shadow. What if an angel should appear there, writing in a book of gold? Was it true that someone was keeping track? Watching her? Writing it all down on the good or bad side of the page? That would be terrible. It would be much worse to have an angel watching her than Captain Nancy or Captain John, because Nancy and John were her friends, after all, and they weren&#8217;t writing it all down like that and holding a lot of things against her forever after.<\/p>\n<p>Grace kept her eyes pricked open, staring as hard as she could at the dark corner, trying by sheer force of will to materialize an angel writing in a book of gold. But she couldn&#8217;t do it, and she slumped back under the covers.<\/p>\n<p><i>Was<\/i> it true? Were angels true? Was God true? Grace wondered about God for the thousandth time. Her father didn&#8217;t believe in religion. He scoffed at the Sunday morning preachers on the radio. He always said the word &#8220;God&#8221; sarcastically, so that it came out &#8220;<i>Gawd<\/i>&#8220;. But Grace didn&#8217;t know whether he was right or not. What if he were wrong? Somebody in the family should take some responsibility about religion. Just in case it <i>was<\/i> true. Somebody, <i>somebody<\/i>, should pray for everybody. Grace shut her eyes and put her folded hands under her chin, and prayed for them all (just in case), ending up with a line from <i>The Ancient Mariner<\/i>, &#8220;&#8216;O, shrive me, shrive me, holy man!  Amen.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BANG! exploded the radiator. <i>Bubblety-gurglety-poppety-BANG!<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Jane Langton is a great writer.<\/p>\n<p>In the back of this magic book the entirety of the texts of the two Coleridge poems referenced printed, Kubla Khan and The Ancient Mariner. And so I, a child, caught up in Grace&#8217;s enthusiasm, read them over and over and over again until I, too, had them memorized. Grace&#8217;s obsessions are free-range. All she wants is to be inspired. Over the course of the book, things shift. It is the beginning of adolescence, and she finds herself caught up in the <i>Gone With the Wind<\/i> mania. Clark Gable competes with Coleridge. It&#8217;s such a wonderful book. I highly recommend it!<\/p>\n<p>This was my introduction to Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and it was almost like a master-class in HOW to read him. We read &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221; in high school, and all I could think about was Grace Jones! <\/p>\n<p>Coleridge described the famous &#8220;person from Porlock&#8221; incident &#8211; the knock on the door that interrupted the composing of the poem &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221; &#8211; in an introduction to the published poem of &#8220;Kubla Khan.&#8221; Coleridge writes of himself in the third person: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On awakening he appeared to himself to have a distinct recollection of the whole, and taking his pen, ink, and paper, instantly and eagerly wrote down the lines that are here preserved. At this moment he was unfortunately called out by a person on business from Porlock, and detained by him above an hour, and on his return to his room, found, to his no small surprise and mortification, that though he still retained some vague and dim recollection of the general purport of the vision, yet, with the exception of some eight or ten scattered lines and images, all the rest had passed away like the images on the surface of a stream into which a stone has been cast, but, alas! without the after restoration of the latter!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This whole anecdote is a wonderful metaphor for the elusive nature of creativity, as well as the delusional dream-palace erected in our heads of the perfect work of art, fully realized. Everything falls short of that imagined paradise. (Scroll down for Stevie Smith&#8217;s poem on the &#8220;person from Porlock.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>Coleridge started taking opium because of a toothache, and it became a lifelong addiction. He went to Cambridge. He was not particularly ambitious. He didn&#8217;t get a degree. He got swept up by the French Revolution, like all of his generation did, and fostered all kinds of idealistic Utopian plans\/hopes. Like many, he somehow missed the ensuing Terror and its implications. He started publishing poems, his marriage was bad, he met Wordsworth, one of the most important friendships of his life. They collaborated, and the publication of their <i>Lyrical Ballads<\/i> marks the beginning of the Romantic era. The collaboration pushed Coleridge to produce more. <\/p>\n<p>He was invigorated, despite his other circumstances (opium, terrible marriage, a melancholy disposition).  He wrote a lot and Wordsworth was his main audience. He traveled to Germany, and was swept away by the philosophical revolution occurring there. When he returned, he settled down near Wordsworth, and began a life of hardship and opium addiction. He struggled mightily. He was always on the brink of disaster. Real disaster came when he and Wordsworth quarreled in 1810. The friendship was never quite the same again and the loss hit Coleridge hard. His gigantic prose book, <i>Biographia Literaria<\/i>, came out in 1817. As important as he was as a poet, he is equally important as a literary critic. I have always found his observations indispensable. He died in 1834. <\/p>\n<p>One more personal anecdote. When I was in high school, Frankie Goes to Hollywood hit the airwaves. &#8220;Relax&#8221; was, of course, the big hit. I bought the album, and there was another song included called &#8220;Welcome To the Pleasure-Dome&#8221;, which also eventually got radio play. I felt like the smartest person in the world because I immediately knew it referenced Coleridge&#8217;s &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221;.  <\/p>\n<p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/SVDC6kPCkWA\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>\nThe poem had, by that point, entered into my personal lexicon because of Grace Jones. So often when you read literature, especially as a kid, it stays <i>outside<\/i> of you. It may make an impression but it doesn&#8217;t enter into your experience and your language and your thought process.  But Coleridge did. And the things that imprint on you when you&#8217;re a kid stay imprinted.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Through caverns measureless to man<br \/>\nDown to a sunless sea.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That one phrase alone starts off a series of images in my mind &#8230; it never gets stale, I&#8217;m not USED to it at ALL. Picturing the &#8220;measureless&#8221; caverns brings a shiver of dread and awe (like, I beg you, please &#8230; measure them.) and then there&#8217;s the &#8220;sunless sea&#8221;, a terrifying mental picture. A sea deep beneath the earth. Untouched by sun. There are also complex and specific language elements here, the alliteration which gives those lines a sibilant sound, adding to the creepiness. The creepinesssssssssss. <\/p>\n<p>And so, let&#8217;s read the whole thing, once more, in honor of the Birthday Boy. <\/p>\n<p><big><b>Kubla Khan<\/b><\/big><\/p>\n<p>In Xanadu did Kubla Khan<br \/>\nA stately pleasure-dome decree:<br \/>\nWhere Alph, the sacred river, ran<br \/>\nThrough caverns measureless to man<br \/>\nDown to a sunless sea.<\/p>\n<p>So twice five miles of fertile ground<br \/>\nWith walls and towers were girdled round:<br \/>\nAnd there were gardens bright with sinuous rills,<br \/>\nWhere blossomed many an incense-bearing tree;<br \/>\nAnd here were forests ancient as the hills,<br \/>\nEnfolding sunny spots of greenery.<\/p>\n<p>But oh! that deep romantic chasm which slanted<br \/>\nDown the green hill athwart a cedarn cover!<br \/>\nA savage place! as holy and enchanted<br \/>\nAs e&#8217;er beneath a waning moon was haunted<br \/>\nBy woman wailing for her demon-lover!<br \/>\nAnd from this chasm, with ceaseless turmoil seething,<br \/>\nAs if this earth in fast thick pants were breathing,<br \/>\nA mighty fountain momently was forced:<br \/>\nAmid whose swift half-intermitted burst<br \/>\nHuge fragments vaulted like rebounding hail,<br \/>\nOr chaffy grain beneath the thresher&#8217;s flail:<br \/>\nAnd &#8216;mid these dancing rocks at once and ever<br \/>\nIt flung up momently the sacred river.<br \/>\nFive miles meandering with a mazy motion<br \/>\nThrough wood and dale the sacred river ran,<br \/>\nThen reached the caverns measureless to man,<br \/>\nAnd sank in tumult to a lifeless ocean:<br \/>\nAnd &#8216;mid this tumult Kubla heard from far<br \/>\nAncestral voices prophesying war!<\/p>\n<p>The shadow of the dome of pleasure<br \/>\nFloated midway on the waves;<br \/>\nWhere was heard the mingled measure<br \/>\nFrom the fountain and the caves.<br \/>\nIt was a miracle of rare device,<br \/>\nA sunny pleasure-dome with caves of ice!<\/p>\n<p>A damsel with a dulcimer<br \/>\nIn a vision once I saw:<br \/>\nIt was an Abyssinian maid,<br \/>\nAnd on her dulcimer she played,<br \/>\nSinging of Mount Abora.<br \/>\nCould I revive within me<br \/>\nHer symphony and song,<br \/>\nTo such a deep delight &#8216;twould win me<br \/>\nThat with music loud and long<br \/>\nI would build that dome in air,<br \/>\nThat sunny dome! those caves of ice!<br \/>\nAnd all who heard should see them there,<br \/>\nAnd all should cry, Beware! Beware!<br \/>\nHis flashing eyes, his floating hair!<br \/>\nWeave a circle round him thrice,<br \/>\nAnd close your eyes with holy dread,<br \/>\nFor he on honey-dew hath fed<br \/>\nAnd drunk the milk of Paradise.<\/p>\n<p>I have no idea if anyone ever reads all these compiled quotes which I append to most of these literary posts, but I sure love doing them. I used to keep notebooks full of cool or memorable quotes &#8211; not so much anymore &#8211; but quotations &#8211; a commonplace book, if you will &#8211; is one of the ways I help make sense of the world. (This is one of the reasons I found Walter Benjamin&#8217;s work so fascinating. His view on quotations is just &#8230; way WAY out there, and one of the more in-depth explorations of what removing quotes from their initial context does, and signifies). I also think all of this reading and note-taking and list-making on my part has been &#8211; unconsciously &#8211; a way to educate myself. I didn&#8217;t study literature in college. My &#8220;required reading&#8221; stopped when I left high school and studied acting. So &#8230; all of this &#8220;canon&#8221; stuff, I basically read on my own time, powered by my own steam. No teacher told me how to interpret things. There is almost no academia in my approach. So I&#8217;ve had to put together timelines on my own, put together &#8220;movements&#8221; and how one person influenced another, and yadda yadda. It&#8217;s an ongoing process. One can never learn enough, you know. A lifetime is way too short. I knew and loved Coleridge dating back to Grace Jones &#8211; but never really dug in further. Finally, last year (or the year before?) I read his magnum opus <i>Biographia Literaria<\/i> &#8211; which was an experience and a HALF. I&#8217;ll probably never read it again but I took COPIOUS notes. Every page was overflowing with insight. In terms of quote-gathering: Coleridge is such an influential man &#8211; during his lifetime and on into now &#8211; that everyone talks about him. Still. He was gossiped about during his lifetime, and people still gossip now. This is just a smidgeon of what is out there. I used to keep obsessive lists of &#8230; basically the category was: &#8220;What Writers Say About Other Writers&#8221;. I still love that category. So most of this comes from that kind of endeavor. Coleridge, like Byron, sure gets people talking. <\/p>\n<p>So here&#8217;s a little bit of what they say. <\/p>\n<p><big><strong>QUOTES:<\/strong><\/big><\/p>\n<p><strong>Regimental Muster Roll (when Coleridge enlisted he gave a fake name): <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Discharged S.T. Comberbache, Insane; 10 April 1794.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Rudyard Kipling on John Keats and Samuel Taylor Coleridge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>These are the pure Magic. These are the clear vision. The rest is only poetry.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Michael Schmidt, <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0756752418?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=thesheivari-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0756752418\">Lives of the Poets<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=thesheivari-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0756752418\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" style=\"border:none !important; margin:0px !important;\" \/><\/i>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Coleridge&#8217;s life is one of the saddest in English poetry.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge, letter to a friend: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I remember, that at eight years old I walked with [my father] one winter evening from a farmer&#8217;s house, a mile from Ottery&#8211;&#038; he told me the names of the stars&#8211;and how Jupiter was a thousand times larger than our world&#8211;and that the other twinkling stars were Suns that had worlds rolling round them&#8211;&#038; when I came home, he shewed me how they rolled round&#8230; my mind had been habituated <em>to the Vast<\/em>&#8211;&#038; I never regarded <em>my senses<\/em> in any way as the criteria of my belief.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Richard Holmes: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>He began to live a kind of double life at Cambridge, his wild expenditure on books, drinking, violin lessons, theatre and whoring (he later described this as the time of his &#8220;unchastities&#8221;) alternating with fits of suicidal gloom and remorse&#8230;By the end of October [1793] his &#8220;Embarrassments&#8221; buzzed round him &#8220;like a Nest of Hornets&#8221;, and in November he gave up all attempts to get his affairs under control. Instead he abandoned himself to a whirl of drunken socializing, alternating with grim solitary resolutions to shoot himself as the final solution to bad debts, unrequited love, and academic disgrace.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Charles Lamb, &#8220;Christ&#8217;s Hospital Thirty-five years ago&#8221;, remembering his old schoolmate:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Come back into memory, like as thou wert in the dayspring of thy fancies, with hope like a fiery column before thee&#8211;the dark pillar not yet turned&#8211;Samuel Taylor Coleridge&#8211;Logician, Metaphysician, Bard!&#8211; How have I seen the casual passer through the Cloisters stand still, entranced with admiration (while he weighed the disproportion between the <i>speech<\/i> and the <i>garb<\/i> of the young Mirandula) to hear thee unfold, in thy deep and sweet intonations, the mysteries of Jamblichus, or Plotinus (for even in those years thou waxedst not pale at such philosophic draughts) or reciting Homer in his Greek, or Pindar&#8211;while the walls of the old Grey Friars re-echoed to the accents of the <i>inspired charity boy<\/i>!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The pith of my system is to make the senses out of the mind &#8211; not the mind out of the senses, as Locke did.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>William Hazlitt, friend to Coleridge, wrote:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Coleridge has told me that he himself liked to compose in walking over uneven ground, or breaking through the straggling branches of a copse-wood; whereas Wordsworth always wrote (if he could) walking up and down a straight gravel-walk, or in some spot where the continuity of his voice met with no collateral interruption.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Miss Charlotte Poole, letter: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Tom Poole has a friend with him of the name of Coldridge: a young man of b rilliant understanding, great eloquence, desperate fortune, democratick principles, and entirely led away by the feelings of the moment.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Lord Byron, letter to John Murray, September 30, 1816<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Christabel&#8221;&#8211; I won&#8217;t have you sneer at Christabel-it is a fine wild poem.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Things are always finding their level: which might be taken as the paraphrase or ironical definition of a storm &#8230; But persons are not things&#8211;but man does not find his level. Neither in body nor in soul does man find his level. After a hard and calamitous season, during which the thousand wheels of some vast manufactory had remained silent as a frozen waterfall, be it that plenty has returned and that trade has one more become brisk and stirring: go ask the overseer, and question the parish doctor, whether the workman&#8217;s health and temperance, with the staid and respectful manners best taught by the inward dignity of conscious self-support, have found their level again? Alas! I have more than once seen a group of children in Dorsetshire, during the heat of the dog-days, each with its little shoulders up to its ears and its chest pinched inward&#8211;the very habit and fixtures as it were that had been impressed on their frames by the former ill-fed, ill-clothed and unfuelled winters. But as with the body, or so worse with the mind. Nor is the effect confined to the labouring classes, whom by an ominous but too appropriate change in our phraseology we are now accustomed to call the labouring poor!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>^^ I love this so much. It is so true. &#8220;Persons are not things.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Michael Schmidt:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[Coleridge] believes in words, they have a compelling reality for him: he believes in naming more than in the objects named. He takes delight in thinking: it is a sensuous experience for him, and talk itself is one of his intenser pleasures.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>A.S. Byatt, <em>Unruly Times: Wordsworth and Coleridge in Their Time<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[Coleridge] was much more widely read than Wordsworth, much more interested in &#8216;placing&#8217; an idea in the history of ideas and in the context of general thought: he was able to give shape and articulation and complexity to the views Wordsworth was feeling for about what subjects poetry should treat, and in what manner. He was good for Wordsworth, too, in that their emotional needs were cvomplementary. Wordsworth, in his innermost self proud, solitary, courageous, and self-regarding, was on the surface suspicious and awkward. Coleridge, who lacked self-respect or self-confidence at the deepest level, was on the surface charming, warm, welcoming and quick to relax and involve people he met. Wordsworth increased Coleridge&#8217;s sense of his own value: Coleridge made it possible for Wordsworth to communicate, and thus more precisely to formulate, his solitary thoughts.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge on himself as a child: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Fretful and inordinately passionate; and as I could not play at anything and was slothful, I was despised and hated by the boys &#8230; Before I was eight years old, I was a <i>character<\/i>. Sensibility, imagination, vanity, sloth and feelings of deep and bitter contempt for almost all who traversed the orbit of my understading, were even then prominent and manifest.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Dorothy Wordsworth, letter to Mary Hutchinson (Wordsworth&#8217;s future wife):<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[Coleridge] lis a wonderful man. His conversation teems with soul, mind and spirit. Then he is so benevolent, so good tempered and cheerful, and, like William, interests himself so much about every little trifle. At first I thought him very plain, that is, for about three minutes: he is pale and thin, has a wide mouth, thick lips and not very good teeth, longish, loose-growing, half-curling rough black hair. But if you hear him speak for five minutes you think no more of them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0375725393?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=thesheivari-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0375725393\">Break, Blow, Burn: Camille Paglia Reads Forty-three of the World&#8217;s Best Poems<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=thesheivari-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0375725393\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" style=\"border:none !important; margin:0px !important;\" \/><\/i>, on &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221;:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The fifty-four line text of &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221; is therefore to be understood, according to the subtitle, as a &#8220;fragment&#8221;. Was Coleridge&#8217;s defense strategy aimed at shadowy carpers or at his own festering doubts? The poem certainly does not feel incomplete to us, whose looser standards of form descend from the radical innovations of Romanticism and nineteenth-century realism. We no longer expect perfection, symmetry, or sharp closure in works of art. Indeed, modernist plays and dance pieces can end so ambiguously that raised house-lights must signal the end of a performance. &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221; anticipates the fractures and fragmentation in Western culture that would be registered in collage, the jigsaw medium invented by Picasso on the eve of World War I and applied by T.S. Eliot to the shards of literature shifted from rubble in <i>The Waste Land<\/i> (1922).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Christopher Hitchens. &#8220;Stuck in Neutral&#8221;, Times Literary Supplement, March 15, 1996<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[John Stuart] Mill found his principal relief in poetry. Having made the sad discovery that he was not a machine and thus &#8220;the habit of analysis has a tendency to wear away the feelings: as indeed it has when no other mental habit is cultivated, and the analyzing spirit remains without its natural complements and correctives.&#8221; Mill turned to Coleridge and to Wordsworth and Byron and found that, while Byron&#8217;s condition was too much like his own, the Lyrical Ballads possessed powers of reflection and consolation. (Being Mill, he did not forget to add that they contained &#8220;two passages of grand imagery but bad philosophy.&#8221;)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge on William Hazlitt, letter to a friend, September 16, 1803:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>His manners are 99 in a 100 singularly repulsive.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Thomas De Quincey, one-time fan, and fellow opium addict:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The poor opium-martyr&#8230;His lips were baked with a feverish heat, and often black in colour &#8230; in spite of the water which he continued drinking.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Michael Schmidt:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>He first defines what Romanticism is and does: organic forms, intuitive formulation. From these follows the essential &#8220;suspension of disbelief&#8221;: we judge a poem first by asking what it sets out to do, then by appraising how well it does it, and only then do we ask whether it was worth doing.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Elizabeth Bishop, letter to Robert Lowell, December 2nd, 1956:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m glad it came along now because for several weeks I&#8217;ve been completely absorbed in Coleridge&#8217;s <em>Letters<\/em>&#8211;that new edition&#8230;And I read Coleridge, and read him, &#038; read him&#8211;just couldn&#8217;t stop&#8211;until he and the waterfall <em>roaring<\/em> under the windows, and ten times its usual size, were indistinguishable to my ears. By the time he&#8217;d had &#8220;flying irregular gout,&#8221; got himself drenched once more, was in debt, hating his wife, etc., I couldn&#8217;t believe that I really existed, or not what you&#8217;d call life, compared to that: dry, no symptoms of any sort, fairly solvent, on good terms with all my friends (as far as I know). I want very much to write some sort of piece, mostly about C., but bringing in Fitzgerald&#8217;s &#8220;The Crack-Up,&#8221; Dylan T., H .Crane, etc., but don&#8217;t know whether I know enough or have enough material at hand.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>From Coleridge&#8217;s notebooks:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>From my earliest recollection I have had a consciousness of Power without Strength&#8211;a perception, an experience, of more than ordinary power with an inward sense of weakness.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>A.S. Byatt, <em>Unruly Times: Wordsworth and Coleridge in Their Time<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>His primary interest as a critic was in the creative imagination of the poet which fused disparate objects into a new &#8220;organic&#8221; whole and was an image &#8220;in the finite mind&#8221; of the original FIAT OR &#8220;I AM&#8221; which had created the universe. His great poems&#8211;<em>The Ancient Mariner, Kubla Khan, Dejection<\/em>&#8211;all present images of worlds in which the vital unifying principle is not functioning or not perceived: the mariner is becalmed, stared at by Life-in-Death, alone on a wide wide sea&#8211;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>So lonely &#8217;twas that God himself<br \/>\nScarce seemed there to be.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em>Kubla Khan<\/em> is an image of a lost Paradise, that sunny dome, those caves of ice, that can only be rebuilt if the visionary poet can &#8220;revive within me&#8221; the &#8220;symphony and song&#8221; of harmony. In <em>Dejection<\/em> the poet can see, not feel, how beautiful are the natural objects, from which we &#8220;receive but what we give&#8221;. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[I have a] <em>feeble<\/em>, unmanly face. The exceeding <em>weakness<\/em>, strengthlessness, in my face, was ever painful to me.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Thomas Carlyle:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>His cardinal sin is that he wants <em>will<\/em>. He has no resolution.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>John Keats, letter to George and Tom Keats, December 1817:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Several things dovetailed in my mind, &#038; at once it struck me, what quality went to form a Man of Achievement especially in Literature &#038; which Shakespeare possessed so enormously\u2014-I mean <em>Negative Capability<\/em>, that is when man is capable of being in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact &#038; reason\u2014-Coleridge, for instance, would let go by a fine isolated verisimilitude caught from the Penetralium of mystery, from being incapable of remaining content with half knowledge. This pursued through Volumes would perhaps take us no further than this, that with a great poet the sense of Beauty overcomes every other consideration, or rather obliterates all consideration.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i>Sexual Personae<\/i>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Coleridge destroys Wordsworth&#8217;s Rousseauist world of feminine tenderness. <em>Christabel<\/em> is one of the most misread poems in literature. Critics have projected a Christian moralism upon it. Coleridge himself could not bear what he had written, and he tried to revise and reinterpret long afterward. <em>Christabel<\/em> is a splendid case study of the tension between imagination and morality. Through it, we follow a great poet into his excess of daemonic vision and then out again into the social realm of humane good wishes, where the visionary is beset by doubt, anxiety, and guilt. <em>Christabel<\/em> shows the birth of poetry in evil, hostility, and crime.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge on Wordsworth&#8217;s <em>The Recluse<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I think Wordsworth possessed more of the genius of a great philosophic poet than any man I ever knew, or, as I believe, has existed in England since Milton; but it seems to me that he ought never to have abandoned the contemplative position which is peculiarly &#8211; perhaps I might say exclusively &#8211; fitted for him. His proper title is <em>Spectator ab extra<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>William Hazlitt, on going to hear Coleridge speak in 1798:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A poet and a philosopher getting up into a Unitarian pulpit to preach the Gospel was a romance in these degenerate days, a sort of revival of the primitive spirit of Christianity, which was not to be resisted &#8230; When I got there, the organ was playing the 100th psalm, and, when it was done, Mr Coleridge rose and gave out his text. &#8216;And he went up into the mountain to pray HIMSELF, ALONE.&#8217; As he gave out his text, his voice &#8216;rose like a steam of rich distilled perfumes,&#8217; and when he came to the last two words, which he pronounced loud, deep, and distinct, it seemed to me, who was then young, as if the sounds had echoed from the bottom of the human heart, and as if that prayer might have floated in solemn silence through the universe. The preacher then launched into his subject, like an eagle dallying with the wind &#8230; There was to me a strange wilderness in his aspect, a dusky obscurity, and I thought him pitted with the smallpox. His forehead was broad and high, light as if built of ivory, with large projecting eyebrows, and his eyes rolling beneath them like a sea with darkened lustre &#8230; His mouth was gross, voluptuous, open, eloquent; his chin good-humoured and round; but his nose, the rudder of his face, the index of the will, was small, feeble, nothing &#8212; like what he has done.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Charles Lamb, describing hearing Coleridge recite &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221;, and also living near him:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I think his essentials not touched: he is very bad; but then he wonderfully picks up another day, and his face, when he repeats his verses, which said vision he repeats so enchantingly that it irradiates and brings heaven and elysian bowers into my parlour when he sings or says it, hath its ancient glory; an archangel a little damaged. &#8216;Tis enough to be within the whiff and wind of his genius for us not to possess our souls in quiet. If I lived with him, or the Author of the Excursion, I should, in a very little time, lose my own identity and be dragged along in the current of other people&#8217;s thoughts, hampered in a net.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;an archangel a little damaged&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Life were so flat a thing without Enthusiasm&#8211;that if for a moment it leave me, I have a sort of stomach-sensation attached to all my Thoughts, like those which succeed to the pleasurable operation of a dose of Opium. <i>Now<\/i> I make up my mind to a sort of heroism in believing the progressiveness of all nature, during the present melancholy state of Humanity&#8211;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <em>Break Blow Burn<\/em>, on &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221;:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Coleridge&#8217;s turbulent subterranean realm prefigures Freud&#8217;s irrational id, where dreams and art are born.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Thomas Carlyle, on hearing Coleridge speak: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I have heard Coleridge talk, with eager musical energy, two stricken hours, his face radiant and moist, and communicate no meaning whatever to any individual of his hearers, &#8212; certain of whom I for one, still kept eagerly listening in hope, the most had long before given up, and formed (if the room were large enough) secondary humming groups of their own. He began anywhere: you put some question to him, made some suggestive observation: instead of answering this, or decidedly setting out towards answer of it, he would accumulate formidable apparatus, logical swim-bladders, transcendental life-preservers and other precautionary and vehiculatory gear, for setting out; perhaps did at last get under way,&#8211; but was swiftly solicited, turned aside by the glance of some radiant new game on this hand or that, into new courses, and ever into new; and before long into all the Universe, where it was uncertain what game you would catch, or whether any.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Mary Evans, letter to STC:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There is an Eagerness in your Nature which is ever hurrying you into a sad extreme.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge, letter to his brother, 1794: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I laugh almost like an insane person when I cast my eye backward on the prospect of my past two years&#8211;What a gloomy <em>Huddle<\/em> of eccentric Actions, and dim-discovered motives! To real Happiness I bade adieu from the moment, I received my first Tutor&#8217;s Bill&#8211;since that time since that period my Mind has been irradiated by Bursts only of Sunshine&#8211;at all other times gloomy with clouds, or turbulent with tempests. Instead of manfully disclosing the disease, I concealed it with a shameful Cowardice of sensibility, till it cankered my very Heart&#8230;How many and how many hours have I stolen from the bitterness of Truth in those soul-enervating Reveries&#8211;in building magnificent Edifices of Happiness on some fleeting Shadow of Reality! My Affairs became more and more involved&#8211;I fled to Debauchery&#8211;fled from silent and solitary Anguish to all the uproar of senseless Mirth!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>George Orwell, &#8220;Pleasure Spots&#8221;, <i>Tribune<\/i>, January 11, 1946<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When one looks at Coleridge&#8217;s very different conception of a &#8220;pleasure dome&#8221;, one sees that it revolves partly round gardens and partly round caverns, rivers, forests and mountains with &#8220;deep romantic chasms&#8221;&#8211;in short, round what is called Nature. But the whole notion of admiring Nature, and feeling a sort of religious awe in the presence of glaciers, deserts or waterfalls, is bound up with the sense of man&#8217;s littleness and weakness against the power of the universe. The moon is beautiful partly because we cannot reach it, the sea is impressive because one can never be sure of crossing it safely. Even the pleasure one takes in a flower&#8211;and this is true even of a botanist who knows all there is to be known about the flower&#8211;is dependent partly on the sense of mystery. But meanwhile man&#8217;s power over Nature is steadily increasing.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge, letter to William Godwin, 1802:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In plain and natural English, I am a dreaming, and therefore an indolent man&#8211;I am a Starling self-incaged and always in the Moult, and my whole Note is, Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Charles Lamb, &#8220;The Two Races of Men&#8221;, London Magazine, 1820:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Reader, if haply thou art blessed with a moderate collection be shy of showing it; or if they heart overfloweth to lend them, lend thy books; but let it be to such a one as S.T.C.&#8211;he will return them (generally anticipating the time appointed) with usury; enriched with annotations, tripling their value. I have had experience. Many are these precious MSS. of his&#8211;(in <i>matter<\/i> oftentimes, and almost in <i>quantity<\/i> not infrequently, vying with the originals)&#8211;in no very clerkly hand&#8211;legible in my Daniel; in old Burton; in Sir Thomas Browne; and those abstruser cogitations of the Greville, now, alas! wandering in Pagan lands&#8211;I counsel thee, shut not thy heart, nor their library, against S.T.C.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge, annotation in Lamb&#8217;s copy of Beaumont and Fletcher folio:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>NB&#8211;I shall not be here long, Charles!&#8211;I gone, you will not mind my having spoiled a book in order to leave a Relic\/<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i>Sexual Personae<\/i>, on Coleridge vs. Wordsworth:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Coleridge is a wind-harp vibrating to someone else&#8217;s music. Wordsworth speaks for nature and crushes Coleridge by the enormity of his achievement&#8230;Wordsworth and Coleridge were locked in a sadomasochistic marriage of minds, where Wordsworth kept the hierarchical advantage and Coleridge surrendered himself to ritualistic self-abasement&#8230;Coleridge did his best work under Wordsworth&#8217;s influence. After they separated, Coleridge languished poetically and never matched his early achievements. The nature of their collaboration was this: Wordsworth was a father\/lover who absorbed Coleridge&#8217;s self-punishing superego and allowed his turbulent dream life to spill directly into his poetry. The supreme irony, as we shall see, is that everything that is great in Coleridge is a negation of Wordsworth. This is the son&#8217;s ultimate revenge upon the father. Wordsworth&#8217;s leading moral idea of nature&#8217;s benevolence is annihilated in Coleridge.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>From Anne Fadiman&#8217;s essay about reading a biography of Coleridge, included in her book <i>At Large and At Small<\/i>. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=71837\" target=\"blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Here is an excerpt.<\/a>: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I half-woke one morning recently with an obscure sense of dread, nagged by the feeling that someone close to me was in trouble. I knew that soon I would be sufficiently alert to remember who it was and to start making plans to help him, plans that I feared would be difficult and complex and likely to swallow up my day. I turned over in bed and saw volume 2 of Coleridge on my bedside table. It was open to page 240. When I had left him at midnight, Coleridge was lying in a sweat-soaked bed at the Grey Hound Inn in Bath, in December 1813, having argued with two housemates and fled into the night. He was nearly penniless; had missed the last stagecoach and walked five miles in a rainstorm, dragging a bag of books and old clothes; had a terrible cold; and was hallucinating from an opium overdose.<\/p>\n<p>I was relieved. The runaway was someone else\u2019s responsibility. Nevertheless, I was unable to settle down to work until I had read far enough ahead to assure myself that Coleridge would be properly taken care of. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>His nephew Henry Nelson Coleridge: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I would not take him as a guide through streets or fields or earthly roads. He had much of the geometrician about him; but he could not find his way.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i>Sexual Personae<\/i>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It is pagan Coleridge, not Protestant Wordsworth, who is the begetter of nineteenth-century archetypal vision.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>William Wordsworth on <em>The Rime of the Ancient Mariner<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[It has] great defects&#8230;first, that the principal person has no distinct character&#8230;secondly that he does not act, but is continually acted upon.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>William Hazlitt:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>His mind was clothed with wings.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Michael Schmidt:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Along with Doctor Johnson, Coleridge is the great critical intelligence among English poets, but a very different kind of intelligence from the Doctor&#8217;s. His interests extend beyond poetry to society, philosophy and religion, but poetry is the heart of wider concerns with language and the power of imagination and ideas. Unlike Johnson, he had no settled opinions; he was a man in search of truth, perplexed by personal, philosophical, political and aesthetic indecisions. We find consistency of principle, uncertainty of application.  His mature political thought is lucid, but he cannot &#8211; for example in <i>On the Constitution of Church and State<\/i> &#8211; bridge the gap between idea and implementation in practical, institutional forms. Yet Hazlitt is wrong: Coleridge does <i>not<\/i> indulge in casuistry to get out of an intellectual corner.<\/p>\n<p>Uncertainty has aesthetic consequences. Unlike other Romantic poets, he never establishes a personal mode. He writes Augustan verse of little distinction, discursive poems, then the handful of meditations and nature poems in which he is most himself, and finally three great poems that defy classification: &#8220;Christabel,&#8221; &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221; and &#8220;The Rime of the Ancient Mariner&#8221;. Of these poems, two are ostensibly unfinished.  Throughout his work there are fragments, including &#8220;The Destiny of Nations&#8221;. Other poems he worked on for years and remained dissatisfied. His &#8220;Dejection: An Ode&#8221; adopts a fragmentary form, juxtaposing verse paragraphs that are thematically but not logically sequential. Formal fragmentation reflects the theme: like a modernist, he breaks it to make it whole.  He did not complete his vast projected philosophical work. His attempt to schematize transcendental philosophy distorted the ideas imagination could apply but analysis unraveled.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Charles Lamb, &#8220;Witches, and Other Night Fears&#8221;, <em>London Magazine<\/em>, 1821<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The poverty of my dreams mortifies me. There is Coleridge, at his will can conjure up icy domes, and pleasure houses for Kubla Khan, and Abyssinian maids, and songs of Abara, and caverns,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Where Alph, the sacred river, runs,<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>to solace his night solitudes&#8211;where I cannot muster a fiddle.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Unlike a million of tigers, a million of men is very different from one man. Each man in a numerous society is not only co-existent with, but virtually organized into, the multitude of which he is an integral part &#8230;. This is strictly analogous to what takws place in the vital organization of the individual man.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>George Whalley on <em>The Rime of the Ancient Mariner<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Mariner&#8217;s passivity is Coleridge&#8217;s own.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge, 1914 letter to his editor Daniel Stuart: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I have too sad an account to settle between my Self that is and has been and my Self that <i>can<\/i> not cease to be, to allow me a single Complaint that for all my labors in behalf of Truth, against the Jacobins first, then against military Despotism abroad, against Weakness, and Despondency, and Faction, and factious <i>Goodness<\/i> at home&#8211;I have never received from those in power even a verbal acknowledgement&#8211;tho&#8217; by mere reference to dates it might be proved, that no small number of fine Speeches in the House of Commons and elsewhere originated directly or indirectly in my Essays and Conversation<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Jorge Luis Borges: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If you take a great critic, let&#8217;s say, Emerson or Coleridge, you feel that he has read a writer, and that his criticism comes from his personal experience of him, while in the case of Eliot you always think &#8211; at least I always feel &#8211; that he&#8217;s agreeing with some professor or slightly disagreeing with another&#8230;.After reading, to take a stock example, Coleridge on Shakespeare, especially on the character of Hamlet, a new Hamlet had been created for you&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Edward E. Bostetter:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[&#8220;The Rime of the Ancient Mariner&#8221;] is the morbidly self-obsessed account of a man who through his act has become the center of universal attention.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge on &#8220;Imagination&#8221;:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A mode of memory emancipated from the order of time and place, blended with and modified by that empirical phenomenon of the will, which we express by the word &#8216;choice.&#8217;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i>Sexual Personae<\/i>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Ancient Mariner&#8221; is one of the greatest poems in English, yet what it achieves is almost in defiance of language. Vision and execution often wildly diverge. Coleridge&#8217;s &#8220;conversational poems&#8221; are in better taste; but they are minor works in literary history, belonging to the age of sensibility, and would never have made the poet&#8217;s fame.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge on &#8220;Imagination&#8221;:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This power &#8230; reveals itself in the balance or reconcilement of opposite or discordant qualities: of sameness, with difference; of the general, with the concrete; the idea with the image; the individual with the representative; the sense of novelty and freshness with old and familiar objects, a more than usual state of emotion with more than usual order; judgment ever awake and steady self-possession with enthusiasm and feeling profound or vehement.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Michael Schmidt, <i>Lives of the Poets<\/i>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Rime of the Ancient Mariner&#8221; achieves what no other literary ballad of the period did: the tone of folk ballad. In an impersonal ballad singer&#8217;s voice, Coleridge explores in dramatic ways a theme developed in the discursive poems. The Mariner chooses one of three young men bound for a wedding feast. He tells his story: his ship, ice-bound near the pole, the albatross of good omen, his gratuitous act of slaying it, the punishment wrought on the whole crew; his individual penance and regeneration when in his heart he blessed the creatures about the becalmed ship. Released, he travels the world teaching reverence, love of God and his creatures. For six hundred and twenty-five lines Coleridge touches our deepest interests. The poem works on us like a dream: questions of belief or disbelief never arise: we attend.  Passages have entered common language; the images draw back to consciousness folk elements and hermetic symbolism. Wordsworth wrote privately to the publisher urging that the poem be dropped from future editions of <i>Lyrical Ballads<\/i> as being out of key with the other poems in the book.  He was uncomfortable with its dimensions and themes: Did he sense, too, how much more powerful, durable and <i>inevitable<\/i> it was than the other poems in the book?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge on Donne: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The vividness of the descriptions or declamations in Donne, or Dryden, is as much and as often derived from the forced fervour of the describer as from the reflections, forms or incidents which constitute their subject and materials. The wheels take fire from the mere rapidity of their motion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><big><strong>On Donne&#8217;s Poetry<\/strong><\/big><br \/>\n<strong>BY Samuel Taylor Coleridge<\/strong><br \/>\nWith Donne, whose muse on dromedary trots,<br \/>\nWreathe iron pokers into true-love knots;<br \/>\nRhyme&#8217;s sturdy cripple, fancy&#8217;s maze and clue,<br \/>\nWit&#8217;s forge and fire-blast, meaning&#8217;s press and screw. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Coleridge on John Dryden: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Dryden&#8217;s genius was of that sort which catches fire by its own motion; his chariot wheels <em>get<\/em> hot by driving fast.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i>Sexual Personae<\/i>, on &#8220;The Rime of the Ancient Mariner&#8221;:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I thought the albatross a superficial appendage, a kind of pin the tail on the donkey, and I found the stress on it by teachers and critics unconvincing and moralistic. Long afterward, I learned it was Wordsworth who suggested the idea of the albatross to Coleridge, which proves my point. This albatross is the biggest red herring in poetry. Its only significance is as a vehicle of transgression. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>William Hazlitt:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If Mr Coleridge had not been the most impressive talker of his age, he would probably have been the finest writer; but he lays down his pen to make sure of an auditor, and mortgages the admiration of posterity for the stare of an idler.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge on William Pitt&#8217;s &#8220;abstract&#8221; tendencies, 1814:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Citizens of the world &#8230; the demagogues of the &#8216;enlightened age&#8217;. [They] commenced by worshipping the sanctity of abstraction MAN, in the divinity of that other abstraction, the PEOPLE. But alas! the scheme <em>concludes<\/em> by mortising and compacting the scattered and sooty fragments of the <i>Populace<\/i> into one living and &#8216;multitudinous idol&#8217;, a blind but hundred-armed giant, of fearful power, to undermine the foundation of the social edifice, and finally perchance to pull down the all-sheltering roof on its own head, the victim of its own madness! Thus, in order to sacrifice the <em>natural<\/em> STATE to PERSONS, they must concorporate PERSONS into one <em>unnatural<\/em> state; the deluded subjects of which soon find themselves under a dominion tenfold more oppressive and vexatious than that to which the laws of GOD and NATURE had attached them &#8230; Shut up in the labyrinthine prison of forms and by-laws, of engagements by oaths and contributions by compulsion they move in slavish files beneath a jealous and ever-neighbouring control which despotizes in detail; in which, arming the hand and fixing the eye of all against each, merges the free will of the individual in the merciless tyranny of the confederation. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is eerily prophetic. This is the hellscape an idea can create. This is what abstraction leads to. Okay, CAN lead to, but MOST OFTEN leads to. If you think I&#8217;m wrong, read more books about police states and how it all got started. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Michael Schmidt on &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221;:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What the poem means is inseparable from the words and rhythms it uses. Paraphrase hardly gets a toehold. It is not until the second half of the poem that the &#8220;I&#8221; appears: &#8220;A damsel with a dulcimer \/ In a vision once I saw &#8230;&#8221; &#8230; The first half of the poem evokes the &#8220;stately pleasure dome&#8221;. In the second half the &#8220;I&#8221; wishes to retrieve it. Could he hear the music he once heard in a vision, he could re-create in air &#8220;That sunny dome! Those caves of ice!&#8221; He would be like Kubla Khan, himself sacred and exalted. The dulcimer recalls the harps we hear elsewhere in Coleridge&#8217;s work, instruments that harmonize the world of ideas and the world of the senses, and liberate imagination from the constraints of literal vision. In &#8220;Kubla Khan&#8221; the poetry achieves an intensity unprecedented in the discursive poems. The dulcimer&#8217;s sound would recreate not things perceived but imagined. Contemplation authenticates it; it can even transform and generate objects of contemplation, as in &#8220;Frost at Midnight&#8221;. &#8220;Could I revive within me&#8221;: it is a conditional clause. In fact he cannot. He cannot even &#8220;complete&#8221; the poem. If he could, he could complete <i>himself<\/i>, become one with &#8220;flashing eye&#8221; and &#8220;floating hair&#8221;. Yet from its partial disclosure we can infer the vision. The poem is about desire, not the failure of desire. In this thwarted hope resides its power.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i>Sexual Personae<\/i> on <em>The Rime of the Ancient Mariner<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Coleridge is overcome by anxiety and surrenders to Wordsworth and to Christianity. Love and prayer are a ludicrously inadequate response to the chthonian horror that Coleridge has summoned from the dark heart of existence. The roiling sea-snakes are the barbaric energy of matter, the undulating spiral of birth and death. What is the proper response to this ecstatic hallucination? Coleridge is hemmed in.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I have loved with enthusiastic self-oblivion those who have been well pleased that I should, year after year, flow with a hundred nameless rills into their main stream.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>William Hazlitt on the Lake Poets:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But the poets, the creatures of sympathy, could not stand the frowns both of king and people. They did not like to be shut out when places and pensions, when the critic&#8217;s praises, and the laurel-wreath were about to be distributed. They did not stomach being <em>sent to Coventry<\/em>, and Mr Coleridge sounded a retreat for them by the help of casuistry, and a musical voice.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>John Keats: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211;I walked with [Coleridge] at his alderman-after-dinner pace for near two Miles I suppose. In those two Miles he broached a thousand things&#8211; let me see if I can give you a list&#8211;Nightingales, Poetry&#8211;on Poetical sensation&#8211;Metaphysics&#8211;Different genres and species of Dreams&#8211;Nightmare&#8211;a dream accompanied by a sense of touch&#8211;single and double touch&#8211;A dream related&#8211;First and second consciousness&#8211;Monsters&#8211;the Kraken&#8211;Mermaids&#8211;southey believes in them&#8211;southeys belief too much diluted&#8211;A Ghost story&#8211;Good morning&#8211;I heard his voice as he came towards me&#8211;I heard it as he moved away&#8211;I had heard it all the interval&#8211;if it may be called so.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge on <em>The Ancient Mariner<\/em>: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The only or chief fault, if I might say so, was the obtrusion of the moral sentiment so openly on the reader.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong><big>from &#8220;English Bards and Scotch Reviewers&#8221;<\/big><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>By Lord Byron<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Shall gentle Coleridge pass unnotic\u2019d here,<br \/>\nTo turgid ode and tumid stanza dear?<br \/>\nThough themes of innocence amuse him best,<br \/>\nYet still obscurity\u2019s a welcome guest.<br \/>\nIf Inspiration should her aid refuse<br \/>\nTo him who takes a pixey for a muse,<br \/>\nYet none in lofty numbers can surpass<br \/>\nThe bard who soars to elegize an ass.<br \/>\nSo well the subject suits his noble mind,<br \/>\nHe brays the laureat of the long-ear\u2019d kind.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge, letter to a friend about his laudanum use:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The longer I abstained, the higher my spirits were, the keener my enjoyments&#8211;till the moment, the direful moment, arrived, when my pulse began to fluctuate, my Heart to palpitate, &#038; such a dreadful <em>falling-abroad<\/em>, as it were, of my whole frame, such intolerable Restlessness &#038; incipient Bewilderment, that in the last of my several attempts to abandon the dire poison, I exclaimed in agony, what I now repeat in seriousness &#038; solemnity&#8211;&#8220;I am too poor to hazard this! Had I but a few hundred Pounds, but 200\u00a3, half to send to Mrs. Coleridge, &#038; half to place myself in a private madhouse, where I could procure nothing but what a Physician thought proper, &#038; where a medical attendant could be constantly with me for two or three months (in less than that time Life or Death would be determined) then there might be Hope. Now there is none!&#8221; &#8211;O God! how willingly would I place myself under Dr. Fox in his Establishment&#8211;for my Case is a species of madness, only that it is a derangement, an utter impotence of the <em>Volition<\/em>, &#038; not of the intellectual Faculties&#8211;You bid me rouse myself&#8211;go, bid a man paralytic in both arms rub them briskly together, &#038; that will cure him. Alas! (he would reply) that I cannot move my arms is my Complaint &#038; my misery.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i>Sexual Personae<\/i>, on <em>Christabel<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Its two parts were written in 1797 and 1800. Coleridge withheld it from publication, but it circulated privately in manuscript. Its release in 1816 was at the urging of Byron, who loved it and called it the source of all of Sir Walter Scott&#8217;s verse tales. Coleridge never regarded <em>Christabel<\/em> as done and claimed plans for three more parts. His mind returned fretfully to the poem for years, and his inability to finish it was an abiding disappointment. For a century critics have advanced various theories to account for this. The corpus of commentary on <em>Christabel<\/em> is very small. Probably no poem in literary history has been so abused by moralistic Christian readings. Its blatant lesbian pornography has been ignored or blandly argued away&#8230;&#8221;Christabel&#8221; is a pornographic parable of western sex and power. It is the English Faust.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge, on late-stage John Milton: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>My mind is not capable of forming a more august conception than arises from the contemplation of this greatest man in his latter days: poor, sick, old, blind, slandered, persecuted: \u2018Darkness before and danger\u2019s voice behind,\u2019 in an age in which he was as little understood by the party for whom, as by that against whom, he had contended, and among men before whom he strode so far as to dwarf himself by the distance; yet still listening to the music of his own thoughts, or, if additionally cheered, yet cheered only by the prophetic faith of two or three solitary individuals, he did nevertheless<\/p>\n<p><em>\u2026 argue not<br \/>\nAgainst Heaven\u2019s hand or will, nor bate a jot<br \/>\nOf heart or hope; but still bore up and steer\u2019d<br \/>\nRight onward.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>William Hazlitt:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>He busied himself for a year or two with vibrations and vibratiuncles and the great law of association that binds all things in its mystic chain, and the doctrine of Necessity (the mild teacher of Charity) and the Millenium, anticipative of a life to come &#8211; and he plunged deep into the controversy of Matter and Spirit, and, as an escape from Dr Priestley&#8217;s Materialism, where he felt himself imprisoned by the logician&#8217;s spell, like Ariel in the cloven pine-tree, he became suddenly enamoured of Bishop Berkeley&#8217;s fairy-world, and used in all companies to build the universe, like a brave poetical fiction, of fine words &#8230; But poetry redeemed him from this spectral philosophy, and he bathed his heart in beauty. Alas! &#8216;Frailty, thy name is <em>Genius<\/em>!&#8217; &#8211;What is become of all this mighty heap of hope, of thought, of learning, and humanity? It has ended in swallowing doses of oblivion and in writing paragraphs in the <em>Courier<\/em>. &#8212; Such, and so little is the mind of man!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Touch a door a little ajar or half-open and it will yield to the push of your finger. Fire a cannon-ball at it and the door stirs not an inch; you make a hole through it, the door is spoilt forever, but not <i>moved<\/i>. Apply this moral to Education.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Camille Paglia, <i>Sexual Personae<\/i>, on <em>Christabel<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Coleridge, like Blake, senses the decadent perversity in Spenser. <em>Christabel<\/em>&#8216;s rape theme comes from the rape-infested <em>Faerie Queen<\/em>. But virginity has lost its Christian militancy. No armour defends Coleridge&#8217;s heroine against sexual predators. Christabel&#8217;s simple femininity is her undoing. Daemonic rapacity surges into her and obliterates her maidenhood. She is no match for hermaphrodite aggression.  There is no longer a working Christian scheme to divert lust into sublimation. The Spenserian bower where Christabel is lost is her own.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Charles Lamb, &#8220;Grace Before Meat&#8221;, London Magazine, 1821:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>C&#8211;holds that a man cannot have a pure mind who refuses apple-dumplings. I am not certain but he is right.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Kenneth Burke: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The theme of fascination in Coleridge&#8217;s &#8220;Mystery Poems&#8221; is that of an ambivalent power. He giveds us, as it were, a poetic thesaurus dictionary of terms ranging from thoroughly &#8220;good&#8221; fascination to thoroughly &#8220;bad&#8221; fascination.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge, <em>Biographia Literaria<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It has been observed before that images, however beautiful, though faithfully copied from nature, and as accurately represented in words, do not of themselves characterise the poet. They become proof of original genius only as far as they are modified by a predominant passion; or when they have the effect of reducing multitude to unity, or succession to an instant; or lastly, when a human and intellectual life is transferred to them from the poet&#8217;s own spirit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Derek Mahon: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[Seamus] Heaney is a Wordsworth man and I\u2019m a Coleridge man. I love the poetry, and the trajectory of his life has always fascinated me. His Biographia is a complete mess, but is still full of the most wonderful stuff.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>A.S. Byatt on Ford Madox Ford and Coleridge: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In fact Ford\u2019s literary \u201ccharacter\u201d is not unlike that of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, also his own worst enemy. Both were men with a passion for exact thought and exact use of words who nevertheless had justified reputations as appalling liars. Both wrote major works o art, and a considerable body of writing by any standard (Ford wrote eighty-one books). Yet both were felt not to have fulfilled their promise: to have wasted their talents. Both boasted, and both devoted themselves, with tact, humility and, most important, appropriate and adequate intelligence, to the furthering of the work, and the understanding of the work of writers they felt were greater than themselves. Both were grandiose and incompetent, journalistic entrepreneurs, whose periodicals are nevertheless literary landmarks. Both rewrote, to our benefit, literary history. Both were not insular \u2013 Ford knew French, German, Italian, Provencal literature, and <em>used<\/em> it, as Coleridge knew German, French and Italian. Perhaps this last is another reason why Ford found his best reception, and his sharpest critics, among the Americans. He wrote about, and claimed that he was, the English gentleman: he was in fact a polyglot, half-German, brought up amongst the aesthetes and Bohemians who frequented the house of his grandfather, the Pre-Raphaelite artist Ford Madox Brown.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Coleridge on James Thomson: <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The love of nature seems to have led Thomson to a cheerful religion; and a gloomy religion to have led Cowper to a love of nature. The one would carry his fellowmen along with him into nature; the other flies to nature from his fellow-men. In chastity of diction, however, and the harmony of blank verse, Cowper leaves Thomson immeasurably below him; yet still I feel the latter to have been a born poet.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Michael Schmidt:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Wordsworth, with Coleridge now beside, and now beyond him &#8211; extended the language and thematic range of Rnglish poetry into the new century. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>From Coleridge&#8217;s notebooks:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230;a most frightful Dream of a Woman whose features were blended with darkness catching hold of my right eye &#038; attempting to pull it out&#8211;I caught hold of her arm fast&#8211;a horrid feel&#8211;Wordsworth cried out aloud to me hearing my scream&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>I was followed up &#038; down by a frightful pale woman who, I thought, wanted to kiss me &#038; had the property of giving me a shameful Disease by breathing in the face.<\/p>\n<p>&#038; again I dreamt that a fighre of a woman of a gigantic Height, dim &#038; indefinite &#038; smokelike appeared&#8211;&#038; that I was forced to run up towards it&#8211;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><big><strong>Thoughts about the Person from Porlock<\/strong><\/big><br \/>\n<strong>By Stevie Smith<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Coleridge received the Person from Porlock<br \/>\nAnd ever after called him a curse,<br \/>\nThen why did he hurry to let him in?<br \/>\nHe could have hid in the house.<\/p>\n<p>It was not right of Coleridge in fact it was wrong<br \/>\n(But often we all do wrong)<br \/>\nAs the truth is I think he was already stuck<br \/>\nWith Kubla Khan.<\/p>\n<p>He was weeping and wailing: I am finished, finished,<br \/>\nI shall never write another word of it,<br \/>\nWhen along comes the Person from Porlock<br \/>\nAnd takes the blame for it.<\/p>\n<p>It was not right, it was wrong,<br \/>\nBut often we all do wrong.<\/p>\n<p>*<\/p>\n<p>May we inquire the name of the Person from Porlock?<br \/>\nWhy, Porson, didn&#8217;\u0099t you know?<br \/>\nHe lived at the bottom of Porlock Hill<br \/>\nSo had a long way to go,<\/p>\n<p>He wasn&#8217;t much in the social sense<br \/>\nThough his grandmother was a Warlock,<br \/>\nOne of the Rutlandshire ones I fancy<br \/>\nAnd nothing to do with Porlock,<\/p>\n<p>And he lived at the bottom of the hill as I said<br \/>\nAnd had a cat named Flo,<br \/>\nAnd had a cat named Flo.<\/p>\n<p>I long for the Person from Porlock<br \/>\nTo bring my thoughts to an end,<br \/>\nI am becoming impatient to see him<br \/>\nI think of him as a friend,<\/p>\n<p>Often I look out of the window<br \/>\nOften I run to the gate<br \/>\nI think, He will come this evening,<br \/>\nI think it is rather late.<\/p>\n<p>I am hungry to be interrupted<br \/>\nFor ever and ever amen<br \/>\nO Person from Porlock come quickly<br \/>\nAnd bring my thoughts to an end.<\/p>\n<p>*<\/p>\n<p>I felicitate the people who have a Person from Porlock<br \/>\nTo break up everything and throw it away<br \/>\nBecause then there will be nothing to keep them<br \/>\nAnd they need not stay.<\/p>\n<p>*<\/p>\n<p>Why do they grumble so much?<br \/>\nHe comes like a benison<br \/>\nThey should be glad he has not forgotten them<br \/>\nThey might have had to go on.<\/p>\n<p>*<\/p>\n<p>These thoughts are depressing I know. They are depressing,<br \/>\nI wish I was more cheerful, it is more pleasant,<br \/>\nAlso it is a duty, we should smile as well as submitting<br \/>\nTo the purpose of One Above who is experimenting<br \/>\nWith various mixtures of human character which goes best,<br \/>\nAll is interesting for him it is exciting, but not for us.<br \/>\nThere I go again. Smile, smile, and get some work to do<br \/>\nThen you will be practically unconscious without positively having to go.<\/p>\n<p><strong>William Hazlitt on Coleridge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>All that he has done of moment, he had done twenty years ago: since then he may be said to have lived on the sound of his own voice.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Samuel Taylor Coleridge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Poetry, even that of the loftiest, and seemingly, that of the wildest odes, has a logic of its own as severe as that of science; and more difficult, because more subtle, more complex, and dependent on more and more fugitive causes. In the truly great poets, there is a reason assignable, not only for every word, but for the position of every word.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<br \/>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\n<small><em>Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here&#8217;s a link to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.venmo.com\/u\/Sheila-OMalley-3\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">my Venmo account<\/a>. And I&#8217;ve launched a Substack, <a href=\"https:\/\/sheilaomalley.substack.com\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sheila Variations 2.0<\/a>, if you&#8217;d like to subscribe.<\/em> <\/small><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/sheilaomalley.substack.com\/embed\" width=\"480\" height=\"320\" style=\"border:1px solid #EEE; background:white;\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>He looked at his own Soul with a telescope. What seemed all irregular, he saw and shewed to be beautiful Constellations: and he added to the Consciousness hidden worlds within worlds. &#8211;Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Notebooks It&#8217;s his birthday today. I&#8217;ll &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=59591\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[15,39,9],"tags":[81,1757,257,1566,2758,2617,2616,162,2208,1587,1640,1641,208,225,239,205,1544,160,163,1642,2729,172,232,1535,2590],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59591"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=59591"}],"version-history":[{"count":69,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59591\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":151972,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59591\/revisions\/151972"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=59591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=59591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=59591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}