{"id":6545,"date":"2007-05-27T10:57:45","date_gmt":"2007-05-27T14:57:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=6545"},"modified":"2015-04-06T10:11:47","modified_gmt":"2015-04-06T14:11:47","slug":"the-books-sugar-and-other-stories-racine-and-the-tablecloth-a-s-byatt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=6545","title":{"rendered":"The Books: \u201cSugar and Other Stories\u201d \u2013 \u2018Racine and the Tablecloth\u2019 (A.S. Byatt)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Book Excerpt: Adult fiction:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"bosugar.jpeg\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/bosugar.jpeg\" width=\"128\" height=\"201\" align=\"left\" hspace=\"6\" \/><i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0679742271\/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0679742271&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=thesheivari-20&#038;linkId=XATUWSZVH5NYGHDP\">Sugar and Other Stories<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/e\/ir?t=thesheivari-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0679742271\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" style=\"border:none !important; margin:0px !important;\" \/><\/i> &#8211; by A.S. Byatt.  A short story collection &#8211; her first.  She has a ton more out and I&#8217;ll be excerpting from them quite a bit.  She&#8217;s fantastic.  As anyone who reads Byatt knows, she&#8217;s very into fairy tales (remember Christabel&#8217;s story &#8216;The Glass Coffin&#8217; &#8211; in <i>Possession<\/i>)?  Byatt cites as some of her main influences &#8211; not just giants like George Eliot &#8211; but also the Brothers Grimm and Arabian Nights (the copy of Arabian Nights I&#8217;m reading now has a preface by AS Byatt).  The influence is clear, in all of her writing.  The stories in this particular collection are not fairy tales, not exactly &#8211; but there&#8217;s something in the writing &#8211; a distance, a perspective &#8211; that makes them not quite real.  They become fables.  The narrator is not omniscent &#8211; the narrator has a point of view, it&#8217;s more like a story being told round a fire.  I love that aspect of Byatt&#8217;s short stories.  They&#8217;re thrilling to read.<\/p>\n<p>The first story in this collection is a haunting tale called &#8216;Racine and the Tablecloth&#8217;.  It reminds me a bit of Margaret Atwood&#8217;s <i>Cat&#8217;s Eye<\/i> &#8230; the terror and potency of being a young girl, surrounded by other young girls.  The danger &#8230; the danger especially of pulling ahead of the pack.  In a way, this is a feminist fable.  Emily &#8211; the lead of the story &#8211; is a brilliant student, she is a scholarship student at a boarding school &#8211; and she is clearly better, academically, than everyone else.  This does not make her any friends.  She is isolated.  And worse than that &#8211; the headmistress of the school, named Miss Crighton-Walker, seems to hone in on Emily &#8211; in a way that can only be described as malevolent.  She is an adult &#8230; yet she finds something antagonistic about this young girl, who is only 14 years old.  And although Miss Crighton-Walker would never admit it, she sets out to destroy Emily&#8217;s spirit.<\/p>\n<p>Great story.  Chilling.  And with a narrative voice that is very interesting &#8211; continuiing to assert itself into the story.  Who is the narrator?  Not Emily.  No.  It&#8217;s a story-teller, who ruminates over the meaning of things, who pulls us out of the driving action &#8211; to contemplate motivations, themes.  It&#8217;s a great device because it elevates the story.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\n<b>Excerpt from <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0679742271\/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0679742271&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=thesheivari-20&#038;linkId=XATUWSZVH5NYGHDP\">Sugar and Other Stories<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/e\/ir?t=thesheivari-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0679742271\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" style=\"border:none !important; margin:0px !important;\" \/><\/i> &#8211; by A.S. Byatt. <\/b> &#8211; &#8216;Racine and the Tablecloth&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>I am not going to describe the dance, which was sad for almost all of them, must have been, as they stood in their resolutely unmingled ranks on either side of the grey school hall.  Nothing of interest really happened to Emily on that occasion, as she must, in her secret mind, have known it would not.  It faded rapidly enough in her memory, whereas Miss Crichton-Walker&#8217;s peculiar anxiety about it, even down to her curious analogy between razors and lawn-mowers, remained stamped there, clear and pungent, an odd and significant trace of the days of her education.  In due course this memory accrued to itself Emily&#8217;s later reflections on the punning names of depilatories, all of which aroused in her mind a trace-image of Miss Crichton-Walker&#8217;s swinging, white, hairless body in th emoonlight.  Veet.  Immac.  Nair.  Emily at the time of the static dance was beginning to sample the pleasures of being a linguist.  Nair sounded like a Miltonic coinage for Satanic scaliness.  Veet was a thick English version of French rapidity and discreet efficiency.  Immac, in the connexion of Miss Crichton-Walker, was particularly satisfying, carrying with it the Latin, maculata, stained or spotted, immaculata, unstained, unspotted, and the Immaculate Conception, which, Emily was taught at this time, referred to the stainless or spotless begetting of the Virgin herself, not to the subsequent self-contained, unpunctured, manless begetting of the Son.  The girls in the dormitories were roused by Miss Crichton-Walker to swap anecdotes about Veet, which according to them had &#8216;the &#8211; most &#8211; terrible &#8211; <i>smell<\/i>&#8216; and produced a stinking slop of hairy grease.  No one sent her razor home.  It was generally agreed that Miss Crichton-Walker had too little bodily hair to know what it was to worry about it.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, and at the same time, there was Racine.  You may be amused that Miss Crichton-Walker should simultaneously ban ladies&#8217; razors and promote the study of <i>Ph\u00ef\u00bf\u00bddre<\/i>.  It is amusing.  It is amusing that the same girls should already have been exposed to the betrayed and betraying cries of Ophelia&#8217;s madness.  &#8216;Then up he rose, and doffed his clothes, and dupped the chamber door.  Let in the maid that out a maid, never departed more.&#8217;  It is the word &#8216;dupped&#8217; that is so upsetting in that little song, perhaps because it recalls another Shakespearean word that rhymes with it, Iago&#8217;s black ram tupping the white ewe, Desdemona.  Get thee to a nunnery, said Hamlet, and there was Emily, in a nunnery, never out of one, in a rustle of terrible words and delicate and gross suggestions, the stuff of her studies.  But that is not what I wanted to say about Racine.  Shakespeare came upon Emily gradually, she could accommodate him, he had always been there.  Racine was sudden and new.  That is not it, either, not what I wanted to say.<\/p>\n<p>Think of it.  Twenty girls or so &#8211; were there so many? &#8211; in the A level French class, and in front of each a similar, if not identical, small, slim greenish book, more or less used, more or less stained.  When they riffled through the pages, the text did not look attractive.  It proceeded in strict, soldierly columns of rhymed couplets, a form disliked by both the poetry-lovers and the indifferent amongst them.  Nothings eemed to be happening, it all seemed to be the same.  The speeches were very long.  There appeared to be no interchange, no battle of dialogue.  No action.  <i> Ph\u00ef\u00bf\u00bddre<\/i>.  The French teacher told them that the play was based on the <i>Hippolytus<\/i> of Euripides, and that Racine had altered the plot by adding a character, a young girl, Aricie, whom Hippolytus should fall in love with.  She neglected to describe the original play, which they did not know.  They wrote down, Hippolytus, Euripides, Aricie.  She told them that the play kept the unities of classical drama, and told them what these unities were, and they wrote them down.  The Unity of Time = One Day.  The Unity of Space = One Place.  The Unity of Action = One Plot.  She neglected to say what kind of effect these constrictions might have on an imagined world: she offered a half-hearted rationale she clearly despised a little herself, as though the Greeks and the French were children who made unnecessary rules for themselves, did not see wider horizons.  The girls were embarrassed by having to read this passionate sing-song verse aloud in French.  Emily shared their initial reluctance, their near-apathy.  She was later to believe that only she became a secret addict of Racine&#8217;s convoluted world, tortuously lucid, savage and controlled.  As I said, the imagination of the other girls&#8217; thoughts was not Emily&#8217;s strength.  In Racine&#8217;s world, all the inmates were gripped wholly by incompatible passions which swelled uncontrollably to fill their whole universe, brimming over and drowning its hoizons.  They were all creatures of excess, their secret blood burned and boiled and an unimaginably hot bright sun glared down in judgment. They were all horribly and beautifully interwoven, tearing each other apart in a perfectly choreographed dance, every move inevitable, lovely, destroying.  In this world men and women had high and terrible fates which were themselves and yet greater than themselves.  Ph\u00ef\u00bf\u00bddre&#8217;s love for Hippolyte was wholly unnatural, dragging her world askew, wholly inevitable, a force like a flood, or a conflagration, or an eruption.  This art described a world of monstrous disorder and excess and at the same time ordered it with iron control and constrictions, the closed world of the classical stage and the prescribed dialogue, the flexible, shining, inescapable steel mesh of that regular, regulated singing verse.  It was a world in which the artist was in unusual collusion with the Reader, his art like a mapping trellis between the voyeur and the terrible writhing of the characters.  It was an austere and adult art, Emily thought, who knew little about adults, only that they were unlike Miss Crichton-Walker, and had anxieties other than those of her tired and over-stretched mother.  The Reader was adult.  The Reader saw with the pitiless clarity of Racine &#8211; and also with Racine&#8217;s impersonal sympathy &#8211; just how far human beings could go, what they were capable of.<\/p>\n<p><iframe style=\"width:120px;height:240px;\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" src=\"\/\/ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/widgets\/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&#038;OneJS=1&#038;Operation=GetAdHtml&#038;MarketPlace=US&#038;source=ac&#038;ref=tf_til&#038;ad_type=product_link&#038;tracking_id=thesheivari-20&#038;marketplace=amazon&#038;region=US&#038;placement=0679742271&#038;asins=0679742271&#038;linkId=S65V2RHKDFLHWXNY&#038;show_border=true&#038;link_opens_in_new_window=true\"><br \/>\n<\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Book Excerpt: Adult fiction: Sugar and Other Stories &#8211; by A.S. Byatt. A short story collection &#8211; her first. She has a ton more out and I&#8217;ll be excerpting from them quite a bit. She&#8217;s fantastic. As anyone who &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/?p=6545\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[15],"tags":[81,75,1029],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6545"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6545"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6545\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":98160,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6545\/revisions\/98160"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}