![\"HouseOfLeaves.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.sheilaomalley.com\/HouseOfLeaves.jpg\")
House of Leaves<\/a>![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=thesheivari-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0375703764\")
<\/i> – by Mark Z. Danielewski<\/p>\nUhm, pardon my French, but this book is a total mind f***!!!!! Has anyone else read it? I LOVED it … if by “loved” I mean: “horrified and riveted”. This is one of the few books that has given me actual nightmares. Spatial disorientation nightmares, which is what the book is all about. The phenomenal thing about this book is that there is a “gimmick” to it, and normally I hate books with gimmicks (or, I hate books that are JUST the ‘gimmick’). But this book is far more than its gimmick. It is a fantastic story, one I could not put down, one that I lived in my dark imagination after I put the stupid thing down, AND it has some startlingly<\/i> good writing. It is quite an accomplishment. I would love to hear from other people who read this book.<\/p>\n
The book is about a couple who uproot themselves from their big city life, buy a house in the suburbs somewhere, move in, and over time, realize that there is something … off<\/i> about the house. Doors open on hallways which should not be there, hallways that would go off into the backyard if they were real. Meaning: the INSIDE of the house is larger than the outside frame. This becomes more and more apparent as the book goes on, and basically, they discover ETERNITY is inside their house. They could explore it for thousands of years and never get to the bottom of it.<\/p>\n
I say the book is ABOUT this couple, but that’s not quite true. The real lead character is a guy named Johnny Truant who works in a tattoo parlor. He has stripper girlfriends, and a rough past. And – he comes across a manuscript written by a blind man who is now dead, named Zampano. Zampano’s manuscript is a scholarly treatise about the “Navidson” house, and the manuscript is found in bits and pieces, with whole sections missing, footnotes unexplained, and Johnny Truant becomes obsessed with the story. It starts to take over his mind. He begins to research the manuscript itself, and he adds his own footnotes to explain other footnotes. Slowly, as you read the manuscript, the footnotes begin to take over the page. Johnny Truant interjects himself, and then, we don’t know when, it is apparent that yet another person has taken over the manuscript, and they, too, add corrective notes to Truant’s footnotes: “Mr. Truant here appears to be dissembling …” It makes you wonder: what happened to Truant? Did he go mad trying to put together the manuscript?<\/p>\n
The “gimmick” of the book is that it gives you the feeling that you are looking through a pile of unorganized papers. Some of the pieces of the manuscript were written on scraps of paper, pasted over other pieces of paper. The book’s design manages to suggest that. There are a couple sections where the print appears backwards and you have to hold it up to a mirror to read it. There are some parts written in code, you have to figure it out and break the code. The shape of the words on the page end up being a visual representation of the disorientation the Navidsons feel as they explore their own home. Some pages have one word on it. Some have 3 or 4 but they’re scattered all over the place. All of this could be SO annoying if it weren’t so good: The gimmick fits the book. Mark Danielewski is obviously enormously clever (if you’re gonna read the book, have your Thesaurus nearby!), and to have thought up such a thing, and then to execute it … I tip my hat.<\/p>\n
What I love about the book, though, is the voice of Johnny Truant, working out his demons in the footnotes of this other manuscript. Talking TO the manuscript, wrestling with his fear, his past, and trying to make something better of himself. Revealing too much, hiding even more … it’s a terrific narrative voice. <\/p>\n
I sincerely recommend this book to horror genre fans. It’s terrifying. I’m making it sound very intellectual
\n(and in many ways it is) but the vision of the nothingness inside that house, the gaping maw, the abyss revealed behind doors … is one I will never forget.<\/p>\n
Here’s a bit of Johnny Truant’s introduction. He talks about how he came across the manuscript, and he hints at how it has taken over his life. I had a hard time figuring out not just WHAT to excerpt it, but how. The book has a very specific look<\/i>: every page has 5 footnotes, each one in a different typeface. The Zambano manuscript is graphically represented, so it feels like you’re reading Post-It notes, scraps of paper, and fragments. <\/p>\n
I always try to pick an excerpt that gives the feeling of the book itself, but that wasn’t really possible with this one. It has to be taken as a whole.<\/p>\n