“To match the shoes with the jacket is fey. To match the shoes with the hat is taste.” – Gene Wilder on the Willy Wonka costume sketches

gene-wilder-435

In Gene Wilder’s book Kiss Me Like a Stranger, he describes his first meeting with the director Mel Stuart, before he had decided to do it. He had reservations. He had an idea for what would dispel those reservations. Listen, and learn. This is how specific he was. This is how much IN the dream-space he was of the character, before he had even agreed to do it. This is how smart he was about script and character analysis. Those who think actors just do what the director tells them … well, they can’t have ever been involved in a creative process, ever. But this? Gene Wilder here?

This is a unique level of engagement with a script, make no mistake.

Although I liked Roald Dahl’s book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, I wasn’t sure if I wanted to play Willy Wonka. The script was good, but there was something that was bothering me. Mel Stuart, the man who was going to direct the movie, came to my home to talk about it.

“What’s bothering you?”

“When I make my first entrance, I’d like to come out of the door carrying a cane and then walk towards the crowd with a limp. After the crowd sees that Willy Wonka is a cripple, they all whisper to themselves and then become deathly quiet. As I walk towards them, my cane sinks into one of the cobblestones I’m walking on and stands straight up, by itself … but I keep on walking, until I realize that I no longer have my cane. I start to fall forward, and just before I hit the ground, I do a beautiful forward somersault and bounce back up, to great applause.”

” … Why do you want to do that?”

“Because from that time on, no one will know if I’m lying or telling the truth.”

Mel Stuart looked a little puzzled. I knew he wanted to please me, but he wasn’t quite sure about this change.

“You mean – if you can’t do what you just said, you won’t do the part?”

“That’s right,” I answered.

Mel mumbled to himself, ” … comes out of the door, has a cane, cane gets stuck in a cobblestone, falls forward, does a somersault, and bounces back up …” He shrugged his shoulders. “Okay!”

Imagine Willy Wonka without that trip. Imagine Willy Wonka without that disturbing first entrance. Impossible. Best of all: Mel Stuart filmed it exactly as Gene Wilder told him to. Shot for shot.

This is Wilder’s daunting level of understanding what was RIGHT.

This included, later, his thoughts on Willy Wonka’s costume. Mel Stuart sent Wilder some sketches. Wilder looked them over, and wrote Stuart a note back with his thoughts.

Don’t miss this letter. “The hat is terrific, but making it 2 inches shorter would make it more special.”

Posted in Actors, RIP | Tagged | 2 Comments

The Mystery That Was Gene Wilder’s Gift

giphy

Is it the eye pan to the right? Is it the delayed eyebrow raise? Is it what he’s doing with his mouth? Is it that it’s one of his specialties – the comedic pause? Is it all of that together?

Trying to describe in words why this is so funny is like trying to describe why a complicated calculus equation comes out the way it does in all its chilly complex perfection.

Posted in Actors, RIP | Tagged | Leave a comment

Rust and Bone: One of the Best Films of 2012.

2lavgb7

Not a review. I repeat: Not a review. I’ve been writing this, a paragraph at a time, for over 2 months. It’s more like one of my SPN re-caps, where I go scene by scene exploring story and character analysis. It occurred to me as I did this that this was how I used to work when I worked as an actress. Dreaming into every moment, from every possible side, considering backstory and motivations, paying attention what is NOT said just as much as what IS said. I love to riff like this and nobody would ever pay me to write a piece of this length, but I’ve been wanting to write about Rust and Bone – in this way – since it first came out, because I am obsessed. In other words, yes. I know this is long. And I know that “long”, in this case, is an understatement.

Ali (Matthias Schoenaerts) and Stephanie (Marion Cotillard), the two lead characters in Jacques Audiard’s Rust and Bone, both do one thing in their lives really well, better than most, and in every other area, they do almost nothing well. They’re both highly compartmentalized people. Ali has one overriding goal and passion, and he devotes himself to it, but otherwise he can’t think even two steps down the road. His life may be more openly a mess than hers, but what we see of her life before everything happens is pretty bleak as well. Stephanie is already doing what she wants to do in life, and she does it really well, but outside of that one arena of expertise, her life is chaos.

Rust and Bone was one of the best films of 2012. Roger Ebert wrote in his review that he would add it to his Great Movies list, but never got around to it, due to his illness at the time. Audiard said that as he approached this material, telling two separate stories for almost half of the film, he realized that neither character was the protagonist: “The protagonist of the story is the love story. The love story is the hero.” He is so successful at bringing that across that Rust and Bone has one of the most meaningful – if not the most meaningful (off the top of my head I can’t think of another one) – “I love you”s in any movie I have ever seen. When I saw it in the theatre, and heard those words, I actually burst into tears. What the hell. This is not my style. Hats off.

Rust and Bone is one of the most purely emotional love stories of the last 20 years. Longer. Ever. If you described the plot (as I am about to do, at LENGTH), it might sound like some Nicholas Sparks shit. But Rust and Bone, is raw, and – and this is the key – even though it’s a love story it acknowledges that some damage is never undone. Love does not cure all. Love is an amazing miracle in Rust and Bone – a life-saver – but it does not cure all. The sex scenes in Rust and Bone surge with palpable emotion (not just lust: all KINDS of feelings churn around as is true with sex in real-life, but so often not shown onscreen). The act of sex can CREATE love. And nobody is more surprised by that than the two characters participating in said sex.

rb13

Rust and Bone is a contemporary story told in the old-fashioned style of melodrama. Melodrama is so out of style that critics and audiences sometimes don’t know what to do with it, and call it “sentimental” or “weepy” or – without even realizing that they are being accurate as opposed to critical – “melodramatic”. This happened when Rust and Bone premiered at Cannes. The opinion was split. Many loved it. But many others thought it was too “obvious”, etc.. I spoke recently about what classic melodrama could actually do, better than other genres, in my review of Ira Sachs’ beautiful Little Men:

Melodrama for some reason has a bad reputation, seeming to suggest soap operas or three-hanky weepers, but melodrama has always been one of the most effective genres for social and economic criticism because down on the ground things really are that important. There is nothing melodramatic about losing one’s home and livelihood. It’s life and death to the people involved.

The obviously presented (Audiard does not try to be subtle) mirroring and repeating thematic symbols in Rust and Bone – physical trauma, sunlight, panes of glass, and water – work in the way symbols do in good literary fiction. In Rust and Bone you can’t get away from them, they’re in every visual. The story is about going from darkness into light. From the womb into self-hood. From cold into warmth. Or from warmth into cold. Plunging to the surface from underwater, or plunging underwater from the surface. Water when frozen turns to ice. The first scene between the two characters involves ice, and one of the final scenes also involves ice. One of the first things he says to her is, “Breathe.” Come to the surface, come up for air.

In melodrama, human emotion is the most important thing.

I want to talk about the film but I should say before moving forward, since much of the movie depends on not knowing much going in (at least that was the case with me. It’s hard, but I try to avoid pre-release publicity):

All the Spoilers Following

Continue reading

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | 63 Comments

R.I.P. Gene Wilder

tumblr_nvursllIkn1r6j0a7o1_500

I said what I needed to say on Twitter.

Humphrey Bogart said that good acting was “6 feet back” in the eyes. Gene Wilder exemplified that.

For example this:

Actors watch a moment like that and have the same reaction to it that a young violinist has to seeing Ihtzak Perlman play Carnegie Hall. You are in the same field as that genius, in name only. You’re not even in the same hemisphere with these people when it comes to talent. A moment like that one turns the actors I know into Salieris. That’s the breaks. Just be grateful that there are such artists who come down among us for a short while and grace us with their presence, their generosity, their gifts.

Posted in Actors, RIP | Tagged | 14 Comments

2012’s Rust and Bone: Four Motifs (With Overlap)

I’ve been working on a lengthy post about this great film, Rust and Bone, directed by Jacques Audiard. Figured this – a glimpse at the interconnected visual motifs in the film – would be a good teaser.

One motif belongs only to her (Stephanie, played by Marion Cotillard). One motif belongs only to him (Ali, played by Matthias Schoenaerts). One, they share. And one is the overall look of the movie. Together, these motifs create a visual style disorienting, palpably emotional – not romantic/sweet/intense emotions but RAW, pain so raw it can’t be faced directly, joy so raw it hurts. The look is beautiful but it’s not necessarily comforting. There is an intensity that is difficult to bear, or deal with directly, like looking at the sun. Audiard does not give the film a realistic look, because what the film REALLY is is a melodrama. Melodrama trucks in emotions. The story’s emotional themes are there in the visuals: Truth trying to break through. Other emotional experiential layers trying to be reached, or at least glimpsed, or even perceived at all. Coldness seeking out warmth, darkness seeking out light.

Rust and Bone was one of the best films of 2012. More to come.

In the meantime: Visual Motifs in Rust and Bone:

1. Lens Flares. Filming directly into the sun

rb16

rb84

rb53

rb39

rb54

r40

rb12

r06

r51

rb81

rb13

r7

2. Her motif: Leaning into the sun

rb15

rb55

r17

3. Their motif: The backs of their heads

r3

rb14

r12

rb71

r10

r20

r21

rb10

r54

r23

r29

r33

r44

r55

r58

r59

r71

r73

4. His motif: Looking through a window

r4

rb52

r6

r8

r31

r32

r18

r48

r62

r66

r70

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Supporting Actress Smackdown of 1984

Cq4lJgLWEAAgjo_

I have been following Nathaniel Rogers’ wonderful Oscar smackdown series for YEARS. He was one of the first film bloggers I discovered, back in the dark ages of time, so it’s super fun that I finally get to participate in this series I’ve been following since the beginning. Rogers picks a year, picks an Oscar category, and then has a bunch of panelists weigh in on each nominee. It’s a SMACKDOWN, people. It’s a RE-COUNT. With the readers being the sixth panelist, so if you want to participate follow the link below for your own ballot.

Nathaniel asked me to participate in the “Supporting Actress Smackdown”. The year in question? 1984.

The nominees:
Christine Lahti for Swing Shift
Lindsay Crouse for Places in the Heart
Peggy Ashcroft for Passage to India
Glenn Close for The Natural
Geraldine Page for The Pope of Greenwich Village

It had been a long time since I had seen any of these films. It was so much fun to re-visit.

The Smackdown will start on Wednesday, August 31st. With a podcast to follow.

Here’s the introductory post.

Posted in Actors, Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Review: In Order of Disappearance (2016)

large_large_A3MCE7xEcXgY5g2EqRkaTg9Tqlz

My review of In Order of Disappearance – a revenge-thriller-comedy – is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Attn: Jazz Buffs + People Who Saw Whiplash

I am no jazz buff. I liked Whiplash (with some serious reservations), but didn’t know enough to really judge the music being presented. It’s not like watching a movie about Alexander Hamilton or Stalin or Elvis, where I would be all over incorrect interpretations like a panther out of a tree.

My pal Glenn Kenny, who is brilliant on music in general, linked to a FASCINATING and in-depth (putting it mildly) examination of jazz – in particular the role of the drummer in jazz – and the problem with its portrayal in Whiplash. The essay is by pianist and composer and member of jazz-trio The Bad Plus, Ethan Iverson. I cannot speak to the validity of his observations. But I do know that I love people who know stuff and approach a topic they know well in a way that provides insight for me, the ignorant reader.

It’s long. As always, I recommend not skimming.

The Drum Thing, or, A Brief History of Whiplash, or, “I’m Generalizing Here”

Posted in Movies, Music | 9 Comments

Telegram from Elvis and The Colonel, February 1964

14064125_1083376901741440_1457770174502625984_n

Posted in Music | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Review: Spa Night (2016)

large_Spa-Night-Poster-2016

A gentle and slow and repressed “coming out but not really” story, taking place in the Koreatown neighborhood in Los Angeles. A first feature. Pacing-wise and story-wise, it has a couple of issues, but in general it’s a good film and extremely personal.

My review of Spa Night is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment