The Books: “Pride and Prejudice” (Jane Austen)

Next in my adult fiction shelves:

pride%20and%20prej%20pix.gifPride And Prejudice – by Jane Austen. I struggled to choose an excerpt from this book – it’s one that I love, and that I never get tired of. The long scenes of intense dialogue – the back and forth, with very little editorializing (until after the conversations end) – are my favorite parts of the book. You don’t get a lot of “she felt this” during these long conversations – that comes after. When you’re in the middle of it, in the middle of the dialogue – it unfolds organically (albeit very articulately) – and you don’t NEED to hear “she felt this”, “he thought this”. The personalities are there on the page, their needs, prides, prejudices (ahem) … So here’s an excerpt.


Excerpt from Pride And Prejudice – by Jane Austen.

While settling this point, she was suddenly roused by the sound of the door-bell, and her spirits were a little fluttered by the idea of its being Colonel Fitzwilliam himself, who had once before called late in the evening, and might now come to inquire particularly after her. But this idea was soon banished, and her spirits were very differently affected, when, to her utter amazement, she saw Mr. Darcy walk into the room. In an hurried manner he immediately began an inquiry after her health, imputing his visit to a wish of hearing that she were better. She answered him with cold civility. He sat down for a few moments, and then getting up, walked about the room. Elizabeth was surprised, but said not a word.

After a silence of several minutes, he came towards her in an agitated manner, and thus begun:

“In vain have I struggled. It will not do. My feelings will not be repressed. You must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you.”

Elizabeth’s astonishment was beyond expression. She stared, coloured, doubted, and was silent. This he considered sufficient encouragement; and the avowal of all that he felt, and ahd long felt for her, immediately followed. He spoke well; but there were feelings besides those of the heart to be detailed, and he was not more eloquent on the subject of tenderness than of pride. His sense of her inferiority – of its being a degradation – of the family obstacles which judgment had always opposed to inclination, were dwelt on with a warmth which seemed due to the consequence he was wounding, but was very unlikely to recommend his suit.

In spite of her deeply-rooted dislike, she could not be insensible to the compliment of such a man’s affection, and though her intentions did not vary for an instant, she was at first sorry for the pain he was to receive; till, roused to resentment by his subsequent language, she lost all compassion in anger. She tried, however, to compose herself to answer him with patience, when he should have done. He concluded with representing to her the strength of his attachment which, in spite of all his endeavours, he had found impossible to conquer, and with expressing his hope that it woudl now be rewarded by her acceptance of his hand. As he said this, she could easily see that he had no doubt of a favourable answer. He spoke of apprehension and anxiety, but his countenance expressed real security. Such a circumstance could only exasperate farther, and, when he ceased, the colour rose into her cheeks, and she said:

“In such cases as this, it is, I believe, the established mode to express a sense of obligation for the sentiments avowed, however unequally they may be returned. It is natural that obligation should be felt, and if I could feel gratitude, I would now thank you. But I cannot – I have never desired your good opinion, and you have certainly bestowed it most unwillingly. I am sorry to have occasioned pain to anyone. It has been most unconsciously done, however, and I hope will be of short duration. The feelings which, you tell me, have long prevented the acknowledgement of your regard, can have little difficulty in overcominng it after this explanation.”

Mr. Darcy, who was leaning against the mantelpiece with his eyes fixed on her face, seemed to catch her words with no less resentment than surprise. His complexion became pale with anger, and the disturbance of his mind was visible in every feature. He was struggling for the appearance of composure, and would not open his lips till he believed himself to have attained it. The pause was to Elizabeth’s feelings dreadful. At length, in a voice of forced calmness, he said:

“And this is all the reply which I am to have the honour of expecting? I might, perhaps, wish to be informed why, with so little endeavour or civility, I am thus rejected. But it is of small importance.”

“I might as well inquire,” replied she, “why with so evident a design of offending and insulting me, you chose to tell me that you liked me against your will, against your reason, and even against your character? Was not this some excuse for incivility, if I was uncivil? But I have other provocations. You know I have. Had not my own feelings decided against you – had they been indifferent, or had they even been favourable, do you think that any consideration would tempt me to accept the man who has been the means of ruining, perhaps for ever, the happiness of a most beloved sister?”

As she pronounced these words, Mr. Darcy changed colour; but the emotion was short, and he listened without attempting to interrupt her while she continued:

“I have ever reason in the world to think ill of you. No motive can excuse the unjust and ungenerous part you acted there. You dare not, you cannot deny that you have been the principal, if not the only means of dividing them from each other – of exposing one to the ensure of the world for caprice and instability, the other to its derision for disappointed hopes, and involving them both in misery of the acutest kind.”

She paused, and saw with no slight indignation that he was listening with an air which proved him wholly unmoved by any feeling of remorse. He even looked at her with a smile of affected incredulity.

“Can you deny that you have done it?” she repeated.

With assumed tranquillity he then replied: “I have no wish of denying that I did everything in my power to separate my friend from your sister, or that I rejoice in my success. Towards him I have been kinder than towards myself.”

Elizabeth disdained the appearance of noticing this civil reflection, but its meaning did not escape, nor was it likely to conciliate her.

“But it is not merely this affair,” she continued, “on which my dislike is founded. Long before it had taken place my opinion of you was decided. Your character was unfolded in the recital which I received many months ago from Mr. Wickham. On this subject, what can you have to say? In what imaginary act of friendship can you here defend yourself? or under what misrepresentation can you here impose upon others?”

“You take an eager interest in that gentleman’s concerns,” said Darcy, in a less tranquil tone, and with a heightened colour.

“Who that knows what his misfortunes have been, can help feeling an interest in him?”

“His misfortunes!” repeated Darcy contemptuously; “yes, his misfortunes have been great indeed.”

“And of your infliction,” cried Elizabeth with energy. “You have reduced him to his present state of poverty – comparative poverty. You have withheld the advantages which you must know to have been designed for him. You have deprived the best years of his life of that independence which was no less his due than his desert. You have done all this! and yet you can treat the mention of his misfortune with contempt and ridicule.”

“And this,” cried Darcy, as he walked with quick steps across the room, “is your opinion of me! This is the estimation in which you hold me! I thank you for explaining it so fully. My faults, according to this calculation, are heavy indeed! But perhaps,” added he, stopping in his walk, and turning towards her, “these offences might have been overlooked, had not your pride been hurt by my honest confession of the scruples that had long prevented my forming any serious design. These bitter accusations might have been suppressed, had I, with greater policy, concealed my struggles, and flattered you into the belief of my being impelled by unqualified, unalloyed inclination; by reason, by reflection, by everything. But disguise of every sort is my abhorrence. Nor am I ashamed of the feelings I related. They were natural and just. Could you expect me to rejoice in the inferiority of your connections? — to congratulate myself on the hope of relations, whose condition in life is so decidedly beneath my own?”

Elizabeth felt herself growing more angry every moment; yet she tried to the utmost to speak with composure when she said:

“You are mistaken, Mr. Darcy, if you suppose that the mode of your declaration affected me in any other way, than as it spared the concern which I might have felt in refusing you, had you behaved in a more gentlemanlike manner.”

She saw him start at this, but he said nothing, and she continued:

“You could not have made me the offer of your hand in any possible way that would have tempted me to accept it.”

Again his astonishment was obvious; and he looked at her with an expression of mingled incredulity and mortification. She went on:

“From the very beginning – from the first moment, I may almost say – of my acquaintance with you, your manners, impressing me with the fullest belief of your arrogance, your conceit, and your selfish disdain of the feelings of others, were such as to form that groundwork of disapprobation on which succeeding events have built so immovable a dislike; and I had not known you a month before I felt that you were the last man in the world whom I could ever be prevailed on to marry.”

“You have said quite enough, madam. I perfectly comprehend your feelings, and have now only to be ashamed of what my own have been. Forgive me for having taken up so much of your time,a nd accept my best wishes for your health and happiness.”

And with these words he hastily left the room, and Elizabeth heard him the next moment open the front door and quit the house.

This entry was posted in Books and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to The Books: “Pride and Prejudice” (Jane Austen)

  1. amelie / rae says:

    i.
    love.
    this.
    excerpt.
    !.

  2. amelie / rae says:

    just one question, tho — are you a 5-hour miniseries [Colin Firth] version person, or a 2-hour recent film [Keira Knightley] version person? or both, or neither?

  3. Ceci says:

    This book is one of my all-time favorites. I am not much of a re-reader, since I always have a thousand books on my reading queue, but P&P is one of the VERY few exceptions. I have to visit it at least once a year; I may not read all of it, but once I open my MASSIVE volume of Jane Austen’s complete novels, I always end up rereading my favorite P&P excerpts. It’s such a beloved story for me, I just need it from time to time.

    Oh, and of course I have this impossible, inevitable crush on Mr. Darcy that I can’t seem to get over… :P

  4. Ceci says:

    Oh, Colin Firth as Mr. Darcy…

    Excuse me, I have to swoon now.

  5. red says:

    I actually did not see the Keira Knightley version. I’m not sure how I feel about her as Elizabeth – and I suppose I should see it before I judge.

    Colin Firth – absolutely perfect!!!

  6. amelie / rae says:

    mm, Colin Firth as Darcy — delicious.

  7. Ann Marie says:

    I believe this is in my top 5 or maybe top 3 books of all time. And this scene… I love it. What I really love is how the BBC mini-series gets most of the dialog just as its written. And Amelia/Rae: the Keira Knightly version, in my opinion, is sub-standard. For some reason, they decided to make Darcy like Heathcliff. I believe at one point, the showed PIGS in their house as a way of showing that they were “poor”. Nutty. I have to say that I didn’t even watch all of it and then had to watch the entire 8 hours of the BBC version as a palate-cleansing.

  8. red says:

    Ann – I read a really good article somewhere about how the Keira Knightley movie tried to turn Austen into Bronte – and those two authors have VERY different sensibilities. Can you imagine Heathcliff strolling into an Austen novel? Uhm, no.

    I think of Austen’s books as being mainly indoors, and the Bronte books (Emily and Charlotte) as being … outdoors. Grappling with mother nature.

    Mr. Darcy is NOT Heathcliff – Heathcliff is almost a pagan savage dude.

    They’re both yummy male characters, though!

  9. Jeff says:

    I was pleasantly surprised by the Knightley version. Though I agree that the Colin Firth/Jennifer Ehle version remains definitive, I thought the film covered the novel as well as could be done in a 2-hour movie. The actor who played Darcy will never make anyone forget Colin Firth, but Keira Knightley was outstanding. Also, the score is one for the ages.

  10. Ceci says:

    I watched the two latest versions of P&P and liked both. My favorite is the BBC miniseries, because in addition to having Colin Firth play one of my favorite literary heros (I mean: Colin Firth! come on!), it comes the closest to how the book looks in my head as I read it. I also liked Jennifer Ehle as Lizzy. I usually watch all six one-hour episodes in one session; not many movies or miniseries can hook me like that.

    As for the Keira Knightley movie, I enjoy it for what it is: a beautiful movie, very entertaining, though rather loose in the adaptation department. In any case, the story is perfectly recognizable, I think the main elements of the story are present, and the score is terrific. I am not a fan of the “Bronteization” of Darcy or P&P, but if you can get past that, the movie is very nice.

  11. red says:

    I’ll have to put it on the Netflix queue.

    It’s actually kind of interesting to see multiple adaptations of the same story. Just another testament to the lasting power of the book, I guess.

  12. Kate says:

    I think I read the same article about trying to turn Austen into Bronte. I must admit I haven’t seen the Keira version, as I’m a little Pride and Prejudiced out, especially as there was a stage version of it in Chicago recently (Guy played Wickam!) But here’s my pet peeve, on behalf of all less-than-breathtakingly-beautiful actresses: Elizabeth Bennet is not, and should not be, a beauty!!!! That’s Jane’s office, not Elizabeth’s!!!!!!!

  13. red says:

    Kate –

    I didn’t know that about Guy as Wickham – ha!

    And you know, for me – sometimes – with books I love – I don’t need to see a movie version of it. Or – I hesitate. Just because the images I have of the characters are so strong in my mind.

  14. tracey says:

    This has got to be my favorite moment in the book. I reread this all the time.

    As for the movie versions, I’m a huge Colin Firth fan — love him as Darcy. And when I first saw the Keira version, I remember I referred to that particular Darcy on my blog as, um, tuber-faced, I believe. But then someone bought me the DVD of it and I’ve watched it several times now — because it is, after all, “Pride and Prejudice.” Like cinematic chocolate to me — I won’t say no.

    And …. you know what? I came to kinda like whatever-his-name-is as Darcy. He is still tuber-faced, that doesn’t change, but I decided at some point that I liked his voice, that I LIKED that he’s not empirically swoon-worthy, that I liked his particular edge. In a really weird way. It’s grown on me. This version is much more windswept and unruly, it’s true, and this scene you’ve excerpted is done outside in wild weather, but, man, it has a bite to it. It’s harsh and raw and not Austen-esque, but forgive me, I liked the way it played. It just kinda rips across the screen, makes the blood pound.

    And Keira is probably too beautiful for Elizabeth, but she’s angular in this, really thin, her features kind of jut out. Jane is soft and golden and blonde and haloed almost so that worked for me. I liked the contrast between the sisters, just physically.

    Donald Sutherland as Mr. Bennet? I LOVED him. So much. The scene where Lizzie talks to her father about Darcy, about how she loves him now — I bawl every time.

    However …. there’s the issue of the weird weird moment at the verry end. You’ll have to rent it to see.

    Um, am I done? Lord, how embarrassing. Sorry to ramble, Sheila!

  15. Ceci says:

    I don’t know about Sheila, but I loved your “ramble”, Tracey! I agree with you 100%!

    The guy playing Darcy (Matthew Macfaddyen is his name – I’m not sure about the spelling) is no Colin Firth, but I loved his voice and his giving Darcy more of a helpless, shy quality, while at the same time coming across as aloof.

    I also agree about the weirdness of the ending. In Argentina that scene at the end was not included in the version shown in theaters, but it was included in the DVD – but I just skip it altogether… ;)

    Now I’m the one doing the rambling. Sorry, Sheila!

  16. red says:

    What’s with the apologies, yo??? For rambling? About movies and books?

    That’s what de whole point is here!

    hahaha

    You all can ramble on my site until 2015 and I’ll never get sick of it.

  17. DAW says:

    Perhaps Elizabeth shouldn’t be “beautiful”, but there’s nothing wrong with making her attractive. Darcy himself calls her “the handsomest woman of my acquaintance” or something of that sort, late in the book. Of course, he’s probably trying to irritate Bingley’s sister.

Leave a Reply to Ann Marie Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.