The Books: “Life of Pi” (Yann Martel)

Daily Book Excerpt: Adult fiction:

Life of Pi by Yann Martel

0156027321.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpgThere was a good year when you looked around at people on the subway, and you always knew that at least one of them would be reading Life of Pi. It was everywhere. My sister gave it to me for my birthday a couple years ago – she had loved it.

I finally picked it up in 2006 (I have to be in the mood for fiction – and I have also expressed before my natural – and sometimes unfair – antipathy to really popular books that “everyone” seems to be reading.) – but in 2006 I read a lot of new fiction, popular stuff – and Life of Pi was one of those books. I read it in 3 days. Couldn’t put it down.

To me, the book was really about narrative – how we create our own stories, to survive this life. I wrote about that here. The entire book is a gripping shipwreck tale – a young Indian boy and a Bengal tiger named Richard Parker (how much do we love Richard Parker??) – trapped in a lifeboat, hundreds, maybe thousands of miles from land … but there is a twist at the end (I wouldn’t dream of giving it away) that calls it all into question. But it’s not a gimmick, or an M. Night Shamalamayan device – it struck me as totally plausible. Narrative is what we humans have. It is what we have always had. From the first caveman who came “home” and drew pictures on a wall to show his triumph over a woolly mammoth. We tell stories to each other. Some are true, some are lies, some are exaggerations. There are all kinds of reasons for stories. Some people are pathological with their stories, and you can’t tell what is true. Some people THINK they don’t tell stories – they think that there is such a thing as “the way it is”, objectivity, etc. – so they tell their stories in a different manner than the person who tells the story about the biggest fish he caught – where exaggeration is understood, and accepted. But when you get right down to it, each of us are trapped in our own experience – there is only one me, there is only one you … Nobody can tell me what it is like to be ME, and I cannot presume to know what it is like to be you. All we have, as in-roads into each other’s lives, are the stories we tell one another. And each story is basically us saying, “This is who I am. This is what it is like for me.”

Life of Pi, for the most part, didn’t feel like a story, or a tall tale. It is written in unsentimental clear language, and much of it is structured in a “so this happened next”, “and then this happened”. manner, Much of it is nearly unbelievable. I mean, he is on a tiny lifeboat with a Bengal tiger. But the way Yann Martel writes Pi’s experiences … how he figures out how to survive – not just the lifeboat experience – but the lifeboat experience with a dangerous man-eating animal 2 feet away. It is one of the all-time great survival stories. He must figure out the food situation, the water situation – he must somehow feed Richard Parker – so that Richard Parker doesn’t eat HIM – but he also must feed himself. Pi is not a super-human. He is a teenager. But in this particular situation, the life-force asserts himself, and he does what it takes. He has to be very creative. I read the book, and at one point I thought, “My God. What would I do in this situation? Would I give up?” It’s relentless.

One of the things I really loved about the book was that Richard Parker was not anthropomorphized. He obviously had a personality – most animals do – he has reactions to things, he makes eye contact with Pi, he snarls, etc. – and Pi definitely forms a “relationship” to Richard Parker – but it is out of necessity. Or – partly necessity. The excerpt I chose to post today shows that there is a bit more going on there for Pi … but it’s not like Richard Parker is, at heart, a cuddly warm beast just DYING for the chance to “make friends” with an Indian boy. No. He is a ferocious animal. And he always seems dangerous. He always seems “other” – meaning: he does not seem like a human being in a tiger suit. Ever. He is always a tiger. Yann Martel really goes into all of this – what tigers are like, how they behave … Richard Parker, as tiger, totally comes alive. If you’ve read the book, don’t you think that is true? He just seems so alive to me. But still alien.

The “author’s note” at the beginning of the book (which sets up the almost documentary feel to the whole thing … it’s written as though it is non-fiction, or as though it is a journalist’s rendering of this amazing shipwreck story) contains the phrase: “I know a story that will make you believe in God.”

That’s quite a promise.

But it also goes back to what I was saying before – about narrative, and the different purposes of narrative in our lives. It has been with us from the beginning of consciousness. Why do we tell stories? To entertain, to explain, to deflect criticism, to puff ourselves up with importance … there are a million reasons. Life of Pi, from the get-go, is set up as a “story” – many books are not, of course – even though they are, indeed, stories. But other books have a trompe l’oeil feel – it’s a different kind of story. Life of Pi admits, at the beginning, that this is a “story”. The story itself is so gripping that you lose yourself in it (or at least, I did) – and then – at the very end, you are reminded, once again, that this is a story. Story does not equal lie, by the way – although sometimes stories are lies. And sometimes a lie is just as good as the truth, or even better. A lie can help us survive this awful world, with its tragedies and unfairness. And so at the end of Life of Pi, the story re-asserts itself, as STORY – the reader must grapple with the implications of that. And we are faced with a choice: which story do we believe? One is “the better story”. One is (or might be) the truth. We have to choose. Just like Pi had to choose.

If you haven’t read Life of Pi, I highly recommend it.

Here’s an excerpt.


EXCERPT FROMLife of Pi by Yann Martel

It was Richard Parker who calmed me down. It is the irony of this story that the one who scared me witless to start with was the very same who brought me peace, purpose, I dare say even wholeness.

He was looking at me intently. After a time I recognized the gaze. I had grown up with it. It was the gaze of a contented animal looking out from its cage or pit the way you or I would look out from a restaurant table after a good meal, when the time has come for conversation and people-watching. Clearly, Richard Parker had eaten his fill of hyena and drunk all the rainwater he wanted. No lips were rising and falling, no teeth were showing, no growling or snarling was coming from him. He was simply taking me in, observing me, in a manner that was sober but not menacing. He kept twitching his ears and varying the sideways turn of his head. It was all so, well, catlike. He looked like a nice, big, fat domestic cat, a 45-pound tabby.

He made a sound, a snort from his nostrils. I pricked up my ears. He did it a second time. I was astonished. Prusten?

Tigers make a variety of sounds. They include a number of roars and growls, the loudest of these being most likely the full-throated aaonh, usually made during the mating season by males and oestrous females. It’s a cry that travels far and wide, and is absolutely petrifying when heard close up. Tigers go woof when they are caught unawares, a short, sharp detonation of fury that would instantly make your legs jump up and run away if they weren’t frozen to the spot. When they charge, tigers put out throaty, coughing roars. The growl they use for purposes of threatening has yet another guttural quality. And tigers hiss and snarl, which, depending on the emotion behind it, sounds either like autumn leaves rustling on the ground, but a little more resonant, or, when it’s an infuriated snarl, like a giant door with rusty hinges slowly opening – in both cases, utterly spine-chilling. Tigers make other sounds too. They grunt and they moan. They purr, though not as melodiously or as frequently as small cats, and only as they breathe out. (Only small cats purr breathing both ways. It is one of the characteristics that distinguishes big cats from small cats. Another is that only big cats can roar. A good thing that is. I’m afraid the popularity of the domestic cat would drop very quickly if little kitty could roar its displeasure.) Tigers even go meow, with an inflection similar to that of domestic cats, but louder and in a deeper range, not as encouraging as one to bend down and pick them up. And tigers can be utterly, majestically silent, that too.

I had heard all these sounds growing up. Except for prusten. If I knew of it, it was because Father had told me about it. He had read descriptions of it in the literature. But he had heard it only once, while on a working visit to the Mysore Zoo, in their animal hospital, from a young male being treated for pneumonia. Prusten is the quietest of tiger calls, a puff through the nose to express friendliness and harmless intentions.

Richard Parker did it again, this time with a rolling of the head. He looked exactly as if he were asking me a question.

I looked at him, full of fearful wonder. There being no immediate threat, my breath slowed down, my heart stopped knocking about in my chest, and I began to regain my senses.

I had to tame him. It was at that moment that I realized this necessity. It was not a question of him or me, but of him and me. We were, literally and figuratively, in the same boat. We would live – or we would die – together. He might be killed in an accident, or he could die shortly of natural causes, bt it would be foolish to count on such an eventuality. More likely the worst would happen: the simple passage of time, in which his animal toughness would easily outlast my human frailty. Only if I tamed him could I possibly trick him into dying first, if we had to come to that sorry business.

But there’s more to it. I will come clean. I will tell you a secret: a part of me was glad about Richard Parker. A part of me did not want Richard Parker to die at all, because if he did I would be left alone with despair, a foe even more formidable than a tiger. If I still had the will to live, it was thanks to Richard Parker. He kept me from thinking too much about my family and my tragic circumstances. He pushed me to go on living. I hated him for it, yet at the same time I was grateful. I am grateful. It’s the plain truth: without Richard Parker, I wouldn’t be alive today to tell you my story.

I looked around at the horizon. Didn’t I have here a perfect circus ring, inescapably round, without a single corner for him to hide in? I looked down at the sea. Wasn’t this an ideal source of treats with which to condition him to obey? I noticed a whistle hanging from one of the life jackets. Wouldn’t this make a good whip with which to keep him in line? What was missing here to tame Richard Parker? Time? It might be weeks before a ship sighted me. I had all the time in the world. Resolve? There’s nothing like extreme need to give you resolve. Knowledge? Was I not a zookeeper’s son? Reward? Was there any reward greater than life? Any punishment worse than death? I looked at Richard Parker. My panic was gone. My fear was dominated. Survival was at hand.

Let the trumpets blare. Let the drums roll. Let the show begin. I rose to my feet. Richard Parker noticed. The balance was not easy. I took a deep breath and shouted, “Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, hurry to your seats! Hurry, hurry. You don’t want to be late. Sit down, open your eyes, open your hearts and prepare to be amused. Here it is, for your enjoyment and instruction, for your gratification and edification, the show you’ve been waiting for all your life, THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH! Are you ready for the miracle of it? Yes? Well then: they are amazingly adaptable. You’ve seen them in freezing, snow-covered temperate forests. You’ve seen them in dense, tropical monsoon jungles. You’ve seen them in sparse, semi-arid scrublands. You’ve seen them in brackish mangrove swamps. Truly, the would fit anywhere. But you’ve never seen them where you are about to see them now! Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, without further ado, it is my pleasure and honour to present to you: THE PI PATEL, INDO-CANADIAN, TRANS-PACIFIC, FLOATING CIRCUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSSS!!! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE!

I had an effect on Richard Parker. At the very first blow of the whistle he cringed and he snarled. Ha! Let him jump into the water if he wanted to! Let him try!

TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE!

He roared and he clawed the air. But he did not jump. He might not be afraid of the sea when he was driven mad by hunger and thirst, but for the time being it was a fear I could rely on.

TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE! TREEEEEE!

He backed off and dropped to the bottom of the boat. The first training session was over. It was a resounding success. I stopped whistling and sat down heavily on the raft, out of breath and exhausted.

And so it came to be.

Plan Number Seven: Keep Him Alive.

This entry was posted in Books and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to The Books: “Life of Pi” (Yann Martel)

  1. The Books: “The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin” (H.W. Brands)

    And here is my next excerpt of the day from my library. Next book in my American history section is The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin by H.W. Brands. As you can probably tell I have…

  2. Jayne says:

    I need to read this, I think. Thanks for the push.

  3. The Books: “Emily’s Quest” (L.M. Montgomery)

    Next book on the shelf … Emily’s Quest – by L.M. Montgomery The whole ‘furnishing of the Disappointed House’ section is fantastically written. It’s so domestic, so SPECIFIC – Lucy Maud gets into the decorating details with exquisite details ……

  4. The Books: Further Chronicles of Avonlea: ‘Tannis of the Flats’ (L.M. Montgomery)

    Next book on the shelf … Further Chronicles of Avonlea – “Tannis of the Flats” – by L.M. Montgomery This story is really interesting, I think, because of the racial aspect. Lucy Maud doesn’t really deal with racial issues -…

  5. ricki says:

    I am still thinking about this book, and what the whole thing meant, three years after I read it. Especially the whole story/fact/truth/lie question.
    Because as a scientist, I’m programmed to accept as “fact” what can be verified, either by my own senses or by instruments. And yet, because of my faith, there are things I accept as “truth” that can’t be measured…and so Life of Pi kind of raises all those questions again. And as I said, I still think about it, particularly the ending.

    That’s the mark of a pretty amazing book, for me.

  6. red says:

    I took care of the comment issue, ricki!

    I remember being blindsided by the ending when I first read it – I totally did not see it coming. I wonder if anyone who has read it “guessed” beforehand – to me, it came as a total shock and made me re-think everything (a similar situation happened with Atonement – another ending that blindsided me).

    I very much liked the whole question of “what is the better story” … As I go thru my life, I find myself more and more having to make a choice between stories. Even in how I interpret my past. Not that I am a total fantasist – that’s not what the “what is the better story” is about, I don’t think …

    Maybe it’s the part of me that is a writer, you know? The part that is always creating a narrative, even from a simple trip to a deli.

    I’m still thinking about the book, too. It was really good.

  7. tracey says:

    Ah, I loved this book. And as I was clicking on your excerpt, I said to myself, “Oh, I hope she’s gonna do the TREEEE TREEEE part!”

    About the ending – it’s weird. Over the last few years, I feel like I’ve read so many books where the ending was just so disappointing to me. It copped out or left things hanging or just seemed plain stupid to me. So I was so just JOYOUS and GRATEFUL, actually, to reach the end of this book and have it totally surprise me. I had someone say to me about the book, “Oh, yeah, really clever ending.” And it bugged me, because I saw it as beyond “clever”; it was deep, if you bothered with it at all beyond the surface. It was profound. The better story. What we believe. This person was more like, “Oh, good twist.” Uhm, you’ve missed it entirely. Please stop talking to me.

    Another person I recommended the book to — a church acquaintance — emailed me later saying, “It says it’s a book that will make you believe in God. Well, I don’t think THAT’S true.” Like, she was actually irritated with me that I didn’t recommend a “Christian” book and with the book because it wasn’t “Christian” enough. These people exhaust me. I wrote her back and said something like, “Well, yeah, the book doesn’t make any promises that it will help you accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior, if that’s what you were hoping for. I kinda think there’s another book for that. It’s not a proselytizing tool.” She was bugged by the lack of Jesus in the book – based on her own misinterpretation of the promise “This is a book that will make you believe in God.” I couldn’t talk to her anymore after that and I think the feeling was pretty much mutual – ha.

    And then I sit and wonder why I’m not more popular with other Christians. Hm. I see a crack of light ….

  8. red says:

    I feel sorry for people like that. They miss so much in life. Keep those blinders on, peeps, if that’s how you get thru the damn day!

    I agree, tracey, that it wasn’t just a “twist” at the end – it was an ending that had a profound and mysterious truth in it. It really stayed with me. It made me look at my own life, and my own stories, etc.

    It was quite challenging, in its way – so perhaps it shouldn’t surprise me that that lady had to close her mind off to it.

    I love, too, that you wanted me to pick out the “TREEEEEE” excerpt. Seriously, like I’ve told you … you are psychic!

  9. melissa says:

    First, I have to say that I started reading the book excerpt with a sinking heart, because of your no-comments these days, because I wanted to comment on this book. Then, saw that you had opened the book comments. (I hope all is well. I miss your comment section, but understand wanting… not to have them)

    So, the book. I read very little popular fiction, but was in an airport in Canada, having finished the book I brought with me and decided to pick this one up. And LOVED it. Now, I need to read it again so I can remember what happened past – boy, tiger, boat, surprise ending.

  10. red says:

    melissa – I’m like you – not really a popular fiction girl, but I tried a bunch last year – from recommendations from people I respect – and was very happily surprised with many of them! Life of Pi was one.

    I was flipping thru this morning and had forgotten much of it myself … although the zebra’s death-throes remain totally vivid – I actually shed a tear when I read the book the first time over that damn zebra.

  11. Diana says:

    I just left a long comment on the last DBE so I’ll try to be brief! One thing that I always feel upon reading these is that I simply don’t bring enough of myself to my reading.

    I did read this book and I liked it a lot. But when I read your take on it, I feel like the book I read was a lot paler than the one you read. This happens all the time! Where am I when I’m reading?

  12. ateenyi says:

    wow. i’m not sure how to talk about this book. for starters, i believe that it was full of God… or at least of “Wonder”, and i tend to view the two as being somewhat synonymous.

    first, there was Pi’s poly-Faithism (is that even a word?), and just the way that aspect of the story was told. i mean, there was no greater kind-of ecumenical objective or whatever. just a boy who loved God and wanted to worship and partake of every known aspect of this Deity. i found that incredible.

    then of course the story and “the twist”. funny – i didn’t get the twist. i bought the tiger story so entirely that i saw its alternative as some kind of a poke at people’s inability to… to BELIEVE. it was only after talking to my sister about the book that i realised that the point was to have two very real, plausible endings. and then funny thing – i went back and re-read the ending and still found the richard parker story the “easier” (for want of a better word) one to believe. does that speak to a certain wilful naivety?

    thanks for this book review.

  13. red says:

    Diana – I really appreciated both of your comments. Thank you so much.

  14. red says:

    ateenyi – you make me want to go back and have another look at the ending myself, see what I think about it.

  15. The Books: “Shopgirl: A Novella” (Steve Martin)

    Next book in my Daily Book Excerpt – on my adult fiction shelves: Shopgirl A Novella by Steve Martin I have great fondness for this lovely and piercing short book. Steve Martin, as a writer (his plays, his essays in…

  16. ricki says:

    I also found “the story with the animals” easier to believe…and far more appealing.

    I read this book with my (now disbanded) book club, and as I remember, no one anticipated the ending. (Not even the woman who always had to “prove” she was “smarter” than the rest of us).

    This is one of those books that I feel like if I really understood what the author was getting at, I’d understand life and the universe better. I feel like there’s something I’m not quite grasping and my mind keeps going back to it. But then again – maybe I’d not be happy if I understood everything about how the world works.

  17. red says:

    ricki – I totally know what you mean. my mind keeps going back to it too.

  18. The Books: “The Time Traveler’s Wife” (Audrey Niffenegger)

    Next book on my adult fiction shelves: The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger This is not my kind of book. I never would have picked it up on my own, for multiple reasons: 1. It’s “popular fiction” – and…

  19. Haileyrose Hodges says:

    how is the exerpt different than the book?

Leave a Reply to Jayne Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.