“I just sat at the drums and said, ‘Can I have a go?’ I just took to it.” — Honey Lantree

It’s her birthday.

Even now, a “girl drummer” in an all-boy band is a rare thing. Back in the 1960s, it was unheard of. Which is why Honey Lantree, drummer for the Joe Meek-produced The Honeycombs, stands out. Still. When she joined the band, she was working as a hairdresser. People refused to even believe she was doing it. People thought she was “pretending” drumming to a track already laid down. She was treated as a “gimmick”. It’s outrageous.

The Honeycombs’ biggest hit, “Have I the Right?”, was #1 in the UK, and #5 in the United States. The Honeycombs didn’t “go the distance” as a band, although they toured the world. They toured with Gene Vincent. History may deem them a one-hit wonder, but people still remember that song. It’s an ear-grabber.

Interestingly enough, right before she died at the age of 74, Honey Lantree came up in a discussion on Facebook. Someone linked to the Elvis talk I gave in Memphis, in which I referenced the absolutely BONKERS final moment of Spinout. Someone in the comments section, a woman, posted a picture of Elvis’ “band” in Spinout, all boys, with – a girl drummer. A spunky sassy one-of-the-boys girl drummer.

I said, in response, “Hey, it’s like The Honeycombs” and the woman who posted the Spinout pic said, “The girl drummer in Spinout and Honey Lantree inspired me as a kid to become a drummer.” Karen Carpenter also said that when she saw The Honeycombs on The Ed Sullivan Show, it inspired her to become a drummer.

One-hit wonder? Okay. But you never know “how far that little candle throws his beams.”

Here are The Honeycombs performing “Have I The Right?” It’s a banger!

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Music, On This Day | Tagged , | 4 Comments

“I do not ever want to be a huge star.” — Tuesday Weld

It’s her birthday today.

1968_Pretty Poison_Weld_Perkins

From the great “Pretty Poison” (1968) with Anthony Perkins. And below you can see her as the creepily blank and heart-achingly gorgeous teenage majorette in the fantastic opening sequence of the film.

1173763_10151657852872632_1096713554_n

See Pretty Poison if you have not. Don’t miss Kim’s essay about Pretty Poison. In Pretty Poison, Weld shows up as the bombshell blonde teenager, restless in her small-town life, bored out of her mind (Weld was thrilling when she was bored because then she started yearning for excitement/stimulation/something to DO … and by that point, look out). She’s looking for escape and release, she’s empty on some level, and emptiness can be filled by bad-ness just as easily as it can by goodness. Bad-ness is certainly more exciting.

Also:

wild2

From the wonderful “Wild in the Country” (1961).

Weld was only a teenager when she made Wild in the Country but she is fantastic as the wild-child bored-out-of-her-mind, her horniness indistinguishable from boredom and disgust, the so-called local bad-girl who torments Elvis Presley’s character, a man trying (under court order) to stay good, clean, on the right side of the law. She practically begs him to “take” her. With all of her impulsive shenanigans, there is a quiet moment in the middle of the film, where Presley and Weld perch on a rickety back stairway, and he sings, and she listens. There’s a stillness, a communion between these two hard-to-be-pinned-down misunderstood-sex-outlaws … when everything slows to a standstill, and they can just be. They’re kindred spirits.

Elvis puts her off until, in the kitchen scene, after he adjusts her dress strap (because he’s aroused by that flash of uninterrupted creamy shoulder), he finally succumbs in an act of aggression that you rarely saw in Elvis films after this, where he was basically the somewhat submissive and amused recipient of the attentions of hordes of women. But Weld brought out the tiger in him.

I mean, who can blame him? Tuesday Weld was (and still is) irresistible.

Weld and Presley dated (if you can say that either of them ever “dated” in a traditional sense) and Weld had this to say about Presley:

He walked into a room and everything stopped. Elvis was just so physically beautiful that even if he didn’t have any talent . . . just his face, just his presence. And he was funny, charming, and complicated, but he didn’t wear it on his sleeve. You didn’t see that he was complicated. You saw great needs.

You could also say that she didn’t wear things on her sleeve. She was complicated but she didn’t walk around broadcasting that. You could also say that you look at her and see “great needs.”


Tuesday Weld and Elvis Presley.

There’s her chilly portrait of Los Angeles malaise in Play It As It Lays, based on Joan Didion’s novel (I wrote about the book for Sight & Sound, for their feature on the best books about Hollywood). Reunited with Anthony Perkins, Weld is an almost opaque figure here, eerily blank, the blank-ness not emptiness so much as almost total dissociation.

Again, let me point you towards Kim Morgan, who wrote gorgeously about the film for Quentin Tarantino’s New Beverly Cinema website. Kim writes:

Hollywood, already filled with vipers and leeches and artists and muses, is the perfect backdrop for this type of dramatic discernment, as model and actress Maria (Tuesday Weld, very much a Sedgwick/Cassady mold breaker), wanders through the spread-out city with all of its surrounding areas and high desert lonesome in a state of depressive detachment and grim determination of … something. She’s not sure.

There are so many other roles: her fascinating cameo as the whorehouse “madame” in Once Upon a Time in America, her thankless role in Michael Mann’s Thief, which she fills to capacity with her alert listening humanity, taking in James Caan’s words with curiosity but also confusion, the whiff of her sordid former life all over her face: you don’t even need to know where she’s been to know where she’s been.

There’s sadness there too. There usually is with Weld. I want to point to her WACKY performance in Lord Love a Duck, which shows what she can really do, shows her difference from other actresses. It’s not easy to play a scene like this one, and it’s hard to imagine another actress being bold enough, fearless enough, WILD enough, to make the choices she makes in this scene:

Tuesday Weld has one of the most passionate and devoted fan bases on the planet, even through – or maybe because of – her long years of retirement.

I mean, remember this?

Matthew-Sweet

That album came out in 1990. She now works so rarely. Her heyday was decades ago. But there she was. Aggressive. Insolent. Knowing. And stop-you-in-your-tracks gorgeous. You wondered what life was really like for her. You were never quite sure.

She’s still out there. And she wants nothing to do with her own fame, with her own fans. This was who she was all along. When Weld was done, she was really DONE.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Actors, Movies, On This Day | Tagged , | 7 Comments

“You can understand a lot about yourself by working out which fairytale you use to present your world to yourself in.” — A.S. Byatt

I didn’t mark the passing of A.S. Byatt last year when it happened. I was overwhelmed with work at the time. But I did take a moment … a very still and silent moment … to reflect on her, on what her work has meant to me, what it has given me, the years and years I was lucky enough to experience, years where she was an active and prolific writer, putting out a book every year or so. A new AS Byatt was something to look forward to. I read it all, even her more obscure books, about Coleridge and Wordsworth, about literary history, her published “talks” on storytelling, fairy tales, myths … all of which she incorporated gorgeously in her fiction.

She is a rigorous read, and I love a rigorous read.

It’s her birthday today.

More, much more, after the jump.

Continue reading

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“I like to sing to women with meat on their bones and that long green stuff in their pocketbook.” — Wynonie Harris

It’s the birthday today of the influential blues shouter Wynonie Harris.

I’ll hand the microphone over to Nick Tosches, because why would I bother to try to add to it? Tosches devoted a chapter in his book Unsung Heroes of Rock ‘n Roll to this hugely important figure. When Harris was hired by bandleader Lucky Millinder in 1944 to replace Rosetta Tharpe as his lead singer, Harris was already a “local sensation” (in whatever locale he visited, that is. He very quickly dominated any market he performed in). Millinder represented a break for him but very quickly (immediately, really) he moved from hired hand to headliner. He was BIG. Harris was a thrilling performer, he used everything he had, a real blues shouter, full-body performance (someone once said Elvis’ shenanigans were mild compared to Harris).

Tosches starts the chapter with this very Tosches-esque line:

We know that rock ‘n’ roll was not a human invention, that it was the work of the Holy Ghost.

Oh Tosches, never change.

Harris started in the 1930s, “hit” in the 1940s, and then watched as the new decade rolled through, and “rock” became a “thing”, or – put another way – it got a NAME, but he had already been DOING it. You can’t blame him for pointing at all the youngsters saying, “I WAS DOING IT FIRST.” His time with Millinder was short, but they recorded two songs for Decca, both of which were hits, especially “Who Threw the Whiskey in the Well?” (recorded in 1944 and released in 1945)

Harris was too big to be contained, too wild to control. He recorded with a bunch of different labels before signing with King. Tosches again:

The music-business establishment was hesitant in its acceptance of Wynonie Harris and his vigorously vulgar style of shouting the blues. In its review of his ‘Young, and Wild’, Billboard remarked rather aloofly that the record might perhaps be “Good for the back rooms at the Harlem spots.” But it sold, and that’s what mattered.

Harris was TOO MUCH in all things: he lived fast, indulged in drink, in women, in flashy cars, in bragging: he was the ultimate showman living the ultimate showman’s life. I have a feeling that the recordings – as thrilling as they are – can’t hold a candle to what he must have been like live. He generated audience frenzies. He’d come back to his dressing room and women would be hiding there saying, “Please come home with me.” He often “complied”. Unless they were white women, which they often were. In that case, he would literally hide from them. He didn’t want the trouble. The point is: He was electric!

There’s “Drinkin’ Wine Spo Dee O Dee” – again, covered by everyone in the decades that followed.

There’s the explicit “Lovin’ Machine” from 1951:

In 1948, he recorded “Good Rockin’ Tonight”, which had already been covered by a number of people, but this is the one Elvis heard. Everybody heard it.

Nick Tosches again:

He has been remembered by those who knew him as a wild man, a creature of lurid excesses. Roy Brown, who wrote “Good Rockin’ Tonight,” recalled that “He’d walk into a bar and shout ‘Here comes the blues!’ He was wild. He’d jump off the bar and say, ‘Man, I’ll eat you up!’ He was like that. He got shot through the head, he got shot through the ears, he’d get beat up, but he didn’t mean no harm.” (For the record, the only shooting injury sustained by Harris was one in the hand, inflicted by an irate cuckold.)

So that’s how it was.

There are some pretty funny quotes about Harris in that Tosches chapter from those who knew him. “He was very loud and very vulgar.” “This man was a concept. Hell, he was too much.”

The music “developments” (mild word for a chaotic explosion) in the 1950s changed the present, altered the future, and erased the past. It has taken decades of work to rebuild the eradicated timeline, to place things in their proper context, to restore important figures to their rightful spot. History sometimes happens this way. Mythologies erected themselves overnight. A hierarchy was quickly created, almost organically. That hierarchy had great staying power. Which means that massively important figures like Rosetta Tharpe and Wynonie Harris were in many ways forgotten for decades. Nobody was “thinking” about this AS it was happening (or, they were, but what they were thinking was: “How long can I ride this wave?” “What do I need to do to keep myself in the game?”) What I’m trying to lead up to is, the great Wynonie Harris fell into obscurity almost overnight, a casualty of the craziness. The way it all played out in the ’50s, the explosion of rockabilly (“rise” is too calm a word) didn’t leave room for anything that WASN’T part of the initial whirlwind. The rupture was so violent nothing survived from “the time before” (meaning: last week). And so Wynonie Harris vanished. He kept recording. He kept performing. He drank himself to death. It’s a sad story. He said things like “I like this Elvis kid, but you should have seen what I was like.”

I wish I had, Wynonie!!

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Music, On This Day | Tagged , | 2 Comments

“I try to lie as much as I can when I’m interviewed. It’s reverse psychology. I figure if you lie, they’ll print the truth.” — River Phoenix

It’s his birthday today.

Just as I will never get over Kurt Cobain’s death, and will never stop missing him and wondering what he would be doing now, I will never get over River Phoenix’s death. Losing the two of them in the space of six months was a mile-marker for my generation. I will never stop missing both of them. I will never stop wondering “What would River Phoenix be doing now? What kind of roles would he get? What kind of middle-aged actor would he have grown into?”

One of the most popular and well-trafficked post in the history of my site – people are still finding it, still leaving comments – is the conversation Matt Seitz and I had about Dogfight.

Dan Callahan is eloquent on River Phoenix in his book The Art of American Screen Acting, vol. 2, and we discussed it when I interviewed him.

Keanu Reeves and River Phoenix, 1991, for Interview magazine:

From interview with the two actors in Interview magazine, 1991:

KR: Um, who knows? I really would like to do Shakespeare with River. I think we’d have a hoot. We could do A Midsummer Night’s Dream or Romeo and Juliet.

RP: I’ll be Juliet.

Posted in Actors, Movies, On This Day | Tagged | 6 Comments

“Good friends, let’s to the fields.” — Edgar Lee Masters’ epitaph

Edgar Lee Masters (born on this day) was a lawyer (one of his law partners was Clarence Darrow!) and a poet. He published a couple of books and biographies (one of Walt Whitman, a poet he admired). He was no slouch. But a major poet? No.

However, he ended up writing a series of poems told from the point of view of the dead citizens of a small town called Spoon River (Spoon River Anthology) that has to be one of the most popular books of poetry of all time. Edgar Lee Masters has a kind of success that most poets can only dream of.

Like so many poets of this era, one name appears in the biography as essential: Harriet Monroe, founder and editor of Poetry magazine. She published so many new people, people who couldn’t find homes for their work in more traditional magazines. Masters sent her his Spoon River poems, and she eventually helped him put it all together in a book, and publish it. It was an immediate success. It struck a chord. It still does.

Edgar Lee Masters would not have been known if he hadn’t taken on the job of “mimic”, or “mouthpiece”, whatever you want to call it. What happens in these “Spoon River” poems is you hear specific voices, cadences, accents, emotions, these people are raw. They have nothing to hide. They’re dead. They are dead, yes, but they plead with us, the living, to hear their stories, to understand what happened. They plead with us, for retribution, forgiveness. They reach out from beyond the grave, trying to either make things right, or be heard, or to defend their horrible actions. Death has NOT been a release for these people. None of them sit in the blessed light of Jesus, forgiven and peaceful. The afterlife is a bleak place writhing with unfinished business.

Masters imagines his way into another person’s psyche, and then speaks AS THEM. That is his gift. He is a mouthpiece. Being a great mouthpiece means you have an even better ear. You have to listen well to be a great mimic. If he had been writing verse about the beautiful sunset over his town or the way the river looked at dawn or about his childhood memories, we’d never be anthologizing him. Spoon River Anthology put him on the map. It was a success during his lifetime, too. He didn’t have to wait until after his death to have his say.

One of my great acting teachers in college, Kimber Wheelock (tribute to him here) had us pick out poems from “Spoon River” to work on as dramatic monologues. It’s a great assignment for student actors since every poem is filled with character details, back story, objectives, secrets, lies, catharsis. The most important question an actor has to know how to answer: Why am I saying this? Why do I NEED to say this? (whatever it is) – is so present in Spoon River, I mean that’s what they’re all about. You have one chance to say what you need to say from beyond the grave: what will you choose, and why? Those “Spoon River” classes were gratifying work, and I still remember which one I chose, poor cross-eyed Minerva Jones. I was 18 when I worked on this in class. I can still recite it by heart.

Minerva Jones

I am Minerva, the village poetess,
Hooted at, jeered at by the Yahoos of the street
For my heavy body, cock-eye, and rolling walk,
And all the more when “Butch” Weldy
Captured me after a brutal hunt.
He left me to my fate with Doctor Meyers;
And I sank into death, growing numb from the feet up,
Like stepping deeper and deeper into a stream of ice.
Will someone go to the village newspaper
And gather into a book the verses I wrote?–
I thirsted so for love!
I hungered so for life!

Here’s the thing: You cannot “phone in” those two final lines. They must be real, they must come from a real place. Masters’ gift was capturing all of the griefs/anger/seething resentments of small-town America, and by breaking it up into small chunks like that, by the end of that book, you have a full tapestry. No matter who you are, where you come from, you will find a little bit of yourself in Spoon River Anthology. It might be spread out over 5 or 6 poems – you relate to a little bit of this one, a little bit of that one … and taken on as a whole, it starts to feel like he has somehow captured all of humanity in it.

Each poem is a whole world in miniature. People are naming names, man, after death: they want us to know WHO did this to them, who hurt them, who betrayed them. Each voice is specific, you can hear the old men, young girls, frumpy housewives, mechanics, the local doctor. Edgar Lee Masters had a unique ear: he could hear everybody.

If any of you out there are acting teachers of beginning actors in the age-range of, oh, 17 to 22 … consider using Spoon River Anthology as a source of monologues for your class. Or read the book yourself, and assign a poem to each person, based on what you know about that person, what they might need to work on, etc. I would say any younger than 17 would not be good, because of the subject matter of the poems. But it’s a great acting exercise, a great way to exercise the imagination of young actors. They are also great to teach what it means by “high stakes”. People, in general, don’t want to live in a state of “high stakes” all the time, and actors are no different. There isn’t a poem in the collection where the stakes are not sky-high.

I mean, here it is 25 years later, and I still remember “I thirsted so for love, I hungered so for life!”

Here is another poem from Spoon River Anthology:

Elsa Wertman

I was a peasant girl from Germany,
Blue-eyed, rosy, happy and strong.
And the first place I worked was at Thomas Greene’s.
On a summer’s day when she was away
He stole into the kitchen and took me
Right in his arms and kissed me on my throat,
I turning my head. Then neither of us
Seemed to know what happened.
And I cried for what would become of me.
And cried and cried as my secret began to show.
One day Mrs. Greene said she understood,
And would make no trouble for me,
And, being childless, would adopt it.
(He had given her a farm to be still. )
So she hid in the house and sent out rumors,
As if it were going to happen to her.
And all went well and the child was born — They were so kind to me.
Later I married Gus Wertman, and years passed.
But — at political rallies when sitters-by thought I was crying
At the eloquence of Hamilton Greene —
That was not it.
No! I wanted to say:
That’s my son!
That’s my son!

I will close out with this moment in Radu Jude’s masterful 2021 film Bad Luck Banging or Loony Porn – a vicious lamooning polemic – filmed at the height of the pandemic, and a perfect distillation of every single stupid thing happening in our current world. So there’s this. “Timely.”

QUOTES:

Edgar Lee Masters’ full epitaph:

Good friends, let’s to the fields …
After a little walk, and by your pardon,
I think I’ll sleep. There is no sweeter thing,
Nor fate more blessed than to sleep.

I am a dream out of a blessed sleep –
Let’s walk and hear the lark.

Herbert K. Russell, Concise Dictionary of American Literary Biography on Spoon River Anthology:

The volume became an international popular and critical success and introduced with a flourish what has since come to be known as the Chicago Renaissance.

The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry:

If one could write true epitaphs, instead of conventional ones, a whole community might appear as it actually was rather than as it seemed to be. These ideas animated Masters’s Spoon River Anthology, his one memorable book in a lifetime of writing.

Ernest Earnest, Western Humanities Review:

It is safe to say that no other volume of poetry except The Waste Land (1922) made such an impact during the first quarter of [the 20th] century.

Edgar Lee Masters, American Mercury:

The names I drew from both the Spoon river and the Sangamon river neighborhoods, combining first names here with surnames there, and taking some also from the constitutions and State papers of Illinois. Only in a few instances, such as those of Chase Henry, William H. Herndon and Anne Rutledge and two or three others, did I use anyone’s name as a whole.

Herbert K. Russell, Concise Dictionary of American Literary Biography on Spoon River Anthology:

[Masters was] the victim of the success of his one enduring achievement, Spoon River Anthology; no matter what he published after it, he could never produce a rival to it, and so each ensuing volume represented a decline. Spoon River Anthology made him famous, but it also contributed to some of the sadness in his life, and it is (to borrow from it) his ‘true epitaph, more lasting than stone.’

Stanley Edgar Hyman, The Critic’s Credentials: Essays and Reviews:

[Spoon River Anthology was a] succes de scandale-—it was the sex-shocker, the Peyton Place of its day. Knowing that childbirth would kill his wife, Henry Barker impregnated her out of hatred. The only feeling Benjamin Pantier inspired in his wife was sexual disgust. Old Henry Bennett died of overexertion in the bed of his young wife.

The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry:

Masters emphasized later that the book was organized in terms of Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven (on Earth), and it began with the ne’er-do-wells, moved on to mixed, purgatorial types, and concluded with those who had achieved some illumination. The book’s success came in part from the inspired simplicity of its aim. The types of people were familiar; their sly misdoings were those that everyone could recognize their neighbors to be guilty of. The style was not ambitious, but often hit home. Its prosiness allowed for unexpectedly terse phrases inlaid among the slack ones. The solemn reverberations of death mixed with the flamboyant chatter of life.

Carl Van Doren, Contemporary American Novelists:

It was the scandal and not the poetry of Spoon River … which particularly spread its fame.

Amy Lowell, Tendencies in Modern American Poetry:

One wonders, if life in our little Western cities is as bad as this, why everyone does not commit suicide.

Ezra Pound, The Egoist:

At last. At last America has discovered a poet. At last the American West has produced a poet strong enough to weather the climate, capable of dealing with life directly, without circumlocution, without resonant meaningless phrases.

Carl Sandburg in the Little Review:

Once in a while a man comes along who writes a book that has his own heart-beats in it. The people whose faces look out from the pages of the book are the people of life itself, each trait of them as plain or as mysterious as in the old home valley where the writer came from. Such a writer and book are realized here.

The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry:

Many American poets have sought to embrace all of America. What attracts them is perhaps that the country is so large, sprawling, and hard to handle. This grandiose sensuality goes back to Walt Whitman, who wrote, “I embrace multitudes.” In the twentieth century, America’s chief lovers included William Carlos Williams and Hart Crane. For both, America seemed a center of intense, multifarious feelings. They differ from regionalists, such as Edgar Lee Masters and Robert Frost, whose relations even to their regions were more ambiguous.

Herbert K. Russell, on Lincoln: The Man:

Masters, a Jeffersonian Democrat, was so unfair to his Republican subject that Lincoln: The Man drew some of the most hostile criticism ever leveled at an American biography.

Fred Lewis Pattee, The New American Literature: 1890-1930:

The value of the Spoon River volume lies in its originality of design, its uniqueness, its effect upon its times. Its colossal success started a choir of young poets. Whether we condemn or praise, we must accept it as a major episode in the history of the poetic movement in the second decade of the new century.

Louis Untermeyer, American Poetry since 1900:

With Spoon River Anthology, Masters arrived—and left.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

“A ‘smartcracker’ they called me, and that makes me sick and unhappy.” — Dorothy Parker

“Oh, good Lord, what’s the matter with women, anyway?”
“Please don’t call me ‘women,'” she said.
“I’m sorry, darling,” he said. “I didn’t mean to use bad words.”
— Dorothy Parker, “Dusk Before Fireworks”

It’s her birthday today.

I cannot tell you how many times, in my life as a writer, I have thought of her words: “I hate writing. I love having written.” Nobody said it better. I feel this every day of my life.

Dorothy Parker, near the end of her life, speaking of the Algonquin Round Table:

These were no giants. Think who was writing in those days — Lardner, Fitzgerald, Faulkner and Hemingway. Those were the real giants. The Round Table was just a lot of people telling jokes and telling each other how good they were. Just a bunch of loudmouths showing off, saving their gags for days, waiting for a chance to spring them. It was not legendary. I don’t mean that — but it wasn’t all that good. There was no truth in anything they said. It was the terrible day of the wisecrack, so there didn’t have to be any truth.

Dorothy Parker was famous for her wit, sharp tongue, and incisive (sometimes brutal) opinions. She spoke and wrote the way her her mind worked: fast, caustic, competitive, and lethal. There are so many anecdotes about her, and who knows if they are all true, but I prefer to believe they are true. Parker could crush an opponent using only language. It may not be a lovable quality, but it is certainly a theatrical and literary quality.

“Gertrude Stein did us the most harm when she said, ‘You’re all a lost generation.’ That got around to certain people and we all said, Whee! We’re lost. Perhaps it suddenly brought to us the sense of change. Or irresponsibility. But don’t forget that, although the people in the twenties seemed like flops, they weren’t. Fitzgerald, the rest of them, reckless as they were, drinkers as they were, they worked damn hard and all the time.” – Dorothy Parker

There is a sadness in Parker’s later interviews, an awareness that she was perhaps pigeon-holed, or she had pigeon-holed herself. Here she is, during an interview with The Paris Review in 1956:

Like everybody was then, I was following in the exquisite footsteps of Miss Millay, unhappily in my own horrible sneakers. My verses are no damn good. Let’s face it, honey, my verse is terribly dated – as anything once fashionable is dreadful now. I gave it up, knowing it wasn’t getting any better, but nobody seemed to notice my magnificent gesture.

Bitter, but making bitterness funny (“magnificent gesture”). A survival skill.

Another quote from the same interview:

I don’t want to be classed as a humorist. It makes me feel guilty. I’ve never read a good tough quotable female humorist, and I never was one myself…There’s a hell of a distance between wisecracking and wit. Wit has truth in it; wisecracking is simply calisthenics with words.

She addresses her central struggle in a short piece called “I Don’t Feel Funny”, written in the annus horribilis of 1939.

I don’t think these are funny times, and I don’t think Franco is funny. I don’t think I can fight fascism by being comical, nor do I think that anybody else can… I know many silly people, because I have known them for years, and I cannot keep my face shut when they talk peculiar idiocy; when they say everybody should keep very quiet and do nothing about anything, or when they shake their heads and sigh that unions are all rackets, or when they murmur, “Oh, well, I’m content to stay in my ivory tower”– oh God, oh God, that dreary ivory tower, the only window of which looks out on the fascist side.

Her short stories are devastating, even when they are funny (and sometimes they are not funny at all): miniature portraits of loneliness and urban life. Single girls trying to survive, living in rooming houses, sometimes succumbing to the dark side, the Edward-Hopper-ian loneliness of the insomniacs, the poor. She’s excellent on the interrelationships of men and women, how we try to communicate, how we fail, how we come to things with different expectations. (Her story “The Sexes,” told only in dialogue – with no narration, no exposition, is quite brilliant.) I love “Arrangement in Black and White,” (a kind of “Radical Chic” story for the 1920s set), “Big Blonde” (probably her most famous short story), “Song of the Shirt, 1941” “Here We Are”. I love “The Banquet of Crow.” Some of her stories are first-person monologues, funny, frantic, stream-of-consciousness (the one about a woman waiting for a man to telephone comes to mind). And throughout are these zingers of lines – lines that blare from the middle of the page with a kind of clarity, announcing the VOICE behind it. A random sampling:

“The young woman was of those unfortunates who remember every word.”
“her bearing had always that calm that only the correctly attired may enjoy”
“her words fell like snow when there is no wind.”
“The men wore the garb they could by now easily call Black Tie. (The steps in social ascent may be gauged by the terms employed to describe a man’s informal evening dress: the progression goes Tuxedo, Tux, dinner jacket, Black Tie.”

“Nobody can write such ironic things unless he has a deep sense of injustice – injustice to those members of the race who are the victims of the stupid, the pretentious and the hypocritical.” – Franklin P. Adams on Dorothy Parker’s short stories

Other sequences I love:

From “The Little Hours”:

Well. This way lies galloping melancholia. Maybe it’s because this is the zero hour. This is the time the swooning soul hangs pendant and vertiginous between the new day and the old, nor dates confront the one and summon back the other. This is the time when all things, known and hidden, are iron to weight the spirit; when all ways, traveled or virgin, fall away from the stumbling feet, when all before the straining eyes to black. Blackness now, everywhere is blackness. This is the time of abomination, the dreadful hour of the victorious dark. For it is always darkest – Was it not that lovable old cynic, La Rouchefoucauld, who said it is always darkest before the deluge?

From “Sentiment”:

I wonder why it’s wrong to be sentimental. People are so contemptuous of feeling. ‘You wouldn’t catch me sitting alone and mooning,’ they say. “Moon” is what they say when they mean remember, and they are so proud of not remembering. It’s strange, how they pride themselves upon their lacks. ‘I never take anything seriously,’ they say. ‘I simply couldn’t imagine,’ they say, ‘letting myself care so much that I could be hurt.’ They say, ‘No one person could be that important to me.’ And why, why do they think they’re right?

Also from “Sentiment”:

“Go out and see your friends and have a good time,” they say. “Don’t sit alone and dramatize yourself.” Dramatize yourself! If it be drama to feel a steady – no, a ceaseless rain beating upon my heart, then I do dramatize myself. The shallow people, the little people, how can they know what suffering is, how could their thick hearts be torn? Don’t they know, the empty fools, that I could not see again the friends we saw together, could not go back to the places where he and I have been? For he’s gone, and it’s ended. It’s ended, it’s ended. And when it ends, only those places where you have known sorrow are kindly to you. If you revisit the scenes of your happiness, your heart must burst of its agony. And that’s sentimental, I suppose.

People who only think of her as a wisecracker haven’t read enough of her work.

“Ah, satire. That’s another matter. They’re the big boys. If I’d been called a satirist, there’d be no living with me. But by satirist I mean those boys in the other centuries. The people we call satirists now are those who make cracks at topical topics and consider themselves satirists – creatures like George S. Kaufman and such who don’t even know what satire is. Lord knows, a writer should show his times, but not show them in wisecracks. Their stuff is not satire; it’s as dull as yesterday’s newspaper. Successful satire has got to be pretty good the day after tomorrow.” – Dorothy Parker

The opening paragraph of “The Banquet of Crow”:

It was a crazy year, a year when things that should have run on schedule went all which ways. It was a year when snow fell thick and lasting in April, and young ladies clad in shorts were photographed for the tabloids sunbathing in Central Park in January. It was a year when, in the greatest prosperity of the richest nation, you could not walk five city blocks without being besought by beggars; when expensively dressed women loud and lurching in public places were no uncommon sight; when drugstore counters were stacked with tablets to make you tranquil and other tablets to set you leaping. It was a year when wives whose position was only an inch or two below that of the saints – arbiters of etiquette, venerated hostesses, architects of memorable menus – suddenly caught up a travelling bag and a jewel case and flew off to Mexico with ambiguous young men allied with the arts; when husbands who had come home every evening not only at the same hour but at the same minute of the same hour came home one evening more, spoke a few words, and then went out their doors and did not come in by them again.

She says in the Paris Review interview:

Mailer’s The Naked and the Dead is a great book. And I thought William Styron’s Lie Down in Darkness an extraordinary thing. The start of it took your heart and flung it over there. He writes like a god. But for most of my reading I go back to the old ones – for comfort. As you get older you go much farther back. I read Vanity Fair about a dozen times a year. I was a woman of eleven when I first read it – the thrill of that line “George Osborne lay dead with a bullet through his heart.” Sometimes I read, as an elegant friend of mine calls them, “who-did-its”. I love Sherlock Holmes. My life is so untidy and he’s so neat. But as for living novelists, I suppose E.M. Forster is the best, not knowing that that is, but at least he’s a semifinalist, wouldn’t you think?

She said once that humor needed “a disciplined eye and a wild mind”. To me, that perfectly describes her verses, which are tight as a drum, the rhyme schemes and rhythms almost a throwback to Longfellow, who writes rhymes so perfect, that they must be read out loud for the sheer joy of them. You can also hear the influence of Edna St. Vincent Millay, particularly in the love lyrics, but Parker’s verses are bitter, angry, funny. There’s so much good stuff to discover in her poetry, not just the usual suspects (the one about suicide is probably her most famous). Also, the TITLES of her poems are unexpected, often driving the point home once you finish reading the poem. A sampling:

A Very Short Song
Once, when I was young and true,
Someone left me sad-
Broke my brittle heart in two;
And that is very bad.

Love is for unlucky folk,
Love is but a curse.
Once there was a heart I broke;
And that, I think, is worse.

Anecdote
So silent I when Love was by
He yawned, and turned away;
But Sorrow clings to my apron-strings,
I have so much to say.

Unfortunate Coincidence
By the time you swear you’re his,
Shivering and sighing,
And he vows his passion is
Infinite, undying –
Lady, make a note of this:
One of you is lying.

Comment
Oh, life is a glorious cycle of song,
A medley of extemporanea;
And love is a thing that can never go wrong;
And I am Marie of Roumania.

Men
They hail you as their morning star
Because you are the way you are.
If you return the sentiment,
They’ll try to make you different;
And once they have you, safe and sound,
They want to change you all around.
Your moods and ways they put a curse on;
They’d make of you another person.
They cannot let you go your gait;
They influence and educate.
They’d alter all that they admired.
They make me sick, they make me tired.

Bric-a-Brac
Little things that no one needs —
Little things to joke about —
Little landscapes, done in beads.
Little morals, woven out,
Little wreaths of gilded grass,
Little brigs of whittled oak
Bottled painfully in glass;
These are made by lonely folk.

Lonely folk have lines of days
Long and faltering and thin;
Therefore — little wax bouquets,
Prayers cut upon a pin,
Little maps of pinkish lands,
Little charts of curly seas,
Little plats of linen strands,
Little verses, such as these.

Harriet Beecher Stowe
The pure and worthy Mrs. Stowe
Is one we all are proud to know
As mother, wife, and authoress-
Thank God, I am content with less!

Fulfillment
For this my mother wrapped me warm,
And called me home against the storm,
And coaxed my infant nights to quiet,
And gave me roughage in my diet,
And tucked me in my bed at eight,
And clipped my hair, and marked my weight,
And watched me as I sat and stood:
That I might grow to womanhood
To hear a whistle and drop my wits
And break my heart to clattering bits.

Two-Volume Novel
The sun’s gone dim, and
The moon’s turned black;
For I loved him, and
He didn’t love back.

The Lady’s Reward
Lady, lady, never start
Conversation toward your heart;
Keep your pretty words serene;
Never murmur what you mean.
Show yourself, by word and look,
Swift and shallow as a brook.
Be as cool and quick to go
As a drop of April snow;
Be as delicate and gay
As a cherry flower in May.
Lady, lady, never speak
Of the tears that burn your cheek-
She will never win him, whose
Words had shown she feared to lose.
Be you wise and never sad,
You will get your lovely lad.
Never serious be, nor true,
And your wish will come to you-
And if that makes you happy, kid,
You’ll be the first it ever did.

And finally:

Oscar Wilde

If, with the literate, I am
Impelled to try an epigram,
I never seek to take the credit;
We all assume that Oscar said it.

“I hate almost all rich people, but I think I’d be darling at it.” – Dorothy Parker

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , , , | 18 Comments

“The thing I really wanna say is—and really, really mean is that real things last. Any way you look at it. Real things last.” — Dale Hawkins

Dale Hawkins, 1957, playing on the Louisiana Hayride radio show (just a year after Elvis completed his world-shaking run on the program)

It’s his birthday today. Time moved really fast in the mid-50s rock-rockabilly world. Elvis exploded and made everyone irrelevant almost overnight. He turned everyone into wannabes, generating a million copycats, some of which rode his coattails to some success (at the very least financially). But it was one of those events that EXPLODED overnight and then deflated almost as quickly. It almost never happens that way. Buddy Holly was on a bill with Elvis in 1955, and his style almost immediately veered away from country into Elvis-land, a sharp right-angle – he was like “oh wait, I need to be doing THIS.” This happened across the board. For perspective: Elvis was an unknown less than a year before. He recorded “That’s All Right’ in July 1954. It made local waves. His Louisiana Hayride appearances launched him regionally. This is still 1954, though – 1955 he started his tear through the Southwest and Southeast. This is where all these future legends like Holly encountered him. The culture veered Elvis’ way, unstoppably. Buddy Holly “hit” in 1957, which doesn’t sound like it’s a long gap – 1955 to 1957 – but in the fast-moving 1950s rockabilly world it was an eternity. By 1957, Elvis was a movie star. Wild. His style almost immediately moved into what we now would probably just call “pop” – but he also put out a Christmas album, a gospel album, he did whatever the hell he wanted to do, and don’t let anyone tell you different. But the point is: He couldn’t be considered pure rockabilly. He never was. But he was a comet with a long long tail.

The field became extremely crowded almost overnight. The gold rush. Sun Records became a single-artist operation, causing tension with other artists like Billy Lee Riley, Johnny Cash, etc. Jerry Lee Lewis was the new shining star but he flamed out almost immediately with the scandal of his marriage. Sun Records didn’t have a crowded roster anymore. Charlie Rich came and went. It was no longer the Mecca.

“I was raised by my grandparents in Louisiana. That led, I think, to a lot of the types of sounds that I do music wise because I was in the melting pot of good music. In the saloons, the front would be where the white people were, and if you swing the door, you’d hear Hank Williams sing “Lovesick Blues.” And then on the other side, you’d hear Elmore James “Dust My Broom,” or, you know, some good classic blues. Plus the churches. I mean, people don’t realize that all of the churches with the exception of the Catholic and Episcopal sang the same hymns but sang it with different feeling.” — Dale Hawkins, 2008 interview

Dale Hawkins is a tail-end-of-the-comet figure, but that doesn’t mean he was derivative. He wasn’t a pale imitation of anybody. He grew up in a musical family. He loved blues music. He was a kid but he was smart. Elvis was the game-changer. Dale positioned himself adjacent to the Louisiana Hayride, parking cars in the Hayride lot. That’s as close as he could get at first. He got to know some of the Hayride musicians (D.J. Fontana primarily, who then got sucked into the Elvis Monsoon). He got the attention of Stan Lewis at Chess, and went into the studio to record a demo, the song by which Dale Hawkins is primarily known to this day: “Susie Q.” The song was written as an instrumental by a kid named … James Burton (speaking of which, and speaking of the Louisiana Hayride to Elvis Pipeline). (Burton wouldn’t hook up with Elvis, though, until the 70s.)

The guitar part on “Susie Q” is fucking legendary. Keep in mind: James Burton was just seventeen years old when he came up with this lick. Insane.

But the whole thing is legendary. The cowbell in the opening. There’s something nasty about all of it. It’s dirrrrrty. Dirtier than a lot of the “rockabilly” stuff going on at the time, geared towards the sock hop crowd. Genres are imprecise. This isn’t “rockabilly” although history tries to loop him into it. Dale Hawkins was a harbinger of the future. Without Dale Hawkins, there’d be no Creedence Clearwater Revival. The Rolling Stones were CLEARLY inspired by Dale Hawkins, Keith Richards for SURE (so … inspired by the song, but mostly inspired by that guitar). It’s hard to call anything the first – you have to be very careful with it – but Hawkins’ sound, made just as the first Elvis Explosion was dissipating (before going even further and longer – it was all very unpredictable) – and just as the Rockabilly Revolution spun out into space losing speed … pushed its way outside the margins, basically carving out a teeny bit of real estate which would eventually be called “swamp rock”, the dirty guitar-heavy sound of the 70s.

When this happens … when something new comes along – or “new” – it’s sometimes viewed as an anomaly, or a one-off, or a fluke. People LOVE labels, and they love it when things are NEAT. Dale Hawkins was not neat. His moment in the sun was brief and his one big hit was “Susie Q” (although his discography rewards the curious and patient. There’s a lot of great stuff there. Hawkins attracted great musicians from the jump, people who would go on to be legends – like Burton – or stellar studio musicians who became part of the Wrecking Crew. And so his tracks show a really high level of musicianship (unlike, it must be said, a lot of the other rockabilly stuff). Granted, for rockabilly you don’t NEED amazing musicianship, and in some cases high technical skill could be a detriment. But Hawkins was different.

“Susie Q” is a nothing of a song without that instrumentation. The lyrics are about a girl named Susie Q with a distinctive walk. It’s Roy Orbison’s “Pretty Woman”. That’s it. But the way it SOUNDS is … I mean, it sounds like SEX is what it sounds like. Sex in a moldy wet bayou shack, if I’m being honest. The song is unimaginable without James Burton’s guitar part. (Feel so fortunate I went and saw James Burton back in 2013.)


Ricky Nelson and James Burton

“Susie Q” did “chart”, and fairly well, although nothing really “stuck”, and it didn’t generate momentum – at least not for Hawkins personally. This is wild since the song is now seen as one of the most crucial and influential tracks of the 1950s. It happens that way sometimes. I think its newness and obvious dirtiness – its spare nasty sound – a cowbell, a guitar, a bass, and drums – it’s a grown-up sound, not a sock-hop sound – was threatening to the label, so they didn’t really push it. Hawkins kept recording though. He hosted a TV show for a while. He died in 2010, so he rode the nostalgia waves, and put out a couple of albums late in the game which got a lot of attention and critical chatter. He seemed to enjoy this late success.

Here’s a 1958 television performance, and this whole setup is kind of funny because … as I mentioned before, Dale Hawkins was no soda-shop good boy. It’s 1958, though: the Elvis wave was almost completely over. He was about to enter the Army. He had made 4 movies. Rockabilly burned out. “The Day the Music Died” was coming. So the proverbial “they” had him perform in an ice cream parlor set, your basic white-bread teenage set – a world he himself never belonged to. His songs don’t belong there either.

And finally, the man of the hour playing the song that inspired generations of guitarists, 50, 60 years of them.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Music, On This Day | Tagged , | 8 Comments

“If you’re creating anything at all, it’s really dangerous to care about what people think.” — Kristen Wiig

Today is the birthday of one of the greatest actors working today.

I can’t seem to stop mentioning Kristen Wiig in my writing. I mention her even if she isn’t the main subject. She’s my favorite. I am in awe of what she can do. She’s the closest we have to the great character-actresses-as-leading-ladies of the 1970s. There’s a reason she cast Jill Clayburgh as her own mother in Bridesmaids. Wiig is the artistic/creative daughter of Jill Clayburgh. With a little Madeline Kahn and Cloris Leachman in the mix, forming her own witches’ brew of genius.

So here’s an archive of the pieces where she comes up, either at the center, or peripherally:

Let’s talk about back-ting. Scenes where actors convey everything with their backs. A very niche obsession but I wrote about it for Film Comment. Wiig has a HELL of a back-ting moment in Hateship Loveship, a movie I highly recommend. Incidentally, along with the back-ting moment in Hateship Loveship, she also has a HELL of a “mirror moment” – which I didn’t mention in my big “mirror piece” for Oscilloscope, but maybe I should do a part 2, because I just scratched the surface with the topic.


Hateship Loveship (2014)

I reviewed Hateship Loveship for Ebert and the film was such a pleasant discovery. So many people still haven’t seen it. Check it out!

I also mentioned her prominently in another Film Comment piece, about women who “came up” in comedy, either improv or sketch comedy, who are also phenomenal dramatic actresses, some of the best, really, especially in terms of depth of character development. People with this background go deeper than most. And while Bridesmaids is obviously hilarious, Wiig is – at the same time – giving a very deep performance showing loneliness, disappointment, heartbreak, panic. That character is a fuck-up.

This very small moment:

That whole SCENE, really … I have lived it. I have been her. Repeatedly. Not so much anymore, but when I was at the stage in my life when everyone was getting married. I flushed with recognition during that scene. I wish people understood that what she does in that scene – create a panic attack/hot flash on camera, in real time, her wildly sad eyes gleaming out of her wildly laughing face … this is a Madeline Kahn level brilliance, and since I consider Madeline Kahn to be one of the few sui generis geniuses of the acting art, you know I mean it. The structure of the scene is there – Wiig knows what the moment requires – and when the moment arrives, she just jumps off the cliff into the midst of it, letting her talent and instinct do the rest. It’s SUCH a sad moment but it is simultaneously so funny. Very very few people can do that.

So she can do that and then she can do Garth and Kat.

Or the pure LUNACY of “Liza Minnelli tries to turn off a lamp”.

… and on and on and on.

Back to what I said about Bridesmaids, because this is part of Wiig’s gift, and also part of what I wrote about in that “female comedians” piece. Young actresses often want to be liked. Their entire early career is about trading on their likability. Being adorable ingenues, with the movies totally on their side. The women I love don’t care about that in the slightest, and Wiig is such a good example. Bridesmaid was a monster-hit comedy but notice how BADLY her character behaves – to everyone – how BADLY she fucks up – and yes, it’s funny – but she is also in the process of torching her own life to the ground, due to her own misery. This is not an isolated example in Wiig’s work. I must mention Skeleton Twins, because her character is next level “fucking up”. (I wrote about Skeleton Twins here.) Look at what the character does. Talk about torching her own life. She’s with this genuinely nice husband (Luke Wilson) and she cheats on him left and right, hooking up in bathrooms with strangers at the drop of a hat. She can’t stop herself. It’s compulsive. She pretends she’s off the pill because her husband is under the delusion that they both want a baby, and she can’t just come out and say, “I can’t be a mother, I don’t want to be a mother.” Lies upon lies upon lies. Horrible lies. Lies you can’t walk back. And yet … you understand her. At least I do. She’s totally fucked up. It’s amazing she’s still alive. Look at her mother. Look at her twin brother (Bill Hader). Neither of them can just settle down and accept stability, even happiness. They both walk around in a state of suicidal ideation. At the end, you’re not even sure if they’ve come out on the other side. They are all each other has. Her relationship with her husband was a way for her to pretend that she could be normal and happy, and also safe from her worst impulses. She lied to herself AND her husband. The marriage hasn’t changed her, it has just made her more secretive and devious. And so she “acted out” and ruined everything.

Skeleton Twins was marketed incorrectly and I wish these idiots would learn that they are shooting themselves – and their movie – in the foot. Skeleton Twins is not a wacky comedy starring two SNL alums. There are funny scenes – two, really – but other than that, it is a serious family drama. And she is brilliant in it. When she screams by herself in the car, screams and weeps, because she fucked up again and she can’t stop fucking up … we’re not at ALL in a comedic realm. Many people find characters who make the right choices redemptive. They say things like “life-affirming.” I am not suggesting those people are lying or shallow or wrong. But when they start assuming that that’s the ONLY way a character can be “redemptive”, that any character who does unforgivable things is a “bad example” and needs to be shown to be a “bad example”, and the character should be judged in the same way you judge a person in your friend circle … well, no. I’m gonna fight you on that. My opinion is just as valid as yours and not only do I find fucked-up characters redemptive – I reject the whole concept of “redemptive” as the be-all and end-all of art. SOME art is “redemptive” but it’s not a REQUIREMENT. Art has many purposes other than making people feel hopeful. We all need to “feel seen” and I “feel seen” by the character in Bridesmaids and the character in Skeleton Twins. I have torched my life. I have behaved badly. I have acted out. I have made it my business to make happy people feel guilty about their happiness. I don’t do this anymore, I grew out of it, but I have done that, during those very bad years. I am not proud of it and I will not defend it but to ADMIT that so-called “good” people can behave really really badly is not somehow an “endorsement” of bad behavior. ENOUGH with whether or not something “endorses” something else. Look out when political language like “endorsement” seeps down into emotional personal life. It’s a sign of tyranny and fascism. Look it up. So no: bad behavior shown onscreen does not “endorse” said behavior, but it DOES admit the truths and complexity of the human condition. And Wiig is all about that.

And finally, I reviewed Barb and Star Go to Vista del Mar. It was so much fun writing that review (and seeing the movie). SILLINESS. Pure SILLINESS. Not a serious moment in it. Pure escape. A REFRESHING TONIC.

I haven’t even mentioned Welcome to Me. What an uncompromising film. It doesn’t cop out. I couldn’t believe it when I saw it. I kept waiting for the cop-out, the redemption. Nope. (Same thing with Charlize Theron in her best performance in Young Adult.) I need to write about both of those films. They excite me.

I’m happy she’s out there. Any time she shows up in something, you know it’s gonna be good.

Posted in Actors, Movies, On This Day, Television | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

“Everyone thinks they know Frankenstein.” — Oscar Isaac

A lovely interview with both Oscar Isaac and Jacob Elordi about Frankenstein. I love them both. Also, finally people can TALK about this thing. It’s great to watch the film move into this next phase!

Posted in Actors, Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment