Re-Reading The Rape of Nanking

I made the mistake of re-reading The Rape of Nanking on the train home today.

Isn’t one time reading that book of horrors enough? I mean, I can’t get the images out of my mind from the first time reading Iris Chang’s book.

It’s one of the most depressing brutal awful books I have ever read. Also one of the most important.

The descriptions of some of the rapes are … I wince, personally, when I read that book. It all goes beyond words. You read, and you feel yourself going cold. You try not to identify, but you cannot help it. You cannot help trying to imagine yourself in that situation, what it would be like, what they went through. But the stories – you just can’t believe it, even though you know they happened – the little girls hemorrhaging, and women tied to chairs, their genitals torn apart, the Japanese soldiers cutting open the vaginas of small girls so they could rape them – the horror that the family members went through.

And the men of Nanking went through their own horror as well. Not to mention being murdered, and tortured, and used for bayonet practice, and having to dig their own mass graves, and being buried alive … they also were forced to watch Japanese soldiers rape their baby daughters, their grandmothers, their wives, whatever … I mean, the mind just blanks out trying to contemplate it.

The whole thing is just … beyond words. It leaves me speechless with horror. Man’s inhumanity to man. Make that man’s GLEEFUL inhumanity to man. The faces of laughing soldiers in the background, the pictures of naked raped women, with a leering soldier grinning at the camera …

Iris Chang haunts me now. And I guess I felt like – ever since her suicide a month or so ago – that I owed it to her to read her book again. To not close my eyes, turn away. No. She didn’t. She was courageous enough to LOOK. To try to LIVE with those images. To tell the story of the people of Nanking. To shine a spotlight on this “forgotten holocaust”.

But the book leaves me with this blank awful SPACE in my brain.

The contemplation of evil. Trying to comprehend evil. The book is a catalog of monstrosity. Evil, violence, torture, brutality …

I was on the train, reading it, reading about John Rabe (the Nazi who really is the hero of the story – they still call him “the Buddha of Nanking” in China for all that he did to stop the raping and killing). Rabe came back to Germany and basically was ostracized and fired and punished because of his role in protecting the Chinese (and going against Germany’s ally at the time – Japan). Rabe’s diary entries become a litany of poverty, feelings of betrayal, and illness. And apparently, word of Rabe’s difficulties reached the people of Nanking, a couple of years after WWII ended – and these people, ravaged as they were by war and death, took up collections of money, and food – and sent them all to John Rabe in Germany. To help him in his time of need. Poverty-struck people from China, all the way across the world, remembering the man who strode through the corpse-strewn streets of Nanking, pulling Japanese soldiers off of crying Chinese girls and women, and dragging the women to safety. The people of Nanking remembered. Sent him bags of rice, as much money as they could send …

I’ve read the book before, as I’ve said. But the horror of the photos and the descriptions of the rapes pretty much blotted out all else, in my time reading it before. This time, though, on the train – what struck me, like an arrow through my heart, was the people of Nanking sending John Rabe bags of rice 10 years after the war ended. I just …

It’s the blinding light of goodness, in the middle of such death … it kills me. It is like an arrow through the heart. Such goodness, after experiencing what they experienced, is difficult to contemplate, difficult to understand. It cannot be explained. It just IS.

John Rabe died forgotten by the world at large. But not to the people of Nanking. Iris Chang said that people still talk of him in Nanking to this day. People remember. And now, because of Iris Chang’s powerful powerful book, he will always be remembered.

But still.

The goodness … sending him bags of rice … which pretty much was all that these people had … Thinking about that is just like an arrow through my heart.

I put my scarf over my eyes, as we sped past New Rochelle, and cried my eyes out until the train pulled into Penn Station.

I don’t even know what part of the above tale I was crying about. Guess I was just crying about the whole damn thing, really. A catharsis. Necessary after reading, again, about such horror. I cried, silently, and REALLY HARD, for 35 minutes straight. I suppose I was shedding some tears for poor Iris Chang, too. Poor woman. She must have walked around in psychic agony … too great to bear.

It’s a brutal book. Brutal. I don’t think I will subject myself to it again – but I certainly will never forget it.

This entry was posted in Books and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Re-Reading The Rape of Nanking

  1. David Foster says:

    There were a couple of letters in the paper recently asserting that not only is the Iraq war about oil, WWII was *also* about oil…because Pearl Harbor was triggered by the US oil embargo against Japan. There was no mention, of course, of the Japanese imperial expansion–including the Rape of Nanking–that led to the imposition of the oil embargo in the first place.

  2. MikeR says:

    It does make you wonder about the future of the human race when you consider that people have so often throughout history, when they perceived themselves to have a free hand, gleefully done immense evil.

    The same sorts of horrors are ongoing in Africa at this very minute. Once again, nobody in power seems to have the wisdom or the courage to try to stop it.

  3. DBW says:

    Damn, Sheila. Iris Chang and Robert Conquest. I see you are really in the Christmas spirit. With comforting reading like that, I know you don’t need another bubonic plague pick-me-up e-mail.

    Like you, I felt a need to go back and reread The Rape of Nanking after Iris Chang’s suicide. It is a shattering book. It is the kind of book you wish more people would read, but you can’t really bring yourself to recommend it to your loved ones. It is the kind of book that has me always refer to her as Iris–as if I knew her personally.

  4. Mr. Lion says:

    A rather cold proof of the concept that all that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

  5. Atlas Shrugged

    And what I meant in that earlier post was that maybe there is an upside to all this, that maybe we’ll see more of the goodness that pierces the heart like an arrow, see more of what makes mankind in any way redeemable, instead of more of our own evil…

  6. Ken Hall says:

    William Golding once wrote in an essay (“Fable,” printed in his collection The Hot Gates):

    “I must say that anyone who passed through those years [of World War II] without understanding that man produces evil as a bee produces honey, must have been blind or wrong in the head.”

    Of course, it’s too easy to take that statement as a point of departure to “all-sides-are-equally-culpable-ville”. All sides are equally fallen, not equally culpable. The real point is that the revolution in human nature will not be televised…because it ain’t happening. From Lamentations to Leningrad to Cambodia to Rwanda and Darfur, nothing has changed.

    That doesn’t excuse despair, either. “Will shall be the sterner, heart the bolder, spirit the greater as our strength lessens.”

  7. red says:

    DBW:

    I forgot about that pick-me-up email of yours. That’s pretty funny.

    “Cheer up! At least you don’t have the bubonic plague!”

    heh heh heh

  8. Mr. Bingley says:

    “All sides are equally fallen, not equally culpable.”

    well said, ken

Comments are closed.