Middlemarch Middle Of the Night

Had a pretty much sleepless night last night. I normally have no problems with descending into oblivion, but last night was terrible. I lay awake, eyes wide open, staring into the darkness, pretty much worrying myself into a nervous attack. I couldn’t stop the old brain. Took me a while to even admit that I was having a bout of insomnia, I lay there wide-awake and worrying for waaayyyy too long. Finally, I had had it.

I got up. Turned on the light. Poured a glass of water and started reading Middlemarch, curled up under a fleece blanket in my now diagonally-placed chair. I read until 5 o’clock this morning. And then finally, I felt like sleeping. Put the book down, slept a couple of hours.

I had to have read 250 pages of Middlemarch last night, although I didn’t count. I finished the second-to-last part (called “Two Temptations”), and now I am in the final part of the book, entitled “Sunrise and Sunset”.

In a weird way, it was the worst thing to read during a sleepless night, because as the book races towards its conclusion, things keep getting worse and worse. George Eliot describes things so exquisitely well that it is impossible to not find examples in your own life and reflect upon your own regrets, the mistakes you have made, the bleaker moments of existence that we all have in our past.

Mr. Balustrode has emerged as a very important character (which I should have foreseen), and he, in a very short time, has become a ruined man.

Lydgate, too. The description of his marriage, and what it had become, is beyond awful. You feel for the guy. Rosamond … one of those people in the world who cannot believe that life is not set up to please her, to make her life easy. She has no sense of loyalty to her husband. None. She thinks nothing of going behind his back, she does not stand by him. As a matter of fact, as her contempt and disappointment grows, she begins to subvert him. IN the sneakiest ways. When she wrote to Lydgate’s uncle and asked him for money, I wanted to reach through the pages and smack the complacency off her face. I felt like I was Lydgate, and that she had betrayed me. How DARE you shame your husband like that? How dare you, you ignorant little bitch? She’s an enraging character. Circa 3 a.m., when I got to the part of her letter to Uncle Godwin, I had to put the book down for a second. I got too angry. It was making me nervous. And then comes Uncle Godwin’s letter to Lydgate, saying: “Don’t send your wife to do your business. It’s disgusting.” Meanwhile, Lydgate had no idea that Rosamond had gone behind his back … so even though I was thrilled that Rosamond would feel at least SOME humiliation for her appalling behavior, I felt – on the flipside – true dismay for Lydgate, because her secrecy and ignorance of how the world works (God, I want to smack her face, I’m serious) has ruined his chances to have a happy life. What a character. Rosamond is so alive that I felt her presence in my room. I wanted to speak to her, I wanted to make her realize how mistaken she is, how much she has missed the point, and how she has NO business being a wife. NONE. Her mind is completely undeveloped, and she has no sense that she ever needs to work on herself. No. Everything is justified, in her mind. She has no self-reflection. And in this, she completely abandons Lydgate (her husband) to his fate.

Another thing which struck me: The description of Lydgate’s mounting debt, and what it feels like to be in debt, how it creeps up on you, and how it suddenly takes over all of your thoughts after the debt reaches a certain point … Lydgate’s debt is described with such chilling accuracy that I found myself getting a little upset. Is there a better description of the emotional side of being in debt than in George Eliot’s book? It’s incredible. It is so accurate. Lydgate becomes more and more obsessed with this load of DEBT and how it poisons his entire life, and if he could just get RID of it – if he could just make it GO AWAY, then real life could begin. The desperation becomes so acute (and his wife is so supremely unsympathetic) that he does something so out of character that you ache for him. You ache for his loss of principles, you ache for the character you met at the beginning of the book. Because now, by the end, that character is no more. In his place, is a miserable desperate lonely man, pretty much under the control of the wife he once “loved” (ha – No, he didn’t.) – He thought she would be the comfort he could come home to, he thought she would be the soft pillow he could rest on at the end of a hard day. He did not recognize the faults in her character. He couldn’t see her essential selfishness and ignorance. She’s an awful person. I can’t stand her.

I am very sorry that Lydgate is being punished so completely, and his psyche so shattered – but he made a terrible choice in a wife, and that’s his fault. He was blinded by her beauty. He couldn’t imagine that that soft and pleasing exterior could hide such a sneaky hard disloyal person underneath. Her appearance fooled him. It is my hope that Rosamond gets hers in the end. And BADLY. (Please, don’t reveal what happens if you’ve read it. I will probably finish it tonight or tomorrow.)

So I found the entire “Two Temptations” section of the book really nerve-wracking (I could feel that events were spiralling out of control, and that things were going from bad to worse) – but I still couldn’t put it down. Also, and even more disturbing: I actually care about some of these characters now. I care about what happens to them.

One word: Caleb Garth is pretty much the only person in the book who acts according to his principles. I find that intensely moving. I love Caleb Garth.

This entry was posted in Books and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Middlemarch Middle Of the Night

  1. Anne says:

    Oh, but Lydgate’s bad choice makes him seem even more human, to me. His fault, but a common fault. In some ways an innocent fault.

  2. red says:

    Oh I totally agree. His humanness and fallibility makes him one of my favorite characters in the book. I am completely on his side. Yes, he believed that she would stick by him – there were no clues in her character that she wouldn’t.

  3. Laura (southernxyl) says:

    Okay, Sheila, I am going to disagree with you strongly about Rosamond.

    First of all, in her day a woman had the economic status that her father, and then her husband, provided for her. If I want things my husband can’t give me, I can go out find employment and get them myself. Rosamond didn’t have that option. Going in, Lydgate allowed her to expect certain things. Did he not take the house that he really couldn’t afford? Take it upon himself (as you noticed) to order the silverware and such? Remember the part about how it never crossed his mind, if he needed shirts, not to get the very best, and while he was at it, to order a dozen? It’s not like Rosamond is the materialist in the relationship. Lydgate wants things too. And he’s the one who has the power of changing their situation. His vision of what a physician should be is all very wonderful, but he does have an obligation to his wife. Would it kill him to sell drugs to his patients, like his colleagues do? And the bit about working his butt off for the fever hospital, taking on all that responsibility and taking time away from paying patients – FOR NO SALARY – and expecting Rosamond to tighten her belt. Remember, she can’t run out and get a job for pin money. Society wouldn’t let her. I have to say, in her place I would have been mad as hell.

  4. red says:

    Wow. Could not disagree with you more. I don’t disagree with your analysis of the plot, but I do disagree with you that “society” is the main problem here. Of course she didn’t have other options. So? The main problem is Rosamond’s undeveloped and soft character. A woman who always expects that things should be given to her. If anything, I would fault her parents a bit … for not helping her to develop into a more useful woman. As she is, she is completely useless. A fantasist, and a brat. She is sneaky, and also delusional. Her expectation- her unshakable belief – that Will Ladislaw will NATURALLY prefer her to Dorothea, that ANY man will prefer her (even if they can’t have her) has nothing to do with society. That is a character flaw. I see it in many women around me. These are the women whom you should not trust with your boyfriends or husbands. These women know NOTHING except that they deserve to always be the center of attention. And because they are most likely beautiful, more often than not that attention is given.

    I am now at the part in the book where Ladislaw bitch-slaps her into some sense of reality. When he says to her, “PREFER Mrs. Casaubon? I love her, I cannot live without her! She is my only choice!”

    The fact that Rosamond could not even imagine that a man would NOT prefer her is what makes her so intensely dislikable to me.

    Not that she’s an evil witch – she’s a human being with faults, failings, etc. like the rest of us. The first time I had compassion for her was in her moment of realization, her horrible moment when Ladislaw reads her the riot act, when she fully realizes her own delusion, and that everything she had imagined about herself, and also that everything she had built up as her escape hatch (that she could blithely go along in her life being unfaithful to her husband in her heart, by keeping Will Ladislaw on a leash around their marriage) – when all of that came crushing down, I truly felt for her. But before that? I couldn’t wait for her to get hers. Society schmociety.

    I have way more sympathy for her husband. He seems more like a victim of society to me than her. Her flaws are CHARACTER flaws. Maybe exacerbated by the society she was born into – but I see women around me who have those same flaws (vanity, selfishness, no sense of loyalty) – so it’s not just society that creates that.

  5. Laura says:

    Oh, I don’t deny that Rosamond is an immature twit. It’s funny that with all their offensive self-righteousness, the people who say that her parents spoiled their children unmercifully were absolutely right. But I really don’t think Lydgate did right by her. Her dalliance with Ladislaw was a kind of courtly love fantasy. It was foolish but not really harmful. I liked it that she made sure Dorothea knew there was nothing between them, and then that Will knew that Dorothea knew.

    I guess I’m irritated that Lydgate seems to think that HE has the vision and the standards and the goals and whatever else for the two of them, and it’s Rosamond’s job to just say “yes, dear” and deal with whatever he gives her. It was very immature of him to marry her FOR HER LOOKS and so I thought he kind of got what he deserved. He really needed somebody like Dorothea, who would have gotten a kick out of self-sacrifice and tried her best to submerge herself in his wonderfulness. Not that that’s a healthy thing for any human being to do, ever.

Comments are closed.