Review: Call Jane (2022)

Eerie timing for this one, a movie about Chicago’s The Jane Collective (a documentary about this same group came out this year as well). My review gave me the chance to sing the praises of Elizabeth Banks, in general. As my brother said to me last night, “She is a national treasure.” And talk about “national treasure”, Sigourney Weaver is in this, and it’s basically a two-hander, although Banks is the lead. It’s a joy to watch Weaver in this. She’s really easy, no discernible “acting”. Directed by Phyllis Nagy, whose screenplay for Carol was nominated for an Academy Award. This is her first feature. I reviewed for Ebert.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Max Ophüls’ Caught (1949)

Shot by Lee Garmes, Max Ophüls’ Caught is deeply gorgeous, every shot a work of art, with all of these de-stabilizing points of view, and in-camera “tricks” where human beings seem either miniaturized or giganticized – depending on the power hierarchies at play in any given scene. Again, this stuff is done in camera, but there are times when the effect is so striking you could swear the image had been doctored. A nervewracking tale of a young woman (Barbara Bel Geddes, heartbreakingly young and soooo open and accessible), kind of adrift in Los Angeles, going to “charm” school, where she learns how to be pleasing to men, doing a little modeling … all of this is basically one step away from prostitution, which the film makes explicit. The whole idea is to marry rich. She’s bought into it, she thinks that’s the only way she will survive, even though somehow she has maintained her ideals. The thought of going after a man for his money abhors her. She wants love.

Instead, she is the one snagged up by a rich man, the richest man, played by Robert Ryan at his most uncompromising iciness. Before she knows what’s happened, she’s locked up – literally – in his massive mansion – and is kept up all hours of the day and night, for the off chance that he might come home and need a hostess. It’s a nightmare.

She flees, and gets a job as a receptionist in a doctor’s office (the doctor played, with beautiful sympathy by James Mason). He has no idea she was the wife of a bazillionaire, even though there’s something about her hair style and her dress that makes him think something’s not quite on the level. She lives in a horrid little room, and immerses herself in her new job, finding capabilities she never knew she had. Of course, though, the past has a way of re-asserting itself. She is still married, after all. Robert Ryan is still out there. And he knows how to manipulate this poor young woman, and he does. The movie seesaws wildly between Long Island and Manhattan – between the doctor’s office and Robert Ryan’s mauseoleum of a mansion, where she is kept sleep-deprived – even when pregnant – to be ready for him should he need her. It’s a Gaslight-type situation. James Mason finds himself falling in love with her, but he is also really turned off when he hears her advising a little girl patient that it’s important to do such-and-such if she wants to marry a rich man. He tells her that it’s fine if SHE believes that, but he won’t have her pushing her silly beliefs onto his clients, many of whom are poor. Money isn’t everything. There are all kinds of interesting ideas at play here, and the acting is top-notch.

But LOOK at these shots. Max Ophüls’ camera floated through rooms, intricate but elegant, smooth and beautiful – almost like it was a living thing (witness his masterpiece, The Earrings of Madame de …. There are some real stunning camera moves throughout (one in particular where James Mason and the other doctor in his practice talk about life, all while her empty desk looms between them: lots of unsaid things swirling around). I was mostly taken though with the placement of figures in the frame.

Every single shot features massive differences in status, placement, so that … Robert Ryan, who was massive, sometimes looks tiny, with Barbara Bel Geddes looming over him, or, the other way around. So inventive. So disturbing.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Review: Aftersun (2022)

I’ve been really looking forward to this one. Charlotte Wells’ feature film directorial debut. It did not disappoint. I really loved it. I reviewed for Ebert.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Review: The Loneliest Boy in the World (2022)

If you’re getting confused about the logic in a zombie movie, then there’s probably something wrong. Granted, maybe there’s something wrong with me. But maybe it’s the movie, you feel me? I reviewed The Loneliest Boy in the World for Ebert.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Train travel, Sheila style

Dunkin Donuts, Jensen Ackles, and Victor Serge. Simultaneously.

Posted in Personal | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The boy in the green bandana

In Jafar Panahi’s entertaining yet pointedly critical film Offside, about five or six girls who dress up as boys in order to enter the Tehran soccer stadium for the World Cup qualifying match between Iran and Bahrain (filmed in 2005 during the actual soccer match in question). Girls are not allowed to enter stadiums. But they are soccer fans. Fanatics, even. They do what they have to do. One by one, they are busted by the eagle-eyed security guards, country bumpkin boys a little awestruck by the big city, and rounded up into a pen behind the stadium, while they wait for the Vice Squad to take them away.

Serious subject, yes? Yes. But Panahi’s touch and tone is one of mockery and levity, even more devastating in its ability to critique, the film moves at a zip zip zip pace (and if you ever get a chance to see it in a theatre with an audience: do it. It plays like a bat out of hell). Many of these awesome girls have no other credits to their name. In the film, they strain and lean against the barriers trying to hear what’s happening in the soccer game, arguing with the guards about how stupid it is to not allow girls to go to games.

They’re trash-talking smart-aleck city girls – who were brave enough to put on boys clothes and paint the colors of Iran on their faces and try to bust into a space where they’re not allowed – and the more traditional security guards are shocked but intimidated. Serious heated conversations between the girls and the guards suddenly cease when the roar of the crowd reach them – and the girls all start clutching each other in excitement about this or that play. They force the intimidated security guard to go around the corner and give them a play by play what is happening. He’s overwhelmed. He’s not strong enough to throw his weight around. He is no match for these girls. He does what they say. And stands at the corner, peeking at the game, and narrating it like a radio announcer.

In the film’s best scene, one of the girls – who plays on a girls’ soccer team and is probably the biggest soccer fan in the bunch – has to go to the bathroom. the guard says “Sorry. No bathrooms for girls in the stadium.” The girl begs and pleads. It’s an emergency. Does he want her to piss her pants right there where they stand? He finally caves and takes her off to go to the bathroom – but he makes her put a huge poster of one of the soccer players over her face. She doesn’t want to. It is so stupid to make her do this. She and the guard argue about it.

The guard wins this battle, so off they go to find the bathroom.

So you are treated to the absurd sight of a guard and this weird little person with a huge “mask” on trotting through the stadium (and remember: it was filmed during the actual game, on the fly). Humorously, as he hustles her through the stadium, she – who is in so much trouble, having been arrested – keeps stopping to peek over the crowds to see what’s happening on the field. The guard loses her behind him because she’s stopped, and he has to race back and yank her in line. I love her. Yes, I am arrested but FIRST THINGS FIRST, what’s going on on the field? The guard goes into the cavernous bathroom and orders every man in there to leave. The men are like “who do you think you are??” but the guard throws his weight around and the guys all leave. The poor girl, now hopping up and down in agony (with a huge poster wrapped around her face), races into one of the stalls while the irritated security guy stands guard at the doorway.

While she is doing her business in one of the stalls, a small group of rowdy boys enter the bathroom. They’re in a hurry to get to the urinals. They don’t want to miss a moment of the game. The guard stops them. “Sorry. you can’t come in here.” The boys : “The hell we CAN’T. Get out of the way.” (The class issue is present as it always is in Panahi’s films. These are all city kids and the guard has been shipped in from his family farm: he feels inferior to these more sophisticated people he’s supposed to boss around.) The guard holds his arms out to stop them from passing by and a scuffle ensues. It is five or six against one. The boys try to push him out of the way. They all start fighting.

It is at this moment that the girl – poster wrapped around her head – comes out of the stall. She is a sight to behold. I mean … one look at her and you think …. “wtf” – which is what all the boys do. First of all, it’s instantly obvious to them what is going on. She’s a girl. In a stadium filled with thousands of men. She may be wearing a baggy flannel shirt and baggy pants but … come on, that’s a girl. But … why … how … and what’s with the poster head …

The situation is humorous but it is also dangerous. Everything pauses. She’s already in danger. What might happen now? These are young guys, vibrating with testosterone and energy and they are segregated away from girls in their lives and a girl is right there in front of them. What if … I mean, it’s a distinct possibility. Things could get out of hand. The guard freaks out because now HE might get in trouble for allowing this girl to wander around willy-nilly in a sea of heaving men. He starts pushing at the boys to leave. The scuffle starts up again. Their fighting is blocking the doorway. She can’t squeeze past. She stands there, not sure what to do. She feels trapped and terrified. But everyone’s in the way. No way out. It’s a perilous moment for her.

The boy with the flag wrapped around his head like a bandana notices in a glance what’s happening, and he’s in the middle of fighting with the security guard, but he sort of leans his body inward, pushing the rest of the bodies in the scuffle inward, which gives her a small corridor in which to escape. And he gestures at the space he opened up like: “There you go now.”

And she flees.

It’s my favorite moment in the film. A moment of kindness, yes, but also a moment of something much more important: solidarity.

The hierarchy is clear: he is “above” her in status even though they’re about the same age, but that “status” is not IN him. It hasn’t infected his spirit or psyche. Status/hierarchy may be imposed from on high, but his small gesture of, “Go on, you can get by behind me” is eloquent. He’s not corrupted.

The boy might be perceived as an enemy since he’s a boy, and he can go into the stadium and do whatever he wants. But he’s not an enemy. He lets her run by him, he makes room for her. There’s room for her here. The space is already hers. No one should keep her from it. And he knows it.

This moment, for me, is like Bernstein’s glimpse of the girl in the white dress on the ferry in Citizen Kane: “I only saw her for one second. She didn’t see me at all, but I’ll bet a month hasn’t gone by since that I haven’t thought of that girl.”

I think about that boy in the green bandana all the time.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“And yet, the hope of creating again is a reason for existence.” — hero Jafar Panahi, from prison

I am having a distinct – and enraging – sense of deja vu right now.

11 years apart. Identical situation. Only the second one is worse. Because it’s 11 years later and we’re still dealing with this shit.

In July of this year, Iranian filmmaker Jafar Panahi, one of my faves, was arrested – again – along with filmmakers Mohammad Rasoulof and Mostafa Al-e Ahmad. The regime has been after Jafar Panahi for years. His arrest in 2010 and then the lifetime ban imposed on him – plus a hunger strike, and all kinds of other things – created an international uproar, which I wrote about heavily on this site. Panahi ignored the ban, and continued to make films, and his collaborators were arrested or had their passports taken away (it speaks to the respect of his peers that they would risk this). The films were smuggled out of the country – one inside a pastry, delivered directly to the Cannes Film Festival. Panahi is so high-profile there was a spotlight on the situation, and the regime obviously felt some restraint in dealing with him. But they’ve wanted to silence him. BAD. In July, a colleague of Panahi’s was arrested and there were protests outside the prison. Panahi went to the prison to find out what happened to his friend. He joined the protest and was promptly arrested. He is still in prison. I’ve heard his health is poor. Covid is ravaging the prison. Then, on September 16, Mahsa Amini was killed and Iran erupted. The eruption shows no sign of stopping, although reliable information is hard to come by, since the regime turned social media/internet off, the same way they did in 2009.

To backtrack: Back in 2011, Panahi’s situation made international news. He was supposed to be on the jury at the Biennale, but of course did not attend. An empty chair with his name on it stayed on the stage throughout, a reminder of Panahi’s situation – which was desperate. He was on hunger strike. Somehow – Panahi managed to get a letter out of prison and into Isabella Rossellini’s hands (she was the president of the Jury). And she read the letter from the stage at the Biennale, and its message was broadcast out into the world. I was beside myself during this period. A lot of us were.

Gear yourself up to listen to her read his letter. It’s devastating.

I felt so helpless. The only thing I could think to do at the time was to host a week-long blogathon to celebrate Iranian film. I just wanted to amplify all of those voices, those films, those artists living in a state of siege, not just Panahi. It was incredible the response.

I don’t think I saw what was coming. Panahi was released. International pressure did have an effect – and if you listen to what actual Iranians are saying right now – this is what they all are saying. It’s not virtue-signaling to post about Iran. Stop sitting back and criticizing non-Iranians for supporting Iran – if you yourself have never once paid any attention to Iran in your life. You know what that’s called? That’s called “privilege”. Iranians need us to post FOR them because the internet is fucking turned off. Tyrannies prefer privacy and silence to do their dirty work. Let’s deny them that privacy, shall we? Well, I will. You do what you want. If criticizing and/or snarking on those who show support for and solidarity with a long overdue revolution, then Twitter has infiltrated your response-system to a fatal degree and you are not someone I feel I need to listen to.

In 2011, Panahi was released from prison – clearly the regime felt the pressure – so technically he was “out”, but he was under house arrest, and a 20-year ban on filmmaking, travel, and/or interviews with foreign journalists was handed down. It was crushing. What was incredible – and I just feel lucky to have been alive and super tuned in to what was going on so I could participate in it fully – was …. Panahi ignored the ban. He kept making films. Granted, he had to make “indoor” films now – filmed in his own house – or, notably, in a car – whereas his normal style was a jittery and adrenaline-fueled Lumet-esque documentary-style out on the streets cinema – but … he kept making films. This is what I kept talking about in my post on Vaclav Havel, and Havel’s idea of living “as if” you were free, even if a regime keeps telling you you are not. (I have written about the “as if” idea in re: Iranian artists for years now.) Jafar Panahi ignoring the ban, risking the consequences – not just to his own life, but the lives of anyone who chose working with him – is the ultimate example of Havel’s hard-won command.

This situation – of Panahi secretly making films, which then left Iran (because of course they never played in Iran) and opened around the world – lasted for a decade, until last July, when the regime did what they have been wanting to do from even BEFORE the first arrest. They got him. And now they’re pissed. They don’t give a fuck about international opinion.

And so. Two nights ago. In a repeat of the 2011 Biennale, his latest film – No Bears – just premiered at the New York Film Festival. In another repeat, he is not free to attend because he is in prison, just like he was in 2011. In prison for criticizing a tyrannical government. His lead actress, Mina Kavani, made a speech from the massive stage at Walter Reader, and then held up a sign with the words WOMEN. LIFE. FREEDOM. I am in tears. She also read a letter from Panahi. You can see the whole clip below.

Here is the text of Jafar Panahi’s letter.

“We are filmmakers. We are part of Iranian cinema. For us, to live is to create. We create works that are not commissioned. Therefore, those in power see us as criminals. Independent cinema reflects its own times. It draws inspiration from society. And cannot be indifferent to it.

The history of Iranian cinema witnesses the constant and active presence of independent directors who have struggled to push back censorship and to ensure the survival of this art. While on this path, some were banned from making films, others were forced into exile or reduced to isolation. And yet, the hope of creating again is a reason for existence. No matter where, when, or under what circumstances, an independent filmmaker is either creating or thinking about creation. We are filmmakers, independent ones.”

I go into more detail here – in my birthday post for Panahi – written this year, before I heard he had been arrested. Panahi is in my Top 10 of living directors. His situation has been outrageous for years now and I could not admire him more for his courage and strength – but I am FURIOUS that he has had to be heroic this way, and couldn’t just make his films like any other director in any other country. Thank you Mina Kavani for spreading the word.

Posted in Directors, Movies | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Review: Stay the Night (2022)

My response to this movie was so strong I had to interrogate it a little bit. What is this bringing up in me? Why such a personal reaction? This calls into question the whole film critic thing in general. Why distrust a personal reaction? Isn’t that the whole deal? The problem with totally trusting your first reaction is sometimes you can get swept away by something that – on a second look – is fairly empty. And so you “relating” to it or something is actually a filter that might have more to do with where you are at at that particular time … and once you move out of that time, the film will reveal all its flaws. Meanwhile, you are on record praising it to the skies. This has happened to me. I have gotten things wrong. (The opposite is also true: I have been turned off by something, or for whatever reason I wasn’t in the right mood, and the movie didn’t work for me. Then, on a second look, I think, “What was my problem that I didn’t see this film’s CLEAR gifts?”) It’s more irritating when the second one happens – because then you are on record criticizing a movie that you end up loving. This is just part of the gig and I suppose it’s even more of a danger if you – typically – have strong reactions. (H.L. Mencken said the only requirement for a critic was that they have “a capacity for gusto”. Well. I have that.)

Stay the Night is one of those “two random people meet and spend a long night together wandering around, talking, having adventures, and ultimately it’s about the fragility of connection and the ephemeral nature of time” movies. I took a night to think about Stay the Night, and decided I still loved it, and that my love is pure. I watched it again. I loved it again. In fact, it was even MORE fun the second time, because I could just sit and revel in the actors’ work, their dynamic, their behavior.

This movie doesn’t take on any grand subject (although I would argue that finding a connection with another human being is the grandest subject of all). It’s not about How We Live Now. But this makes Stay the Night not only radical, but refreshing. It’s a romance. Sort of. With two interesting characters. There’s nothing I like better watching two people listen and talk, listen and talk, listen and talk, for an hour and a half. The two actors – Andrea Bang and Joe Scarpellino – are so damn good, and so damn into each other. You get drawn into their dynamic. I saw one critic call it “old-fashioned”. Yeah, because a man and a woman trying to connect is “old-fashioned” as opposed to … a major issue for literally MILLIONS perhaps BILLIONS of people.

Sometimes a movie just grabs you by the heart, and the only thing you can do is just SAY that.

So here’s my review at Ebert.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

R.I.P. Loretta Lynn

So much history passed through this woman’s life, so much history – of culture, of music, of social upheaval, of celebrity and technology – not to mention her own personal journey from poverty to fame – exists in her life. I spent yesterday watching old television clips and am swept away – as always – by the power of her voice, and the vivid-ness of her storytelling. There are times when she opens her mouth wide, to soar her voice upwards, and the sound pierces right through you. There was no one like her and she remains an almost untouchable icon. She’s “the one to beat”, to steal a phrase. Although you can’t beat her, you can just be inspired by her example.

One of the things I so love about her is that she sings her tough-minded “I’m not taking your shit anymore, man” songs with a huge bright smile.

Listen to the bluesy rhythm of that one: ^^ There’s a reason she had such wide crossover appeal, and shows – in the body of her work – the cross-pollination that was going on, and the similar source from which both sounds came. The source being the dirt.

There’s so much more where that came from. And thank you, Jack White, for your devotion to these iconic ladies born in the 1930s. Introducing them to new generations, and, in many cases, winning them Grammys and/or Billboard Top 100s (Wanda Jackson received her first of the latter because of her collaboration with Jack White.) And love the Jack White-Loretta Lynn album.

She was 90 years old. RIP Loretta Lynn.

Posted in Music, RIP | 2 Comments

Dynamic Trio #35

Gore Vidal, Truman Capote, and Tennessee Williams

Posted in writers | Tagged , , | Leave a comment