Review: Behaving Badly (2014)

large_behaving_badly_ver2_xlg

Grim.

My review is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Review: The Strange Little Cat (2014)

large_gwQsJoODmPrJhxGctj9DTa84Jw2

“The Strange Little Cat,” a debut feature by German director Ramon Zurcher, is such a strange little movie. I can’t stop thinking about it.

My review is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Books: Essays of E.B. White, “Good-bye to Forty-eighth Street”

411CY2YVJNL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_

Next book on my essays bookshelf:

Essays of E. B. White

Growing up, E.B. White’s children’s books, Charlotte’s Web, Trumpet of the Swan and Stuart Little were hugely formative influences. I read them over and over and over again. I maintain that Charlotte’s Web has one of the most moving endings in literature.

I can’t even re-type these words without tears coming to my eyes:

It is not often that someone comes along who is a true friend and a good writer. Charlotte was both.

Perfection.

White has an interesting background. He began as a reporter. Shortly after The New Yorker was founded in 1925, White started submitting stuff to it. A woman named Katherine Angell (her son is, famously, Roger Angell, another New Yorker institution) was the literary editor, and these manuscripts caught her eye. Angell thought White should be a staff writer for the magazine and that is what ended up happening. Angell and White also ended up marrying. So it was all very cozy and insular and literary and awesome. Angell died in 1977, and White followed her in 1985. E.B. White, along with his children’s books, and, of course, penning The Elements of Style with Mark Strunk, was a staff writer for The New Yorker for the entirety of his career, which lasted six decades. He also wrote columns for Harper’s Bazaar.The majority of the essays in this collection were originally published in The New Yorker. He was a master of the essay form. Life in minutia. Life boiled down into three pages. The essays are so simple, and yet so deep. He takes the mundane, the everyday, and ponders it, turning it over, his emotions accessible to the deeper meanings in these small moments (today’s essay being a perfect example).

In today’s self-confessional world, where personal essays are par for the course, his work acts as a refreshing tonic. They are confessional, but only because he wrote personally and simply about the things that mattered to him, about his observations and thoughts.

He also is one of the best “writers of New York” that there is. He writes about the city in ways that are still being imitated. He’s the one to beat. After September 11, his essay “Here is New York” resurfaced, and was mentioned constantly, due to one strangely prophetic paragraph about the vulnerability of skyscrapers to attacks from above. It is, perhaps, his most famous essay.

Here is another “New York” essay. In it, he describes the challenges involved in packing up his apartment in order to move somewhere else. It seems that he and his wife are moving out of the city. And so they are attempting to do a purge of their belongings, and finding it challenging. What to do with all your diplomas, say? Your “trophies”? Isn’t it depressing to keep them hanging around? Why do we keep acquiring stuff? We don’t even have to WORK at it and stuff piles up. The key is to throw out as much stuff as you acquire, but who does that? There’s always more coming in than going out. So he and his wife are “bivouacked” in a nearby hotel during the process, and go over every morning to tackle their possessions once again.

It’s disheartening in a way. White wonders if they will ever get it done. In the middle of the process, he suggests that they escape out of town for a weekend. They go to a country fair, up in Maine. Perhaps not a smart choice for those trying to avoid acquiring more stuff, because a fair is all about acquisition. There’s even a cattle auction.

And here is where White shines. Up until now, we’ve heard a mildly funny and extremely observant description of what it feels like to box up your apartment, and how you have to make choices about what to take and what to throw away. A universal experience. Anyone could relate. But while they were at the fair in Maine, Sputnik was launched up into the atmosphere.

Sputnik brings the essay to a new level. The world is also an “acquisitional” world. It seems to be our destiny.

Excerpt from Essays of E. B. White, “Good-bye to Forty-eighth Street.”

The day we spent at the Freyburg Fair was the day the first little moon was launched by the new race of moon-makers. Had I known in advance that a satellite was about to be added to my world, in this age of additives, I might have stayed in New York and sulked instead of going to the Fair, but in my innocence I was able to enjoy a day watching the orbiting of trotting horses – an ancient terrestrial phenomenon that has given pleasure to unnumbered thousands. We attended the calf scramble, the pig scramble, and the baby-beef auction; we ate lunch in the back seat of our flashy old 1949 automobile, parked in the infield; and then I found myself a ringside seat with my feet in the shavings at the Hereford sale, under the rattling tongue and inexorable hammer of auctioneer Dick Murray, enjoying the wild look in the whites of a cow’s eyes.

The day had begun under the gray blanket of a fall overcast, but the sky soon cleared. Nobody had heard of the Russian moon. The wheels wheeled, the chairs spun, the cotton candy tinted the faces of children, the bright leaves tinted the woods and hills. A cluster of amplifiers spread the theme of love over anything and everybody; the mild breeze spread the dust over everything and everybody. Next morning, in the Lafayette Hotel in Portland, I went down to breakfast and found May Craig looking solemn at one of the tables and Mr. Murray, the auctioneer, looking cheerful at another. The newspaper headlines told of the moon. At that hour of the morning, I could not take in the exact significance, if any, of a national heavenly body. But I was glad I had spent the last day of the natural firmament at the One Hundred and Seventh Annual Exhibition of the West Oxford Agricultural Society. I see nothing in space as promising as the view from a Ferris wheel.

But that was weeks ago. As I sit here this afternoon in this disheveled room, surrounded by the boxes and bales that hold my undisposable treasure, I feel the onset of melancholy. I look out onto Forty-eighth Street; one out of every ten passers-by is familiar to me. After a dozen years of gazing idly at the passing show, I have assembled, quite unbeknownst to them, a cast of characters that I depend on. They are the nameless actors who have a daily walk-on part in my play – the greatest of dramas. I shall miss them all, them and their dogs. Even more, I think, I shall miss the garden out back – the wolf whistle of the starling, the summer-night murmur of the fountain; the cat, the vine, the sky, the willow. And the visiting birds of spring and fall – the small, shy birds that drop in for one drink and stay two weeks. Over a period of thirty years, I have occupied eight caves in New York, eight digs – four in the Village, one on Murray Hill, three in Turtle Bay. In New York, a citizen is likely to keep on the move, shopping for the perfect arrangement of rooms and vistas, changing his habitation according to fortune, whim, and need. And in every place he abandons he leaves something vital, it seems to me, and starts his new life somewhat less encrusted, like a lobster that has shed its skin and is for a time soft and vulnerable.

Posted in Books | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Review: Ida (2014); directed by Pawel Pawlikowski

large_8F83ceVQBqcGHZ8aglA6kevKa3g

Ida is one of those miraculous films where the images on the screen are so startling, so unique, so themselves, that the visuals take on a whole subterranean level of meaning, coursing beneath the actual plot. The power of the images tell their own story. Often the characters are seen in the bottom of the frame, with space ricocheting up above their heads, tall trees, or a wrought-iron gate and window, or a wall. So we are forced to deal with the images on their own terms. They demand attention, but not in a pushy or distracting way. They ARE the story. Often the camera is static but what is going on in the frame, just in terms of its setup, is so arresting that you need that static quality just in order to take in what you are seeing. It’s like standing before a gigantic painting in the Met. Everything goes still as you face the grandeur and mastery of what is before you, and you need to slow everything down, inside, in order to look this way, that, to take it all in. So Ida‘s static quality then becomes an engine of enormous tension.

z14711116Q,Kadr-z-filmu---Ida---Pawla-Pawlikowskiego--Na-fest

Directed by Polish filmmaker Pawel Pawlikowski, Ida tells the story of Anna (Agata Trzebokowska). Anna (also known as Ida) is an orphan, who was raised in an orphanage before joining a convent. She is about to take her vows when the film begins. She is a young woman, with a serious alert face, and she gives herself over to her chores and her prayers and her convent duties with both a practical nature, stomping around in her work boots, and a rapture. It is an isolated and peaceful community, something that is to be treasured, especially in 1962 Poland, gripped in the vice of both Communist rule and the harrowing living memory of World War II. It is a Poland haunted by its own memories. Milan Kundera wrote a lot about “forgetting,” especially in terms of living under totalitarian rule. The role of “forgetting” in such situations is both a survival technique and a tragedy. An enforced system of belief, complete repression, complete censorship, has a way of dictating reality. Pawlikowski often places the figures in the bottom half of the frame, with empty space looming above them. It is a visual manifestation of that feeling of the burden of history, of forgetting. No other film looks like this.

Anna does not know that she is living in a state of “forgetting.” She has no memory of her parents. She does not know anything about them. She was a foundling. But all of that is about to change.

ida_01-560x282

Before the vow ceremony, the Mother Superior calls Anna in to her office and tells her to go visit her aunt Wanda, the only remaining member of her family. Wanda will not come to visit Anna, Anna has to go to her. Even though Anna has never met Wanda, did not know of Wanda’s existence, and is perfectly ready to take her vows and submit to the life of the convent, she obeys.

She shows up at Wanda’s door. Wanda is played by the absolutely magnificent Agneta Kulesza. Wanda is a judge, and spends her off-hours drinking too much and having random sex. She chain smokes. All of it is her own version of “forgetting,” a swan-dive into oblivion in order to wipe out the memories. We don’t know what those memories are at first. They are eventually revealed. A woman in her 40s, she lived through both the Russian/German carving up of Poland, and the Holocaust. In order to survive, she collaborated with the new Communist regime, and became a notable judge known as “Red Wanda,” ruthless with enemies of the state. In the character of Wanda, you can see the disorientation of an entire culture, overrun, destroyed, brutalized, conquered. People do what they must do to survive. But perhaps Wanda did so with a bit too much gusto? We don’t know for sure, but the haunting reality of her current life tells the whole story.

Meanwhile, within 5 minutes of Anna being in Wanda’s apartment, Wanda drops a bomb: “You do know you’re Jewish, right?”

No. Anna didn’t know.

Anna and Wanda set out in Wanda’s beat-up car to find out how Anna’s parents died. It is a quest for information. It is also a journey into the past, a past that was fractured, with millions falling into the abyss. Now, under Communist Rule, it is as though it never happened. Andrzej Wajda’s Katyn covers the same ground. Anna and Wanda drive through a bleak and beautiful landscape, with empty fields, the emptiness shrieking with what had happened there once.

ida_05

The relationship between Anna and Wanda, as it develops, is a major part of why Ida works so well, although it works on every level it needs to work. Anna is somewhat shocked by Wanda’s floozy ways, but, with a faint grin, she does admit she sometimes has “carnal thoughts,” too.

They interview people in the village where Anna hailed from, people who knew her parents, people who had shielded them from the Nazis, their nice Christian neighbors. Secrets fester. There is a ton of cultural and generational guilt, too huge to even be acknowledged. And Wanda shares in that guilt.

ida-pawel-pawlikowski-solopan-2013-10-08-037-920x690-900x675

There’s something about the way Pawlikowski films this quiet haunting story that makes it seem like it hails from the past. The modern world is not in evidence. The Cold War has descended, leaving a chill in the landscape. People lose themselves in music and dance, the little echoing hotel bars filled with revelers, as the outside world looms beyond the windows. Wanda and Anna pick up a hitchhiker, (Dawid Ogrodnik), a young guy who is a tenor saxophonist in a band, he’s on his way to a gig. Anna sits at a table in the bar, her nun’s habit dangling, looking on as the band jams out a John Coltrane tune after the gig. It seems like they are the only people alive.

ida 2_7094936

Anna and the saxophonist connect, in a tender and sweet and unspoken way. He knows she is looking for her parents. And that she is Jewish, despite the nun’s garb. He jokes, “I just found out I have some gypsy in me,” bonding with her, and she smiles.

ida-pawel-pawlikowski-solopan-2013-10-08-008-920x690

There are scenes where Anna stands at the top of the stairway in the hotel, the sound of the band echoing up the marble halls, life going on elsewhere, quiet and yet strong, as gigantic world events still wreak their havoc on the individual lives of the people onscreen.

99,99,0,en

What ends up happening is completely devastating. This is partially because the film goes at its subject matter in an oblique way. Scenes are filled with silence, the light streaming through the windows, or the car parked at a ramshackle filling station in the middle of a field, the figures dwarfed by the countryside. There is a lot of talk, but feelings aren’t really discussed. The feelings are there, they pulse off the screen, but something about the direction and the script helps us keep our distance. That distance is where the devastation comes from. I got the sense that I was in the presence of a completely brutalized landscape, scorched earth – not only literally but within people’s minds. The Nazis have almost become cartoon villains at this point, used repeatedly in cinema as unambiguous bad guys. There is nothing wrong with that, the Holocaust is a huge topic, and the mind balks at trying to understand. But the world shown in Ida has shadings of treachery and betrayal that arose as a byproduct of the German invasion, the fallout, so to speak. People do all kinds of terrible things to survive. One cannot be faulted for doing what one has to do, and things like honor and valor are abstract concepts when it comes to life and death matters. There were those who had good intentions towards their Jewish neighbors, but finally, inevitably, it became Us or Them. Anna and Wanda showing up on these people’s doorsteps, asking questions, brings back things they would rather forget.

24cinemapicIDA

The performances are revelatory, and the film is often quite funny. The only music we hear is that which plays on the radio, or record players, or from the little hotel bar band. Other than that, silence. Knocking on doors. Driving down roads. Wanda snoring in the hotel bed, passed out fully clothed, as Anna kneels and prays.

The film is so quiet that the devastation, when it comes, feels like a bomb going off deep below the ocean’s surface. The reverb is almost total. There is a delay before we start to feel the waves pulse up top, barreling towards the shoreline. You know something has been exploded. You don’t know what the destruction will look like. You have to wait and see.

IDA11-e1399248446321

Ida is still out in theaters, although probably not for long. If possible, you should see this one on the big screen. The film has been haunting me for two days. I can’t get what it looks like out of my mind. And what it looks like IS what it is about. The more I think about it, the bigger it seems.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 23 Comments

Review: This Is the End (2013)

large_qeUD7msuIMDm3VUxk48AQxdpdy0

Hilarious. Thought-provoking. Self-aware. But also with an undercurrent of true worry, a gnawing and growing awareness of “How do we live a good life? How do we be good people?” It is truly concerned about these things. This Is the End could so easily have felt like an inside joke, or just an excuse for a bunch of good friends to make a movie. One of those things where you think, “God, it must have been so much fun to make that. Too bad it’s not fun to watch it.” But This Is the End is fun and entertaining and sweet (sweet? Yes!!) and ridiculous and deep, from moment to moment to moment.

The film is out of its mind.

The end of the world erupts out of nowhere one night, when Seth Rogen and his buddies are all partying at James Franco’s house. Explosions. The sky opens up. Chaos. Destruction from the sky. A sinkhole opens up outside James Franco’s ridiculous house and swallows up the young celebrity set of Hollywood, gathered there for a party: Mindy Kaling bites it. Michael Cera plunges to his death. Kevin Hart dies. Rihanna falls into the pit. Jason Segel dies. Everyone dies, except for James Franco, Seth Rogen, Jay Baruchel, Jonah Hill, Craig Robinson, Danny McBride (my fantasy husband, my ideal man, just FYI), and Emma Watson. Hollywood Hills is in flames. Strange clawed beasts stalk the land.

The survivors hole up in Franco’s house (Baruchel’s first comment when he sees Franco’s house: “Who does he think he is? Pablo Escobar?”), dole out food, make video confessions, curl up in bed together when they’re scared, descend into Lord of the Flies-type fighting, problem-solve, scream, work on their relationships, and have to come to terms with what it means to be brave.

I can’t believe the whole thing works as well as it does. I kept waiting for it to derail. Not consciously, but it was there: will this continue to work? Will this mood hold? It does. It holds beautifully.

All of the performances are great, they’re all playing exaggerated and craven versions of themselves (Michael Cera’s version of himself is especially hilarious, as well as his gruesome death, which I laughed at throughout). In This Is the End James Franco idolizes Seth Rogen to such a degree that he has had two paintings made, one of his name, and one of Seth’s name, to hang in his main room. Seth looks up at it, and James looks at Seth eagerly. Seth is uncomfortable but James is so eager for praise that he has to say, “Wow, man. That’s… really cool.” Jonah Hill idolizes Jay Baruchel, even though Jay Baruchel is visibly uncomfortable with the entire group, and doesn’t understand why Jonah Hill is being so nice to him. What’s Hill’s angle? No one is that nice, right? Seth Rogen wants all his different groups of friends to get along. Craig Robinson is the nicest guy ever. Jonah Hill turns on Jay Baruchel and ends up privately praying to God, asking him what the hell he was thinking on the day he created Jay Baruchel.

But they have to put aside their petty disagreements in order to, you know, survive the ensuing apocalypse.

Emma Watson gets separated from the group in the beginning and then hacks her way into Franco’s house with an axe, demanding shelter. The guys are all thrilled to see she is safe, but also concerned, because now they have to re-divide the food into smaller portions. They look at each other. Dammit, will there be enough water for all of us now? Jay Baruchel pulls the guys aside and tries to bring up the fact that she’s a female, and they’re all guys, so “we just should be mindful of that …” and all of the rest of them are baffled, like, “What are you talking about? She’s our friend. Mindful of what?” Jay: “I’m just saying … we should be sensitive to how she might be thinking … so let’s not be … rapey or whatever …” They all explode: “WOAH. WHAT?” “Nobody here is being rapey but you.” “I wasn’t even thinking rapey thoughts about her but now I am because of you.” “Nobody’s raping anyone here.” And on and on. Emma Watson overhears their whispered conversation and proceeds to attack all of them with her axe, before fleeing into the burning Hollywood Hills: she’d rather be out there than in Franco’s house with her FRIENDS who all appear to be discussing whether or not to RAPE her. (It’s yet another example – Neighbors being another recent one – of how a rape joke can be freakin’ hilarious if it’s done right.)

And any movie that has Jonah Hill chained to a bed, speaking in a demonic voice, all as Jay Baruchel stands over him, hoodie on, holding up a cross made up of tied-together spatulas, shouting, “THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU” is a-okay by me. Not to mention a crazy cameo by Channing Tatum.

The film is both silly and profound: it’s my favorite combination, and so difficult to accomplish. Nearly impossible. You can get the silliness, and then the profundity feels forced, or you get the profundity and the moments of silliness feel arch, and imposed. This Is the End combines both, beautifully, seamlessly. The ending, which I wouldn’t dream of revealing, is so delightfully loopy and also emotionally connected that I found myself laughing and tearing up at the same time, and also laughing at MYSELF that I was tearing up.

This Is the End was one of my favorite films of 2013.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 16 Comments

The Elvis Puzzle

Every year, we stay in the same house, a big rambling old house, with a gigantic wraparound porch, perched on the edge of a huge hill that leads down to the lake. Our family has grown exponentially this year, with three new members, and we move in and TAKE OVER. We have been going there for years now and there are many precious memories wrapped up in this house. And there are still things to discover. My sister Jean found a jigsaw puzzle upstairs and told her daughter Lucy to “go give it to Auntie She-She.” (That would be me.) So little Lucy approached, and handed me the box, not sure why I would want the puzzle, but doing what her mother said. And it was an Elvis jigsaw puzzle. A black and white photo of Elvis in the 1950s, with the greasy ducktail and the one curl over his forehead, and a sweet snarl on his lips.

Lucy was fascinated by the fact that I was interested in it. She looked at the photo of Elvis.

“Is that a girl?” she asked (which I thought was FASCINATING. The gender-bendy Elvis shadow lengthens through the decades! He is still confusing people!)

I said, “No, honey, that’s a boy. He was a famous singer.”

Lucy looked slightly sad and cautious and said, “Is he dead?” (In tune with the past tense, meaning she’s a wicked smartypants.)

“Yes.”

She thought about it. She asked, “Did he have a family, She-She?” She seemed worried.

I said, “Yes. He has a daughter who is around my age, and she’s doing great.” (I didn’t want her to be worried about anyone, least of all Lisa Marie Presley.)

She thought about that. “Was there a Mommy?”

“Yes, there was!”

More thinking, more worrying. “Is she dead?”

“No, honey. She’s alive and well, too.”

Then Lucy asked, “Was he a friend of yours?” and my entire family started laughing.

And basically the puzzle was too hard for us to do. It was all black and white, so you couldn’t even group the colors together, and his face was made up of a mosaic of tiny little Elvis faces and newspaper clippings, etc., and they all looked the same. Lucy and I tried to work on it for about 10 minutes and then both got bored.

10385306_10152334440962632_6047484063419670296_n

14566758080_081d0fcbae_z

14730443356_a35f9cb9b6_z

But Elvis stayed scattered on the table for the entirety of the week, in case anyone felt like working on it.

Elvis is Everywhere, part infinity …

Posted in Personal | Tagged | 3 Comments

Vacation Books

14753466035_e4aa86686e_z

I had brought Rebecca West’s Black Lamb and Grey Falcon on vacation with me, which I am loving re-reading, as well as Evelyn Waugh’s Sword of Honor, which I have never read and am in love with already. It’s already made me laugh out loud three times and I’m only on page 12. Choosing what to read on vacation is a weighty decision. But you also have to be willing to throw out what you planned and choose your route spontaneously, should the occasion arise. Game of Thrones was on the bookshelf at the house where we were staying. I have never seen one episode of the show. I have never read any of the books. For no particular reason, I love all of those actors, and love Peter Dinklage, but, you know, I am extremely behind in television watching in general. I enjoy Martin in interviews, he’s a fascinating guy, but just never read any of his work. But suddenly last week I picked it up one day, took it down to the dock with me, lay on my towel, read only the Prologue, and thought, immediately, with something akin to despair: “Oh shit. Now I have to read all the books. Dammit.” Based only on the Prologue! The characters are amazing, the world is totally fleshed out and lived in, it feels real down to its underlying architecture, and he’s a beautiful writer. Had a lot of fun reading it over this past week (I finished it yesterday morning), but even more fun was talking about it with my nephew Cashel, who has read all the books (so far). Our conversation lasted the whole week. “So what’s happening now?” he would ask me as he joined me on the dock. Then we would talk it out and discuss plot and characters and the TV show and the adaptation and it was so fun. I love my nephew! He is such a great person, smart and funny and kind and caring. I will continue on with the rest of the series, and text him my thoughts, so we can keep the conversation going.

And Cashel’s vacation read? Cat’s Cradle was one of them (he’s as fast a reader as I am, and blows through two books in a day sometimes), so we had a lot of fun talking about that too.

Posted in Books | 9 Comments

Vacationing With a Family of Project Runway Fans

10525687_10152335608907632_1435263846122133846_n

Posted in Personal, Television | Leave a comment

Seen on Highway 91, Vermont

14553895089_56cb18b061_z

It’s not the exact make and model, but it’s close enough to be a doppelgänger.

Posted in Personal | Tagged | 7 Comments

Supernatural: Season 2, Episode 2: “Everybody Loves a Clown”

c44

Directed by Phil Sgriccia
Written by John Shiban

Believe me, every man has his secret sorrows,
which the world knows not; and oftimes
we call a man cold, when he is only sad.

Hyperion, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

You do not know the burdens that other people carry. Longfellow wrote those words in 1839. In every era, there are expectations of what a certain thing should look like, be it joy or love or pain. Cultural norms shift and morph over the years and currently we are in a time when the “self-help culture” dictates what things should look like. So things like repression and denial and sublimation are seen as bad, or at the very least unhealthy. This is treated as fact. It is not fact. It is an opinion, a theory, a fad (albeit a long and deeply entrenched fad). And there is a lot of evidence suggesting the opposite, actually: that something like repression is a valid and useful survival technique, honed over thousands of years of brutal human experience, and not necessarily unhealthy at all. Try telling that to someone who has swallowed the self-help culture wholesale. It is as though you are speaking heresy.

I like one of my acting teacher’s definitions of “sublimate”: “You take your pain, and you make it sublime.” I have been doing that since I was a kid. Therapy didn’t save my life when I was a suicidal 12-year-old. Ralph Macchio did. Sublimation is a way of life for me. I know that a lot of it comes from loneliness (as a permanent condition, not a phase), but hell, it’s a good deal for me, because I could be sublimating through drugs or self-destructive behavior but I get so much pleasure out of culture and movies and books. It’s a win-win.

This is the landscape of the opening episodes of Supernatural‘s Season 2. John Winchester is dead. Sam and Dean are both grieving in their own ways, and neither of them can talk about it, at least not in a way that opens up space. Loss is not a monolith. Not everyone is going to be impacted in identical ways. The issue I have with the self-help culture is that it prioritizes what something looks like on the outside. And that’s why Longfellow’s words are so important to keep in mind. Sometimes a loss results in someone recoiling, hunching over their own metaphorical wound, protectively. This is not being in denial. This is an appropriate reaction to being wounded.

Continue reading

Posted in Television | Tagged , , , , , | 104 Comments