December 2024 Viewing Diary

The Last Showgirl (2024; d. Gia Coppola)
Pamela Anderson gives my favorite performance by a woman this year. I reviewed the film for Ebert.

Dark Waters (2019; d. Todd Haynes)
I love movies about rapacious evil corporations, and a dogged individual who takes these fuckers down. Todd Haynes brings a solemnity and also a gleam to the visuals – the glass windows of the downtown buildings, the dizzying reflections, compared to the grit and roughness of the countryside, those bleak farms and suburbs, all the greys and blacks. Mark Ruffalo’s character is so interesting! And so is his wife. I honestly think this is one of Anne Hathaways’ best. She has an intense scene with Tim Robbins in the hospital and she crushes it. Great film.

The End (2024; d. Joshua Oppenheimer)
I reviewed this dystopian musical, starring Tilda Swinton and Michael Shannon, for Ebert.

Juror #2 (2024; d. Clint Eastwood)
It’s so good! This could very well be Clint Eastwood’s final film. He’s in his 90s. Extraordinary filmmaker and artist. Nicholas Hoult is having a YEAR, as they say. He’s in three major films and each role is totally different. I have such fond memories of him as a child in About a Boy. He’s very very good.

Subtraction (2022; d. Mani Haghighi)
Wow, this film is haunting and strange: one of my other favorite “genres” along with corporation-corruption: doppelganger movies. Starring Taraneh Alidoosti, whom I’ve written about a lot. She plays a double role. Two women who look exactly alike. To say more would be to ruin the twists and turns of this extremely emotional film, with such a destabilized mood and feel. What would it be like to have another you running around? And yet the characters are so different. One is sleek and polished, one is almost puffy with her despair and worry. You instantly know which one is which when she’s onscreen. Great acting job. But they’re all good. This one does not have US distribution (and you can see it is dated 2022. I wonder if Taraneh getting arrested somehow buried it.) People should be able to see it.

Three Wise Girls (1931; d. William Beaudine)
The “three wise girls” are played by Jean Harlow, Mae Clarke, and Marie Prevost. This was Harlow’s first starring role. I wonder if people not familiar with Jean Harlow, beyond her image in glam shots, etc. – would be surprised by how natural she is as an actress? This Pre-Code features Harlow as Cassie, a small-town girl who decides to follow the lead of an old friend, and move to the big city. She wants the glamorous independent life it seems her friend Gladys (Mae Clarke) has. The reality is a little different, though. The friend works as a model – which seems very glamorous, and Cassie gets a job as a model too – but Gladys is essentially a “kept” woman, living in a penthouse paid for her by her rich (married) boyfriend. The third wise girl is Dot, Cassie’s roommate. Dot works from the apartment, in an early example of a remote job, and is a wisecracker, who develops a crush on a chaffeur – and honestly Dot is the only one who keeps her head about her in the big city. The details are what makes it. Each character is distinct, the three women all give very good performances.

Out of Here (2013; d. Donal Foreman)
Criterion was streaming three of Foreman’s films, and I highly recommend checking out this Irish filmmaker’s work. Out of Here is the story of a young Irish guy who returns home to Dublin after a year in Australia. He’s broken up with his girlfriend and kind of can’t get over her. He re-enters the swirl of Dublin night-life, reconnecting with old friends but … they aren’t in college anymore. Might be time to start growing up. But how? A very honest funny charming film.

Say Nothing (2024; d. Michael Lennox, Mary Nighy, Anthony Byrne, Alice Seabright)
The series gets side-tracked by the High Drama of the Price sisters (understandably, I want to make clear. The Price sisters are a VIBE). It’s not that they’re tangential to the story, of course they are crucial figures in untangling the present-day mystery of what happened to Jean McConville, but … the real story is Jean McConville, and how the Belfast Project played a role in all of it, or at least the fallout. I mean, it’s definitely there. But there are a couple of episodes featuring JUST the adventures of the two teenage girls in berets joining the IRA and blowing up a building in London (and getting busted immediately). Then we have more episodes showing Dolours’ marriage to Stephen Rea, her alcoholism, etc. I feel like none of that is actually the point, although fascinating. Dolours took over the narrative – and this is understandable, again, but for a couple of episodes I forgot about Jean McConville. The oral history project also made international headlines, due to Boston College’s role in all of it (look it up: it’s very recent history). I followed all of these events in real time because I know two of the main figures in the story – Brendan Hughes was best man at their wedding. They were both interviewed heavily for Patrick Radden Keefe’s book. I stayed with them when I was in Belfast – and, while I had no idea at the time of course – the Belfast Project was being compiled while I was there. Coincidentally, and weirdly, I’m also connected to the Boston College “liaison” of this whole thing (my dad’s Irish book collection is housed at BC – purchased by the guy who was ALSO the famous liaison – this “liaison” was at my dad’s wake). I only mention this because it’s weird to be adjacent to these massive events. The series is very well done, again, and I was engrossed by it (horrified, saddened, outraged). But there are definitely conversatinos to be had about the book and the series. This is a must-read.. I trust my friends, who were there, who lived it, who had a huge part in telling this story. And I know they are proud of their part in it (and approve of how they were presented). That matters.

Shopworn (1932; d. Nick Grinde)
A Pre-Code I haven’t seen which is always exciting. A young Barbara Stanwyck plays a girl who, after her father is killed, gets a job as a waitress with her horribly strict aunt and uncle. She grew up surrounded by men in a labor camp – so she knows how to handle the flirty guys asking her out as she tries to ring them out. (I love the subliminal “No Sale” on the cash register). She has a “reputation”, even though she hasn’t done anything. Before you know it, she’s sneaking out with a boyfriend (Regis Toomey). He is a very nice guy, but his snooty-dowager mother forbids her precious son to have anything to do with that bad girl. Regis Toomey was a stolid regular character actor (who, near the end of his career, played a stern priest in the Elvis movie Change of Habit): Toomey rarely paid romantic parts so this was cool to see.

Anthony Jeselnik: Fire in the Maternity Ward (2019; d. Marcus Raboy)
I’ve been very turned off by the way standup comedy has been co-opted by these muscle-men roided-out misogynists who position themselves as free speech warriors, and then whine and bitch when they get criticized. The Joe Rogan effect. For such tough guys, they sure are whiny snowflakes. I was talking with my brother about this and he recommended I check out Anthony Jeselnik. I did. I am now obsessed. He’s doing something very different. And he’s now being very vocal about how much he thinks the whole comedian-podcast culture has hurt standup comedy. His jokes are vicious and dark and not for everyone but it’s different from these rich unfunny guys getting up and complaining about mean comments on YouTube and calling it a “Netflix comedy special”.

Lady of the Dunes: Hunting the Cape Cod Killer (2024; showrunner Maija Norris)
This is a terrible story and even though it all happened in my (general) neck of the woods, I had never heard of it before. Let’s hear it for the lesbian cop who devoted her career – and lost her career – trying to solve this case.

Anthony Jeselnik: Bones and All (2024; d. Bill Benz)
See what I mean? I’m obsessed. This dropped in November. He’s carved out his own weird little lane. He’s a loner. I’ve been watching interviews with him, and I’m fascinated. He’s smart. He thinks deeply about what he’s doing. He’s a huge reader. Sally Rooney is one of his favorite authors. I could go on. In a conversation about books that should be on high school curriculum, he recommended Play It as It Lays. Play It as It Lays. What?? I want to interview him about books and his reading habits. Just putting it out there.

Babygirl (2024; d. Halina Reijn)
I reviewed for Ebert. I see the film as a comedy, or a comic-opera – with elements of both. Or maybe it’s more like a fable. I don’t see this as a typical “erotic” film where sex is seen as this big serious thing that really is best within the confines of marriage. Still thinking about it and looking forward to seeing it again.

American Psycho (2000; d. Mary Harron)
The tone of this captures a vibe – the snarky halfway-soulless Bret Easton Ellis vibe, and Harron establishes this very bold tone, and it’s carried into the filmmaking, the production design (so many mirrors), the casting. It’s a commentary on Wall Street bros and the fucked-up male value system that dehumanizes others, especially women. The tone is funny, though. I love Mary Harron.

The Order (2024; d. Justin Krezel)
This is so good. Jude Law has been working for 25 years. I think this is his best performance. Based on a true story. Nicholas Hoult again. White supremacists up in Idaho, the Northwest. The killing of the radio host. The FBI, the “order” – an “offshoot” of Aryan Nation – blah blah all those fucking losers. It’s gorgeous film-making too.

Archipelago of Earthen Bones – to Bunya (2024; d. Malena Szlam)
A 20-minute films featuring a series of dissolves showing volcanic mountains from Chile to the Bunya Mountains in Australia. It’s haunting. And there were parts that were almost frightening, and I’m not sure why. Suddenly the camera would move, and I’d have a visceral reaction to it.

The Ballad of Suzanne Césaire (2024; d. Madeleine Hunt-Ehrlich)
Zita Hanrot plays Suzanne Césaire, a surrealist writer who only wrote seven essays, but those essays are extremely influential and establish her as a major figure, in not just surrealism but Afro-Caribbean anti-colonial resistance. Hunt-Ehrich’s contemplative experimental work is an act of redress, or reclamation. Césaire destroyed most of her work. At one point Hanrot looks right at the camera and says, “We are making a film about an artist who didn’t want to be remembered.”

Too Funny to Fail: The Life & Death of The Dana Carvey Show (2017; d. Josh Greenbaum)
I wept with laughter watching this documentary about the short-lived Dana Carvey Show, starring the then-unknown Stephen Colbert, Louis Ck, and Steve Carell. I remember that show. Germans Who Say Nice Things.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Monthly Viewing Diary, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

“I went from being obsessed with L.A. punk rock to being a part of it.” — Milo Aukerman

It’s the birthday of Descendents’ front man Milo Aukerman. The Descendents – and the album Milo Goes to College – were huge for my brother Brendan back in the day, which he wrote about in an essay I posted here. Milo Aukerman was both 1. a punk rock musician and 2. a science nerd on his way to being an actual scienTIST. Which he did eventually become. The Descendents are still kicking around, and the nostalgia factor is high. When I first posted my brother’s essay on Instagram, and hashtagged it, tons of people showed up, flocking to it. They remember. And you’re part of the coolest crowd if you remember the Descendents. Just tripped over an interesting recent piece on Pitchfork, where Aukerman listed the music he loved, the music that influenced him, or just turned him on. I love pieces like this.

But go read my brother’s essay!

Part of the reason why I do these “birthday posts” is to highlight writing in my 20-years (and counting) archive. Even I forget what’s in there. It’s good to resurrect things periodically for new people to discover.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Music, On This Day | Leave a comment

My Ideal New Year’s Eve Party … Is Fictional

I’m not much for New Year’s Eve (I have already covered this), and I’m not much for big parties anymore, nor am I into people who can’t hold their liquor. My friend Ann Marie calls New Years Eve “open mic night for alcoholics.”

But there is a New Year’s Eve party I would like to go to. It’s the one from Penny Serenade (1941), starring Cary Grant and Irene Dunne, where Dunne’s realistically cramped New York apartment is filled with carousing people, the rugs rolled up for dancing, with people making out in corners of every room. Hostess Irene Dunne waits anxiously for her boyfriend to show up, but she’s also waiting for the bootlegger to arrive because she’s running out of illegal booze.

Then comes an excited tete a tete on the snowy fire escape with her boyfriend Johnny (Grant), a semi-aimless young guy who wants to do big things in his life, he’s just not sure what. He’s got news for her. He’s gotten a great job offer, very exciting, but the bad news is he needs to leave for Japan THAT NIGHT, like RIGHT NOW. Time is of the essence, so he asks her to marry her then and there on the fire escape. Of course she says Yes.

The happy couple make their way through the partiers in the apartment, and they race off into the night with two excited friends (to be witnesses) to find a justice of the peace who can do the deed. At one o’clock in the morning.

There is a hurried wedding, with the judge in his pajamas, and then the two race to the train station so he can head off to his new job.

They both get on the train, him to settle in, and her to say goodbye before the train leaves. They stand in his little sleeping compartment, still out of breath from their whirlwind. They’re married now. He’s leaving. What do they do now? He takes her in his arms. At that moment, the train chugs, blows its whistle, and slowly starts to move. She murmurs anxiously, “The train’s leaving!” He reaches out to close the door of his compartment, saying, “We’ll get you off.” (Nobody on any censorship board noticed this super hot double entendre.)

Then director George Stevens cuts away from the scene, showing a snow-covered sign saying NEW HAVEN 120 MILES. He cuts again, showing another sign: NEW HAVEN, with the train pulling into that station. This is a perfect cut. A model of efficiency and innuendo. 120 miles is plenty of time to get off, to put it crudely.

She stands on the empty platform, and he leans out the window waving to her as the train pulls away. She waves, and weeps, with snowflakes on her face. It’s a beautiful sequence.

Before all this happens, however, the two of them – engaged just moments ago – stand on the fire escape (and just like the apartment, it’s a realistic New York fire escape, it’s not a Hollywood-ized version), embracing as the snow falls around them. The clocks ring midnight, and you can hear people singing “Auld Lang Syne” from other apartments on the block, as well as from the partiers inside her apartment. People on another fire escape, across the way, call out “Happy New Year” to the happy young couple and Irene and Cary call “Happy New Year” back, exhilarated.

This is so much what it’s like in New York at New Year’s, at least outside the mania of Times Square.

I’d like to be at that party.

I’d like to roll up the rugs.

I’d nurse my drink until the bootlegger got there.

Waiting for my boyfriend to arrive.

Posted in Movies, Personal | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments

“My ambition is to be an actress. Hollywood had no parts for me.”—Theresa Harris

It’s her birthday today.

Criminally, Theresa Harris often went uncredited in the films she appeared in. Nevertheless, she always made an impression. She is probably most well-known now for her unforgettable and realistic performance in the pre-Code Baby Face, as Chico, best friend of Barbara Stanwyck. She also played Jean Harkow’s BFF in Hold Your Man, and had a big role opposite Ginger Rogers in Professional Sweetheart. In Baby Face, she and Barbara Stanwyck, trapped in their positions as speakeasy waitresses – at the mercy of violent handsy men – come up with a plan to get out. Stanwyck will sleep her way out of there into the higher echelons of society and will bring Chico with her. That’s exactly what happens. It’s not a pretty story! But their friendship is a galvanizing force.

if you’ve seen Baby Face, then you know that you don’t forget her. It’s practically a two-hander.

She ends up being Barbara Stanwyck’s “maid”, but the quotation marks are necessary. It’s almost like her maid function is a cover, part of their shared cover story hiding what they are really up to, which is attempting to haul themselves out of poverty and prostitution. Neither one can do it alone. At a crucial moment late in the film, Stanwyck, now perched in a penthouse, is presented with an even greater opportunity, and her “maid” is brought up in the conversation, basically in the context of “You can get rid of her now and hire a proper staff”, and Stanwyck, face turned away, barely moving, says, in a flat uncompromising voice, “Chico stays.” Non-negotiable.

When the Code came down, interracial friendships like this one vanished from the screen practically overnight.

Harris had uncredited roles in many films now considered classics – Gold Diggers of 1933 (she’s part of a canoodling couple in the number “Pettin’ in the Park”), Morning Glory, Horse Feathers. She was Bette Davis’ maid in Jezebel. At the time, Harris boldly spoke to the press about her frustrations with the lack of opportunities, and this is of the many reasons I admire her, beyond her talent. She spoke the truth of what non-white actors faced in Hollywood, at a time when there really wasn’t a sympathetic listening public for this kind of message.


Theresa Harris and Ginger Rogers, “Professional Sweetheart” (1933)


“Hold Your Man” (1933)

Any time she shows up you remember her. For example: she’s in the film noir classic, Out of the Past, directed by Jacques Tourneur. She appears in just one scene where she’s questioned by Robert Mitchum. Mitchum tracks her character down at a nightclub. She sits at a table, she has flowers in her hair, and she’s out with a date.

She looks glamorous, her date is handsome, she’s out having fun, she’s a woman “having it all”, a life happening off-screen. Producer Val Lewton adored her and used her a lot. He was known for giving Black actors non-stereotypical roles, roles with a little bit more meat on them, roles where they could be people, not stereotypes. You can see this in Harris’ performance in Cat People. Let’s not get it twisted: It’s a nothing part, she’s only in it for a moment, but you remember her. Harris plays a sarcastic waitress. And sarcasm shows a sense of self, a sense that this waitress knows the score. She’s not submissive. She’s not a stereotype. It’s why you remember her.

Harris appeared in another Lewton production – I Walked With a Zombie, also directed by Jacques Tourneur, and went on to be active in the burgeoning live television “scene” in the 1950s, which gave way more opportunities to all kinds of actors than the strict studio system.

Theresa Harris’ experiences in the Pre-Code screwball era inspired the play By the Way Meet Vera Stark, written by Lynn Nottage, which premiered off-Broadway in 2011 (starring the great Sanaa Lathan, a fave of mine, wrote about her here). It’s about a maid-slash-actress in the Pre-Code period, told in a screwball tone, mimicking the screwball films in which Harris often appeared.


Stephanie J. Block and Sanaa Lathan, “By the Way Meet Vera Stark”

Thanks to the advent of videotape these films came back into circulation in the 70s and 80s, and now – just for example – TCM has done day-long tributes to Harris. This is a long-overdue recognition of her gift!

Posted in Actors, Movies, On This Day | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“I won’t apologize for trying to write for smart people.” — Paul Westerberg

It’s Paul Westerberg’s birthday today.

My brother Brendan is the Westerberg Fan, and I will always associate The Replacements with my brother, whose fandom began in high school and continued unabated until this day. I posted all of my brothers’ music essays here on my site – because they were consigned to oblivion on his old blog, and I thought they were all just too good to lie there hidden. Many of the pieces have to do with the Replacements and/or Paul Westerberg in his solo career. Brendan wrote about albums and he wrote about seeing The Replacements and/or Paul Westerberg solo in concert. Being a Replacements fan is a certain kind of fandom. It’s its own thing. This is so much the case that an entire documentary was created about being a Replacements fan, and Brendan was interviewed for it (the director tripped over one of Brendan’s pieces and reached out!) Heres the trailer for Color Me Obsessed:

Brendan describes his fandom – and why he is such a fan – so beautifully and his enthusiasm is catching. So here are the pieces he wrote. Enjoy!

50 Best Albums, #38. The Replacements, Let It Be

50 Best Albums, #31. Paul Westerberg, Suicaine Gratifaction

Warsaw, Pt. 2: How He Became Paul

The Legendary Boy In The Rafters

The Element of Danger

Time Operator/Answering Machine: Westerberg and Walker

“It’s fun, but the fun is where it always was. I mean, it’s still fun to strap on my Les Paul in the basement and turn up the Marshall amp. I’m still 15. I still enjoy that as much as I ever did.” — Paul Westerberg

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Music, On This Day | Tagged | 6 Comments

2024 Roundups

The New York Film Critics Circle Awards for 2024

Ebert: The Best Films of 2024

Liberties: My Top 20 Films of 2024

Ebert: The Great Performances of 2024, Part One

Ebert: The Great Performances of 2024, Part Two

2024 in review

Ebert: 14 Underrated Movies of 2024

Books read in 2024

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Actors, Books, Movies | Leave a comment

14 Underrated movies of 2024

Rounded up by the contributors at Ebert: some films you might have missed, and people miss so much these days, not for lack of trying – but because movies get buried now. (Speaking of which: one of the best pieces I’ve read all year is the absolutely brutal and well-researched “Casual Viewing” by Will Tavlin, about Netflix.)

For the roundup, I wrote – again – about Tyler Taormina’s Christmas Eve in Miller’s Point. Full round up here. Christmas Eve in Miller’s Point is in my own personal Top 20.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Movies | 12 Comments

2024 Books Read

1. Brotherhood of Tyrants: Manic Depression and Absolute Power, by D. Jablow Hershman
I was talking with the doctor who helps me manage my bipolar. He saved my life back in 2013. Well, it was a group effort. He knows me well. I was talking about my lifelong interest in dictators and he recommended this book. Making a connection between mental illness and something else – artistic ability or becoming a murderous dictator, for example – is seen as “dangerous”, I suppose. Maybe yeah in the wrong hands it would be a bad thing. But I like the thought-experiment. (Kay Jamison’s Touched With Fire ruffled so many feathers when it was published but for me – someone suffering from anguish I can’t even describe – her book was so important. It actually suggested that, in terms of human evolution, mood disorders have their place, can be useful. Otherwise they would have been “selected” out of existence.) My interest in dictators is, to some degree, about what the world looks like to a Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot. I think it’s important to try to understand how they think so we can recognize what’s going on as it’s going on. Hm, seems a bit relevant right now.

2. Heroines, by Kate Zambreno
Her fragmentary “snapshot” style – the paragraphs separated out into little discrete thoughts, stand-alone and yet working cumulatively – is inspiring to me.

3. The Man Without Qualities Vol. 1: A Sort of Introduction and Pseudo Reality Prevails, by Robert Musil
I read a lot of very long books this year. Books that took me months to complete. This was the first of them. I honestly don’t know if I can make it through Volume 2, which is even longer. But it was a very interesting experience, even with its tedium. In fact, the tedium I think was part of the point. Musil goes on and on and on detailing the rather silly and superficial life of this guy, and his involvement in the planning committee for an event celebrating the Habsburg Empire. Nobody can agree on anything. Nobody can agree on what form the celebration would take. Chapters and chapters are devoted to planning meetings, and little romances, and the superficiality of the entire world, and it’s eerie because this world is about to end. These people are planning a celebration for the world they think is forever. Meanwhile, that very same world – and their blessed Empire – gallops towards a cliff.

4. Waking the Dead, by Scott Spencer
I was thinking of writing something about the film adaptation of this book, but then decided not to, the political vibe in this country being what it is right now. I just couldn’t do it. I didn’t have the stomach for it. But in the preparation phase, I read the book (which I had never read before). Spencer wrote Endless Love, a smash hit to end all smash hits. The movie is pretty faithful to the book. I think it’s probably Jennifer Connelly’s best performance.

5. The Meaning of Hitler, by Sebastian Haffner
See the above notation for Brotherhood of Tyrants. In my Hitler-reading, this book is often in the bibliography so I decided to check it out. It’s a biography – kind of – but it’s more an examination of him psychologically, and all the different forces that formed him. He was formed early. It all was there before he even went into politics. I highly recommend this book.

6. My Name is Barbra, by Barbra Streisand
It’s rare for a book to be such an event everyone reads it at the same time. Everyone puts down whatever else they are reading to take up the new one. You literally drop everything. And you talk about it with everyone. Barbra’s tome of memoir was an event. There’s so much to say about it but one of the reasons I loved it so much – and consider it a bit of a miracle – is how in-depth she goes with her own process as an actress. She talks about the choices she made, how she thought about things, the research she did. There’s so much STUFF around Barbra Streisand, she is rarely asked the questions in interviews that I want asked. I also loved how she remembers every meal she ever had. And tells you where to get the best milk shakes up near Malibu, etc. I kind of never wanted it to end. My entire community of friends turned into an impromptu book club, asking each other “Have you gotten to this part yet?” “Where are you at in the book?”

7. Address Unknown, by Kathrine Kressmann Taylor
A brutally effective novella, in epistolary form. First published in 1938 in Story magazine, it caused a sensation, before lapsing into obscurity for almost an entire century. It’s finally been re-issued. The book is made up of the correspondence between two friends: a Jewish art dealer in San Francisco and his former business partner who moved back to Germany in 1932, excited about all the “democratic” reforms supposedly happening in the homeland. There is no outside narration. We only have the letters. The correspondence is filled with chit-chat, but the background noise is the rise of Nazism and then Hitler’s power-grab. It’s chilling. Taylor was urged to use the name “Kressmann Taylor” by the editor of Story, since it was thought too strong for a woman to be the author. The magazine sold out in record time. It is such an effective way to show brainwashing/propaganda, and to illustrate the dangers of state power. It’s heartbreaking but it also shows that you can’t just go on being “friends” with people who want to debate your right to exist. We live in a time where a lot of people are saying things like “Let’s have a debate about these political ideas!” Sure! But not if you are “for” rolling back my rights, or taking away the rights of others. Some things aren’t up for debate. Taylor witnessed German Americans turning on their Jewish neighbors. She saw how these poisonous ideas could not be compartmentalized. She saw the danger. The story was brought out in book form and published internationally. It was banned in Germany.

8. The Dud Avocado, by Elaine Dundy
I had never read this and I am in love with it. Dundy wrote what I consider to be one of the best books on Elvis Presley (and that’s a pretty crowded field), but I hadn’t branched out into her other work. The Dud Avocado is clearly loosely fictionalized, based on Dundy’s knockabout 20s. A slightly aimless young woman decides to head over to Europe to bum around. It’s the 1950s. She has friends, boyfriends, she trips around the streets of Paris, there are walks of shame, she gets caught up in the wrong crowd, but she finds the right crowd too. It’s funny, lively, and daring. It could have been written yesterday.

9. The End of Me, by Alfred Hayes
Last year I read his My Face for the World to See and felt excited to have discovered a new fave. The End of Me is even bleaker than My Face (which is saying something, since My Face for the World to See is very bleak). There’s a similarity to John Cheever here in that Hayes looks unblinkingly at things other men don’t want to face. He looks straight at the facts of his life, of being a man, of being a failure, of getting older, of losing your attractiveness, of feeling like life hasn’t somehow worked out the way you hoped. Norman Mailer, for example, could sometimes still pump himself up. Hemingway really stopped being ABLE to write when he stopped believing his own mythology. Men have different challenges than women, not lesser or worse, just different, particularly in the middle of the 20th century. I should clarify: white middle-aged men. Hayes nails a certain kind of loneliness and self-pity, a wild emptiness and loneliness, a hole that can never be filled. Men who are disappointing to others. Ouch. This is one of those Flâneur-type novels, with the main character wandering around the rainy New York streets, lost in a haze of memories and regrets, searching for something he will never find. Everything he wants is in the rear view mirror.

10. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, by James Joyce
This is probably my sixth time reading it. And it won’t be my last.

11. Basic Black with Pearls, by Helen Weinzweig
A haunting eerie book about a proper housewife, an “invisible woman”, in thrall to her lover Conrad, a mystery man who appears to be a high-level international spy. He leaves her cryptic messages which she then must decode, before flying off to meet him in Vienna. But he never seems to be there. His disguises are impenetrable. The writing is hypnotic, and so close-first-person, I started to question her reliability as a narrator. The affair is so fantastical I wondered if perhaps she was making it all up, create adventures for herself in her mind in order to combat the crushing boredom of a conventional life where she basically doesn’t exist except as a bored wife. I wondered if the book was really about psychosis, if her lover was a manifestation of her brain-wiring going wrong. Weinzweig doesn’t make it clear. The book is purposefully ambiguous, and totally devastating.

12. Screwball: The Life of Carole Lombard, by Larry Swindell
I read this biography in preparation for writing about Carole Lombard in my column at Liberties Journal.

13. The Uncollected Essays of Elizabeth Hardwick
I’m late to the Hardwick party and it’s been fun doing catch-up.

14. The Communist, by Guido Morselli
A depressing novel providing an intriguing look at post-WWII politics in Italy, as seen through the eyes Walter Ferranini, a deputy in the Italian parliament, a one-time follower of Mussolini, who then went to Spain to fight in the Civil War (not on Franco’s side, of course). The son of an anarchist, he is discouraged and depressed by the realities of Italian politics in the 1950s, and what has become of the Communist Party he has devoted his whole life to. The Communists turn on him, as they were wont to do. The Communists are puritanical, vindictive, demanding self-confessions, and basically shunning people who step out of line. Walter finds himself cut loose. He has never had a personal life. He sacrificed everything for politics. Without the Party, life has no meaning. Morselli’s life was difficult. He wrote constantly but only published two books in his lifetime. He committed suicide in 1973. This is a very serious book and it was painful to read: you can’t avoid the feeling that Walter has devoted his life to something empty, that he had bought a lie, and was now coming face to face with reality, with the wreckage of his dreams.

15. Table for Two, by Amor Towles
I love Amor Towles’ novels (Rules of Civility, A Gentleman in Moscow, Lincoln Highway) and so this collection of short stories was a blast. I read it in one sitting, trying to make myself slow down, but I couldn’t! Included in the collection is the novella Eve in Hollywood, starring Eve, the “lead” of Rules of Civility. Towles had, I believe, self-published this years ago, but it was impossible to get your hands on it. I was so excited to finally read it, and it didn’t disappoint. Eve in Hollywood is an old-fashioned Hollywood caper. What is it exactly Towles is doing? It’s hard to put my finger on it. All I know is I was so engrossed in Rules of Civility I missed my train stop, and I had to find a motel at midnight, which led me to Seekonk, Massachusetts. It was surreal, but that’s how good Towles is. The conductor announced my stop multiple times. I was lost to the world. I went to a talk he gave at the Coolidge in Brookline around the publication of Lincoln Highway. Highly recommend seeing him in person. I signed up for his newletter.

16. The Complete Poems, Philip Larkin
Another book which took me months. It’s the complete works. I read about a poem a day. It was a morning meditation. And he is not, how you say, a cheery read. He only published four volumes of poetry over his life, but, of course, his reputation is massive. I am only familiar with his most famous poems, “This Be the Verse”, “High Windows”, “Church Going”, so he’s always been someone I meant to explore more. Honestly, he’s tough. He sounds suicidal. This is not a judgment. Just an observation. There are certain lines that ring a gong in me – but the gong is so deeply buried (by design) – I don’t exactly want to hear from that particular gong. He’s tough. Not a pleasant man, but a brilliant poet.

Sexual intercourse began
In nineteen sixty-three(which was rather late for me)
-Between the end of the Chatterley ban
And the Beatles’ first LP.

17. Thomas Jefferson : Writings : Autobiography / Notes on the State of Virginia / Public and Private Papers / Addresses / Letters, Library of America
Another reading project that took me almost the full year. I have the Library of America volumes for Jefferson, Lincoln, Washington, and Hamilton. Never read any of them in their completion. I decided to just start this one morning, like “what the hell, let’s go for this.” I know no one will follow my advice – or who knows, maybe you will – but I do recommend taking this on. I took it slow. One can only take so much in one sitting.

18. Close-up on Sunset Boulevard: Billy Wilder, Norma Desmond, and the Dark Hollywood Dream, by Sam Staggs
I’ve read his other books (on All About Eve, on Streetcar Named Desire) but not this one. This year, I presented Sunset Boulevard at the Jacob Burns Film Center, and although I’ve seen the movie countless times – and absorbed the stories about it by osmosis – I had never sat down to do research. Most of this I already knew but it was fun.

19. Wild Heart, a Life: Natalie Clifford Barney’s Journey from Victorian America to the Literary Salons of Paris, by Suzanne Rodriguez
This was a rapturous reading experience. Natalie Clifford Barney was a rich American who lived an unconventional life (putting it mildly), moving to Paris at the turn of the 20th century, where she became one of the leading lights of the literary and artistic world, as well as queen of the lesbian scene. She intersected with everyone. Everyone. She was a siren. People were obsessed. She wrote, and hosted a famous salon, where everyone – everyone – showed up. People like her fascinate me. She had a powerful personality, obviously, but she also had such an independent spirit she recognized no outside rules or conventions. She lived for herself, she made her own rules. Not only is she an interesting person, the book is a great portrait of Belle Époque Paris.


Natalie Clifford Barney

20. Strangers on a Train, by Patricia Highsmith
I circle back to Patricia Highsmith’s novels on the regular. I move through them, and then just start again. I’ll keep doing this forever. They never get old. It’s incredible that this is her debut. What??

21. I Am Homeless If This Is Not My Home, by Lorrie Moore
Sometimes it’s tough being a fan of Lorrie Moore. She publishes so rarely! She makes you wait. She’s a master of the short story. Her writing is so unique, so distinctly hers. Who Will Run the Frog Hospital?, barely topping 160 pages, is her best novel, in my opinion. I Am Homeless If This Is Not My Home is her first novel in years. I am going to be honest. This was a tough read. The subject matter hit too close to home and I am not ready to deal with any of it yet. I will when it’s time. But not now.

22. Show Me The Magic: My Adventures in Life and Hollywood, by Paul Mazursky
Who has picked up Paul Mazursky’s torch? Was it even a torch? It was special, whatever it was. He was a product of his times, for sure, but these kind of finely observed social comedies for adults don’t really exist anymore. His memoir is mostly work-based, stories of film-making. He was a real bohemian. He tosses in some biographical details
– wife, kids – but they aren’t really the point.

23. The World Is Yours: The Story of Scarface, by Glenn Kenny
Glenn’s Made Men: The Story of Goodfellas was one of the books of 2020. Glenn is a pal of mine, and it’s so cool to see the successes of his recent books! I’m not a huge Scarface fan, but of course I know the movie intimately. If you went through an Al Pacino phase when you were studying acting in college, you watched Scarface on eternal repeat. Glenn got interviews with everyone (except, sadly, Pacino). Fantastic anecdotes from everyone. I can’t wait to see what movie Glenn tackles next.

24. Letters of Mary Shelley
This slim collection was originally published in 1911. Scanned in from Cornell University’s collection. Hence, no footnotes. Nothing to explain anything. Still: as first-person documents, these are incredible.

25. Jonathan Swift: Major Works
I wrapped up the Thomas Jefferson project and took up Jonathan Swift. I am intimately familiar with his most famous three – Gulliver’s Travels, Tale of a Tub, and Modest Proposal – oh, and some of his poems – but had never read the rest. This was another book that took me months to get through. I relied on the massive footnotes because satire is often incomprehensible outside the era in which it was written. He’s dazzling. Dazzlingly cranky.

26. Crackpot: The Obsessions of John Waters, by John Waters
I definitely needed to lighten the mood. I adore him.

27. Berlin Alexanderplatz, by Alfred Döblin
Of course I’ve seen the Rainer Werner Fassbinder mini-series and so the story was familiar, I knew where we were going. Never read the book before. Holy shit. This is a masterpiece. That’s my commentary.

28. Orwell: Essays
I’ve read all the books over and over again and have a smaller collection of his most famous essays (“Such Such Were the Joys”, “Politics and the English Language”, “Inside the Whale”, etc.) but had never read the complete works. The book is massive. He had his own column for years, where he wrote about living in wartime London, he reviewed books, etc. This was the reading experience of the year for me. I bought the Everyman Library edition. I’m a completist. I’ll revisit this book countless times.

29. Fatelessness, by Imre Kertész
I read his Liquidation last year. This one is loosely based on Kertész’s own harrowing experience being hauled away from his home as a teenager and sent to Auschwitz (and a series of other camps after that: amazingly Auschwitz was just a way-station for him). Hungary was “final days” for Germany’s reich, and was the beginning of the real end. He spent less than a year in the camps before being liberated, and then trying to make his way back home to Hungary. Brilliant and chilling book about a kid in an unimaginable situation.

30. From Here to the Great Unknown: A Memoir, by Lisa Marie Presley and Riley Keough
What an incredibly painful read. It tore at my heart. Death haunts the book. Riley Keough put the book together from the cassette tapes and notes her mother left behind. Riley adds her own commentary in between Lisa’s words, providing glimpses of her childhood, and what it was like for Riley – and Lisa’s other kids – during different periods. There was a lot here I hadn’t really known, or put together. The Scientology thing, for example. Priscilla was at her wits’ end and basically dropped Lisa Marie off at the Celebrity Center, sort of like “Here, you deal with her.” While this sounds horrifying, and it is (Priscilla doesn’t really come off well), for Lisa Marie it was freedom. She was left alone there. The Celebrity Center was a haven (as wild as that sounds), with all these rebel outlaw kids living in complete anarchy. It gave me a whole new perspective on Lisa Marie’s involvement with that “organization”. I cried a lot reading this book. I am so in awe of Riley for putting this together. I can’t even imagine how difficult this must have been for her.

31. Mary Shelley, by Miranda Seymour
A massive exhaustive biography. Her life doesn’t even seem possible. How could one person experience so much?

32. Small Things Like These, by Claire Keegan
I read this in preparation for reviewing the film (which I loved). I loved “Foster” (also adapted into a film, called The Quiet Girl, which I also reviewed). The criticisms of Small Things Like These – you can look it up – seem ridiculous to me. Not every story needs to be told in the same way. It’s not a history book. It’s the story of a man who has to make the decision to address an evil going on in his town (and everywhere in Ireland), and it’s against his nature to make a fuss, to “step in”. He’s not an activist or a hero. But he is a deeply moral man and he can’t forget what he has seen. Keegan’s style is light, not weighty. She doesn’t go on and on and on. She’s the opposite. Her stories are short. She gets so much done with less words.

33. Shakespeare’s Sonnets, edited by Stephen Booth
I learned of this edition of Shakespeare’s sonnets – and why it’s special – through Ron Rosenbaum’s book The Shakespeare Wars. This edition dates from the 1970s and was edited by Stephen Booth, and Rosenbaum gets fascinated by him – and by the notes in the back – and goes and interviews Booth. I got really really interested. So I bought this edition. I wrote about all of this way back in 2010. I read this entire edition – plus notes (some of which are 8, 9 pages long) – maybe 10 years ago? So I did it again this year. Here’s my process (and I would do one a morning):
— Read the sonnet out loud. Stay sharp and see what I notice about the language.
— Go through the notes. Flip back and forth between notes and sonnet to see what he’s pointing out.
— Read the sonnet again, out loud, with all the new knowledge I have just acquired.
What’s different about Booth is he has no interest in biographical speculation. The notes are language-based. He makes no “guesses” about what the sonnets “mean” overall. So this is an extremely rigorous experience of “close reading”. It’s good exercise for the brain. And once I got into the groove of it, I start to notice the patterns. I start to know what to look for. Any instance of the word “will” for example. Any mention of “eye” (think “I”). So once I’m in the swing of it, I can notice things myself, without even checking Booth’s notes. It’s super fun. A nice ritual for the morning.

34. Unacknowledged Legislation: Writers in the Public Sphere, Christopher Hitchens
There are a couple of older collections of his I haven’t read, this being one of them. This collection is made up of essays from late 90s up to 2000, so it’s a little bit eerie because they come from “the moment before”. There are two essays on Oscar Wilde, and essays on Hitchens’ regular subjects: P.G. Wodehouse, George Orwell, Rudyard Kipling, Philip Larkin. Percy Shelley said that poets were the “unacknowledged legislators of the world” so this collection is mostly about writers and poets. Again: it’s very 1999/2000.

35. James Joyce: A Life, by Edna O’Brien
I’d read this before and decided to re-read in preparation for interviewing filmmaker Sinéad O’Shea about her Edna O’Brien documentary. I remember Dad recommending this book to me. It’s short, it’s not Richard Ellmann’s doorstop of a Joyce bio (Joyce deserves a doorstop and Ellmann’s book is one of the greatest biographies of the 20th century.) O’Brien’s insights into what drove Joyce are invaluable, especially regarding his anger. “Anger” doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface. His was a total rejection. A firm “NO” to all of it. And only by saying “No” could he find his way to the “Yes” which closes out Ulysses. If you look at Ellmann’s book and feel intimidated by its length – well, first of all, you should read it anyway. But O’Brien’s much shorter bio might be an easier place to start.

36. The Picture of Dorian Gray, by Oscar Wilde
I am launching my new reading project which will take me into 2025: reading Oscar Wilde’s complete works. As should be obvious, considering my background, I know all of his major plays very well, have been in one of them, and quote them all the time. They are a part of me. I have read Dorian Gray probably 5 times. I have also read The Happy Prince, and then the big famous things, like “Ballad of Reading Gaol” and “De Profundis”. But I haven’t read any of his book reviews and the majority of his essays. Also his poetry. So I’m doing all of it – in as close to chronological order as I can do. Dorian Gray comes later in the timeline, but I wanted to launch my Wilde Year with this one. I’m excited.

37. Vera; Or the Nihilists, by Oscar Wilde
This is Oscar Wilde’s first play. He wrote it for an actress he loved and there were plans to put on a production but it was cancelled. I don’t think the actress was into it. I don’t blame her. It’s unbelievable to read Vera and try to connect it with the man who wrote, less than a decade later, Ideal Husband, Lady Windermere’s Fan … It takes place in Russia among a group of revolutionaries. Lots of fiery political speeches, and they all seem to be in earnest. (ahem) He based it on the life of revolutionary Vera Zasulich.

38. Part Of Our Time: Some Ruins And Monuments Of The Thirties, by Murray Kempton
I bought this because Christopher Hitchens reviewed it in the Unacknowledged Legislation. I was very intrigued. I had to buy it second-hand and it took weeks to arrive. This book is fascinating. It was written in 1955, and is a look at the last 40 years of the Left in America, focusing on a couple of different figures. It’s basically the journey of the radical Left from Sacco and Vanzetti to the HUAC. “Dashed hopes” is an understatement. I hadn’t heard of many of these people before, and it was really interesting to learn about them. I feel like there’s a lot of relevance to what we’re experiencing now. And it has added value since it was written by someone who participated in all of it, feels attached to it still, and is in the middle of a dark time – the HUAC times. So it’s written in-real-time. It’s not a historian’s view. It’s someone who knows many of the subjects he writes about personally.

39. Tolstoy, Rasputin, Others, and Me: The Best of Teffi, by Teffi
Teffi! I need to read her memoirs now. I laughed out loud a couple of times reading this charming (and yet still unsettling) collection. She was an establishment writer in pre-Revolutionary Russia: a famous person, a beloved figure, a social commentator and a humorist. Then of course everything changed and soon she was on the run. The things she wrote when she was on the run are haunting (many of them only published posthumously). The essay detailing her personal encounters with Rasputin – who gave her the creeps – is WILD.

40. Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime and Other Stories, by Oscar Wilde
I’d only read two of these stories in the collection: Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime and The Canterville Ghost. I wrote about the Charles Laughton adaptation of the second for Film Comment. I adore The Canterville Ghost. It makes me laugh out loud. The poor ghost, tormented by those twin boys, who ambush him nightly. And he just can’t terrorize the American family the way he would like. They refuse to be terrified of him and it’s so depressing for him!

41. The Searcher, by Tana French
I took a bit of a Tana French break and am coming back fresh. This is not an entry in her famous Dublin Homicide Squad series, although it takes place in Ireland. An ex-cop from Chicago buys an old house in a little town in Ireland and starts fixing it up. Before he knows it, he gets sucked into a local mystery, lured into curiosity by a 13 year old kid who asks for his help. Naturally the townspeople seem friendly on the surface but they have no patience for a “blow in” sticking his nose in where it doesn’t belong. (I remember being a kid during our visit to Achill Island, and my dad was talking to a guy who referred to his neighbors as “blow-ins” even though they moved to Achill 40 years before.)

42. Lost, Found, Remembered, by Lyra McKee
I’d been meaning to get to this collection of the murdered journalist’s work. Reading it made me sad and mad. She was an independent investigative reporter. She wrote about growing up in Northern Ireland, what it was like to have been born into “peacetime” (post-Good Friday Agreement), and all the problems still plaguing her generation, trauma passed down, hopelessness passed down. She wrote a lot about the epidemic of suicides among the youth. (Her piece called The Ceasefire Babies – which I read in The Atlantic in 2016 – was what first got my attention. I was like, “WHO is this young writer?”). She was just 29 years old when she was killed. RIP Lyra.

42. The Duchess of Padua, by Oscar Wilde
Dreadful! And it’s five acts! It’s interesting though because you can see what he’s trying to do. He is trying to write a play that a famous actress will want to do. Same with Vera. The male characters don’t rate at all. The women get 2-page-long speeches. He clearly wants to be a playwright. He is trying. The leap forward just five years later – into the plays that would make his reputation forevermore – plays that are being done, at all times, around the globe – is jaw-dropping. Somewhere on earth right now a company is doing Importance of Being Earnest. Many companies, more like. It’s being performed as we speak by 20 different community theatres across America. Across the continent another company is doing An Ideal Husband. Always. Oscar had to get Vera and The Duchess of Padua out of his system first.

43. The Happy Prince and Other Tales, by Oscar Wilde
“The Happy Prince” is a heartbreaking story, similar to “Giving Tree”, but coming out of the world of decadence/aesthetics. The golden statue is stripped bare of jewels. He once dazzled the eye. He ends up grey and shabby. I love that Rupert Everett named his movie about Oscar Wilde’s final years The Happy Prince. The fairy tale came early in Wilde’s writing work, but it was prophetic. The world would strip its author bare. Other touching stories: The Nightingale and the Rose, The Selfish Giant, The Devoted Friend (this one makes me so mad!), and The Remarkable Rocket, which is very funny. A hoity-toity egotistical firework device comes to an ignoble end.

44. The Yellow Wall-paper, by Charlotte Perkins Gilman
A work of genius. I first read the story in college and it rattled me. It was around the same time I tripped over Doris Lessing’s “To Room Nineteen”, which rattled me even more. I didn’t take a class in feminist literature. I just kind of stumbled over these things, doing what I do now, following the bread crumbs if I’m interested in something. (This is why there are major gaps in my education, which will take a lifetime to address). I was heavily into Margaret Atwood freshman/sophomore year in college, and read a couple of books about her work so maybe that’s where I heard about Yellow Wall-paper. As I’ve mentioned before, I’ve been on my own in terms of post-high-school education (outside of acting/theatre, etc.) You read The Yellow Wall-paper and you can instantly feel its importance. The voice – its present-tense diary-entry tone – is extremely unnerving since you are inside her madness as it develops. It’s a psychotic dream-world where the yellow wall-paper morphs before her horrified eyes. There are so many solutions: leave that damn room, divorce your husband, etc. (Which of course the real Charlotte Perkins Gilman did.) But the fictional character has absorbed the husband’s opinion of her (she is weak, she needs to rest), and has internalized the world’s conventions. The story has the feel of Gothic horror and in it you can feel the landscape which Shirley Jackson would explore 30, 40 years later.

45. A House of Pomegranates, by Oscar Wilde
Oscar Wilde wrote fairy tales which often had sad endings. “The Birthday of the Infanta” is very sad. “The Young King”, here, is not sad, but suffused with Christian imagery and a strong moral: this is not so much a fairy tale as a cautionary tale, a moral tale. A young king, who loves jewels and riches, has three dreams one night – where he is given visions of all the unpaid labor and misery that has gone in to providing him with jewels: the downtrodden people who dig the jewels, the seamstresses huddled over their work, etc. In a way, it’s very modern. The story is a critique of capitalism, although the words are never said – and wouldn’t be said. But “we” buy goods that were made in sweatshops far away, and we bear responsibility for that. We all participate. “The Fisherman and His Soul” is wild, and does not go where you expect it to go. It’s Little Mermaid-esque, but with a Soul wandering the earth, a Soul cut away from the Fisherman’s body. “The Star-Child” is about a foundling child grows up cruel and heartless. He discovers his parentage and is redeemed, and also made a King. He ruled over a peaceful land. The final sentence of the story tells us he died three years later and another King took over and he “ruled evilly”. So there rarely is a “happily ever after” in his stories, which is quite interesting. As I said, I am doing my best to approach this project chronologically. He has written two full plays, which weren’t successful at all, and there are other fragments in existence of other plays he started but did not finish. The plays are in the future. And in the very near future. I’ll get to them in 2025.

2024 tally
22 fiction
2 poetry
22 non-fiction
18 books by women
28 books by men
6 rereads
(I count by books, not author. If the same author appears multiple times, I count the author each time)
Countries represented: Ireland, America, England, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Germany

Previously
2023 books read
2022 books read
2021 books read
2020 books read
2019 books read
2018 books read
2017 books read
2016 books read
2015 books read
2014 books read
2013 books read
2012 books read
2011 books read
2010 books read
2009 books read
2008 books read
2007 books read
2006 books read
2005 books read

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Books, James Joyce | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

“Everything I know I taught myself.” — Bo Diddley

Bo Diddley was born in 1928, the son of sharecroppers. In 1979, he opened for the freakin’ Clash on their American tour. A lot of shit happened in between and it’s the story of the 20th century! Diddley had a mechanical mind and he built what he wanted to use, pushing technology forward into new arenas. If something didn’t produce the sound he wanted, then he would build whatever it was so he could get the right sound. He built his guitar. Which we saw on display at the Met. Instantly recognizable as his.

He built one of the first tremolo systems – out of old junk he found – literally scraps. Because of this, he sounded like nobody else. What he was doing was un-replicatable with the technology of the time. He stood out. And his sound still stands out. You’d never mistake his sound for anyone else’s.

I really appreciate Andrew Hickey’s 500 Songs podcast and his observation that the Everly Brothers took much of their guitar playing styles from Diddley. This obviously isn’t just HIS observation, but it’s where I first heard it. Diddley’s influence is hard to measure: he’s everywhere. Not too many people born in 1928 were touring with the Clash 50 years later. But I love the Everly Brothers and hadn’t clocked the “nod”, even though I should have, and now feel a little silly because it’s so obvious. There’s a heavy chug-a-chug sound in Diddley’s guitar, a choppy-chunking sound – repetitive, but it works beCAUSE it’s repetitive. This is the same sound the Everly brothers made. Diddley’s sound is so distinct it’s named for him – “the Bo Diddley beat.” Once you hear it, you can’t un-hear it. Found a great piece about the Bo Diddley Beat.

Diddley loved all music, gospel, country, rhythm and blues. You can hear the mix in all of his stuff. But he also wove in African folklore, Black American folklore/myths, vaudeville, inherited jokes … he brought it all into play. Like in “Say Man”. (You can hear his influence on Johnny Cash!)

His first hit was called …. “Bo Diddley”. (There are varying stories of how Elias Bates got his stage name. One intriguing theory is he named himself after Beau Diddley, a character in a Zora Neale Hurston story.) It’s the birth of the “Bo Diddley Beat”. He was signed to Chess records, so there was a lot of power and influence behind him. “Bo Diddley” was a hit. It still sounds like a hit. He performed it on the Ed Sullivan Show.

There’s a famous story about a confrontation Ed Sullivan and Diddley had backstage, when there was (understandable) confusion about what Diddley was going to perform on the show. The instructions were unclear. Diddley thought they wanted one thing, Sullivan and producers wanted another, and so when Diddley did his thing, it appeared to Sullivan et al as though he were going rogue. The confrontation was heated, and Diddley paid a price. Word got around. That clip is all we have of early Diddley. Chess got a little scared, and put their weight behind other performers … people who, presumably, wouldn’t scream at Ed Sullivan. It’s not fair. He was confused. I’d have been confused too. You tell me one thing, I assume what you mean, I follow your orders, and now you get pissed and say “that’s not what we meant”? Not fair.

His next hit was a monster – to this day – “I’m a Man”. The song was written in response to Muddy Waters’ “Hoochie Coochie Man”, a great record:

Diddley used a lot of the conceits, you can hear it in the lyrics, but musically he pared it down (and Waters’ was already pared down). Diddley got rid of as many chords as he could. It’s stripped bare. It’s just those main chords, the blues chord changes, over and over and over … and it has this tense feeling of inevitability, a power that builds and builds … There isn’t much to it. There doesn’t NEED to be “more to it”. Because LISTEN to this beast.

“I’m a Man” spawned a whole cottage industry of covers and responses. The song is a challenge (or, you can look at it as a challenge). Diddley declaring “I’m a man. M. A. N.” brought on reactions like, “Oh yeah? I’M the man.” The song was covered countless times and it’s one of the classic blues tracks – and that opening da-DA-duh-dum (chug- chug- chug) da-DA-duh-dum (chug chug chug) is sampled in more movies than I can even count. (In Paul Schrader’s great Blue Collar, the startling opening credits sequence is a work of art in and of itself, with shots of the factory work and workers – freeze framed – all timed to the opening song, Captain Beefhearts “Hard Workin’ Man,” where some of the accompaniment is the actual clanking of the machinery. The song is almost an exact duplication of “I’m a Man” – they didn’t want to pay Diddley for the rights. But you hear this, and you know the origin without even being told the story.

A lot of Diddley’s peers either died in obscurity or faded out, derailed by poverty or alcoholism or drugs. He was 10 years older than the rockabilly class, and his innovations inspired everyone. The British invasion couldn’t have happened without Diddley. Any little kid who wanted to be a guitarist in the 50s heard Diddley and tried to duplicate the sounds he was making. They failed. How is he doing that?? they agonized.

Well, he built his guitar to fit out of cigar boxes and wood. He built his own sound system. He cared about what he put out there, he cared about whatever he did: a song had HIS name on it. He was not an obedient employee. He was a mechanic and a seer. For him, it would be about the sound. It was always about the sound.

 
 
Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

Posted in Music, On This Day | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Carelessness on the part of revolutionaries has always been the best aid the police have.” — Victor Serge

Ever since my late-in-the-day discovery of Victor Serge (whose birthday it is today), a man I should have discovered much MUCH earlier, considering my interest in totalitarian regimes / dissident voices / revolution / Russia – I have read as much as I could. It’s the least I can do since Victor Serge was the man who first coined the term “totalitarian”.

You read the bare bones of Victor Serge’s life and a couple of things come to mind.

1. Let me get this straight: all of this happened to one man?

2. Okay so it all happened to him, fine. How did he find the time to write books?

Therein lies the mystery but it isn’t really a mystery. Serge spent the majority of his life on the run, from various murderous regimes. He was in a POW camp, he was exiled to Siberia, he was in prison many times, he fled, to France, and then to Mexico, clutching his notebooks in grubby bags, fearful of them being confiscated, which of course much of it was. His work told all the secrets of the Bolshevik power-grab, and it was even more powerful because he was one of them. He was viewed as an “apostate”, a “heretic”, a clue to the Messianic ideology.

And he may very well may be the first person (on record, at least) to recognize that the glorious Revolution was not only not going as planned, it was being crushed by the very people he fought alongside to bring about change. What was supposed to be a collective experience was – in actuality – the perfect set-up for the Strong Man. George Orwell saw this in the ’30s. Serge saw it in the early ’20s – extraordinary – and he saw it from within the Winter Palace. Extraordinary.

More about Victor Serge after the jump:

Continue reading

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment