R.I.P. Mary Oliver

Mary Oliver is so woven into the fabric of my life, I gasped when I heard the news she died. And I immediately thought of her poem “When Death Comes.”

When Death Comes

When death comes
like the hungry bear in autumn;
when death comes and takes all the bright coins from his purse

to buy me, and snaps the purse shut;
when death comes
like the measle-pox

when death comes
like an iceberg between the shoulder blades,

I want to step through the door full of curiosity, wondering:
what is it going to be like, that cottage of darkness?

And therefore I look upon everything
as a brotherhood and a sisterhood,
and I look upon time as no more than an idea,
and I consider eternity as another possibility,

and I think of each life as a flower, as common
as a field daisy, and as singular,

and each name a comfortable music in the mouth,
tending, as all music does, toward silence,

and each body a lion of courage, and something
precious to the earth.

When it’s over, I want to say all my life
I was a bride married to amazement.
I was the bridegroom, taking the world into my arms.

When it’s over, I don’t want to wonder
if I have made of my life something particular, and real.

I don’t want to find myself sighing and frightened,
or full of argument.

I don’t want to end up simply having visited this world.

It’s a weird thing. Mary Oliver is as successful a poet as you can get. Her stuff is “excerpted” through Pinterest, through Instagram … and if I hadn’t been into her already, and into her for years (I encountered her work via The New Yorker back in the 1990s) I might have been turned off by this. You know, the Oprah-fication quote-worthy cross-stitch feeling of it. Like, if it’s THIS popular, it’s probably not all that good. But her stuff strikes a chord. I’m sure you’ve all probably read her poem “Wild Geese” – that’s the one that starts with the line “You do not have to be good.” It’s everywhere.

Wild Geese

You do not have to be good.
You do not have to walk on your knees
for a hundred miles through the desert repenting.
You only have to let the soft animal of your body
love what it loves.
Tell me about despair, yours, and I will tell you mine.
Meanwhile the world goes on.
Meanwhile the sun and the clear pebbles of the rain
are moving across the landscapes,
over the prairies and the deep trees,
the mountains and the rivers.
Meanwhile the wild geese, high in the clean blue air,
are heading home again.
Whoever you are, no matter how lonely,
the world offers itself to your imagination,
calls to you like the wild geese, harsh and exciting –
over and over announcing your place
in the family of things.

But … just because something is everywhere doesn’t mean it’s not good. The critical world kind of ignored her, even though she won the Pulitzer, her books were (are) literal best-sellers, etc. She is a well-loved contemporary poet. Like a Robert Frost of our time. Another thing that added to the general critical dismissal of her is that her poems are not “topical.” She writes nature poems, basically. You read her stuff and you get the feeling that she spent the majority of her time taking long walks. Then came home and wrote a poem about the ocean, or sunflowers, or whelks. This isn’t seen as “important.” It’s old-fashioned, a lady poet writing about flowers. I don’t mean that I AGREE with this assessment. I just mean that that’s the assessment that seemingly was out there. This New Yorker article is really intereseting about Mary Oliver and her detractors as well as her fans.

If you love Mary Oliver, as I do, you love her passionately.

There’s always a moment when her poems flash into transcendence, like when a gliding swan suddenly rears back stretching out its wings. It has that feeling to it.

Whelks

Here are the perfect
fans of the scallops,
quahogs, and weedy mussels
still holding their orange fruit —
and here are the whelks —
whirlwinds,
each the size of a fist,
but always cracked and broken —
clearly they have been traveling
under the sky-blue waves
for a long time.
All my life
I have been restless —
I have felt there is something
more wonderful than gloss —
than wholeness —
than staying at home.
I have not been sure what it is.
But every morning on the wide shore
I pass what is perfect and shining
to look for the whelks, whose edges
have rubbed so long against the world
they have snapped and crumbled —
they have almost vanished,
with the last relinquishing
of their unrepeatable energy,
back into everything else.
When I find one
I hold it in my hand,
I look out over that shaking fire,
I shut my eyes. Not often,
but now and again there’s a moment
when the heart cries aloud:
yes, I am willing to be
that wild darkness,
that long, blue body of light.

Gannets

I am watching the white gannets
blaze down into the water
with the power of blunt spears
and a stunning accuracy —
even though the sea is riled and boiling
and gray with fog
and the fish are nowhere to be seen,
they fall, they explode into the water
like white gloves,
then they vanish,
then they climb out again,
from the cliff of the wave,
like white flowers —
and still I think
that nothing in this world moves
but as a positive power —
even the fish, finning down into the current
or collapsing
in the red purse of the beak,
are only interrupted from their own pursuit
of whatever it is
that fills their bellies —
and I say:
life is real,
and pain is real,
but death is an imposter,
and if I could be what once I was,
like the wolf or the bear
standing on the cold shore,
I would still see it —
how the fish simply escape, this time,
or how they slide down into a black fire
for a moment,
then rise from the water inseparable
from the gannets’ wings.

She has put voice to things I haven’t been able to even properly FEEL because the experience of whatever it is is so confusing. Or you resist looking at something. You resist facing something. She writes about death, and loss, and grief. Terribly traumatic experiences. But she does so in a way that gives those feelings a container, a space where the words can form and so you, the reader, can look at it and say, “Oh my God, yes. That is how I feel.” It’s deeply healing. There aren’t too many poets who have written poems that I cling to in tough times. Off the top of my head I can think of only three, Yeats, Auden and Mary Oliver. Each of these poets have written poems I have memorized, not from trying to memorize the poem, but from sheer repetition of reading, the sheer amount of times I have gone back again and again to their work.

I have written a lot about Auden’s “The More Loving One” and what it means to me, the relationship I have had with it, which now stretches back to high school when I first encountered it. That poem has been there for me. I have wrestled with it. I have accepted it. I have argued with it. I have rejected it in a tantrum. I wrote this insane essay over 10 years ago here called “The Total Dark Sublime” – the title taken from “The More Loving One” – and that essay was me wrestling with the poem and what it was telling me to do. Or … not what it was telling me to do, but just telling me this is the way things ARE. It’s one of those crazy essays I used to write, which sometimes I think, “Uhm, maybe delete that?” But oh well, will let it stand. Like, this is a lifelong relationship with a poem. Mary Oliver’s “In Blackwater Woods” is another poem like that for me. It holds such a special place in my heart it deserves to be called sacred. It has provided something for me, something I have NEEDED, something I keep forgetting (because forgetting is the human condition), something that has helped. It doesn’t help in a “everything will be okay” way, because the poem doesn’t say that at ALL (and I wouldn’t buy it if it did. Sell that shit to someone else. Everything is not and WILL not “be okay.”)

My Dad was not familiar with Mary Oliver’s work and so one day I recited “In Blackwater Woods” for him. I knew it by heart. In the last 2 stanzas, I heard him exhale – a whoosh of breath – and he said, “Boy, that’s a great poem.” If you knew Dad, you would know his reaction was a big deal. He was a deeply emotional man, but he tried to keep it in check. When he felt something, it was obvious in a 10-mile radius.

Years later, when we stood in a small fragile grieving group to bury his ashes, we each said something beforehand. Memories or thoughts. I read this poem. The connective tissue between reciting it for him and then reading it out loud in the vast absence he left behind was so strong I thought I might not be able to get through it. I also had no idea when I first recited it to him that it would end up being about my own feelings of loss when he left us.

In Blackwater Woods

Look, the trees
are turning
their own bodies
into pillars

of light,
are giving off the rich
fragrance of cinnamon
and fulfillment,

the long tapers
of cattails
are bursting and floating away over
the blue shoulders

of the ponds,
and every pond,
no matter what its
name is, is

nameless now.
Every year
everything
I have ever learned

in my lifetime
leads back to this: the fires
and the black river of loss
whose other side

is salvation,
whose meaning
none of us will ever know.
To live in this world

you must be able
to do three things:
to love what is mortal;
to hold it

against your bones knowing
your own life depends on it;
and, when the time comes to let it go,
to let it go.

This is what poets can do, at their most transcendent. They are muses, voices. They speak when we cannot. They see farther and deeper. Their ability to put experience into words helps beyond measure. It helps create a container for our lives, for our understanding of our lives.

Mary Oliver did that for me, more than any other living poet.

Posted in RIP, writers | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Review: The Heiresses (2019)

I absolutely loved the Paraguayan film The Heiresses. It’s my kind of movie. Incredible lead performance from an actress who has extensive stage experience but this is her first film. Mind-boggling.

I reviewed The Heiresses for Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: Touch Me Not (2018)

For a movie so filled with sex, I was left kinda cold by this. I reviewed Touch Me Not for Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

R.I.P. drummer Honey Lantree

Even now, a “girl drummer” in an all-boy band is a rare thing. Back in the 1960s, it was unheard of. Which is why Honey Lantree, drummer for the Joe Meek-produced The Honeycombs, stands out. Still. Lantree just died at the age of 75. When she joined the band, she was working as a hairdresser. She had never played the drums before, but she took to it. She learned quickly. People refused to even believe it. People thought she was “pretending” drumming to a track already laid down. I know, it’s outrageous.

I wrote a tiny bit about The Honeycombs’ biggest hit – “Have I the Right?” – here. It was #1 in the UK, and #5 in the United States. The Honeycombs didn’t “go the distance” as a band, they were a one-hit wonder, but people still remember that song. It’s an ear-grabber for sure.

Interestingly enough, just last month Honey Lantree came up in a discussion on Facebook. Someone linked to the Elvis talk I gave in Memphis, in which I referenced the absolutely BONKERS final moment of Spinout. Someone in the comments section, a woman, posted a picture of Elvis’ “band” in Spinout, all boys, with – a girl drummer. A spunky sassy one-of-the-boys girl drummer.

I said, in response, “Hey, it’s like The Honeycombs” and the woman who posted the Spinout pic said, “The girl drummer in Spinout and Honey Lantree inspired me as a kid to become a drummer.” Karen Carpenter also said that when she saw The Honeycombs on The Ed Sullivan Show, it inspired her to become a drummer.

One-hit wonder? Okay. But you never know “how far that little candle throws his beams.”

R.I.P. Honey Lantree.

Here are The Honeycombs performing “Have I The Right?”:

Posted in Music, RIP | 4 Comments

Fosse/Verdon: first teaser trailer

Starring Sam Rockwell as Bob Fosse and Michelle Williams as Gwen Verdon. I’ve been excited about this since I first heard it was happening last year, and here’s the first glimpse.

I’m so psyched about this that I’m almost scared. Intensity of anticipation means a high risk of disappointment. But I LOVE that state. That’s what art and entertainment are all about. RISKS. EMOTIONS.

Watching that trailer, you see glimpses of everything – moments from All That Jazz, Cabaret … the dance Fosse and Verdon did in Damn Yankees … and it’s looking … pretty damn good, I have to say.

Posted in Television | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Review: Communion (2019; directed by Anna Zamecka)

This Oscar-contending documentary from Polish filmmaker Anna Zamecka is amazing, even more so considering it is her first film. It opens today.

I reviewed Communion for Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Review: Into Invisible Light (2019; directed by Shelagh Carter)

“Do you ever feel your life just veered off somewhere?” – Helena Grayson, Into Invisible Light

In her first film, Passionflower, Winnipeg-based filmmaker Shelagh Carter delved into her own past. Seen through the watchful eyes of young Sarah (Kassidy Love Brown), Passionflower depicts a childhood shadowed by an advertising-agent father (Darcy Fehr) and a mother (Kristen Harris), who is rapidly deteriorating with an undiagnosed and unnamed mental illness. Sarah absorbs it all: her parents’ marital strife, the mercurial pendulum-swing of her mother’s behavior, the isolation of growing up in a house with a mad mother. The film takes place in the Mad Men era of ad-men and cocktail parties, tail-finned cars and frustrated women, and Carter’s film shows the maelstrom of confusing influences bombarding the child’s psyche. It was an impressive debut. (I interviewed Carter about Passionflower, and I also interviewed lead actress Kristen Harris.) Carter’s second feature was the award-winning and emotionally harrowing Before Anything You Say, starring, again, Darcy Fehr and Kristen Harris as a married couple locked in mortal combat. Although other characters appear, this is a two-person show, with the back-and-forth of buried resentments coming to the surface, old hurts, fears of abandonment, secrets and lies. (I interviewed Carter about Before Anything You Say, for which she won Best Director at the International Filmmaker Festival of World Cinema, Berlin, as well at the International Filmmaker Festival of World Cinema, Milan.)

Carter’s third feature, the melancholic Into Invisible Light, has a large cast (larger than her other two films), and is a puzzle-piece film about the dreams and desires, hopes and disappointments of a group of characters with intersecting relationships and fraught past involvements. The central character is Helena Grayson, played by the superb Jennifer Dale (who also co-wrote the script with Carter). Helena is a recent widow, now in charge of the artistic endowment established by her late husband. She feels unqualified to walk in her husband’s footsteps. Her enforced engagement with art, sculpture, dance, writing, picking and choosing the candidates for consideration, brings up old ambitions, and memories of her own writing, done long ago before marriage and its complications seemingly obliterated all that. She had thought she “put away childish things”. Michael (Peter Keleghan) teaches literature at a local university, and is married to a woman who protects her independence ferociously, going off on hiking trips for weeks on end, leaving him to single-parent their teenage daughter Monica (Jaydee-Lynn McDougall), a dance student hopeful for a scholarship handed out by the aforementioned artistic endowment. Years ago, lifetimes ago, Michael and Helena had a romance, young people bound together by their love of words and writing, and support of one anothers’ young dreams.

These four characters are at the center of the intricate and thoughtful script.

Accompanied by Shawn Pierce’s beautiful original score, a haunting piano which infuses the film with an elegiac yearning, Carter explores the past and present of these intense characters, using a variety of arresting stylistic choices.

Cinematographer Ousama Rawi (who also shot Before Anything You Say) has an intuitive sense of space and light, showing Helena strolling through ornate offices and gigantic museums, the surrounding space and high ceilings making this prickly powerhouse look lost and defenseless, in stark contrast to her competent and verbally intimidating persona.

One of the components of Into Invisible Light is its melding of past and present, Helena flowing backwards into the past (shot in dreamy black-and-white, black-and-white with a dark greenish-blue tint), where white curtains billow, where her mother lies dying, where her family stands around a grave, where her hand hovers over a pen on her desk. These are poetic thematic choices, highlighting the Chekhovian elements of the script. Chekhov, in plays like The Three Sisters, The Cherry Orchard, Uncle Vanya, wrote about people caught in the past, bubbles of life trapped in amber, with no way out except through their long-held dreams. Helena and Michael re-enter their old relationship, awkward and fumbling, and yet passionate, the feelings still intense, as though no time has passed at all. Meanwhile the teenage Monica is shown again and again in a rehearsal studio, launching her body in dramatic slo-mo across the space, arms flung out, head thrown back … visual sequences of depth and power. And yet Monica is vulnerable too. She has been abandoned by the adults meant to protect her. (There are a couple of extremely frightening scenes showing the consequences of this abandonment.)

The intense – even fraught – flashbacks emanate from Helena’s unconscious, from her memory, interrupting her present, filling her mind’s eye and heart (similar to the way flashbacks are used in Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman.) Things Helena had assumed were dead in her, things she had buried long ago, arise. Some of the things are terrible, and some tremble with beauty and fragile hope. Dale navigates this with assurance, Helena’s glamorous competent exterior, but also what the exterior is designed to cover up. There’s a wonderful scene where she joins Michael at a quiet club, with wood-paneled walls and leather armchairs, and over the course of their conversation she has too much to drink. Her mask falls away. She wants him. She wants him now, she is lonely, but she also wants him because he reminds her of who she was back then, with him. This scene is beautifully played by Dale. Drawn to Michael again, drawn to literature again through him, she starts to feel the ground beneath her feet once more, all while her past still rises, the constant presence of long white curtains billowing around her as she moves back into memory.

The best way I can put it is that Into Invisible Light is a movie for grownups. It’s not about the first flush of hope. It’s a movie about flawed human people with some miles on them, miles where things have been dropped along the way, things they all thought were lost forever. The dialogue is spiky sometimes, and also really fun to listen to. It’s a relief to sink into a script confident in its different voices, feeling no obligations towards kitchen-sink realism. These are articulate people, devoted to language. They use language to deflect, to camouflage. There’s a real script here, and each scene creates its own intense little microcosm. There’s momentum in the plot, to be sure, but the plot is not really “the thing.” What is “the thing” here is a mood, a vibe, an overall style meant to call up emotions and thoughts and memories. This is difficult to pull off, without seeming precious or like the film is tiptoeing around committing, to nailing things down. Carter collaborates well with Rawi (and they are aided in their work by talented editor Chad Tremblay, who won Best Editing at the Madrid International Film Festival for Before Anything You Say). The music ties the whole thing together, grounding it and yet also setting it free.

When Monika launches herself across the dance floor, lost in her creativity, in her expression, watched by Helena, the childless Helena, there’s an emotional impact flowing from all that came before, flowing without pushing, pieces of the puzzle put together gently, and yet still … still … imperfectly. Because life is like that sometimes. Because things aren’t perfect, things don’t work out perfectly. There are no “happy endings.” But there can be peace, there can be joy, even if momentary, and dreams aren’t lost forever if you drop them on the road of life. You can go back and find your way into them, find your way back into the light.

“Into Invisible Light” opens in Canada on January 9th. Keep your eyes peeled for streaming release dates.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

December 2018 Viewing Diary

Swimming with Men (2018; d. Oliver Parker)
A rather slight little comedy about men forming a synchronized swimming team. I reviewed for Ebert.

Zama (2018; d. Lucrecia Martel)
One of the best films of the year (I saw it after I submitted my Top 10s. I got behind in viewing, I couldn’t help it. Too much to see!) It was in Film Comment’s Top 10, which was very exciting.

Don’t Look Now (1074; d. Nicolas Roeg)
Roeg died in December, and Film Comment asked me to write a tribute (which is in the Jan/Feb 2019 issue, as well as online). This is the movie of his I know best, and its creepiness never fails to get under my skin. It’s an extremely unnerving film. That opening sequence! The way Roeg put it together. It’s so bold. It breaks SO MANY RULES. Roeg’s like “Rules shmules.”

Vox Lux (2018; d. Brady Corbet)
I can’t stop thinking about this movie. I reviewed for Ebert. I read some article where the writer talked about how the movie showed pop music’s healing properties, how in the final scene it shows how pop music brings a community together, how the movie’s attitude was the antithesis of the “anti-pop-music” attitude of A Star is Born. I read the article and thought, like the black-hearted bitch that I am, “You have got to be kidding me.”

Performance (1970; d. Nicolas Roeg and Donald Cammell)
After years as a cinematographer, Roeg became a director with this. And what a debut. There is nothing else like this movie. How could there be? Very much looking forward to participating in a discussion about this movie following its screening on January 10th and the IFC Center.

The Witches (1990; d. Nicolas Roeg)
I hadn’t watched this movie since it came out. It is so disturbing.

Happy as Lazarro (2018; d. Alice Rohrwacher)
My God, this movie. One of the movies of the year. I don’t even know how Rohrwacher pulled this off. Wrote about it briefly here.

Shirkers (2018; d. Sandi Tan)
In my Top 10. Wrote about it here.

Documenting Hate: New American Nazis (2018)
A Frontline episode on PBS. I’m so angry at what has been happening, what continues to happen.

The Man Who Fell to Earth (1976; d. Nicolas Roeg)
A haunting film. And Elvis is involved. Because of course. If you are an alien who falls to earth, if you don’t watch Elvis movies, there’s no hope for you. You want to understand our planet? You have to understand Elvis. (Also, there is the fact that 1. David Bowie and Elvis share a birthday. 2. David Bowie and Elvis were both the #1 singers on RCA, except in different generations.

Hale County, This Morning This Evening (2018; d. RaMell Ross)
This also made the Film Comment Top 10, which is thrilling. One of the documentaries of the year (and it was an extremely strong year for documentaries.) I wrote a little bit about the film here.

Intervention, a couple of Season 16 episodes
They haven’t changed the format since it started. It works. One of the strengths of the show is its sense of realism about addiction, and those final sometimes devastating credit lines: “so and so relapsed.” or “so and so has been sober since …” or “so and so is now living with [terrible drug addict boyfriend” … No easy fix. Getting clean is hard.

Roma (2018; d. Alfonso Cuaron)
Jen and I went to go see this at the IFC Center. It was my second time seeing it. It’s overwhelming. It was also great to feel Jen responding to it next to me. She dissolved into sobs during one scene. If you’ve seen the movie, you’ll probably know what scene.

Walkabout (1971; d. Nicolas Roeg)
An international sensation. It’s been years since I saw it. Wonderful to revisit.

Sweet Bird of Youth (1989; d. Nicolas Roeg)
What a treat this was. I saw it on TV when it first aired. I knew the script by heart, practically, as well as the original movie starring Paul Newman and Geraldine Page. Elizabeth Taylor is fantastic as “The Princess.” Page made her name playing the role, and it could be seen as definitive, I suppose. But there are many ways to approach things. Taylor used her own “way in” and it all made perfect sense. She was funny and sad and sexually desperate and occasionally biting in her wit and self-awareness.

Bad Timing (1980; d. Nicolas Roeg)
Theresa Russell’s performance … Good Lord in heaven is it good. She was only 23 years old. If Nicolas Roeg hadn’t come along, and saw something else in her besides “hot blonde” … who knows what would have happened. This is an unbelievable performance. Very upsetting movie.

Track 29 (1988; d. Nicolas Roeg)
This movie is WACKO. I don’t think I had seen it before. I tracked it down in preparation for my Nicolas Roeg tribute in Film Comment. With Theresa Russell again, as a bored housewife with a Southern accent, who sleeps in a bedroom surrounded by her dolls. There’s a kind of 29 Wagons Full of Cotton thing going on here. She’s married to none other than Christopher Lloyd, who is obsessed with his model train set, and can’t be bothered to pay attention to her. Into this mix comes Gary Oldman, a mysterious stranger who materializes – literally – by the side of the road, and seeks out Russell, claiming to be the child she gave up for adoption years before. She and Oldman are almost the same age, though, so you wonder what else might be going on here. The movie goes off the rails. Just like Christopher Lloyd’s beloved train set. It’s INSANE. Young actresses today, for the most part, are not willing to go where Theresa Russell went in her work. Or maybe they’re not able to. Or maybe the roles just aren’t being written, and therefore the actresses don’t develop those skills. Women now are supposed to be empowering role models or “badasses” or walk around with “agency”. What about humanity? What about the ugliness of life and love? What about pain and sorrow and desperation and making HUGE mistakes and behaving badly? This is where Russell LIVES and I DIG IT.

Supernatural, Season 14, episode 8 “Byzantium” (2018; d. Eduardo Sánchez)
This moment below … I was like, “What the hell are those people smoking over there? Castiel laughing like this? In what freakin’ world? Stop reading fan forums and fan fic. This is fan fic, not the show. Jesus GOD just understand the damn characters you’re writing. Keep some consistency.” That being said: Veronica Cartwright was fantastic.

Minding the Gap (2018; d. Bing Liu)
Wonderful documentary. I wrote a little bit about it here.

Mindhunter, Season 1 (2018; d. David Fincher, and others)
I re-watched the whole thing. I am looking forward to Season 2. It’s deeper than I first perceived. It’s not just about setting up the Behavioral Science Unit. It’s really about men. The certainty of men. The entitlement of men. But the WAY it’s about these things is really subtle. There’s a cloud of plausible deniability around it (just like there is in the book). I can’t wait for Season 2.

Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath (Season 3 episodes, so far)
This woman. THIS WOMAN. HERO. HERO. I can’t even believe where she’s going in Season 3. I mean, I believe it, but I still – as a long-time critic – have moments of disconnect where I think, “She’s actually daring to go HERE?” I admire her so much.

Deadwood, Season 2, episodes 1 – 6
Okay, okay, so now I know what the fuss was all about. The kidney stone episode was unbearable. Even now, I think about it, and shiver with revulsion. I was screaming, “NO. NO. NO.” However, it did make me think: we human beings are tough motherfuckers. Look at all we have endured for MILLENNIA before modern meds came around. We are stronger than we know.

Supernatural, Season 14, episode 9 “The Spear” (2018; d. Amyn Kaderali)
It’s weird. It’s almost like the Uncanny Valley Effect. Even in moments that sorta work, you still know somewhere … “Something is really really off.” I’m so bummed. I coulda used the escape of this show over the last wretched two years. They let me down.

Last Tango in Paris (1973; d. Bernardo Bertolucci)
Charley and I went to go see it at The Quad. After all the chatter around the film, especially in the wake of Bertolucci’s death, it was good to engage with the actual thing. When things become too abstract, I lose interest. I want to engage with the thing, whatever it is. It’s okay if you don’t feel the same way. I wish people would return the favor. I’ve seen this movie so many times, the first time when I was a teenager and in the first flush of my Brando phase. Even then, as a 14, 15 year old, I felt its mournfulness. For me, it was all about the grief and the sadness, the wellspring from which every single thing happens in the film. It’s still that way for me. And she is a survivor. He goes down with the ship. She knows enough to get out when she’s had enough. Brando gives one of the great all-time performances. Maybe even the greatest. Nobody else could do it. It’s all him.

The Innocent Man (2018)
A true crime mini-series on Netflix, based on a John Grisham book (a non-fiction book). I thought it was really good.

The Destroyer (2018; d. Karyn Kusama)
I reviewed for Ebert. The whole movie was basically about Nicole Kidman’s makeup job.

Girl (2018; d. Lukas Dhont)
I am reviewing this one for Ebert.

What Happened Was… (1994; d. Tom Noonan)
I’ve been wanting to write about this GREAT movie for years. I actually did write something already, but it was a million eons ago and it’s time to re-visit.

McQueen (2018; d. Ian Bonhôte)
A devastating (and informative) documentary about fashion designer Alexander McQueen. I was so upset by this film.

The Magnificent Ambersons (1942; d. Orson Welles)
Everyone knows the story about Ambersons, how the studio took it away from Welles, and re-cut it, ruining it (in Welles’ opinion). The original Welles-cut is the Holy Grail of cinema. HOWEVER. The re-cut version is also, in my opinion, something of a masterpiece. It’s heartbreaking, detailed, character-driven and yet also … its themes are enormous: progress, America, technology, ethical concerns, ambition … It’s gigantic. I love this film. It’s been a very Welles-heavy year and I’m so happy about it.

The House That Jack Built (2018; d. Lars Von Trier)
After all THAT, after all the controversy and outrage (from many who had not even seen the film yet) … I absolutely loved it. Matt Dillon is great, his best in years. And LVT is his typical provoking self. Sometimes you’re like, “Oh, come ON, Lars, REALLY??” but that’s part of what you get if you get into him. The movie is funny, too. Someone on Facebook expressed surprise that I had liked it. Well, I’m on record loving LVT, and with taking him seriously as an artist, even as he drives me crazy, which he often does. Don’t make assumptions about me, please. Or at least read more of my work before you assume I will or will not like something. I think Melancholia is one of the best movies of the last 30 years. I loved the Nymphomaniac series. I’m still not on board with Breaking the Waves. He’s very difficult. Sometimes enraging. But I think he’s major, and I think his work is worth grappling with. There’s much to grapple. It’s even fun to argue with him. This is a nutty movie. Footage of Glenn Gould playing the piano is involved, for example.

Out of the Blue (1980; d. Dennis Hopper)
This movie is streaming on Amazon. It’s such an important movie. Linda Manz as a punk-rock and Elvis-obsessed teenager, trying to deal with her life, her ex-con dad (Hopper), her floozy junkie mom (Sharon Ferrell). There’s a bleak nihilistic atmosphere and the film has the courage of its convictions. That final scene! There are many “Elvis haunted” movies. Out of the Blue is #1 on that list.

Murder By Numbers (2002; d. Barbet Schroeder)
Prompted by a conversation on Twitter. In my opinion, this is Sandra Bullock’s best performance. (I referenced it in my review for Destroyer. Bullock is playing a similar character, and yet she doesn’t try to over-play it with a zombie-like makeup job. It’s all in her acting.) This was the first moment I noticed Ryan Gosling. My reaction was: “Holy shit, who is THAT.”

North Dallas Forty (1979; d. Ted Kotcheff)
Such a good film. With such a good performance from Nick Nolte at its center. It’s launched a Nick Nolte retrospective at Chez Sheila. I wrote about one of Nick Nolte’s acting moments – and Nick Nolte, in general.

Posted in Monthly Viewing Diary, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

For Film Comment: In Memorian: Nicolas Roeg

The first piece of 2019: an essay on the late Nicolas Roeg in the Jan/Feb 2019 issue of Film Comment. (The piece is also online).

Posted in Directors, RIP | Tagged | Leave a comment

2018 in a nutshell

Happy New Year.

Posted in Personal | Leave a comment