Conversation With a Memphis Pimp

In 2013, I had a half-hour long conversation with a lovely pimp in Confederate Park. Flanked by cannons with a gigantic statue of Jefferson Davis in the background. Because it’s the South and everything is fucked up. The pimp was extremely nice and respectful, and I enjoyed talking with him. He didn’t tell me he was a pimp right off the bat, it came out naturally in conversation. He was wearing a tan suit with a slight check in it, and a fashionable winter coat. He looked like a million bucks. The conversation started simply with a “Good morning, how are you” and we took it from there. Once I told him my name, he referred to me as “Miss Sheila” with an old-world elegant air.

Here are some of the things the pimp said to me. Much of this was unprompted.

“There is nothin’ in this world, n-o-t-h-i-n-g, like a mohair suit, I am telling you.”

“I am 64 years old and I enjoy every minute of my life. Of course, I’ve been smokin’ weed all day so I’m feelin’ very good.”

Pimp: “You’re beautiful.”
Me: “Back off.”
Pimp: “No, no, I’m off-duty, come on now. Just tellin’ the truth.”

“Women are beautiful in all sizes but there is no reason for a woman to be big as a water buffalo, if you’ll excuse me, Miss Sheila.”

“My mama died at 88. She had dementia, bless her soul. I was more sad when she was in the nursing home than when she died.”

“I would buy a new Cadillac every six months. Only Cadillacs, you know it!”

“A man can face any trouble in the world, any trouble at ALL, Miss Sheila, if he’s wearing a camel hair coat.”

“You may not believe this from lookin’ at me, but I am half-Irish. Yes, ma’am, I am.”

Me: “You Southerners are not messing around. Y’all are a bunch of Jesus Freaks.”
Pimp: (roaring with laughter) “THAT IS THE TRUTH, MISS SHEILA.”

“I was a good pimp. I let my women keep their own jewelry if it was heirloom shit. I gave them milk baths.”

“Some good-for-nothin’ burned my damn house down.”

“Beale Street changed the world, Miss Sheila.”

“You’ll have to excuse me but I lost my lower bridge somewhere.”

“I been all over this world. But when you’re hungry and cold, there is no place like a Southern town. They take you in and feed you.”

“Miss Sheila, let me tell you, if you don’t do what you love in this life, then life is not worth living.”

During my walks around the city, I had been thinking a lot about the seedy glamour of Memphis, its faded grandeur, and empty streets filled with ghosts. I figured I’d go to the source.

I asked him, “So lemme ask you. What is Memphis really like?”

He thought for half a second and then replied, emphatically, “Memphis is a no-good dirty town full of redneck crackers.”

Posted in Personal | Tagged | 2 Comments

A Maestro on the Fender Stratocaster

billyhector

We went to see Billy Hector play last night, a New Jersey blues guitar legend. His guitar-playing is out of this world, and his guitar was vintage, battered, well-used, gorgeous. His playing ranges from dreamy, his fingers sliding up and down the strings in great swoons of sound, to rough and hard and aggressive, almost metal. However you describe it, it’s rock ‘n’ roll. He did a version of Vince Guaraldi’s Peanuts Christmas Dance song that was to die for! People dancing, having a great time. It was a hell of a show.

Posted in Music | Leave a comment

Shimmering Manhattan

Yesterday, I had to replace my Mac AirPort (a dinosaur, which suddenly crapped out after 7 years of faithful service), and then I was going to meet friends for drinks at the legendary Algonquin Hotel. There’s an Apple store in Grand Central, so, despite dreading being in the midst of a rush-hour crowd, I headed across town to Grand Central. And yes, the crowds were fierce. But there’s something about that building … I know commuters rush through there on a daily basis, and so perhaps they are somewhat “over” their surroundings since they see it all the time. I, however, almost never go through there. As a matter of fact I avoid it, because of the crowds. Yesterday, the rushing crowds (holiday and otherwise) added to my sense of the building as this glorious and long-standing hub of action, a funnel through which thousands of people flow every single day. It also was festive and magical.

And then, of course, there is the CONCOURSE. With that dreamy green ceiling, with golden constellations, and pin-prick star-light shining through. Heaven. (Literally.)

I got my new AirPort in no time flat and then had about 15 minutes to linger. Which I did. I leaned over the balcony and soaked up the sights.

And then, I headed out into the cold night to go to The Algonquin, another legendary New York spot. Normally when we meet up there, it’s relatively quiet in that main lobby area (captured so memorably in Peter Bogdanovich’s film They All Laughed). But when I walked in, the place was hopping, packed with people. A pre-theatre crowd maybe? They ended up finding seats for us in “the back room,” which sounded ominous, but revealed itself as a beautiful and quiet wood-paneled room, with (hilariously) a gigantic TV screen on one wall showing an image of a roaring crackling fire. We found it mesmerizing.

We had a wonderful time. I just want to point out (in the photo below) the magnificent and detailed gingerbread house placed in the main lobby area. It was outrageous and intricate, with M&Ms lying around in the sugar-snow that you could scoop up and eat if you wanted to. I didn’t want to, because I imagined how many flu-ridden just-wiped-my-sniffly-nose fingers would have already touched those M&Ms. Still, it was festive.

I’ve lived here for 20 years. It’s nice to go to places and look around and still have that, “Ahhh, Manhattan” shiver of appreciation. Nights when Manhattan shimmers.

15437085083_88fb3300ea_z

15437083233_0603d3de08_z

15870684579_9b60a6f90a_z

15869457620_3983af6617_z

15437082203_107acf467e_z

15869289288_a73ee1b26a_z

15870979547_2711b0c831_z

Posted in Personal | Tagged | 11 Comments

My Favorite Films of 2014

My Top 10
(more in-depth commentary, and other writer’s choices over at Rogerebert.com):

1. Beyond the Lights, directed by Gina Prince-Blythewood.
2. Boyhood, directed by Richard Linklater. Review here.
3. Closed Curtain, directed by Jafar Panahi. Review here.
4. Force Majeure, directed by Ruben Östlund. Review here.
5. The Grand Budapest Hotel, directed by Wes Anderson.
6. Ida, directed by Pawel Pawlikowski. Review here.
7. Inherent Vice, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson. Review here.
8. Love Is Strange, directed by Ira Sachs. Review here.
9. Only Lovers Left Alive, directed by Jim Jarmusch. Review here.
10. Under the Skin, directed by Jonathan Glazer. Review here.

And because there are so many other movies to see, 2014 being a really good year, here are other films. So let’s call it a Top Whatever. In no particular order.

11. The Babadook: The other night, I stood in front of the IFC Center, waiting for the screening of King Vidor’s The Crowd. Three youngish guys had just emerged onto the sidewalk after seeing The Babadook. They stood smack-dab in the middle of the sidewalk, so that passersby had to circle around them, and talked, feverishly about how great the movie was. They were clearly horror fans (from what I gathered in my blatant eavesdropping) and many of them expressed dismay and disappointment about how so many horror films treat serious subjects in a really cursory manner, whereas in The Babadook those serious subjects are the whole point. One of the guys said, “I mean, it’s about grief, right? The whole thing is about grief!” The other one said, “Yeah! Exactly!” They were so excited about it that they decided to go out and have a drink to discuss it more. Now that’s a good movie. My review of The Babadook is here.

12. Neighbors. One of the best comedies of the year. Refreshing. Hilarious. Unexpected. Not what you think it will be at all. Go, Rose Byrne. She and Seth Rogen make a great comedic team. The movie is about a lot of things, letting go of youth, while you still insist to yourself that you can hang with the kids, and be cool, remember when we were cool, honey, remember? A really confident and effective film. Wrote about it – and Zac Efron, who is incredible in it, here.

13. Selma. This is a major film. By focusing on the struggles of Martin Luther King with the locals in Selma (not just George Wallace and the whites, but the rival civil rights groups who considered Selma their territory), director Ava DuVernay pours that huge story into a narrow and totally charged container, keeping things specific when they could go really broad. It goes broad anyway, in the harrowing sequences of the walk over the bridge (masterful) and in the “coming around” of Lyndon B. Johnson, as he finally stepped up to do the right thing. All of those behind-the-scenes are important. They provide context and a window into King’s very specific non-violent movement. The performances are tremendous. The script had been knocking around Hollywood for a while. DuVernay rewrote it, bringing the focus back to King and his colleagues, where before it was a lot about white reaction to the events. (Here’s a fantastic interview with DuVernay about how Selma came to be.) An extraordinary film. A major moment in so many ways.

14. Last Days in Vietnam. Rory Kennedy directed this phenomenal documentary about the final weeks of the Vietnam War, and the backstage stories about Vietnamese trying to get out on the last helicopters leaving the city, as well as the concerted and desperate efforts from American soldiers and American aid workers and embassy workers trying to get their Vietnamese friends and co-workers out. Made up almost entirely of newsreel footage (many of which are famous images: the helicopters being pushed off the deck of the aircraft carrier, the line of people climbing up the chimney to get onto the helicopter hovering over the roof), there are many many stories here I had never heard. An extraordinary document of first-hand witnessing.

15. Goodbye to Language. What can I say, it’s Jean-Luc Godard. A political and sexual and visual mishmash, angry and strange, funny and bizarre, Godard is still experimenting, still pushing the boundaries of what film can do, what a story can take. It’s in 3-D, and he futzes with the image, so that faces are superimposed over backgrounds, or there is almost a halo effect over certain scenes, so you feel like you are looking at something that has been exposed too many times. Or that if only you squinted hard enough all of the images would align and click into place. Godard fans will recognize his style, his interests. You either love it or hate it. But the best part of it is: he forces you to deal with what HE wants to show you. It’s his way or the highway. I love that forcefulness, and I love thinking about what he puts onscreen. His stuff has enormous reverb. Deafeningly loud.

16. A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night. Blown away by this first-time director’s debut. My Rogerebert.com review is here.

17. Gone Girl. There was a lot of agonized commentary over David Fincher’s Gone Girl, the kind of commentary I find tiresome. Did the movie endorse misogyny? worried the worry-warts. In my opinion, these are the wrong questions. I don’t care what a movie endorses. (Showing something is not endorsement, by the way, but that’s a side issue.) All I care about is whether or not a film knows what it is, and then goes ahead and IS that thing with 100% commitment. (I may not care for the end result, but that, again, is another issue.) Gone Girl does that: it is what it is, ferociously. I didn’t find it worrisome or troubling, I didn’t feel like “all women are evil witches” was the message. All I felt was: Jeez Louise, this broad is out of her MIND, and … even better … she is totally entertaining in her vicious world-class manipulation. Jen and I were guffawing at the image of her lolling around, her mouth full of Kit-Kats. Like, she’s the honey badger, man, she doesn’t give a shit anymore. This is kicking it old-school, this is Barbara Stanwyck, this is femme fatale, this is grown-up time. Give me darkness, give me sick and twisted, give me some anger. I have my own opinions about Gillian Flynn’s book, and the whole “cool girl” thing, which I thought was pretty brilliant. What I loved about the movie is that it was relentless in devoting itself to that sick disgusting relationship, and those two gross people. I wasn’t disturbed by it. I thought it was hilarious.

18. Blue Ruin. Adore this beautifully made and terrifying and hilarious twist on the revenge film. And Eve Plumb is in it. Honestly, what more could you want from life? Jan Brady as backwoods vicious matriarch? Hell, yes. My review here.

19. Snowpiercer. It’s been months and I still love talking about that movie. I am still not over it. Grandiose and dark, thrillingly designed and executed, it was one of my favorite movie-going experiences of the year. My review here.

20. Life Itself. Steve James’ documentary about Roger Ebert is one of the most touching films I’ve seen all year. It gives a great portrait of Roger as a newspaperman, one of the last of his kind, and is also the story of Roger’s final illness, and his marriage to Chaz. The film must go on. I watched it in tears. It’s an amazing accomplishment, and the success it has received thus far is richly deserved. Here’s my post on seeing it at EbertFest.

21. Nymphomaniac Vol. 1. I am not sure the protocol here. Am I supposed to not separate the two films out? Judge them as one film? I saw both, and reviewed both for Ebert. Volume II didn’t grab me as hard as Volume 1 (My review of Vol. II here.) It took me a while to come around on Lars von Trier, and I still can’t stand Breaking the Waves, but Melancholia was my breaking point. I am still in LOVE/LUST with that film (my review here) I went into Melancholia expecting to hate it, and I love it so much I saw it 4 times in the movie theatre and now own it. It’s fun being wrong. Nymphomaniac Vol. 1 is a dizzying and sometimes ridiculous polemic, even slapstick at times, delving into the hundreds of sexual exploits of one particular woman. It’s intellectual, it’s agonized, but it’s also hilarious. Uma Thurman’s scene is one of my favorite scenes of the year. “Come on, children, let’s go look at the whoring bed!” My Rogerebert.com review of Nymphomaniac Vol. 1 is here.

22. Clouds of Sils Maria. One of the best films about an actor’s process that I have ever seen. It’s up there with Opening Night (and I rarely put anything up with Opening Night). The two films have a lot in common, and Clouds of Sils Maria earns the right to stand in the company of Opening Night. I adored it. My review is here.

23. The Double. I’ve read that some people despised this film, and it’s on a couple of Worst Of lists. I thought it was awesome. Taking Dostoevsky’s harrowing story about a man who is haunted by his own double running around town, and putting it into a completely specific world – it’s not our world, it’s some OTHER world – was a beautiful choice. Removing the story from a recognizable context and placing it in some other dark industrialized Orwellian world highlighted the intensity of the tale, the destabilizing of one man’s identity. I was riveted by it.

24. We Are the Best! What a delight. What a fun and touching movie about three 12-year-old girls in 1982 Stockholm, forming a punk band. Fantastic. My review is here.

25. Thou Wast Mild and Lovely. This is a cheat, since it has not gotten a release yet and is still making the festival circuit rounds, and getting occasional screenings in random places. Josephine Decker is the director. She also did Butter on the Latch, another extraordinary film showing her unique vision and style. Thou Wast Mild and Lovely takes place on a farm, and Butter on the Latch (which mixes documentary footage as well as surreal horror-film elements) takes place at an actual Serbian folk-music camp that occurs every year in the woods in the Pacific Northwest. I want to go to that folk-music camp. Sign me up! Seeking both films out in a double feature (I think BAM just did that recently) would be well worth it. Thou Wast Mild and Lovely knocked me flat, I’m telling you. It is not like anything else. If I told you the plot, I would be doing the film a disservice. In a way, the film is more about Decker’s distinctive style than anything else, but there are images in the film that have never left me. The moment with the frog. The kitchen utensils in the air, against the blue sky. The final scene. Please keep Decker on your radar. Keep your eyes peeled for her. This feels like a pretty major voice. And now I will point you to The New Yorker, and Richard Brody’s excellent piece: Pay attention to Josephine Decker. Yes. What he said.

26. Nightcrawler. A disturbing and uncompromising character-study. It’s also a really interesting look at the world of “night crawlers,” guys who race around town with cameras, filming crime scenes, and then selling the footage to news stations. It’s a world I know nothing about. But at the center of it is Jake Gyllenhall’s creepy Rupert Pupkin-ish performance. Definitely his best work yet, and I’m a fan. My review is here.

27. The LEGO Movie. While on vacation with my family in New Hampshire, I ended up watching the movie four times, with my various nieces and nephews. I had not seen it in the theatre. I had read the good reviews. I adore Chris Pratt. I loved him from the second I saw him in Zero Dark Thirty (“I’m listening to Tony Robbins and planning out my future. I really want to talk to all of you guys about this.”), and his small role in Moneyball was terrific. If you read the book, you know how it makes you fall in love with Scott Hatteberg. Chris Pratt gets that. Perfect casting. Anyway, it’s been so fun seeing him get these huge roles now. The LEGO Movie has a great script, wonderful voice performances, and is inventive and fun. I mean, come on. I watched it four times in four days. At one point, I said to my nephew, “Can we watch The LEGO Movie again?”

28. The Strange Little Cat. Almost difficult to describe. Hypnotic. Very funny. I reviewed it for Rogerebert.com. The revolt of the objects.

29. A Coffee in Berlin. Staying with the German theme: A Coffee in Berlin is a monster-hit in Germany, racking up tons of awards, and it hasn’t gotten a ton of play over here. I am not sure why. Maybe people think it’s going to be serious and then are disappointed when it’s not? Maybe the fact that it’s black-and-white makes it seem like it will be serious? I have said before that I wish more movies felt free to be silly, and also that directors knew how to be silly like they used to. They used to know how to do it. A Coffee in Berlin has its deep side, but in some respects there is nothing deeper than truly absurd silliness. I loved this movie. I reviewed it for Rogerebert.com.

30. The Skeleton Twins. My kind of movie. So much so it feels custom-fit. I want all movies to be like this. I am just happy The Skeleton Twins exists. Reviewed it here.

Other movies I saw this year and loved: Child’s Pose, The Boxtrolls , Watchers of the Sky, The Homesman, The Guest, Dear White People, Kelly & Cal, Omar, Joe, Le Week-end. I’m probably forgetting some stuff.

I’ve missed some of the movies on many Top lists, and still have some catching up to do. Some of the movies everyone is raving about I didn’t care for at all. That happens sometimes. These are the movies this year I really loved.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 35 Comments

The Individual Top Tens of 2014 (at Rogerebert.com)

There are 10 main writers over at Rogerebert.com, and yesterday we published our consensus Top Ten.

Today, the editors have published each of our individual Top Tens. (The main contributors are featured, and so are a bunch of other writers for the site as well as Roger’s beloved Far-Flung Correspondents.) It’s awesome to see the diversity in choices! Where we overlap, where we diverge. Odie Henderson and I think a lot alike!

The Individual Top Tens of 2014.

Well worth reading everyone’s contributions, but for the record, here are my choices, with links to reviews (when one exists, that is). These are not ranked in order, but listed alphabetically.

1. Beyond the Lights, directed by Gina Prince-Blythewood.
2. Boyhood, directed by Richard Linklater. Review here.
3. Closed Curtain, directed by Jafar Panahi. Review here.
4. Force Majeure, directed by Ruben Östlund. Review here.
5. The Grand Budapest Hotel, directed by Wes Anderson.
6. Ida, directed by Pawel Pawlikowski. Review here.
7. Inherent Vice, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson. Review here.
8. Love Is Strange, directed by Ira Sachs. Review here.
9. Only Lovers Left Alive, directed by Jim Jarmusch. Review here.
10. Under the Skin, directed by Jonathan Glazer. Review here.

Longer list to be posted in a couple of days, with more films. But that’s the Top 10.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Goodbye To All That (2014); directed/written by Angus MacLachlan

MV5BNzgxOTkwMzEyMV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMDY1Mzg1MzE@._V1_SX214_AL_

No, not the famous Joan Didion essay (strange, to pick such a famous title. Kind of like that recent Vanessa Hudgens’ movie called Gimme Shelter. Although maybe MacLachlan is consciously connecting his movie to Didion’s essay?)

I wrote about this film a couple months ago, when I screened it for the Gotham Awards, and at the time, it had no release date. Goodbye to All That is coming out in limited release starting today, so I wanted to push this review to the forefront.

Title (and terrible poster) aside, Goodbye to All That, written and directed by Angus MacLachlan (who wrote the wonderful Junebug) is a beautiful and strange little story about a man named Otto (Paul Schneider). Otto is not a bad guy. He loves his 9-year-old daughter Edie (Audrey P. Scott), loves to participate in road races, has a lot of enthusiasm for things, he thinks his marriage to Annie (Melanie Lynskey) is pretty good, he’s got a good job, you know, he’s doing good! But from the very first scene, when he wipes out after crossing the finish line in a 10k, you get the sense that things are not really … okay with this guy. The next scene shows him careening through the woods on a little open land-rover with his daughter. At least she’s wearing a helmet. They’re having a blast! Until they crash into a tree, and Otto’s foot is so messed up as a result that he may actually have to get it amputated. Mother and daughter walk down the hospital hall together, and daughter says, in a really worried voice, the kind of voice you never want to hear from a 9-year-old: “Why do these things always happen to daddy?”

Goodbye To All That doesn’t really answer Edie’s question but it presents the problem. Otto is accident-prone. If you know accident-prone people then you know the frustration of having to deal with their continual mishaps. Much of it is not their fault. But at some point, accidents occur because the person getting in the accident is not paying attention. What happens when you live your whole life not paying attention to it? Otto honestly thinks he’s paying attention. That’s the beauty of Schneider’s performance. He’s not a jerk. He’s not overtly selfish. But on some cellular level, he is in a fog. And so disasters continue to befall him because he doesn’t think things through beforehand. Other people may bump their head when their little jeep crashes. Otto’s foot is so wrecked he may lose it. The doctor scares the shit out of him, telling him to stop taking runs every day, do you WANT to lose the foot? Otto, though, thinks: Come on, I gotta still take a run every day, how else am I supposed to get exercise?

Paul-Schneider

Otto is a grown man but has somehow missed the memo that life is short and you have to pay attention to it in order to 1. survive it and 2. get the most out of it. So he misses things. In another early scene, right after the land-rover accident, his wife summons him to have a meeting with her therapist. Otto’s reply is a confused, “You have a therapist?” In the meeting with the therapist, Otto is informed that his marriage is over. He is completely blindsided. He wants to talk to Annie about it, but she keeps looking at the therapist who answers for her: “No. This is over. Time to move on.” Otto can’t believe it! His marriage fell apart and he didn’t even notice it happening. Annie is an immovable wall. She doesn’t even want to speak to Otto. Anything he has to say to her should be said through their lawyers. Otto blusters around, “Wait, what??? What happened??”

Otto is in the passenger seat of his own life. He doesn’t even realize it. He has to move out of his house, all with the busted foot. He suddenly realizes that Annie is starting to restrict his access to Edie. He panics. But then he slowly figures out that the situation is much more dire. Edie doesn’t feel safe with her dad. She sits on the counter watching him cook pasta for her, holding the recipe up and out, basically over the open flame, and you can see Edie take it all in. She already knows that you have to look a little bit down the road with every choice you make, even cooking pasta, and he’s so busy blabbing to her that he’s not realizing the water is boiling over. She has to remind him. Other things happen. His house is broken into and he’s robbed. He starts to date, and he has a series of bizarre encounters with freaky-deaky women he meets online.

GoodbyeSchneiderGraham

There are times when Edie wakes up and hears her father having sex with some lady in the other room. She doesn’t want to stay there anymore. And yet at other times, she bursts into tears and clings to him, “Please don’t leave me, Daddy!” It’s heartbreaking. She senses that something really bad could happen to her father. Something REALLY bad. Otto is completely dazed that his daughter would see him that way.

There’s no real formal structure to the film. It’s a series of unfortunate events, basically. The acting is so strong, and the mood of the film, set by MacLachlan is so sure and steady, that it never loses its way. It’s a character study, my favorite kind of film. Otto is a man who doesn’t understand that he needs to get into the driver’s seat, in moments big and small. His wife is a piece of work, let me tell you, and I couldn’t help but think that Otto dodged a bullet with that broad. But his daughter. There are the real stakes. That relationship is in peril. And what does Otto plan on DOING about it? Can an accident-prone man basically decide to stop having so many accidents?

hr_Goodbye_to_All_That_3

Goodbye To All That is quiet, sometimes uproarious, and often extremely sad. The young actress playing Edie is so wonderful, her sharp worried little eyes looking around at her father’s life, and knowing … somehow … that something bad is going to happen to her while she is under his care. Otto is so clueless he doesn’t catch it. He doesn’t get it. The film is not didactic. It is not the slow methodical journey towards a man taking responsibility for himself. The film is messier than that. I appreciate its mess. People come and go, they enter Otto’s life and then exit, sometimes screaming at him about something he’s done, all as he looks on, completely baffled.

The final moment of the film, however, the small coda placed on the story as the credits begin to roll, was so poignant that I gasped when it came onscreen. It’s a small triumph, and (most likely) temporary, but it was hopeful, in an extremely chastened way.

New Yorkers: It’s playing at the IFC Center.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Ten Best Films of 2014 (by Rogerebert.com contributors)

The way it worked was: Each writer for the site submitted his/her own individual Top 10 List. The editors then collated the group list into a collective Top 10. Tomorrow, our own individual lists will be published. Each one of us was assigned to write a blurb about a specific film on the group Top 10. I was assigned Jim Jarmusch’s dreamy Only Lovers Left Alive.

So voila, from the contributors at Rogerebert.com:

The Ten Best Films of 2014.

And I’ll put up a link tomorrow to all of our individual Top 10s. It should be interesting! It’s such a talented group of writers over there. I am proud to be a part of it.

I have also put together a much more sweeping Top Films of 2014, there’s something like 30 films on it, and I’ll put that up here some time before Christmas, which, good Lord, is next week. In the next couple of days then.

To those who griped about this being a bad year for movies (the gripes happen every year), I would say: What the heck are you talking about? The early part of the year we were DROWNING in awesome films, all of which were playing in actual multiplexes, and not just in New York and L.A. It was a pretty damn great year for movies. This fall we have had Inherent Vice, Selma, Dear White People, The Babadook, Nightcrawler, A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night … there are more. These are major films, for all different kinds of reasons.

Anyway, enjoy our list. Maybe you’ll see some of your favorites there too.

Posted in Movies | 3 Comments

The Crowd (1928); directed by King Vidor

Crowd-1928-Poster

Last night was a really special evening: my friend Farran Smith Nehme has written a wonderful novel called Missing Reels. It’s about a bunch of movie-mad characters in 1980s New York who start on a wild goose chase to track down a (fictional) lost film. In an early scene, the lead character, Ceinwen, a Southern transplant to New York, goes to see King Vidor’s masterpiece 1928 silent film, The Crowd, with her romantic prospect, a British post-doc mathematician named Matthew. Neither of them have seen it. (Warner Brothers did release it on VHS, but it has never been released on DVD to this day. If you want to see it, you have to keep your eyes peeled on the TCM listings, or you have to look for it at art-house theaters.) It is a crucial moment in the book (and Farran opens the book with a perfect quote from the movie): the two characters bond together in a new love of silent films, and it starts them on the path to see more of them. They basically trip over a mystery of a lost film, completely forgotten in the mists of time. All sorts of wonderful hijinx ensue as they try to track it down.

Last night, at the IFC Center down in the Village, they showed The Crowd, in a 35mm print, and Farran spoke afterwards about the film. A nice crowd showed up (speaking of crowds), many of whom knew Farran, but also many who just wanted to see the film in a theatre. There were a lot of people there who had never seen it before, so that was thrilling as well. I saw it on TCM years ago and it blew me AWAY. I have never seen it since, and never seen it in a big theatre with a live audience, so I was extremely excited.

Afterwards, Farran spoke about the first time she saw it, in the middle of the night on TCM. It stunned her, and she said she realized how often this film had been copied or imitated or flat out stolen from, and she never knew it. You recognize shots from other films, Billy Wilder’s The Apartment comes to mind, with this shot from The Crowd of the lead character’s job in an insurance company:

the-crowd

That’s a long swooping shot over the heads of the crowd, down, down, down, until we find our hero. The shot feels endless. But that is just one example of many: King Vidor was doing things that would become vogue and hip in the 60s with the French New Wave, revolutionary things like filming out on actual streets, the camera tracking along with the character. Vidor would place the camera in a pushcart. There’s one scene where the hero runs down a sidewalk, and the camera careens alongside of him. It’s a completely modern shot and so common now as to be almost cliche (Steve McQueen expanded on it in Shame, but it’s basically the same shot), but seeing it here in 1928 is a revelation. Farran observed afterwards, “The sad thing is is that talkies came in just at the time that silent movies were getting this good.

The acting is naturalistic, funny, and poignant. James Murray, who had been an extra and plucked out of the literal crowd by King Vidor, plays John Sims, the lead. Mary, his wife, is played by Eleanor Boardman. The transformation that James Murray has to go through is nothing less than epic in scope. From a hot-shot eager young guy, to a ruined shell of a man … and he’s fantastic, heartbreaking (as well as super handsome). Boardman is wonderful: she is a realistic wife, not sentimentalized or idealized. She’s funny and supportive, but also worried and rightfully frustrated that her husband is not making good choices. How much more can she take?

vlcsnap-2012-07-22-17h08m54s59

There’s an absolutely gorgeous moment where she is by herself: They have had a fight, a terrible fight, and he has stormed off to go to work. She is left alone in the apartment, and the camera stays on her, as she cries, and then … with her body language, her gestures … you can see her realize that she forgot to tell him that she is pregnant. This is the first time WE know she is pregnant. But the way her hands run over her belly, her face suddenly registering fear and shock that he has gone storming off, and he doesn’t KNOW … it’s all there. You don’t need words. When I talk about the old-fashioned school of acting, the pantomime-based gesture-based school of acting that was in vogue for centuries until film came along and other skills started to be prioritized … THIS is what I’m talking about, a moment like this. She is magnificent in her clarity of gesture, and yet it still looks completely naturalistic. Every gesture has an emotion attached to it. And it flows. It tells the entire story.

vlcsnap-2012-07-22-17h42m48s188

There’s a lot of physical comedy. Wife calls out, “Don’t fall on the ice, dear!” Husband is irritated at being corrected and fussed over, please stop hectoring me, dear, and then promptly falls on his ass on the ice. There’s an absolutely uproarious sequence when the newlyweds, on their way to Niagara Falls after their wedding, have to have a cramped wedding-night on a sleeper-car. The husband keeps barging into the wrong compartment. The film predicts Death of a Salesman, in the fact that John, the lead, keeps saying he’s going to do “something big,” he’s going to be a big shot somehow, he is going to stick out from “the crowd.” His father told him he would be something big. But the film knows that that is a fantasy, and it also separates him, in very bad ways, from all that is good in life. You can’t have contempt for “the crowd.” You’re one of them. The husband and wife struggle, she’s no doormat, they live in a cramped apartment where they are (at times) literally on top of each other. Life is tough. Unforeseen things happen. They struggle to make sense of it. He is desperate to make a name for himself, but he just … can’t quite … get it together. The film is meticulous in its attention to small details (the chaotic picnic on the beach, the coffee pot falling into the bacon) and also grandiose in its universal concerns. Both elements of the film work together. The second the characters go outside, they are swept up in a seething mass of humanity, swirling through the streets, whirling through revolving doors, pushing their way onto the subway. The crowd scenes are, frankly, overwhelming.

Warner Brothers had sent the print to the IFC Center, but had neglected to send along the accompanying soundtrack. That was a snafu on Warner Brothers’ part, but it ended up being fascinating and gave me a completely new experience in movies: watching a silent film with no music. Total silence in that theatre, the audience watching, in total silence, sometimes bursting out laughing, but then falling back into rapt watching, and – in one unforgettable moment – gasping, when something tragic occurs. If you’ve seen the film, you know what that tragic event is, and even though I knew it was coming, it was heartbreaking. And hearing this modern New York crowd all around me, gasping in their collective breaths, one guy murmuring, “Oh no …” somewhere behind me …

It brought me to tears. This is why movies are important. This is why the best of them can bond us together. We go into this dark space together, we don’t know each other, but we are there to have some kind of collective experience. Together. That’s the key. It’s also great to have the technology to watch movies at home, in privacy, and I see a lot of movies that way. But watching The Crowd, with no music, and hearing that gasp of horror and empathy and sadness from a group of strangers … It just doesn’t get any better than that.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 7 Comments

Millennium Mambo (2001); directed by Hou Hsiao-Hsien

l_141621_0283283_dac700ff

A circuitous and depressing film by the Taiwanese master Hou Hsiao-hsien, Millennium Mambo takes place in 2001, but, as the exhausted-sounding female narrator tells us, the events in the film happened “ten years ago”, giving a sheen of nostalgia and loss to the proceedings that is hard to pinpoint, hard to capture. Mark Li Ping-bin shot the film, and its visuals are the most striking thing about it. The story is barely there, really, the story is not the point. It’s about a mood, a time, a vibe, a Taipei vibe. The voiceover sometimes describes things (“Hao Hao stole his father’s watch, and the cops showed up with a warrant …”) and then we see the events go down, just as the voiceover said. There’s a repetitive feeling to it, a haze, appropriate because the characters are all pretty aimless, nobody has a job, drug use is a part of everyday life, and there’s a sense that they all are suspended in time, frozen, caught in a feedback loop of degradation, abuse, and a longing for escape. Vicky, the lead, is played by gorgeous Hong Kong actress Shu Qi. Vicky, as the voiceover informs us (using “she”, the current Vicky distancing herself from 2001 Vicky), started having sex at 16, and then got caught up in a relationship with Hao Hao (Tuan Chun-hao), who is a pouty self-absorbed DJ, a drug addict, a loser, and abusive. They rent an apartment together, cluttered, but decorated in bright candy colors, so that often it looks like they’re still in one of the many nightclubs where they spend most of their time. Hao Hao is unpredictable, goes through her things, quizzes her jealously, and tries to force her into having sex when she doesn’t want to. Her resistance is pretty half-hearted, a couple of slaps here and there. She seems more irritated than anything else. Mostly, she just lies back and takes it, before shoving him off. She gets a job as a hostess (i.e. stripper) and there meets Jack, (Jack Kao), a gangster involved in pretty shady stuff, but he is nice to her, and becomes a buddy, a protector. She is caught between the two men. But the ties that bind are flimsy, both are depressing alternatives. There are other men, too, a couple of Japanese brothers who invite her to visit their mountainous home in Japan for a film festival. She goes. They play in the snow. But then it’s back to Hao Hao. The voiceover tells us that Vicky could never get rid of him. He pestered her for years.

The main reason to see Millennium Mambo is to experience Hou Hsiao-Hsien’s work (his stuff very rarely gets releases over here, and he’s an absolutely wonderful director. Millennium Mambo is considered minor Hou, and is part of a larger loose trilogy.) Millennium Mambo is frustrating if you look for a regular conventional plot. It’s not here. Things happen. Then other things happen. We see people in closeup, the background completely blurred out, making them seem almost super-imposed on their own environment. The club-hopping is relentless, and the relationships are shallow and yet also sick and twisted, difficult to extricate yourself from. Late in the film, Jack tells Vicky that she could get a job in one of the coffee shops he owns. You don’t make a lot of money, but it would be a regular life. Vicky, who is not even 20 years old yet, looks at him sadly, almost confused. Could I just … do that? Leave all this? And “this” is no great shakes. But it’s been a trap, and Vicky, so young, can’t even imagine any other life for herself.

In a way, it’s a deeply strange film. It seems that nothing happens. And honestly, nothing really does. Every scene has a techno-beat thrumming underneath it, a buzz, and a hum of nightlife, even in quiet scenes in apartments. The nocturnal life is insistent, it will not let go easily.

The acting is good, nothing flashy, nothing intricate. Much of the dialogue feels improvised. There’s a messiness in the behavior, a repetitiveness sometimes, the arguments circling around awkwardly, as they do in real life.

That voiceover is haunting. There’s something missing in Vicky, some essential sense of self, some core. She’s young. Maybe that’s the problem. But there seems to be darker suggestions in the film, her passivity, her indifference, her lack of understanding that she is in charge of herself. You watch it and you want her to stay with those boys in Japan, playing in the snow, and eating good food cooked by the grandmother. That looked nice. But it’s a respite only, brief and surreal. The film opens with her, in slo-mo, walking across a bridge over a highway, smoking a cigarette, her arms occasionally flinging out with abandon and freedom, turning back to look at the camera, making sure we are watching. Hao Hao is horrible. Jack is protective but ends up stranding her in Tokyo. Who are all these people? Who is Vicky?

I still don’t know. It doesn’t seem to matter. It was an experience. A moment in time that already feels so so long ago.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

“Charlie’s nose is totally broken, blood gushing and all he’s saying on the way down is, ‘That was the greatest punch I’ve ever been hit with. Jesus, what a punch. Perfect. Oh, my god.’”

Part 3 of Kim Morgan’s epic conversation with Elliott Gould, Joseph Walsh, and George Segal, about California Split (which turns 40 years old this year.)

So many great exchanges, but this one made me laugh out loud:

EG: Ernie Lehman? He was a tightwad?

GS: Oh my God.

EG: But he was like a friend!

JW: A tight friend.

And here’s Part 1 and Part 2.

Posted in Actors, Movies | Leave a comment