NYFF 2014: Clouds of Sils Maria (2014); directed by Olivier Assayas

MV5BMjA4NDk0MjA5NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjc5Nzk3MTE@._V1_SY317_CR10,0,214,317_AL_

The buzz for Olivier Assayas’ latest film was deafening; it made it difficult to avoid not only spoilers, but a glut of opinions that may somehow color my own. (The same thing just happened with the Inherent Vice premiere that just happened at NYFF. I had to get off Twitter to avoid the chatter. Even casual chatter can seep into your brain. I prefer to come into things fresh. I’ll read up on it after I see the damn thing.) The couple of things I gleaned via osmosis about Sils Maria was that
1. Everyone was loving it.
2. Kristen Stewart was superb.

Some were expressing shock at #2. I guess these people didn’t see Adventureland. Or Stewart as Joan Jett. Tabloid press like the press she got for years, seeps into the air, it’s in the molecules; it sets up a kind of hostile relationship between actor and public, and it has nothing to do with the work that is onscreen. Press like that affects you, the viewer, whether you like it or not. She was fine in Twilight, but it felt to me like the overwhelming publicity made her nervous. She wasn’t, say, Julia Roberts, whose comment on what it felt like to become such a big star with Pretty Woman, was a gleeful, “Really really good.” There were times on red carpet events and interviews when Stewart seemed uncomfortable and embarrassed. Sullen, even, with all the attention. Maybe somewhere she knew she hadn’t earned it yet. Sometimes she appeared to be in over her head as an actress. She had some habitual gestures (pushing her hair behind her ear, for example) that came up repeatedly, and just showed that she was a bit green in her technique. Some of her work in Twilight reminded me of watching young kids in acting classes, college kids, who have a talent, but don’t quite know what to do with it yet. Their body language gives away their nerves and uncertainty. Unfortunately, Kristen Stewart was learning on the job in front of millions of people. Many don’t survive that kind of scrutiny.

I don’t find her to be a particularly romantic figure. Maybe that was part of the issue with Twilight. The material wasn’t appropriate for her but she was super young, she got cast, and she was contracted to finish the whole thing out. Stewart seems depressive to me. She’s gloomy. She’s slightly suspicious. Her sense of humor is cautious. She’s got some anger. She feels uncomfortable about that anger. There’s some interesting stuff going on there with her, a clash of needs: she wants to appear likable, but there’s something prickly about her, not ingratiating. That, by the way, is her most interesting characteristic. If she’s lucky, she will not be defined by Twilight, but the mere fact that people were surprised at how good she was in Clouds of Sils Maria shows her situation loud and clear.

Enough preamble. Let’s talk Clouds of Sils Maria. What a thrill this movie is! And yes, Stewart is as good as everyone said.

Kristen-Stewart-Clouds-of-Sils-Maria

Juliette Binoche plays Maria Enders, an international star. She became famous when she was 18, appearing in a play where she played a ruthless wild young woman who wraps her older female boss around her little finger. Now, pushing 50, Maria has been asked to appear in a revival of the play, only this time playing the boss, the older woman. A new up-and-coming star, Jo-Ann Ellis (Chloë Grace Moretz), has been tapped to play the role that Maria originated. Maria doesn’t really want to do the project, and has mixed feelings about it. But the director wants her, and wants her bad, his entire project rests on her participation. It’s a gimmick. Maria knows that, resents it, resents what it might mean about her career. But her resentment is nothing compared to what happens to her when she starts preparing for the role. At Maria’s side at all times, managing her career, running lines with her, is a young personal assistant named Valentine (Kristen Stewart).

This is a film about women, aging, and identity. The connections to Ingmar Bergman’s Persona are clear. Liv Ullmann, in Persona, plays a famous actress who has suddenly stopped speaking. Nobody knows why. She’s had some kind of nervous breakdown, and a nurse (Bibi Andersson) is hired to take care of her at a summer house retreat. The actress never speaks (Ullmann has only one line in the entire film), and the nurse, faced with that wall of silence, suddenly finds herself unable to stop talking. Over the course of Persona, the two women (quite literally at one point, in the most famous shot in the film) merge.

zzpersona9

This is a film about acting, one of the best I’ve seen on the topic. It’s up there with Opening Night, a film about Myrtle, an alcoholic middle-aged actress (Gena Rowlands), who rehearses a play and resists the process, mainly because the role she has been hired to play is that of a middle-aged woman who admits she is losing sexual power. Myrtle basically refuses to play the role as it is written: “If I play this part well, my career is over, you know that!” Meanwhile, as they rehearse the play, Myrtle becomes haunted (literally) by a young fan she saw hit by a car outside the theatre. That young woman, 17 years old, shows up, taunting Myrtle, basically flaunting her youth in Myrtle’s face in increasingly dangerous ways: “I have what you want. I’m young. You’re not anymore. Get out of my way.”

opening night 6+

The fear the older woman feels when she is confronted with the ruthlessness of youth, its self-absorption, its total lack of interest in who you are and what you may have to pass on. The terror of knowing it is time for you to step aside …

I thought of both Persona and Opening Night as I watched Clouds of Sils Maria, and yet the film is also clearly its own animal, with its own strange and uneasy identity. Mysterious, eerie in a way it is hard to decipher or pin down.

As I try to do, I avoided reviews until I had seen it. I am extremely grateful that I did. If someone had “spoiled” it for me, it would have completely changed my experience of the film. So consider that before you read further. I will do my best not to give anything away.

28

Whose point of view is the film from? It seems to fluctuate. We see Maria through Valentine’s eyes, and yet there are times when we see Valentine through Maria’s. There are times when it appears to clearly be Valentine’s story. But then … it changes. And then changes back.

Is there some underlying hostility between Maria and Valentine? It’s hard to say. From the first scene, you get the sense that there is a comfort and ease between these two women that only occurs in the best business partnerships. Maria is the star. Valentine runs interference. She fields calls, she manages press, she also has input on what is happening, input that Maria needs.

1196789_Clouds of Sils Maria

Maria is not a bitchy diva, treating her assistant like a peon. That’s not the relationship. The two of them hole up in a house in Switzerland in order to work on the script. They run lines. They smoke constantly. Maria stops, to talk about the scene, the character, how strange it is to be entering this well-trod territory only from another viewpoint. She can’t stand her new character. Why is she being forced to play a victim? Who does this young uppity bitch think she is? (The uppity bitch role that made her a star.)

Maria and Valentine hash all of this out in their rehearsal sessions. Valentine thinks the older woman role is a powerhouse, thinks that Maria is conceiving of the character too narrowly, too judgmentally. Maria listens. They try the scene again. Maria ends up stomping out of the house in a rage. They come back together to try it again.

Screen-Shot-2014-05-22-at-10.25.51-AM

The role is hitting too close to home for Maria. What happens if she plays it well? What message will she be giving? What exactly is she participating in? Her own death-throes? An acknowledgement that she is losing her grip? If she plays the role successfully, she will have eclipsed herself, she will drown.

These long scenes, of the two of them rehearsing, over the breakfast table, or during long hikes through the mountains, are nothing short of extraordinary. I almost couldn’t believe what I was seeing. So few films about acting care enough to get it right. So few films about stardom really take the time to examine the nuts-and-bolts of acting process that helps most stars get to where they are. Maria is a real woman, smart, good at script analysis, maybe she drinks too much, maybe she has had a bunch of failed relationships, but she is not stupid, and she knows that by taking this role she is admitting something about herself, something that few women race to admit to, famous or no.

clouds-of-sils-maria-cannes-2014-2

An additional issue for Maria is Jo-Ann Ellis, the young actress hired to play the role she had originated. Maria has never met Jo-Ann. Valentine, however, knows everything about her and has been following her career for years. We don’t meet Jo-Ann until halfway through, although we are treated to Youtube footage of her getting arrested for a DWI and attacking the arresting officer, and press conferences where she behaves in a rude and sullen manner, looking like she just rolled out of bed.

Jo-Ann Ellis, in other words, is kind of a Kristen Stewart type. A young woman who is becoming a star, who is being hounded by the paparazzi and clearly isn’t handling it with grace. But Valentine has a different perspective on all of it, the perspective I mentioned at the beginning of this post. Maria is turned off by what she knows about Jo-Ann Ellis, and because Jo-Ann is in big superhero franchises and other stuff, Maria hasn’t taken the time to pay attention to the young woman’s acting. Superheroes? Who cares. But Valentine has taken the time, Valentine has paid attention.

clouds-of-sils-maria-chloe-grace-moretz

Valentine urges Maria to look PAST the comic book material Jo-Ann appears in, to watch the work, and watch what she is actually DOING onscreen. They go see Jo-Ann’s latest film at a small theatre in the nearby town. It’s some superhero intergalactic thing. Maria can’t take it seriously and laughs at it throughout. Valentine and Maria go out for beers afterwards to discuss. Valentine tries to make Maria see that Jo-Ann is doing stuff with her superhero role that other actresses wouldn’t do, she is using herself and her talent in an extremely interesting way, and she has a big big future. Valentine doesn’t plead her case with Maria. She insists that Maria look deeper, inquire deeper, get past your preconceived notions, watch the ACTING. Valentine’s critical analysis is extremely sophisticated (watch Stewart play these scenes: there had to be a real sense of fun and triumph for her in being allowed to, basically, stick up for herself, or for her alter ego!).

The scenes between Binoche and Stewart are a marvel, rich with behavior, rich with fascinating dialogue (Assayas wrote the screenplay as well). You get to know the play they are working on so intimately that it feels like an actual extant work, like Doll’s House or something. But as the rehearsal process goes on, something strange starts happening to Valentine, in conjunction with Maria’s disintegration into panic over succumbing to the role. They somehow become mirrors, but it’s not clear, at first, that that is what is happening. One night, Valentine takes the evening off to go meet a boyfriend and has to pull over to the side of the road to throw up.

And that’s all I’ll say about that. The less said about the Persona-like implications of the script the better. Best to watch it unfold, not knowing a thing.

kristen-stewart

The rehearsal process, delving into the fictional story of a younger woman and her older female boss, start to blend the boundaries between Maria and Valentine with the characters in the play. There’s some transference taking place, something unspeakable, something disturbing. The setting adds to the dream-like qualities. Every day the clouds roll in between a gap in the mountains, and there’s something about the air currents, the way the mountains are shaped, that make the clouds into long ropy snakes, undulating low and relentless over the landscape, before passing on by. The clouds are supposedly a bad omen. They aren’t like other clouds. There’s something … uncanny about them.

clouds-of-sils-maria-movie-photo-3

Just like there’s something uncanny about Clouds of Sils Maria. There are many reasons to love the film. Olivier Assayas is a huge talent, both in writing and directing. It’s a pleasure to watch whatever he is up to. It is also about acting, and I treasure films that are really about acting. About what acting can dredge up. Something may not be REAL, but it is still TRUE. Actors understand that better than most. It stars a trinity of three actresses: Binoche, Stewart and Moretz. Each are allowed to breathe, live, behave. Nobody’s a type. The film is about womanhood, in all its mess and complexity. It’s not a particularly kind film, but it is extremely smart. It keeps its cards very close to the vest.

clouds-of-sils-maria-movie-photo-4

In the scene when Jo-Ann and Maria finally meet for the first time, before starting official rehearsals, Jo-Ann, eager to make a good impression, tells Maria that she had seen her play Nina in The Seagull and it blew her away. Ah, so Maria played Nina. Nina, the aspiring actress with the heartless famous actress mother. Nina, who shows up at the end of the play, close to madness, after realizing that a desire to do well does not mean that you actually WILL do well, telling her old childhood friend, in one of the most famous monologues ever written, and beloved of actresses everywhere:

He never believed in the theatre, he laughed at all my dreams, and little by little I stopped believing in it too. And then all the emotional stress, the jealousy; I was always afraid for the baby … I started getting petty, depressed, my acting was emptier and emptier … I didn’t know what to do with my hands, I didn’t know how to hold myself onstage, I couldn’t control my voice. You don’t know what that’s like, to realize you’re a terrible actor. I’m the seagull … No, that’s not it … Remember that seagull you shot? A man comes along, sees her, and destroys her life because he has nothing better to do … subject for a short story. No, that’s not it … What was I saying? Oh yes, the theatre … I’m not like that anymore. I’m a real actress now. I enjoy acting, I’m proud of it, the stage intoxicates me. When I’m up there I feel beautiful. And these days, being back here, walking for hours on end, thinking and thinking, I could feel my soul growing stronger day after day. And now I know, Kostya, I understand, finally, that in our business — acting, writing, it makes no difference — the main thing isn’t being famous, it’s not the sound of applause, it’s not what I dreamed it was. All it is is the strength to keep going, no matter what happens. You have to keep on believing. I believe, and it helps. And now when I think about my vocation, I’m not afraid of life.

Jo-Ann says to Maria that it was Maria’s performance as Nina that made her choose her “vocation,” a clear nod to Chekhov’s script (so if you know it, you will get the reference), and slightly manipulative (but very smart) on Jo-Ann’s part. You can see Maria suddenly SEE Jo-Ann in that moment, and realize she had under-estimated her. But there are all kinds of dizzying endless associations to be thought about and picked through here. The clash between art and life, the clash between reality and one’s dreams, the clash between what you want to express and what a piece of given material will allow you to express …

download-1-clouds-of-sils-maria-kristen-stewart-s-new-film-welcomes-a-host-of-new-stills

There’s a mystery here. It’s not a “puzzle” film, thank goodness, although there will be those who treat it as a puzzle to be solved. That would be like watching Persona and mistaking it for Inception. There are mysteries in this life that are not to BE solved. The mysteries stand, impenetrable, forcing us to deal with the problems of our own lives, with the irreconcilable contradictions, with the harsh truths one cannot wriggle out of facing. Each character is facing a truth. Each character sees herself in the other. Each character loses her way, and then finds her way, and then loses it again. What will be the outcome? Can all three survive? Can all three get what they want?

The clouds roll in, like clockwork, relentless and strange, covering up everything in sight. Each character has a limited amount of time to figure it out, whatever “it” may be, before all will be obliterated.

It’s the kind of film that instantly expands, exponentially, the second it goes to black. It sets off echoes of reverb in the mind. It made me think, it made me go back and think about it, trying to understand. It is bigger than its parts. It holds multitudes.

A fascinating thought-provoking and deeply emotional film. I feel selfish about it, almost. Like: “This movie feels like it was made JUST for me.”

Thankfully, that is not the case. Clouds of Sils Maria hasn’t opened yet. It’s playing this week at the New York Film Festival. Wider release coming. One of my favorite films of the year so far.

download-4-clouds-of-sils-maria-kristen-stewart-s-new-film-welcomes-a-host-of-new-stills

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Three Movies: Before I Disappear, Goodbye to All That and Kelly & Cal (2014)

Before I Disappear (2014); directed/written by Shawn Christensen

Before-I-Disappear-Poster

A couple of years ago, I saw a short film at the Tribeca Film Festival called Curfew (My review here.) Only 19 minutes long, I consider it a masterpiece and it was one of my favorite films of that whole year. I loved it so much I sought out the writer/director/star Shawn Christensen and interviewed him about the film. He was wonderful and articulate and we spoke for a long time. He’s so talented. Sometimes the good guys win, and Curfew went on to win the Best Oscar for a Short Film. I was watching the ceremony with two pals, and looked at Shawn Christensen up on that stage and felt so psyched that I had seen it at its premiere at Tribeca, and look where that little film went. Not surprised at all. I was very excited to learn that, riding on the success of Curfew, Christensen turned it into a feature. Before I Disappear is still doing the festival circuit right now, release date TBD.

Curfew told the story of a suicidal drug-addicted guy named Richie, whose life is a total wreck, and one night his sister interrupts his latest suicide attempt via a call coming on the red rotary phone in Richie’s apartment. She is desperate, and pissed off. She needs him to come watch Sophia, her daughter, Richie’s niece. It is clear from the phone call that Richie and his sister are not in touch. At all. “Can you do something right for once?” she sneers at him. Richie, lying in a bathtub of bloody water, listening to his sister bitch him out, considers what she’s asking, and then says casually, “Okay.” He bandages up his wrist and comes to watch Sophia. Sophia is played by a little girl named Fatima Ptacek. She is serious and studious, and stares at Richie, his cigarette constantly dangling, with the dead disapproving eyes of a person who already knows life is messy and who knows that she does not want her life to be messed up at ALL.

Curfew told the story of the night Richie and Sophia spend together. Beautifully filmed and conceived, using cliches and turning them romantic and poetic and original, Curfew is a 19-minute odyssey about a man coming back to life, and a little girl loosening up a bit, and falling in love with her uncle. She needs him in her life.

Before I Disappear takes that central event and opens up the world around those main characters. We learn more about Richie, his sorry violent swirl of a life, where he owes money, where women OD in the bathrooms, where he is beholden to everyone he meets because he just cannot get his shit together. The film also opens up the intriguing world of Maggie, Richie’s estranged sister (played gorgeously by Emmy Rossum). There were hints in Curfew that Maggie, although she lives in a gleaming penthouse, is a mess, too. Before I Disappear explores that. Fatima Ptacek is back as Sophia, only a couple years older now, still serious-eyed and a little bit bossy, a little girl who doesn’t have a father, whose mother is obsessed with her daughter doing well. Sophia has absorbed her mother’s anxiety. “You cannot take me into that place. It’s not a place for kids. I will not go in there. I need to do my homework.” she keeps saying to Richie, as he drags her around the city.

before-i-disappear-movie

Some of my favorite scenes from Curfew are back: the one-take conversation over French fries. The glorious scene in the bowling alley which made me fall in love with Curfew forever and ever, amen. We are introduced to a couple of peripheral people in Richie’s chaotic life, both of whom are his boss. Only it’s more like being an indentured servant, or a sharecropper, where you can never ever work off your debt. He cleans the bathrooms at two competing nightclubs, one run by a scary muscle-man named Bill (Ron Perlman – who knew the guy had such huge cut forearms and biceps? I didn’t!) and one run by a sort-of friend named Gideon (Paul Wesley, great in his small role).

before-i-disappear-7-620x283

Some of the larger plots don’t work all that well, but what does work beautifully is the sense you get (that was there in Curfew) that Richie’s life is a series of disasters. He is not so clueless that he doesn’t realize that Sophia is only 11 years old. He’s not partying in front of her, or exposing her to his life. He refuses to take her back to his horrible apartment, filled with junkies, because he just knows … No. No kid should go in there. As the long night goes on, there are moments where his obligations to her and to looking out for her start to trump everything else. It happens by stealth. It happens without the film making a point of you noticing it. There’s a moment where they’re riding the subway, and she’s asleep on his shoulder, and he rests his head on her head. Sophia is not an idealized little girl. She’s an individual. She has dance class, she’s a gymnast, she has a lot of homework, her mother is worried all the time, so she keeps her nose to the grindstone. She looks at Richie, clocks him as a mess, and starts interrogating him on why he keeps smoking, why he doesn’t eat vegetables, why he doesn’t have a girlfriend. The dynamic between these two actors is still such a pleasure to watch.

before-i-disappear-3

What the hell happened to Richie to make him like this?

Christensen is a wonderful actor. He’s extremely handsome, but he doesn’t prioritize that in his performance. Richie is on drugs, as well as withdrawing from drugs, so he is sweaty and clammy and anxious. He has a very New York-ish way of speaking, almost Woody Allen-ish, a neurotic speaking-out kind of language, his interior anxiety coming to the surface repeatedly. “Ya givin’ me a headache right now …” he says to Sophia … “I mean, the migraine … ya know … would ya stop …”

There are moments where you worry the film will derail. That he will take Sophia somewhere that they can’t get out of, that the film will turn violent, or make Sophia into some sort of bait. Before I Disappear doesn’t do that. It has a dark heart, but it maintains a light tone. The fear is definitely there, that Richie will do something that will ruin her, but Before I Disappear doesn’t take advantage of it. Sophia’s innocence is already shattered, anyway, because of her mother and her horrible absentee father, and Sophia is doing the best she can to survive her own childhood. Richie starts to realize that she’s the best kid. She’s the best best kid he’s ever met. Top notch. It makes him see his scary sister in a new light. She’s raised the best kid ever!

At the bowling alley he takes Sophia to, he is summoned to go talk to Gideon, who owns the joint. Richie refuses to leave Sophia. It’s 11 o’clock at night at a bowling alley slash night club. So a bouncer comes over to hang out with Sophia while Richie is gone. I, as an audience member, was thinking, “Oh God, please don’t let anything bad happen to Sophia. Come ON.” Richie is gone for way too long, talking to Gideon, but when he returns, Sophia and the gigantic bouncer are found deep in the middle of a card game. Both of them slapping down cards seriously, totally engrossed in the game. They barely look up when Richie sits back down.

That’s Before I Disappear. That’s Christensen’s outlook, his gift, his sensibility.

It’s a corrupt world, but it’s also a kind world.

Like Skeleton Twins, Before I Disappear is ultimately about siblings, and how siblings survive (or don’t) a traumatic childhood. Something horrible happened to Richie and his sister. They were so close. That closeness no longer exists. As the sorry swirl of events unfurls across the screen, you start to get the sense that it is THAT, and nothing else, that has made Richie the way he is. Some wellspring of strength and memory has been cut off from him, he no longer has access to it. What happened to his sister? Where has she gone? Where did I go?

Curfew is still the masterpiece. Something about the short condensed format helped Christensen tell his story with spareness and a taut perfection that contains worlds of deep emotion and hope. Before I Disappear scattered that intensity a little bit, in opening up its story. But still: Christensen is a director and writer (and actor) to watch. He’s the real deal. A major talent.

Watch his shot construction. Watch his inventiveness with framing. Each choice represents a well-thought-out impulse. He doesn’t move the camera just to move the camera. There’s a classic understanding of the “rules” of filmmaking at work here, used with great invention and sensitivity. The music is perfect (Christensen was a musician, too – some of his music is featured in the soundtrack, especially in the key bowling alley scene). Before I Disappear is a story of redemption. Or, at least, becoming dimly aware that redemption is still a possibility. And that, for some people, is all you need.

Goodbye To All That (2014); directed/written by Angus MacLachlan

Paul-Schneider

No, not the famous Joan Didion essay, but the movie. Strange, to pick such a famous title. Kind of like that recent Vanessa Hudgens’ movie called Gimme Shelter. Why would you do that to yourself?

Title aside, Goodbye to All That, directed by Angus MacLachlan (who wrote the wonderful Junebug, and also wrote this) is a beautiful and strange little story about a man named Otto (Paul Schneider). Otto is not a bad guy. He loves his 9-year-old daughter Edie (Audrey P. Scott), loves to participate in road races, has a lot of enthusiasm for things, he thinks his marriage to Annie (Melanie Lynskey) is pretty good, he’s got a good job, you know, he’s doing good! But from the very first scene, when he wipes out after crossing the finish line in a 10k, you get the sense that things are not really … okay with this guy. The next scene shows him careening through the woods on a little open land-rover with his daughter. At least she’s wearing a helmet. They’re having a blast! Until they crash into a tree, and Otto’s foot is so messed up as a result that he may actually have to get it amputated. Annie and Edie walk down the hospital hall together, and Edie says, in a really worried voice, the kind of voice you never want to hear from a 9-year-old: “Why do these things always happen to daddy?”

Goodbye To All That doesn’t really answer Edie’s question but it presents the problem. Otto is accident-prone. If you know accident-prone people then you know the frustration of having to deal with their continual mishaps. Much of it is not their fault. But at some point, accidents occur because the person getting in the accident is not paying attention. What happens when you live your whole life not paying attention to it? Otto honestly thinks he’s paying attention. That’s the beauty of Schneider’s performance. He’s not a jerk. He’s not overtly selfish. But on some cellular level, he is in a fog. And so disasters continue to befall him because he doesn’t think things through beforehand. Other people may bump their head when their little jeep crashes. Otto’s foot is so wrecked he may lose it. The doctor scares the shit out of him, telling him to stop taking runs every day, do you WANT to lose the foot? Otto, though, thinks: Come on, I gotta still take a run every day, how else am I supposed to get exercise?

Otto is a grown man but has somehow missed the memo that life is short and you have to pay attention to it in order to 1. survive it and 2. get the most out of it. So he misses things. In another early scene, right after the land-rover accident, his wife summons him to have a meeting with her therapist. Otto’s reply is a confused, “You have a therapist?” In the meeting with the therapist, Otto is informed that his marriage is over. He is completely blindsided. He wants to talk to Annie about it, but she keeps looking at the therapist who answers for her: “No. This is over. Time to move on.” Otto can’t believe it! His marriage fell apart and he didn’t even notice it happening. Annie is an immovable wall. She doesn’t even want to speak to Otto. Anything he has to say to her should be said through their lawyers. Otto blusters around, “Wait, what??? What? What happened??”

Otto is totally in the passenger seat of his own life. He doesn’t even realize it. He has to move out of his house, all with the busted foot. He suddenly realizes that Annie is starting to restrict his access to Edie. He panics. But then he slowly figures out that the situation is much more dire. Edie doesn’t feel safe with her dad. She sits on the counter watching him cook pasta for her, holding the recipe up and out, basically over the open flame, and you can see Edie take it all in. She already knows that you have to look a little bit down the road with every choice you make, even cooking pasta, and he’s so busy blabbing to her that he’s not realizing the water is boiling over. She has to remind him. Other things happen. His house is broken into and he’s robbed. He starts to date, and he has a series of bizarre encounters with freaky-deaky women he meets online.

GoodbyeSchneiderGraham

There are times when Edie wakes up and hears her father having sex with some lady in the other room. She doesn’t want to stay there anymore. And yet at other times, she bursts into tears and clings to him, “Please don’t leave me, Daddy!” It’s heartbreaking. She senses that something really bad could happen to her father. Something REALLY bad. Otto is completely dazed that his daughter would see him that way.

There’s no real formal structure to the film. It’s a series of unfortunate events, basically. The acting is so strong, and the mood of the film, set by MacLachlan is so sure and steady, that it never loses its way. It’s a character study, my favorite kind of film. Otto is a man who doesn’t understand that he needs to get into the driver’s seat, in moments big and small. His wife is a piece of work, let me tell you, and I couldn’t help but think that Otto dodged a bullet with that broad. But his daughter. There are the real stakes. That relationship is in peril. And what does Otto plan on DOING about it? Can an accident-prone man basically decide to stop having so many accidents? But how is THAT supposed to work?

hr_Goodbye_to_All_That_3

Goodbye To All That is quiet, sometimes uproarious, and often extremely sad. The young actress playing Edie is so wonderful, her sharp worried little eyes looking around at her father’s life, and knowing … somehow … that something bad is going to happen to her while she is under his care. Otto is so clueless he doesn’t catch it. He doesn’t get it. The film is not didactic. It is not the slow methodical journey towards a man taking responsibility for himself. The film is messier than that. I appreciate its mess. People come and go, they enter Otto’s life and then exit, sometimes screaming at him about something he’s done, all as he looks on, completely baffled.

The final moment of the film, however, the small coda placed on the story as the credits begin to roll, was so poignant that I literally gasped when it came onscreen.

Highly recommended. No release date yet. Still making the festival circuit. But keep your eyes peeled.

Kelly & Cal (2014); directed by Jen McGowan

Kelly & Cal Movie Poster

You guys. You guys. It’s so good. Jonny Weston, as Cal, gives such an extraordinary performance that it is up there with my favorite performances of the year. I had seen him before, as the young surfer kid in Chasing Mavericks, and he was wonderful. He’s unbelievable in Kelly & Cal. And what he is doing is deceptively simple. It’s a difficult role. He makes it look easy and inevitable. Jonny Weston has a jock-ish look to him. He’s thick, he’s muscular, with a handsome face, but it could be termed generically handsome. In the 1980s, he would have been cast as the jerk jock at the high school. Or, hell, even now, he would be perfect as the jerk jock in a letter sweater. But in Kelly & Cal, he gets a role that allows him to show what he can really do.

movies-kellycal-090514-videoSixteenByNine540

He has moments of such subtlety, such true listening, that he is able to hold the screen with Juliette Lewis (which, let’s face it, is not easy to do. She’s a phenom, always has been, and it is very difficult to take your eyes off of her). The majority of Kelly & Cal is made up of long scenes between Lewis and Weston and they are, quite frankly, amazing. They’re allowed to play out. The script, by Amy Lowe Starbin (Girl Power!), is intricate, funny, devastating. It all rests on the believability and watchability of these long scenes between Lewis and Weston. You watch a relationship develop.

75

I went into the film not knowing much about it, so I hesitate to say more. Part of the sheer pleasure in the film is watching how it all unfolds. Cybill Shepherd has a terrific cameo, Josh Hopkins is excellent as Juliette Lewis’ husband, Lucy Owen is brilliant in a very small role as Kelly’s sister-in-law, playing the kind of woman who is bitchy/judgmental as her default personality. You know those women? Lucy Owen nails it. Her every line reading, her every expression … it’s not a vicious caricature. It’s an insightful character study of women who are like that.

But this is Lewis’ and Weston’s film.

Their scenes together are a master class. And Weston is a star. This is a star turn. Not because it’s flashy or overly emotional or even because the character Cal is in a wheelchair. This is a star turn because this Weston kid knows how to act. He knows what he is doing. He is extremely vulnerable to the material. He understands subtext. He knows how to listen, how to think, how to take in what’s coming at him, how to change tack, how to play an objective, how to bring forth the layers of mystery and pain that make up Cal’s life. It is not a self-congratulatory performance. It is deeply grounded. Juliette Lewis has been doing excellent work for decades. My pal R. Kurt Osenlund interviewed Juliette Lewis before August Osage County came out and it is definitely worth checking out. One of the things that so struck me about the interview was the following quote from Lewis:

Here’s the trap: Leading with sex. That’s always what I say. I feel bad for all of these girls who lead with sex. It’s not what I ever led with when I was younger, it’s not what I put forth, it’s not the first energy. I’m incredibly in tune in that way when I’m in a relationship, but I think you’re in for a really tragic surprise if that’s what you’ve led with as an artist, or as a female, because we’re all gonna age. To me, if you’re trying to be a sex object, that’s the lowest-common denominator of what you can aspire to. And luckily, I have really interesting, artistic, quasi-bohemian parents who never validated me in the way of beauty. It was never like, “Make sure you look pretty!” I had parents that always promoted nurturing your voice, or your ability, or what you want to do. And now I look back and I’m proud of whatever groundwork I laid, because it was a conscious effort. I never cultivated an image, which is one of the easier things to do—wearing the right dress, and everything all the young starlets do. I never wanted to be known for what I look like. I almost was insulted if a magazine would talk about my cheekbones, or my lips, or whatever, because I knew it was objectification, and I knew it was going to reduce quality and content when it came to the work.

film-kelly-570

Yes. Shirley MacLaine said a similar thing about her own career. She was a leading lady, she even got some ingenue parts, but early on, in her early 30s, she started taking “character parts”. She was not afraid to be dowdy, she made a conscious choice to take character parts, even when she was still in the leading lady bucket, because she didn’t want her career to be about youth, or hanging on to youth. She still wanted to be working when she was 80. And look at how that has come to pass.

It takes great guts to resist that call to be the new starlet. Juliette Lewis, after her debut in Cape Fear, was in a state of white-hot stardom and excitement. I remember that time. I remember the kind of press she was getting. She dated Brad Pitt. She was always a kook, though, and didn’t really play by the rules, and her role choices showed that. She has continued to forge her own path. She is always good. She is a chameleon. She can enter into anybody’s psychology. I would never have clocked her for that role in August Osage County and she was fantastic. Here, in Kelly & Cal she plays a woman who used to be part of the Riot Grrrl movement. She was in a band called Wet Nap. They put out ‘zines. They modeled themselves after Sleater-Kinney. They were hot shit. She’s 40 now. She just had a baby. Her husband, whom she met in art school, is now in advertising and he works all the time. He’s moved her to suburbia so they can be closer to his family. She is completely at sea in her own life. She is sleep-deprived, distant, and feels like when her newborn baby cries she “sucks at this”, as she whispers to herself at the changing table.

75-1

Then she meets Cal, a kid in a wheelchair in her neighborhood.

And that’s all I’m going to say.

And this is why we need more female film-makers and female screenwriters. They bring their own perspective, not just to women, but to men. It is a welcome change. Perhaps a male film-maker would have had Cal be the lead, our “way in”, and we would see Kelly through his eyes. That’s usually the way it goes. We have so many stories, so so many, about men bucking against the limits of middle-aged life, parenthood, fatherhood, and how lonely and unsatisfied they feel. Some of these films are very good. Two of them are above this review. But the male-point-of-view is so omnipresent that you may actually believe, if you didn’t think about it too deeply, that life really is that way and that way only, and the male viewpoint is the only one one could possibly have, and anything else somehow “diverges” from that default. Male experience is not the default experience. People get sick of hearing about it, but sorry, until things get better, I will continue talking about it, and I will continue to point out shining examples of films that have a more diverse point of view, that include women into the circle, that don’t look at women from the outside.

Kelly & Cal is not just Kelly’s story. It is her story and Cal’s story, but every character surrounding them is also allowed to be three-dimensional. Even bitchy sister-in-law is coming from a place of such pain and resentment that it has literally poisoned her personality. I have been that character. Believe me, it sucks. It would have been so easy to make Kelly’s husband an asshole. He’s not. He’s also clueless, disappointed with how his life turned out, a first-time dad, completely at sea at what to do with his depressed wife who has zero sex drive anymore, and he’s doing the best he can. Cybill Shepherd as the mother-in-law TRULY wants to help. Yes, she is completely invasive and intrusive. But my God, she means well. Everyone here is a PERSON. The story is not so tilted in Kelly’s favor that everyone else is a paper cut-out. It’s a confused world filled with people doing the best they can.

What happened to all those bad-ass Riot Grrrls stomping around in combat boots in 1995? Where did they go? Where do they fit in now? The world actually DIDN’T change because of those Riot Grrrls, even though it felt, at the time, like something new was emerging, alternatives, power, something different from sexuality-driven personae. But then along came Britney Spears and the whole culture went THAT way instead of the Sleater-Kinney way, because everyone seemed to prefer that image of femininity as opposed to the alternatives being offered. But those “girls” are still around. Kelly & Cal is beautiful in that it examines and contemplates that moment in time, the Riot Grrrl moment, so important to those of us who lived through it.

Kelly & Cal is a very sad story, in many respects, but it’s also funny, smart, tender. Disturbing and insightful. Complex.

And Jonny Weston is gonna be huge. At least … if the world were a fair place, he would be huge. I’m betting on it. I look forward to much much more from this kid.

Kelly & Cal is currently playing at the New York Film Festival. It’s also part of the London Film Festival, premiering on October 9. Actual public release dates TBD.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Review: The Skeleton Twins (2014)

large_large_p0p30eIBXwqHtqqDUqOwXYadL6F

I haven’t been paying attention to the marketing of the film. Judging from the poster, with the cheery bright blue background, and the word “funny” in a large font, I imagine it’s being marketed as a comedy. Not a surprise, perhaps, because of the two former SNL stars, but it does this quiet uneasy film a disservice. If people go into it expecting a ton of laughs, they won’t find it. And so maybe people will be disappointed as a result, when the problem is their own, not the film’s. There are a couple of hilarious sequences in The Skeleton Twins and they come like gasps of fresh pure oxygen (in one case quite literally), almost dangerous, highlighting the destroyed landscape of the lives of the two main characters. But it is not a “funny” film or a comedy. It’s a thoughtful, poignant, sometimes-disturbing character study of twins who had a couple of horrendous things happen to them when they were young, and now here they are, adults, and they’re still all messed up about it. Decades later. No Band-Aid will fix it.

Some things, when they get broke, get broke for good.

the-skeleton-twins-sundance1

Bill Hader and Kristen Wiig play twins, Milo and Maggie, who haven’t seen one another or even spoken in about a decade. The reasons why are never made clear, but you get the sense that the shared trauma of their childhood has made intimacy almost impossible. Someone who knows what you went through, who went through it with you, may seem like a comfort, but that’s really only true from a privileged outsider standpoint. Often people need to keep their distance from those who knew them at their most vulnerable. This seems to be the case with Milo and Maggie.

The film opens with both of them on the verge of suicide, separated by an entire continent. Milo, wasted, writes a good-bye note, steps into a tub, and opens a vein. Across the country, Maggie stands in her bathroom, staring down at a handful of pills in her hand. Her phone rings. It is a hospital in Los Angeles, calling to inform her that her brother has been admitted, attempted suicide. Maggie flies to be with him. The opening scenes are quiet and sad, and withhold more than they reveal. The pieces are given to us in fragments, just glimpses, throughout the course of the film. We know something bad must have gone down. We don’t know what. We find out.

Part of the intense pleasure of the film (and it is, despite its dark subject, intensely pleasurable) is that it knows what it is, and takes its time in revealing what it wants to reveal. When the revelations come, they are handled gently and sadly, organically. The information doesn’t feel manipulative, as it might in more Lifetime-television hands. All we really need to know is there in that opening sequence.

140911_MOV_SkeletonTwins.jpg.CROP.promo-mediumlarge

Maggie is married and still living in their home town of Nyack; she has a better surface going on in her life than Milo does, but she, in many ways, is even more of a wreck. She is a world-class liar. She keeps secrets without even really realizing they are secrets. She is self-destructive. She doesn’t even realize how bad things are with her until she brings Milo back to her house to recover.

Maggie is married to Lance (Luke Wilson, absolutely perfect in the role, so perfect I can’t picture anyone else pulling it off). Lance is a gregarious kindly extrovert, a nature-lover, a fantasy-football-guy, a friendly and humorous presence, who loves Maggie and really honestly is “the nicest guy in the world,” as Maggie calls him. And he’s not a Nice Guy(™). I know guys like Lance. They are my family members. I’ve dated a Lance or two. They exist. But they so rarely show up in film without some comment being made about the character. You know, he’s nice, therefore he’s a dupe! Or he’s nice, therefore he’s really a jerk on the inside. No one can be that nice, right? Well, sorry, unimaginative screenwriters, yes, there are people that nice, and they are INTERESTING if you would get to know them and give them a little bit of room to breathe in your screenplays. (Mark Heyman co-wrote the screenplay with director Craig Johnson.) Luke Wilson really IS that guy.

the-skeleton-twins-bill-hader4-636-380

He is stable, steady, and kind. To a depressive like Milo, Lance’s energy seems way too much, it feels like an assault. Why is this guy so happy to meet him?? Well, because he’s Lance, and because he loves Maggie, and has always wished to know his wife’s brother more. So Lance treats Milo entering their household like a gift. Lance is an emissary from the world of Health. You can see why Maggie would be attracted to such a guy. He runs interference for her, you can see him do it, you can see him protect her, support her, be there for her, in his every gesture. He and Maggie are trying to have a baby, and he’s open and unembarrassed about it, about how excited he is, how much fun it will be to “try,” and all that. Luke Wilson is so good that you actually start to worry for the guy. You know that he has no idea how messed up Maggie is. He’s not a dupe or a fool. Her behavior tells no tales. He loves her. He’s a side character in the film, and there are other side characters, but as the film follows Maggie around, watching what she’s like when she’s alone, I started to feel truly concerned about Lance. That is entirely Luke Wilson’s doing. It’s a small marvel, that performance.

But everyone is marvelous here. Kristen Wiig and Bill Hader are completely believable as not only siblings, but twins. They are in sync, they are playful, and when they fight, they go for the jugular. There’s a moment near the end when a comment flies out of Maggie’s mouth, in the heat of the moment, and she has gone too far. She knows it. Milo knows it. And instantly, a look of agony and fear cracks across Wiig’s face, a pained inner scream of “I’m sorry I’m sorry I’m sorry”, her hand clapping over her mouth. Listen, it’s not a surprise at all that Kristen Wiig is a dramatic actress of the highest order. I rank her up there with Madeline Kahn, in that her ability to channel different characters reach an almost uncanny height, and also allows her to tap as easily into tragedy as she does into comedy. Many of her well-known characters on SNL were masterpieces of loneliness and pain, as funny as they were. Kristen Wiig can do anything. Like Madeline Kahn could do anything. Like Catherine O’Hara can do anything. And perhaps something about coming up via comedy makes one less concerned over being ugly/awful onscreen. Perhaps part of comedy is being able to bring out the grotesque side of yourself. Some young female stars, who get the hefty A-list parts, are still so concerned with being liked that it messes up their work. Everything they do comes across as a plea for understanding. Wiig doesn’t do that. She couldn’t care less.

And Bill Hader is wonderful as Milo. Heartbreaking. Riveting. Funny, grounded, fragile. Milo is gay, and once upon a time dreamt of being an actor. He moved to LA to chase that dream, and obviously nothing came of it. He was in a relationship once. It failed. Milo drinks too much, “acts out” when he’s drunk, and continues to yearn towards suicide.

The-Skeleton-Twins1-640x359

Joanna Gleason has a terrific cameo as Maggie and Milo’s narcissistic New-Agey mother, who lives in Sedona, and has pretty much been cut out of both of her children’s lives. She is clueless, self-absorbed, and speaks entirely in New Age speak, a substitute for actual connection. Making fun of New Agey types is like shooting fish in a barrel but Gleason makes Milo and Maggie’s mother a real person, a woman hiding behind those tropes because so much that has happened in her past is, frankly, too traumatic to even absorb. We all have our ways of survival. Gleason is great.

The pleasure in the film comes from the fact that so much of it features people sitting around talking. Good old-fashioned scene-work. It’s my type of movie. Plot shmlot, let me see people who are somehow bound to one another sit around and talk and behave. Let me pick up on what I pick up on. Let the script breathe. Let the moments in between the words have some wiggle-room. The Skeleton Twins is all about that. There were moments of legitimate pain, when I found myself in tears for these two poor people, both doing the best they can, both failing. Maggie has a moment where she fucks up, again, and there’s a quick cut to Wiig sitting alone in her car, beating her hands on the steering wheel crying out, “BULL SHIT. BULL SHIT!!! BULL SHIT!” She looks truly afraid. Marvelous.

There are a couple of sequences where the twins let loose, and the joy that comes careening off the screen is so intense, so piercing, that I found myself catching my breath. These moments capture so perfectly what it is like to have siblings. There it is. That’s the relationship. Films so rarely get siblings right. There’s one scene where Milo and Maggie sniff nitrous in Maggie’s office (she’s a dental hygienist), and all hell breaks loose. The laughter is so uproarious that the two of them are silent for long stretches, staring at one another with huge frozen comedy-masks on their faces. There’s another fantastic scene where the two of them lip-synch around the living room to Jefferson Starship’s “Heart to Heart”, ridiculous, hilarious, clearly something they did as kids. Craig Johnson lets that scene play out. He has the confidence to understand how much we need it. It’s a long scene. They do almost the whole entire song. It’s patient, that scene. It feels no rush to end itself, to move onto the next thing.

There is one good scene after another. There isn’t a bad scene in the bunch.

It’s not a feel-good story, and as the film moves on you become more and more conscious of the sheer amount of wreckage surrounding these two people. There’s no real hopeful “button” put on all of this, but the film is not without joy. It’s about family. There’s pain and sorrow, there’s unresolved shit, there’s unspeakable shit, and there’s also goofing off while under the influence of nitrous. It’s all part of the same flow. By the end, you really feel like you have met some people. For real.

I saw it yesterday at a noon show. The theatre was completely empty except for me and another woman. We both had a blast, and walked out of the theatre talking about it, as though we were lifelong friends and had come to the movie together.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 27 Comments

Review: Copenhagen (2014)

large_nGLSWBJA03CEqqEQ1AyVTz9vEtX

Copenhagen, a first feature from director Mark Raso (who also wrote the script), has been pretty divisive so far as it’s played around on the festival circuit. There are a couple of roadblocks: the unpleasantness of the lead character and the age of the female character. But Copenhagen has some really interesting things going on if you just stick it out. I found it difficult at first. I was so turned off by the lead guy. But there is something on the other side of it (and it’s a very good performance). Besides, one of the things the film is doing is actually questioning its own genre. So I found the film to be strange, off-putting, not perfect, and interesting, far more interesting than your regular conventional fill-in-the-blanks rom-com that only knows how to play by the rules. Yawn. Give me something different, give me something ugly, something that doesn’t really work in parts over something that is terrified to deviate from the formula.

My review of Copenhagen is now up at Roger Ebert.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: The Hero of Color City (2014)

large_52gweuuHgkAy7ToC3wMZR74w9Xt

Just because a film is geared for human beings who barely reach the two-foot-tall mark, doesn’t mean it has to be dumb. Or simplistic.

My review of The Hero of Color City is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Miss Havisham? Is That You?

Feeling restless, I went to the beach yesterday. I took a long walk up and down the empty stretches of sand. There were intermittent rain showers, and the waves were heaving and dark green. There were very few people there. A couple of lonely fishermen standing at the edge of the water, a couple of walkers like myself. Back up on the boardwalk, I looked down at the wide shoreline, and saw ….

a woman in a wedding dress. Standing all by herself down by the water.

I am sure there was some rational explanation. But I am not interested in rational explanations.

I am interested in the story possibilities of such a moment as this.

15391777906_829755147a_z

Posted in Personal | 26 Comments

Review: Last Hijack (2014)

LastHijack_poster

A fascinating documentary about the culture of piracy in Somalia. It’s mixed with animation sequences, taking us where the camera can’t go. Last Hijack is something else, it really is. Can’t really be compared to anything else. I highly recommend it.

My review of Last Hijack is now up at The Dissolve.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

8 Reasons To Watch Transparent

I’m stealing the click-bait-y title:

8 Reasons ‘Transparent’ Is a Very Important Show You Need To Be Watching.

I watched the pilot and loved it; Tambor already brought me to tears twice. Exquisite acting.

But what I really want to say is that #6 on that list is the most exciting reason of all.

Posted in Television | 2 Comments

I’m So Happy That …

1. the moment below actually occurred … that it wasn’t just dreamt up in some alternate-universe alternate-history story-book

and

2. the moment was captured on film.

Look at these two men. Beautiful. A perfect clip.

Posted in Music | Tagged | 12 Comments

Revolver stands as a document of a time when all four of The Beatles seemed to share a common vision.”

My brilliant cousin Liam O’Malley (also a musician, you can check out his great band Dr. Mars on iTunes) writes an essay about The Beatles’ Revolver.

Posted in Music | Tagged , | Leave a comment