Supernatural, Season 11, Episode 3

tumblr_m0zxuadHHj1qcay1ao1_500

Due to GENA GENA GENA OSCARS OSCARS OSCARS ANGELINA JOLIE ANGELINA JOLIE I probably won’t watch tonight’s episode until the weekend. And I haven’t participated at all in last week’s thread. It’s like I’m a sickly woman holed up in my bedroom, only I’m hosting a raging party going on in the next room. Never mind! I am glad you all are discussing! (Also it’s such a relief to know I don’t have to go over to that thread and “check on things” to make sure everyone’s being nice. All y’all are nice, so thank you!!)

One thing I will say: When I saw the clip of Charles Laughton’s Night of the Hunter in last week’s episode I almost fainted. And Helena had warned me but I still almost fainted. One of my favorite movies. And, of course, including that clip has now created the context/filter through which I see everything!

Supernatural/Night of the Hunter thematic dovetails

Hate/Love: the two words tattooed on Robert Mitchum’s knuckles in Night of the Hunter. Two ways to go, two paths to follow/reject. The Darkness: Bad. But there was Love in that first encounter with Darkness, and a kind of redemption/saving too. Grey area, not black/white. GOOD.
Innocence/Corruption: babies, protective women, evil outside forces, a rotting from within
Possibility/Hopelessness: Can you save yourself? Or do you just succumb? Can Mitchum be stopped in Night of the Hunter? Those tiny children take to the river to get away. They are all alone in a scary world, and he is everywhere, singing on the horizon, singing through the trees. The film drowns in a sense of hopelessness. Which is, of course, Supernatural‘s stock-in-trade as well. Also, I must point out: The two people who are threatened by the monster (Mitchum) in Night of the Hunter are siblings.
Sexual Confusion: i.e. Desire/Fear/Loathing – All Happening at the Same Time: HOTHOUSE ENVIRONMENT: Night of the Hunter has it, so does Supernatural, always, and feels like things are bubbling on that level all around. Good.

Then of course there was the eerie sound of the Reaper singing by herself down the hospital hallway, a direct steal from Night of the Hunter. I almost thought Sam would join in, in homage to the film’s most famous scene – and one of the most frightening scenes in cinema, but maybe that would have been too on the nose.

Speaking of on the nose: Last week was Lillian Gish’s birthday and I posted a little something about her.

Her birthday was October 14th, the day of the Supernatural episode that referenced one of her most famous roles. Coincidence?

I doubt it.

Posted in Television | Tagged | 29 Comments

“I couldn’t get rid of him so I married him.” – Gena Rowlands on John Cassavetes

John Cassavetes (1929-1989), acteur, réalisateur et écrivain américain et Gena Rowlands (née en 1930), actrice américaine. Los Angeles, 1974. Photographie de Sam Shaw / Shaw Family Archives.
John Cassavetes and Gena Rowlands. Photo by Sam Shaw

They were married from 1954 until his death in 1989.

Posted in Actors, Directors | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Rimbaud’s Son

An essay I wrote years ago, posted today in honor of the birthday of poet Arthur Rimbaud

A great poet, a really great poet, is the most unpoetical of all creatures. But inferior poets are absolutely fascinating. The worse their rhymes are, the more picturesque they look. The mere fact of having published a book of second-rate sonnets makes a man quite irresistible. He lives the poetry that he cannot write. The others write the poetry that they dare not realize.
— Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray

I saw him again the other day.

He stood in front of the St. Mark’s Hotel in the East Village beside a straggly-haired woman showing the ravages of meth on her face, and he was talking at her fanatically, gesturing with his filthy hands, in a dreamspace of self-importance and grandiosity.

For a brief autumn I had dated him.

I met him the day J.F.K., Jr. disappeared. The body had not yet been found. I stood in line at the A&P deli counter, in Hoboken, wearing a backwards baseball cap, overalls, and hi-top sneakers. What I am trying to say is that the day J.F.K., Jr. disappeared, the day I met Thomas, I looked like a Peanuts character, not at all dressed for romance. Coincidentally (bizarre, considering what day it was), I happened to be reading Chris Matthews’ political biography of Kennedy and Nixon. I had my nose in the book as I stood in line, until I heard a tough-guy voice say, “It’s a shame, ain’t it?”

I looked up and there he was leaning on the other side of the deli counter, white apron on, looking right at me. I didn’t know what he was talking about or why he was talking to me.

“What’s a shame?” I asked.

“Shame about his son,” he said.

It did not escape my notice that the guy behind the counter was gorgeous in an overblown young-John-Travolta way. He had thick wavy black hair, he was about six feet tall, and his eyes were startling. A blazing green. His skin was pale, and he had strong Italian features. Total looker, not my type at all. My type runs towards pasty beefy Irish boys, not green-eyed matinee idols in white aprons.

“Whose son?” I asked.

He gestured at my book. “His son.”

I looked at my book, and then understood. “Oh! Yeah. It is a shame. Just awful.”

It struck me as notable that he would look up from slicing turkey, see Peppermint Patty waiting in line, glance at the title of her book, and then speak about it, as though in mid-conversation. Not “Is that a good book?” or “What are you reading?”

But “It’s a shame, ain’t it?”

Two days later when I saw him sitting on a bench outside the A&P, having a cigarette on a break, I took a second to get my courage up and then walked over to him.

He remembered me. We immediately started talking about J.F.K., Jr., who had by then been found.

He told me his name was Thomas.

Thomas was odd in a way I couldn’t quite place. It was like he was ten years old inside that handsome body, he had the same open-faced enthusiasm as a child, the same fearlessness with strangers. I am much more reserved.

In that first conversation, which lasted all of fifteen minutes, I learned that he loved Rimbaud and Henry Miller. He also loved Wallace Stevens and said to me, “With my white apron on in there, I feel like the goddamn Emperor of Ice Cream.” He did not come off as pretentious or as though he was trying to name-drop me to death. He was simple, open, free. He wanted to be a writer. I would later learn that he had written a novel (unpublished), and had stashed the manuscript with a friend who was a dishwasher at a pizza joint on 12th and Willow in Hoboken. “Yeah, I let him read it. He didn’t really understand it though. I need to get it back from him.”

That first day on the bench, he asked me for my phone number and I gave it to him. He called me the following day and we met up for drinks later that night. He showed up on the date with no money, and although I was willing to pay for a couple of beers, he told me “I’m kind of a hustler” and went off to get some drinks for us. It made me uncomfortable, especially when he returned from wherever he went, wielding two Heinekens. Had he begged? Pestered? So he actually was a hustler. We sipped our beers and I listened to him talk. There seemed to be no pretense with him. It was disarming. He talked and talked and talked, flowing from one topic to the other, yet always connected to me. He picked up on every gesture I made, the smallest of expressions. I learned that he lived at the YMCA in Bayonne, a pretty bleak place, and he was on the waiting list for the YMCA in Hoboken, a step up. He told me he had lived in Union City for a while, but had to move because he thought that the person in the apartment across the way was flashing lights at him from window to window, trying to pass on some sinister message. “Union City is a bad place, man,” Thomas told me. “Even the light is evil there.”

He said at one point, out of nowhere, “I hate deja vu. I feel like one day I’m gonna go into a deja vu and never come out.”

Although much of what he revealed (in his speech, the stories he told, his actions) was alarming to me, we started dating. There were those blazing green eyes to consider.

But what really happened was this: I loved how he talked about books. I could not get enough of it. I grew up surrounded by language, and I grew up with parents who loved to read. In my family, you come home for a visit and two seconds after you are asked, “How are you?” you are asked, “So what are you reading?”

Thomas discovered literature late. He had not grown up in a family who valued language or education. His father was violent and cold, his mother simpering and ineffective. His older brother was in prison. Thomas put himself through college. He majored in English. His family thought going to college was a stupid thing to do, a waste of time, and majoring in English was flat-out insane. But Thomas was drawn to books, to words. His taste ran to the difficult and the surreal. He could be a snob about anything that was too “easy”.

Rimbaud was the hook for Thomas, his way in to the world of words. He had never encountered anything so thrilling. Thomas could talk about Rimbaud for hours, and he did. To anyone who would listen. Bartenders, strippers, co-workers who spoke no English, the ex-cons who lived with him at the Bayonne Y, people on the train. He always carried a battered taped-together paperback of Rimbaud’s work in his back pocket so that he could pull it out at a moment’s notice and read out loud the passage he wanted. Rimbaud was not a distant literary figure to Thomas, he was a companion. We’d be sitting my room, and Rimbaud would come up (as he always did) and Thomas would reach into his back pocket for the book, laughing at himself as he did so. “I get so excited I’m like a little kid.” Rimbaud wasn’t really my cup of tea, but it was riveting to hear Thomas proclaim Rimbaud’s words out loud, in my room on a rainy morning, on the A train, on my fire escape, on the steps of the YMCA:

And since then I’ve been bathing in the Poem of star-infused and milky Sea,
Devouring the azure greens, where, flotsam pale,
A brooding corpse at times drifts by.

The phantasmagorical imagery of Rimbaud’s writing seemed to express to Thomas what it was actually like for him, inside his own head. Rimbaud would certainly understand the flashing evil light of Union City. Rimbaud would also fall into a deja vu and never come out.

Thomas talked about writers as though they had written their books specifically for him. He did not come to “the greats” with preconceived notions or the sense that he should be intimidated by them. He met them fresh. To hear him talk about Yeats or Eugene O’Neill or Shakespeare was, for me, like blood to a vampire. None of it was passive received knowledge. He took it personally. So personally that he tried to commit suicide in college after reading a book by Carlos Castanada. He had spent intermittent months in institutions since then, diagnosed as bipolar. His demons were strong, but he resisted medication even though it was supposed to help him not perceive flashing lights from an opposite window as ominous Morse code. He didn’t like the dulling effects of the meds, he didn’t like having no sex drive, he wanted to still see blazing lights, even if they were sometimes scary.

His attachment to me happened instantly. I became the normal sane thing in his crazy life. I would pick him up at the Y, and he could escape into the confines of my cozy apartment, where there was food in the cupboards, a TV to watch, a warm bed, and he could be fed and nurtured for a bit. But I don’t like clinging, and he clung. I was not allowed to have a day to myself because he would start to get frayed and confused when not in my presence. I would say to him, “I really am not the kind of person who needs to see someone every day. As a matter of fact, I am the opposite kind of person. I cannot see you tomorrow. I need some time to myself, goddammit.” But then at 8 a.m. the next morning, a knock would come on the door, and there he would be, pleading, “I won’t get in your way! You can have time to yourself. I’ll just sit in the other room and read or something! I won’t bother you!”

Right before I met him, Thomas’ father had been diagnosed with throat cancer, and instead of facing chemo and treatment he instead chose to kill himself, shooting himself in the head in front of his wife and son. Thomas told me that no matter what he did he couldn’t shake the image of his father’s head exploding all over the living room. He would wake up in my bed screaming.

I was not really serious about Thomas. I was not in love with him. I was in love with the manner in which he approached literature, and I was in love with how he talked about it. But I didn’t take him seriously for one second as a mate. At that point in my life, I felt I could not afford another heartbreak, and it was safe to hang out with Thomas, because he would never hurt me. This was unfair of me. Thomas was madly in love with me although I never could tell if his feelings were genuine or if he was just clutching at a safe zone, someone to take care of him in the midst of his madness and chaos. He was a hustler, remember. He knew how to get his needs met. But still. It cannot be denied that when I had had enough of the 8 a.m. knocks on my door, the badgering and pleading, the irrational outbreaks, and the nonexistent sex, I cut him loose. He never saw it coming. I hadn’t realized as it was happening how much he had deteriorated in the short time I knew him, but when I looked back at our first meeting, the difference was startling. Being under my wing made Thomas feel he didn’t need to take his medication anymore, so he slowly began to fall apart. I got out just in time. To make matters worse, he pleaded with me to change my mind, grabbing onto me in my car, stopping just short of getting too rough, tears in his eyes, begging me. It was awful. I had to pry his hands off of me and push him out of the car. Slowly, shoulders hunched, he trudged back into the YMCA, and it tore at my heart to see him.

I wondered what would happen to him. I now could see the evil ominous light that had driven Thomas from Union City. It followed him around.

A week or so later, he called me (collect). I was instantly angry. “Thomas, I told you. I am done.”

“I know, I know, sorry, but I just had to tell you that I have a whole new plan. I just can’t take Bayonne anymore. It’s getting me down, you know, and I’ve been reading Hemingway a lot, and you know, he really dug Key West, and I think I’m gonna go down and live there, where there’s no winter and people can just live. I can sleep on the beach, and I can write. I got my book back and I want to work more on it. Hemingway was real macho, but he was an artist, too. I think Key West is gonna be good.”

It sounded like a freefall, but there was something that seemed right to me, too. “That sounds good, Thomas. I hope you find what you’re looking for.”

He was manic. I could hear it in his voice. “Tennessee Williams loved Key West, too,” he babbled on. “And he was gay and everything, but that’s the thing about Key West – it can handle the two poles of masculinity” (his exact words) ” — the Hemingway and the Tennessee Williams – so it can handle me, too. I don’t want to be tough all the time like I have to be here.”

Of course Thomas had an angle in calling me. He always had an angle. All he needed from me, one last thing, was money for a one-way bus ticket to Florida. I hesitated. It wouldn’t be a lot of money, but I had already bailed him out financially a couple of times (especially since he was fired from the A&P for getting violent with a customer and also for stealing some of the deli meats for himself). But he pleaded. “This is the last time I ask you for money, I swear. And I’ll pay you back every penny.”

I gave him the money and Thomas hopped on a one-way ticket ride to the land where the Two Poles of Masculinity could remain in balance and he could hover between the two, Ernest Hemingway and Tennessee Williams holding hands across the blazing white sand.

He called me once more after that (collect, of course) to tell me how things were going. He was dismayed to learn that sleeping on the beach was not allowed in Key West and the cops were really strict about it. He was homeless for a while, stashing his duffel bag with the book manuscript in places where he knew it would be safe. He washed dishes at restaurants, crossed paths with some sketchy characters who offered him money to strip in gay clubs or have sex with older tourist women. He finally was invited by a drug dealer he had met to crash on the couch at the drug dealer’s psychedelic home, full of swirling colored tiles and mannequins hanging from the ceiling draped in Mardi Gras beads. It was something out of a Tennessee Williams play. Thomas had reached the Camino Real. It sounded, frankly, terrible to me, way worse than what had been going on for him in Bayonne, but Thomas talked about it all as though he got a kick out of the whole thing.

I asked, “So how’s that whole Two Poles of Masculinity thing going for you?”

“You know what is so weird about that, Sheila? Key West is full of roosters and stray cats. They’re everywhere. They walk like they own the streets. But I like to think of them as cocks and pussies. Everywhere you look here are cocks and pussies.” He started laughing at his own pun.

“You’re crazy. You should write all that down.”

“I go hustle drinks at Sloppy Joe’s and sit in the seat where Hemingway used to sit. It’s the island of misfit toys down here”

I hung up with Thomas, imagining him sitting in Hemingway’s chair, surrounded by cocks and pussies, and I figured that was that. He sounded cheerful, at any rate, and at least he was out of my hair.

One wintry day a year later, I was walking down the street in Hoboken, and I glanced at a grubby figure lying in a doorway, got one glimpse of the bright green eyes, and stopped, jolted to a standstill. My heart pounded. That couldn’t be him – could it? Why was he here? He was supposed to be in Key West. When did he come back? What happened? He was so filthy I couldn’t be sure it was him, so I circled the block to take another look. I wasn’t sure why I was so frightened. It was terrible to imagine him being so lost like that. I confirmed, in my second walk-by, what I had known from the moment I saw the green eyes. It was him. The homeless man lying in the doorway was Thomas. I was upset, but what shocked me the most, scared me the most, was that his thick black hair had gone completely white in just a year. He was an old man. Whatever grip he had had on reality when I knew him was obviously gone. He was talking to himself, muttering in a cranky self-righteous way. He had his hand out for change and his fingers looked like something out of a Walker Evans photo. The light in his eyes was no longer sane. It was now unearthly, floating about untethered, never landing in one spot. The “azure greens” were now unhinged, staring at “flotsam pale” corpses 24/7. Union City got him after all.

I did battle with myself. Should I speak to him? Remind him of the freckled girl in overalls he had once cavorted with through the midnight streets of the East Village? Remind him of that one night when we were parched and couldn’t find an open deli, and Thomas grumbled, in an annoyed voice,

Water water everywhere, and not a drop to drink!

Would he remember me, or was his madness one that had obliterated the past, wiping out everything along with the image of his father’s head in pieces on the sofa? I moved on, without speaking, pricked with guilt, shaken up for the rest of the day.

I kept my eyes peeled after that, giving each homeless person a second look to see if it was Thomas. But I didn’t see him again, at least not in Hoboken.

Years passed.

And then, the other day, as I mentioned, I saw him again, this time in Manhattan, hanging around on the corner outside that den of despair, the St. Mark’s Hotel. He was arguing with a woman, giving her the business, and I stood back to watch. Thomas, that beautiful sensitive man I had once loved to listen to, staggered away from her, enraged, the over-oxygenated look of a religious madman on his face. He was smoking a cigarette, his clothes were falling apart. He was skin and bones.

As he lurched past me, close enough to touch, I found myself peering at his butt, battered jeans hanging off his hipbones. I had to check. For that dog-eared copy of Rimbaud. I know it’s naive, but if he still had that book, I thought it might mean … something.

But what would it mean? What difference would it have made, ultimately? He still would be a homeless man, off his meds, staggering down the street.

Of course there was no book in his back pocket.

I almost hadn’t recognized that dirty white-haired man. It wasn’t just his appearance that had changed so much, although he had gone through a radical transformation. It was that the actual person looking out of those green eyes was different: He, the tough sweet guy behind the deli counter, was no longer in there, and the Rimbaud had probably been lost a long time ago.

On high roads in winter nights, without roof, without clothes, without bread, a voice gripped my
“Weakness —
those whom I met did not see me.”

But I saw. I saw.

It’s a shame, ain’t it.

rs

Posted in On This Day, Personal | 19 Comments

Another Announcement: Gena Rowlands’ Lifetime Achievement Oscar

tumblr_nt7dih9phw1qzu80so1_500

It’s Announcement City on my site these days.

On November 14, the Oscars hold their separate ceremony for the Lifetime Achievement Award people (this year it’s Gena Rowlands, Spike Lee, and Debbie Reynolds), as well as the Humanitarian Award. Gena Rowlands is my favorite living actress and it was such a tremendous honor – so tremendous it made me feel quiet and gratefulhumbled – when Criterion asked me to write a video-essay about Rowlands’ acting for their release of Love Streams. Rowlands’ work is all wrapped up in my own life, as is true of many great performers and artists – but there’s something unique about Gena Rowlands/John Cassavetes fanatics. Their collaboration means something to people BEYOND the films they made together.

John Cassavetes (1929-1989), acteur, réalisateur et écrivain américain et Gena Rowlands (née en 1930), actrice américaine. Los Angeles, 1974. Photographie de Sam Shaw / Shaw Family Archives.

Their collaboration seems to give hope that true and pure and personal art is possible in America, that “it” can be done and on a GRAND scale, that you can make the kind of art you want to make. Capitalism exists, the market exists, but Cassavetes films can exist too. Rowlands and Cassavetes have inspired three generations now, maybe even four.

John Cassavetes died in 1989. Way too young. He and Rowlands had been married since 1954. They have three children (all of whom have become film-makers and artists as well: Nick, Zoe, and Alexandra Cassavetes). Rowlands, heavily associated with her husband’s work, had had a great career before him (she became a star very young appearing on Broadway with Edward G. Robinson in Middle of the Night) and she has had a great career after him. She is 85 years old, and still working. Not only that, but she’s still a headliner. Olympia Dukakis came and spoke at my school years ago. She was talking about being an elderly actress in Hollywood and I thought it was so funny: even as a 70 year old, the competition never stops. Dukakis said, with no bitterness, only common-sense as well as a respect for the competition: “Listen, every script that comes to me has been offered to Gena Rowlands first. I get the script and her fingerprints are all over it. Any role I get it’s because she’s already turned it down.” That’s indicative of Rowlands’ towering stature.

600full-gena-rowlands

Now for the Announcement, which I feel safe to make since it’s official and the deadline looms and it’s happening for real.

Last week I was contacted by a video-producer who is creating the Tribute Video for Gena Rowlands that will be played at the Lifetime Achievement Oscar awards ceremony. (Each recipient has a similar video). The producers had seen my Love Streams video-essay, tracked me down, and asked would I be interested in writing a similar narration for the tribute video?

Hmm, let me think it over and I’ll get back to you.

The ceremony is happening on November 14th, in Hollywood, so it’s a very quick deadline. I had a conversation with the producer yesterday, in between screenings, so we could discuss the parameters of the project. I have my marching orders.

As I said, Gena Rowlands was one of the reasons I ever became interested in acting at all, when I was a kid. Her work is not like the work of other actresses, whom you might admire, even revere. It’s something different.

To be given the opportunity to pay tribute to her like this, AND at an event where she will be present, is so “full-circle” with my own life that I don’t know how to process it. Ultimately, this is not about me, of course, it’s about her, but still: I remember being 11 and being awestruck by how Roger Ebert wrote about her, before I had ever seen one of her movies. So you see? The personal is tied up with it. She’s the kind of actress where you can say, “I am grateful she exists.” This is different than admiring someone’s work, even loving someone’s work.

056-gena-rowlands-theredlist

One final note: A couple of years ago, when Angelina Jolie received the Humanitarian Award (handed out at the same ceremony as the Lifetime Achievement awards), Gena Rowlands made a great speech, for her “friend Angie.” If you haven’t seen the speech, do yourself a favor … I had not known that these two independent outlaws were friends, but it makes perfect sense. Of course they are.

B7rO2j1IMAA-GIu.jpg-large

Yesterday, the producer told me that Angelina Jolie would be doing the voiceover for the Rowlands tribute video, reading whatever it was that I wrote. Jolie returning the favor to Rowlands, in other words. Friends honoring friends.

More full circle.

I am proud, sure, but mostly grateful and humble at the chance to, yet again, express what Gena Rowlands means to so so many, at an event devoted to doing just that.

A Lifetime of Work

ca. 1958 --- Actor Jose Ferrer and actress Gena Rowlands in a bathroom in 1958 film The High Cost of Love. Ferrer plays depressed manager Jim Fry and Rowlands his wife, Jenny Fry. --- Image by © John Springer Collection/CORBIS
With Jose Ferrer in The High Cost of Love, 1958. Director/Co-Star: José Ferrer

6232588_orig
In television series “Johnny Staccato”, 1959

genra_rowlands_ahhride
In “Alfred Hitchcock Presents” television series, 1960. Director: Arthur Hiller

a5ecf5766bcd11d1ba34a17f6da8e295
“87th Precinct”, television series, 1961-62

lonely-are-the-brave-04
“Lonely Are the Brave” 1962

011-gena-rowlands-theredlist
“The Spiral Road” 1962

Child-is-Waiting-Rowlands
“A Child is Waiting”, starring Judy Garland. Director: John Cassavetes. 1963

SWIB_(2)
“Bonanza” television series, 1963

019-alfred-hitchcock-presents-theredlist
“The Alfred Hitchcock Hour” television series, 1962-64

021-peyton-place-theredlist
“Peyton Place” television series, series regular. 1967.

faces6
“Faces,” 1968. Director: John Cassavetes

machine-gun-mccain-1969-001-john-cassavetes-gena-rowlands
“Machine Gun McCain”, television series, 1969

tumblr_m3232a8wZT1qfug8fo2_1280
“Minnie and Moskowitz”, 1971. Director: John Cassavetes

ScreenHunter_10+Dec.+04+23.45
“A Woman Under the Influence”, 1974. Nominated for Best Actress. Director: John Cassavetes

Colombo Playback 1975 Peter Falk Geena Rowland RŽal: Bernard L Kowalski COLLECTION CHRISTOPHEL
“Columbo” television series, 1965

on15
“Opening Night,” 1977. Director: John Cassavetes

tumblr_mlo9t7PQG31runk2uo1_500
“Strangers: Story of a Mother and Daughter”. TV movie with Bette Davis. 1979

tumblr_mo5udsEBWb1so0lpuo1_1280
“Gloria,” 1980. Nominated for Best Actress. Director: John Cassavetes.

NY-CL032_ARTSNY_P_20130704170930
“Tempest,” 1982. With John Cassevetes co-starring. Director: Paul Mazursky

hqdefault
Shelley Duvall’s “Faerie Tale Theatre” television series. 1983

love_streams1
“Love Streams,” 1984. Directed by John Cassavetes.

an-early-frost
“An Early Frost, groundbreaking TV movie about the AIDS epidemic.

tumblr_mbuhd9WwpL1qbewogo1_500
“The Betty Ford Story”, television movie. 1987.

Screen-Shot-2012-12-28-at-8.41.54-PM-1024x550
“Another Woman,” 1988. Director: Woody Allen

oncearound-rowlandsaielo.gif
With Danny Aiello in “Once Around,” 1991. Director: Lasse Hallström

Winona-Ryder-and-Gena-Rowlands-in-Night-on-Earth-1991
With Winona Ryder in “Night on Earth”, 1991. Director: Jim Jarmusch

bfi-00n-q7k
“The Neon Bible,” 1995. Director: Terence Davies

julia roberts Something to Talk About
With Kyra Sedgwick and Julia Roberts in “Something to Talk About”, 1995. Director: Lasse Hallström

UNHOOK THE STARS, Jake Lloyd, Gena Rowlands, 1996, (c)Miramax
“Unhook the Stars,” 1996. Directed by her son, Nick Cassavetes

shes_so_lovely_sean_penn_nick_cassavetes_001_jpg_tjsv
“She’s So Lovely,” 1997. Director: her son, Nick Cassavetes. Written by John Cassavetes.

Hope-Floats-movie-house-screened-porch-Gena-Rowlands
“Hope Floats,” 1998. Director: Forest Whitaker

Hysterical-Blindness-
“Hysterical Blindness,” HBO movie, 2002. Such an excellent film, and it reunited Rowlands with frequent Cassavetes collaborator Ben Gazzara. Director: Mira Nair

the-notebook-20
The smash-hit “The Notebook,” with James Garner, 2004. Director: her son Nick Cassavetes

Skeleton-Key-Gena-Rowlands-hit-a-straight-lick-with-a-crooked-stick
“The Skeleton Key,” 2004

paris_4
“Paris Je T’Aime”, again with Ben Gazzara, whom she had been co-starring with since the 1970s. Director: Gérard Depardieu

persepolispic2
“Persepolis” 2007. Voice of the mother

SIX DANCE LESSONS 72dpi 10x6
“Six Dance Lessons in Six Weeks”, 2014.

Posted in Actors | Tagged , , , | 36 Comments

Black Violin: Stereotypes

Kevin Sylvester and Wilner Baptiste are a violin-playing duo called Black Violin. They were profiled on NPR in September and I must have been so busy with Gilda I missed it. The article is well worth reading, about the challenges facing black violinists – challenges involving opportunity, I’m sure (but let’s be honest: there aren’t worlds of opportunity for ANY violinist, especially classical violinists – it’s competitive on a whole other level, since regular jobs in the field barely exist – it’s similar to ballet.). The fact remains, though, that a black male violinist is just not even in the cards when the word “violinist” is mentioned. But what these guys talk about mainly is challenging that preconceived notion that black people (especially tall huge black men) wouldn’t play classical violin. Their mere presence challenges preconceived notions and the two are fully aware of that. (This has been on my mind a bit anyway because of the thrilling rise of Misty Copeland, and how she faced similar preconceived notions about ballet.)

I caught up with Black Violin this morning, and the video above, of their song “Stereotypes” brought me to tears. It’s a gorgeously directed video (so many unforgettable images, an emotional collage) and keeps coming back to the shots of the two guys playing the violin at one another, and the joy they clearly have in what they are creating together.

The two men were raised playing classical violin (Sylvester says: “It started for me with Bach, ’cause Bach is the equalizer, you know?”) Having training in classical music basically means the two can do anything. (Anyone see the Metallica concert with the San Francisco Symphony Orchestra? Here’s Metallica playing “Enter Sandman” accompanied by the orchestra. )It is so exciting seeing all of those classically trained violinists playing the heaviest fastest metal music in the world. One of the violinists after that Metallica concert said that in all his career he had never had to change shirts during intermission due to sweating right through it.) Classical training, similar to ballet training, sets an artist up to be able to do anything. The building-blocks are so solid, the training so rigorous. To be any good at all, even minimally good, takes thousands and thousands of hours of practice.

Black Violin’s musical style is an exhilarating hybrid. Some of the chords almost sound bluegrass-y. The opening strains have an Eminem “Lose Yourself” echo. There’s a driving engine at work underneath. Their skill is astonishing. What a sound, what a song.

New fan right here, fellas. I want the whole album.

Posted in Music | Leave a comment

Announcement: The Criterion Collection’s January Release: Gilda (1946)

795_DVD_box_348x490_original

So this has been percolating for a couple of months, but wanted to hold off saying anything until Criterion made the announcement.

Criterion just announced their January 2016 releases and one of them is the classic twisted noir/movie-musical Gilda, the film that made Rita Hayworth not a star (because she already was that), but a SUPER-star.

Criterion asked me to write an essay on Gilda for the booklet that comes with the DVD/Blu-Ray. It was a really fun research project and it’s a favorite film of mine anyway, so the whole thing has been a blast.

The Criterion release date for Gilda is January 19, 2016.

And because it is as hot now as on the day it was first released in 1946, here’s Hayworth performing “Put the Blame on Mame” in Gilda. Unforgettable show-stopping dress by Jean Louis.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 18 Comments

I interview Reed Morano, director of Meadowland (2015)

meadowland_poster

Meadowland, directed by Reed Morano, and starring Luke Wilson and Olivia Wilde (with a supporting cast of Giovanni Ribisi, Elizabeth Moss, John Leguizamo, Juno Temple) was one of the standout features that I saw during this year’s Tribeca Film Festival. My original review of Meadowland on Rogerebert.com.

This week, I caught up with Reed Morano to chat about Meadowland. It is her first feature as a director and she also shot the film.

My interview with Reed Morano, director/cinematographer of Meadowland is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Meadowland opens in theatres today.

Posted in Directors, Movies | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

“A starchy version of Cinderella was shooting at Pinewood at the same time we were there. Its makers constantly complained that our mini-gangsters were running up and down the corridors, terrorising the Cinderella cast in their crinolines and powdered wigs.”

1831-b-bugsy-malone

I’m not sure if I can sufficiently describe how much the movie Bugsy Malone meant to me when I was a child. I didn’t see it in the theatre. It was playing on some local TV channel, and I watched the movie on the small fuzzy-image black-and-white television in the den downstairs. I couldn’t believe my eyes. I was around the age of all of the kids in it. I wanted to be in it. I wanted to live in it. I tried to make my hair have a “spit curl” like Jodie Foster’s. It helped launch an interest in the era of the 1920s, the Jazz Age, speakeasies, gun molls. I was 11.

So how happy am I to see this piece in The Guardian, with quotes from director Alan Parker and star Scott Baio: How We Made Bugsy Malone.

Posted in Movies | 6 Comments

Review: Crimson Peak (2015); d. Guillermo del Toro

large_large_pCj8zem1NDAODdtvha9WFEB6iWR

I have a LOT to say about Guillermo del Toro’s latest.

My four-star review of Crimson Peak is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 44 Comments

Happy Birthday, Lillian Gish

gish
While re-arranging my library, which meant removing many many books, I turned around and saw this tableau.

Not only did Lillian Gish get her start in the earliest days of cinema, helping to basically “invent” the closeup, under the direction of pioneer D.W. Griffith, she became one of the first modern-age super-stars (along with folks like Chaplin and all the silent comedians, Mary Pickford, Fairbanks, etc.). She had an innocent and open appeal, playing (often) damsels in distress. Her style was naturalistic and fresh, something one needed if the camera is going to be right up in your grill. If you watch Birth of a Nation (and if you can get past the racism and the “Yay for the KKK” ending – well, first, you should ask why you can get past it), you can see her almost single-handedly invent modern cinematic acting. The spontaneous private moments (her alone in her bedroom), the thoughtful pauses where the camera actually captures what is going on in her brain, the simplicity with which she expressed emotion. It’s not that the more declamatory pantomime-based acting style of the 19th century (and before that) is bad or “lesser.” That style was necessary in the days of live theatre where an actor had to reach the cheap seats! But with the eradication of the proscenium, another type of style needed to be developed. A style psychological and interior since the camera itself became the “proscenium” and in the new medium the proscenium could be an entire eyeball, seen in closeup, or whatever. Griffith got that. Gish was a perfect actress for this new kind of work.

So there’s that. Lillian Gish was a star in the teens of the 20th century, in films that still get play-time today (along with probably hundreds more). Griffith’s Way Down East, in 1920, is fantastic, and it includes a scene that is probably at least visually familiar to everyone, even if you haven’t seen the film. It’s a chase scene on a moving ice floe, and these two actors (Gish and the excellent Richard Barthelmess, who was so unforgettable almost 20 years later in Howard Hawks’ Only Angels Have Wings) are REALLY doing all of this stuff. Screw CGI.

It is one of the most exciting action scenes ever filmed. Here’s a post I wrote about it.

Gish continued working throughout her life, although the pace slowed in the 30s and 40s. The industry had changed so much in that time, but Gish still had a powerful recognition factor. She worked in the early days of live television. If you look at her IMDB page, there are no significant gaps in time. The Whales of August was her final film, in 1987, and even then – even then – when there weren’t many left alive on the planet who had experienced her in her heyday in the teens, there was an enormous nostalgia factor about her life, her career, her presence, her stature. She was a giant.

gish-1

Naturally her stuff with Griffith is what put her on the map. BUT in 1955, actor and first-time director Charles Laughton, put Gish into his creepy sui generis masterpiece, The Night of the Hunter. It was her greatest role. The film also has one of the best scenes in all of cinema, the “dueling” hymns scene, between Gish, on the porch, a Whistler’s Mother with a rifle, and Robert Mitchum, the killer waiting out in the yard to pounce. There has never been anything like this scene, before or since. Evil seems so irrevocable, yes? A force like a tornado, like night falling: it cannot be stopped. Night of the Hunter is practically nihilistic in its acceptance of Evil. But Gish’s character, a kindly old Christian lady who takes in stray children to care for them and raise them right, stands watch in the night.

The small frail female figure is the only thing keeping Evil at bay. She’s ready.

I have goosebumps just thinking about that scene.

Happy birthday, Lillian Gish!

8dtk31oggfw1wfo

Posted in Actors, On This Day | Tagged , | 5 Comments