Review: Bright Lights: Starring Carrie Fisher and Debbie Reynolds (2017)

large_large_cn7yegowjvlnruhdrpgmbxj3m8k

Premiering on HBO tomorrow. I won’t lie: this one HURTS to watch. Half the time, though, I was laughing through my tears.

My review of Bright Lights: Starring Carrie Fisher and Debbie Reynolds is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Review: Hidden Figures (2016)

large_large_6cbidzlfwutmttxtmni8mp3rnmg

A slightly re-edited post of what I put up on Facebook. Wanted to share here too because I want people to know how GOOD this movie is, and to SEE it, and to PAY MONEY to see it because money talks to The Powers That Be.

Hidden Figures runs circles – many many circles – laps and laps of circles – around a couple of the most highly-lauded films of the year. It runs circles in every way that counts: storytelling (visuals, music, editing choices), character development, script construction. EVERY scene matters. There’s a build, a flow. Nothing interrupts that flow. There’s a great build from repetition: you see the same situation multiple times throughout the film, and each time you see it, it has shifted just slightly, until finally by the end you realize that the situation has been changed entirely: total transformation. This is extremely effective in terms of how you Tell a Story.

hidden-figures

The three lead actresses – Taraji P. Henson, Octavia Spencer, and Janelle Monae – are superb. While Henson’s character’s journey, as a “computer” working (in a group 100% white and 100% male) to figure out the New Math required to get the astronauts back home after being in orbit, takes the majority of time, the journeys of the other two are essential to getting the full picture of the sheer scope of involvement of African-American women in NASA. It’s not just the story of one woman. Octavia Spencer plays Dorothy Vaughan, a woman with a mechanical bent (her father taught her), who oversees the group of “colored computers” hired by NASA in various capacities. It’s like a typing pool, only with math. Vaughan is a supervisor but in name only: she is not paid accordingly and does not have “supervisor” in her job title. She also realizes that that big IBM computer NASA is busy installing in a gigantic room may very well be a threat to her job security, so she sets out to teach herself programming because that’s where the jobs will be in the future. And Janelle Monae plays Mary Jackson, who realizes that in order to advance, she should probably get an engineering degree (she’s got a gift for it), but in order to get the degree, you need to take qualification classes, and the qualification classes are held at a whites-only school. So there’s your three-pronged structure to Hidden Figures.

1imdl-rcwddu9x4mzsnzgrw

screen_shot_2016-09-23_at_9-19-52_am-0-0

hidden-figures-movie-image-still

Hidden Figures has many cards it needs to deal: it needs to establish these characters, that world, it has to re-create those early NASA days, it has to show each of the three women and each of their very specific journeys, and it all has to feel like one thing. It succeeds in doing all of this. Theodore Melfi directed (and also co-wrote the adaptation of Margot Lee Shetterly’s book). Honestly, if the world were fair, Hidden Figures would be an Oscars sweep, in particular that script. Not to dismiss the contributions of the actresses, but that script is something else. I’d like to sit down with a hard copy of it and study it.

hidden-figures-hf-228_rgb-e1483623580966

Hidden Figures builds, block by block, to its end, where the sensation of triumph is so intense that I can still feel it right now, just thinking about it. It’s so triumphant that at the packed showing I saw at 9:25 a.m. (a packed movie theatre at 9:25 a.m. – just think about that.) – the entire audience erupted into applause at the end – when each of the real-life women got their own credit screen and we saw what happened to each one of them. The audience didn’t just burst into applause once. It applauded for the first name. The second name came, more applause. The third name came, more applause. Then came the final credit screen: title card and director’s name. A final round of applause. This was a spontaneous reaction from a paying audience. And only a critic would think that that was irrelevant or unimportant.

hiddenfigures-800x478-1

Listen, I loved some of those highly-lauded films of 2016 too (although two of them have already not worn well and I saw them a month ago). But not ONE of those prestige movies – two of which will probably win a bunch of Oscars – did what THIS one did: make a bunch of strangers on a Monday morning clap for 5 minutes straight for four successive credit screens.

hidden-numbers-trailer

Maybe it’s because my background is Show Biz, not criticism/film-studies. Coming from Show Biz, as I do, the notion that “crowd-pleasing” is somehow … a bad thing? … or a not-important thing? or that it means shallow and pandering and “light” … does not make sense to me. At all. Of course if you TRY to be “crowd pleasing” then yes, it can come off as pandering, or if the manipulation involved is too obvious (soundtrack choices, etc.) – if too much of that underlying structure shows, then yes, stop going for my heartstrings so obviously, Film. But “crowd-pleasing” as synonymous with pandering?

Let me break it down for you:

I want people who think “crowd-pleasing” is NOT a good thing to go to an open mic night, stand up in front of an audience, and tell a bunch of jokes. Or prepare a Shakespearean monologue and audition for a community theatre production in your town. Whatever: I want these people to prepare something and then get up in front of a crowd and deliver it. I want them to experience the PANIC you feel when you stand up in front of people and whatever it is you are doing doesn’t land, doesn’t go well. I want them to experience the self-loathing, the terror, the Flight Response of standing up in front of a crowd and NOT pleasing the crowd in any way whatsoever. Maybe if they actually experienced something like this they wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss “crowd-pleasing” as “lesser than” the Oh So Serious Prestigious Fare, or to make the COMPLETELY INCORRECT assumption that making something “crowd-pleasing” is easy.

taraji-p-henson-fights-for-equality-in-hidden-figures

Hidden Figures does everything right and it does it at such a high level of competence and skill that not once did I feel its 2+ hour running time. I prefer movies to be shorter and I think most movies SHOULD be shorter. But Hidden Figures really NEEDS every single one of its scenes for the build it creates. There was no “fat” on this thing: every single section was necessary. I mean, you don’t watch Seven Samurai and think, “This would be much better if it were 85 minutes long.” There is nothing extraneous. Hidden Figures was one of the best films of the year – and now that I’ve seen it, that AV Club review is even more egregious. And don’t get me started on the review in Film Stage. And no I won’t provide the links because they don’t deserve the traffic. Fuck them. Like I always say, There is such a thing as a wrong opinion.

tumblr_inline_oc2ah202qz1rws1o8_540

So let’s hear it for Hidden Figures, a film that understands how to tell a story in the way classic Hollywood understood. Give the public what they want. Give them characters they can grasp onto, conflicts they can engage in, catharsis after a long struggle. Make them clap for 5 minutes on a rainy Monday morning.

Not every work of art is MEANT to be crowd-pleasing. Many of my favorite movies don’t give a shit what I think. But to please a crowd – the way this movie pleased the crowd I was in when I saw it – is

1. an important and essential goal in this Business we call Show
and
2. NOT AS EASY AS IT LOOKS.

Please see this film. And read my friend Odie’s review.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 12 Comments

For Film Comment: On Faulkner’s Tomorrow (1972), starring Robert Duvall

tomorrow308

I wrote about the 1972 film Tomorrow, a Horton Foote adaptation of a William Faulkner story, starring Robert Duvall (same year as The Godfather) for Film Comment. It’s screening on TCM this month. Years ago, I remember my father talking to me about Duvall’s performance in this, only my dad couldn’t remember the title, and I hadn’t seen it yet and there was no Internet so I couldn’t help him out. But Dad had such a love for this performance. He may not have remembered the title, but he remembered the plot, and boy, did he remember Duvall. Years later I saw the film and realized within the first 5 minutes that this was the movie Dad had been talking about.

Today is Robert Duvall’s birthday as well, so the whole assignment has had a very pleasing symmetry.

Here’s my Film Comment essay on Tomorrow (1972).

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | 19 Comments

December 2016 Viewing Diary

Supernatural, Season 7, Episode 22, “There Will Be Blood” (2012; d. Guy Norman Bee)
I had started a re-watch of Season 7 in November, so I finished it out this month. Season 7 was one of my least favorites, when I first watched it. I didn’t find the Leviathans scary. I found the whole concept not only rather silly but also judgmental and didactic in a way that doesn’t suit the show at ALL. Also, the whole season is about what the Leviathans are PLANNING, not what they are actually DOING. I still feel all of these things. But it’s a much stronger season than I remembered, in particular all of the smaller Arcs embedded in that larger one. It’s a very strong season in terms of the complexity of that main relationship. Plus: Charlie! And Garth! This particular episode has one of the creepiest scenarios the show has ever attempted. That pink room. The child sex-trafficking – not even implied, there it is front and center. It’s very upsetting.

Supernatural, Season 7, Episode 23, “Survival of the Fittest” (2012; d. Robert Singer)
I LOVED the ending of Season 7. I can’t believe I didn’t see it coming, what with Purgatory this and Purgatory that throughout the season, but there we have it. Yet another example of how effective Supernatural can be, with almost no special effects (that is, it can be effective when it chooses to be. When it gets lazy? The whole thing falls apart precipitously.)

Supernatural, Season 8, Episode 1, “We Need to Talk about Kevin” (2012; d. Robert Singer)
Season 8 is the weakest season (well, until Season 12 came along). There are some excellent things – mainly the Men of Letters reveal, plus the Bunker reveal. (And I am so over the Bunker at this point that I want to destroy it myself.) HOWEVER. The Dean-PTSD stuff is brilliant, and Ackles is brilliant. His understanding of it, the jumpiness and nerviness of the condition, the high-alert-threat mindset … it changes his demeanor completely. Now, that’s in the story itself but it wouldn’t work without his commitment to it. Season 8 is basically the season where both Sam and Dean get girlfriends and then break up with them. Sam dates Amelia (seen through a lemon-lime Lysol haze) and Dean dates a male vampire. And both Sam and Dean are whiny bitches about the other’s partner. I love the symmetry of it. Charlie clocks it, and Dean looks confused. Good stuff.

Supernatural, Season 3, Episode 2, “The Kids are All Right” (2007; d. Philip Sgriccia)
A re-watch for my next re-cap, whenever that will be. I love this episode. It’s a great one-off monster episode, and it sneakily establishes an Arc that will not come to fruition until Season SIX. PATIENCE.

Tower (2016; d. Keith Maitland)
One of the best films of the year. Unfortunately, a Top 10 only allows 10 entries. (Duh.) So some things had to be left off my Top 10. Regardless. This has been a great year for documentaries – the O.J. Doc, and 13th alone – but Tower is stunning. I’ve seen it a couple of times now, once with Allison, because I knew she would love it.

The Piano Teacher (2001; d. Michael Haneke)
I think I’m a fucked up individual and then I watch this and realize, “I’m doing pretty okay, actually.”

Hell or High Water (2016; d. David Mackenzie)
This movie has been a Little Engine That Could. A so-called “indie.” With a couple of stars in it (Jeff Bridges and Chris Pine), but not made for a lot of money. It has made back its money ten-fold, one of the most profitable indies of the year (and maybe even one of the most profitable movies, if you consider its small budget). Like Tower, I wanted to put this on my Top 10. If I had done a Top 20, it would have been on it. Every moment, every scene, every performance … gorgeous. An old-fashioned movie. Outlaws and lawmen. Standoffs and shootouts (one being a direct steal from High Sierra). But grounded in character and relationship. I absolutely loved this movie.

Supernatural, Season 12, Episode 7, “Rock Never Dies” (2016; d. Eduardo Sánchez)
The less said about this the better. I am actually kind of shocked that many fans seem to love this one. I thought it was horrendous. Embarrassingly so. Season 12 is made by people who appear to never have watched the former seasons. Or, they know the lyrics but they don’t hear the music. This entire situation has actually been upsetting me, so I haven’t been writing much about it.

Dear John (2010; d. Lasse Hallström)
My sister told me to watch this, after an indepth and lengthy discussion about our shared love of Channing Tatum. I hadn’t realized that Hallström directed it, and I love him! One of the best things about this movie, which I really enjoyed, was the father-son relationship (although how Richard Jenkins could have spawned Channing is one of the mysteries of Movie Magic). I also cried every single time Amanda Seyfried (who exudes kindness: watch the special features for Mean Girls. In her interview, she tears up when she talks about bullying in high school.) interacted with Richard Jenkins. I loved the coin sub-plot. And Channing is great. No surprise. He’s one of the best things going right now.

The Babadook (2014; d. Jennifer Kent)
Showing this movie to Jen, who had never seen it, was one of the great viewing pleasures this past month. She and I are horror movie buddies. We were hanging out at her house, I started talking about The Babadook, and whaddya know, it was streaming. I wrote about my initial reaction, and on a re-watch, and after discussing with Jen, I now think it’s a masterpiece. Mainly because of the final sequence. If it weren’t for that final sequence, if Kent had decided to end it with a vanquishing of The Babadook and a happy “now we can be happy” ending, it would have been fine, but it would have lacked the hugely suggestive (and redeeming, in my opinion) depth that it has. Kent fought HARD for that ending, and I’m not surprised to hear that nobody in The Powers That Be liked the ending. Because money-and-marketing people are stupid cowards who have absorbed conventionality and love-of-safety into their hearts through their bloodstream. Kent was after something DIFFERENT, something much much TOUGHER. The Babadook actually validates some of my own most personal ideas about life, things that nobody wants to hear. I almost can’t believe it exists, something this tough-minded. If you don’t re-think your own responses in your own life to terrible events … if you don’t wonder if you might be making some incorrect assumptions about your reaction to trauma … then The Babadook hasn’t done its job. Jen texted me the next day: “At the dog park, I found myself talking about The Babadook for 10 minutes to someone who hasn’t seen it.” Yup. The movie’ll do that.

All We Had (2016; d. Katie Holmes)
Katie Holmes’ directorial debut. I didn’t really care for it. Low stakes. I reviewed for Ebert.

Weekend (1967; d. Jean-Luc Godard)
Of all of his movies, this is the one that most obsesses me. I go back to it again and again. It’s hilarious, first of all. That long-take scene of the traffic jam is a masterpiece. But it’s his whole VISION that is so dauntingly brilliant.

Supernatural, Season 5, Episode 21, “Two Minutes to Midnight” (2010; d. Phil Sgriccia)
In terms of a season-wide Arc, Season 5 is the best, the most intricate, the most fascinating. There are so many elements to it, not to mention that both brothers spend the entire season in a state of anxiety about being raped by the OTHER brothers, the celestial ones. The series’ obsession with penetration, consent and co-option has never been as clear as that.

Personal Shopper (2016, but coming out in 2017; d. Olivier Assayas)
I had hoped this would “count” for 2016, in terms of lists, but it doesn’t. It’s being released in March 2017. One of my favorite movies I’ve seen this year. Kristen Stewart: she cannot stop being awesome. What a couple of years she’s had. And she’s still so young. So much more to look forward to. And her CHOICES for projects!! So impressive and strange and intuitive. She’s the real deal. Personal Shopper is the second collaboration between Assayas and Stewart (the first one being the magnificent Clouds of Sils Maria), and in it, Stewart plays a similar type of character. A gofer, a Girl Friday, peripheral to the giant egos of the ones she serves. There’s a lot in Personal Shopper, many elements, but my main takeaway is how unnervingly creepy it is.

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (1970; d. Russ Meyer)
Famously, Roger Ebert wrote the screenplay. I love the movie and thought it was great that Criterion decided to release it. There were some howls from snobs (“Bottom of the barrel, huh, Criterion?” I saw someone complain on Twitter, and etc.) Dear snooty-snoots, culture is made up of all kinds of things, there’s a whole WORLD out there. I bought the Criterion version and had a blast re-watching. My pal Glenn Kenny wrote the essay for the release, and it’s a must-read.

Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath (2016)
I’ve seen each episode thus far. I can’t even believe the world has changed so much that this series is even occurring. Anyone who has read me for any length of time knows my history with the cult, and my obsession with it. It pre-dates South Park and “You’re so glib, Matt.” I am so enmeshed in it that I still hesitate to put that word on my site, since once upon a time I started getting a lot of traffic from Clearwater, Florida, and I got afraid that they were going to come after me. Leah Remini is a HERO. Not only is she bringing these stories to light (of well-known people – at least well-known in the cult-critic circles, of which I am a part – like Amy Scobee and Mike Rinder) – stories that have been published elsewhere, but you’d have to be really obsessed as I am – but she admits HER part in keeping this cult alive, and she is open about the fact that the series is, in some part, an act of redress. Man, Scientology pissed off the wrong woman when they pissed off Leah Remini.

13th (2016; d. Ava DuVernay)
One of THE viewing experiences of the year. 13th and I, Daniel Blake left me literally trembling with rage.

The Wave (2015; d. Roar Uthaug)
I had been meaning to see this on the big screen during its release last year (seems like it needs a big screen) but I missed it. It was streaming on Netflix. The story of Geirangerfjord, a famous fjord in Norway. It’s inevitable that one day the deteriorating cliffs will crumble into the fjord, causing a tsunami that will wipe out everybody in just 10 minutes. The Wave is one of those worst-case-scenario fantasies that help give voice to anxieties floating around in the air. The wave itself is 25 stories high (so frightening) and stunningly done. It’s got all the elements it needs: a frantic and obsessed geologist who KNOWS that something is wrong with the readings they’re getting, and he’s the ONLY one who takes it seriously. He and his family are about to move out of the area because he got another job, but the weird readings from the mountains keep him stuck, and his family … who are then directly in the wave’s path. Really effective.

East of Eden (1981; d. Harvey Hart)
Not the Kazan movie, but the 1981 mini-series, which I actually remember because I read the book right around that time, based on my OBSESSION with the 1955 movie, and Elia Kazan, and James Dean. Unlike the film, the mini series takes on the whole story, three generations worth. But without the underlying Steinbeck-ian themes of loss and memory and morality and free will, not to mention his VOICE … it’s just a soap opera. The mini series is embarrassing. The two male leads are terrible. It’s great to see Warren Oates as Cyrus! Jane Seymour does some interesting things as Cathy, but it’s still not the Cathy in the book. That special something, the Steinbeckian something, is missing. Watched it for research. A real slog.

No Home Movie (2016; d. Chantal Akerman)
On my Top 10 of the year.

The Nice Guys (2016; d. Shane Black)
Also a strong contender for my Top 10 of the year. A couple of days ago there was a kerfluffle on Twitter among a group of male film critics, arguing about whether or not the portrayal of women in this movie – especially the scene of the naked porn star (“porno young lady” as Gosling’s character says) on the hood of the car – was offensive to women. I should have gotten involved. But I have no desire to argue on Twitter, especially not in that particular scenario. A lot of women noticed the conversation too and their response seemed to be along the lines of, “I don’t want to hear men telling me what isn’t offensive.” Fair point. Neither do I! But MY point goes a bit deeper: “I don’t want to hear men telling me what IS offensive, either.” And I don’t want WOMEN telling me what I should (or should not) find “offensive” either. In fact, while we’re at it, I am sick of the concept of “offensive”, in general, because it’s such a …. polite word. PTA-polite. Suburban mainstream polite. It’s sniffing a nasty smell and going for the air freshener. If something rubs me the wrong way, I try to find another word to describe my reaction. Something not so … prissy and fucking middle class respectable. If the middle-class were in charge, there would be no revolutionary art, no bravery, no ambivalence and ambiguity. (And we’re basically there already.) Sex would be vanilla and everyone would be clothed properly and be lovely to one another, never rude or snippy or obnoxious. The values of the middle class say “Don’t rock the boat” “Play well with others.” Okay, fine, that works on the playground but it does not work with art, because most great art does not play well with others. If I think something doesn’t work, then there are other words to use than “This is offensive.” Offensive to WHOM, I ask? And if I’m NOT offended, does that mean I’m brainwashed by the patriarchy or matriarchy or whatever group thinks it has the Truth? So having a bunch of men talking about how offensive that scene was in its portrayal of women rubbed me the wrong fucking way. Mainly because of its assumption that all women were probably offended by it. I guess I’m not a woman then, because I was delighted and horrified by that scene. In it are many of Shane Black’s obsessions: innocence and corruption, violence and vulnerability, sex as Product and sex as human life-force. She looked gorgeous on that car – I’m not afraid to admit it, that’s part of the destabilizing beauty of that moment – but also terrifyingly vulnerable. I am sensitive to cruel and toxic objectification and sorry, boys, but that ain’t it. Or maybe it is to you but do NOT assume that every woman must/should/does feel the same way about it. I’m a woman and I know what sexual vulnerability is about. Being reveled in and adored when I’m naked, and also being afraid when I’m naked: I have experienced both. And all of that is there in that small moment, including my own projections onto her beautiful body, which I’m sure was deliberate on the part of Shane Black. My problem with the women’s side of this conversation is a constant as well, although the men bickering about whether or not it was offensive embarrassed me for them. But I am equally turned off by women who assume that because something “offends” them it must offend ALL women (the implication being “all right-thinking enlightened women”.) In this particular scenario, both genders (at least the mouthpieces I’m talking about here) assume that women’s responses are monolithic. I saw this this year in the initial reaction to Elle: a lot of the outraged women on Twitter were saying “No woman could accept this movie” “No woman would act like this” “Men should be barred from making movies about rape” – these comments, to me, were more scary than the movie itself. Comments like this are used (albeit unconsciously probably) as an intimidation tactic. I don’t intimidate easily. But comments like that do not promote discussion. Comments like that want there to be NO discussion, except among those who agree 100%, and that is totalitarian. Additionally: When men jump into the fray, arguing about how offensive something is to women, they are White Knighting for us, and so often – SO SO OFTEN – White Knights get shit wrong. I’ve experienced it in person. Some man says, “My God, that movie was offensive to women” and I say, “Really? How so? I loved it!” And then everything gets very awkward. Especially since I’m a woman. These men STILL treat women as “other”. They don’t know how to listen to us. And so they assume they know what we’re all about, because we all are somehow the same. I’m not saying they do this deliberately. They mean well, most of the time. But all I will say is: Do better. Moments like this have an “I’m protecting your honor” subtext. Honor? Please. “Honor” is just another way women have been held down and held back: you men clashing your big phallic swords to protect our honor. Same shit. And so these current-day White Knights are just exhibiting a patriarchal mindset, a condescending, “Never fear, Ladies, we’ve got your back!!” The attitude echoes Paul Ryan’s “Women should be championed and revered” comment. These White Knights don’t know they’re doing it. They believe they are allies. They don’t think they are sexist. They think that good ol’ boys and dudebros are the sexist ones, not THEM. They should know that I have experienced more misogyny – exponentially – from nerds and geek-boys than I EVER have from good ol’ boys and dudebros. Gimme a Dudebro over a White Knight any day of the week. Look, women NEED allies. Support is totally appreciated. But do not assume that you know how ALL women think – because by assuming, you are acting like a Douchebag Man Who Doesn’t Listen to Women, just like all the supposed “dudebros” you abhor. What “offends” one woman may not “offend” another, and hopefully your mind won’t explode trying to contain those contradictions. (Same goes for you, too, women.) Unbelievable, I know: women don’t all think alike! What is this world coming to? All of this is to say that I fucking loved The Nice Guys and was not “offended” by one thing in it. As a matter of fact, the main takeaway for me is its old-fashioned sweetness and its care for the characters. Loved it in the theatre, and wondered if it would hold up. Bought a copy, watched again, and was so happy to see that it did. A movie like this hits so many sweet spots for me.

Supernatural, Season 12, Episode 8, “Lotus” (2016; d. Philip Sgriccia)
This episode pissed me off. Horrible. Misguided. Tone-deaf. All surface, no subtext. Lazy. Unforgivable. I’m actually going easy on it with these comments.

The Bishop’s Wife (1947; d. Henry Koster)
Watched while I was in Chicago. Snowy day. In Mitchell’s cozy nook. Neither of us know how many times we’ve seen the movie. We know the sequence by heart. The start of the big Gladys Cooper scene, Mitchell said, “Here we go.” We both cried at the same spots. We paused to discuss. I so want to go to that skating rink. Magic.

A Letter to Three Wives (1949; d. Joseph L. Mankiewicz)
Another favorite, watched with Mitchell. For more indepth thoughts on the film, please read my friend Stevie’s comments on this post.

Seven Samurai (1954; d. Akira Kurosawa)
I cannot imagine what it must have been like in the 1950s to have the films of Kurosawa start to wash up on American shores. The films still astonish and terrify, they are awe-inspiring accomplishments. Seven Samurai is a stunning and exciting action film, taking place over 3 hours, but it zips by so quickly it’s almost a disappointment when it ends. The crowd fight scenes are thrilling, and the characters are unforgettable. The final shot is epic. Recently, Glenn Kenny reviewed Mifune: The Last Samurai, a documentary about brilliant actor Toshiro Mifune, which Kenny thought was a kind of Mifune For Dummies. Not for those who loved him and were obsessed by him (and our numbers are legion). In the review, Glenn sums up his issues with it in the following paragraph: Mifune: The Last Samurai,” a documentary on the actor directed by Steven Okazaki and narrated by Keanu Reeves (the script is by Okazaki and Stuart Galbraith IV) got off on a somewhat bad foot for me. Explaining Mifune’s place in the firmament of pop culture, the narration says of his collaborations with director Akira Kurosawa, “without them there would have been no ‘Magnificent Seven.’” This is factually true but seems to me to throw out a very crucial baby with the bathwater. What makes Kurosawa and Mifune crucial is that without them there would be no “Seven Samurai.” Thank you, Glenn.

Swiss Army Man (2016; d. Dan Kwan and Daniel Scheinert)
I can’t say enough good stuff about this movie. I resisted it at first, mainly because the reviews coming out of festivals were so rapturous. Why do I do this to myself? I can’t help it. I’m a spiky pissed-off woman with a female Irish pirate for an ancestor. Just like her, I don’t play well with others. I withhold until I’m damn well ready to check it out for myself. As so often happens, I watched and fell in love with it. (But it often goes the other way too. Exhibit A: Me and Earl and the Dying Girl. Once I watched that shitshow, the hype that came out of Sundance made me think: “Was it the elevation that brought on the rapture? Because … ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?”) Anyway, Swiss Army Man was one of my favorite films this year, and since it was such a strong year, it couldn’t go on my Top 10. What a profound and beautiful film. What an exploration of human life – our bodies, their embarrassments, their responses – but, and even more profoundly, what an exploration of male relationships, an exploration of the possibilities in male intimacy. Not sexual, although that might be a part of it – and the fact that I have to say “not sexual” is indicative of the problem. Intimacy between men, love, friendship, adoration … is still seen as extremely threatening, and it’s fucked us UP. It’s the final frontier. I really liked Annie Julia Wyman’s essay on it in the LA Review of Books.

Patriots Day (2016; d. Peter Berg)
Reviewed for Ebert.

In a Lonely Place (1950; d. Nicholas Ray)
1. One of my favorite movies.
2. My favorite Bogart performance.
3. One of the best – and most brutal and cynical – movies about Hollywood in existence.
Everyone was so excited when Criterion decided to release it. I bought a copy finally and gloried in it, and all of the special features, for hours. My friend Imogen Smith wrote the beautiful essay.

This Is Us, Season 1, Pilot (2016; d. Glenn Ficarra, John Requa)
Allison made me watch the pilot. This is what she and I do: force one another to watch things. And neither of us are ever sorry. I am so out of the TV Loop that this had not struck my radar. It’s absolutely lovely. I will continue to watch! Beautiful acting, too. It made me cry a couple of times. Well played.

A Letter to Elia (2010; d. Martin Scorsese)
A re-watch for this big piece I’m researching. My feelings about Elia Kazan are well-documented on this site, not to mention the unforgettable night when I met him, so I’ve been having such a good time with this research project. Scorsese talking about his personal reaction to East of Eden makes me tear up.

Where Danger Lives (1950; d. John Farrow)
A fascinating film starring Robert Mitchum as a doctor (yum), who gets embroiled with what appears to be a poor little rich girl (played by Faith Domergue), who then turns out to be lying in order to reel in the good doctor. Claude Rains is deliciously evil, in such a cool and smiling and unruffled way. The mood of the movie is out of its mind. So paranoid, so richly sexual.

Tension (1949; d. John Berry)
I love this movie! Nerdy pharmacist (Richard Basehart) married to Hot-Babe Malcontent (Audrey Totter) ends up changing his name/entire personality in order to get his revenge. Once he takes on the new personality, all kinds of other things start changing for him. He also meets an adorable amateur photographer played by Cyd Charisse. The sexually sick implications in Tension, especially in regards to the marriage, and how she keeps him reeled in, despite the fact that she humiliates him constantly, are so strong that you almost want to look away.

The Fall (2013-2016; created by Allan Cubitt)
I binge-watched the entire three seasons this past month. It has multiple things I adore and NEED in my life: Gillian Anderson. John Lynch. A variety of Irish accents. A sexually sadistic serial killer. Belfast locations. Compulsively watchable, for many reasons. The acting is top-notch, across the board. Jamie Dornan gives a very creepy portrayal of obsession: watch how his face changes when he’s preparing or re-living or lost in his thoughts. It’s a whole different thing than the passive benign husband/father thing he’s got going on. Gillian Anderson, though … What I love about the performance is its chilly blend of competence and messy complexity. Her whispery voice. Her cold eyes. The outfits. Her absolute unconcern with how she’s regarded. But it’s very well-written because the majority of her backstory is left unspoken. And the glimpses we do get are startling, and you have to hurriedly incorporate them into your understanding of the character. A reminder that nobody – NOBODY – is what they seem. On an actress level, the performance is “campy” but not in the overused sense of the word. It’s high camp. It’s baroque camp. It’s reveling in the surface of it: the heels, the silky blouses, the curves of her hips in those tight skirts, the paleness of her skin, etc. Anderson knows that the surface will be the main component of the character. And it is only through the meticulous creation of and maintaining of that surface that we’ll get the revelatory “Oh wow” feeling when the cracks start to show. But surface is ALL. This is the kind of acting that used to be par for the course in the 1930s and 40s. It’s out of style now, more’s the pity. But this? This is what it looks like. There’s honestly nothing better. I so enjoyed watching her work.

20th Century Women (2016; d. Mike Mills)
I’ve seen it twice now. My 4-star review for Ebert.

Hail, Caesar! (2016; d. The Coen brothers)
“Before you say your line, just give a … a mirthless chuckle.” [Pause filled with the dead air of incomprehension. Then:] “A mirthless chuckle?” “Yes, just a mirthless chuckle.” And watching how that poor actor interprets what “a mirthless chuckle” should look like is one of the funniest moments in film this year. I love every second of this film. Should have been on my Top 10, but what are you gonna do.

Christmas, Again (2015; d. Charles Poekel)
I reviewed this beautiful movie when it came out and thought I’d revisit. It’s somewhat hard to track down. I think I found it streaming on Amazon Prime. It’s so delicate, you might make the mistake of thinking this is just a “slice of life” movie. It’s not. I loved it even more the second time. I saw even more than I perceived when I saw it originally. It got DEEPER.

Beginners (2010; d. Mike Mills)
I re-watched this in preparation for my 20th Century Women review. I loved it first time around, although my main takeaway was not Christopher Plummer but the love story between Ewan McGregor and Melanie Laurent (in particular that first scene at the costume party which I think is just beautifully conceived and carried out). Beginners is about Mills’ father and 20th Century Women is about his mother. The “quirks” in Beginners have vanished in his second movie, a giant leap forward. Mills is young, too. This is exciting because we can expect much more from him. He’s got “it.” Or what I consider to be “it” which is an ear for dialogue and a devotion to people. Not much happens in his movies. There’s an inciting event (“Wow, my dad came out of the closet at 75 years of age”), but after that … it’s chaos. There’s a kind of James Brooks-ish all-over-the-place thing going on, and I like that. I don’t care about plot. Please just give me interesting characters!

Tomorrow (1972; d. Joseph Anthony)
Early Duvall: in between To Kill a Mockingbird and The Godfather – released the same year as Tomorrow. This movie was a favorite of my dad’s, in particular Duvall’s performance. I remember the first time he spoke of it to me. I hadn’t seen the movie, and Dad couldn’t remember the name of the movie, but he described the character and the performance, even some of the scenes, with vivid detail. It made a huge impression. I re-watched this (and boy is it hard to find) for another project I was working on. It’ll be screening on TCM this month and I highly recommend checking it out if you haven’t seen it.

Ninotchka (1939; d. Ernst Lubitsch)
If there’s such a thing as a perfect movie, Ninotchka is it. Greta Garbo is such a brilliant comedienne. Her deadpan is so dead that it goes to her very soul. Until it cracks. Every line reading is hilarious to me. The film is breathlessly passionate. Gorgeous love scenes. Eerily upsetting, in terms of what would happen in Europe that year, and through the next 4 years. The Eiffel Tower. The civilization of France. The semi-comedic treatment of Communists. (I love the scenes back in Russia in the communal apartments.) I watch this movie and get swept away every single time.

Fences (2016; d. Denzel Washington)
Denzel Washington directs a film adaptation of the great American play, August Wilson’s Fences. Washington has transferred the Broadway production (which brought both him and Viola Davis Tony’s, and rightfully so) to the screen with loving care. He wants us to hear these words, dammit. LISTEN to the prose of one of the great theatrical masters. So silly, these film nerds who complain that it’s not cinematic enough, that it feels like an adaptation, that it feels like a play. Maybe it feels like a play because it IS a play? So, are you saying that if Denzel Washington crowded up the screen with gizmo-moves and Steadicam-moves and twisty-twirly tracking shots, you would have deigned to give the movie the attention it deserves? I’m being harsh, but these people do not live in the real world, and by real world I mean the world where audiences come into a dark space, as one, to watch – and LISTEN TO – a story being told. Listen, I love good camera work and shot construction. But sometimes camera work is a distraction, unnecessary, a show-off. Fences is a great piece of writing, and Washington has done all of us a great service by presenting it to us plainly and simply. It is not visually uninteresting, but that backyard really IS a stage – in the play and in the movie – where people come out and make their points, tell stories, fight it out. Washington has not made the mistake of “opening up the script” like you’re supposed to do. It’s a great great play. Why mess with it? “Film is a visual medium,” drones some nerd who has never created anything in his life. (I’m on a roll this morning with the rants. It’s 2017. Let’s start strong.) YES. Film IS a visual medium, and so sometimes that means Andrei Tarkovsky, sometimes it means Chantal Akerman, sometimes it means P.T. Anderson, and sometimes it means putting the camera in the best spot and letting the actor/words be the star. It’s such a joy to see these actors work, as painful as this story is. There’s a lovely elegiac feeling to some of it, like you can sense August Wilson looking back on something, considering another era, one in which he grew up, the neighborhood he knew, the people he knew. This is what happened. This is who we were. Seeing Washington, one of our greatest actors, as Troy – the one-time Negro League star, now bitter, a bully to his son, a tough man, a principled man who betrays his own principles, a garrulous story-teller … God, it was satisfying! His physical work was extraordinary too: you could see the athlete he once was, but you could also see that those muscles were going to fat, that his back was atrophying from crouching on the side of that garbage truck, that this is a man facing mortality and hating every second of it. Viola Davis is a miracle. To complain that this film is uncinematic – even when you are being blessed with the enriching miracle of a performance like hers – represents an attitude of base ingratitude (not to mention a misunderstanding of what movies are actually FOR, at their most simplistic level.) Superb. I didn’t see this soon enough to put it on any list. One of the best films of the year.

To Be or Not To Be (1942; d. Ernst Lubitsch)
So subversive that it couldn’t exist now! It was subversive then too but the atmosphere is even worse now, when Humorlessness reigns supreme. Look at the brou-haha about The Interview, with the studio caving into the threats from the Self-Appointed Policemen who didn’t want ANY of us to see the movie since THEY were offended by it (that word again!) even though none of these people had even SEEN it yet. “But I’ve HEARD about it and it sounds OFFENSIVE.” Thanks, but I’ll make up my own mind. To Be or Not To Be was made right as America was getting herself involved in the war in Europe – which makes the film’s attitude – not to mention its plot – that much more out-there and courageous. It’s “Springtime for Hitler” almost 30 years before The Producers. It’s “Springtime for Hitler” WHILE Hitler was on the loose. Mr. Lubitsch, you’ve got some nerve. It’s also laugh-out-loud funny. Screwball slapstick. Nazis. Jack Benny. Sooooo funny. A young Robert Stack getting up to leave the theatre every time Benny begins the “To be or not to be” speech which – classic Lubitsch – pays off hugely in the final moment. Carole Lombard: every gesture, eyebrow raise, line-reading: perfection. An actor impersonating Hitler out in the streets of Warsaw. A nefarious plot to infiltrate a Nazi gala affair … there are a couple of scenes that Tarantino lifted wholesale into Inglourious Basterds. A hilarious movie with brass balls.

East of Eden (1955; d. Elia Kazan)
For that research thing I keep mentioning. I won’t name what it is but it’s probably pretty obvious by now. I have seen this movie many many many times, and I can say – with little exaggeration – that seeing it when I was babysitting, age 12, changed the course of my life. I always think of that when I go back to see it again. I have such personal feelings all wrapped up in it. But still: it’s a gorgeous piece of film-making from Kazan, in particular the colors, and his fluid use of Cinemascope – not an easy feat. He pulls it off. Back to the Fences conversation: there is not one uninteresting shot here. It’s not just Kazan showing off. He had many challenges facing him, in particular how to tell this personal intimate story about a father and two sons without a lot of closeups, since closeups don’t really work in Cinemascope. The emotion, then, the power of the emotion, is in his framing, his use of colors, the way he tilts the camera sometimes – yes, calling attention to itself – but always serving the story. It’s heightened overblown 1950s melodrama and much of it has nothing to do with what Steinbeck wrote (or very little, let’s say that), but it’s a clearly personal piece of work, as most of Kazan’s films are. James Dean is so compelling and captivating you can’t believe it’s his debut. The second he shows up, it’s obvious: That’s a star. Now I can say that because I know how it all turned out, but apparently in the early screenings, the second the camera came to rest on him in that opening sequence, him sitting crouched on the sidewalk curb, the teenage girls in the audience flipped ….. OUT. Instant recognition: THAT. I WANT THAT. GIMME GIMME. Not every hot young actor causes that kind of reaction just from sitting on a sidewalk curb, but Dean did.

Justified, Season 1, Episodes 1 – 12 (2010; created by Graham Yost)
Jessie. Helena. Help me. HELP ME TO BEAR IT. I love it so much I’m having heart palpitations. I’m so excited that I have 5 more seasons to go. I can’t wait for my cousin to show up! It’s so good. The first episode practically brought me to orgasm. And on that note …

Posted in Monthly Viewing Diary, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 148 Comments

Year in Review: Running my mouth in 2016

I look at this and I wonder why I always feel like I haven’t done jack-squat. Or, at the very least, I could do more. Well, I always can do more. Regardless, here are links to some of the things I’ve written this year. Not just film writing, but stuff here too.

Interview with Stephen Cone on “Henry Gamble’s Birthday Party”
“Evangelical America doesn’t even celebrate heterosexual sexuality! When you grow up in that environment, you end up with a lot of really lonely adults. There’s a lot of really beautiful qualities to the Southern Evangelical world, which is the world I grew up in. My father is a pastor, so it’s a world I love in a lot of ways, but one of the ugly parts of it is the lack of emphasis on the importance of pleasure and joy.”

Review of Henry Gamble’s Birthday Party (2016), directed by Stephen Cone
“Grace’s continual longing to go in the pool, and her fear of her mother’s judgment if she did, as well as her fear of how much she WANTS to go in that pool, is its own ongoing cliffhanger.”

R.I.P. David Bowie
“He embodied possibility. He was true to himself and part of that meant willingness to change. Not even willingness: he had to change, because he was alive. And human beings are not static. And performers must please themselves first. And as he changed, his persona broadened, and as his persona broadened, more and more people were drawn into it, more and more people could relate to it, were fascinated by it, felt the possibility in it. If he could be so flexible, then couldn’t we? Maybe? Maybe identity isn’t static. Maybe gender isn’t static. Maybe none of us are as trapped as we thought.”

“Animals don’t hate, and we’re supposed to be better than them.” – Elvis Presley, the Twin Who Lived
“Where those fairgrounds once were is now the main square in Tupelo in front of City Hall: a vast lawn, with circular steps, benches, a big Christmas tree, and a beautiful statue of Elvis, onstage in the very spot he had performed in 1956. The statue was erected in 2012. The statue is isolated in the middle of the large lawn. Nothing is around it. He is highlighted against the low buildings of Main Street, nothing huddles up alongside of him. There is no other context for the statue. It hovers in thin air. It’s lonely up there in the stratosphere.”

Recap: Supernatural: Season 2, Episode 19: “Folsom Prison Blues”
Supernatural NEEDED to happen in order to set Ackles free. There’s something about the look on his face here (the makeup, plus what he’s DOING with his face), and the posture … that makes us believe. There’s something erotic about that puffy bruise with the cut on top of it. Maybe I’m like Marion Keisker, who responded to Elvis’ pimples and awkwardness, feeling somehow the personality that already existed beneath.”

R.I.P. Alan Rickman
“Alan Rickman didn’t just speak: he chewed words, he rolled them around in his mouth before letting them go, he relished them. He drew out syllables, he held onto consonants (who can hold onto a “t”? Or an “n”? Alan Rickman could and did).”

On The Autobiography of Leroi Jones, by Amiri Baraka
“I love that the editors of this anthology excerpted the part of the memoir that deals with Jones’ memory of attending Negro League baseball games in Newark, where he grew up, and what those games were like, and what they meant to his community. “His” team was the Newark Eagles. The way he described the fan reaction was: “pure love.” In the white world, everyone had to “Yes, sir” “No, sir” and tolerate rubbing-shoulders with racists. Little-boy Jones watched his father blossom at those games, the easy banter with fellow spectators, getting to know some of the players, who were heroes. Everyone dressed to the nines for those games.”

Happy Birthday, Patricia Highsmith
“Love is not sane. Love assaults every sense, leaving the lovers in a state of dizzying captivity. People do not behave like they are sane when they fall in love. Love is a riptide. Love is glorious, love is awful. Highsmith understood all of that, the yearning, the trembling sense of possibility, the terror of rejection. How would one survive life if this particular love crashed and burned? Love is life or death.”

Happy Birthday, Dolly Parton
“Why on earth would you look at a fabulous creature/creation/human like Dolly Parton and decide that concern-trolling her appearance is your best first response?”

“The Long Shadow of Gilda
“The ending, with Johnny and Gilda exiting together, is a holdover from the days of the cathartic “The End” of musicals, but it leaves an uneasy impression, similar to the final scene in Notorious. In neither ending does it feel like “love has triumphed.” It’s more like a criminal getaway. That confusion, so rich, so tormented, so surreal and true, is a huge part of Gilda’s fascination, its enduring draw.”

Happy Birthday, Langston Hughes
“The roots of his poetry were in black American music, not white European literature. That was the huge advancement of Hughes, the thing that changed the landscape: the vernacular not only going mainstream, but coming through the prism altered. The poetry in the everyday, the slang, the local. This is not a small thing. This is how the world changes. You can’t even measure Hughes’ influence in that regard.”

Happy Birthday, Sam Cooke
“He started with a specific image: A boyfriend encouraging his girlfriend to dance the cha-cha, and then she can’t stop. A love song filled with images of education (so important to him, a voracious reader and learner), slide rules and Latin and geography. A glimpse of a chain gang on the side of the road …There’s a place out “New York way” where people twist the night away. People having a party, dancing, the radio on, and “the Cokes are in the ice box, popcorn’s on the table …” Hey, you want to go to the party “over at Mary’s place”? Hell, yeah, Sam, I do.”

Review of Used Cars (1980); d. Robert Zemeckis
“How on earth had I never seen this movie?”

On “Head Down”, by Stephen King
“The world of Little League is of the ultimate importance to everyone who participates in it. It’s great for the kids, the adults are invested, the parents/friends/siblings come to watch the games … it’s a full-spectrum community experience. King captures that.”

February 3, 1959: The Day the Music Died
“The story of why they all got on that plane, during the “Winter Dance Party” tour across the Midwest, is the story of one ominous mishap after another.”

On “Madonna II: Venus of the Radio Waves,” by Camille Paglia
“God, we NEED our contrarians. We need them desperately! Not to agree with 100%, but to push against conformity, to provoke conversation (even outrage), to question/mock sacred cows rather than blindly worship them.”

Happy Birthday, Elizabeth Bishop
“A treasured memory is telling my dad I was getting into her, and how much I loved her, and he asked if I knew her poem “The Moose.” I didn’t. He pulled out a book (he always knew where the right books were), and read it out loud to me. My father had a gravelly voice, unforgettable, warm and grumbly, and he was wonderful when reading out loud. As much as I love “The Moose” (and I DO, it’s now in my Top Bishop poems), what I really love is that when I read it now, I still hear it in my father’s voice.”

Happy Birthday, Edna St. Vincent Millay
“If you only read her poetry (and she’s perfect for when you are lovelorn or nostalgic) you would think she was the most sentimental person on the planet, with one great lost love she yearned for all her days. The fact that she was a ruthless harlot makes her romantic “persona” even more interesting, more deliberate, more a theatrical act of CONJURING than reflection of a personal truth.”

On “Elizabeth Taylor: Hollywood’s Pagan Queen,” by Camille Paglia
“Paglia resists the Meryl-Streep-cult, and tells us why… Elizabeth Taylor connects her to the Dionysian impulse. A woman made to be looked at, to be savored, eaten up, celebrated, an Icon. Paglia sees Meryl Streep’s hard-working-ness to be an example of the Protestant work-ethic that Paglia feels is so damaging and prudish and anti-Art.”

Review: Cemetery of Splendour (2016)
“This is the potential of cinema, to show us experiences that lie beyond words. There is value in conventional narrative, and value in a good story told well. But being prescriptive about what cinema is, or what a good story needs in order to be effective, contracts the possibilities of the medium. Who made up those rules anyway? Weerasethakul embodies possibility.”

“Make voyages! — Attempt them! — there’s nothing else …” Happy Birthday, Tennessee Williams
“An interviewer asked Williams once: “What is your definition of happiness?” He replied, “Insensitivity, I guess.””

Oscars 2016: If We Picked the Winners: Sylvester Stallone in Creed
“Success can calcify talent. Big stars can grow risk-averse. Stallone spoke about how he had allowed that to happen to him. And so he put himself into the hands of a new director and in service of a “Rocky” script he did not write. Of such risks great performances are made. Grounded, funny, touching, subtle, not only is it the best performance of Stallone’s career, it’s one of the best performances of the year.”

Happy Birthday, Marlon Brando: We Can Still Hear That Roar
“Please notice Brando’s stress in the famous line; “I coulda been a contender … I coulda been somebody”. Brando stresses: “I coulda been SOMEbody,” he puts the stress on “some”. I want to talk about Brando’s choice, and it was a choice – although Brando probably couldn’t have put it into words – to stress “some,” in the word “somebody” – which is a counterintuitive line-reading, and one of the reasons the moment is so powerful. It’s a famous line, but I have to point out that it is usually imitated incorrectly; people think they remember the line right, but they do not.”

Conversations with Mitchell, Part 4: Zac Efron
Mitchell: What comes to mind for me when I think about Zac Efron, and why I think you and I love him so much, is Errol Flynn. Errol Flynn was so handsome, so unbelievably gorgeous. He had so much charisma. And so it was hard to take Errol Flynn seriously.”

Conversations with Mitchell, Part 5: Jean Harlow
Mitchell: We always want to compare contemporary stars to the old stars. “So-and-so’s the new so-and-so.” And the reality of it is that there is no such thing as the “new so-and-so”. The people who truly succeed, who leave legacies behind are individuals. They are one of a kind. And certainly at the time, Jean Harlow was one of a kind.”

Conversations with Mitchell: Zac Efron, Part 2
Mitchell: If Zac Efron can figure out how to tap into that thing going on now where it’s now okay for men to admit a sexual attraction to other men and still be straight – in the way that women can do with women, and gay men can do with women … Men have never been allowed to say, “Fuck. If I were gay, I’d stick my dick in Zac Efron.””

Touched with Fire (2016): Not a Review. Not Really.
“The recent Amanda Bynes public breakdown was a great example of how the public discourse around mental health is often so disgusting, even from people who should know better: I watched people make fun of her and I thought: What on earth do these people – many of whom I know who clearly think of themselves as “tolerant” lovely liberal people – think that mental illness or breakdowns look like? Do they think people are SYMPATHETIC during breakdowns? Or understandable? Or “manic pixie dream girls” who cry copious tears and yet still remain adorable? What the hell are you people smoking?”

Oscar Night: For Gena Rowlands
“I was proud to be asked to write the narration for the tribute reel for Gena, played at the Governor Awards ceremony in November 2015.”

On reading Shakespeare’s sonnets in chronological order out loud
“People who don’t understand this kind of project often say stupid shit like, “Relax, Sheila.” “Why don’t you take a load off and read something light?” “How about a beach read?” These people do not understand the pleasures of in-depth rigorous intellectual pursuits – which are so pleasurable they practically have a sexual element, and I wake up excited for the next sonnet and where it will bring me. They do not understand that I have never ever been onboard with the concept of “the beach read.” Fine, if that works for you, but to me the “Beach Read” thing is like a different language. Me no speak it. If I sound irritated, that’s what a lifetime of having people shake their heads at how they wish I would lighten up, or calm down, or read something “easy.” Shakespearean sonnets are easy too.”

Review of Krisha (2016)
“It wasn’t just a turkey. It was life-or-death.”

Recap Supernatural, Season 2, Episode 20: “What Is and What Should Never Be”
“It makes me uncomfortable to see him comfortable.”

All Hail Tom Jones
“If you’re not ready to celebrate Tom Jones, this post will be extremely confrontational.”

Review: Born to Be Blue (2016)
Why an artist is important or revolutionary is what should matter. Budreau cares about what Baker meant.”

R.I.P. Patty Duke
“To say it was a great performance “for a child” is to totally limit the magnitude of what she accomplished as Helen Keller.”

Fade to White: Thelma and Louise Turns 25
Sheila O’Malley: I know, I can’t tell you how many road trips I’ve gone on with a friend and at some point there’s a “Thelma and Louise” joke.
Christy Lemire: It’s got such a great sense of mood—tense, thrilling, melancholy.
Sheila O’Malley: “Good driving,” says Thelma. It gets me every time.”

Interview with Photographer Sheila Welch: “In Cars”
“When you’re in your car, it’s almost like the world outside doesn’t exist. There was an image that started to emerge, this look in people’s eyes when they’re alone, and I want the viewer to interpret it in their own way, but what I was trying to capture was that very human vulnerability. To me, that is what it means to be human, being vulnerable. And being vulnerable means being present.”

Review: Everybody Wants Some!! (2016)
“”Everybody Wants Some!!” is a corrective to the tired, false “dumb jock” stereotype.”

Review: The Dark Horse (2016)
“Chess was a way for them to access the pride of their culture and history, the fact that they all “once were warriors.” It is a militaristic game played by two people, but what happens on the board is a group event, and that was how Potini viewed the game.”

Review: God’s Not Dead 2 (2016)
“They’re so rooted to this specific time and place in American evangelical Christianity that future generations, even Christian generations, might watch them and ask each other, “Wait … can someone look up ‘Duck Dynasty,’ because it seems to have been very important to these people.””

R.I.P. Merle Haggard
“It’s a very masculine voice, masculinity that is open, unafraid, there.”

In Praise of Sonia Manzano (“Maria” on Sesame Street)
“It is an EXPLOSIVE monologue delivered by Sonia Manzano in the middle of a Christmas special for kids. Seriously. Her acting is Oscar-worthy.”

Swann’s Way: The Best Love Letter I Ever Got
“Wade came from Texas and he was wearing a Stetson hat. Just so you get the picture. Plus big chunky silver-turquoise rings like Dean Stockwell in Tracks. He was gorgeous. Or I thought he was. Like a young Jack Nicholson. Or a young Christian Slater. By the time we dis-embarked at 18th Street, we were friends.”

Review: Sing Street (2016)
“Putting together the band has the naive enthusiasm reminiscent of the punk-rock girls in the 2013 Swedish film “We Are the Best!”. The bar for entering rock ‘n’ roll is pretty low; there are no entrance exams.”

Review: Radical Grace (2016)
“The new pope, Pope Francis, chose the name Francis after Saint Francis of Assisi, a 12th-century pope venerated today for his devotion to the marginalized of his time, and – sadly, still – our time: the poor, the sick and diseased—much of his work was done with lepers—and his love of the natural world and animals. Pfleger acknowledged the new feeling of freedom in the Church, because of Francis, but also sensed the political war going on in the Vatican right now, as well as strong pushback from many of the faithful. Pfleger joked, “I pray every day Francis has a food taster.'”

Review: Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016)
“Julian Dennison as Ricky is one of the funniest children on film in recent memory. Ricky may be a victim of circumstances, but in his mind he is Tupac, he is a superhero, he is Rambo.”

Review: Men & Chicken (2016)
“Elias is first seen on a date with a woman in a wheelchair who makes the fatal error of accidentally interrupting him. He snaps, “Do all people in wheelchairs interrupt this much?” Not surprisingly, Elias has no luck with women.”

July and Half of August Premiere: Albuquerque
“The whole thing started because of what I wrote. And people responded to that script from the get-go and so here we are today.”

July and Half of August: Some Screengrabs
“Here are some glimpses of what the film looks like.”

AFME: Talking with Wes Studi
“Studi said that any Native American becoming an actor knows that he will be asked to do what he called “Leathers and feathers” parts. It’s part of the gig. It’s a “way in.” He shared a story, though, about one of his first roles in a TV movie. He had to creep along a roof, ready to shoot someone below, and the director said, “Okay, so when you come along that roof, I want you to be low and sneaky like an Indian.” Wow. Studi said, “So what did I do? I snuck along that roof like a low and sneaky Indian.””

Spontaneous Tribute in Albuquerque
“Then he said, looking up into the wings at God, “And please remember Prince … and anyone else who has passed on.” Mum reached out her hand to me and whispered, “Bill O’Malley.” Echoing my own prayer. We both were in tears. And then – from all over the theatre – people started calling out names. Nobody had microphones. This was a spontaneous event. The voices came from everywhere. Nobody spoke over each other. There were no repeats. Name after name after name. Called out by individuals from every corner of the theatre. “David Bowie.” “Merle Haggard.” “Natalie Cole.” “Glenn Frey.” “Maurice White.” It went on and on and on and on…. Until finally it stopped. On its own.”

Review: Sin Alas (2016)
“The paranoia of Castro’s Cuba is intense in the 1960s sequences, and the style reflects that reality. In the current day, life on the street may be more relaxed, but that paranoia remains: open doorways, labyrinthine stairwells, windows peering down on the residents from above.”

Review: The Lobster (2016)
“If every interaction contains the possibility of monogamy as well as societal-redemption, not to mention avoiding being turned into an animal, then personal connection becomes not only impossible but irrelevant.”

R.I.P. Katherine Dunn
“I’ve been staring at the computer screen trying to think of what to say.”

John Wayne’s Balletic/Symphonic Gesture in Angel and the Badman
“The gesture is magnificent, and all of a piece.”

My Favorite Elvis Album/Book/Movie: for critic Padraic Coffey
“It was the first of what would be a theme in Elvis’ life, that came up again and again, where he didn’t so much reinvent himself, but reminded everyone of his relevance, his power. He was an extremely competitive man. Even when The Beatles came in the mid-sixties, he was anxious to dominate. He could be very lazy, but when he put his mind to it, he moved mountains.”

Review: The Fits (2016)
“Toni is comfortable in the boys’ world, and Royalty Hightower is totally believable as a young and competent athlete. She moves through the girls’ world like a ghost, or maybe it’s the Lionesses who are the ghosts. Whether she’s ready or not, Toni is about to be a part of it.”

Always the Greatest: Remembering Muhammad Ali
“Outside of being a boxer, outside of being a man of convictions, political courage, compassion, strength, he was also an entertainer and he took that seriously. He knew what people wanted from him, and he provided it with panache. That is old-school generosity and, unfortunately, a lost art.”

July & Half of August: Screening at Videology
“It’s gratifying to hear an entire group of people erupt into surprised laughter. When Jack gestures to the bartender for another round after an awkward moment, people roared. When she started babbling about Tess of the D’Urbervilles people lost it. These were moments I hadn’t thought of as particularly funny.”

R.I.P. Chips Moman
“Chips Moman ushered (pushed, really) Elvis into a modern sound. An adult male sound. A guy with responsibilities, a daughter, a marriage, a social conscience, an awareness of the world, and relatable human problems – of which “Suspicious Minds” is probably the best example.”

Recap: Supernatural: Season 2, Episode 21: “All Hell Breaks Loose, Part 1″
“Director Robert Singer knows his High Noon inside and out.”

Review: Wiener-Dog (2016)
“At one point, Zoe says to her grandmother with desperate brightness, “I’m still young!” and Burstyn snaps, “Don’t kid yourself.” That could be a summing-up of Solondz’s outlook on life. It’s not that there isn’t humor in life. Or joy. There is. But don’t kid yourself.”

R.I.P. Michael Herr
Dispatches was required reading in my family, talked about often by my Vietnam-vet uncles. Dispatches has more in common with gonzo journalism than, say, William Shirer’s amazing dispatches from Berlin in 1932-33. Michael Herr, once he was in the thick of it in Vietnam, understood that politicians would always be politicians, but that the real story was what it was LIKE over there. Let other journalists “interpret” the press releases and press conferences and write nice adult dispatches for the complacent folks back home to read. Herr was the voice of the men (and boys) on the ground.”

On The Girls, by Emma Cline
“Evie is mostly a “guest” at the ranch, and so its maneuverings often happen behind the scenes. I am not sure that this works entirely. Because to me the really interesting question is, and it’s the eternal question: If Evie had seen more of the backstage story, more of Russell’s violent nature, the mania, the planning for a violent confrontation … would she have still stayed?”

R.I.P. Scotty Moore
“Listen to Elvis’ first track, the track that shook the world, that started it all, and listen to what Scotty’s doing in the background. Elvis really couldn’t play the guitar. Scotty’s presence was essential.”

Review: Life, Animated (2016)
“When Owen Suskind was three years old, his motor and language skills deteriorated, seemingly overnight. He retreated from the world.”

On This Day: July 5, 1954 – Elvis Presley Recorded “That’s All Right”
“Sam Phillips was very interesting on his own yearning at that time, saying that he didn’t even know what sound he was looking for, he didn’t know how to describe it because it didn’t exist yet – but the search for it was what drove him on so tirelessly. However, in 1953, Sam Phillips didn’t hear it in Presley. A year later, he did. And then, almost by accident. It was Presley goofing off on this fateful day that made Sam Phillips shout, A HA.”

R.I.P. Abbas Kiarostami
“There are only a few directors who inspire such reverence, such passionate interest over DECADES.”

Review: Captain Fantastic (2016)
“Just because Ben is a lefty doesn’t mean he’s not a jerk.”

Cat on a Hot Tin Roof in the Berkshires
“Big Daddy has one objective: get through to my lost son. Watching Jim Beaver try all these different tactics in trying to achieve his objective was gorgeous, tense, thrilling.”

Review: Phantom Boy (2016)
“The characters cast shadows so stark that they are almost entirely separated from their bodies, like second selves, detached and watchful, as though everyone on the planet also has a phantom self, like Leo does, straining to roam free.”

Review: Don’t Think Twice (2016)
“One of the cardinal sins of improv is saying “No.” Example: One person points a finger at another person and shouts “Bang bang!” The person who was clearly just shot at says, “That’s not a gun, that’s your finger.” The line might get a laugh but it ends the scene. “Yes, and … ” makes sure that a scene continues, creating the environment of acceptance that makes all good improv possible. “Yes, and … ” is how Birbiglia and his ensemble approach every scene in the film.”

My favorite “Uplifting Movie”: Blue Crush
“I don’t believe in guilty pleasures. “Guilty pleasure” assumes that some pleasures are more “valid” than others, that you should be embarrassed to admit you find pleasure in certain things. I don’t subscribe to that view. As long as your pleasure doesn’t hurt another human being or animals, then guilt shouldn’t come into the picture at all. Life is tough enough as it is. Pleasure is hard to come by. Revel in it if you find it, who cares where. I bought a ticket to see “Blue Crush” to escape the heat wave. I stayed to see the next show because I wasn’t done mainlining its joy, its colors, its music, its characters and atmosphere. I’m still not done.”

Review: Little Men (2016)
“”Little Men” has a melodramatic set-up out of 1930s agitprop theatre (landlords vs. tenants). Melodrama for some reason has a bad reputation, seeming to suggest soap operas or three-hanky weepers, but melodrama has always been one of the most effective genres for social and economic criticism because down on the ground things really are that important. There is nothing melodramatic about losing one’s home and livelihood. It’s life and death to the people involved.”

Review: Bullhead (2011)
“In his vulnerability, in his desire to look like he should be there, to look like he is part of the human race – from which he feels forever banished – he pretends to dance. It’s one of the most tragic things I’ve ever seen.”

Riotous Excursions: Baz Luhrmann’s The Great Gatsby
“Who else but Baz Luhrmann could take these images and make them as huge and as sinister and evocative as they are in the novel? Who else could make these images as important to the film as “what happens” in the plot?”

World-Class Acting: On Joan Crawford and Sudden Fear
“Her work in this scene should be studied by young actors as an example of the pinnacle of what film acting can be, as well as the importance of listening, listening being the most important “skill” any actor needs to have.”

Review: Disorder (2016)
“Vincent’s brain, already flooded with excess adrenaline, cannot absorb what comes at him; he isn’t sure if what he perceives is real or a phantom manifestation of war trauma. His confusion bleeds out into the audience. We question his reliability as a narrator.”

Review: Spa Night (2016)
“Ahn and his cinematographer Ki Jin Kim film all of this in widescreen, creating a sensual mood, scenes drowned in steam or blue light. Confidence like Ahn’s comes from confidence in the story he wants to tell. “Coming out” may be a rite of passage but each story is different, each person has different pressures.”

On Rust and Bone (2012)
“Ali is not a therapist or a life coach. But his independence from her (as well as the fact that 1. he showed up today at all and 2. legitimately didn’t seem to understand why she didn’t want to go swimming) makes her stronger, somehow. Makes things clearer for her. He’s not a manic pixie dream boy and she’s not a manic pixie dream girl. They’re both too selfish and isolated and damaged to spend any energy at all being “inspiring” for one another. That’s not how this story operates.”

Review: Kicks (2016)
“Sneakers send a message: “I am somebody.” Sneakers also make you vulnerable to those who want what you have.”

How It Went Down, Or: As I Remember It: Two Separate Things Became One Thing.
“Once the train of hypomania leaves the station, it takes an act of enormous willpower – buffered by support – to slow all that shit down. I was incapable of it.”

R.I.P. Curtis Hanson
“Curtis Hanson approached material like a storyteller, in the way the old-school directors used to do before everybody got self-important about their own personal vision.”

R.I.P. Bill Nunn
“Radio Raheem haunts the landscape. Radio Raheem is the symbol of “the problem”, as it has always been in this country – and it’s the rare kind of character where you all you have to do is say his name and people nod in understanding of what it means.”

Giant (1956): 60th Anniversary Screening at Film Forum
Carroll Baker: Nobody who writes about films is going to like this answer. They never told an actor how to act. They cast you because they thought that you were right for the part, that you could do it. Only the bad directors tell you how to read a line, how to define your character. The good ones let you do your job.”

TCM Diary: Miriam Hopkins!
“She was an extroverted performer, expressive in her gestures and emotions, an actress who could easily command the center of the screen (or the periphery, if necessary). Her comedic timing was as sensitive as a tuning fork, and her ability to shed oceans of tears was equally impressive. In tantrum mode, she was explosive. Hopkins projected to the cheap seats. It’s a kind of acting that is out of style now: born from vaudeville and other stages, the broad presentational 19th-century pantomime style. It’s an approach that takes enormous skill and moxie, both of which Hopkins had in spades, and she added superior cinematic know-how (witness her exquisite work in close-up).”

What If? A Chronicle of What Might Have Been, illustrated by Annie West
I contributed an entry titled “What If Elvis Had Lived?”

September/October Film Comment: “Sweet Agony: Dean Stockwell in Compulsion

Review: Under the Shadow (2016)
” Rashidi’s visceral performance is meticulously structured in its emotional progression, although the end result does not feel “structured” at all. What we see is a woman losing her mind.”

Supernatural: Season 2, Episode 22: “All Hell Breaks Loose, Part 2″
“Kim Manners’ style buries us, traps us, smothers us. How to film tragedy and operatic emotion? Make it as beautiful as you possibly can.”

Review: Little Sister (2016)
“In its radical yet thoughtful way, “Little Sister” insists that bridges—in us and in the culture—can be gapped, abysses can be crossed, divisions are not permanent.”

Review: Christine (2016)
“Rebecca Hall’s performance, however, is one of the most insightful portraits in recent memory of how untreated depression can operate. Depression is not pleasant, and people who suffer from it are not always sympathetic. Chubbuck is a maddening person to those who love her. Even her supporters are eventually pushed away.”

“Am I Too Loud For You?” Happy Birthday, Eminem
“The song is a fantasy. Last time I checked Kim Mathers is still walking among the living. Fantasies aren’t just unicorns and rainbows. Fantasies are often ugly and pathetic, which is why we hesitate to share them.”

For the Oscars’ Governors Awards: Anne V. Coates Lifetime Achievement Reel
“I am thrilled to have been asked to pay tribute to this genius. So far there has been no word on who will read the script I’ve written, but the actress they have approached is an exciting prospect for me. Hopefully I will have given her something beautiful to read.”

The State of Cinema in 2016, According to Yours Truly
“Movie-making is a business. Of course. But it is also an art. Rating the health of cinema purely on box-office receipts is a depressing internalization of the capitalist value-system.”

Review of Elle (2016)
“Every interaction, not just sexual and political, contains small jostles for power, position, dominance. Who’s the “top”? Who’s the “bottom” in any given moment? There are competing objectives in every conversation, each side maneuvering to get what they want. Jostling for power comes in many different forms, playing out in romantic relationship, office dynamics, even in a conversation with a group of friends where you have something to say and everyone is too busy talking to give you “the floor.” “Elle” is a dissertation on power dynamics.”

New Voices: Ebert Young Writers Program For the Arts Covers HIFF 2016
“Watching a film knowing you are going to write about is a different mindset. What are the questions to ask? It’s not enough to say, “I didn’t like it” or “I did like it.” These students were so good at asking questions: Why did this work? How did the director help tell the story? If it didn’t work, what was the problem?”

Review: Always Shine (2016)
““Always Shine” is a persona-swap movie, clearly influenced by “Persona” and “Mulholland Drive,” two other films featuring actresses who experience a dangerous and disorienting merging, boundaries obliterated, the quest for identity totally irrelevant in the world of theatre, where you—the person—are supposed to disappear anyway.”

Review: Miss Sloane (2016)
“Perera’s awkward script makes it abundantly clear just how difficult it is to pull off Aaron Sorkin-esque dialogue, the rat-a-tat-tat of “The West Wing” or “The Social Network,” featuring people wholly fluent in complex “insider” language. It’s challenging to write and it’s challenging for actors to deliver.”

Supernatural: Season 3, Episode 1: “The Magnificent Seven”
“What Padalecki is REALLY playing through the boring dialogue having to do with crop failures and demon silence is the scene beneath the scene. This is true throughout: it is always present and Padalecki never forgets it. To me, this is Padalecki’s episode entirely.”

Review: Things to Come (2016)
“What happens is not as important as Hansen-Løve’s attitude towards what happens. In this, and in her other films, “Tout est pardonne,” “Father of My Children,” “Goodbye First Love” and “Eden,” she is interested in a character—or, in the case of “Eden,” a specific “scene”—and how it evolves over time. There is a George Eliot style of distance in her approach, although she is not unattached or indifferent. Her distance helps her to create extremely detailed scenarios, rich with complexity and accuracy, as though her perch on a cloud gives her more perspective. She is not intimidated by Aristotle’s unities. She peppers the action with title cards: “Several Years Earlier.” “One Year Later.” etc. Characters don’t age visibly. She has been criticized for that with her other films, but that criticism seems to be focusing on the wrong things. She’s one of our current great humanists.”

Happy Birthday Little Richard: Preacher. Showman. Maestro.
“He is searching for a catharsis, too. The apotheosis of his expression.”

Chicago Recap
“At some point, when I took a breath (I ranted for about, no word of a lie, 15 minutes), Mitchell said quietly, “All I said was ‘I like Demi Lovato.’””

Rogerebert.com Contributors: The 10 Best Films of 2016
“An enormously tender film, “Paterson” embraces community (the local bar, the craft fair attended by Paterson’s girlfriend, the passengers on Paterson’s bus), but it also embraces the private dreamspaces of its characters, some that are shared, others left hidden. What a thing it is to watch a film where everyone does their level best to be kind to one another. That’s what living in the world is all about.”

TCM Diary: The Night Digger & Alice, Sweet Alice
“From one scene to the next, religious iconography overwhelms the screen: paintings of Mary and Christ, marble statues, crosses on every wall, religion leering at the characters from behind. Parishioners kneel at the altar, pushing out fat tongues for communion (Communion was the film’s original title), looking like a parade of aggressive Rolling Stones logos. Religion is not a refuge in Alice, Sweet Alice. It is a rejection of the body itself, but the body—its tongues, its teeth, its menstruation—will not be denied. The murderer in the yellow slicker flitting through the hallways (a callback to the red-hooded child in Don’t Look Now) is an avenging reminder of the primacy of the body.”

“Let’s Have a Party”: The Great Wanda Jackson
““I’m Joan. I’m here with Wanda.” The best two sentences I’ve ever heard.”

The Best Movies of 2016
“The cumulative effect of No Home Movie is devastating, even more so since Ackerman is no longer with us.”

The Great Performances of 2016
“Society tells us to toughen up. We are shamed for being “weak,” for “whining”, for struggling. It’s worse for boys. Girls at least are allowed to have emotions. Boys are told boys don’t cry, grow some balls, “man up.” The message is clear and as damaging as it gets: vulnerability and masculinity cannot be allowed to co-exist. Carefully, sensitively, Rhodes unpacks all of that and shows the peril of Black’s emotional life.”

Review: 20th Century Women
“During scenes in the house, cinematographer Sean Porter sometimes pushes the camera slowly towards the characters sitting around the kitchen table, or pulls it back, the camera moving towards the doorframe. It’s subtle, almost imperceptible, but it provides a clear sense that “20th Century Women” is an act of memory. The camera seems to be Jamie’s perspective in the future, thinking, “Oh, wait … remember that one conversation in the kitchen? Who was there again? What was said again? Oh, that’s right, that’s right … I remember now.””

R.I.P. Carrie Fisher
“There is pain in the book. It’s obvious. Hollywood is a dark and corrupt place. But the humor is paramount. This may be called “denial” in some circles. And her work has often been criticized (wrongly) for not going deep enough, for relying on the wisecrack. This is a result of the self-help-ification of our culture. For Fisher, for so many people, humor is survival.”

Posted in Actors, Books, Movies, On This Day, Personal, RIP | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

2016 Books Read

I’ve enjoyed myself this year with reading. I have finally bounced back from 2009 and 2010, when I was so out of my mind that I could barely read anymore. (Larry McMurtry describes a similar thing happening to him post-heart surgery.) When I finally got diagnosed, I mentioned this to the Mood Disorder specialist who got me under control, and he said that trauma like that – grief + mental illness + wildly spiking mood cycles – can “present” as an actual concussion. The damage can actually be seen on brain scans. The brain has been injured and is protecting itself. There is no room for anything else to get in there. I felt relieved when I heard this because I thought I would never be able to read again. I said, “Is the damage permanent?” In his Italian accent, “Darling, the brain can heal itself.” It took me a couple of years to find my sea-legs again with reading. I read a wide variety of stuff this year: classics, contemporary novels, history, biographies. I was engaged with what I read, and because I was unable to read for a year – I appreciate the act of reading that much more!

2016 Books Read

1. The 5th Wave, by Rick Yancey
I was assigned to review the film for Rogerebert.com. I knew that this YA franchise was hugely popular so I figured I’d just familiarize myself with it before I saw the film, so that at least going into it I’d have some idea of what the story was on the page. (I got into a small disagreement with a critic at a screening once who said she never read or re-read the books for any film adaptation. I don’t think it’s required, but my point to her was: When something goes wrong with a film adaptation, it is usually the ADAPTATION that is the issue. In any case, it can’t HURT to know the source material.) I picked it up, I admit, with a small eyeroll, thinking I would read a couple chapters just to get the lay of the land, and then put it down. 36 hours later, I had read the entire book. Practically in one sitting. I COULD NOT PUT IT DOWN. It tapped into my 13-year-old self, that’s for sure. I would have devoured the book THEN and I devoured the book NOW. And so I was so glad that I read it because the movie – which was not good – failed because it somehow missed the spirit of Yancey’s creation. I LOVED the book. Case in point …

2. The Infinite Sea, by Rick Yancey
I immediately bought the second book in the series and devoured THAT one too. It’s not as strong as The 5th Wave, but still: un-put-down-able.

3. Glittering Images: A Journey Through Art from Egypt to Star Wars, by Camille Paglia
I love her, warts and all. Been a fan from the start, and agree with many of her most controversial opinions. Although not the Trump one, because … really, Camille? Part of being a fan of Camille Paglia is allowing for moments where you’re like, Really, Camille?? But hers is an important voice, increasingly so now. The cultural/social trends she criticized in the 90s have intensified into an even more rigid form – any more rigid and people will be dragged out to meet firing squads. We need her. But I also love her artistic commentary, and this book is a sort of companion piece to Break, Blow, Burn: Camille Paglia Reads Forty-three of the World’s Best Poems, only this time a survey course in Art History, curated by Paglia, the selections reflecting her eclectic taste. Many familiar works of art here but many that were new to me.

4. For Keeps: 30 Years at the Movies, by Pauline Kael
I started a re-read of Pauline Kael this year, starting here. Like Camille Paglia, there are sometimes when I go, “Really, Pauline??” But that response is part of what makes her so great. She demands engagement. Also, the writing itself is aces. I learn so much from reading her.

5. I Lost it at the Movies, by Pauline Kael
Her first collection of reviews. Her excellent essay on Hud is included.

6. Joyland, by Stephen King
My friend Ted gave this to me for my birthday a couple of years ago and I just picked it up this year. This is King as hard-boiled noir detective author, and he’s superb. The atmosphere of that beach town and that run-down amusement park is palpable. King is so so good at nostalgia – although the nostalgia here is not the nostalgia of a golden-hued beautiful past. The nostalgia here is darker, involving a loss of innocence. King is a master.

7. From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies, by Molly Haskell
I assigned it to my students in Hawaii. Anyone who writes about movies, who cares about movies, has to read this book. No excuse.

8. The Guns of August, by Barbara Tuchman
Have been on a mild WWI-themed reading project over the last couple of years. I read this back in college and remember loving it but have not revisited since. There’s a reason why this book has never gone out of print, and why any book about WWI has to reference it. Because Tuchman – not even what was seen as an official historian – or an academic – not to mention a WOMAN – covered it all, and covered it in readable prose filled with the dread and urgency of what happened during that horrible month of August in 1914. It’s all there. Authors who have followed in her footsteps can only build upon what she already expressed.

9. Brooklyn, by Colm Tóibín.
The story of my great-grandmother basically, and many others in my family going far back into the 19th century. To those annoyed at the book because Brooklyn was populated by all colors/creeds, not just Irish (and I’ve encountered one or two of those people, whenever the book comes up): this book is the story of the Irish in Brooklyn. It’s not meant to be the story of everyone. I can’t believe I have to say this, but apparently I do. I’ve said it when it comes up in person, too, which leads to an awkward silence. Oh well. If you think there are other stories to be told about Brooklyn – and of course there ARE other stories to be told about Brooklyn – then write one. Do the hard work and write the story you think should be written. Don’t bitch from the sidelines about an IRISH writer writing about Irish people. Tóibín did the hard work telling the story HE wanted to tell. Tóibín was interested in telling the story of HIS people. (And mine. And so many others.) The book is extremely poignant, and extremely well-observed. His description of homesickness – as an actual sickness – is heart-rending. The movie is wonderful (speaking of good adaptations!! Only a couple of changes have been made, and they all serve the film’s story: the brothers she had in the book have vanished, and that seems to me to be a smart choice, because then the film zooms in on that sister relationship solely. But much of the book has been transferred word for word to the screen.) I love Tóibín. Wrote more about Brooklyn here.

10. The Familiar, Volume 1: One Rainy Day in May, by Mark Danielewski.
Words cannot express how much I have loved reading these books (three so far, a fourth is being released on February 7, 2017. Yes, I have pre-ordered. Yes, I am counting the days). I’ve been obsessed with Danielewski every since I read his House of Leaves many years ago. Only two books have given me legit nightmares, waking up screaming nightmares. One is Stephen King’s The Mist, and the other is House of Leaves. House of Leaves is so deeply unnerving that I actually struggle to compare it to anything else. It is its own thing. I had a hard time getting through his Only Revolutions: A Novel: the format (and he is all about the format) was actually too rigorous and intimidating for me to enter. When you first see his books, they may seem like a gimmick. All those different fonts and illustrations. There are sections of House of Leaves that you have to hold up to a mirror. I don’t find them gimmick-y at all. (And I find a lot of his imitators basically un-readable. There’s no THERE there. But Danielewski has enormous heart. That heart pulses and rages through his books, and you realize that the devices he uses – the fonts and numbering and diagrams and all that – is the most appropriate “form” for his particular sensibility. There’s nobody else like him. Harriet Monroe said of e.e. cummings, “Beware his imitators!” The same can be said for Danielewski’s imitators.) The Familiar is entirely different from House of Leaves, but I have found it compulsively readable. I blabbed about it a bit here. He’s one of my favorite writers working today.

11. Agee on Film: Criticism and Comment on the Movies, by James Agee
Another classic in film criticism. Just over Christmas, Barry and I had a big conversation about James Agee: he had been talking about Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, and he had also come to see me in the award-winning production of A Death in the Family in Chicago, so I brought up his film criticism, and Barry (my dad’s best friend, and a rare book dealer) had never read any of it. I told him about his most famous essay “Comedy’s Greatest Era”. Now I need to send my copy to Barry so he can read it. I’ve been dragging around my second-hand copy of this book since the early 90s.

12. Burning the Days: Recollection, by James Salter.
Salter, who just died, doesn’t have the name-recognition that, say, Philip Roth does, or Mailer, or any of the other 20th century male giants, but he is in the Pantheon, and (in my opinion) his writing often leaves theirs in the dust. Perhaps it was because he wasn’t as prolific as the other Gents. His novels have been few and far between. But WHAT novels. Read A Sport and a Pastime and Light Years back to back and prepare to have your mind BLOWN. Burning the Days is his celebrated memoir and I had never read it before. It’s a masterpiece of the form. I have a hard time articulating what exactly it IS that Salter does with prose that is so remarkable, so unique. It has to do with his devotion to the 5 senses, but it’s more than that. It’s the sheer simplicity of it, how he can put together a couple of different images: sunlight, a cup of coffee, a river … in a way that makes you SEE it, and FEEL it. It becomes your own memory. Salter went to West Point, became a fighter pilot, saw combat in Korea in the 1950s. An outsider, a rebel, a sensitive womanizer, a man who loved sex and drinking and revelry, and a man attuned to loss. “To write of someone thoroughly is to destroy them, use them up … Things are captured and at the same time drained of life, never to shimmer or give back light again.” He tries to capture “things”, landscapes and hotel rooms and mornings and girls, hold them in place, with an urgency and specificity that is entirely his.

13. A Way of Life, Like Any Other, by Darcy O’Brien.
This book was the Discovery of the Year for me, and I have my mother to thank for that. She sent me a copy after raving about it to me. So good. Read it! I wrote about it a little bit here.

14. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, by Pauline Kael.
Kael’s second collection of reviews. This one includes her vicious pan of The Sound of Music, which elicited screams of outrage familiar to any critic who dares to go against the grain, especially with a feel-good movie. I experienced that this year with my Captain Fantastic review. Boy, people loved that movie, and BOY those hippies are pissed off at me. I’m still getting emails. It reminds me of the piece I wrote criticizing Richard Bach. I’ve always said: If you want to get hate mail, seething seething hate mail, for 10 years straight, write a post criticizing Richard Bach. It will unfold like clockwork. Back to Kael: I wish more people understood – and accepted, even LOVED – that 100% agreement is impossible. Or: the only place where 100% agreement is possible is in a top-down totalitarian society, where agreement is enforced. With a billy club. And so there’s people who say stuff like “I don’t like Christopher Hitchens because he wrote that horrible column about how women aren’t funny”. Because, yes, one bad column (and that was a horrendous column) means he should be ignored forevermore. Who are these people? Do they honestly agree 100% with anyone? How sad and limiting! SELF-limiting. I don’t agree 100% with anyone on ANYthing. So now: 100% agreement or we will run you off the Internet with pitchforks, we will report you to your boss for a failed joke on Twitter, we will hound you until you capitulate and apologize. It’s awful. I prefer the chaos of a Public Square where all opinions are shouted at equal volume to the super quiet and polite “we all agree” Utopia that others seem to envision. Scary times. Stay strong and tough. Speak your mind. Don’t be intimidated. Dare to disagree. What are they gonna do, kill you? Assuming 100% agreement, and being outraged when you don’t find it, is evidence of weakness. Not strength. This is why I call it totalitarian. I have strayed far from my topic. One of the reasons I love Kael is not because I agree with her. It’s because her prose is fun to read. And I can count the film critics today whom I can say that about on one hand.

15. Get Shorty: A Novel, by Elmore Leonard.
A perfect book.

16. Ladies and Gentlemen, the Bronx Is Burning: 1977, Baseball, Politics, and the Battle for the Soul of a City, Jonathan Mahler.
A powerful recounting of the terrible summer of 1977, with Reggie Jackson and the blackout, and Son of Sam, and the riots/looting, and you can’t even believe New York was ever this bad.

17. Going Steady, by Pauline Kael
Kael’s third collection of reviews. This collection includes one of her most famous essays, “Trash, Art and the Movies.” That essay alone is essential reading.

18. All the President’s Men, by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein
Strange that I would decide to re-read this this year. Or perhaps not so strange. I first read it in 8th grade, believe it or not. Because I had seen the movie, and was swept away by it. One of my earliest memories is seeing Richard Nixon on TV and thinking he looked mad. It has to be a memory. I saw the movie at age 12. Watergate was in the immediate rear-view mirror of American life at that point. So I read the book. I had no idea that it was too “old” for me and that was the case with all the books I read when I was a kid. I remember being in my civics class (which CLEARLY should be put back into the curriculum STAT. Yeah, let’s NOT teach the CITIZENS of our nation how the government works. Yeah. Let’s just let generations grow up being ignorant and taking our system for granted. Really good plan.) But anyway, I was 12 years old. A child. In my civics class, huddled over a pop quiz. I had All the President’s Men lying on my desk, because I would read it on the school bus. I am not making this up. I was Tracey Flick, perhaps? No, just a curious child, who watched movies that inspired her so much she did the research necessary to learn more. And my civics teacher, strolling up and down the aisles as we took the quiz, stopped when he got to my desk, when he saw the book. I can’t even imagine what he thought. Maybe there are hordes of children out there deciding to pick up All the President’s Men all on their own and reading it in the cafeteria at lunch time, but I fucking doubt it. He picked it up and said, “You’re reading this?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Can I look at it?” I remember feeling a thrill of pride. And while we took the quiz, he sat up at the front of the class reading the book. And every class, for weeks afterwards, he would ask me my progress in the book. (He had read it, of course.) I did not realize that it was out of the ordinary for a child to CHOOSE to read that book. I remember asking my dad, “So … can you explain to me about Howard Hunt? I don’t understand.” Bless his soul, he did.

19. “Have You Seen . . . ?”: A Personal Introduction to 1,000 Films, by David Thomson
Not the kind of book you read cover to cover. I had been making my way through it for about a year, picking it up, putting it down, seeing a film and reading the entry on it, etc. It’s a great way to get introduced to new films too. There’s a bunch here I haven’t seen. Like most people, there are gaps in my cinema knowledge. It’s really fun to fill those gaps.

20. The End: The Defiance and Destruction of Hitler’s Germany, 1944-1945, by Ian Kershaw
A culture/country devoted to pure INSANITY. Absolute delusion leading to unimaginable senseless carnage. Fantasy. Terrifying. Brainwashing. The power of it. How strong a hold it can take. We can see that in operation now. Stop calling it “fake news.” Use its proper name: Political propaganda. Calling it “fake news” is part of the problem: democracies being unable to deal with or comprehend strong-arm tactics. Kershaw is interested in the WHYS of it – WHY Germany behaved in such an insane manner in the final year of the war (well, throughout, clearly, but the pure insanity of the final year is something else altogether). Kershaw is great. I haven’t read much, but I will be reading more.

21. Doctors & Nurses, by Lucy Ellmann.
Ellmann’s Mimi was one of my favorite books that year. It was that rarity: a book that made me laugh so loud I had to put it down, laughter so intense tears were streaming down my face, laughter so prolonged it took up the better part of an afternoon. READ IT. Ellmann is angry, man, angry as HELL, and you can feel it in Mimi, but the filter for her anger – screwball comedies of the 1930s placed into a 21st century environment – was so entertaining that her Treatise – and it is indeed a treatise (the whole book ends with an actual Manifesto) is heard even more clearly. Doctors & Nurses, an earlier book, is brutal in the extreme. Also hilarious. But so grotesque you can’t believe you’re laughing. Ellmann often screams IN ALL CAPS. Doctors & Nurses tells the story of a morbidly obese and rampantly promiscuous nurse who should never ever EVER be allowed near a patient. EVER.

22. Tennessee Williams: Mad Pilgrimage of the Flesh, by John Lahr
The long-awaited second volume of the biography of Tennessee Williams (the first volume written by Lyle Leverich). Leverich died before he could complete Volume II and he tapped John Lahr to carry on his work. Leverich was an “outsider” and the publishing world does not take to “outsiders” and Leverich’s book was so phenomenally successful (one of the best biographies I’ve ever read. Up there with McCullough on John Adams, Ron Chernow on Alexander Hamilton, and Nancy Milford on Zelda Fitzgerald. Oh, and A. Scott Berg on Lindbergh) that the publishing world was forced to acknowledge it. At any rate, finally John Lahr’s book arrived. I’m not a big John Lahr fan and his writing has never impressed me all that much (and Leverich was a superb writer in his own right), but the best thing he did in Mad Pilgrimage of the Flesh was to incorporate enough quotes from contemporaries and from Williams that the text is basically a hook-line for all of the quotes. So there’s not a lot of “Lahr” in there. It’s all quotes. This was hugely pleasing. I take HUGE issue with Lahr’s INSISTENCE on reading biographical one-to-one correlations into every single thing Williams wrote. “This character was based on this, and this play came out of this …” I know Williams was a personal writer. I know that he was working out his own biography through his work, and it was his writing that helped keep him sane (and even that failed him in the 60s). But to continuously point it out shows a pretty serious lack of imagination on Lahr’s part. Or, at least, a lack of faith in the imagination itself. That the works are MORE than Williams’ diary entries, for God’s sake. You see? John Lahr drives me slightly insane. However: I am glad the volume exists now. I still wish Lyle Leverich had lived to complete it himself.

23. Truck, by Katherine Dunn
2016 has been crowded with celebrity deaths, many of which affected me personally. But the death that affected me most strongly was the death of novelist Katherine Dunn. Here’s my tribute. I expressed there what her work has meant to me (in particular Geek Love: A Novel), and it couldn’t be more important. In the wake of her death, I decided to re-read Truck. (I still can’t bring myself to pick up Geek Love again. That book continues to be radio-active to me, my memory of the first reading of it still so strong that I’m not sure I can put myself through it again.) Truck is also mind-blowing. I read it in a 36-hour period, practically in one sitting. (That’s the only way to read it.) Katherine Dunn was one of my favorite people. You didn’t hear from her all that much. That was maybe the best part about it.

24. The Girls, by Emma Cline.
I succumbed to the hype, which is rare for me. I usually wait until hype has died down to check out what everybody else is raving about. I don’t trust hype. Hype turns me off. But for this book – especially with its Manson connection – I caved. There were some very good observations about group dynamics, especially among girls, but I thought that the end copped out on the implications it had unleashed. I wrote about the book here.

25. The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald.
A re-read in preparation for the essay I wrote about Baz Luhrmann’s film adaptation: Riotous Excursions: Baz Luhrmann’s The Great Gatsby.

26. Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, by Tennessee Williams
I re-read the play after seeing a wonderful production of it in The Berkshires.

27. Hog Pilots, Blue Water Grunts: The American Military in the Air, at Sea, and on the Ground, by Robert Kaplan
I’ve been reading Robert Kaplan for years, ever since I read Balkan Ghosts: A Journey Through History. He’s prolific, and can be a Doomsday Soothsayer, but there’s a toughness to his work, an on-the-ground perspective that is sometimes completely lost in the abstractions that populate news feeds now. Like Christopher Hitchens, like his idol Rebecca West, like Orwell, he cannot be easily pinned down to one “side.” The “right” seems to have more appreciation for him – or even awareness of him – because of his interest in the American military and how it operates, but even there, he is extremely critical of much of it, especially the war in Iraq. Hog Pilots is the second part of what he started in Imperial Grunts: On the Ground with the American Military, from Mongolia to the Philippines to Iraq and Beyond, a pair of books that examine every branch of America’s military, the different cultures, how those cultures are changing (or not) when faced with new threats and a new global situation, as the power starts to shift East. Often it’s career military who see shit coming down the pike that civilians back home – and the government back home – don’t want to hear. I asked my friend, who is career military – in a Special-Ops-kind-of-unofficial way (like, there’s shit he won’t tell me, even though I’ve begged, and wheedled, and pleaded), what he thought of Kaplan’s work and he was hesitantly positive. “He’s good. He’s a little too credulous and rah-rah about the American military,” was my friend’s comment, a comment I take very seriously since he’s spent the majority of his life in the military. His father was a POW in Vietnam who never returned. So his opinion about Kaplan carries a lot of weight for me. I come from a family where almost all of my uncles served (and those who didn’t – like my dad – were barred because of physical issues, like eyesight), where a bunch of my cousins served and are serving, and so it’s not this weird unheard-of thing. Anyway, these two books from Kaplan – keeping my friend’s comment in mind (and he’s someone I trust) – are super interesting, and revelatory (I would imagine) to those who don’t know how things work. Any time we can try to figure out “how things work”, we should jump on it. Our lives depend on it. Kaplan traveled the world, embedding himself on submarines, in small Special Ops outfits, in training exercises, on gigantic ships, seeing how the different branches worked, who the people were, how the cultures differed, etc. They’re really interesting books.

28. The Familiar, Volume 2: Into the Forest, by Mark Danielewski
Devoured it. They are challenging to read. Some of the narrators are almost incomprehensible, they speak in dialects, one is a drug addict and his voice reflects that. But Danielewski is working towards something. Something to do with synchronicity, maybe. Not sure yet. The multiple narrators hail from around the world. Singapore, Mexico, a cluster in California. None of them are connected, although cats – somehow – are a running theme. And each person “hears” things, a tone, a cry of pain, that emanates from some unknown place, of mysterious origin (and it’s symbolized by three horizontal pink dots … this is Danielewski: things must look right. I can only imagine the meetings he has with his publishers, and the jobs of editors and artists putting together these books, with their color-coding – each page has a color coded border, and font differences, and margin differences: everything means something). All of this could be seen as Christopher-Nolan-ish (in my world, not a compliment), but to me it’s not. It has in it Danielewski’s urgent questioning, his care about people (always present), his vast power of mimicry (which was on display in House of Leaves, which took the form of an academic paper, interspersed with “footnotes” written by a tormented tattoo artist who had “found” the manuscript). There’s really nobody else like Danielewski. Reading The Familiar – all three volumes (so far) – was one of the funnest experiences of this horrible horrible year.

29. The Familiar, Volume 3: Honeysuckle & Pain, by Mark Danielewski.
See above.

30. The Immortal Irishman: The Irish Revolutionary Who Became an American Hero, by Timothy Egan
Cousin Kerry sent me this biography of Thomas Francis Meagher, an incredible Irish (and then American) patriot, with a story that you can’t even believe is real. As Cary Grant shouts in Bringing Up Baby, how can so much happen to one person?? Meagher had a Hamilton-style of attack: it was through his pen, and his pen was feared, and it was his pen that got him into trouble. But his journey spans the globe. Starts in Ireland, sent off on prison ship to Tasmania, some time there before his daring escape – involving a pirate ship and a secret rendezvous (again, you can’t believe it really happened that way, but it did!) – and then making his way to America, where he was already famous to all of the Irishmen/women who had washed up on the shores of America post-famine. He arrived just in time for the Civil War, in which he fought (he created the legendary – and feared – Irish Brigade.) I highly recommend this book, not just to Irish-Americans (although it’s a wonderful book showing the trajectory of the Irish in America post-Black-47). A wonderful immigrant story: and we need all of those we can get right now.

31. The Selected Letters of Elia Kazan
I have been waiting for this book for the majority of my life. It’s finally here. Reading this collection was THE reading experience of 2016 for me. I know Kazan’s life like the back of my own hand. And his letters are quoted often in so many biographies that I’m familiar with the texts already. But so far there had never been a collection of his correspondence (for shame). He was an amazing writer (anyone who’s read his stupendous autobiography knows that), and a voluminous correspondent. You can’t believe how many balls he kept in the air at one time. I love him. His work matters so much to me. It helped FORM me. I was un-formed, and then I saw East of Eden at 12, and began to actually FORM into the person I am now. Because of him. So when I finally met Elia Kazan … one snowy night on 44th Street … in the actual Actors Studio, which he had helped create – it was all I could do to keep myself together. This is a wonderful and long-anticipated volume.

32. The Burning Tigris: The Armenian Genocide and America’s Response, by Peter Balakian.
I had read, and loved, Black Dog of Fate: A Memoir, Peter Balakian’s memoir about growing up Armenian-American, haunted by the ghost of the mostly-unmentioned 1915 genocide of Armenians by the Turks. It was a silent presence in his house growing up and he didn’t know what it was, and he didn’t know why he didn’t have any relatives, or why all of his relatives/ancestors appeared to have died in 1915, and he didn’t know what exactly had happened. When he learned about the genocide, he devoted his life to learning more about this forgotten moment in history, the 20th century’s first genocide. (Hitler’s famous comment to his generals: “Who remembers the Armenians?” and etc.) Balakian was a poet and a Beat (he shares some really funny stories about bringing his old-fashioned mother to poetry readings, and bringing Allen Ginsberg home with him). So because I loved the memoir, I bought The Burning Tigris, Balakian’s follow-up, a straight history book sans memoir, immediately upon publication. It sat on my shelves, lo these many years, until I finally picked it up. This is why one has a library. It’s a fascinating look – mainly – at America’s humanitarian response, one of the first times that the American people were galvanized to help an afflicted people. The organization of that response! The Red Cross – which had only operated in America at that point – driven by the stories coming out of Armenia to send its very first group out internationally. I highly recommend the book. Even more important now, when the dehumanizing language of the President-Elect, all throughout his campaign, consigned entire groups of people into non-human status. If they’re “losers,” then who cares what happens to them? They are non-people, not worthy of respect. This must be fought. This cannot be allowed. The book moves into the present day, and Turkey’s continual denial that a genocide even took place: they were acting in self-defense. The “event” has been so buried because it’s not taught in schools, and generations have grown up not even knowing about it. My father, in his role as librarian at a university, was in charge of the work-study students, giving them assignments and working with them. (Many of them, decades later, traveled long distances to attend my father’s wake. It was so touching.) One exchange student from Turkey, whom Dad really liked, she was a “go-getter” (his highest praise), came into his office one day in tears. She had just learned about the genocide. She had never heard of it before. She was devastated that her country had done this, and she wanted to know if it was true. She trusted Dad to tell her the truth. He said, “Yes, it is true.” They sat and talked a long time about collective guilt, and whether or not she should feel guilty (he told her she shouldn’t.)

33. Mary Ann, by Alex Karmel
The searing and brief novel, opening with a violent rape, that was then adapted into Something Wild, a 1961 film, mostly forgotten, that will be released by Criterion on January 17, 2017. I wrote the booklet essay, so I needed to re-read the source material.

34. My Brilliant Friend: Neapolitan Novels, Book One, by Elena Ferrante
I read her The Days of Abandonment in 2015, and it blew the top of my head off. I started it at the beach one morning, got so into it, that I stayed at the beach hours longer than I had planned so that I could finish it. Ferrante (a pseudonym) has been much in the news this year (her cover blown by a jackass journalist, who seemed unable to cope with the Unknown, and seemed to have a sense of glee that perhaps Ferrante – a brilliant psychologist of what it’s like for women – was a man. I ignored the entire thing. Nope. Not participating. Nope nope nope. As always with me: the work is paramount. I refuse to get distracted.) So then this year I began her Neapolitan quartet. Words cannot describe how good this woman is. Believe the hype.

35. Dead Elvis: A Chronicle of a Cultural Obsession, by Greil Marcus
A re-read. Essential reading for any serious Elvis fan. But I imagine it would be fascinating for anyone interested in celebrity, iconography, and obsession.

36. Long Shadows: Memoirs of Shane Leslie, by Shane Leslie
I bought this book in January of 2009. The month my father died. I will always regret that I did not read it while he was alive. My father was an expert in Shane Leslie (and gave many talks and lectures on the man throughout his life), along with being an expert in Francis Stuart (he published a bibliography of the works of Francis Stuart) and James Joyce. And many other things. Shane Leslie was a fascinating individual – cousin to Winston Churchill – who intersected with – seriously – every single important person in the early-and-mid years of the 20th century. A memoir filled with gossip, great anecdotes, and what my dad called the “puff-puff” (meaning “hot air”) of his personality. A beautiful reading experience, pierced with personal regret.

37. Hellfire: The Jerry Lee Lewis Story, by Nick Tosches.
It’s hard not to write “the great Nick Tosches,” “the legendary Nick Tosches”, and etc. His Dino: Living High in the Dirty Business of Dreams (biography of Dean Martin) is not just a high watermark of the form, but practically its own genre. Sui generis. It cannot be imitated because Tosches is unique. The same is true of his fast and furious biography of Jerry Lee Lewis, which has to be read to be believed. Greil Marcus, who wrote the intro, said that the ending of the book was harrowing, especially for a biography about a man still living. I love Jerry Lee Lewis, but went through a pretty serious Phase this year. I’d read the book years ago, but had to pick it up again.

38. Picture Perfect: The Jodi Arias Story: A Beautiful Photographer, Her Mormon Lover, and a Brutal Murder, by Shanna Hogan.
I’ve said it before although maybe not here: If I had nothing else to do with my life, no writing projects or obligations, I could conceivably spend the majority of my time watching and re-watching the trials/interrogations of Jodi Arias and Casey Anthony. So I saw this book and figured, “What the hell.” Jodi Arias is a pure sociopath, but I think Casey Anthony is on a whole “nother” level. Regardless. A good read.

39. In the Woods, by Tana French
A re-read. I actually haven’t read the two latest in the series, and I want to, so I figured I would re-read the ones I read so far. I’ve written quite a bit about her work, saying nothing that hasn’t been said better by other people, but one of the things that distinguishes this series – outside of the crime aspect, outside of the Irish aspect, outside of the Celtic Tiger aspect (all of which are extremely observant) – is French’s writing itself, which is startlingly good. And consistently good. She seems to just crank these out, but each one is different, each one with a distinctive voice. I’ve been having fun re-reading them. In the Woods is haunting. I’ve also said before somewhere that as much as I love John Banville (I prefer his Benjamin Black persona), I think Tana French kicks his ass in terms of her portrayal of the economic upheaval – the insane Celtic Tiger boom and then the devastating crash – in Ireland. In many ways, that’s what her series is all about, not murder investigations.

40. The Story of a New Name: Neapolitan Novels, Book Two, by Elena Ferrante
Much longer than Part One, but these books are compulsively read-able. The narrator is driving me CRAZY. Lila breaks my heart. I was so immersed in this book and in their relationship that I needed to take a break before picking up the third volume. I’ll continue on with them in 2017, because I’m too invested now to stop. Ferrante’s devotion to the intricacies of human relationships is astonishing: the things she sees, perceives. There’s also her observations about life on the ground in one neighborhood in Naples, post-WWII. It’s extremely local. The friendship, though … that’s the hook. Wow.

41. Madame Bovary, by Gustave Flaubert
A re-read just for the hell of it. I had forgotten how hilarious much of it was, in a vicious lampooning sort of way. His descriptions of people! So incredibly mean! He side-swipes them with a sentence only, and there they are, right in front of you. Flaubert is vicious about the middle class. Vicious. The book is devastating. I find it hard to believe that I was once fluent enough in French that I read it in French. I could never do that now, it’s been too long and it’s all forgotten. I’m sorry about it.

42. The Likeness, by Tana French.
So far my favorite one in the series. I love how French is unafraid of melodrama, the frankly unbelievable “device” of Cassie having an identical out there, a Doppelgänger who stole her identity. Her FAKE identity. The mirroring effects are dizzying. The book is truly unnerving. That house and its occupants are unnerving. I put this one on my Recommended Fiction list.

43. East of Eden, by John Steinbeck
I’m not sure, but I think it’s my 4th time reading this book. My first was when I was in 8th or 9th grade. I had seen the movie, which was a life-altering experience. I hadn’t realized that the movie only included the third section of the book, the final generation. But I still got into the sweep of the story, and loved the parts that many people (I learned later) really didn’t care for, or wanted to skip over, the Hamilton family sections, which have “nothing” (sort of) to do with the Cain/Abel story as played out through the Trask family. But I LOVED the Hamiltons. Those characters lived for me, especially Dessie. I didn’t understand then what it meant that that fun-loving woman who had created such a sanctuary for women in her dressmaker’s shop somehow lost the gift of laughter after a failed love affair. That something was lost forever to Dessie when she lost that. I didn’t understand it but it made a huge impression. Well, I would learn later in life what that meant. I lived it. And I would think of Dessie, and think, “Somehow she made an impression on me, even though she only appears in the book for 10 pages, maybe, total, because I knew somewhere that her destiny would be mine.” Shivering thoughts to this day. You just wish it had gone another way. But it didn’t. Did I know, at 13, or sense … the dangers? That I would lose my own joy/hope/quickness-of-laughter at some point along the way? I don’t know. I’m inclined to think yes. Cathy also made a great impression. I have written about her almost as much as I have written about anyone. People still resist Cathy. They shouldn’t. I re-read the book because I’m working on a giant project. The research has been really fun.

44. Journal of a Novel: The East of Eden Letters, by John Steinbeck
Research continued. Now this I had not read. The writing of East of Eden took a year, and during that time, Steinbeck wrote almost a letter a day to his editor, mainly as a journal, although the letters were passed on (the editor’s wife saved them, which is why we have them today). A fascinating record of an artist at work. And inspirational in that Steinbeck reports procrastination, and insecurity, and despair at what he has set out to do … things any writer would recognize. If a giant like Steinbeck went through all of that, then maybe this is just the writer’s lot, and not a personal failing. It’s part of the gig.

45. Tomorrow, short story by William Faulkner, included in the 1949 collection Knight’s Gambit
Research for another project I’m working on. I am sure I have read this before (I’ve had Knight’s Gambit in my library for decades), but I had very little memory of it, outside of the 1972 film starring Robert Duvall.

46. Faithful Place, by Tana French
My least favorite of the series thus far. It’s my aunt Regina’s favorite of the series thus far so we have had many interesting discussions about it. I feel that the Irish family stuff is forced and cliched, and the romance with Rosie Daly never quite lifts off the page. The family never seemed quite bad enough for him to exit the scene for good. Maybe that’s unfair. And, of course, there’s a monster in his family, so maybe he was right all along. I also felt the last paragraph was forced, too much of a nod to “The Dead”‘s final paragraph, and you best be really really careful with imitating something that great. Her implicit (and extremely effective) critique of Ireland’s mass-frenzy of consumption during the boom goes explicit in that last paragraph and it just didn’t work for me. Nevertheless: Frank Mackey plays such a large part in the other two books (even as a peripheral character), so it is a lot of fun to see him take center stage. That’s one of the best parts of French’s approach. The series takes place in the same Murder Squad, but it’s all different narrators so people who play cameos in one book (like “Scorcher” Kennedy, an obnoxious presence in Faithful Place, is the narrator in the next book, Broken Harbor: A Novel (Dublin Murder Squad), which I am currently re-reading and won’t finish in time to make it to this list. Broken Harbor is one of the strongest in the series. Maybe the strongest. The images of the housing communities all over Ireland, abandoned and running to rot, is haunting, and French’s strongest observation yet of what happens in a boom and then a crash.

47. Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow, by David Yellin and Marie Connors
Brought out by the wonderful University of Mississippi Press, this book tells the story of William Faulkner’s short story “Tomorrow,” and how it was first made into a teleplay, then a script for the stage, until finally a screenplay. I had never read this. There’s some great stuff in it. The late great Horton Foote is the one who adapted the Faulkner original, drawn to the mysterious character of the pregnant woman, who is only mentioned once or twice, but she was the thing that Horton found himself drawn to. His “way in” to his adaptation. Who was she? What was she running from?

2015 books read
2014 books read
2013 books read
2012 books read
2011 books read
2010 books read
2009 books read
2008 books read
2007 books read
2006 books read
2005 books read

Posted in Books | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

R.I.P. Debbie Reynolds

giphy

My thoughts are with Billie Lourd and Todd Fisher. This is crushing.

She was so talented and she was lucky enough to have “come up” in a Hollywood that knew what to do with her. She could do it all. A triple threat, as they say. There is almost no such thing anymore. As a kid, I was obsessed with Singin’ In the Rain, as I know millions are, and especially theatre nerds. It’s a vision of a life in show biz that makes you want to enter into it. I wanted to enter into it when I was 10, and I still do. While that film will be her main legacy, there were so many others, including her Oscar-nominated performance in The Unsinkable Molly Brown (a movie I also discovered early and loved immediately.) How the West Was Won was always on rotation on the local PBS channel where I grew up, and I loved it, too.

As I have written about before, the battered copy of Carroll Baker’s memoir (discovered in the local library where I had my first after-school job starting in middle school) I can say, without too much exaggeration, changed the course of my life. Or at least opened up the path that I ended up following for the next decades. It started there. Carroll Baker was in How the West Was Won, and she had a blast doing it, and wrote a lovely and funny portrait of Debbie Reynolds.

Debbie Reynolds had had her children at almost exactly the same time as I had. Her daughter Carrie was Blanche’s age, and her son Todd, like Herschel, was five. I was hoping that she would bring Carrie and Todd with her. It wasn’t only the thought of our children playing together that appealed to me, but the possibilities of our nannies keeping each other company…

Rumors were circulating that [Jimmy] Stewart was a regular guy, and that Reynolds was spoiled and a snob. The rumors about Jimmy being a super person were true, but those nasty ones about Reynolds were totally untrue. She was neither difficult nor stuck-up; in fact, nothing could have been further from the truth. It’s odd how unflattering tales get started. Perhaps because Debbie had begun in films as a young girl and had been a star now for so many years, people who didn’t know her automatically expected her to behave like a grande dame.

There were whispers that she would bring a large entourage, that she would always be late, and that she would be unreasonably demanding. I was therefore totally unprepared for the real Debbie Reynolds – a delightfully down-to-earth actress, woman, mother – and friend.

Late evening of the first day, while we were still unpacking, I heard a knock at the door. A perky five-foot-two-inch elfin sprite, dressed in blue jeans and a T-shirt and a bandana covering her hair, was prancing on my doorstep. She had a little boy in her arms and a little girl by the hand. From the moment I answered the door, she took over with bubbling enthusiasm.

“Hi. You’re Carroll. I’m Debbie. This is Carrie and Todd. I told them that your kids are the same age. So we’ve come to get acquainted.”

In my surprise and delight, I must have hesitated in replying because she went on to say, “Look, I know that you’re a serious method thespian and you probably think that I’m a corny musical comedy actress, but we are going to be movie sisters and it will be great for our kids to play together. Anyway, I’m a pushy broad and I’m determined to be your friend. So why don’t you invite me in?”

That was how our friendship began. Our fondness for one another has grown and lasted, and is one of those rare and cherished friendships where we can begin a conversation one year and take it up again after any length of time without missing a beat.

d7946ebe2ec9b8218ffdacc76c71f6f9

TCM’s Star of the Month tribute to Debbie Reynolds was written/narrated by Carrie Fisher. It’s perfect.

Rest in peace.

Posted in Actors, RIP | 3 Comments

11:20 a.m. EST: BBC World Service “World Have Your Say”: Remembering Carrie Fisher

dedklhiqorgxh5cozcpgbd1zlbq

I’ll be appearing on the BBC’s “World Have Your Say” program this morning – 11:20 a.m. EST – to discuss Carrie Fisher.

Posted in Actors, RIP | Tagged | Leave a comment

R.I.P. Carrie Fisher

carriesitting

This blows.

I am honored to pay tribute to her over at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Actors, RIP | Tagged | 10 Comments

Review: 20th Century Women (2016)

large_twozeroth_century_women

I’ve seen it twice now. I think it’s amazing. I liked Beginners (Mills’ first film, about his father coming out of the closet at the age of 75: Christopher Plummer won the Oscar) – but 20th Century Women – about his mother, he kicks it to the next level. Annette Bening gives one of the performances of the year but everyone is superb.

I reviewed 20th Century Women for Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments