2018 Indie Memphis Film Festival, Nov. 1-5

I’m really psyched to be a juror in the upcoming Indie Memphis Film Festival, in the “Hometowner” category (films about Memphis, films/music videos by Memphis filmmakers). The lineup of films in total is extraordinary and if you live in the area, you should definitely come check some of these films out! And find me and say hello. I’ll be there for the duration, going to see as much as I can. Also, on November 4, at 6 p.m., I’m going to be giving a talk on Elvis’ years in Hollywood, introduced with QA moderated by Robert Gordon (I just learned he was going to be introducing my talk today and I am beyond excited to hear about it. His book It Came From Memphis is ESSENTIAL reading.)

Programmer Miriam Bale has done a phenomenal job in picking these films, as well as creating panels and talks, as well as awesome features like the Black Creators Forum, including “pitch rallies”, which sound like they’re going to be incredible. I can’t wait.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | 2 Comments

74 Facts and One Lie

This piece has brought me a lot of luck. More than any other piece I’ve written, this one represents a major shift in who I was as a writer. Without meaning to do so, without even knowing that I WANTED to do so, I went from casual/private to intentional/public writing, through the writing of this piece. I wrote it over 10 years ago during an extremely dark night of the soul. Just like F. Scott Fitzgerald said, at around 3 a.m. one morning, I said to myself, sternly: “Okay, Sheila, just write down the FACTS. ENOUGH with all the emotion. JUST the facts. No subjectivity. Write just what IS.” This was the result. It came out whole. This is the first draft. I have not touched it since I wrote it. Sometimes writing happens that way. Not often, but sometimes.

I knew when I wrote the piece that it was something different. Since then, I have performed it many times, at fund raisers and small theatres. It’s always a lot of fun. The responses are always so interesting. I suppose the less said about it the better. The facts are meant to speak for themselves. The same is true for the lie.

74 Facts and One Lie

He took “Paul” for his confirmation name. Not because of Saint Paul but because of Paul McCartney.

He was 13 years older than me.

He eagerly awaited the latest book by E.L. Doctorow the way others waited for Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.

He had a theory about the linguistic phenomenon of two words separated by ” ‘n”. (As in: rock ‘n roll. Shake ‘n bake. Good ‘n plenty.) If the words are two verbs, then the ” ‘n” means “then”. If the words are two nouns, (or two adjectives), then the ” ‘n” means “and”. He explained, “Yes, because think about it. You have to mix and then match. You can’t do both at the same time.”

He once crashed his bike into the back of a parked car because he was staring at a blue heron.

He referred to himself as a “raging leftie”.

His musical passions were:

Gilbert & Sullivan
Brian Eno
The Elvises (Costello, Presley)
The “girl groups” of the 1960s
The Beatles

He did not know who Jon Erik Hexum was. I illuminated him.

He suffered from what I called “instant drunkenness”. No interim period of slosh. He cut to the drunk.

He wore a Swatch: black straps with white newsprint like a ransom note, green-bordered white watch-face with a black line-drawing of a steaming coffee mug. I secretly coveted that watch.

He thought that there should be a Wizard of Oz amusement park.

He was swept away by Riverdance. He lost his mind.

He had an irrational dislike of guys who wore backwards baseball caps.

He used the word “dyspeptic” once. The only person I’ve known (outside of a book) to do such a thing.

He was an atheist.

The first thing he said to me was, “Are you waiting for someone?”

He loved obsessive British music magazines.

He had what he described as “an excellent childhood”.

He commented mournfully re: Dionne Warwick, “Burt Bacharach lost his muse.”

He said to me, “I see a lot of similarities between us.” “Like what?” I asked. He replied, “Conflict avoidance.” We roared with laughter.

He wore black high top sneakers. This was my influence.

He didn’t really like the American musical as an art form.

He was furious with people who didn’t like the movie Titanic. He saw it four times, staying through the half-hour long credit roll each time.

He was a worrier.
Example 1.
Phone conversation.
He: “So what are you gonna do tonight?”
Me: “Take a walk by the lake.”
Pause.
He: “Do you have your mace??”
Example 2.
On the day I got a wart on my hand burned off, he called me three times. As though I were having open-heart surgery or an emergency C-section.

He did not approve of any of the guys I liked. “They just don’t seem nice.”

He loved the PBS show Ballykissangel even though (as he said) “it’s produced by BBC Northern Ireland and has Brits playing some of the parts.”

He had subscriptions to over fifteen magazines.

The Shipping News reminded him of me. I still don’t know why.

He wasn’t into organized sports.

He loved the word “pussy” but “cunt” made him uneasy.

He was the only person I knew (besides myself) who had read Helter Skelter not once, not twice, but three times. We would toss around the names “Tex Watson”, “Patricia Krenwinkle”, and “Linda Kasabian” as though we knew them personally.

He hated Billy Corgan. Thought he was an egocentric pampered asshole.

He hated Ian Paisley with a passion.

He went to Graceland and had to touch everything. “I touched doorknobs that he touched!”

He hated kids. “It’s fine for other people, and I know some really cool kids. But it’s not for me.”

He thought it was hilarious and “charming” that I would have “salad and a beer” for dinner. He wrote a song about it:

For breakfast I had cheerios
To start my cheery day
For lunch I had an apple
To keep the doctor away
In the afternoon I had a bag of chips and a glass of Pepsi Clear
For dinner I just stuff myself
With salad and a beer
It’s a perfect combination
If I might volunteer
There’s nothing like the gourmet delight
Of salad and a beer.

Walking through the midnight avenues, we came upon Belden Street. He pondered the street sign, and stated matter-of-factly, breaking our silence, “There was once a Trixie Belden.”

He could not stand it when I cried. He would shake me roughly. “Please! Stop crying!”

He had an eye for details, especially when it came to women.
Example 1. I would wear a different shade of lipstick and he would wonder out loud what it all meant.
Example 2. I made an effort to grow my nails. One weekend, I moved to a new apartment. It was physically grueling. I saw him the following day and he immediately glanced at my hands and said, “I see your nails survived the move.”
Example 3. I would randomly (and pointlessly) play hard-to-get with him, acting just slightly unavailable. He would take one look at me, and say straight out: “I see you’re wearing your aloof cloak this evening.”

I ate pita and hummus in his presence once, and years later he was still saying, “Oh, so that was on that day you ate that stuff that time?”

He did not understand how Demi Moore could have married Bruce Willis because “he was a Republican”.

Lesbians scared him a little bit.

He was amazed:

that I went to my prom.
that I loved Huey Lewis.
that I had siblings,
a driver’s license,
plaid flannel sheets.

He and his siblings, as children, would complain to their parents about how they wanted a cooler bike, they wanted this, they wanted that. His father would herd them all into the car and drive them through the poor area of town, not saying a word.

He absolutely flipped out while the Beatles mini-series was going on. He had a week-long manic episode.

He would call me late at night and literally have nothing to say.

He became obsessed with how little I seemed to eat, and interviewed my friends and roommates behind my back. “Does she eat? Have you ever seen her eat?”

He loved the song “Lady Marmalade”. Patti LaBelle’s version, of course.

He gave me money for grad school. He meant for me to spend it on rent or school supplies, so I wouldn’t have to worry about anything my first couple of months in a new city. I instead spent it on a leather biker’s jacket and a boom box. He is still making fun of me for this.

He turned to me once and said, contemplatively, out of the blue, “I wonder what Andrea McArdle is up to right now.”

I told him that his role in my life was as a “dirigible”.

He loved Drew Barrymore, but admitted that this love made him feel “a little bit dirty”.

He hated people who weren’t enthusiastic. Enthusiasm was a philosophy with him.

He called me “Pippi” when I put my red hair in braids. He introduced me to others as “Pippi”. He said to the waitress, “And Pippi here will have a salad and a beer.”

He had long-standing lustful feelings for Jennifer Connelly. Or, as he called her: “the chick in the tank top with the big breasts in that movie poster during the 80s.”

He would yell at me when I got the flu, or even a common cold. He hated it when I got sick. It drove him crazy.

He said to me, “You and I both have that Irish sadness.”

He was a night-owl channel surfer, and a connoisseur of bad TV shows. (Which was why it was completely shocking that he had never heard of Jon Erik Hexum.)

He once was an office temp. He had three blazers.

I ran a 10k and came in 4th to last. He was more moved by that than if I had come in first. “You came in 4th to last!” he breathed in a tone of awe and pride.

Ann-Margret was his ultimate goddess.

He disapproved of my tattoo.

He made me a mix tape. Which I lost. I will never stop wishing that I still had that tape. I only remember two songs from the mix. “1,000 Umbrellas” and “Those Were the Days, My Friend”.

He would fill in the blanks of stories I told him from my own life. Stories that had nothing to do with him. He would also flesh out scenarios that hadn’t even happened yet.
Example 1.
Me: “So this woman was wearing a skintight red dress with a slit up to here-—”
He: “And her breasts were huge, right?”
Example 2.
Me: “I crossed the street. It was snowing really hard–”
He: “And you were really nervous.”
Example 3.
Me: “My school is in the West Village—-”
He: “So you will walk down the sidewalk, wearing a cozy sweater, and you’ll be with a guy who looks vaguely like Bob Dylan.”

He would come up to me and blurt, “I am going to flirt with you shamelessly right now. Is that all right?”

He and I had many moments in alleys accompanied by dramatic weather:
1. Freezing black ice-drenched night. Orange light from the street lamps. Slushy, grey, cold. Scrawny prowling stray cats. We stepped from iceberg to iceberg, suddenly shy with each other in the silence. His soft voice, “Sugar, step this way.”
2. A rainy night. We sat in his parked van. Speckled fogged windshield. We drank beer, played a tape, and sang along. Harmonizing. He said later, “That was the night it started for me.”
3. Downpour. Wooden stairway. Darkness. Our first kiss. Which was actually more like a nature program on the Discovery Channel than a kiss. Biting, scratching, shoving. Each one of us struggling to grab the reins, and dominate. Kissing to kill. His hand clamped round my throat.
4. Heat wave. Muggy hot close air. We rubbed ice cubes over each other’s faces. He lifted me up, placed my feet on top of his feet, and then danced me around the alley, holding me in his arms.
5. Tornado watch. Huddled against the van, huddled against the wind. He was getting married in a week. Not to me. Standing in the massive wind, pressing our cheeks together, not talking. For once, we were not talking. No other body parts touched. My cheeks wet with tears. His cheeks were dry. But when I pulled back, the look in his dry eyes was worse than weeping.

He’s married now.

He has a kid.

He loves the kid. Of course.

He and I are separated by distance and time. But still. He called me on September 12, 2001. To make sure I was all right.

Years after it all ended, years after the tornado-wind alley-scene (#5), I received a small white envelope addressed to me in his handwriting. He had stuffed something inside. I opened it and saw a crumpled-up faded washcloth. No letter, no note. Curious, baffled, I took the washcloth out of the envelope. It unrolled itself and something fell out. The first thing I saw was a line-drawing of a steaming coffee cup. I hadn’t ever asked for the watch. He somehow just knew.

It’s the only tangible thing I have of him.

He said of his wife, simply, “I can’t live without her.”

Something very small, like a twig, snapped inside me when he said that. Snapped for good.

Other than that, I’m fine.

Posted in Personal | 51 Comments

Supernatural, Season 14, episode 2

Haven’t seen it yet.

Have at it!

Posted in Television | Tagged | 10 Comments

Review: Mid90s (2018)

Jonah Hill’s debut as a writer/director is hit-or-miss. Things I liked, things I didn’t. My review of Mid90s is now up at Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Goodbye, Big Bird. And Thank You.

After 50 years, Caroll Spinney – who played Big Bird (and Oscar) – is leaving Sesame Street. His understudy – who has been waiting for literally years – will now take over the role. This is the end of an era and so I wanted to just take a moment to acknowledge its passing.

I reviewed the documentary about Spinney – I Am Big Bird – for Rogerebert.com, and it is truly wonderful. He’s an artist.

Posted in Actors, Television | Leave a comment

Croatia: Plitvice Lakes and Waterfalls

One of our ongoing jokes throughout Croatia had to do with Irish pubs. We tripped over one in Dubrovnik. We laughed about it. Rachel said, “You know there’s an Irish pub in Diocletian’s Palace” somewhere. We kept our eyes peeled for the telltale shamrocks. No go. But then, we came back to our hotel one night and suddenly – at the front door of our hotel – Rachel stopped dead in her tracks and pointed across the street.

Is that the sketchiest place you’ve ever seen in your life? Every time we walked back into the hotel we glanced at it and started laughing. We never saw anyone go in. We never saw anyone come out. And we sure as hell weren’t going to venture over there to investigate.

The way our tour was designed, Ante was going to take us from Dubrovnik to Split. Split is where he lives, so that would be the end of the road for him. Davor would then pick us up and take us on to Zagreb. We would miss Ante. We had gotten very attached to him. We both hugged him when we said goodbye, and I think he was surprised. We discussed him afterwards: “Do you think he liked us?” “I hope he misses us.” “We love Ante.”

We had a long long day ahead of us: Davor was picking us up at 7:30. We had hours of driving ahead of us. In retrospect, I am so glad we got such an early jump on the day. Davor met us in the lobby. We liked him immediately. We’re friends with both Ante and Davor on Instagram and Facebook now. We piled into Davor’s car and off we went. Headed over the mountains again – actually, under at one point, into “continental Croatia” and finally to Zagreb. This would be our longest car ride. As we slipped away from the boundary of Split, the landscape got wilder, as we headed directly towards the wall of mountains.

Once we went through the lengthy tunnel under those mountains, the landscape changed instantly. We drove through a rolling verdant landscape of green fields, sheep, small farms.

Davor told us that this whole area had been really affected by the war in the 90s. We drove by a random cemetery in the middle of a field, guarded by a huge tank. Emptied out of people, Davor said that many never came back. Young people were now moving out of Croatia, in search of better jobs in other countries. Davor chose to stay. A young man in the 90s, who got his degree in political science, he clearly had the foresight to recognize that once the war was over, once the region was safe, tourists would want to come. He worked for a tour company, starting in the late 90s, before striking out on his own with Zagreb Tours. He was right. The tourists did come. We spoke about Bosnia, an inland country, without that coastline, without the possibility of hordes of tourists. A much poorer nation. Croatia’s only export is wine, and their real booming business is tourism. I stared out at those beautiful fields and tried to imagine them war-torn. They were very exposed. It’s just rolling plains, really.

Rachel and I snoozed off and on. But there was a lot to look at outside the windows. After so many days right along the shore, it was interesting to see the inland areas.

Before Zagreb, we were going to spend the morning/mid-afternoon at one of Croatia’s 8 national parks: Plitvice Lakes. Famous for its waterfalls, Plitvice is a series of lakes, at different heights, connected by waterfalls. There are 16 lakes in total, some of them perched high up in the hills, some down at the level of the river. Each of them are connected. It’s all one body of water.

This was such an interesting and fun experience, so different from what we had been doing up until then. We were going to hike along the lakes, and then start the climb, to see the waterfalls, to see the lakes higher up. It was a hell of a hike, people. The day was so chilly people were wearing parkas, and Rachel and I were wrapped up in sweatshirts. But about 20 minutes in, our blood was pumping, because this wasn’t just a small walk along a lakeside. It involved numerous climbs up and up and up. It was rigorous. We were warmed up almost instantly. And, of course, the higher up we went, the more the sun beat down on us. Davor told us that at the height of the tourist season, these wooden-planked pathways among the lakes are a traffic jam of people. It wasn’t like that when we were there, although there were tons of people there.

The paths wind you up and down and around these small lakes and bodies of water, all of which have the most extraordinary colors in them, bright greens, bright deep blues. Davor knows everything about the place and was telling us about how the minerals react with the water and the submerged vines and branches to create those colors. You can’t even believe it’s real, that these colors can be created naturally.

There’s Rachel and Davor. So you can see there are clearly other people there, but we always had space.

They’ve done a wonderful job of not interfering too much with nature. (This is a protected site.) The walkways are made up of planks, and many of the “steps” are just logs dug into the dirt. Eventually, after walking through these beautiful peaceful ponds, you start to hear the rushing of water. And then you get to the show-stopper of the “Big Sprinkler” as it’s called, a large mound of earth – with multiple cascades coming over it. Right around here is where you start to get the vistas around you, steep drop-offs into abysses on either side (once again, Rachel and I found ourselves having to navigate our height-phobias), and the sound of the waterfalls fill the air. There are times when the waterfalls rush underneath the walkways. It’s stunning.

One of the waterfalls had dried up, and Davor said he didn’t want to go past it since it “broke his heart” and this made me love him. He cares about this place. (Rachel also observed to me privately, “That hike didn’t tire him out at all, did you notice?” It really was like he was strolling from the kitchen to the living room. He probably does that hike 3 times a week.) Up and up we climbed. We started to get perspective on where we were. How the ground leveled out, with some blue-jewel-colored lake, or bright green lake, perched on a ledge of land, peaceful and serene, yet leading into yet another waterfall down.

There was also some humor, involving Ante telling us that we were visiting Croatia in what was known in Croatia as “grandmother summer.” We had incorporated “grandmother summer” into our vocabulary in a 2-day period. Ante explained it thus: “Grandmother is almost dead. So is summer.” Rachel and I accepted this without question. Early on in our drive, we somehow mentioned this to Davor and he was like, “What?” He had never heard of it. Which was funny in and of itself. Ante made it sound like it was a common saying. At one point, as we were walking through the lakes and waterfalls, I noticed Davor on his phone. He started to read out loud, “So … grandmother summer …” I immediately burst out laughing. He couldn’t let it stand, he had to KNOW. As we walked along, he read out loud to us. “Grandmother summer” goes by many different names, “Gypsy summer,” “Baba summer,” “Indian summer” – Davor was reading from this page to us – basically what the page was saying was that “Grandmother summer” meant “second youth” – like “Indian summer” – unseasonably warm into October/November. Davor said, “But it’s not like, ‘Granny’s almost dead.'” Hilarity. But maybe that’s how Ante learned it. “Grandmother summer” then took on a whole different aspect. I had told Ante I was going to spread word of the saying through America. Now I have. But now you have Davor’s perspective as well. The game of telephone continues. Oh, and humorously: He was reading it to me as we walked through these walkways, and he said, “Some people say that the saying comes from the mating ritual of the spider -” I exclaimed, “STOP.” At the same moment, he – having read further a little bit – said, “Okay, we don’t need to read that part.” Not because spiders are scary but because maybe he thought that reading out loud about sex – even among spiders – to his American clients – might not have been a good idea. Meanwhile, I just wanted no part of spiders having sex. The whole moment was so funny.

Eventually, we got to a certain height, and took this shuttle bus back down to the parking area. We then had another, like, 2-mile hike even to get to our car. Our legs were wobbly from having gone up, down, up down, for an hour and a half. Davor was going to drive us up to the highest point, so we could get a real perspective on the whole area. This is another great thing about Zagreb Tours. We did the tourist thing (and it was amazing) but then Davor knew a way up to a place not on the tourist track. He drove us up, up, up, and then basically pulled over to the side of the road. Nobody else was up there. We couldn’t see much, we were surrounded by trees. He took us down a path through the woods. You could get the sense of a gigantic DROP off to the right. Through the trees, which clung to an almost vertical wall of dirt. No guardrail, of course. Rachel and I tiptoed along. I couldn’t look to my right. It was too scary. Eventually, we emerged from the trees into a little clearing, that had a small ledge with a stone wall encompassing it.

And here is the view.

I mean …

It’s hard to really get the scale of things into a photo. If you look down around the bottom, you can see the pathway filled with people. The vista was so beautiful we all just fell into silence. And stood there for about 15 minutes, just staring. We also took a selfie with Davor, because come on, of course.

Waterfalls plunged off the cliffs every which way you looked. It made you dizzy just to look at them. On the wooded hillsides across the abyss, you could see the winding pathway we had taken. Like I said, the parks system has done a wonderful job of giving the public access to this beautiful area, without ruining things: the paths are woven into the woods, practically hidden.

Hanging out up there on that little ledge was a necessary breather. We had been hiking, uphill, for an hour. Then we walked around to the vista on the other side, so we could see where we had come from, and also get another perspective. Everywhere you looked was another waterfall.

See that little stone wall across the abyss? That’s where we had been originally.

Once we were up at this level, we were the only ones there.

I’m so glad we decided to fly out of Zagreb, and not backtrack to Dubrovnik (one of our initial plans). But I had wanted to see Zagreb, and so Davor had suggested we do this national park on the way. Zagreb was the real surprise of the trip for me – I’ll get to that in the next post – but seeing this national park, hiking among those blue-green lakes and waterfalls – was really important. It gave just a glimpse of the diversity Croatia has to offer, besides its coastline. I know we barely scratched the surface of things to see. But hiking for hours through that park was beautiful, refreshing, challenging, and the beauty was so extreme I had a hard time even letting it into my brain. (I felt the same way the first time I saw the Grand Canyon. I had to stare at it for like an hour before it even seeped into my head what I was seeing.) The photos I took do not do this place justice, and – like I said – they don’t really capture the heights, the scale of the views.

We hadn’t eaten a thing since our 6 a.m. breakfast. We were STARVING. Staggering back to the car, we were ready for lunch. Davor took us to a place he knew. We devoured it. Talking about our lives, his life. He went to America as a child to visit family, and doesn’t really remember much of it. But he went everywhere. From Toronto to Florida. He didn’t seem inclined to go back. He vacations in Slovenia, to go skiing. He has two kids, been married 12 years, something like that. He seems to really love what he does.

Rachel: “What do you think you need to have to be a good tour guide?”
Davor, after thinking a bit: “You have to like people. And you have to be a good psychologist.”

Fantastic answer.

After lunch?

Posted in Personal | Tagged | Leave a comment

For Film Comment: On The Canterville Ghost (1944)

This marks my third piece this month having to do with Oscar Wilde. My latest for Film Comment is a review of the film adaptation (one of many) of Wilde’s ghost story The Canterville Ghost. This one stars Charles Laughton.

My essay on The Canterville Ghost is now up at Film Comment.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Croatia: At the movies: Split’s Kinoteka Zlatna Vrata

By the time we got back to Split, it was full-on November weather. The storm was passing, these gigantic clouds sweeping out of the sky, leaving the world chilly, windy, almost frosty. Rachel and I walked along the waterfront, wishing we had scarves and hats. Just that morning in Trogir, it was hot and sunny. The water was a dark midnight blue, whipped up into waves. There’s something about being in a “storied” place like that waterfront, active and important since antiquity. You feel the millennia in every viewpoint. Maybe if you live there you get used to it.

So stunning.

Now, on this particular evening I had planned my own adventure, based on a tip from an Instagram friend – and movie buff – who grew up in Split. She told me to go check out the Cinematheque, located within Diocletian’s Palace. Apparently there are more little movie theatres in there, but this was the one she told me to go to. It’s called the Kinoteka Zlatna Vrata (Golden Gate). I was so excited. I had checked out the website, and figured out – with help from Google translate – that there was a half-hour long movie playing on the night in question. It was the only time I could really go. Half an hour long, directed by a Polish husband-wife team? Sure, of course! Next up came the challenge of finding the theatre. I’m not kidding when I say it took me three tries. Ante had showed me where it was on the map – just inside the Golden Gate of the Palace. I walked up and down looking for it. There were shops (including a Game of Thrones shop), and cafes, but I saw nothing that looked like a theatre. Later on, we got some gelato and I asked the serving girl if she knew where it was. I showed her the address, plus the map, and she basically said, “It’s right inside the Golden Gate” … just like Ante had said. So I went back to the area, determined to suss the place out. Finally, I found it.

It was right where it was supposed to be, but it was basically a long dark hallway, with a gate over the entrance before showtime. No sign. No arrow leading in. You had to know where it was. Not for tourists.

I got there about half an hour early and the gate was still shut, locked, lights off. I wandered around for a bit. It was very cold. The Palace had emptied out, somewhat, giving it an extremely different energy. The sky was grey and low. The sky made the arches and ruins look very different. Moodier, turned in on themselves, even more grand. Secretive and quiet.

By the time I got back to the movie theatre, the gate was open, and some lights were on in the hallway, shining on the posters.

The Zlatna Vrata is, hands down, the coolest movie theatre I have ever been to. The entire time I was there I felt like I was tiptoeing into a magical world, which – honestly – is how a movie theatre SHOULD feel. There’s a small lobby on the ground floor, and then you have to climb up two flights of stairs to get to the theatre itself. On the second floor is an office area, behind glass doors. The theatre – maybe 100 seats? – is at the top, behind black painted doors. I was the first one there, so I didn’t have any crowds to follow. I felt shy. This was clearly an event for insiders, subscribers to the theatre, cinephiles in the area (it ended up being a packed house, for this half-hour screening: a testament to the dedication to cinema in the community. The fact that the directors were there for a QA afterwards just intensified my impression of a serious and enthusiastic moviegoing community.)

The theatre opened in 1958, with wooden chairs, some of which were lined up on the first floor, on display.

I took the stairs up, soaking up the atmosphere. The white walls were lined with posters.

Marlon Brando and … Roman-era walls outside the window. Pure magic, a wrinkle in time spanning 1,700 years.

I wasn’t sure what I was doing since no one else was around, but it ended up being perfect. I walked through the black doors on the top floor, and found myself alone in the theatre. It’s a small space, but with a high ceiling. The chairs are orange and yellow, and each one has a famous name on it, so you’re surrounded by the history of cinema. I walked around, to the back of the theatre to get the lay of the land. It was quiet, but with a small echo, the acoustics in the room are excellent. Enclosed within the walls of Diocletian’s Palace, this place is a small enclave, a quiet and serious place for people to gather, people with one overriding passion. Not only does the Palace have a lengthy history but so does the Zlatna Vrata. 60 years of operation.

Stunning.

I practically had the same sensation in that theatre that I had had looking at St. James Cathedral, or any of the other sights we witnessed. History here, soaked into the walls.

I settled myself down into Ava Gardner’s chair. It was about 5 minutes before anyone else showed up. It felt luxurious, to be there, to sit alone in the silence. One by one people arrived. Many seemed to know one another. Eventually the place was about 80% full. The movie we were about to see – called Who Am I? – was the only thing on the schedule for the night. The turnout was impressive. The guy who I assumed was the programmer gave an introduction to the film and introduced the two directors, who spoke briefly about the film (with the programmer translating into Croatian). So the conversation was Polish, Croatian, and English. After the movie, which was an exploration of the human essence, or soul, or whatever you want to call it. One of my favorite experiences on earth is the sensation of succumbing to whatever it is I’m watching. There’s something about abdicating the normal processes of your mind – its concerns and worries – and giving over to somebody else’s vision. It’s meditative. This is why I turn my phone off when I’m watching a movie at home. It helps provide that headspace.

Afterwards, there was a QA, moderated by the programmer. People spoke in English, which was then translated into Croatian. The audience was serious, engaged, enthusiastic … open, is the word for it.

I felt honored to be there, to quietly join the flow of their close community, hang out for a bit, and then leave, enriched.

It was absolutely magical. I can’t wait to go back.

Rachel and I were going to meet up later for a drink. It was about 8:30, 9. The Palace was practically empty. I walked around. The wind whipped through those long narrow stone alleys. There were tables for cafes, all empty. There were no crowds. I can’t even express what it felt like to walk around in that place, all by myself. There were times when I was completely alone, standing in a space surrounded by walls built by the Romans, and the only 21st century thing there was me, and my cell phone. It was an absolutely profound experience. You can look up and see the sky, of course, and there are “street” lights, but shadows predominated. This is not a museum. It’s a part of the city. It was a cold night, nobody was going to be hanging out at an outdoor wine bar. Tables sat there empty. Doors locked. Quiet.

I touched the walls. I pressed my back against the walls so I could get some perspective on whatever empty space I was staring in. The amazing gravity-defying arches of the Romans (how did they DO that? And these arches still stand … it’s just goosebump-worthy), the thick outer wall, the spaces near the gates originally built for chariots, horses … now just open and empty.

I walked around the perimeter, staring up at the outer wall, black sky behind it. This is what Ante was talking about on our drive to the hotel from the airport: Diocletian built this palace as a retirement home, a place where he could relax. But there were also fort-like elements – since he could never TOTALLY relax. These outer walls stretch up to the sky.

Looks like Emperor Diocletian is a night owl.

The whole night was like being caught in a spell: I just needed to be still and quiet enough to sense the sweep of millennia. It was all right there.

Then Rachel and I had a hilarious interlude where we figured out where the real roof terrace was, but it was closed due to the gale-force winds, and we went there anyway, and had to hang on for dear life. But the view of Split really was to die for! As good as promised!

We only lasted up there for about a minute and a half though. We were afraid we would blow away.

Posted in Movies, Personal | Tagged | 5 Comments

Croatia: To Šibenik and back

We left Trogir and headed on to Šibenik. Clouds now filled the sky. We learned later from Davor that part of the road between Zagreb and Split had closed this particular day, because the wind was too ferocious. By the time we got to Šibenik, dark grey clouds churned through the sky, and the wind was enormous, flags standing straight out, laundry on the wine sticking out parallel to the ground … Rachel and I were like, “Where did this COME from? And WHY did we not bring our down parkas to Croatia in September?”

Šibenik is an historic city on a little hill, facing a small river, where the only access to the larger sea is via a narrow channel (pointed out to us by Ante). When we arrived it seemed nearly deserted, probably because rain was coming and everyone had gone inside, and tourists weren’t really traveling that day because of the weather. Whatever the reason, when we walked into the main square of the old town, there were only a couple of people wandering around.

There are many reasons to come to Šibenik. It’s one of those important cities/ports along the Dalmatian coast that was captured, re-captured, captured again, over the centuries, by the Byzantine, Venetian, Austro-Hungarian empire. It’s always been a crucial port city. The main attraction is St. James Cathedral, which is what we had come to see.

Ante gave us the bare bones details, and you could feel his enthusiasm: “It is a masterpiece.”

I haven’t really written about the limestone of Croatia. By the end of the week, Rachel and I felt like minor experts in limestone, its qualities and properties, its uses, its look and feel, why it is good, why it is problematic as a building block… It was limestone-limestone-limestone all the way through Croatia. If you feel like asking “Is that limestone?” maybe stop, because 99 times out of 100 the answer will be “Yes.” Limestone has almost a soft crumbly look, and it doesn’t just reflect the light – it seems to absorb it into its pores, emitting a glow from within. There was no glow on this day in Šibenik, since the storm clouds were gathering.

St. James is one of the most important sites for Croatian Catholics. And small wonder. Ante was right. This limestone cathedral is a masterpiece. Unlike the other buildings we had seen, the limestone of St. James had no mortar in between the stones, no connective tissue. “The blocks are like Legos,” Ante said, “So you can take the whole thing apart and re-build it somewhere else if you want.” Extraordinary!

It wasn’t open so we couldn’t go inside. I love the thought that regular masses are still held in these historic buildings. That THIS is where you go to church on Sundays.

Ante had said to us, before he dropped us off, “Along the left side of the building are 72 human heads.”
“Wait, what?”
“Look for the human heads. Nobody knows who they are. But they think maybe they were the patrons who helped pay for the building. They think a couple of them are Popes.”

We were very intrigued. After wandering around in front of the building, we moved off to the left hand side, and immediately saw the line of human heads. You can actually see them in two of the photos of the Cathedral above. Once we got close to them, we realized how unique they all were. These are not idealized portraits. They are practically photographic in their specificity. They look like regular people, like this must have been what they actually looked like. If you ran into them today, you’d recognize them. Just amazing. Who are they?

If they were patrons and popes, that’s all very nice … but the EFFECT is somewhat grisly. It LOOKS like they were enemies of the church, decapitated heads on display as warnings to those who would follow in their footsteps.

The entire place is so rich with history, much of it unknown. The place exists. But it’s so old – 13th century, 14th century – that much of its history is lost to us. But look at it. What an amazing accomplishment of architecture. I feel fortunate we saw it on a grey day, the wind whipping our hair around, with a couple of other quiet people wandering around. Šibenik is a city but we didn’t see much of it. We hung out in that square, and then down on the marina, watching as these bruised clouds massed up above us, the clanking of the boats and buoys filling the air. The water was dark. The whole place was so beautiful I’d love to go back.

We drove back to Split through a rainstorm. I don’t think we went back the way we came. My memory is that we were driving through these back areas, with crumbling small villages, not much else going on, the trees bending all the way over in the wind, parts of the roads flooded. We pulled into a small restaurant perched on the side of the road – in the middle of what felt like nowhere – because it was time for lunch, and Ante wanted us to have lamb. He had the whole thing planned out. “We do fish one day, we do sausages another day, and now you have to have lamb.” We did not question him or resist. Who could resist Ante? He wanted us to get the full spectrum of Croatian cuisine. We were the only ones in the restaurant. The rain battered the windows. The meal was delicious.

Posted in Personal | Tagged | Leave a comment

Supernatural Season 14 premiere

Initial thoughts:

“Not bad, old man.”
“You too, sunshine.”
Beer bottle clink.

I haaaaaated that.

Ackles, as usual, is doing very interesting work. It’s depth-ful, as everything he does is. Dean isn’t even “in his eyes,” not a little bit, and whatever he is doing doesn’t look like “acting”. He’s inhabiting something, or something is inhabiting him. I enjoyed watching him. It’s pretty intricate what he’s doing: voice, physicality, the look in his eyes, the intonation. I also enjoyed his watch chain.

The AU has just messed everything up. I hate the AU. So now we have the bunker (ARGH THE BUNKER I HATE IT) filled with people, one of whom is Bobby – yay, familiar face – and yet there isn’t the old relationship between Bobby and Sam. So we get Bobby, but we don’t get everything ELSE. I mean, this just seems like a dumb and pandering choice.

Mary continues to be a huge problem for me. Mary is a symbol for me of every single thing that has gone wrong in this series since those disastrous final three episodes of Season 11.

The huge fight scene was awful. The music underneath, the sudden slo-mo. One of the high points of the series was the fight scenes: beautifully choreographed, and so well acted that it actually felt like it was going on. Visceral. What happens when you break the action down, when you slow it down, when you chop it up into little edited pieces – you lose a layer of reality. And the experience becomes … empty. Went into that here.

I don’t mind Sam and Dean being apart. I don’t mind the prospect of Dean being gone for a while. I think it could be very very interesting. At least it’s a break in what has become some pretty tiresome action. It also gives me a chance to watch Ackles take on another role, something we haven’t seen from this actor in 14 years. It’s exciting.

Padalecki did wonderful work. He was the center of the episode. I liked the scene with Mary in the car, mainly because he was resisting her pep talk. I realize that Mary is a huge blind spot for the team in charge currently. I think they’re really really proud of making Mary a “badass,” of having her not be “just” a mother – and they don’t realize what a huge betrayal of the pilot this choice is. It’s different than the time-travel episodes when we learned Mary’s backstory. In those episodes, Mary got to be a hunter, but she also got to be a loving mother and wife. She was hugely vulnerable. She was funny. All of that is gone. And my sense is that they’re PROUD of this, they think what they’re doing is “feminist.” Will get brownie points from us. But without Mary as an emotional galvanizing force (whether she’s onscreen or not), the series loses SO MUCH. Padalecki’s resistance to her “everything’s going to be okay” felt really really strong – and I so wished for some kind of explosion, or at least acknowledgement – “You don’t get to give me advice, you died, you came back and then left us again – I’ll work with you but I’m pissed off at you and blah blah blah” … I FELT it in his reaction. But I have no trust that the team in charge are even aware of those possibilities, so proud are they of turning Mary into some dumb action hero, bursting through the door with her gun.

The true possibilities of Mary – what she represents – do not seem to be apparent to those writing her.

It’s hard for me to get past it.

Posted in Television | Tagged | 68 Comments