2023 National Society of Film Critics Awards

I was voted into the National Society of Film Critics this year and we had our voting meeting today. The group is nationwide so there were groups in LA, a group in New York, and people Zooming in from Chicago, other places, etc. The New York contingent met at the Elinor Bunim theatre at Lincoln Center. I’m glad to be a part of it, and of course I already know everybody! I like our results because there’s some diversity there, some difference from other lists. It was a strong year! Lots of films. Not a lot of consensus. Lack of consensus is a sign of health! There’s a lot going on! I am mainly pleased that Aki Kaurismäki’s beautiful Fallen Leaves won our awkwardly-named award Film Not in the English Language. I keep voting for the film in different lists – and R.M.N. too – and obviously I’m not the only one who loves these films but votes are a numbers game! And today, Fallen Leaves had the numbers (in a very strong field). Really happy we awarded it!

I’ve reviewed a couple of these!
All Of Us Strangers
May December

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Review: Society of the Snow (2024)

First review of 2024: A review of Society of the Snow, the latest filmed version of the Andes plane crash in 1972.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

#tbt Summer

Hot sunny Chicago summer. Barbecue in the tiny backyard of my friends David and Maria’s apartment. My friend Ted and I – color coordinated, we did not plan it – together: it was shortly before he moved back to New York. I still see him, on average, once every couple of months. Lifelong friends. The other person we called “Hubbell”, after The Way We Were, and his boyfriend was Tigh and … I guess I should drop a link to this post – which I wrote a long long time ago – to explain Tigh and Hubbell. Tigh just sent this to me, and … I’d never seen it before (although I have my own pictures from that party). What’s wild is … I just realized I don’t think I have any pictures of Ted and me together. And now I do! We were only a couple of years into our friendship here.

See, I come from the generation where you have a limited amount of pictures of any given moment, and of course you weren’t sharing pictures online, where you get to see your friend’s pictures of the same event. You know your own photo album. And so to see pics from other people’s analog photo albums of the same event is wild and very welcome.

Posted in Personal | Tagged , | 2 Comments

2023 Books Read

I think I might have read more books by non-American authors than American this year. Countries represented below: Austria, Hungary, Poland, Germany, Czechoslovakia, Croatia, Ireland, France, Russia, Colombia. I revisited some old favorites, which I will continue to do in 2024. I read widely this year, and “met” some brand new (to me) authors, and feel enriched by the encounters. Lots of horror here though. The ravages of the 20th century as told by those who survived.

1. A Rage in Harlem, by Chester Himes
My nephew Cashel gave me this fantastic often-hilarious noir, set in Harlem, featuring a sequence involving a runaway hearse that made me laugh out loud. I read it in one setting on a rainy day in Memphis, when I stepped into a nearly-empty blues club on Beale Street to get out of the rain. I sat there, had a beer, listened to the music being played by a live trio up on the stage, and read. It was a great way to start the year. And now I have read Chester Himes. I feel sad I didn’t read him earlier but it’s never too late to meet a new author!

2. The Captive Mind, by Czesław Miłosz
A second time through. It’s good to hear from this particular front. I feel like it will bolster me up and sharpen my senses to recognize what is happening as it is happening. The times are so chaotic (I suppose every “time” is chaotic) it’s easy to lose your perspective. Miłosz went through it, and saw the effects of propaganda on a population – all the captive minds – and the different personality types that emerged under such pressure.

3. My Face for the World to See, by Alfred Hayes
I’m not sure how this one came into my sight-lines but I am so glad it did. It’s a little ice pick of a tale, a Hollywood story with a noir-ish vibe. While at a Hollywood party at a house on the beach, the screenwriter narrator (Hayes was a screenwriter real life) rescues a girl attempting to drown herself in the ocean. (Shades of Ida Lupino in Moontide, and a host of other stories.) The girl has been trying to “make it” in Hollywood and … yeah, things aren’t going so well. She’s lost. He’s married but the wife is back on the East Coast. The girl has been around the block, so the two start a little affair. He makes the mistake of thinking they’re on the same page. He can’t see the red flags. He thinks this fragile girl knows the score, he thinks she’s capable of having a casual fling. This is a slim little book, over in a flash, but it’s DEEP.

4. For the Sake of Argument: Essays and Minority Reports , by Christopher Hitchens
There are these older collections of Hitchens’ essays, dating back to the 80s, and either they’re back in print or I somehow just never tracked them down. Some of it is tough going because he’s writing about some act of Parliament or some ruckus in Congress that seemed super important in 1984 and I have no idea what the hell is going on. I don’t read too many people JUST for the writing, the sentences, the references, how he puts a paragraph together. He’s so good at openers. I watch and (try to) learn.

5. Grand Hotel, by Vicki Baum
I can’t believe I never read this before. I practically know the movie by heart but never read the book. It’s a masterpiece.

6. Hell’s Angels, by Hunter S. Thompson
I love HST but I had never read this one before. I miss him.

7. This is Pleasure, by Mary Gaitskill
This made me uncomfortable and I loved it. It ruffled feathers. I love that too. Gaitskill is not known for playing it safe.

8. Aline MacMahon: Hollywood, the Blacklist, and the Birth of Method Acting, by John Strangeland
I adore Aline MacMahon (her name comes up here often!) and it was fascinating to learn more about her life in this recent biography. I always knew she was special, and worked in a different way than many of her peers. You can TELL. She was usually cast as a sidekick, in films, on the wisecracking periphery of events (the exception being the excellent Heat Lightning – corrected! Thank you Bill!!), although she was a leading lady on Broadway. She arrived in Hollywood and instantly got pretty substantial parts, maybe because she was clearly a grown woman already and not starlet-material. She was young and incredibly beautiful, but she seemed seasoned, mature. She “read” as older than she was. A great talent: she took her craft seriously. I loved learning more about her.

9. Hello, Molly!: A Memoir, by Molly Shannon
It’s wonderful. Painful, though. The tragedy of her childhood … my God.

10. The Pump House Gang, by Tom Wolfe
Talk about someone entertaining. I’d read some of these before. The Hugh Hefner one I definitely knew. But a lot of these were new to me.

11. Earthly Signs: Moscow Diaries, 1917-1922, by Marina Tsvetaeva
This was a very tough read. The pain, the poverty, the panic, the absolutely helpless situation … it’s even worse knowing what’s coming. Tsvetaeva was a celebrated poet, good friends with Anna Akhmatova, and the two shared similar(ish) fates. The years immediately post-Revolution were horrific, filled with violence and deprivations, famine and war, and Tsvetaeva found it impossible to find food. She had two children. She had to travel miles, by bus, by train, on foot, to get a bag of half-rotten potatoes. She was so desperate she ended up putting one of her daughters into an orphanage, thinking the daughter would have a better shot at survival there. Tsvetaeva was wrong. The daughter died. Her husband was lured back to Moscow from living in exile, promised a place in the new regime. It was a trap. He was executed. Tsvetaeva committed suicide in 1941. Some lives are just more difficult than others. It’s the luck of the draw: where you are born and, more crucially, what year. If you were a European or Russian, and you were born in the 1880s/1890s, you were fucked. Tsvetaeva was born in 1892. I am not familiar with her poetry (she published her first volume of poetry at age 16), but I picked this up because I’m fascinated by those years – the late teens and early 20s in brand new Soviet Russia. Total chaos.

12. Chess Story, by Stefan Zweig
He’s one of the very best. This novella is swift and disturbing, written very near the tragic end of his life.

13. The Burning of the World: A Memoir of 1914, by Béla Zombory-Moldován
An incredible first-person account of the summer of 1914 and Austria-Hungary going to war, as told by a young artist living a pampered idyllic life, called away from summer vacation to go join the army. One of the images burned into my brain is the part where the troops – after a couple of weeks of doing drills, marching, and looking left, all the pomp and circumstance – actually go into battle for the first time, using these out-moded antiquated tactics, completely inappropriate for the carnage awaiting them. Here they are, marching along, their long swords bumping against their calves, trying to follow protocol, as the world burned. It really shows just how ridiculous that empire was, how out of touch, how it was dead before it died. Fantastic.

14. Screen Tests, by Kate Zambreno
She came on my radar because of Cal Morgan’s posts about her – and this book – on Instagram. I inhaled it, reading it probably way too quickly, so much so I feel I could re-read it right now and discover things I missed. I loved her thoughts on Barbara Loden’s Wanda, but there was so much else to savor. Her writing makes me want to write. I mean, I write anyway, but her writing makes me want to write more.

15. A Memoir of the Warsaw Uprising, by Miron Białoszewski
What a wild book. Apparently it was fairly controversial when it was published, because this first-person account shows the Warsaw Uprising not from the center of the action, but from the sides. The populace of Warsaw racing to and fro, trying to find escape routes, dodging bullets, scurrying through the sewer lines to the other side of town, avoiding certain blocks, etc. Not exactly a heroic account – or, at least, not explicitly. But it puts you there, on those streets. You feel the panic. There’s a street map at the beginning of the book, so you can literally follow the action, step by step. You take a left on this street, backtrack, go through a side street … and you can visualize it because of the detailed map.

16. Black Swans, by Eve Babitz
She’s so deliriously entertaining, with piercing moments of sincerity, pathos, poetry. An avatar for all pleasure-seeking careless women everywhere, the women who don’t save up for tomorrow, who have no concept of conserving their energy for a rainy day.

17. All Will Be Well: A Memoir, by John McGahern
One of my favorite authors. He’s hard for me to re-read because he is so associated with my father. Dad was the one who pointed me in McGahern’s direction. Specifically, McGahern’s Amongst Women, one of my favorite novels of all time. McGahern didn’t write that many novels. I have read them all. Dad gave me McGahern’s memoir All Will Be Well for Christmas or my birthday. So. This was years and years ago. I haven’t been able to bring myself to read it because Dad is gone, and it’s a little bit too poignant (and painful, since I won’t be able to talk with him about it). I finally decided to read it. It’s so good. What’s interesting is his childhood takes up the majority of it. 3/4s of it. He sums up his adolescence/young adult life in less than 100 pages at the end. They are, essentially, not important. Everything important happened to him as a child, and those events where what he wrote from. The relationship with his parents, his father in particular. I recognize the father – tragic, flawed, difficult, a little scary – in Amongst Women. In that book, as you can see from the title, it’s about the daughters’ connection to their dad, and the brother has fled to England, just to get away from the family home – which is exactly what McGahern did. And so it makes Amongst Women even greater, knowing it was written in an act of imaginative empathy, stepping into his sisters’ experiences, and why they chose to stay so close to this man, who was so difficult and hurtful and poignant. It’s more complicated than The Great Santini, although there are similarities. The perception of the child … finally understanding his father is a flawed person, and then – the electric moment – when the son realizes he can “take” his father. At long last. He will not be bullied anymore. This is a painful book, but beautifully written.

18. Last Times, by Victor Serge
As with most of Serge’s writing, Last Times, his novel of the Fall of France, was written on the run. Pursued by multiple enemies, Stalin’s minions and others, he ended up in Mexico, I think around the time Trotsky – also in Mexico – was assassinated. Serge needed cash. Badly. But because of the Socialist-leaning Russia-loving tendencies of the American press, nobody would publish him. Because of course an actual Russian person – a Russian revolutionary, no less – shouldn’t be listened to once he criticized Stalin – because of course American liberals knew more about what was going on in Russia than the actual Russian refugee. Don’t get me started. He wrote Last Times to be a best-seller, a crowd-pleaser. He needed it to sell. And it did. It’s about the fates of all of the citizens of one city block in Paris: what each one did, as the Nazis approached. So it’s an ensemble book, almost cinematic. Very different from his other books. I loved it!

19. The Culture of Lies, by Dubravka Ugrešić
She died this year. Her Museum of Unconditional Surrender is such an excellent meditation/evocation of the experience of living in exile, which she did for decades, being unable to return to Croatia, due to all the death threats she received. A major voice. We are lucky she’s been translated. So many others are not. And so these major voices may as well not exist to the English-speaking world. I decided to branch out and read her essays (there are multiple collections). This one is made up of her political essays. They are indispensable reading. She, in general, is indispensable.

20. The Book of Laughter and Forgetting, by Milan Kundera
I decided to re-read the work of Milan Kundera this year. I didn’t get very far, but I enjoyed re-visiting this one. I haven’t read it since college. Kundera weaves personal stories with the political: even as deeply as he gets into the teeny moments making up romantic and family relationships, the real story is what it is like living in a country where memory is abolished. Where people can vanish. Where cancel culture is official government policy. Kundera is breathtakingly transparent in his exploration of these kind of cold lothario men, men with prolific but empty sex lives. Men who wreak havoc on women’s lives. He knows this terrain well.

21. Liquidation, by Imre Kertész
The Hungarian novelist, Imre Kertész, won the Nobel Prize in 2002. During WWII, he was imprisoned at first in Auschwitz and then Buchenwald. He worked as a journalist and translator afterwards and moved – kind of amazingly, all things considered – to Germany. I’m going to explore more of his work based on the power of this one. Hungary is haunted by the decades of Communism and the Holocaust, and this national history infected the population. It’s not like communism ends and then everyone’s like “Yay!!” It is a land of ghosts. Of horrible memories, personal and inherited. The novel starts with a suicide.

22. Partygoing, by Henry Green
My God, WHAT IS THIS BOOK. How have I never heard of this novelist? It is very very much “my kind of thing”. It’s not a long book, and it takes place in one room, as a bunch of people wait for a delayed train. But it’s DENSE. I had to keep re-reading passages just to make sure all the events landed and stuck. It was an exhilarating experience and I will tear through the rest of his work in 2024. I am hooked.

23. Homage to Catalonia, by George Orwell
A re-read. I revisit his work often.

24. The Portrait of Mr. W.H: Uncover The Identity of The Enigmatic Dedicatee of Shakespeare’s Sonnets, by Oscar Wilde
I love Oscar Wilde but I had never heard of this. It’s a short story about a man who goes insane investigating “Mr. W.H.”, name-checked on the title page of Shakespeare’s sonnets. “To the onlie begetter of these insuing sonnets Mr. W.H. All happinesse and that eternitie promised.” Who is W.H.? The Portrait of Mr. W.H., like Dorian Gray, shows the inevitable end-stop of obsession: madness.

25. Prepared for the Worst: Selected Essays and Minority Reports, by Christopher Hitchens
More of earlier Hitchens. Published in 1988. I get some horrible flashbacks reading these older collections. It’s like flash-cards of national ridiculousness. Oh God, Iran Contra. etc. Snapshots of these major world events – like the fall of the Berlin Wall – written about in real time, the immediacy of response is essential reporting.

26. Memories of Starobielsk: Essays Between Art and History, by Józef Czapski
A couple of years ago I read the English translation of Czapski’s Lost time: lectures on Proust in a Soviet prison camp. Czapski was a Polish army officer captured by the Soviet Army and held in a prison camp for months and months. He was one of thousands. Basically the entire upper brass of the Polish military was held captive. Most of them were massacred in the Katyn forest (which the Russians blamed on the Germans, and that rumor “stuck” for 60, 70 years – until finally the truth was acknowledged, relatively recently, that yes, the Russian army killed 22,000 people and threw them in mass graves. 22,000 people.) It’s incredible that Czapski survived this. Very few people walked away from the Katyn forest. At any rate, while in prison, he gave a series of lectures on Proust’s 6-volume opus. The notes survive, and they were finally published. Of course these lectures he gave were completely from memory since he was in prison. I think his most famous book was Inhuman Land – which I’ll read in 2024 – but this book is a memoir of his time in the POW camp.

27. Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism, by Anne Applebaum
Depressing. But important.

28. Hotel Theory, by Wayne Koestenbaum
One of THE reads of the year for me.

29. The Banquet in Blitva, by Miroslav Krleža
Dubravka Ugrešić mentioned this book in one of her essays and it sounded amazing. How had I never heard of it before? Well, here we are again, facing the problem of translation. Miroslav Krleža is a massive figure in Croatian literature. I could just be ignorant and unaware (highly possible) but I had flat out never heard of him, despite my at-this-point lifelong interest in the region. So I bought it. It’s a satire, basically, a biting one – and eerily prescient. The Banquet in Blitva was published in 1939, a terrible year, and the book is clearly powered by the winds of evil blowing through Europe. Chaos stalking the land and etc. But the book is not just about 1939, or the years prior. It’s about a fictional little country called Blitva, caught up in the vice of totalitarian control. The lead character is desperate to get to the country next door, called Blatva, and once he gets there … it’s exactly the same. There is no escape. Krleža goes after everything: the ridiculousness of these little dictators, the passivity of the population, the bourgeois having their parties all as danger is unleashed, the artists, the censorship, the oppression … The Banquet in Blitva is a freakin’ masterpiece.

30. The Kingdom of Speech, by Tom Wolfe
Tom Wolfe goes after Charles Darwin. lol

31. The Little Blue Kite, by Mark Z. Danielewski
A gorgeously illustrated children’s book by the sui generis Danielewski, whose books – particularly House of Leaves – have gained cult status. I am a member of the cult.

32. Ulysses, by James Joyce
I re-read it this year! And this time I decided to do it with the assistance of Ulysses Annotated, this massive book detailing every single reference on every single page. I’ve had the annotated Ulysses for 20 years or something, but never used it. I read Ulysses for the first time flying solo, with occasional calls to Dad for clarification. (I wrote about my history with the book in this year’s Bloomsday post.) I just tossed myself into it and didn’t worry too much about what I “got” or didn’t get. I took my Dad’s advice: “Don’t take it too seriously.” I still think that’s the best way to experience the book for the first time. Don’t be too precious with it. Don’t be intimidated. It’s really not all that serious! Yes, you’ll miss a lot of stuff he’s doing, but the “stuff he’s doing” is … fucking around with language. Like, that’s the point. It’s great when you pick up on stuff on your own – you feel so smart – but referring to the Ulysses Annotated was fantastic and illuminating, even though it slowed my reading down to a crawl. Still: if you have the time or inclination I highly recommend reading it this way (not your first time, though; you’ll get bogged down). There were some revelations and discoveries. For example: I get what’s going on in the Aeolus episode, it’s not obscure, the language is obvious and everyday and recognizable, made up of all the different conversations going on in the newspaper office, interspersed with blaring headlines. So: the episode taking place in the newspaper office is written in the style of an actual newspaper. Got it. But the Annotated Ulysses showed me everything ELSE that was going on. Joyce using the “winds” episode as an excuse to weave in as many rhetorical devices as he could into the language. I hadn’t picked up on that at all in my first read. Getting into the rhetoric, the whole episode cracked open for me. I kept my eyes peeled and tried to find each device on my own, although my God there are 100s of rhetorical devices I’ve never even heard of. I wrote about it on my Substack.

33. Ulysses Annotated: Notes for James Joyce’s Ulysses, by Don Gifford and Robert J. Seidman
See above.

34. Bing and Billie and Frank and Ella and Judy and Barbra, by Dan Callahan
Dan Callahan’s latest book is so good. I loved it so much! I interviewed him about it for Ebert.

35. The North Ship, by Philip Larkin
I decided to read Larkin’s four published books of poetry. I mean, what the hell else am I gonna do with my time. I’m going to be honest. He scares me a little bit. I know the famous poems but haven’t read it all in full so maybe I wanted to face my fears. There are poems about loneliness and then there’s Larkin’s stuff. His loneliness is – seemingly – chosen but it’s also existential – there’s no God, no respite – it makes me shiver a bit. It’s like a dead end. His stuff is NOT pleasant but it’s also perfect.

36. The Rub of Time: Bellow, Nabokov, Hitchens, Travolta, Trump: Essays and Reportage, 1994-2017, by Martin Amis
Speaking of crotchety Englishmen … I gave this to my brother for Christmas (he’s a huge Amis-head). The essays are excellent. He couldn’t seem to stop writing about Nabokov. All are worthwhile.

37. Seduction and Betrayal: Women and Literature, by Elizabeth Hardwick
I love Hardwick but I had never read this volume. It’s so thought-provoking. I’ve read all the books she discusses so that makes it even more interesting. She comes at things from such a unique angle and God, can she write.

38. Hope Against Hope, by Nadezhda Mandelstam
I FEEL like I’ve read this memoir because it’s referenced so often in all the other books I’ve read about Russia and Stalin and etc. But that’s a cheat so I decided to go to the source. It’s devastating. A shriek of outrage, a howl of pain, an indelible example of living life under unimaginable pressures, tragedy, and terror. A monument to survival.

39. Less Deceived, by Philip Larkin
Volume 2.

40. No One Is Talking About This, by Patricia Lockwood
I’ll read anything Patricia Lockwood writes. It’s hard to explain but this novel captures our Right Now in a way other more self-conscious “relevant” books do not. Lockwood captures the experience of being online all the time, the almost unreal nature of our bifurcated lives right now, things we don’t even question anymore, but … it’s a little weird if you actually start to think about it (particularly if you have memories of the Time Before). In the book, Lockwood (or the first-person narrator) doesn’t even call it “the internet”. She calls it “the portal”. Every day the narrator enters “the portal”. There are rules in the portal. It’s a place, not technology we use. The narrator is a woman with a big social media platform. She’s got “fans” all over the world. Then she gets “canceled” – although the word is never used. No One Is Talking About This (such a great title) is told from a woman so inside the portal it basically IS her personality, although some things are starting to get screwy. Does she have her own thoughts anymore or are her thoughts the portals? (It’s not natural to be in touch with all of humanity all day every day. We aren’t built for it.) Then something real happens. And it’s a huge challenge to adjust, to leave the portal. The portal feels realler than the so-called real world. Like I said, No One Is Talking About This is very Right Now without being cutesy or trendy.

41. Into the Dream, by William Sleator
I adored this book as a child. My brother did too. I have a copy – the same hardcover copy I had as a kid – with beautiful haunting illustrations. I think the last time I read it I was 11 years old. It holds up so well. I wonder if the Duffer brothers read it as kids. There’s a lot of Stranger Things here. Children having supernatural experiences and being chased by shadowy government forces. Published in 1979. It’s terrific.

42. The Whitsun Weddings, by Philip Larkin
Volume 3. He’s so upsetting. It’s like he expresses my deepest darkest fears. I don’t even want to look at it.

43. On Histories and Stories: Selected Essays, by A.S. Byatt
The fall was so busy I didn’t have time to mark her passing. One of my favorite writers. Very very important to me. I knew she was getting up there but I still was not prepared. Possession was the beginning of the love affair. It’s so fortunate she was so prolific. I got to look forward to new books by Byatt for decades. And the variety was stunning! Literary essays, re-telling of old myths, fairy tales, novels, short stories … I hadn’t read this volume, made up of different lectures she gave on storytelling.

44. Dubliners, by James Joyce
Read it start to finish, which is really the only way to read it. Each story works as a stand-alone, but the power of Dubliners is cumulative. I think of Joyce being in his early 20s writing these stories and can’t even believe it. Like … how?

45. Cary Grant’s Suit: Nine Movies That Made Me the Wreck I Am Today, by Todd McEwen
God, I loved this. I read it in a single afternoon.

46. High Windows, by Philip Larkin
Reading poem after poem in a row, all in one, for two months straight, was difficult. I don’t find him depressing. I find him unsettling.

47. A Nation of Enemies: Chile Under Pinochet, by Pamela Constable and Arturo Valenzuela
Horrifying and scary.

48. The Guermantes Way, by Marcel Proust
Volume III! Slowly but surely making my way through. Second volume was a vacation to the seaside. Third volume is equal in length to the other two volumes and it basically describes two parties. The entire book is made up of two parties. It’s an 800-page version of Truman Capote’s La Cote Basque. Proust describes a society that’s already dead – only it doesn’t know it’s dead yet. The elite thinks it is still vital and important. They are silly and shallow. From the likes of it this society deserves to die. Even more fascinating, the Dreyfus Affair is the background noise for the entire volume. It’s what everyone is talking about.

49. The Age of Skin, by Dubravka Ugrešić
Another essay collection by this great writer.

50. Lives of the Saints, by Nancy Lemann
This comical whimsical poignant Southern novel came into my life at the right time. There’s not much to it, really. It takes place in New Orleans. A post-college girl re-immerses herself in the crackpot environment of her family and old friends, whirling through New Orleans in one long crazy party. Everyone’s an eccentric, everyone is falling apart. The book is often laugh out loud funny. Lemann’s prose is so distinct (I was so influenced by it there were a good two years where my journals sound like Lemann. Or were an attempt to sound like Lemann.). I bought it right before I moved to Chicago when I was ready to shrug off my old life. Or … punch my way out of the trap. I was young. Life had been so serious for about two years, three years, when I was in my first relationship with an older guy who was at a different life stage. Lemann’s outlook is tender and hilarious, fragile and ribald. She expresses a mindset, an outlook on life, that – unlike my old circumstances – suited me. I didn’t realize I would write all this much but it occurs to me I’ve never really written about Nancy Lemann. I have incorporated my favorite quote from one of her books (The Fiery Pantheon) in a couple of different reviews (or, I think I have. I used it in my review of Wes Anderson’s The French Dispatch. There might be more. I have to hold back from using it now). There’s more to be said about this book: when I bought it, why it hit me so hard, why it was important, why the “view” it expressed was so important for me and had an influence on how I approached my new life in Chicago. I bought the book at a little bookstore in … Oakland? Berkeley? Some place across the Golden Gate Bridge. I can’t remember how we ended up there. Did someone recommend it? Did we trip over it? I don’t know. I remember the bookstore layout vividly. It wasn’t a Barnes & Noble. It was independent owned. There was a big patio outside where people sat having coffee. I bought a couple of books there, based on the covers and the back cover copy. I went in with no prior knowledge, and had never heard of any of the authors before. The books were Joy Williams’ State of Grace, Jeanette Winterson’s Sexing the Cherry, and Lives of the Saints. The fact I picked these out randomly, on a whim, while in a desperate state of despair – like I was underground – just feels so fortuitous. Joy Williams is HUGE for me. Jeanette Winterson is even bigger. I have now had lifelong relationships with these authors. Unfortunately, Nancy Lemann hasn’t published in years. I keep hoping. Even just writing this little paragraph makes me feel like I want to write more. Having a comedic outlook on life dominated my 20s and it was very very important. I have enough distance now to see it as almost an inoculation (not quite, but almost) against the dark years that would follow. But I wanted to live in Lives of the Saints, I wanted hilarity and poetry and eccentricity and intense emotions. I got it. Claude Collier, the “hero” (or tragically attractive and dissipated anti-hero) of the book, was the initial way I interpreted/received M. (Window Boy). There were many differences – Claude wasn’t cranky like M. – but I felt in him that same tragically-attractive-dissipated-anti-hero thing – and he brought nothing but comedic good to my life. But I interpreted him as Claude Collier early. Almost immediately. I’m not sure if my perception of him as Claude-Collier-like was … one of the reasons why things went the way it did? i.e. became just what I needed? I mean, how many women have been wildly disappointed because the guy they thought was Mr. Darcy turned out to just be a dick? The opposite happened for me. I don’t know. It’s something to think about and maybe I’d like to explore this more. They are recent thoughts, which came out of this re-read. I realized I know a lot of this book by heart. All of her sonorous funny repetitive Southern sentences came flooding back with all these memories of those early years in Chicago, when the book was practically a guide for How to Live.

51. Conquered City, by Victor Serge
Another novel by on-the-run revolutionary Victor Serge, this time about the Bolshevik takeover of St. Petersburg in 1919-1920. Chaos and hopes: nothing working, trains not running, electricity shutting off, working class pride (they had no idea …), and storming all these government buildings from the Tsarist times (ended just a year earlier). It’s great.

52. Henry James: A Critical Biography, by Rebecca West
The only book of hers I have never read. It’s been long unavailable, and/or out of print. It was her first book. I think she might have been in her early 20s when she wrote it. Chris McCaffery, whose wonderful Washington Review of Books Substack I follow, brought out a small edition, which was available on Amazon. I snatched it up and read it in a day. Grateful!

53. Ms. Demeanor, by Elinor Lipman
Lipman is so great. I was turned onto her when my mother, randomly, gave me The Way Men Act for my birthday, years and years ago. I was instantly in love. I’ve been a fan ever since. She basically comes out with a novel a year, and her output is entertaining and reliable. Rom-coms may be dead in cinema but they are alive and well in Lipman’s books.

54. A Biography of Loneliness: The History of an Emotion, by Fay Bound Alberti
Sounded intriguing. But it was a bit of a bore.

55. Why Mariah Carey Matters, by Andrew Chan
Andrew Chan is a friend, an excellent writer, and editor at Criterion. He worked on my After Hours piece with me, and helped facilitate my call with Marty!, and he also worked with me on my piece on Elvis. I love his writing. He also writes about poets and poetry on occasion for 4 Columns, which I look forward to. His piece on Elizabeth Bishop was so damn good! This is his first book, a book he was BORN to write. He really knows music, and places Mariah in the proper context – vocally and culturally – while digging into her astonishing trajectory. There is also some analysis on why she hasn’t been taken as seriously as she should be (stardom notwithstanding). There’s a bias against her, and perhaps other diva-songbirds who specialize in dramatic ballads. I have some Mariah in my collection – and have a vivid memory of when she first appeared on the scene. Visions of Love. That album cover. The video. You have to have been there to know how huge it was. It wasn’t just a debut album of a new singer. It was like someone had ARRIVED. Very different experience. Her Christmas song is undiluted dopamine. I hadn’t really given her a lot of thought and Andrew is a great guide. I gave it to Siobhan for Christmas. She’s a huge Mariah fan. We went to her Christmas show together and had such a fabulous time.

56. Everybody: A Book about Freedom, by Olivia Laing
Nothing can top Lonely City, but she’s always a good read.

57. The Storyteller Essays, by Walter Benjamin
As famous as his “mechanical reproduction” and “angel of history” essays – maybe more famous. I had never read them. He was so brilliant. It’s almost scary. He’s hard to excerpt because his essays are so all of a piece.

58. Unwanted Advances: Sexual Paranoia Comes to Campus, by Laura Kipnis
A hot topic, which Kipnis obviously does not shy away from. The subject here is worth talking about, and she has personal experience with it, so it’s a dispatch from the frontlines.

59. My Misspent Youth: Essays, by Meghan Daum
I bought this collection – her first, I believe – after I read her essay about going into debt in The New Yorker years and years ago. Late 90s, maybe? It’s a more depressing and less privileged “Goodbye to All That”. Daum “tells on herself”. She is willing to paint herself in a bad light, although “paint yourself in a bad light” is a sketchy way of just saying “tell the truth”. None of us are perfect. She lived in a delusional dreamworld, attached to what her life should look like once she moved to New York. It had to do with the surface: a rambling pre-war apartment with hardwood floors, exposed brick, etc. She somehow missed the memo that New York wasn’t like that anymore. But she kept trying. She racked up debt, so much so she had to move out of the city. I was never in debt. I don’t have credit cards. I paid off my school loan (and it nearly killed me. I didn’t buy new shoes for like a decade. I never ever had enough money. It got really scary at times.) Even so, I never lived beyond my means. I don’t know why. I just never did. Her essay on debt is really scary. I’m not surprised it gained so much traction.

60. The Skin, by Curzio Malaparte
I was turned onto him because of The Kremlin Ball, his stories of hanging out with the Soviet “elite” (seemingly an oxymoron but apparently it wasn’t). I’ve been catching up with the rest of his work, out in English translation for the first time. This is his novel about Italy during WWII. He is basically the novelist of the Axis powers. It’s wild. His life seems too strange to even be true. His books read like autobiographies but … are they? Some of them read like evil fever dreams. He was a Mussolini supporter, then was imprisoned, got jobs as liaison to the Nazi brass, the liaison between American troops and Italians … all kinds of unsavory stuff, and then found himself an outcast/pariah in Paris after the war. He wrote these crazy novels (Kaputt, Kremlin Ball and this one) and they are grotesque and self-serving and unforgettable. I knew OF Malaparte because of his house on the Amalfi coast, featured, famously, in Godard’s Contempt.

61. Europe in Sepia, by Dubravka Ugrešić
It felt good and right to catch up with all her essay collections, in tribute to her the year she died.

62. The Faraway Years, by Konstantin Paustovsky
Okay, so the autumn was taken up with reading the three volumes of Paustovsky’s memoir (there are three more, but I don’t think they’ve been translated). The whole thing is called Story of a Life. Paustovsky was Marlene Dietrich’s idol. I bought this a while back, curious to read the experiences of this writer who survived the whole Soviet/Stalinist period (not many did). It’s as good as Marlene Dietrich said! His writing is incredible. There’s a Proustian element to it: he doesn’t describe his childhood. He imagines his way back into that time through sensory detail: nature, food, weather, music, the FEELING of it.

63. Light Years, by James Salter
I read this years and lives ago before I was ready for it. I read it maybe right after college. I was super young and way too young for this book about adults falling apart, quietly, ruthlessly. The emptiness of marriage, even with the trappings (house, yard, dog, kids). The way people come face to face with themselves and their failures. Life seen in a long view, taking place over decades. When you’re 22, you don’t look that far ahead. Or I sure didn’t. And Light Years provided a view I didn’t want. I was in a relationship. It was serious. I wasn’t happy. I resisted domesticity, I just didn’t fit into it, no matter how hard I tried. Light Years, in retrospect, gave me a vision of what life might look like if I continued on the path I was on. It made me shiver. I never read it since. I think of it with revulsion. (That being said, there were scenes I remembered vividly.) So I decided to gear up and re-read it. I’m able to see my life in decades now and it is unsettling – for different reasons, though. I didn’t submit to a life I didn’t want. I did not take the path of least resistance. I chose a hard way. It didn’t feel like a choice but … it would have been easy (in retrospect) to marry the boyfriend, and just … try to fit into that life. And it would have been a fucking disaster. My life was a disaster ANYway but at least it was mine. I wasn’t stifled by having to PRETEND. So yeah. I had a strong response to this book. James Salter is a gem of a writer. His sentences seem so simple. How does he do it?

64. The Unbearable Lightness of Being, by Milan Kundera
My Kundera phase began after I saw the movie adaptation (in a theatre in Philadelphia – I think? with the boyfriend). It made such a huge impression on me so I went out and read the book. Its mix of plot and politics helped clarify what I sensed in the book. I didn’t know much about the Prague Spring at the time. I learned about it from Kundera.

65. Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley
I re-read this every couple of years. It’s genius.

66. One Hundred Years of Solitude, by Gabriel Garcia Marquezc
Just admitting up front I’d never read it. So I read it. During the last chapter, I felt like I couldn’t breathe, mainly because the greatness of the book – its sheer stature – was hitting me like repeat waves. It was like the last four paragraphs of “The Dead” where you become aware – it’s undeniable – why everybody reveres it, why it has the reputation it does. My God.

67. Working-Class Hollywood: Silent Film and the Shaping of Class in America, by Steven J. Ross
Fascinating! Working on something and this is a classic text. Really illuminating on the silent era, the teens and 20s, and the portrayal of class issues and labor issues in early films. And why such issues largely disappeared from the American cinema landscape, and remain disappeared today.

68. Restless Youth, by Konstantin Paustovsky
Volume 2 of Paustovsky’s memoir. This volume details his high school and post-school years, the breakout of WWI, all the different jobs he had, the places he traveled, the dreams he harbored of maybe someday writing something. Again, his prose is unforgettable. Granted, I read it in translation, so I suppose I should say it’s a hell of a translation and gives a real sense of the poetry of the original.

69. Eileen, by Ottessa Moshfegh
I read in preparation for reviewing the movie for Ebert. It’s one hell of a first novel. Holy shit.

70. Inglorious, by Joanna Kavenna
A first novel I read years ago, when it was first published. It knocked my socks off. Like Elena Ferrante’s The Days of Abandonment, Inglorious is an insightful and accurate blow-by-blow portrait of a woman cracking under pressure. The novel was funnier on a re-read, maybe because I’m far away from my crack-ups. I still fear them, I have to be vigilant to avoid them, but I have better tools now to manage all of it. At the time of my first read, Inglorious was validating. It is so hard to put such an experience into words, and Kavenna did. From the inside. You can’t get away from the narrator’s warped panicked thinking. Crackups are amusing, but only in retrospect: the freakouts are so out-sized! You are flipping out over something so small. But … once it starts it can’t be stopped. Excellent book.

71. The Dawn of an Uncertain Age, by Konstantin Paustovsky
Here we go. Volume 3. Into the years of war and revolution and civil war. Just as Paustovsky evoked childhood with poignancy and detail, so he evokes the times of chaos. The wildness of the Bolshevik takeover, and the resistance to it, the Cossacks, the White Army, the total breakdown of society. He was in the thick of it. Unforgettable scenes and images. His travels through Russia, Ukraine, Crimea – the land of his childhood. Getting to Mariupol, a city name with horrifying resonance today. Separation from his mother and sister. Long train travels. Dodging bullets. Hiding. Complete pandemonium. In 2023 I read two other memoirs dealing with those years in Russia – by Marina Tsvetaeva and Nadezhda Mandelstam – and while the details differ, and each person faced their own challenges – the similarities are striking. Granted, both Tsvetaeva and Mandelstam were famous when the revolution broke out (or, at least, Nadezhda’s husband was famous and she was famous by association: she ran in a famous circle). Paustovsky was just a college-age kid, a 20something writing scraps of stories and poetry on pieces of paper, getting little jobs here and there in newspaper offices. Not famous at all. So his fate wasn’t the same as theirs. I do hope the final three volumes will make it into English translation. Paustovsky did run into trouble with censorship, and there were times when his books were suppressed but he survived. He lived. He made it through the Stalin years. Not many did. So I’d love to hear more about how he did what he did. This third volume is filled with the hope of what the Bolsheviks represented, an idea that far pre-dated them: the dignity of man (and woman), the hopes for equality, etc. Paustovsky was fired up. I’m not sure how he felt in the ensuing years as terror took over the land. I’d love to hear.

72. Sexuality in the Field of Vision, by Jacqueline Rose
I love Jacqueline Rose. Her Women in Dark Times has been very important to me. I read her Haunting of Sylvia Plath way back in college! So I decided to check out more of her work. I am going to keep it real and say: I could barely make heads or tails of this book. There were pages upon pages where I literally did not know what the fuck she was talking about. It’s written in academic-ese, and she’s steeped in Lacan/Foucault and … let’s just say I am not. That crowd use words differently. Words mean different things in their little belljar. Like “Signifier”. The way she used “signifier” made me think “Okay I thought I knew what ‘signify’ means but clearly they use it differently and I just don’t know what ANY of this means.” This is my fault, by the way, not hers. I just can’t grasp those concepts, I’m not trained enough. I didn’t “study English” at a college level (where this type of post-structuralist stuff was already in vogue). So I feel like if you’re in the academic world, you are versed in this language. Rose is an amazing writer – both Women in Dark Times and The Haunting of Sylvia Plath are totally easy to grasp (although the concepts sometimes aren’t.) A couple of times light broke through the clouds: I loved the chapter on Hamlet. I loved her observations on cinema. Her “brand” of feminism feels right to me. There are many brands. I don’t swallow any of it whole. Neither does she. She starts with Freud, and those chapters were just fascinating. Her views are against mainstream feminism’s rejection of Freud, and the general suspicion of psychotherapy – and she goes into why. These, to me, were grasp-able chapter. But then she goes into the “field of vision” stuff, and Lacan took over, and I completely and totally lost the plot.

73. The Nineties, by Chuck Klosterman
Siobhan gave me this for my birthday and I read it so fast I know I missed so much. I love Chuck Klosterman. Every single thing he wrote about in this book on the 1990s brought back so many memories. The third season of The Real World! Leonardo DiCaprio! AOL chat rooms. AIDS. Titanic. Ross Perot! The final years before the internet. Some people were on, but not everyone. I got my first email when I went to grad school. I was in my late 20s. We will be the last generation to bridge that gap. To have lived half of our lives in analog fashion before seguing over. Klosterman isn’t just writing a history. He’s writing history of a time he lived through. A fellow Gen X-er. He is interested in how things FELT at the time, not how people interpret it now. How things felt at the time is the REAL way to read history, to seek out sources, to ask those who lived through the times before what it was like. It was a hell of a decade. I started it in Philadelphia and ended it in New York, and in the years in between I lived in Los Angeles and Chicago, and lived off the grid – in my camper van – for months and months. And in the analog days, when you went off the grid you REALLY went off the grid. You could just be a person in your own little world. The wider world was there to engage in if you felt like it, but it was perfectly feasible to ignore it, if you wanted to. Now you can’t. We were a skeptical generation, some called us cynical. We “opted out”. At the same time, we were building this THING, this PORTAL, that would change the world forever, and in ways we still can’t understand. This book is indispensable social and cultural history.

74. Save the Last Dance for Satan, by Nick Tosches
Cashel gave this to me for Christmas. How did I not know of this? It started as an article for Vanity Fair, I believe. It’s a slim little book about 1950s rock and roll, disc jockeys, the Mob, and the payola scandals. This is a piece of real reportage. He tracked down a couple of the main players and interviewed them. These were Mob guys, racketeers, old guys hanging out at the Brill Building, working their schemes. Dirty business. Tosches uses words I don’t know and so I look them up and they’re labeled “archaic” or “obsolete”. lol only Tosches. Like “exundant”. He uses it twice in this book and it’s so beautiful. I want to use it now. Look for it.

75. On the Marble Cliffs, by Ernst Jünger
Published in 1939, often read as a metaphor for the rise of Hitler in Jünger’s native country. The truth is a little bit more complicated. Jünger was a conservative, a believer in an elite … so he wasn’t exactly against what was happening. But the terror and threat of 1939 is everywhere in his beautifully written and quite terrifying book about a fictional place, a peaceful place on the edge of the Marble Cliffs, where people lived in harmony, although fearful of the Head Forester, never seen, buried in the forest, sending his minions out to terrorize the peaceful.

76. Raise High the Roof Beam. Carpenters, by J.D. Salinger
Up there with my favorite Salinger story. It’s hilarious in that very Salinger way – the drum corps going by the car! – but also tender and sad. You know ahead of time the groom (Seymour Glass) would kill himself six years later. So the whole thing feels doomed. Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters is like a slightly madcap one-act by Chekhov.

77. Lighthousekeeping, by Jeanette Winterson
To be honest, I read The Passion to death. To shreds. Over and over. I don’t know if I can read it again! The others though … and there are so many … it’s fun to re-visit. Weirdly, I remembered nothing about this one except the lead character’s name (Silver), and the house built into a cliff on a diagonal so you have to haul yourself up to the kitchen hand over hand. Plus lighthouses. I guess I read it too fast back then? It was fresh and new to me, and fascinating – looping in Charles Darwin and Robert Louis Stevenson – with the sea/lighthouse connections – as well as Winterson’s typical romanticism and clarity. She’s just so damn GOOD. One of the most romantic writers writing today.

78. Down Below, by Leonora Carrington
What a harrowing memoir. In 1940, Leonora Carrington, a Surrealist painter, was living in France with her lover, Max Ernst, in an idyllic little villa, a way-station for every Surrealist in Europe (and America: Lee Miller visited!) Then Ernst was arrested by the Nazis and put into a concentration camp, and Leonora was forced to flee. She went mad. She was put into a mental institution in Madrid, where the treatment was so horrific it’s hard to even read about. Her parents wanted to transfer her to another asylum in South Africa – and so she was transported, basically a prisoner, to Lisbon, to catch the boat. In Lisbon, she escaped, literally running out of the back door of a cafe. She went immediately to the Mexican embassy and asked for a man she had met like a month earlier, who had told her he would be in Lisbon. He was there and the two of them got married. ! It was a marriage of convenience and survival. The two got onto a boat for America, and they finally ended up in Mexico. Down Below is the story of her going mad, of her time in the asylum – and it is told from within the madness. She believed she was the reincarnation of Queen Elizabeth, for example. She was convinced the world’s fortunes/misfortunes all resided in her – that she could control them. She suffered from hallucinations and paralysis. She was given shots of Cardiozal, which induced epileptic seizures, and was strapped to a bed, naked, for days on end. This is 1940 in Spain. Like, don’t you people have bigger things to worry about than tormenting a poor suffering woman? Carrington actually wrote down her experiences, but lost the manuscript when she left Europe for America. In 1943, she dictated the story to someone, it was translated into French, and published. The memoir is only 67 pages long, and is an excruciating read.

A good way to end the year, no?

2023 tally (I count by books, not author. If the same author appears multiple times, I count the author each time)
31 fiction
4 poetry
43 non-fiction
28 books by women
51 books by men
13 rereads

Previously
2022 books read
2021 books read
2020 books read
2019 books read
2018 books read
2017 books read
2016 books read
2015 books read
2014 books read
2013 books read
2012 books read
2011 books read
2010 books read
2009 books read
2008 books read
2007 books read
2006 books read
2005 books read

Posted in Books, James Joyce | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

2023 in Snapshots

  • I started 2023 in Memphis. The first photo I took in the new year is dated January 1, and it’s of the Graceland gates, circa 4:30, 5 in the morning. I was on my way to the airport and figured I’d just swing by. Nobody was around.

     

  • I have a regular day job – with a salary and benefits – for the first time since the economic collapse in 2008-9. I work remotely. I actually got a promotion, the first promotion of my life. The job has been a steadying factor and has made a lot of things possible.
  •  

  • I spent the winter/early spring immersed in Martin Scorsese, researching After Hours (and its surrounding context). This felt like a continuation of last year’s Scorsese-a-thon, when I was working on the Raging Bull essay. 2022 I got a handwritten thank-you note from Martin Scorsese. 2023 I talked with him on the phone for 45 minutes. Progress.
  •  

  • There’s been a lot of family time this year. Time with nieces and nephews. Everyday things, not just special visits. Going to lacrosse games and color guard competitions, and also just hanging out. There’s still a novelty aspect to it, because of Covid and 2020, a terrible year for our family, made worse by the separation. And my brother and Melody and the boys are here now too. I get to get to know my adorable nephews, which really wasn’t a possibility when they lived in los Angeles. They are the sweetest. When I pull up in the driveway to see them, they are often standing there, outside the door, waiting for me. Heartcrack.
  •  

  • I visited Chicago twice this year. Once in the spring, after going to Ebertfest with Mitchell, and once this fall, to see Mitchell in The Lehman Trilogy (it – and he – were phenomenal). I connected with friends, had brunch in Andersonville, hung out with Mitchell’s boyfriend Christopher, watched movies, walked along the lake shore, just where I used to take runs back in the day. There’s no place like home.
  •  

  • Spent as much time in New York as I did at home. I went down a couple weeks a month, staying with Allison, going to screenings, working in coffee shops, going to Bloomsday, going to a one-act festival in Bushwick, having brunch and dinner and drinks with all my people. Keith, Dan, Farran, Charlie, Ted
  •  

  • I have re-connected with Wade. Old-timers will remember: Wade! “Swann’s are beautiful and mean” Wade! “Dude, you need to be gentle!” Wade. After years of no contact (he’s not on social media), he reached out and we picked up again as though no time had passed. I welled up with tears at my first sight of him. He remains just as laconic and hilarious and smart as he was the first day I met him on the 1 train headed south from Columbus Circle. It’s easy with him. We’re just naturally in sync, and always have been.
  •  

  • Re-connected with Liz, too. College friend. Old old friend. The pandemic just solidified a lot of distance with people I already hadn’t seen in years. We had brunch at a place on the East side, and sat there for hours. And hours. And hours.
  •  

  • Spent a couple weekends with my Aunt Regina and her husband Garry, out in Queens and then also at their idyllic isolated place on Long Island: we took the ferry – and then Siobhan and the kids drove. It was perfect. Cousin time, sibling time, family time. I also stayed in Regina and Garry’s place in Queens during one of my New York stays.
  •  

  • A dream come true: or, a dream I didn’t even know I had, or allowed myself to dream: I presented Viva Las Vegas at the Paris Theater in New York. I introduced the film and felt so in my element, so un-nervous, un-stressed, it was like it was a natural extension of my everyday life. 35 mm print. So many friends showed up. Sheila, Liz, an old co-worker whom I’m friends with on Instagram, my old boss, Keith, Ian and Spencer, Stephanie Zacharek, Greg Santos, Charlie and Yvette … and then strangers too, Elvis fans, people just walking by and seeing it was showing. Elvis brings them in!
  •  

  • My car died. Basically disintegrating underneath me as I was driving. I had hoped it would last until the fall, because I had some big expenses coming up … but no. I had to buy a new car, like, now. With the help of my sister Jean, I found one. It’s “old” but it only has 50,000 miles on it. We call it a “grandmother car”. Some old lady probably owned it and used it only to drive to church and back, and to visit her grandkids who lived 3 miles away.
  •  

  • After two years of “squatting” in friends’ apartments, and compromising – mightily – in the apartment I found – out of desperation – I found a place to live. It’s almost too perfect. I live in the second floor of a little house – basically in the roof – my ceilings are slanted, there are little doors in the walls leading to the eaves, and dormer windows, etc. The house has a yard. And a porch. And it’s a 10-minute walk to the beach. I wake up in the morning and it’s so foggy I can barely see across the street. I never planned on moving back here. It was never in the cards and the fact that I am in New York for two weeks out of every month gives an idea of my ambivalence. But I had to move back here for family reasons and Covid changed everything. At least I live in a little house by the beach, battered on one side by wind and rain, wreathed in fog on the cold mornings. I even have a study, an actual study. Compensation. I’ve had my family over for visits, coffee, donuts, walks to the beach. I’ve never been able to do this before. My place is a work in progress – still – with scattered boxes and piles of stuff I still need to organize – but it’s mostly set up.
  •  

  • All this being said, I’m spending more than half of January in New York.
  •  

  • Tons of time spent with Allison. Staying at her place. Renting little places out of town, in the woods somewhere, and chilling out. She came up here for Thanksgiving, her third time, a new tradition.
  •  

  • Went to three plays put on by the local community theatre. I am now a subscriber. They do such good work. I am so impressed. Jean and I went to see their Merry Wives of Windsor, done outside on a hot summer night. The play is so stupid! The company really leaned into the madcab Three’s Company-episode-esque absurdity. Jean and I were dying. Then Lucy and I went to see two plays – The Book of Will, which Lucy loved so much she went to see it twice – and Much Ado About Nothing, which Lucy of course hadn’t seen. Lucy was afraid beforehand she wouldn’t understand it. I told her the whole plot to prepare her. And then, of course, she understood every word. And was laughing hysterically at some of the shenanigans. Again, so impressed with this company’s work.
  •  

  • Got new glasses, with big thick black frames, designed by Oliver Peoples (!), retro Buddy Holly style. I adore them.
  •  

  • Had a blast interviewing Peter Sarsgaard – !! – in a QA following a screening of his new movie, Memory for which he won the Volpi Cup for Best Actor in Venice. I have admired him for so long – I saw him in two plays back in my grad school days – Kingdom of Earth and Burn This – and my first encounter with him in a movie was seeing The Center of the World at the Angelika, way back in the day. Shattered Glass solidified my feeling that he’s one of the best actors working today – but in such an understated sneaky way. You don’t see “the work” at all. It was an honor meeting him! And talking with him in front of a packed house at the Jacob Burns Film Center. And I finally got to meet Todd, who’s been commenting on this site for basically 20 years. It was amazing! Bonus: my dear friend Jen came – we were roommates for nine years; in fact, we were roommates when I started this blog. and Siobhan came too. We all sat together in our reserved seats and … not gonna lie … it felt really good to have them there!
  •  

  • Just a month ago, in New York (of course), I went to a workshop reading of Alex’s show – a musical based on her life – ! called S/He and Me. Mitchell flew in for it, which was such a treat! I haven’t seen Alex, one of my dearest friends, since early March 2020 (think about it), when I went to go see her in Wicked on Broadway. Her contract had just started. Our time after the show was brief and glorious – but then the pandemic came and Wicked closed (I’m so glad I caught it before everything shut down) and I haven’t seen her – or her wife Chrisanne – another dear friend – since. This is the longest we’ve gone without seeing each other since we first met. So first of all, I am so proud of her for everything she’s accomplished in the last bunch of years, but selfishly I was also over the moon at seeing Chrisanne and Alex again. The day of the workshop also happened to be World AIDS day. The tiny audience – 20 people – all wore red ribbons. Alex has AIDS so it’s a huge part of her story – as is her survival, beating every odd on the planet – but it’s not just her story, it’s also the story of her generation, and ours. A generation of elders was wiped out. Afterwards, Mitchell and I went out for drinks, and raised a glass to all the friends we have lost. We felt so lucky and grateful and happy. The show was amazing and Mitchell and I – sitting in the front row (Alex, to us: “Really? Really?”) – were absolute wrecks for much of it. At one point, during the extraordinary song – sung by Alex – paying tribute to everyone who died of AIDS – I felt Chrisanne’s hand – reaching out from where she was sitting behind me – and I reached behind me to hold her hand, and Mitchell’s hand reached out to me too – so we listened, all gripping on each others’ hands for dear life. The score was amazing. The show will for sure be hitting New York, maybe next year, so it was an honor to be in that room – invitation only – part of a tiny group of loved ones.
  •  

  • Of course the books I read and the movies I saw make up an important part of every year, but I’ve written about them (or, at least the movies I saw) elsewhere.
  •  

  • Grateful for my life, although it’s still sparked with “divine dissatisfaction”, and a yearning to do more, accomplish more. It’s important to me – finally – to have balance, although I miss my exhilarating high-flung energy. It’s a trade-off I’m not completely reconciled to. But then I think of my nieces and nephews erupting into happy cheers when I come over for a visit – instantly begging me to sleep over – like it would be the most exciting event in the world – and I realize what I have gained by being able to be present to everything that is good. Present to it especially since 2023 is a 10-year anniversary for two life-changing events. Good to take stock and be aware of the magnitude.
  •  

  • Here’s the beach at the end of my street on a chilly still morning.
  •  

     

     
     
    Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. You could also subscribe to my Substack Sheila Variations 2.0.

    Posted in Personal | Tagged , , | 17 Comments

    2023 in review

    2023 is the ten-year anniversary of maybe the most significant year in my life. At any rate, what happened in 2013 is what made everything else at least possible.

    I wrote about this on my Substack– and provided some links to things I’ve written this year, here and elsewhere.

     
     
    Thank you so much for stopping by. If you like what I do, and if you feel inclined to support my work, here’s a link to my Venmo account. And I’ve launched a Substack, Sheila Variations 2.0, if you’d like to subscribe.

    Posted in Movies, Personal | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

    Review: All of Us Strangers (2023)

    I did my best with this one, I really did. Review on Ebert.

    Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 8 Comments

    Rogerebert.com: The Great Performances of 2023

    In our collective Great Performances feature on Ebert, each of the contributors wrote about a performance we considered one of the best of the year. I wrote about Rosy McEwen’s performance in Blue Jean

    (I included Blue Jean in my Top movies of the year list).

    Posted in Actors, Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

    Elvis’ dirty Christmas

    One of my favorite YouTube reactors – Jayy with two y’s – discovered Elvis about 3 years ago. 2020. Going in, she had no idea. She had only a couple of very vague preconceived notions, mainly that he danced around like a crazy man and lots of people didn’t seem to like him. That’s what she knew about him.

    Cut to: 5 months later: she’s visiting Graceland, live-vlogging the whole thing, and crying at his grave. lol. I mean, this is the power!

    Her gateway was “In the Ghetto” – the first Elvis song she listened to – and “If I Can Dream” – and since then she’s gone on and watched/listened to it all, dragging in family members to show THEM the clips she loves. She just gets it and she “got it” almost instantly. She didn’t have to research it for context. She just felt it. I love how much she has a crush on him.

    So here she is reacting to “Santa Claus is Back in Town”, one of the dirtiest sexiest bluesiest tracks in Elvis’ whole career. Even dirtier because it’s a song about Santa. As Tom Petty said, “‘Santa Claus is comin’ down your chimney tonight’ sounds absolutely filthy when Elvis sings it.” At one point, Jayy is cradling her Elvis doll, still in the box, and swaying to the music, declaring, “Lord Jesus, he better STOP.” lol The transformation!!

    Posted in Music | Tagged | 4 Comments

    November 2023 Viewing Diary

    After Everything (2018; d. Hannah Marks, Joey Power)
    In early November, I holed up in a cozy little house in Connecticut with Allison and Carol. I had to work the whole time, which was a bummer but the night was ours. We watched The Golden Bachelor, and then we somehow tripped over this one. We had been talking about The Bear, and so Jeremy Allen White caught our attention. This was pre-Bear, and it’s clearly a low-budget movie – the sound quality was sometimes iffy – but it was shot on location in New York City (sadly rare, these days). White and Maika Monroe star as a couple who meet randomly in a subway station, spark up a relationship immediately, which is then thrown into a different dimension by his cancer diagnosis. Not perfect, but in today’s corporate-inhuman world, I do appreciate a movie about an adult relationship, with complexities, and long conversations between two people. More, please.

    Wingwomen (2023; d. Mélanie Laurent)
    I wasn’t exactly surprised how much I loved this – I’ve loved every one of Mélanie Laurent’s films – but I wasn’t expecting the film to be so HUMAN, so RELATABLE, especially since it’s a big-budget international-heist movie, featuring car chases and assassinations and etc. The film has an almost ragged human energy, and the priority is the human relationships. This is no easy feat. So often films like this feature dialogue little better than sarcastic quips, and “snark”, and “banter”. Here, these women talk REAL to each other. I loved it. I reviewed for Ebert.

    Watcher (2022; d. Chloe Okuno)
    Watching After Everything, both Carol and Allison were struck by Maika Monroe. They weren’t familiar with her work, and they really loved her. She is very pretty, of course, but not in an outrageous way. She’s pretty in a very real-woman kind of way. She’s also a good listener. I filled them in on Maika Monroe’s career, and sang the praises of Watcher, which never gained much traction and I just can’t understand why. In the olden days, Watcher would have had a nice theatrical run, and gotten more attention, not from critics necessarily, but from the public. Monroe is SO good in it. The movie is SO good, and frustrating, and disturbing. So we watched it and had a great time. Good discussions too about listening to your gut, paying attention to red flags. The film has a lot in it. I really loved it. I reviewed Watcher for Ebert.

    The Golden Bachelor (2023)
    Watched with Allison and Carol. I haven’t been watching it, so they filled me in on all of the “contestants”, all of whom had nicknames: “Dancer Chick.” “Gnome.” The show is weird. I would never call myself old-fashioned, but … I think The Bachelorette works better than The Bachelor, where the woman has to vet all the men, and the men have to show their stuff. It’s like the natural world, lol, where males strut around in their plumage, and women pick. It just seems to work better. Don’t taze me, bro. There’s something really disturbing about women racing to tell a man they love them: and these contestants all say the same things: “I feel like I am falling in love with you.” “I am in love with you.” “I am not falling in love with you. I AM in love with you.” The words “I love you” take on almost a talismanic importance in The Bachelor universe, and it has nothing to do with how life is actually lived on the ground with real people. In the real world, racing to tell a man you love them first is in no way a deal-closer. As a matter of fact, he may run fleeing into the night. In what universe is a woman clamoring to tell a man she loves him the moment a man goes, “Well, YOU are clearly THE ONE.” No! It’s the opposite. It looks desperate! The Golden Bachelor would respond with comments like “That is so special”. Or “What a sentiment”. Or, the worst: “Awwwww.” lol We watched with a mixture of hilarity, mockery, and interest.

    July and Half of August (2016; d. Brandeaux Tourville)
    Somehow our discussion of The Golden Bachelor turned into a massive conversation about relationships. We all were sharing our experiences. I talked about the weird love triangle I was in in my late 20s. The love triangle had long-lasting consequences. I don’t think I even realized it at the time it was happening. This somehow morphed into Allison telling Carol about my short film, July and Half of August. Which was so sweet. It was Allison’s idea to show it to Carol. I had the Vimeo link and Allison worked her magic and projected it onto the huge television. It was so fascinating to hear Carol’s reaction, especially since she didn’t know the whole play, and only had the film to go on. I’m proud of it.

    Your Lucky Day (2023; d. Dan Brown)
    Another assignment where I was surprised how much I dug it, and how much I found in it. There was a lot to talk about. It’s a hostage-scenario-movie, a “thriller”, I suppose, but it’s actually much nastier than that, with a lot to say about How We Live Now. Big-corporation “message movies” could take a page out of Your Lucky Day. I reviewed for Ebert.

    Godland (2023; d. Hlynur Pálmason)
    A powerful uncompromising film about a priest who travels across the icy/lava wilderness of Iceland to build a church in the middle of nowhere. The cinematography is beyond compare: similar to The Revenant, there are some shots where I literally can’t figure out how they did what they did. They are clearly out in the middle of ice fields. It’s a very disturbing film about a man filled with convictions and good intentions, all of which are challenged when he has to deal with actual humans. The sense of place is awe-inspiring. The pacing is slow, stately even, but fraught with gigantic emotions. These actors are all really out in the elements. No fakery. Amazing film.

    Escaping Twin Flames (2023; d. Cecilia Peck)
    This is the second documentary I’ve watched about these grifter con-artist bozos. I think I’m done now.

    Anatomy of a Fall (2023; d. Justine Triet)
    Sandra Hüller is having quite a year, appearing in this and Zone of Interest, two totally different kinds of films and characters. I’m sure you’ve heard of this one: in many ways it reminds me a little of Force Majeure: there’s an accident or an unforeseen natural disaster, and people react in different ways: relationships topple, identities dissolve, certainty shattered. Here, Hüller plays a successful writer, living in a mountain retreat with her husband and son. One day, husband falls off the balcony and is killed. There’s something sketchy about the fall (according to police). Hüller is looked at and treated as a suspect. Since we- the audience – do not see the fall, we are kept in a state of suspended tension, wondering if she did it, could she have done it, IF she did it then WHY? This is a very long film. I’ve seen complaints. I definitely felt the length but I didn’t mind it. The sense of uncovering bits and pieces of the truth, and then the deeper truths of what is going on in that house, what the married relationship was like – its tensions and problems … all of that was fascinating. About 3/4s of the way through there’s a flashback to an argument between husband and wife. It is our first encounter with the husband when he is alive. This scene is explosive, unforgettable, the kind of partnership acting I yearn for in movies: the scene is long, it is jagged, it goes many places, it starts as a normal discussion and then escalates. These ACTORS. My GOD.

    The Killer (2023; d. David Fincher)
    A chilly funny “the sad life and times of an assassin” film, directed by the master of mood and detail. Michael Fassbender plays “the killer”, on a stakeout in Paris, monologuing to us in an almost bored voice about the job and what it requires. He holes up in an abandoned We Work office (just one of the many funny moments in the film), and does yoga, grabs McDonalds, watches, waits. He fucks up this job, badly, and has to go on the run. He’s hiding from those looking for him, but he’s also seeking out the ones who have put him in this position: each “chapter” of the film features another character. It’s a sparsely populated film. Each “chapter” has its standout scene, either an emotional standoff or physical (there’s a physical fight – in a dark house – that has to be seen to be believed). I loved the humor in this. It’s SERIOUS, but it’s not self-serious, a huge difference. My cousin Kerry O’Malley is the “star” of one of the chapters. She’s so good. A couple of my NYFCC colleagues have said to me they think she steals the whole thing, and I can’t disagree.

    Chile 76 (2023; d. Manuela Martelli)
    Aline Küppenheim plays Carmen, a pampered upper-class woman living in 1976 Chile, a hair-raising time to live in Chile, although Carmen’s economic status protects her somewhat. She’s got her summer house, and parties to plan, friends to visit. Meanwhile, though, all around her is a state of terror and a siege-mentality, as the mostly working-class members of society protest Pinochet’s dictatorship, and are “disappeared”, leaving no trace. Through her work at a nearby church, she is taken to see one of these protestors, a young man injured by a gunshot, who can’t be taken to a hospital because he’d surely vanish. She tends to him, and through this relationship she is drawn into the conflict, way outside her comfort zone, where checkpoints are terrifying places, where parking your car in a certain neighborhood is asking for trouble. Meanwhile, Carmen’s rich friends all say stuff like “Thank God law and order is being established” and “Nice to get back to normal after all that Socialism” (i.e. Salvador Allende’s time in office). It’s grotesque. A story like this perhaps needs a Costa-Gavras to really pull it off. This is the story of one individual privileged woman whose eyes are opened to what is really going on. It’s a start, but we need more. (A film like last year’s Argentina 1985 is an example of a film with more of a macro point of view. The story of an individual is, of course, important but the wider story is MORE important.)

    Priscilla (2023; d. Sofia Coppola)
    I was just talking with Mitchell about this in regards to Maestro. Like it or not, “great men” are different. It’s why they are “great”. This is not to excuse the behavior, but to acknowledge reality. People dislike this narrative now, and there’s a great societal levelling going on, and in most cases this is, I think, good and right. But when we’re talking about interpersonal stuff, it’s not so simple. We were talking about Bernstein’s wife and how she is presented in the biopic, eventually exhausted and disheartened by the claims on her husband that take up all his time: professional/personal/sexual. But … you’re not marrying Joe Schmoe. You’re marrying Leonard Bernstein. This doesn’t mean you have to put up with it, not at all, but you can’t really BLAME him for not being a nice middle-class husband. He’s not. You married a public man, a bisexual if you want to label it, maybe let’s just say a promiscuous man who slept with basically everybody, and a great artist. Like it or not, it’s going to be different married to a man like that. You can’t ask him to NOT be those things. There’s “bad husband” and then there’s “bad husband who is also Leonard Bernstein and/or Elvis Presley”. lol I felt Priscilla didn’t quite deal with this reality (in the way Baz Luhrmann’s film did, although Priscilla played, of course, a smaller role in BL’s film, albeit even more consequential in terms of her involvement in the overall Story). I love Sofia Coppola. She is rare, a poet of boredom. Films aren’t usually ABOUT boredom. Her films are mostly about women and girls waiting around in a state of bored and sometimes restless yearning (being bored AND restless is not a pleasant experience), hoping their life will soon start for real. Virgin Suicides, Lost in Translation, Marie Antoinette, The Bling Ring, The Beguiled all live in this amorphous space, of languishing boredom and WAITING. Somewhere is, I believe, her masterpiece. Somewhere is all about male waiting, and perhaps it’s her masterpiece since she had a little bit of distance from it. I don’t know. Priscilla is perfect material for this Poet of Boredom, and it is that which she captures beautifully. Sitting around, waiting, standing, watching him go away, clinging to the phone, lolling about painting her nails, everything vivid and yet somehow muted as well, gauzy and indistinct, just like the experiences of being a teenager in that totally unreal situation. Bad husbands are all the same, though … it’s the usual: he’s not there, he’s cheating, he leaves her out of things … but … but … it’s ELVIS. And so what does him being ELVIS add to this weird WEIRD experience? Jacob Elordi is way too tall (Elvis was tall, but not that tall), but he got Elvis’ leg jiggle and stutter AND big open laugh down to a T, and he didn’t condescend to Elvis. You felt he was sincere. The film incorporated things Baz Luhrmann left out, things I missed, like Elvis’ New Age stage, and Larry Geller the Guru, and Elvis reading all these incomprehensible books, driving everyone mad. I loved those sections! The issue I had was in the disconnect between Elvis the real guy and Elvis the Superstar. (I don’t want to blame the film for what it DIDN’T do, I want to be clear). It’s not that the disconnect wasn’t real: The disconnect was totally real and Priscilla was kept in a constant state of anxiety, waiting for him to calm down, come down to earth, come home, etc. Elvis himself had a hard time connecting his worlds, which makes sense. The gap between them was vast. But in the film, I never got the sense that the Bad Husband on display was also the Famous Supernova onstage. It didn’t connect. I never felt Jacob Elordi was capable of going out onstage and doing what Elvis did. This is a common problem with biopics: how do you make an audience believe that an actor is ALSO a well-known figure who can actually go out onstage and SLAY? In Coppola’s film we never saw Elvis performing. It was just this whole other world which Priscilla couldn’t enter. Okay, fine. But Elvis onstage was, arguably (although for me NOT “arguably”) way WAY more important (and interesting) than Elvis at home being distant (the only times I felt Luhrmann’s film lagged was in the section where he and Priscilla split. There, it became just any other biopic. Like I said: bad husbands and marriages aren’t unique. They all look the same.) Regardless: Elvis at home and Elvis onstage were solar systems apart. But a biopic has to connect those dots (which it did in Maestro.) Coppola doesn’t seem all that interested in Elvis as a person OR a performer, and of course that’s fine, but … when all you see are the trappings of fame (cars, wealth, etc.) and you don’t deal with the REALITY of the WEIRDO who was Elvis Presley, the man as performance Phenom, you’re missing the key part of the story. He wasn’t just any other guy. Yes, he was human, but come on, let’s be real. Priscilla’s story is fascinating – she wasn’t just any other teenager – and her waiting around at Graceland, going to high school … I mean, it is totally weird. Coppola captures that part of it: it is, ultimately, what interests her. The wandering anxious boredom of a teenage girl playing at being a grown-up. There’s a scene early on where Priscilla goes roller skating with Elvis and his yahoo pals, and it’s filmed with vivid energy, swirling in a swoony dreamworld of deep blues and pinks, the dizzying circular rink, the circling lights above, the disorienting exhilaration of being in love and being in the same place at the same time with this fabulous OTHER, the “other” being Elvis. It’s my favorite scene in the film. I also loved the scene where they took provocative Polaroids of each other, a scene which eventually “turns”, but before it does, they play, they laugh, they goof off, they are play-acting sexually for each other and the camera, and it’s beautifully intimate. Human. They’re on equal ground. Priscilla wrote about these moments in her book with affection – they’re good memories – and Coppola and her actors capture it.

    How to Blow Up a Pipeline (2023; d. Daniel Goldhaber)
    A fantastic eco-thriller: sticks to its guns, briefly sketches the different personalities involved, and how they all come together, but doesn’t really dwell on the personalities (except when it’s in connection to their part in the plot to blow up the pipeline). There’s the tag-along worried girlfriend. There’s the couple who show up together – one is clearly a dropout from the middle-class, the other a kid who grew up in foster care and on the street. There’s the college student whose mother has died. There’s the wordless indigenous kid, whose rage is so incandescent he literally can’t speak. There’s the “leader”, a guy who seems like he wouldn’t fit in at all with the rag-tag group of early 20somethings, an older guy, married, white, wearing trucker hats, etc., but in many ways his views are less abstract than theirs: the pipeline affects him personally. It’s running through his land. It’s ruining his life and the life of his family, in an immediate way. The energy is intense, the editing superb: multiple locations, characters, tasks, all happening simultaneously, and you never get lost in it. You understand the plan. You understand the breakdown of labor, who’s doing what. I love a film that focus on facts and practicalities: a film like, say, Le Cercle Rouge: the heist is the main event. The personalities are evident and important, but not central. We are seeing thieves, but we are mostly seeing competent thinking people, and I hunger for this in film. How to Blow Up a Pipeline is about people smart enough to plan far enough ahead to get shit done. I mean, look at the title. The film lives up to it.

    Sam Now (2023; d. Reed Harkness)
    Reed Harkness spent his childhood making movies with his brother Sam, stop-motion mad-cap stories, where young Sam throws his body around, fearless and open and free. Behind the scenes, though, a trauma has occurred. Sam’s mother (Mr. Harkness’ second wife) vanishes. One day she just left the family. And disappeared without a trace. Amazingly, the family never talked about it. Where did she go? Was she murdered? She didn’t seem unhappy. She’s seen in home videos laughing and part of the group dynamic. When Sam is a teenager, older brother Reed suggests they try to track down Sam’s mother. They work it like little Sherlock Holmes. They find her. They drive the length of California (filming the whole way) and show up at her door, camera rolling. This is just the beginning though, of a family story: the current interviews with everyone, many of whom appear to be speaking about it for the first time. Sadness and guilt pouring out years after the fact. Sam is now in his late 20s and just now starting to deal with what happened to him. For years he took a philosophical approach: well, she left, but now I get to see her, so it’s okay. A common trauma response. The film is an attempt to address the trauma, delve into it. It’s also a mystery story in a way, an interrogation into who Sam’s mother is. Nothing can excuse walking out on your child. And there’s a disturbing sense of narcissism in her character. She truly doesn’t seem to get what the big deal is. She wasn’t happy so she left. Sam Now is one of the best documentaries of the year, and it’s been an amazing year for documentaries.

    Blue Jean (2023; d. Georgia Oakley)
    This is on my Top 10. I heard buzz from when it played the various festivals, and I clocked it as a film I needed to remember to check out once it arrived in theatres/streaming. Blue Jean is Oakley’s first film as a writer and director (SO MANY AWESOME first films this year!), and you’d never know from the confident approach that she was just starting out. Blue Jean takes place in Thatcherite 1980s England, a bleak scary place if you were anything other than a rich white straight person. The Section 28 laws, forbidding the “promotion of homosexuality”, were passed in 1988 (laws identical to the “don’t say gay” nonsense happening now in the United States. In the fucking 21st century. It is a DISGRACE). Section 28 was the law of the land in England from 1988 to 2003. Oakley, after reading some articles and interviews with older lesbians, realized how much these laws – put into place the year she was born – affected her life. She lived in the reality of them, it affected her personally. So she decided to explore it in film. Rosy McEwan gives a phenomenal performance as Jean, the phys. ed teacher, “out” at home (although not happily: her family doesn’t really accept it), but closeted at work. Terrified she will be discovered, and fired. This was happening all around her. “Grooming” wasn’t in the parlance of late 80s England, but it was the same shit: we can’t have gay people teaching our precious children. Oakley’s decision to make Jean a gym teacher was deliberate: gay gym teachers ran even more risks, because they dealt with bodies, they saw teenagers in the gym showers, etc. etc. (There’s a great interview with Oakley in Slant about all the choices she made in establishing the context of Blue Jean). Jean enjoys her job, is a good teacher, maybe plays favorites a bit, and she’s not all THAT much older than her students: she’s on somewhat shaky ground. She lives alone, fearful of her snooping neighbors, especially when she has her girlfriend Viv (Kerrie Hayes) over. My God, I love Viv. Viv is out. Viv is openly butch. She lives her life. She loves Jean but she can’t bear the closeted torment Jean puts herself through. Oakley really captures the lesbian “scene” of the late 80s, the gay bar Jean goes to at night, the house where the community congregates, to party and hang out without fear of homophobia (or, hell, being arrested, faces splashed on the front page). Things go south. There’s a moment where Jean says the words, “I’m a lesbian”, and then has this huge response later, when she’s alone. Collapsing down, laughing and crying, in relief and terror. It’s one of my favorite acting moments of the year. I’m in tears just thinking about it.

    Sanctuary (2023; d. Zachary Wigon)
    What a hoot. Margaret Qualley (one of my favorites in the new batch of actors: head of the pack, as far as I’m concerned) and Christopher Abbott (love him) star in this two-hander, taking place solely in one location, a hotel room. It’s similar to the set-up of Good Luck to You, Leo Grande, except it isn’t, to put it mildly, a gentle feel-good romantic(ish) comedy. Instead, it’s a battle of wills. It’s incredible the emotional places these two actors traverse: dark twisty manipulative territory, not a common thing in today’s sanitized corporatized film landscape. Director Zachary Wigon also directed The Heart Machine (which I adored: check out my Substack piece on the film). John Gallagher Jr. and Kate Lyn Sheil star in another (almost) two-hander: an online relationship drives a man into literal madness, excruciating madness. It’s highly subjective filmmaking, very uncomfortable. Sanctuary feels like a play. It could be a play. From one moment to the next, you are never sure what either of these characters will do.

    May December (2023; d. Todd Haynes)
    I love Todd Haynes. May December is in my Top 10 of the year. I reviewed for Ebert.

    The Zone of Interest (2023; d. Jonathan Glazer)
    Sandra Hüller again, this time playing Hedwig Hoss, wife of Rudolf Hoss, commandant at Auschwitz. They live in a house right next to Auschwitz, a wall separating their garden from the camp. You can see the watch towers on the other side. The sound design alone should win an Oscar. Everything going on on the other side of the wall is present, but it is dimly heard: screams, shots, chugging engines, dogs barking … it’s just background noise. The Hoss family lives an idyllic life (if you can ignore the context: which you can’t, that’s the point), living in a stolen house, dressed in stolen clothes, eating on stolen china. The sheer casual-ness of everything is the true horror here. The film is a very difficult watch. The sun is always blinding, but the colors are somehow silvered, or greyed – a result maybe of the ash floating in the air, ash shoveled around in their garden beds, ash making it impossible to let laundry dry on the line. It’s horrific. My cousin Kerry went to a screening, and Hüller was there. Kerry told me that Hüller asked the costume designer to give her shoes a size too big. The shoes of a probably dead Jewish woman, once the lady of the house where Hedwig now lives. The clunky big shoes gives Hedwig a clumping peasant walk, an ugly walk: she is a grotesque character, but grotesque in her normalcy. Rudolf Hoss was an absolute monster. He wasn’t an Eichmann, huddled over train schedules (monstrous in and of itself). Hoss was ambitious for himself. He reached the pinnacle, overseeing the death of thousands of people. Christian Friedel’s Hoss is so undeveloped he’s practically an embryo. He looks like a homunculit, with an embarrassing disgusting haircut. (Look up a photo.) Kerry told me they filmed it in a house literally right next to Auschwitz, with a mostly Polish crew. This made the German actors feel very uncomfortable: Hüller was traumatized, she still has nightmares. You never see what’s going on in Auschwitz, although prisoners show up on occasion, and terrified trembling Jewish girls serve the Hosses tea. Hedwig at first may seem like an oblivious participant in a horror, she’s just married to a monster, she could conceivably claim innocence. But the film reveals the darker currents. Hedwig isn’t worse than her husband, but she’s just as bad. Maybe you could say she was worse. Hoss got the end he deserved. Not so much Hedwig, who ended up in America. We turned away boatloads of Jewish refugees during the war, and we let HER in. The De-Nazification process in Germany following the war … how could you de-Nazify Hedwig? You couldn’t. The rot goes all the way through.

    20 Days in Mariupol (2023; d. Mstyslav Chernov)
    In my opinion, there’s no other choice for Best Documentary. There are other good documentaries but as far as I am aware none of the film-makers literally risked their lives, running from gun-shots, staring at tanks rolling into the neighborhood, holed up in an emergency room, taking pictures that then went around the world. I just think degree of difficulty needs to be taken into account. The film is so harrowing it’s a very difficult watch, ripping your heart out of your body. It needs to be seen. A lot of people had very fucking weird reactions to the invasion of Ukraine: it’s like it didn’t fit into their ideological structure and so they focused on peripheral things, or ignored it altogether. Disgraceful.

    Passages (2023; d. Ira Sachs)
    I like Ira Sachs’ work. I loved Love is Strange. Passages got a lot of attention this year – it’s a great cast – the film racked up a number of awards internationally. I didn’t care for it. Every year there’s a film like this: the majority of people I know flip out for it, go mad for it … and I’m like, “….really?” I don’t even dislike, I’m just indifferent. It’s kind of a weird feeling. It makes you feel like maybe you’re not getting something, or you’re resisting something when … maybe you just don’t like it. I felt this way about Her (yuk). I felt this way about Hereditary. Like I said: there’s usually one a year. And this year it’s Passages. The fault is probably in me, I will grant you that, but I can’t pretend to like what I don’t like.

    A Thousand and One (2023; d. A.V. Rockwell)
    Another incredible first film. Teyana Taylor gives one of the best performances of the year as Inez, recently out of prison, back on the streets, living in a shelter in her old neighborhood, struggling to get her life on track. The film takes a turn when she basically kidnaps her son – now in a violent foster care home – out of a hospital. She gets away with it, by forging documents, changing names, moving to another neighborhood. This, of course, will eventually cause problems, and it does. She has to travel two hours to get to her job as a cleaning lady. She leaves him locked in the apartment, telling him to not answer the door. The film takes place over a 20-year period, and yet it never loses its eye for detail, the small things that make up life, the struggles, the moments of joy, the sense of how hard it is to have any time to even THINK about what kind of life you want. Three different actors play her son, and they’re all terrific.. I must shout out William Catlett, who plays Lucky, Inez’s long-time boyfriend, also recently out of prison. I fell so in love with his character, flawed though he is, and was incredibly moved by his character development. Everyone develops. By the end of the film, you are not just invested in these people’s lives. “Invested” implies distance. You love these characters. Teyana Taylor is mostly known for her music career. This is her first lead role. She is unbelievable. One of my favorite performances of the year.

    Return to Seoul (2023; d. Davy Chou)
    Park Ji-min plays Freddie, a French girl of Korean descent (adopted when she was a baby), who returns to Korea, on a whim almost, and finds herself attempting to locate her biological parents. Return to Seoul doesn’t go the way you perhaps think it will go, mainly because of Freddie’s character, a fascinating uneasy mix of aggression, rudeness, denial, conflict, provocative sexuality. She revels in making people uneasy. She can’t/won’t do small talk (she really can’t, because she relies on a translator). She’s French, she keeps insisting she’s French, not Korean. The Korean people she meets are taken aback, confused, upset, although they do their best to understand, make allowances. (Much of this reminded me of Daughter from Danang, a similar story although it’s Vietnam, not Korea. Daughter from Danang is one of the most painful upsetting documentaries I’ve ever seen. It’s like the film-makers themselves had no idea what would be unleashed by this American woman traveling to Vietnam to meet the parents who gave her up. They probably assumed it would be a tear-drenched heart-warming meeting. Yeah. No. It doesn’t go that way.) And neither does Return to Seoul. Although that’s just the beginning. There are two time-jumps, unexpected, since the first section takes up so much time. This will not be just one story. It will be multiple stories. Return to Seoul exists at an intersection of conflicting realities: belonging/not-belonging, expectation vs. reality, culture-clash, even more disorienting since Freddie is French, but is treated like she’s “come home at last” by the Koreans she meets. Where Freddie goes in her life journey is unexpected, to say the least. It’s interesting watching a film where the lead character is so unfriendly, whose behavior is so off-putting. Freddie is so closed off, so hard. It’s not just a protective facade, shielding her vulnerability. Nope. There’s something steely in her. It’s refreshing.

    Fallen Leaves (2023; d. Aki Kaurismäki)
    My #1 film of the year. I’ll be writing more about it so I’ll just leave it at that.

    Four Daughters (2023; d. Kaouther Ben Hania)
    Another harrowing documentary. It’s hard to explain. There’s a complicated premise. A Tunisian mother raises four daughters. There’s no dad in the picture. Life is very hard. Two of the daughters become radicalized in the upsurge of strident political Islam, sweeping through Tunisia and everywhere else. They don full burkhas. They lecture and scold. They are teenagers. Then one day, the two daughters disappear. They snuck away to join ISIS, to marry ISIS men. (These girls are famous. I saw a couple of news stories about them.) These girls – now women, now mothers with children – are still being held in a prison in Libya. Tunisia will not re-patriate them. They might as well be dead. Mother and two remaining daughters grieve the loss. But Four Daughters is not just this terrible story. Director Kaouther Ben Hania hires five actors to play the mother and daughters: they re-enact scenes told to us by the mom, by the remaining daughters. Sometimes the actual real people act in scenes as well, re-living their old arguments, or the games they used to play. It’s basically a group therapy session, theatre as therapy. (Honestly, I think it’s now the actors who are going to need some therapy.) A fascinating and troubling concept: boundaries have blurred, it feels dangerous: should any of this even be happening, should it be filmed? What is the use of putting these people through the trauma all over again. The cruelty is breath-taking. I have hopes for the two remaining daughters (I have little hope for the other two), but … how on earth can they even make sense of what has happened? Their mother basically re-traumatized them. It’s ugly. All of these women offer themselves up to the camera with transparency and vulnerability. It’s awful and beautiful.

    Eileen (2023; d. William Oldroyd)
    I loved this. It’s nasty, grubby, and anti-charming. I appreciate all of these things. I reviewed for Ebert.

    All Dirt Roads Taste of Salt (2023; d. Raven Jackson)
    Also in my Top 10. Also a first film for the writer-director. I’ll be writing about it.

    American Fiction (2023; d. Cord Jefferson)
    Allison and I watched this when she was staying with me for Thanksgiving. Another first film. Like … I know film is in a tough spot right now, and streaming is fucking everything up. But … somewhere, still, people are making provocative personal films, they’re still doing their thing, trying to make work that says something, means something. Jeffrey Wright has been doing excellent work, on stage/television/screen, for decades. It’s so much fun to watch him as the center of something, as opposed to a peripheral and treasured character-actor spot. American Fiction is satire (mostly), and it’s satire in the classical sense: It actually feels dangerous. It’s telling some dirty little secrets, and it’s presenting these dirty secrets in a funny way. So people laugh. But what if the wrong people laugh? What if people take it the wrong way? Well, this is the thing with satire. You can’t control the reaction, you can’t explain yourself, or try to make it OBVIOUS to the enemy what you are doing. You can’t say “Okay, you people over here are allowed to find this funny. You people over here are not allowed to laugh.” What surprised me, though, was the heartfelt family story (Sterling K. Brown!), and the romance between two ADULTS. So sadly rare. These people are grown. A romance is different when you are fully grown. So it’s a mix of satire and reality. The trailer makes it look like a comedy and it is often very VERY funny. But it also brought me to tears. I really loved it!

    Afire (2023; d. Christian Petzold)
    Also in my Top 10. I love Petzold’s work. Afire, on the surface, seems to be one thing. And in a way, I watched it as that one thing: a struggling writer trying to get his book done, keeps being distracted, etc. But days afterwards, I was still thinking about Afire, feeling like I might have missed the deeper meanings on first watch. It’s not about the lead character at all. Or, it is, but what’s important … is that forest fire. The haunted woods. The sound of unseen helicopters. The sense of encroaching destruction.

    The Boy and the Heron (2023; d. Hayao Miyazaki)
    I was going to show this to my nieces and nephews, who adore Miyazaki’s other films but … I think it might be too scary? Hell, I was a little scared! The heron freaked me out. It’s gorgeous though: elegiac, phantasmagorical, imaginative, somber.

    All of Us Strangers (2023; d. Andrew Haigh)
    I was reduced to an absolute sobbing wreck watching this. I watched it on my birthday which was not a good choice, although … I didn’t KNOW it was going to destroy me going in. It hit me totally unaware. I went in not knowing anything about it, except that it stars Andrew Scott and Paul Mescal, and both Claire Foy and Jamie Bell are also in it. I love all those people. Okay, fair enough. I settled in. And soon after I was dismayed – truly – to find tears streaming down my face. I had to pause a couple of times. I don’t cry all that much anymore. Maybe a function of having cried so much in my 30s? I don’t know. Maybe I just have a better attitude now? But the emotion pouring out of me was alarming and made me think that … maybe I’m just better at NOT dealing with things now? I don’t know the answers. All I can say is my heart exploded. It HURT. The catharsis was personal. I guess I needed to cry. I’ll be reviewing this one so I’ll stop here.

    Posted in Monthly Viewing Diary, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments