NYFCC: Special award for Jafar Panahi

This year, we at NYFCC gave out three special awards, one to Jake Perlin, curator, distributor and publisher in recognition of his indispensable contributions to film culture, one to dGenerate Films for its invaluable work bringing independent films to China, and finally, one to Jafar Panahi, for “dogged bravery as an artist, and for the humanity and beauty of a body of work created under the most oppressive circumstances”. I wrote the essay for our program on Jafar Panahi (the final page of the program: fitting. Not because of me, but because – imo – there is nothing more important going on in film right now than what is going on with Jafar Panahi, and, by extension, all Iranian artists).

So I thought I’d share my essay here.

NYFCC SPECIAL AWARD: JAFAR PANAHI

In his influential 1978 essay “The Power of the Powerless”, playwright and dissident Václav Havel wrote about what it meant to “live within the truth” while surrounded by a “culture of lies”. The system “works only as long as people are willing to live within the lie”. If a citizen of a tyrannical society decides one day to start living “within the truth” then: “He has upset the power structure by tearing apart what holds it together. He has demonstrated that living a lie is living a lie. He has broken through the exalted facade of the system and exposed the real, base foundations of power. He has said that the emperor is naked. And because the emperor is in fact naked, something extremely dangerous has happened: by his action, [he] has addressed the world. He has enabled everyone to peer behind the curtain. He has shown everyone that it is possible to live within the truth.”

This is the example Jafar Panahi has set. By living within the truth, he has paid an enormous price. Just like Havel, Panahi’s films travel the world, winning awards, while being banned in his native Iran. And yet Panahi has persevered, under unimaginable odds and oppression. He has insisted from the start that he makes “humanistic” films, not political ones. In a 2001 interview with Senses of Cinema, Panahi said, “A political person can only see black or white. But I intertwine the tones.” You can see this in The White Balloon (1995), The Mirror (1997), The Circle (2000), Crimson Gold (2003), and Offside (2006). Each one has political overtones, but the individual attempting to live within the truth of a society designed to drive them all mad is front and center.

Panahi was banned from making films in 2010. This did not stop him. He continued shooting in secret, and he has created a remarkable body of dissident work. In July 2022, Panahi was imprisoned again, and given a six-year sentence. A month or so later, Iranians rose up as one to protest the death of Mahsa Amini. The protests continue unabated. The mere existence of This Is Not a Film (2011), Closed Curtain (2013), Taxi (2015), Three Faces (2018), and this year’s No Bears could be seen as a kind of miracle, but they aren’t miracles at all. They are a result of Panahi’s dogged insistence that the emperor is naked, and his determination to show the world that it is possible to live within the truth, even when the world demands you buy – and live – the lie.

Posted in Directors, Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

NYFCC Awards re-cap

This week we had our NYFCC Awards Dinner in New York. You never know who’s going to show up as a presenter. David Byrne was there! Mary Harron! “Marty” on the video monitor talking about the aspect ratio of Tar. Seth Meyers! Jordan Peele! And then of course our winners: Todd Field, Keke Palmer (her speech! her passion for the craft of acting was just so inspiring). Cate Blanchett – she’s hilarious. S.S. Rajamouli. I was almost in tears. His speech was beautiful. Jerzy Skolimowski came complete with Godard anecdote that brought the house down. Ke Huy Quan! Nan freakin’ Goldin was there. Laura Poitras. Charlotte Wells. Todd Solondz. I took Cashel and Ian and Spencer, which has become a fun tradition now. Great hanging out with Keith and Dan, good food. It’s an awards show unlike others: there are no nominees. People come in it having already won. There’s no cameras. It’s a small-ish event, and not open to the public. The people there are the studios, the critics and their guests. So it’s energy is looser than other awards events. There’s no time limits on speeches. People talk for as long as they want to, and they’re always amazing speeches. It’s been two years since we’ve had a full event, due to the pandemic, so there was a relief in all being together, in getting to do this celebratory thing again.

I wrote the essay for our program on Jafar Panahi, one of our special awards. I’ll post the text in a separate post. Ramin Bahrani, whom I met at Ebertfest years ago, gave the speech on his behalf and it was incredible. Solemn days. Amazingly, Taraneh Alidoosti was released from prison the same day as the awards – which Bahrani mentioned. There was such a solemn feeling in that large room. Jafar Panahi should have been there to accept.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

December 2022 Viewing Diary

The Whale (2022; d. Darren Aronofsky)
I thought it was appalling, and not for the obvious reasons. His body is viewed as literally a movie monster, with all these horror-movie shots of his gigantic ankles, etc.) It felt tired and pointless. I hated it.

Donbass (2022; d. Sergei Loznitsa)
Donbass was made a couple years ago and arrived last year, perhaps making even more of an impression due to the worldwide response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. (One of many.) Donbass was filmed in the thick of all of it, with clearly real people, in real situations, but there are “vignettes” set up – a grotesque wedding, a makeshift community living in a shelter, confrontations between Russian soldiers and journalists, an “official” visiting a maternity ward and lecturing the staff (absurd). Loznitsa is an important filmmaker. Donbass is haunting.

Bandit (2022; d. Allan Ungar)
Allison saw a trailer for this and it looked good to her, so we watched it. It IS good. I love a good heist movie, but it’s especially fun because of Josh Duhamel’s performance. I wish this had gotten more chatter. It’s really good.

The Fabelmans (2022; d. Steven Spielberg)
Have seen it twice so far, once in the theatre with Allison. I love it. I love its sprawl and collage-like “mess”, I love how it includes everything. Nothing is irrelevant. It’s not a single-minded story with a single-minded focus.

The Murdochs: Empire of Influence (2022; d. No director listed in IMDB. WTF.)
Allison and I watched this. I hate these people.

Retrograde (2022; d. Matthew Heineman)
A quietly upsetting and mournful National Geographic documentary about the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. I reviewed for Ebert.

Jackass Forever (2022; d. Jeff Tremaine)
It was in my Top 10. The Jackass trilogy legit helped me get through those first months of quarantine in 2020, where everything stopped, everything got quiet, and things got a bit spooky, shall we say. And now, two years later, is Jackass Forever, with some new blood, but also the old gang. I find these movies so pure, in such an intriguing way. I posted my brother’s great essay on the movies. It’s one of my favorite pieces of writing about Jackass.

Deep Water (2022; d. Adrian Lyne)
This was excellent! Based on a Patricia Highsmith book I have not read! It’s a good old-fashioned erotic thriller, the kind that’s not made anymore, and who better for the job than Adrian Lyne?

Corsage (2022; d. Marie Kreutzer)
Also in my Top 10. It’s out now. Do not miss it.

Kimi (2022; d. Steven Soderbergh)
A strong contender for my Top 10 … but, you know, you have to make tough choices. Still. This is a fantastic film, it plays like a bat out of hell, it’s so RELEVANT – without wearing its relevance on its sleeve – and it’s also emotional and touching. Plus character development. Plus very very tense and thrilling. It’s great.

Reboot – first 3 episodes (2022; d. Steven Levitan, Carrie Brownstein, Jaffar Mahmood)
Allison made me watch this series. I always watch what she recommends. We watched together and it was hilarious fun.

Nanny (2022; d. Nikyatu Jusu)
Also in my Movies I Loved This Year list. I don’t say this often but there really isn’t anything else quite like Nanny. Very impressive.

Babylon (2022; d. Damien Chazelle)
In general, I guess I don’t like Chazelle. I like all the actors, but … it felt like this was a story about decadence directed by a man who’s never indulged in decadence in his life. lol

Benediction (2022; d. Terrence Davies)
In my Top 10. The story of poet Siegfried Sassoon, and his experiences during WWI and after: his relationship with Wilfred Owen, Stephen Tennant … and then the long long aftermath, told with Davies’ resonance, sensitivity, and control. So much control, so much uncontrollable feeling. Gorgeous. It makes me angry about the generations and generations of people who were forced to live in the closet, thereby consigning themselves to lives of misery (and not just themselves, but their spouses, too).

RRR (2022; d. S.S. Rajamouli)
A spectacle. A phenomenon. A word-of-mouth phenomenon. We at the NYFCC voted Rajamouli Best Director – well-deserved but also, it can’t be denied, symbolic. The Indian film industry is one of the most powerful in the world, with blockbuster hits, massive fanbases, huge numbers … and they normally do not make a splash over here, definitely not to the degree RRR has. Along with maybe Top Gun and ElvisRRR HAD to be seen in a theatre. People were actually flocking to movie theatres to see this thing. For whatever reason, RRR broke through into a mainstream world, and it’s been thrilling to watch. If you haven’t seen it … you really must. I am sure it will come back to theatres, particularly if it gets any Oscar nods. RRR has it all. And more.

Moonage Daydream (2022; d. Brett Morgen)
In my Top 10.

Daisies (1976; d. Věra Chytilová)
This groundbreaking experimental film from Czechoslovakia was streaming on the Criterion Channel. It might still be. Very controversial in its time for its portrayal of two hedonistic girls, determined to live lives of freedom, playfulness, appetite, silliness, where rules are meant to be broken. Chytilová uses a mashup of styles – black-and-white, color, sped-up film, long sequences unfolding like a silent film, jump-cuts … pouring every “trick” into the same cauldron, creating a collage of impressionistic mashed-together images (there’s not an uninteresting shot in the whole movie). Daisies still feels new.

Dinner in America (2022; d. Adam Rehmeier)
In my Top 10. I banged the drum hard for this one. I reviewed it for Ebert. Then I wrote about it again. I’ve seen it 4 times now. It’s going to be one of THOSE movies. I felt a little bit alone in my praise of it. And so I was so gratified when John Waters came out with annual Top 10 movies – and Dinner in America was on it! Yup. Well-deserved.

Ghislaine Maxwell: Filthy Rich (2022; d. Maiken Baird, Lisa Bryant)
Sorry. Can’t get enough of this fucking bitch.

Midnight (1939; d. Mitchell Leisen)
Delightful screwball starring Don Ameche, Claudette Colbert and John Barrymore. Hysterical. There’s a moment that made me laugh so hard (see gif) I had to stop the film and rewind 10 times.

Moneyball (2011; d. Bennett Miller)
I love this one. I reviewed when it first came out and I’ve since seen it maybe 9 or 10 times. I find it soothing. It’s such recent history but as a Red Sox fan I feel intimately involved, particularly with that small time-span – early 2000s baseball. It’s IN me, that history, and the film captures the everything-up-for-grabs feeling of those years. The agony, the ecstasy, etc. I also think it’s beautifully shot. The score is amazing as well.

La Cérémonie (1995; d. Claude Chabrol)
My favorite Chabrol. Terrifying. Absolutely terrifying – in such a quiet unnerving unspoken way. I wrote a little bit about it.

The Comfort of Strangers (1990; d, Paul Schrader)
I saw this in the theatre in 1990, with my boyfriend at the time. A million lives ago. We loved it. We loved the cinematography, the locations, the mood. Christopher Walken is so good and creepy. Helen Mirren is even creepier.

Punch-Drunk Love (2002; d. Paul Thomas Anderson)
I find this movie almost unbearably painful. Like Seal says, it’s the loneliness that’s the killer.

Sisters (1972; d. Brian De Palma)
What a ride. Great film.

Orgasm Inc: The Story of OneTaste (2022; d. Liz Canner)
This is so messed up. And that leader is a con-woman grifter of the highest order. Seriously: she is GOOD. But look closely: there are pinwheels spinning in her eyes. She’s a lunatic. But … has a crime occurred? In a way, yes: some people felt coerced and controlled. But … it’s a grey area. You sign up for an open-up-your-sexuality-with-a-group-of-strangers workshop and you are taking a risk. But the WAY this group manifested is just crazy. People emerge from this group totally twisted and damaged. The real story is how this woman “snowed” the media and Silicon Valley. And also, how “female empowerment” is used as a front for all kinds of horrors. See: NXIUM. I’ll empower myself on my own, thankyouverymuch.

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005; d. Shane Black)
If you know, you know. People who love this movie (like I do) love it passionately.

Catching Killers Two episodes: BTK and Happy Face Killer (2022)
When you’re stressed out and busy, it’s always relaxing to settle in with some murder investigations.

Turn Every Page: The Adventures of Robert Caro and Robert Gottlieb (2022; d. Lizzie Gottlieb)
I reviewed for Ebert. Fascinating. Maybe especially for writers – with our various experiences with editors – in a way, Turn Every Page is a portrait of a vanished world. A 50-year relationship with an editor!

Christmas, Again (2015; d. Charles Poekel)
I reviewed for Ebert and it quickly became a beloved movie. I watch it every year at Christmastime. It feels something in me, the wound of loneliness, of melancholy, of bittersweet-ness, all of the emotional ambiguities of the “holiday season” which can come into play if you’re lonely. Wonderful film, gorgeous to look at. I wrote more about Kentucker Audley here.

Scrooge: A Christmas Carol (2022; d. Stephen Donnelly)
Watched this with the kids. It’s really good! Luke Evans can sing, man.

Spotlight (2015; d. Tom McCarthy)
I reviewed for Ebert. It may seem weird that a movie about this horrible scandal would be something I’d want to re-visit, but I do. This is a relevant subject that impacted so many people over generations: and the movie cares enough to tell that story. It’s also an inspiring film about the power of the press, and the necessity of a free press.

The Lives of Others (2006; d. Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck)
Watched this in Memphis while I was sick. I saw it in the theatre back in the day and hadn’t seen it since. It’s so intense.

The Miracle at Morgan’s Creek (1944; d. Preston Sturges)
This movie is wild. Jesus. It’s kind of amazing it “passed” the censors at all. A woman gets wasted, and wakes up married. She has no idea who she married. Meanwhile, mystery husband has shipped out to war. To complicate matters, she used a fake name when she got married. A fake name she also can’t remember. So she can’t look up the records. The marriage was secret. Her dad doesn’t know. As far as her dad knows, and the whole town knows, she’s a single young woman. Then: a month later, it’s confirmed: she’s pregnant !!! Hijinx ensue. Great film. Wild.

Little Fish (2021; d. Chad Hartigan )
Watched this in Memphis. Not sure how I missed it. Not sure when this was filmed, but it’s about a worldwide pandemic – not a flu – but a neurological disease where people’s memories are wiped clean. First short-term, then long-term. There’s no cure. A young couple – Jack O’Connell and Olivia Cooke – face this challenge. This seems low-budget (ish) but they did a lot with the money they had. The sense of a worldwide panic – helicopters, tanks, protests outside medical centers, experimental treatments … and then the private griefs of those who suffer. I loved it.

Posted in Monthly Viewing Diary, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

2022 Books Read

Some re-reads this year, but a lot of new-to-me authors as well. New novels written by faves. Been a year of upheaval and transitions. I’ve managed to keep up my regular reading schedule. I just don’t feel right if I’m not reading something. For fun, for education, for escape, for whatever. It was a good reading year.

1. A Journal of the Plague Year: Being Observations or Memorials of the Most Remarkable Occurences, as Well Public as Private, Which Happened in London During the Last Great Visitation in 1665, by Daniel Defoe
I had never read this! I figured, all things considered, it was about time. It did not disappoint.

2. The Black Dahlia Files: The Mob, the Mogul, and the Murder That Transfixed Los Angeles, by Don Wolfe
I had this sitting around for years. I’ve read many of the books pertaining to this case, the Hodel book, the Ellroy book, etc. I think Wolfe makes the most convincing case (backed up by the newly opened LAPD files). This poor woman. She was just trying to survive but she was “hanging out” with not just unsavory people, but bad bad people.

3. Camera Man: Buster Keaton, the Dawn of Cinema, and the Invention of the Twentieth Century, by Dana Stevens
One of my favorite reads of the year, made even more special since it’s written by a friend and colleague of mine, fellow NYFCC member Dana Stevens. It’s not your run-of-the-mill door-stop biography. I interviewed Dana about it for Ebert.

4. A Place of Greater Safety, by Hilary Mantel
A daunting novel about the French revolution, as seen through the eyes of three of its main figures – Danton, Robespierre, and Desmoulins. I read it some years ago, post Wolf Hall, and had always wanted to return to it. I know the story behind this book. It was basically deemed unpublishable. It’s a 900-page dense detailed book about the French Revolution. Who cares. Well, to quote Ally Sheedy in The Breakfast Club: “I care.” Suddenly Mantel’s star rises, and suddenly this massive TOME about POWER and how power operates – and how power changes people (or doesn’t) – doesn’t seem so unpublishable after all. I honestly think in a lot of ways it’s superior to Wolf Hall. At any rate, I love Mantel (RIP), and this was a super fun re-read. It takes forever though. It’s huge. There are 800 characters. I mean, they’re famous – Marat, etc. – so that helps, but … I actually created an index for all the names. It helped. Some character disappears for 400 pages, then suddenly re-appears, and I’d have no way to quickly check and figure out “wait, who is this again?”

5. A Gentleman in Moscow, by Amor Towles
As good as everyone says. I am overwhelmed. The final chapter UNDID me.

6. The Camera Lies: Acting for Hitchcock, by Dan Callahan
My friend Dan’s book came out last year, and it was in storage, unfortunately, I couldn’t get to it. Finally I got my own place, and I eagerly jumped into it. For any fans of Hitchcock, this is an essential addition to the library. As always, Dan makes you want to pop in each movie and re-watch as you go along, so you can pick up on all the things he points out. Proud of my friend.

7. Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man (Books That Changed the World), by Christopher Hitchens
I’ve read this thing like 5 times.

8. The Uncollected Essays of Elizabeth Hardwick
She’s new to me – or at least, her writing is – and I am so glad I have made her acquaintance now. I inhaled it, so I probably need to go back and re-read at a slower pace.

9. By Grand Central Station I Sat Down and Wept, by Elizabeth Smart
This is an astonishing book.

10. The Assumption of the Rogues & Rascals, by Elizabeth Smart
A sort of loose sequel to the above. It’s unfashionable now to be “undone” by love like this, to cry over a man, to want love, even. All that girl-boss bullshit. I mean, good for you if it works for you, but for those of us who have been lovelorn, who have loved, lost, been totally undone – women who love too much? Yeah, okay, whatever, if you need a label – then Elizabeth’s Smarts words are haunting, piercingly true, and … upsetting. I have no distance. She doesn’t allow it.

11. Walled Gardens: Scenes from an Anglo-Irish Childhood, by Annabell Davis-Goff
My father gave me this book years ago and I am very regretful I am only reading it now. I don’t understand myself. Wouldn’t it have been nice to talk with him about it? Annabell Davis-Goff (who eventually married Mike Nichols – for a time) wrote a gorgeous and detailed memoir about growing up steeped in Anglo-Irish gentility and tradition, but almost like growing up in a forgotten world, a world passing them by. It’s beautiful.

12. Psychoanalysis: The Impossible Profession, by Janet Malcolm
I hadn’t read Malcolm’s two books in re: psychoanalysis and have always wanted to rectify that. Malcolm is relentless. People who agreed to be interviewed by her should have their heads examined. Pun intended.

13. Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays, by William Hazlitt
I’d been wanting to read this for a while – it’s quoted all the time – but Hazlitt’s stuff is not as widely available as it should be. You can read his collected essays (which I also did this year), but I was forced to buy a janky copy of this one, featuring a nondescript cover of a stock photo sunrise, and riddled with typos. No matter. Hazlitt can be a bit of a gushing fanboy – so there’s a lot of “even if this plot hole is a flaw, Shakespeare MEANT it to be a flaw to show the FLAWED nature of humankind” etc. But he’s such a marvelous writer, so fun to read, so much to think about.

14. Robert De Niro (Anatomy of an Actor), by Glenn Kenny
I read this back when it first came out. Glenn is a friend. It’s so fantastic. I re-read it in preparation for my video-essay for the Raging Bull release. I especially appreciate Glenn’s featuring of De Niro’s incredible performance in Stone, which deserves to stand alongside his greatest performances.

15. Tulipomania : The Story of the World’s Most Coveted Flower & the Extraordinary Passions It Aroused, by Mike Dash
I read this when it first came out and decided on a whim to re-read. I do enjoy speculative bubbles, in the same way I enjoy reading about brainwashing, culty groupthink, and propaganda. It’s all related.

16. Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story, by Julie K. Brown
Julie K. Brown is a hero. This book is such a grotesque read, it’s so infuriating and vile. I’ll just put my cards on the table: The only way this makes sense to me is if Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset, working for one, maybe two, maybe even three governments. No one on Wall Street ever traded with the guy. Every time I see him described as “financier” – and that’s all he’s described as – everyone calls him that – NY Times, WaPo, everyone – it’s so irritating. Language matters. He wasn’t a financier. Financiers DO FINANCE. Epstein didn’t. If he WAS an intelligence asset, then I think CLEARLY something went wrong in the vetting process (although assets are often cultivated from unsavory types with unsavory appetites). The only currency for Jeffrey Epstein was blackmail. This all sounds so conspiracy-theory-ish but honestly it makes way more sense than the “financier gone wild” story.

17. This Time for Me: A Memoir, by Alexandra Billings
So damn proud of my friend. Proud to be her friend, and just proud of her in general.

18. Sonata for Jukebox: Pop Music, Memory, and the Imagined Life, by Geoffrey O’Brien
One of the reads of the year. I am a little ashamed I hadn’t read this before. The book really does read like a sonata and like a jukebox: the childhood sections are particularly fascinating, because O’Brien manages to capture what it was like to be a child and music is just in the air, seeping into you from all sides, and you are absorbing everything, without any context, because you are a child, and instead of adding context after the fact, he immerses you in the language of what it feels like to be in that open pure state. It’s hard to explain, but it made me think about my own relationship to music – which I’ve written about a lot here – and the records in my parents’ album collection, and how they were my entryways into the world of music. This obviously isn’t the case anymore: kids are able to find their own music on their own. But we listened to what my parents listened to and it’s still amazing to me the connections I was trying to make – as an 8 year old, 9 year old – the connections I felt opening up between me and, say, the Clancy Brothers, or Ian & Sylvia, or the Beatles – how I was making sense of things, without any context. All I had was the sound. O’Brien is a master. The Beach Boys chapter alone is worth the price of admission. But the chapter about what it felt like when the Beatles appeared – as if from out of nowhere – gives me goosebumps just thinking about it.

19. Let Me Tell You What I Mean, by Joan Didion
Bittersweet to read some new-to-me pieces by her. I am hoping there will be more to come. All of her New York Review of Books pieces, for example.

20. Unruly Times: Wordsworth And Coleridge In Their Time, by A.S. Byatt
Byatt’s first book! It came out in 1970, I think, and – again, I think – was basically her dissertation in book form. For whatever reason, and not by design, this year I read a bunch of books by and about people formed by the French Revolution – or at least seriously altered by it – as everyone was, I suppose. Hazlitt, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Burke – plus Mantel’s novel. Oh, and Thomas Paine, too!

21. At Large and At Small: Familiar Essays, by Anne Fadiman
A re-read. She’s very calming. Her subject matter is, on the face of it, banal: coffee. Ice cream. Butterflies. She starts with the personal, i.e. “the familiar” – I love coffee. I love ice cream. I collected butterflies as a kid. But she veers off very quickly from the personal into the historical/cultural/social history of the given subject matter. So she ropes in the historical connection between coffee and writing (would Balzac’s output have been the same if he hadn’t drank coffee 24/7?), or Nabokov’s obsession with butterflies … Olivia Laing does a similar thing in her writing (she is currently working on a book on gardening. I can’t wait. I don’t care about gardening. But I can’t wait for her to make me care about it.)

22. Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader, by Anne Fadiman
A re-read. My dad gave this book to all of us one Christmas and it quickly became a favorite. It’s a special book for me, as are all the books dad gave me.

23. L.A. Woman, by Eve Babitz
Oh, Eve. I love you so.

24. The Big Green Tent, by Ludmila Ulitskaya
My friend Ted gave this to me a couple years ago – hell, maybe even 5 years ago – but it’s so massive I had to wait to be ready to tackle it. I mentioned to him that I wanted to read some contemporary Russian authors, an unknown landscape to me, and he gave me this book. It is massive, but it reads like a bat out of hell. It’s the story of three friends – together and apart – and their experiences growing up in Cold War Russia (the book starts with the death of Stalin). Amazing characters, intense atmosphere.

25. Selected Writings, by William Hazlitt
I’d only read his most famous essays – some which I reference all the time (in my head, but sometimes in my writing, too) – The Fight, The Indian Jugglers, The Pleasure of Hating – all essential reading. Important. He was an interesting guy, a friend of Wordsworth and Coleridge – and Charles Lamb – and a masterful writer himself. I’ll be revisiting this one. It took me half the year to get through it.

26. In the Freud Archives, by Janet Malcolm
Again with the relentless Malcolm. What a fascinating story, though. All those Freudians warring with each other, all these sketchy characters. It reminds me a lot of the Actors Studio, and the huge battle following Strasberg’s death in regards to his estate. It would have been a good subject for Malcolm.

27. Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, by Anita Loos
Hilarious.

28. Hitler: Downfall: 1939-1945, by Volker Ullrich
I finished the first massive volume last year, and had to take some time off before tackling the second volume. Hitler is such a bore. And he got even more boring as he approached his phantasmagorical and entirely fitting end. Complete la-la land in that inner circle. Ullrich has done a masterful job at painting the picture of those final days in the bunker – it’s amazing how many of those people actually lived to tell the tale. Not sorry to finish this one, but it’s an admirable work.

29. The Mars Room, by Rachel Kushner
Her The Flamethrowers impressed me so much I’ve almost been hesitant to read more. She is so fucking good. I was upset to see her name on the petition protesting PEN awarding the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists. So I was “off” her for a while. A meaningless protest on my part, perhaps, and one that didn’t last, but we each have to follow our own conscience in these matters. You wouldn’t know that from the bullies out there who demand “purity” and consistency from everyone – but I don’t listen to people who demand purity. People who demand purity have been responsible for some of the most heinous crimes against humanity in the annals of history. And a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. So, no thanks. I have no way of verifying if Kushner’s portrayal of prison life in Mars Room is accurate, but it feels well-researched and lived-in – just as her portrayal of 1970s Italy feels well-researched and lived-in in The Flamethrowers.

30. The View From Penthouse B, by Elinor Lipman
One of my favorite contemporary authors. I love that there is a new Elinor Lipman book, on average, a book a year. So much to look forward to.

31. Mortality, by Christopher Hitchens
Upsetting.

32. Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!: The Story of Pop Music from Bill Haley to Beyoncé, by Bob Stanley
I read this way too fast. I inhaled it in almost one single read – and it’s a long book – during my family’s vacation last summer. I’ll go back to it often. It’s incredible.

33. Tune In: The Beatles: All These Years, by Mark Lewisohn
THE read of the year for me, and I realize I’m basically a decade behind the times. This is only part 1! Part 2 is to come. It’s not here yet. Is it done yet? When is it coming? I NEED IT NOW.

34. The Road from Coorain, by Jill Ker Conway
Another memoir my dad gave me, this time from Jill Ker Conway, who grew up on an isolated desert farm in Australia – before moving to Sydney with her mother in around middle school – and eventually went on to be the President of Smith College (the first woman in that role). This is really a coming-of-age tale, and her memories of this farm – the brutal isolation, the hardships, but also the comfort – she grew up in almost complete isolation, schooled at home, only seeing her parents and the hired hands. Her book is all an act of memory. I can see why Dad gave it to me.

35. Divorcing, by Susan Taubes
WOW. A devastating book, a roman a clef, about the breakup of a marriage – obviously based on Taubin’s own. I’ve made a lot of new “friends” this year – meaning, writers I discovered – I pair Divorcing in my head with Elizabeth Smart’s heartbreaking By Grand Central Station I Sat Down and Wept, although the styles are very different. In both, women who have been flayed raw by their emotions, their love, their misery … and the writer pushes the form of writing hard into very experimental impressionistic territory.

36. The Master and Margarita, by Mikhail Bulgakov
This is my second time through. I had been itching to re-read it, and almost picked it up last year. I forgot how hilarious this surreal book is. Like, the cat is truly awful, but the cat is also high vaudeville, lolling about drinking champagne, jumping onto a streetcar. Also, the scene where everyone in the writers’ collective has been put under a spell where they MUST sing. They don’t WANT to sing, and they try to stop themselves, but they open their mouths and begin shrieking an aria. I was dying. It’s a testament to Bulgakov’s courage that this book even EXISTS. It was burned. He burned the manuscript. The whole book is about a banned book … “Manuscripts don’t burn” – the most famous line.

37. Conversations with Friends, by Sally Rooney
Her writing is fascinating because there is almost no subtext. You get what people say and what they do. It’s up to us to fill in the feelings. This is a slight exaggeration but not by much. Because you only get what people say and do, you are forced to meet them as if for the first time, the way you would someone at a party. You form impressions, you make assumptions, you get things wrong.

38. Midnight in the Century, by Victor Serge
Serge’s novel about being sent into exile in Siberia (based on his own experiences). The title alone brings a shiver of dread.

39. Arguably, by Christopher Hitchens
People have gotten irritated that I still read him – I mean, not constantly, lol, but there have been times when I’ve mentioned him and/or quoted him, and people bristle. The words “get some real problems other than what some random woman is reading” come to mind. He got a lot of things wrong – a lot of BIG things – but I like a lot of authors who got things wrong. If you read authors who were writing in the 20s and 30s, then you are reading people who got things wrong. Guaran-damn-tee. People were switching sides, backing the wrong horse – which seemed like the right horse at the time – it was complete chaos and very hard to keep your bearings. The ones who got things right – Victor Serge, for example – or, later, Orwell – are rarities. I’m probably “getting things wrong” in my own life as we speak – things that will only become clear years down the road. Shrug. I like good writers and Hitchens can WRITE. Also, in general, I like his cultural pieces better than his political pieces. I like his writing on writers, and he’s introduced me to a lot of authors I now love. So there. Fill your own bookshelves with the books you love, and I’ll do the same.

40. The Parthenon Marbles: The Case for Reunification, by Christopher Hitchens, Nadine Gordimer, and Charalamabos Bouras
One of his earliest books, if I’m not mistaken, and I hadn’t read it before. It’s just outrageous that the British Museum hasn’t done what is clearly the right thing. Hitchens, Gordimer and Bouras make the case for the Parthenon Marbles – NOT the “Elgin marbles” – to be returned to where they belong.

41. The Kremlin Ball, by Curzio Malaparte
I first read this book a couple years ago, when NYRB Classics issued it in translation (first time in English, I believe). I couldn’t believe this book had existed for decades and I had never read it. Malaparte’s “novel” about wandering around through Soviet Moscow in the years right after the Revolution. The 20s. Stalin in power, but it’s not the 30s yet. Moscow in the 20s is described as a decadent re-creation of the exact same social hierarchy the Bolsheviks declared they wanted to destroy. A “Soviet elite” enjoying the spoils, all the perks of being high up in the regime. It’s gossipy, mean, and beautiful. Malaparte’s “Le Cote Basque”.

42. A Hitch in Time: Writings from the London Review of Books, by Christoper Hitchens
A new collection! Stuff I haven’t read!

43. Looking To Get Lost: Adventures in Music and Writing, by Peter Guralnick
I finally got to this one. I have been so looking forward to it. It’s rich and beautiful and personal, with detailed profiles of Dick Curliss, Tammy Wynette, Howlin’ Wolf, and on and on. I’ll be going back to this one again and again.

44. Language of the Third Reich: LTI: Lingua Tertii Imperii, by Victor Klemperer
Victor Klemperer’s two-volume journal – I Will Bear Witness – details his life in 1930s Dresden, married to an Aryan wife, and yet still feeling the vice tightening around them, bit by bit, chipping away at his freedom. Lost job, lost house, lost everything. It’s amazing that these diaries – broken up into pieces and hidden in cupboards or passed off to friends – survived the war, survived what happened in Dresden. One of the ways Klemperer kept himself sane, after he lost his job, as he watched the Nazi menace rear up all around him, was to take notes – every day – on how the language was changing, on what propaganda was doing to the language he loved so much. These notes he called Lingua Tertii Imperii (or LTI) – the Language of the Third Reich. If the madness ever ended, Klemperer thought he’d might like to write a book about all this one day. Well, the war did end. Klemperer survived. And he DID write that book. It’s not as well-known as it should be. I think it wasn’t translated into English for years. But it is a masterful indispensable work on propaganda.

45. From Bauhaus to Our House, by Tom Wolfe
There’s something about Tom Wolfe … I hadn’t read this one, and just had no idea about Bauhaus or any of this shit. It’s hilarious. Or, the way he writes about it is hilarious. I think of James Joyce’s comment, “I have come to the realization that I cannot write without offending people.” I think Tom Wolfe knew from the jump. I will annoy people, and I MUST annoy people, and I will use my writing to PIERCE the waves of self-deception around this or that “movement”. Anyway! The Bauhaus infiltration as told by someone who despised it all. lol

46. The Painted Word, by Tom Wolfe
See comments above. ^^ Here, he leaves architecture behind and goes after fine arts, painting.

47. Notebooks: 1936-1947, by Victor Serge
I am so grateful to NYRB for bringing out all of Serge’s stuff, with informative introductions, good translations, the whole nine yards. These notebooks are fascinating and upsetting and REVEALING. Serge died in 1947. In many ways, he remained a true believer – in the original ideals of Socialism – but he saw the writing on the wall early – earlier than anyone else, at least on the inside. And for that, he was exiled, or imprisoned, or on the run for the rest of his life. Here, he arrives in Mexico – and is thrust into the middle of a Communist/Socialist/Stalinist/Trotskyite war – like, a real war. I mean, Trotsky was murdered. Serge had a target on his back. He couldn’t get published since Stalinists – or just good old-fashioned scaredy-cat liberals – had so infiltrated the publishing world in America and elsewhere, that he couldn’t catch a break. He was un-publishable. I have no idea how he survived. There were editors who tried to help. Even amidst the despair of a ragged life lived on the run, he wrote in his notebook every day, describing what he saw, who he met, and also reading the tea leaves about what was going on in Russia. He was, 9 times out of 10, right on all counts.

48. Another Day of Life, by Ryszard Kapuściński
It’s been a while. He’s one of my favorite authors. This is about one of his first big assignments as a foreign journalist, covering the complete chaos in Angola after the Portuguese left.

49. Did Ye Hear Mammy Died?: A Memoir, by Séamas O’Reilly
Oh God, this is so good. I was laughing out loud throughout, an amazing thing since it’s about his mother dying when he was five, leaving his dad to raise their eleven – yes, eleven – children alone. But of course it’s hilarious. It’s an Irish story.

50. The Trial of Henry Kissinger, by Christopher Hitchens
Hitchens as prosecutor.

51. Two by Two: Tango, Two-Step, and the L.A. Night, by Eve Babitz
I hadn’t read this. It was the book Eve Babitz was working on when she accidentally set herself on fire, an accident which led to her stopping writing for about 20 years. The book is a charming funny tour through the various dance scenes in Los Angeles. Eve loved dancing, and so it’s a personal journey – of her experiences seeking out the best places to dance, to learn to dance. I love her.

52. Mauve Gloves & Madmen, Clutter & Vine: And Other Stories, Sketches, and Essays, by Tom Wolfe
This is the collection where Tom Wolfe not only goes off on the “Me Decade”, but gives the “Me Decade” its name.

53. The Girl Who Wanted a Boy, by Paul Zindel
There’s a pretty funny story about this book from my high school years but I’ll tell it some other time. I haven’t read it SINCE then. But I still have my original copy, a cheap paperback, from way back then. I love Paul Zindel. I think I’m going to do a re-read of all of his stuff this year. Something about this book struck such a deep chord in me when I was 15, 16 – and I still remember the feeling. I felt it again as I read it this past time. And you know what? It still works. Don’t let the title fool you. It’s a bad title. It’s about a teenage girl who falls madly in love with a guy whose picture she sees in the paper. She gets swept away. He is hers. They are soulmates. So she decides to go out and get him. She projects like crazy. He is all that is good and right and beautiful and even mythic. Meanwhile, she lives in total chaos. Her home life is nuts. No stability. Her dad has de-camped. She doesn’t really have friends. It’s all very blue-collar Staten Island, as all of Zindel’s books are. It’s actually very very DARK. And something in that darkness really spoke to me as a kid. It was good to re-visit. It all came back to me vividly as I was reading it. It was like no time had passed at all.

54. The Portable Edmund Burke, by Edmund Burke
Yet another entry in the French Revolution Generation theme of 2022 reading. His book on the French Revolution is a classic, which I’ve read a number of times. I am also familiar with his equally classic essay on aesthetics – the “sublime and the beautiful” – an opening salvo of the Romantic movement. But the majority of writing in this portable collection was new to me. Speeches in Parliament on the Irish question, the Indian question, the American Revolution, on France, on domestic issues … Even though he’s known as the father of conservatism, dedicated to preserving tradition, etc., he’s also quite forward-thinking, especially in regards to dealing with poverty and the poor – In fact, much of what he says could be boiled down to Socialism or at the very least Socialistic solutions, and any conservative Burkean nerd who doesn’t see that is indoctrinated beyond all hope. He was pro American Revolution, he was anti French Revolution, and his thoughts on the British Empire’s role in India is fascinating, to say the least. One line, and I’m paraphrasing – “They had magnificent civilizations while we were living in huts in the woods.” So have a little respect, in other words. I read one essay (or speech, or pamphlet) a day. A palate cleanser.

55. Diary of a Foreigner in Paris, by Curzio Malaparte
Malaparte again! I have NYRB to thank, AGAIN. For bringing these rare books to us. This is the diary of his time in Paris right after the Second World War ended. His behavior during the war was seen as suspect – he had this reputation for cozying up to the tyrants of the Axis powers. Kaputt was what did this to him. What was Malaparte FOR? It was a very for/against time. And it wasn’t clear what he was for, beyond “being next to whoever was in power”. He’s such an interesting guy. An opportunist? Maybe. An adventurer? For sure. Full of contradictions. At any rate, he found himself ostracized in Paris, which he writes about ad nauseum, in tones of blase indifference and also aggrieved self-pity. A mix. He keeps mentioning that he actually spent time in prison in Italy for resisting Mussolini – meanwhile France had surrendered to Germany, so who were they to criticize him? Lots of guilt and shame swirling around in the air. Such an interesting read.

56. How to Be an Artist, by Jerry Saltz
I finally read it! I love him!

57. Who Will Run the Frog Hospital?, by Lorrie Moore
More novella than novel, a wispy little thing, but filled with poignancy, and perceptive insights on being a teenager, on small town life, on teenage-girl friendships. Lorrie Moore has a gift for weaving together uneasy truths and outright comedy, sensory reality and character development, atmosphere, and she does all this without ever seeming like she’s straining for effect. I read this when it first came out – I’m a big Lorrie Moore fan – but it’s been years.

58. A Chill in the Air: An Italian War Diary, 1939-1940, by Iris Origo
Fascinating! Origo was a writer, and this slim diary wasn’t published until years and years after her death. It’s a diary of a very short period of time, very short but packed with events and import. Living in Italy with her husband – and pregnant (although her pregnancy gets maybe one line in the whole thing. You read this diary and suddenly she’s like “Oh yeah and I went into labor two days ago” and you’re like “You’ve been pregnant this whole time??”) – They live on a farm, and they are waiting to see which way Italy will go in Hitler’s upcoming clash with all of Europe. Will they be on Hitler’s side? What will happen then? Nobody wants to be buddies with Hitler. The main theme of the book – and what she writes about every single day – is how difficult it is to discern what is actually going on in an atmosphere drenched in propagada. Every news item has to be basically translated OUT of propaganda-speak. There’s a constant struggle to find radio stations that might be a bit more truthful, and … there’s such a real sense of isolation, how propaganda creates a bubble from which a thinking person can’t find their way out. Very glad I read this one.

59. Dime-Store Alchemy: The Art of Joseph Cornell, by Charles Simic
A lovely little book by the poet Charles Simic about Joseph Cornell’s boxes. An impressionistic collage of pieces, using 9 boxes as inspiration: what do the boxes make you think, or feel, or dream? Despite my full-immersion into Jospeh Cornell years ago, when I was working on the theatre project we were developing about Cornell’s life … I don’t think I read this.

60. Women Talking, by Miriam Toews
I read in preparation for the film, which I reviewed for Ebert. There’s a phoniness going on here that I can’t shake. In the film and in the book. I gave the film three stars, but I think it’s pretty obvious I wasn’t as blown away by it as many others seem to be.

61. The Prince, by Niccolò Machiavelli
I read this once every couple of years. It’s a go-to, particularly in times of political strife. And, when ISN’T it a time of political strife, amirite?

62. The Gadget, by Paul Zindel
This would make a great film! A teenage kid is brought to America with his scientist father, after nearly dying in a Blitz attack from Nazi planes. His father is part of a team of people brought together to work on something top-secret in America. The kid misses his mother (who stayed in England), and feels a sense of dislocation, particularly when he and his dad move to a remote weird little town in New Mexico called Los Alamos. The town is so weird it’s not even on a map. What’s THAT about, the kid wonders. He notices lots of strange things going on. His father is too busy with his work to pay attention to his kid. The kid gets close to the secret, the secret of what is Really Going On out there in the desert. Seriously: this should be a movie.

63. Cinema Speculation, by Quentin Tarantino
Love it. Caveat: There are so many typos and it’s very irritating. QT deserves better. But it’s fun to listen to him talk. He seems to have seen every film ever made. He makes references and connections, looping together timelines and inspirations, and his speculations are also fun. For example: let’s imagine Taxi Driver as directed by Brian De Palma? Also, his tribute to Floyd is sincere and touching. I also was so happy to hear his praise of “Elvis movies”.

64. Michael Curtiz: A Life in Film, by Alan Rode
I know I’m years late to this. I’ve had it since it came out. It’s just so massive and I needed to clear the deck. It’s a definitive work, and I admire so much the amount of research done to fill out our picture of this great director. Rode is a wonderful writer and scholar.

65. Hons and Rebels, by Jessica Mitford
I was just in Memphis last week and was laid low for two days by a massive flu. I thought it was Covid, but it wasn’t. It was so irritating. I’m in Memphis and I can’t DO anything but lie around in bed, nursing this massive cold. It was weird, the flu hit me like a freight train, and then … it vanished just as quickly. Anyway, I read Hons and Rebels in those two days. I can’t get enough of the Mitfords, and I had somehow never read this. The image of Jessica scratching a hammer and sickle into the window, and then her sister Unity scratching a swastika right next to it … this is how the book opens. This is the Mitford family. Wild. Hons and Rebels ends with the death of her husband, whom she ran away with to go fight in the Spanish Civil War. She was still a teenager. Growing up in THAT family, you’d have to do something extraordinary to break free. You couldn’t just walk away. Extraordinary book.

66. The Door, by Magda Szabó –
Originally published in 1987, finally translated into English in 1995, and then translated again in 2005. This novel is major. We English speakers are so reliant on translation. More books AREN’T translated than ARE. So I am very grateful to all the translators out there, and all the publishers who invest in translations, so we can read these magnificent books written in other languages. I was, frankly, blown away by The Door. A novel about a writer – obviously loosely based on the author herself – who is sometimes “in” with the Hungarian Communist party, and sometimes “out” – and the writer takes in a maid. Emerence shows up. She’s no ordinary maid. In fact, she takes over the writer’s life. She dominates the writer’s mind. She is a MASSIVE force of nature, and I will never ever forget Emerence. Szabo had her own issues with The Powers That Be in Hungary’s oppressive Communist government – and success always means compromise to some degree: to get success, you have to play nice. This element is seemingly background noise to the main event, which is Emerence … but it’s all part of the nightmare-scape atmosphere of shame, complicity, misunderstanding, guilt, suspicion. The Door is a masterpiece. I will read more of Szabo’s work now.

2022 tally (I count it by books, not author. If the same author appears multiple times, I count the author each time)
19 fiction
47 non-fiction
29 books by women
37 books by men

Previously

2021 books read
2020 books read
2019 books read
2018 books read
2017 books read
2016 books read
2015 books read
2014 books read
2013 books read
2012 books read
2011 books read
2010 books read
2009 books read
2008 books read
2007 books read
2006 books read
2005 books read

Posted in Books | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Happy Birthday, J.R.R. Tolkien

425335-tolkien_photo_c

The German publishing firm of Rutten & Loening contacted Allen & Unwin in 1938 (the publishers of The Hobbit) and wanted to negotiate with them for a German translation of the book. But first and foremost, they wanted to know if Tolkien was of “arisch” origin. (Aryan) Tolkien wrote a brief note to Stanley Unwin, saying that he wanted to refuse to give them an answer. He didn’t want to add to “the wholly pernicious and unscientific race-doctrine” by comfirming or denying. However – he didn’t want to ruin his chances of The Hobbit being read in Germany. He submitted to Mr. Unwin two drafts of letters to the German publishers, and left it up to Unwin to decide.

Here is one of the drafts:

25 July 1938
To Rutten & Loening Verlag
Dear Sirs,
Thank you for your letter … I regret that I am not clear as to what you intend by arisch. I am not of Aryan extraction: that is Indo-iranian; as far as I am aware none of my ancestors spoke Hindustani, Persian, Gypsy, or any related dialects. But if I am to understand that you are enquiring whether I am of Jewish origin, I can only reply that I regret that I appear to have no ancestors of that gifted people. My great-great-grandfather came to England in the eighteenth century from Germany: the main part of my descent is therefore purely English, and I am an English subject – which should be sufficient. I have been accustomed, nonetheless, to regard my German name with pride, and continued to do so throughout the period of the late regrettable war, in which I served in the English army. I cannot, however, forbear to comment that if impertinent and irrelevant inquiries of this sort are to become the rule in matters of literature, then the time is not far distant when a German name will no longer be a source of pride.

Your enquiry is doubtless made in order to comply with the laws of your own country, but that this should be held to apply to the subjects of another state would be improper, even if it had (as it has not) any bearing whatsoever on the merits of my work or its sustainability for publication, of which you appear to have satisfied yourselves without reference to my Abstammung.

I trust you will find this reply satisfactory, and remain yours faithfully

J.R.R. Tolkien

As a child, I was obsessed with The Hobbit. That first chapter is one of the best first chapters of all time. It thrilled me on such a deep and satisfying level it was almost overwhelming. I read Lord of the Rings and even parts of The Silmarillion, but nothing came close to how The Hobbit grabbed me. I was more into the Narnia books, the Anne of Green Gables and Emily series, Madeleine L’Engle’s books and Enid Blyton books. There was plenty to keep me busy.

I reviewed both Desolation of Smaug and Battle of the Five Armies for Rogerebert.com (reviews at the links).

I went through a big Tolkien phase in 2003-2004, mainly because I was reading his correspondence. The correspondence is truly extraordinary, because he was so eloquent about his thought process in re: creating that world, and there are times you get the sense that all of it was unfolding in front of HIS eyes as well. There’s even a sense, at times, that he knows he is not in charge of it at all. IT’S in charge of HIM.

Exhibit A on that score:

Tolkien’s publisher Allen & Unwin wrote to Tolkien, asking for progress on the sequel to The Hobbit. Tolkien replied at length on August 31 1938, and here’s an excerpt:

I have begun again on the sequel to the ‘Hobbit’ – The Lord of the Ring. It is now flowing along, and getting quite out of hand. It has reached about Chapter VII and progresses towards quite unforeseen goals. I must say I think it is a good deal better in places and some ways than the predecessor; but that does not say that I think it either more suitable or more adapted for its audience. For one thing it is, like my own children (who have the immediate serial rights), rather ‘older’. I can only say that Mr. [C.S.] Lewis (my stout backer of the Times and T.L.S.) professes himself more than pleased. If the weather is wet in the next fortnight we may have got still further on. But it is no bed-time story.

“getting quite out of hand”
“quite unforeseen goals”
“no bed-time story”

Wonderful.

Posted in Books, On This Day, writers | Tagged , , | 19 Comments

Review: Turn Every Page: The Adventures of Robert Caro and Robert Gottlieb (2022)

My last review of 2022. I enjoyed this documentary about the decades-long working partnership between editor Bob Gottlieb and author Robert Caro. I reviewed for Ebert.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: Women Talking (2022)

Sarah Polley’s film adaptation of Miriam Towes’ novel Women Talking is now out. Not as bowled over by this as many others seem to be. Not saying everyone else is wrong, of course, just that I’ve seen this twice now and … it’s fine. My review is up at Ebert.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Rogerebert.com: Individual Top 10s of 2022

All the contributors at Rogerebert.com submitted Top 10s, listed here. A good guide if you’re looking for something good to watch. Many of us have the same films on each of our lists, but after that … sky’s the limit, in terms of variety.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

“I will stand with the families of the prisoners and murdered and demand their rights.” — Taraneh Alidoosti

Taraneh Alidoosti, one of the most famous actresses in Iran, has been arrested. Nobody knows where she is. [UPDATE: It’s been confirmed by her father that she’s in Evin Prison. Where they put “political” prisoners. Where they put Jafar Panahi. Notorious for its its torture of prisoners. Bad bad place.] Her Instagram (where she had 8 million followers) has also vanished. Her last two posts were of 1. a photo of her standing in public without a headscarf, holding a sign that said, in the Kurdish language, “Women Life Freedom” and 2. a post condemning the first execution, that of Mohsen Shekari.

Her arrest is significant. As Jafar Panahi’s arrest is significant. This is not to say the arrests and torture and now executions of other non-celebrity protestors is not significant. But when the regime brazenly targets international figures – well-known and beloved in Iran and out – it shows they really don’t care about public opinion. Public outcry used to have an impact (it did back in 2011, when Panahi was released from prison. Yes, he was handed down a lifetime ban on making movies, and he no longer could leave Iran. But he wasn’t in prison. Yes, he was under house arrest. But he wasn’t in prison. This was all because international pressure got to be too much, and the regime decided it was a “bad look” for them. Or, I’m just guessing. Nobody in the regime is just going to come out and SAY that.) So now, with the arrest of Alidoosti in particular, the most high-profile target thus far, it shows they no longer give a fuck. In fact, arrests of these figures are used for symbolic reasons. If internationally known celebrities are not safe, then YOU – the plebe on the street – are not safe.

I followed Taraneh on Instagram. She often posted about what was going on in Iran. It was clear where she stood on all the important issues. What was different was she was doing so from within the borders of the country. So many of Alidoosti’s contemporaries have chosen to leave Iran, and live in exile. She stayed. Think about her having 8 million followers. Julia Roberts has 10 million. That’s how famous Taraneh is. I feel it’s important to underline, particularly for Western-focused people, or for people who don’t watch foreign films, or whatever. No judgment, but there are MASSIVE stars in the world who have never set foot in Hollywood. Alidoosti is one of them. The regime knew her arrest would make international news. Not only do they not care, the headlines are the point.

The public executions have begun. The regime appears to be executing mostly young handsome dynamic men (although hundreds have been killed in the protests. We’re talking about state-ordered executions now – probably in public. Choosing handsome young men – who share rap music on their social media, or videos of themselves rock climbing and being amazing and strong – is symbolic: We are cutting down the new generation. And I’m sure you’ve heard – and if you haven’t, then here it is – that it’s a crime in Iran to execute a virgin, and so young virgin women are raped in prison before execution. A 14-year-old girl was just tortured, raped, and killed, taken to the hospital (too late) with a “severe vaginal tear”. This is what this regime is. This is what they believe and how they act. Monstrous. Disgusting. A disgrace. Anyone who blabbers on about “reform” – and there are many of them – and the press parrots their talking points – is propping up THAT. You cannot reform a regime that rapes teenage girls before executing them. The regime is openly evil. What’s going on in Iran right now isn’t a “riot” or even a “protest”. It’s a revolution. Please try to recognize reality. Everything is moving into a very dangerous phase right now. These executed young men all came out in support of the “women, life, freedom” protests, which have continued unabated till this day. One of them basically put up traffic cones to block off the street where a protest was taking place. He was executed for this.

Alidoosti had been silent on her Instagram for months. I am sure she was going through a lot. People always criticize celebs for not “using their platform” to support/critique this or that cause. But that’s an outlook coming from privilege. For the people in Iran – and other countries living under tyranny – it’s a matter of life and death. There are very good reasons not to “use your platform”. Taraneh has a young child, loved ones. Not everyone is willing to literally DIE. This isn’t about losing the money from your relationship with Balenciaga. This is about losing your LIFE. So Alidoosti clearly did some soul-searching, and finally posted the picture above. Her brave act made headlines. That post alone got over 1 million views. I admit: I worried for her. My heart swelled with emotion at her bravery. That Instagram post meant she was willing to risk her life. A month later she put up a post condemning the first execution. Apparently she’s being charged with putting out false information and/or “fake news” about the executions, whatever, blah blah, tell it to someone who buys your bullshit.


Taraneh Alidoosti in her breakthrough role in 2002’s “I’m Taraneh, 15”, where she plays a teenage girl forced into marriage. The marriage breaks up after 4 months, the husband moves to Germany, and the girl finds herself pregnant with no husband. She decides – against enormous familial and social pressure – to have the baby and raise it herself.

Alidoosti has been doing steady excellent work in film and television for almost 20 years, sometimes in films which get international attention, particularly her collaborations with Asghar Farhadi (Fireworks Wednesday, About Elly and the Oscar-winner for Best Foreign Film, The Salesman). Any time she does anything she makes headlines. When The Salesman was nominated for Best Foreign Film, she made a public statement saying she would boycott the ceremony because of 45’s “travel ban”, i.e. Muslim ban, don’t get it twisted. She was pilloried for this by the usual suspects (what does it feel like to be so PREDICTABLE on a daily basis?) and celebrated in others. THIS is “using your platform”. She was just at the Cannes Film Festival in May of this year with her latest film, Leila’s Brothers (which I haven’t seen yet).


Taraneh Alidoosti and Houman Seyyedi, “Fireworks Wednesday”

I first discovered her when I saw Asghar Farhadi’s Fireworks Wednesday at the Tribeca Film Festival in 2007. (I reviewed for Slant). (Fireworks Wednesday was how I discovered Farhadi as well as Hediyeh Tehrani). I was so TAKEN with Alidoosti’s portrayal of a traditional woman, wearing a traditional chador (the chador becomes a plot point later), getting embroiled in the dissolution of a city-slicker couple’s marriage.(You could see this kind of dynamic operating in Farhadi’s international smash hit Oscar winner A Separation too, my review here.)


Taraneh Alidoosti, “Fireworks Wednesday”

There’s a mischievous glimmer in Alidootsi’s eyes, joy unfettered, open to life, but … you worry for her, too. She seems so innocent.

Since then I’ve been following her. Farhadi’s About Elly was made in 2009. I think it had a brief release over here, but if you didn’t see it then, you couldn’t see it at all. It never made it to DVD. For years I was unable to see it, and felt urgently I needed to see it – particularly after A Separation. About Elly was a Holy Grail kind of film for me since I had so loved Fireworks Wednesday and was bowled over by A Separation. Finally, after A Separation won Best Foreign Film – as well as every other award on the planet – About Elly came to America. I went to a screening of it with my friend Farran. She just reminded me that the screening was sold out, no room at the inn, and we somehow finagled our way in. We both felt the same: WE MUST SEE THIS. We have been thwarted for YEARS and this might be our only chance! We were absolutely STUNNED by About Elly (I wrote about it – at length – here).


About Elly

If Asghar Farhadi shot About Elly in 2008, then he followed it up with A Separation, released in 2011. By my count, that’s two stone-cold masterpieces back to back. I actually think About Elly is the superior film, and I say that thinking A Separation is as good as it gets.

About Elly (in which Alidoosti plays the title character) is not exactly a remake of Michelangelo Antonioni’s eerie L’Avventura, but L’Avventura is its organizing principle and inspiration. Like A Bigger Splash is a “remake” of The Swimming Pool. It’s basically the same story as L’Avventura: A group of city-slickers go on a weekend vacation together. One of the women brings along her kids’ schoolteacher, a young woman named Elly. Elly is clearly from a more traditional background than the others. She has had to lie to her mother to let her go on this trip. Still. Elly relaxes into the big group, or at least tries to. They make her feel welcome, even though they gossip and whisper behind her back. It’s a weird vibe.


The murderer’s row of talented Iranian actors in About Elly, including Golshifteh Farahani, eventually “banned” from Iranian cinema for not wearing a head scarf on the red carpet. She now lives in exile. You’ll remember her from Jim Jarmusch’s “Paterson”

Undercurrents seethe in About Elly‘s first section. Beneath all the laughter and camaraderie are disturbing ebbs and flows. And then Elly vanishes. Seemingly off the face of the earth. What happened? Where is she? Is she lost in the crashing surf Just like the woman in L’Avventura? How can a person just VANISH without a trace?

Alidoosti is haunting in About Elly, mostly because she plays Elly’s joy and sense of possibility.


Taraneh Alidoosti, About Elly

She knows she’s risking trouble at home by going out – alone – with this group of less-than-traditional adults, none of whom are her family members. But she goes anyway. There’s maybe sort of kind of a possibility that this is a matchmaking trip, as well. There will be a single guy present (the to-die-for Shahab Hosseini, who was also in A Separation) and so maybe … possibly … if they get to know each other, something could happen? Elly is shy about this, but seems open to it, or at least her behavior is interpreted as open, but she’s troubled too. You can see shadows of uneasiness float across her face, but then she cracks a smile to cover it up. This woman is living under a very dangerous “regime” at home. You can feel it. Would they not allow her to marry a man of her own choosing? Would they be so scandalized at the thought of her just meeting a man by herself out there in the world that they would punish her, maybe even kill her? She never divulges any of this but it’s all on her face.

There’s a scene where Elly flies a kite, running up and down the beach.


Taraneh Alidoosti, About Elly

We don’t know Elly’s backstory here, we won’t know it until much later in the film. She’s an unknown. A blank. And yet she is the focus of this gossipy pushy group of friends. Taraneh Alidoosti has to SUGGEST what is going on without language. Elly’s uneasiness is palpable and yet time and time again it is either ignored or misunderstood. She’s so very alone. The friends are all giddy with their matchmaking, and although she seems open to it, she’s also uncomfortable with the feeling that so much focus is being put on her by this group of giggling adults she doesn’t know. Nobody notices. Or they interpret her behavior wrong. She’s “standoffish”. She’s “shy” (and in this group, that’s a bad thing). Farhadi’s stock-in-trade: humans’ misunderstanding each other as they try to read between the lines – and get everything wrong..

The flying the kite sequence is an example of a masterful symbiotic collaboration between director and actor. The filmmaking disturbs us and yet what we see is Elly shaking off her (as we learn later) considerable troubles and enjoying herself. But is she enjoying herself, really? Even her eventual whoops of exhilaration and triumphant giggles – the kite is airborne – have undercurrents of despair: her joy is struggling against something. Farhadi’s filmmaking in the kite sequence – the jagged handheld, where the and Elly is all you see, the camera struggling to even capture what is going on – is clearly front and center, the dominating force of the sequence, and therefore it may dominate the attention of the scene. It’s the kind of camera work that tells the story. Okay. But put that aside please and focus on what Alidoosti is playing, the levels that are present for the character. She’s so in sync with the camera’s energy and intention: she and the camera are one – and she is also one with what the scene will mean, ultimately, in the larger arc of the story. The first time you see it, you feel intensely worried and you don’t even know why. Alidoosti is not just playing joy and freedom, in order to “highlight” the loss that follows. No. That would be a cliche. Watch closely. She’s still a mystery to us here, but to an astute observer – as opposed to the group she’s with, all of whom have an agenda – she’s telling us everything. Layers of the onion are pulled back over the rest of the film and you learn just how much this young woman was dealing with. How much everything was costing her.

It’s the final moment she’s seen by anyone. She vanishes right afterwards.

And from that moment on she haunts the film like a condemning ghost.

Like Elly, Alidoosti has vanished. Or “been” vanished. Nobody saw her taken away from her house. This event has made headlines around the world. As it was designed to do.

In one of her final posts on Instagram, Alidoosti wrote:

“I do not have a passport or residence anywhere except Iran. I’ll stay and look you straight in the eyes like all these normal people when I scream for my rights. I’ve inherited this courage from the women of my land, who for years have been living their lives, every day with resistance. I will stay, I will not quit, I will stand with the families of the prisoners and murdered and demand their rights.”


Taraneh Alidoosti, The Salesman

Posted in Actors, Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

La Cérémonie folie à deux

I saw La Cérémonie when I lived in Chicago, right behind the Music Box Theatre. In the apartment where Window-Boy kept breaking into my house. A little alley across from that house led right to the front door of the movie theatre, so I would walk through the alley and go see stuff. (I had no consciousness of how lucky I was, or how singular this situation was.) I saw all kinds of things there for the first time, including Claude Chabrol’s La Cérémonie on its first run. I went alone and it was a rainy night. The movie unnerved me so much – unsettled me so deeply – I was scared to walk through the short dark little alley, an alley I knew by heart. I walked all the way around on the well-lit main streets, so a 30-second walk became a 10-minute walk in the rain. I was so freaked out by this damn thing and it still freaks me out.

It works in mysterious ways. Search and search for the moment everything “turns” and you won’t find it. I think it’s because the potential is there from the very first shot of the very first scene. Sandrine Bonnaire’s illiterate maid Sophie doesn’t turn into anything. She’s already there when she walks into the movie.

Nothing happens in the language. Or, almost nothing. It’s very sneaky, very tricky, it’s all inference and suggestion. On a certain level, the two women (Bonnaire and Isabelle Huppert) don’t need language. They never say to each other, “Okay so here’s what we’re gonna do.” They never commiserate. But … there’s something there underneath all the banter. A mischievous resentment towards those rich people. Nothing too heavy though. And so when the two women finally do take action, it almost seems like a lark at first. Like they’re just being mischievous. But … they’re not. It’s dead serious. And neither had to say a thing to the other.

Each woman clocked the other instantly, at first meeting, first eye-contact (above) as “Wow. You are like me.” And for women like this, it must be a rare occurrence to “recognize” themselves in another. Other people have warm family relationships, or they have a crowd of friends, they can flirt with the milkman, they are connected to humanity. To these two women, who have none of those things, all of that just seems weird. They don’t get along in the world. They’re both off-putting to others, but in different ways. The first moment they looked at each other, it’s like they had a sense. Or caught the SCENT. Like animals smelling each other on some supra-sensory level. Neither woman needs nudging or convincing. At all. It SEEMS like Huppert is the leader and instigator. But watch very very closely: She is not. They’re both already like that. Bonnaire and Huppert are so good at suggesting these undercurrents, without ever seeming to PLAY it. Both these women are missing something. In fact, they are missing THE thing. Fellow human feeling may be the best way to put it. And people like that – you could call them sociopaths – have a hard time in the world. They stand out. They have to camouflage their true natures. They’re not like other people.

La Cérémonie is one of my favorite movies dealing with the “folie à deux” relationship. The Leopold and Loeb type thing. Or Jean Genet’s The Maids. Or Heavenly Creatures or Badlands. I’d put Macbeth and Lady M on there too. Would Macbeth do what he did without his wife hissing insinuatingly in his ear, spurring him on to psychopathy, spurring him on past his limits?

I was just about to say that alone neither women in La Cérémonie would have done what they did, but that’s not true. Information is given, perhaps unreliable, about incidents in both their pasts. Horrifying incidents, never confirmed, but … you don’t need confirmation. Both are “on the run” – and this is another thing they clock about each other instantly without saying a word. It takes one to know one. Again: it’s rare that a human being is legit “on the run”. Not many people find themselves in such a circumstance. But these women do, and one glance at the other reveals the truth. Oh wow! You’re like me!

They don’t visibly or audibly make the decision to do what they do. They never say anything out loud, not even indirectly. Once they start “acting out” in that last scene, the event cannot be stopped. The women were marching towards it all along.

No way would I walk down that dark alley because I was afraid I might meet the two of them at the end of it.

Here’s an interesting video about Chabrol’s use of off-screen sound in La Cérémonie.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments