On Once Upon a Time in … Hollywood: How do you memorize all those lines? Or … not. Because you don’t have any lines.

I know I haven’t really written on it, but my pal R. Kurt Osenlund interviewed me about it for a gigantic piece he was writing for Playboy. It’s a doozy of an article. I talked mostly about the “controversy” about Margot Robbie not having as many lines as her co-stars. There are not enough eyerolls in the world. This is one of the many reasons why there needs to be more writers who actually understand acting writing about film.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

September 2019 Viewing Diary

Satanic Panic (2019; d. Chelsea Stardust)
Rebecca Romijn is reason enough to see this. My review at Ebert.

A Hidden Life (2019; d. Terrence Malick)
The new Terrence Malick film, about WWII conscientious objector Franz Jägerstätter, a man from Austria, the only person in his village to vote against the 1938 Anschluss, who refused to sign a loyalty oath to Hitler, was imprisoned and then executed in 1943. An intense film, a very Malick film, spiritual and seeking and pained. Almost three hours long.

Chained for Life (2019; d. Aaron Schimberg)
SUCH a good film. My review for Ebert here.

Mindhunter, Season 2, episode 5
The series is so good. I keep wanting to re-visit it.

The Driver (1978; d. Walter Hill)
Part of my gratifying deep dive into the films of Walter Hill. As you’ve guessed, I’ve been working on something. It was such a fun project. Will probably launch in November. The Driver was a real revelation. Ryan O’Neal, Isabelle Adjani, Bruce Dern, nocturnal, taciturn, O’Neal at his withholding best – a sweet spot for him: calm and unruffled, almost cold, but also starting to freak out that he’s being framed. Plus: unbelievable car chases. Dizzying. They don’t make ’em like that anymore.

Late Spring/Regrets For Our Youth (2009; d. Aaron Schimberg)
Watched in preparation for Chained for Life review. A short film about (among other things) Schimberg’s operation to fix his cleft palate.

Johnny Handsome (1989; d. Walter Hill)
I’ve re-watched this a bunch this year. First for my piece about “men looking at themselves in the mirror,” a piece that had been percolating for a decade, and I finally wrote it. I put it off for a reason. Halfway through struggling to write it, I realized it was actually a book. Or it could be. There are so many memorable scenes in this sub-category. Robert De Niro in Taxi Driver, Marlon Brando in Reflections in a Golden Eye, and many more. But one of the best – seriously, top of the heap – is the moment in Johnny Handsome where Mickey Rourke peels off the bandages and sees his new face. It is so much deeper than the surrounding movie. There are so many layers to the moment, and it happens in stages. When it finally reaches its nadir – or apex – the walls literally blow back, the roof comes off. I watched with my sister Jean, and she gasped and said, “Can we re-wind that and watch again?” Humorous tangent: Michael, whom I have written about often, primarily here, but also here, the long-time-ago short-term boyfriend, yet lifelong friend, wrote to me a long while back to scold me when I wrote on here that I had never seen Johnny Handsome before. He was pissed, because he had actually showed me the movie. We rented it from Blockbuster because he needed me to see it (loving Mickey Rourke was one of our many bonds). To Michael, it was an extremely special memory. And I had totally forgotten it. Lol.

Tree of Life (2011; d. Terrence Malick)
In preparation for my piece on A Hidden Life, I re-watched all of Malick’s films this month. Which was … yeah, intense. I didn’t re-watch Badlands, because I know it so well, and had just re-watched it for my piece on the use of “Love is Strange” for Criterion. Tree of Life is a film like no other and I love it. I reviewed it for Capital New York (now Politico) when it came out.

Sleeping With Other People (2015; d. Leslye Headland)
I remembered loving this movie and I wasn’t wrong. Allison and I watched it. Written and directed by Leslye Headland, Natasha Lyonne’s co-creator for the great Russian Doll. I’m a huge fan. Sleeping with Other People has one of the most sex-positive and female-empowered scene I’ve ever seen. In its specificity and simplicity, it’s radical. In the middle of a bad hookup, where the sex is not going well, she takes control to show him how she likes it. And he is thrilled and grateful. Men are not mind readers. They’re human beings. And most of them want you to feel good. If he’s not doing it the way you like it, take a chance and show him. Turn that shit around. The good men will love it, because they want you to feel good. She is a ROLE MODEL in that scene. I really like this movie.

Untouchable (2019; d. Ursula Macfarlane)
The story of Harvey Weinstein. Stark contrast to what I just wrote above. There’s a difference between an unsatisfying hookup and an assault from a predator. Listening to all these women’s stories made us (Allison and I watched it together) see red. So proud of all these women for coming forward. The pain is still palpable, even though, in many cases, the assaults happened decades ago. The woman who was assaulted by him back when he was a concert promoter in Buffalo could barely speak at points. Her story shows it wasn’t just power and fame that made Weinstein a monster. He was a predator BEFORE he was famous. What a gross man. Good riddance.

The Thin Red Line (1998; d. Terrence Malick)
The gap in films has always fascinated me. You had to be there to “get” how big a deal it was that Malick was re-emerging. It was an EVENT. It’s so strange sometimes to watch this film: there are all these huge names in it, George Clooney, Jared Leto, Woody Harrelson – relegated to glorified “extras.” Adrian Brodywas cast as the star of the film, he did promotion for it, and he is barely in it. That was also a big deal at the time.

Mindhunter, Season 1
Re-watched the whole thing. It’s so good, so rich! The actors they cast in small roles! The casting director deserves so much credit. Many of the actors are character actors, with barely a “Hey, that’s That Guy” recognition factor. They are new to us, and so we come to them fresh, with no associations. This gives the series an almost documentary-like factor. Fantastic.

Heroin(e) (2017; d Elaine McMillion Sheldon)
Oscar-nominated documentary about the effects the opioid crisis has in one town, and three women fighting – in different ways – to stem the tide. Not optimistic, but heartening to see these women’s actions and devotion (and compassion). This is a human rights crisis, we are in a state of emergency. Fuck the Sackler family.

Unbelievable (2019)
Unbelievable is unbelievable. I have so much to say about it. Toni Collette at her very best. It feels like this was a role she was born to play, and she is an extremely versatile actress. (I was not a fan of Hereditary.) I’ve been a Toni Colette fan since Muriel’s Wedding. She’s in a really great zone here. And I just cannot say enough about Merritt Wever. She was very good in Charlie Says, earlier this year, a movie I have serious reservations about. Honestly, I think her approach should be studied by actors. She does not rush herself, she does not push. She takes her time. She is filled with actual thought. She doesn’t “act like” she’s thinking. I am blown away. It’s great that this isn’t a movie, but a mini-series, because there’s more of her to watch. I’ve watched the whole thing twice now.

The New World (2005; d. Terrence Malick)
This came out right around the time I started writing primarily about film here, and started frequenting various film bloggers. There were many many arguments about The New World. To call those arguments “lively” would be an understatement. The “sides” were clear. People were trying to “win” this argument – which has always seemed silly to me. Art is subjective. I wasn’t a “critic” then, I was still in an actor mindset, and so I watched, agog, as these people argued about this movie for WEEKS ON END. My takeaway was: What are these people going on and on about again? It was totally foreign to me. I had seen it, and admired it, but honestly didn’t really get why people were laying down their lives pro-or-con. To each his own, as my dad always said.

Jawline (2019; d.
I made Allison watch this. We watched it together. I knew she would love it. I was surprised by my response to this movie. I started off judgmental – I disagree quite strongly with this desire for Insta-fame thing … like, how about develop some real skills? But the film made me understand, the film made me get what girls see in these “stars.” My review for Ebert. I thought of the final line in my review when I started following Austyn on Instagram and found out he had just started college.

Rukus (2018; d. Brett Hanover)
I was a juror at Indie Memphis in the “Hometowners” category, along with Leah Giblin and Michael Taylor. When we sat down at our jury breakfast to vote, we found we were unanimous in thinking Rukus was the clear winner for Best Feature. We all fell in love with it. I wrote briefly about it for my roundup at Ebert, and will be publishing something more in-depth in a couple of weeks (it’s about to be released online). I want people to see this movie.

To the Wonder (2013; d. Terrence Malick)
After 20 years of silence, and then a movie, and then another 7 years of silence, Malick suddenly started coming out with a movie every couple of years. It seemed like a miracle (to those of us who are curious about him, that is). I have my beefs with Malick. The twirling woman motif. The waving treetops. But these are not “tics.” They are Malick showing us how he sees things, like any personal director. I was not a fan of To the Wonder when it first came out, and I think it still has problems. Ben Affleck seems lost. So does Rachel McAdams. She does not seem like a woman who owns a ranch and works a ranch at all. The two of them standing broodingly in fields of waving wheat looked like two actors who didn’t know what the hell was going on. And casting a non-actor in the lead female role also caused problems. But I have seen it a couple of times now, and my “way in” has to do with Malick’s view of nature. Which … I ALSO have issues with. Lol. But his responsiveness to beauty is something that helps me see, helps me look and perceive. It is one of his greatest gifts.

Knight of Cups (2016; d. Terrence Malick)
I barely remembered this one. Seeing Malick’s “the dangers of celebrity” take was very bizarre the first time out. It didn’t seem his milieu at all. Now I get it. Much of his work is about fathers and sons, this one too. Tree of Life is his main “statement” (if you can call it that) on fathers and sons. Again: for me, Knight of Cups is best in how it shows Malick’s way of seeing, his seeking searching eye. The parade of crying twirling women does nothing for me. But the waves and the grass and the skies … the parts of his work that annoy so many people … these are the things I most love in him.

Angel Heart (1987; d. Mickey Rourke)
It’s been years. This film radicalized my group of actor friends in college. We saw it and could not get over it, and him. My friend David and I went to Bickford’s, a diner in Rhode Island, and literally talked until the sun came up. Mickey Rourke was a revelation. I have written about him, and it. He is as good as I remember. I love in the extras on the DVD, a current-day Rourke is interviewed (holding a small dog in his hands, because of course), and he keeps saying, almost amused, “I really didn’t think at all about the performance beyond learning the lines.” That’s because you’re a genius. Peak Rourke.

This Is What Love in Action Looks Like (2011; d. Morgan Jon Fox)
Morgan Jon Fox is a filmmaker from Memphis. He shows up in a small “role” in Rukus, playing himself, re-enacting his own life (you must see Rukus). This is a documentary about the protests in Memphis against the “Love in Action” residency program, keeping kids there against their will, not to mention the whole harmful attitude that you can make gay kids straight. An amazing documentary, it’s on Amazon. Morgan Jon Fox was a leader in those protests, tireless in organizing and showing up, but also in documenting what was going on.

The Lighthouse (2019; d. Robert Eggers)
Robert Eggers is major. His debut was The VVitch. The Lighthouse is his follow-up, a film in black-and-white with only two main characters, played by Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson, both extraordinary. This film, people. It’s not out yet. You must see it. It’s about two lighthouse keepers.

Hustlers (2019; d. Lorene Scafaria)
I enjoyed it! Great cast.

The Death of Dick Long (2019; d. Daniel Scheinert)
I have no idea if my review will convince people to check this movie out. I hope so. I laughed out loud. I have a huge crush on Michael Abbot, Jr. This is a very very funny movie. A rarity nowadays.

Supernatural, Season 9, episode 23 “Do You Believe in Miracles?” (2014; d. )
I watched for Jensen Ackles dead in the final scene, since I knew I wanted to include him in my column about death scenes for Film Comment. He is so so good at Death.

The Swimmer (1968; d. Frank Perry)
What an extraordinary film, and WHAT a performance. The film really captures the surreal fable-like mood of John Cheever’s story. It’s written in a realistic way – so you think – but what is going on is not realistic at all.

Ash is Purest White (2019; d. Jia Zhangke)
One of the best films of the year, and Zhao Tao gives a tremendous performance.

Casino (1995; d. Martin Scorsese)
It’s been a while. I haven’t seen The Irishman yet. I am missing the entire New York Film Festival. I’m out of town this whole week. Oh well. I’ll catch up.

Adaptation (2002; d. Spike Jonze)
So wildly inventive I can’t believe it exists. I was howling watching it. Meryl Streep’s line reading: “We have to kill him.” So ridiculous! So bold and funny and smart.

Posted in Monthly Viewing Diary, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Happy Birthday, Truman Capote

Gerald Clarke wrote the definitive biography of Truman Capote. It looms as large in the Capote landscape as Richard Ellmann’s biography of Joyce looms in Joyce-land. Published in 1988, no book since addressing the onslaught in American culture that was Truman Capote has even come close to competing with Gerald Clarke’s masterpiece. (He also wrote a pretty definitive biography of Judy Garland as well.)

Truman Capote is one of my favorite writers and I have written a lot about him. All of the elements of his vast body of work – the elegiac tone of his earliest novels, the bittersweet tang of his short stories, his unmatched work as a journalist, while always remembering to take EVERY. SINGLE. THING he says with a pound of salt, and then his tragic tailspin at the end when he could barely write anymore – but even the late stuff is compulsively readable – it can’t help but be, it was written by Truman Capote … every single phase he went through as a writer has its fascinations.

My introduction to him was in middle school when we had to read his short story “Children On Their Birthdays in English class. It didn’t make as big an impression on me as some of the other books we had to read in class – like Paul Zindel’s The Pigman, for instance, which remains one of my favorite books of all time. But funnily enough, years and years later, when I was an adult, and obsessed with Truman Capote due to In Cold Blood, and went back to read everything: when I came across “Children On Their Birthdays” and re-read it, I remembered it almost word for word.

His work is something I revisit, over and over again. His chilling interview with Bobby Beausoleil, for example (which Beausoleil has since said was all bullshit. Like I said: pound of salt with Truman). And I love “Handcarved Coffins”, too, with its script format, and its pretense (is it pretense though?) that all of this really happened. Capote had already started to lose it at the time he wrote “Handcarved Coffins”. Words were starting to leave him. He had lost his confidence.

Norman Mailer:

Look at poor Truman. His attitude became, if I’m not recognized in my own time then something absolutely awful is taking place in society. And that vanity is something we all have to approach and walk around with great care. It can destroy a good part of us if we get into it. You know, you really have to be able to exhale, just exhale, and say, Why don’t we just leave it to history?

He was moving further and further away from strict narrative – not because it no longer interested him, but because the words would no longer come. Capote’s final years were harrowing, his writer’s block absolute. He had made enemies of all of his rich friends, in one fell swoop, and the response had been devastating. They all cut him off. Capote always ran in multiple circles at the same time. He hung out with movie people, and actors/actresses, he hung out with (and battled with) the other big writers of the day – Gore Vidal, Norman Mailer – he had many contacts in law enforcement circles, post-In Cold Blood, and was able to gracefully maneuver his way through that macho world in order to get the access he needed for the stories he wanted to write. He was a chameleon, despite his flamboyant openly gay manner. But hanging out with the rich (and not just the rich, but the international billionaire set) was how he got by: they fed him, validated him, his friendships with these people filled up some vast hole of worthlessness he had going on inside. These were not fairweather friends, not at the start: they didn’t just have him around at their parties. They loved him. This is why all of them banishing him to the outer depths was so catastrophic for him. He flattered their vanity about themselves (this was a part of his disarming charm, and it was Marlon Brando’s undoing when he made the disastrous – and yet fortunate, for us – choice to allow himself to be interviewed by Capote). Capote made them feel like they weren’t just shallow upper-crust people, they loved indulging their Bohemian sides. Go party at Studio 54, hang out with Andy Warhol, and then go back to their Upper East Side fortresses. Capote gave them access to a world where they could be cool. Fabulous. To reiterate, because it’s important: his friendships (especially his friendship with Bill and Babe Paley – pictured below at Capote’s famous Black and White ball) were not surface friendships.

They bankrolled him, and took him with them on their Greek island yacht jaunts, allowing him to live a life of luxury closed to most writers, even very successful ones. Bestselling authors, as Capote was, still don’t live the life of an Onassis. That’s a heady club, closed to most of the planet. Capote and Babe Paley were soulmates, best friends. Capote’s companionship helped her deal with her marriage. Capote gave her validation, companionship, humor, fun. Bill Paley was a friend, too. The three of them were inseparable.

All of that changed with the publication of one chapter of Capote’s upcoming novel (never finished), called Answered Prayers. The one notorious chapter was called “La Côte Basque 1965”, and it was published in Esquire in 1979.

Capote had been chattering about the book for years. In Cold Blood had wiped him out. In order for him to finish In Cold Blood, Capote had been forced to wait through all of the appeals until the two murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith, were executed. The wait was excruciating. When Hickock and Smith were hanged, Capote was present. It was such a “shattering” experience for Capote (his word) that I believe he never fully recovered. The book came out and was a smash success. He had been famous since the publication of his first novel, Other Voices, Other Rooms (and also famous because of the overtly sexual author photograph, with Capote reclined across a couch giving the camera a come-to-bed glance), and had had much success, but In Cold Blood brought him to another level. His earlier works had been delicate elegies to his Southern childhood, his family, the memories of growing up a small effeminate boy in a dusty town, and so no one really saw In Cold Blood coming. It was a game-changer, not only for Capote, but for the entire American literary scene. There was an ongoing war between Norman Mailer and Capote over who invented this new form of nonfiction-fiction. Capote got the laurels.

To let off steam, freed by the completion of In Cold Blood, he threw the famous Black and White Ball in New York City, inviting the elite of society – showgirls and heiresses, Mia Farrow and Gloria Vanderbilt – it was a smashing success, making it seem as though hanging out with Truman Capote was the coolest thing one could ever do. People begged and pleaded to get invites to that ball. It was the event of the year.

Everyone wondered what the boy wonder would write next. Years passed.

He worked on films, he published other books, he wrote short stories, but something essential appears to have drained out of him. He could not write another In Cold Blood. Instead, he turned his cold eyes onto his friends, the society people who had been so kind to him. For whatever insane reason, Capote decided to have a little bit of fun at their expense. Nobody had access to their secret echelon of life, but he did. He decided to tell all of their secrets in a lightly fictionalized book, which would be called Answered Prayers. He bragged about the progress of the book to whoever would listen, he hinted coyly to his friends “you’ll be in it, sweetheart”, but he made it sound like whatever he revealed would of course be flattering. How could it be otherwise? He had been hanging out with these people for decades. They thought he liked them.

Only a couple of chapters of Answered Prayers have ever been found, so it seems Capote had been bragging about the book in order to make himself believe he was actually working on it and making progress. Writers need courage to put out a new work, and Capote, battling alcoholism, drug addiction, horrible relationships, and all the rest, needed all the courage he could get. Bragging that the book was almost finished, when, in reality, he had only written 3 chapters, was probably one of the ways he tried to force himself to believe that he “still had it”. It’s tragic. Even more tragic when you actually read Answered Prayers, and you see how THIN it really is. There’s nothing there, not really.

From the great brutal sweep of In Cold Blood, he descended into vicious tale-telling, immaterial, meaningless, who gives a shit, Truman, about your soulless friends. YOU’RE the one who insisted on hanging out with such a despicable crowd (despicable, according to you). Answered Prayers may be a glimpse into a society that very few of us ever get to witness, but it’s hard to care about any of it. These chapters would be his ruin.

The one chapter, “La Côte Basque 1965”, was published in Esquire in 1979. It was like a bomb went off in high society. In a matter of days, Capote found himself exiled. He had hurt people irrevocably. He had told their secrets. He had made them all seem ridiculous and nasty.

It is difficult to understand his motivations, although Gerald Clarke does an excellent job examining the character of Truman Capote and what drove this artist to do what he did. Underneath the love he had for his friends was contempt. He knew, on some level, that they were just “letting him” hang out with them. That, at heart, he was an outcast, always would be an outcast. There was a lot of buried anger in this damaged man, who had been so scorned and underestimated, the victim of such harsh judgment, abandoned by his parents, etc. By deciding to publish “”La Côte Basque 1965”, he decided to kill the only friendships he had.

There had to be a level of self-awareness in his actions, despite his later protests. He had to know what he was doing. He was too smart to not know. But still: he was not prepared for the impact. A couple of friends stayed by his side, but for the most part he was shunned. He didn’t realize how much he loved these people until they all refused to speak to him ever again. Yes, he brought it on himself. But still. Other friends had tried to warn him off, tried to tell him that not only was “”La Côte Basque 1965” not worthy of him, but that the fallout would be extreme. He was convinced otherwise.

He never really regained his footing after 1979.

Capote’s final years were brutal. Gerald Clarke’s book is a masterpiece, because I remember feeling, as I read the final chapters, “Just die already, Truman. It’s okay. You deserve some peace. No more sadness. It’s okay.” I yearned for his release from this cruel life.

Truman Capote went to his grave thinking his “great book” was still unwritten. Thinking of In Cold Blood, I must beg to differ.

I will always cherish him, even Answered Prayers.

Here is an excerpt from the “La Côte Basque 1965” section of Gerald Clarke’s book.

Excerpt from Capote: A Biography

Truman wanted Bill to be aware that he was being ridiculed; otherwise the Sidney Dillon anecdote would have had no purpose. But so confused and contradictory were his thoughts, he also tried to convince himself that neither Bill nor some of the others he had made fun of would recognize themselves. One day in July he took a friend for a swim in Gloria Vanderbilt’s pool in Southampton – Gloria and Wyatt were away in Europe – and after the friend had read his manuscript, Truman identified, one by one, the models for his characters. “But Truman, they’re not going to like this,” protested the friend. Floating on his back and looking up at a sky of cloudless serenity, Truman lazily responded, “Nah, they’re too dumb. They won’t know who they are.”

But they did know, and when “La Côte Basque” reached the stands in mid-October, their wrath shook the ground beneath his feet. The first tremors were felt on October 10, even before it appeared. Learning of her own leading role – someone had smuggled her an advance copy of the November Esquire – Ann Woodward swallowed a fatal dose of Seconal, the same drug that had killed Nina Capote. Ann had been deeply depressed anyway, and “La Côte Basque” may only have been the catalyst that hastened the inevitable. What had bothered Ann most, a weary Elsie Woodward told a friend, was not Truman’s dredging up of the sordid past, but his suggestion that her marriage to poor Bill had been bigamous. Few regretted Ann’s death, in any event; the general feeling was that justice had been served at last. But many were angered by the embarrassment Truman had caused that beloved icon, ninety-two-year-old Elsie, who had spent twenty years trying to make everyone forget the scandal. Now, in a few paragraphs, he had destroyed all her hard work.

When “La Côte Basque” was available to everyone a week later the earthquake itself struck, sending shock waves from New York to California, where Truman was beginning rehearsals for his movie. The reaction was most succinctly summed up by a cartoon on the cover of New York magazine: a French poodle – Truman, complete with glasses – disrupting a formal party with his sharp and rapacious teeth. “Capote Bites the Hands That Fed Him,” read the magazine’s headline, which expressed the shocked and outraged feelings of most of his society friends: their favorite household pet, their ami de la maison, had turned against them.

Within hours, phones were ringing all over the East Side of Manhattan. One of the first callers was Babe, who asked Slim to identify Sidney Dillon. “Who is that?” Babe inquired suspiciously. “You don’t think that it’s Bill, do you?”

“No, I don’t,” answered Slim, who knew very well who Dillon was meant to be – Truman had told her months before. But Babe found out anyway, and instead of accusing Bill of infidelity, she blamed Truman for putting such a distasteful tale into print. Although Truman had studied her with the rapt attention of a lover, he had failed to understand perhaps the most important component of Babe’s character: her loyalty to her family. Brought up to honor the stern Roman virtues of Old Boston, she had different values from many of her fashionable friends, including Slim. She believed, as Peg O’Shea did, that whether or not he had strayed, or whether or not he had humiliated her, a wife’s duty was to stand beside her husband. She was now standing beside Bill. In attacking him, Truman had also attacked her family and the cody by which she lived, and she could not forgive him.

Nor could Slim. “You’re in it, Big Mama,” he had warned her, but expecting no more than a walk-on part, Slim was totally unprepared to encounter herself as the gabby Lady Coolbirth. “When you read it, there’s my voice, my armature, my everything!” she exploded. “She looks like me, she talks like me, she’s me! A mirror image of me! I was absolutely undone when I read it, staggered that he could be sitting across from me at a table and then go home and write down everything I had said. I had adored him, and I was so appalled by the use of friendship and my own bad judgment.”

Others were equally chagrined. “Never have you heard such gnashing of teeth, such cries for revenge, such shouts of betrayal and screams of outrage,” reported Liz Smith, who wrote the article that accompanied the New York cartoon. One cry came from the Logans, who were enraged by his witty gibe about their parties; “that dirty little toad is never coming to my parties again,” declared Nedda. Another came from Gloria Vanderbilt, who vowed that if she ever saw him again, she would spit at him. “After all,” explained her husband Wyatt, “they’ve known each other a long time. It’s not that a secret has been betrayed, it’s that a kind of trust has been betrayed.”

“It’s very hard to be a gentleman and a writer,” Somerset Maugham had said, and in the end Truman had elected to be the latter. He had broken the rules of the club, and he had to be punished. Just as it once had been the fashion to take him up, now it became the fashion to put him down, “the chic of the week,” as Charlotte Curtis phrased it. Those who were not hurt by “La Côte Basque” were often as angry as those who were. Marella Agenelli, who more than once had begged him to be her guest on one Mediterranean cruise or another, could not even bring herself to mention his first name. “Capote despises the people he talks about,” she complained. “Using, using all the time. He builds up his friends privately and knocks them down publicly.” Overnight, doors slammed in his face, and except for a few hardy loyalists like Kay Meehan and C.Z. Guest, who had not been made fun of, his society friends refused to speak to him. Not since Franklin Roosevelt came to power had the rich felt themselves so misused by someone they had considered one of their own. Truman had been accepted, pampered and allowed into the inner recesses of their private lives; in return, he had mocked them and broadcast their secrets. He was, in their opinion, a cad and a traitor.

“In society a great friendship does not amount to much,” was Proust’s cynical observation, and so it seemed to be, as even Cecil, who was eagerly following events from England, rushed to join the pack of Truman-haters. Forgotten were the unblemished days he and Truman had enjoyed together in Tangier, Portofino and Palamos; disregarded the many words of sticky adulation Cecil had scribbled about him in his diary; banished from mind the time Truman had rescued him from the two sailors in Honolulu. After having dedicated most of his life to protecting his place in the front ranks of fashion, Cecil did not want to be left behind now.

Actually, Cecil, whose chief defect was not snobbery, as many assumed, but a consuming envy, had secretly turned against Truman a decade earlier, after the success of In Cold Blood. “The triumph of Truman is salt in one’s wound,” he had bitterly noted in his diary at the end of 1965. The further triumph of the Black and White Ball had inflamed him still more. For ten years he had waited for the weather to change. To Cecil’s envious ears, the howls of indignation he now heard from the other side of the Atlantic were as soothing as a lullaby – Truman’s most venomous enemy could not have taken more delight in his downfall. “I hate the idea of Truman,” he happily confessed to one correspondent. “How low can he sink?” Even Truman’s erstwhile best friend had pronounced his name anathema: there could have been no clearer confirmation that he had been expelled from Olympus.

Naivete may be a necessary armor for writers who, like Truman, closely pattern their fiction on real people and real incidents. How, after all, could they ever write anything if they could foresee what their words would cost them? Only such protective ingenuousness could explain how Thomas Wolfe, for example, could have imagined that his family and friends would not have been wounded by Look Homeward, Angel. Only such deliberate blindness could account for Proust’s surprise when some of his titled friends were offended by their portraits in Remembrance of Things Past. And only such obstinate self-deception could explain the astonishment and dismay with which Truman now watched the reversal in his fortunes that followed “La Côte Basque”.

He had of course hoped to raise the blood pressure of people like the Logans and to cause momentary annoyance to a few more, like Bill Paley and Gloria Vanderbilt. What he had not anticipated was the disaster, complete and absolute, that had now befallen him. Forced to remain in California while he was making his movie, he kept in touch with events from afar. “He was the most surprised and shocked person you can imagine,” recalled Liz Smith, “and he would call to ask me – torment me – about what people in New York had said about him. After ‘La Côte Basque’ he was never happy again.”

Truman Capote Speaks

“Writing has laws of perspective, of light and shade, just as painting does, or music. If you are born knowing them, fine. If not, learn them. Then rearrange the rules to suit yourself. Even Joyce, our most extreme disregarder, was a superb craftsman; he could write Ulysses because he could write Dubliners.”

______________________

“The possession of style, a style, is often a hindrance, a negative force, not as it should be, and as it is – with, say, E.M. Forster and Colette and Flaubert and Mark Twain and Hemingway and Isak Dinesen – a reinforcement. Dreiser, for instance, has a style – but oh, Dio buono! And Eugene O’Neill. And Faulkner, brilliant as he is. They all seem to me triumphs over strong but negative styles, styles that do not really add to the communication between writer and reader. Then there is the styleless stylist – which is very difficult, very admirable, and always very popular: Graham Greene, Maugham, Thornton Wilder, John Hersey, Willa Cather, Thurber, Sartre (remember, we’re not discussing content), J.P. Marquand, and so on. But yes, there is such an animal as a nonstylist. Only they’re not writers; they’re typists. Sweaty typists blacking up pounds of bond paper with formless, eyeless, earless messages.”

______________________

“Flannery O’Connor – she has some fine moments, that girl.”

______________________

“Style has never been a strong point with American writers. This though some of the best have been Americans. Hawthorne got us off to a fine start. For the past thirty years Hemingway, stylistically speaking, has influenced more writers on a world scale than anyone else.”

______________________

“Faulkner, McCullers – they project their personality at once.”

______________________

“Hemingway once said anybody can write a novel in the first person. I know now exactly what he meant.”

______________________

“Call it precious and go to hell, but I believe a story can be wrecked by a faulty rhythm in a sentence – especially if it occurs toward the end – or a mistake in paragraphing, even punctuation. Henry James is the maestro of the semicolon. Hemingway is a first-rate paragrapher. From the point of view of ear, Virginia Woolf never wrote a bad sentence. I don’t mean to imply that I successfully practice what I preach. I try, that’s all.”

______________________

“The test of whether or not a writer has divined the natural shape of his story is just this: After reading it, can you imagine it differently, or does it silence your imagination and seem to you absolute and final? As an orange is final. As an orange is something nature has made just right.”

______________________

“These are the enthusiasms that remain constant: Flaubert, Turgenev, Chekhov, Jane Austen, James, EM Forster, Maupassant, Rilke, Proust, Shaw, Willa Cather – oh the list is too long, so I’ll end with James Agee, a beautiful writer whose death over two years ago was a real loss. Agee’s work, by the way, was much influenced by the films.”

______________________

“Most of all, I believe in hardening yourself against opinion.”

______________________

“Never demean yourself by talking back to a critic, never. Write those letters to the editor in your head, but don’t put them on paper.”

______________________

Norman Mailer:

[Truman Capote] was an extraordinary person. Extraordinary. Not extraordinary in the depth of his intelligence, but extraordinary in his daring. I once made a comment that he was one of the bravest men in New York. And you’ve no idea what it meant to walk around the way he did when he was young. I remember he was living in Brooklyn, and there was a set designer – I think it was Oliver Smith – who had a house about two blocks from where I lived in Brooklyn Heights. Truman lived in the basement there, so we’d run into each other on the street once in a while. One time, when we did, we started walking, and I said, Let’s have a drink, and we went into the nearest bar. It happened to be an old Irishman’s bar. It was one hundred yards long, or so it seemed, and they all had one foot up on the rail, these tough working-class Irishmen, and probably some Scots, all drinking there.

And we walk in, and there’s Truman with the blond hair that he still wore in bangs and he had his little gabardine raincoat. He didn’t have his arms in his sleeves, he had it tucked around his shoulders like a cape. And he walked in, and I walked in behind him and suddenly realized, Oh my God. And we went to the back of the place and sat down and talked for a while, nobody bothered us, but you know it was one of those things where you just didn’t relax for a moment. I figured there could well be trouble before we got out of there. It occurred to me then that Truman lived with that every minute of every day of his life – he insisted on being himself. And he was ready to take on what might happen. I was most impressed by that.

Posted in On This Day, writers | Tagged , | Leave a comment

50 Best Albums, by Brendan O’Malley, #13. The Sex Pistols, Never Mind The Bollocks

My talented brother Brendan O’Malley is an amazing writer and actor. He’s wonderful in the recent You & Me, directed by Alexander Baack. (I interviewed Baack about the film here.) His most recent gig was story editor/writer on the hit series Survivor’s Remorse. Brendan hasn’t blogged in years, but the “content” (dreaded word) is so good I asked if I could import some of it to my blog. He did series on books he loved, and albums he loved. I thought it would be fun to put up some of the stuff here. So we’ll start with his list of 50 Best Albums. I’ll put up one every Monday.

Brendan’s list of 50 Best Albums is part music-critique and part memoir and part cultural snapshot.

I have always loved these essays, because I love to hear my brother talk. I am happy to share them with you!

50 Best Albums, by Brendan O’Malley

13. The Sex Pistols – Never Mind The Bollocks

I don’t know of any other album that more perfectly captures the sense of what a fit of anger feels like.

The Sex Pistols Never Mind The Bollocks album is a work of art so perfectly realized that you can almost be fooled into thinking that it is artless, that it is the pure form of what it expresses. In other words, it so perfectly embodies rage that one could mistakenly label it as merely an after-effect of rage, instead of a masterful evocation of it.

The music industry was so threatened by these guys that they thought they had no choice but to deride this as mere juvenile ranting, the bark and howl of an underclass that is not worth a nickel. They didn’t mind making money off of it but they sure as shit weren’t going to hold it up and say, “This is a flawless work.” Which it is.

In the 32 years since it was released (!?$#?), music has exploded. Rage has become an economic juggernaut. Volume has increased, censorship both implied and explicit has ebbed, and no one is shocked when they encounter uncomfortable topics presented with all the unpleasant details right out front.

But when The Sex Pistols hit the scene, this was far from the case. They were unseemly. They were unruly. They had unabashed scorn for anything that smacked of the establishment. They hated hippies as much as businessmen. The baby boomers who thought their softly strummed odes to fucking while stoned were going to change the world were the biggest resisters to the noise and clamor of these hooligans.

Lost in all of that is a gem of a record. Sid Vicious killed more than a couple of junkies that night in the Chelsea Hotel. He also killed any real chance that The Sex Pistols had to be viewed as anything other than an aberration, instead of a meteor.

Getting back to the changes in the record industry, what strikes me is that, as comfortable as everyone has gotten with rote expressions of anger and disappointment (nü-metal, grunge, rap/rock, gangsta rap, emo-core, etc.), Bollocks puts it all to shame. Even me with my affinity for anger, for loud uncompromising music, even I find myself wanting to tell Johnny Rotten to shut the hell up, to behave, to act like a gentleman. He is relentless in his vocal attack, seeming to rip convention to shreds with every line.

And this clarity extends right into the production of the album itself. This was no mere angry spurt. The sound of that album is like a chainsaw with a grudge. It is as clear as a bell which gives the emotional content even more weight because they aren’t willing to let you escape one second of it via a muddy mix, a muffled drum beat, a garbled lyric. Each musical moment is like a shining dagger headed right for your chest.

Thrilling challenging exasperating alienating incriminating and exterminating. The Sex Pistols killed the 1960’s and it was about the fuck time.

I am almost always angry on a cellular level. Somehow if you were able to test my DNA for rage you’d get an off the charts reading. If you could trace anger itself as an evolutionary force you would slide into the DNA and travel back in time through each scream, each punch, each threat, each explosion. And lo and behold, at the beginning of it all, at the moment that God created anger, you would hear his booming voice in the halls of heaven. He would warn you about the evils of this emotion, how it will warp you and rob you of human connection.

And The Sex Pistols would burst in and say, “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”

— Brendan O’Malley

Posted in Music | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Review: The Death of Dick Long (2019) Hilarious

Directed by one of the guys who brought us the sui generis Swiss Army Man, Death of Dick Long is so funny. It’s old-school funny. Yes, there are so many dick jokes, and the title alone should give you a clue … but most of the humor is situational. I loved it. I reviewed Death of Dick Long for Ebert.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Present Tense: Death Scenes


William Holden, “Sunset Boulevard”

For my next “Present Tense” column at Film Comment, I wrote about a long-time obsession – which I have covered from time to time here on my site: Actors performing death scenes. And a tribute to those who do it really really well.

Death scenes discussed:

Brian Blessed’s hard to top death scene in I, Claudius
Janet Leigh in Psycho
The child dying in the street in Once Upon a Time in America
William Holden in Sunset Boulevard
Marlon Brando in The Godfather
Shirley MacLaine in Some Came Running
Warren Beatty/Faye Dunaway in Bonnie and Clyde
Meryl Streep in Ironweed
Jensen Ackles throughout Supernatural
James Cagney in Roaring Twenties (my #1 favorite death scene)

Posted in Actors, Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Dynamic Duo #19


Linda Manz, Dennis Hopper, Cannes premiere of “Out of the Blue”, 1980

Very exciting news in re: Out of the Blue (which I featured in a recent column on Film Comment): When I wrote the essay, I had come across a Kickstarter raising money to restore this very hard-to-see film. (Next year will be its 40th anniversary.) What I did not know was that it was also going to be shown – three times – at the Venice Film Festival (which just happened last month). My pal Glenn Kenny, who was in Venice reporting on the festival, covered it in one of his dispatches. So looks like this project is moving forward, and picking up steam, with people like Chloe Sevigny and Natasha Lyonne – and me – let’s not forget me – advocating for this brilliant film to be made available again.

I tapped into a zeitgeist without even knowing it. I am so excited that other people will now be able to see this film.

Posted in Actors, Directors | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

50 Best Albums, by Brendan O’Malley, #14. The Rolling Stones, Beggar’s Banquet

My talented brother Brendan O’Malley is an amazing writer and actor. He’s wonderful in the recent You & Me, directed by Alexander Baack. (I interviewed Baack about the film here.) His most recent gig was story editor/writer on the hit series Survivor’s Remorse. Brendan hasn’t blogged in years, but the “content” (dreaded word) is so good I asked if I could import some of it to my blog. He did series on books he loved, and albums he loved. I thought it would be fun to put up some of the stuff here. So we’ll start with his list of 50 Best Albums. I’ll put up one every Monday.

Brendan’s list of 50 Best Albums is part music-critique and part memoir and part cultural snapshot.

I have always loved these essays, because I love to hear my brother talk. I am happy to share them with you!

50 Best Albums, by Brendan O’Malley

14. The Rolling Stones – Beggar’s Banquet

Stones fans will most likely take issue with this choice and I understand. They have better albums. Exile On Main Street is like a time machine. It prefigures about 8 different musical genres. It is like its own cottage industry. Some Girls is probably my favorite with a sound that is like the collective energy that accumulates from every stripper in New York City the split second before they start their burlesque.

But Beggar’s Banquet is the one that came first for me.

In high school, as I’ve repeatedly said, I was a punk. I rejected a lot of the mainstream music I heard, a prejudice which was retroactive to hits of the ’60’s. Anything that wasn’t written and recorded in a teenager’s basement by angry 1980’s punks was a golden oldie for me.

Into that wall of judgment came Beggar’s Banquet. At this point I knew “Jumpin’ Jack Flash” and didn’t like it. I probably knew “Start Me Up” and didn’t like it. And I especially didn’t like “Sympathy For The Devil” which was the ULTIMATE establishment rock song. They played it 3 times a day on the classic rock station. Everyone knew the “woo-woo” bit and everyone over-inflated the depth of the thing itself.

How I wound up with the cassette is a story that has escaped my memory. Why I delved in at all when I considered The Stones to be hopelessly passe…this too has flown into the mists of the past.

I’ll tell you what I do remember.

Our station wagon didn’t have a tape deck so I would pile 27 gigantic batteries into my boom box and tote the thing around with me wherever I went. Usually it held The Replacements, or 7 Seconds, or Minor Threat, or Hüsker Dü, or The Descendents.

But every now and then I’d pop in Beggar’s Banquet. Usually the second side. I have a giant streak of the contrarian in me so ‘Street Fighting Man’ is something of a touchstone.

The ease with which The Stones delve into religious territory while keeping all of their edge and raucousness infuses “Prodigal Son” with, dare I say it, an ecstatic tinge.

“The Stray Cat Blues” is sex on wheels.

“Factory Girl” has a hard-won ramshackle ease that brings to mind a whole neighborhood of good time bars and late night hook-ups.

And then “Salt Of The Earth” shoots a cupid’s arrow through it all, tying it up with a shout out to the collective.

If you’d never heard of The Stones and listened to this album, you might do a jig and say, “At last! Wilco had a few cups of coffee before they recorded for once!” Or maybe “Damn, who knew The Jayhawks could actually write good songs?” Or even “Thank God Ryan Adam finally grew some nuts.”

Point is, this is the best alt-country album of all time and it was recorded 30 years before there was ever a blank dot blank anything.

I must also turn this review back to the personal and admit a deeper reason for my affection for this album. My girlfriend Shannon and I would cruise around the mean streets of South County and crank this sucker. Its echo would still be ringing when I fumbled with her buttons in the parking lot of the Great Swamp under a gorgeous summer night sky.

And that moonlight that visited us, that lit her young beauty from the reaches of outer space, that moonlight, though noiseless, that moonlight sang in my head.

— Brendan O’Malley

Posted in Music | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Ghost on the Sidewalk

Every time I walk by the Warwick Hotel, like I did yesterday, I take a moment to say hello to the ghost on the sidewalk.


2019


1956

Posted in Art/Photography | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

50 Best Albums, by Brendan O’Malley, #15. Rufus Wainwright, Rufus Wainwright

My talented brother Brendan O’Malley is an amazing writer and actor. He’s wonderful in the recent You & Me, directed by Alexander Baack. (I interviewed Baack about the film here.) His most recent gig was story editor/writer on the hit series Survivor’s Remorse. Brendan hasn’t blogged in years, but the “content” (dreaded word) is so good I asked if I could import some of it to my blog. He did series on books he loved, and albums he loved. I thought it would be fun to put up some of the stuff here. So we’ll start with his list of 50 Best Albums. I’ll put up one every Monday.

Brendan’s list of 50 Best Albums is part music-critique and part memoir and part cultural snapshot.

I have always loved these essays, because I love to hear my brother talk. I am happy to share them with you!

50 Best Albums, by Brendan O’Malley

15. Rufus Wainwright – Rufus Wainwright

In a dream we all go to the same sad place to mourn our lost love. How such a place can be so beautiful is maddening to us. We wish we could dream ourselves into some post-apocalyptic barren landscape, scorched earth mirroring the inner wasteland that still serves to beat blood into our extremities. But no. Our subconscious is much crueler than that.

That feeling rises in us, that wave of love which is as pristine as the first moment it rose up to break on our shore. This wave contains every moment of passion, every stolen glance, every small gesture of intimacy, every ecstatic coupling, every tearful reunion, every tragic parting, every shared hilarity, every every every. And that wave washes us, in our dream, up the delta of a bursting river. The salt of the ocean slowly ebbs away and the fresh water takes up our weight. It is as if the tears we shed at the end have been dissolved, brought back to a more primal place.

The river, now free of the bitterness of that terrible end, picks up steam as it rushes backwards away from that all-encompassing wave.

On the shore of this river sit monuments to the failed love, gorgeous statues hewed from whatever rock lay closest at hand, trees whittled into murals, birds preening and singing familiar melodies, flowers clutching stems and trying to hold onto the fragrance that once wafted down and over your entwined limbs.

The river speeds. The detail of the passing banks becomes a bit blurred as you move towards the inevitable. You wish the inevitable were a holocaust made visible, a nightmare of epic proportions. But again, our hearts don’t help us. The easy out of an awful vision is not afforded to us.

The trees blur, the moments mingle, the river speeds. You can’t be going any faster. All of a sudden you stop.

Your dream, the result of your tragic lost love deep in your subconscious, is a waterfall going up. You see fish leap from it and walk away, evolved. Clouds form and elevate. It is the most romantic sight you’ve ever witnessed.

But everything is over. Everything is over.

In that distant dream mist, in that backwards cataract, this album was born. And the scales on the fish that walk out of that impossible river have a vague memory of the one that got away.

If only we could forget so easy.

— Brendan O’Malley

Posted in Music | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment