Review: Beast (2018)

Newcomer Jessie Buckley is a total revelation. Thrillingly alive performance in Beast. Highly recommended.

My review of Beast is now up on Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

From Lillian Gish to James Dean: My Interview with Dan Callahan

I had a lot of fun interviewing Dan Callahan about his new book The Art of American Screen Acting, 1912-1960.

It’s now up at Slant Magazine:

Mystery of Screen Acting: An Interview with Dan Callahan.

Posted in Actors, Books, Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

R.I.P. editor Anne V. Coates

One of the honors of my career thus far was being asked to write the narration (read by Diane Lane) for the tribute reel played at Anne Coates’ Lifetime Achievement Oscar ceremony.

From Lawrence of Arabia to 50 Shades of Grey is a hell of a run. (When asked what she thought of 50 SHADES, she said, “I think it could have been a bit more raunchy.”)

Anne Coates was responsible for one of the most famous cuts in cinema history – which mainly came about because they didn’t have the right technology on site to create the intended dissolve. But when director David Lean and Coates saw the cut, they thought: “Is there any reason we CAN’T just leave as is?”

And then, AFTER that famous cut, comes an equally famous dissolve, from the sun rise to the dunes:

Speaking of Lawrence of Arabia, another startling choice was in the almost as famous entrance of Omar Sharif’s character:

David Lean, an editor himself, said that Anne Coates was the only editor he worked with where he saw her first pass on a sequence and didn’t want to change anything because it was how he would have done it.

In my humble opinion, her editing of the romantic sequence in Out of Sight is a masterpiece. Sexual tension made manifest. The tension is in the performances for sure, but the cutting helps it land. Because, as you notice, there’s no sex. But it is as sexy as it gets, due to how they cut, and use flash-forwards to see where the characters are going. There was a lot of discussion between Coates and Soderbergh on putting together this sequence.

Watch this clip here of The Elephant Man. Watch for what comes at around the 1:30 mark.

There are a couple of things that are so masterful here. We get glimpses of the “elephant man” but it is in that excruciatingly slow push-in to Hopkins’ face where the empathy is born. (This is also masterful because Hopkins’ one trembling tear falls just as the camera gets at its closest vantage point. Genius.) Stella Adler always used to say (and it’s a difficult thought, people resist it): “Talent is in the choice.” I think there’s a lot of truth in it. True talent is revealed in the choices an artist makes. This is an amazing choice. She said repeatedly that so much of her work came from an actor’s performance. Good actors create a rhythm – the rhythm is already present. She was known as an actor’s editor. She didn’t make unnecessary cuts. She was about the performance. And so here, with Hopkins – there was not only no need to cut back and forth between the elephant man and Hopkins’ face – such cutting would ruin what was happening in Hopkins’ performance.

Coates’ work is so legendary and so respected, Scorsese cast her as an editor in THE AVIATOR, briefly seen going through a mountain of film, wearing a teal-green/silver dress.

Attention must be paid.

“In a way, I’ve never looked at myself as a woman in the business. I’ve just looked at myself as an editor.”

Rest in peace.

Posted in Movies, RIP | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: RBG (2018)

Here’s my review on Ebert for the new documentary about Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Open Thread: Supernatural, new ep, season winding down

I said on Twitter earlier this week that if I see one more scene of everyone sitting around in the bunker eating leftovers …

And how did this episode open?

I wanted to shake my hands at the heavens shouting “STOP!”

So I have huge issues with the very CONCEPT of the alternate universe. I also have huge issues with Mary Winchester’s false eyelashes and heavy eyeshadow in the alternate universe.

And the sex scene early in the episode … what the HELL?? It was so “out there” stylistically – it was like I was suddenly watching a low-budget 1960s orgy-comedy. So unlike the Supernatural house style – but honestly, since their recent love affair with automatic weapons/camo/gear/SWAT-teams has taken over the show since Season 12, I welcomed the break in style. It was silly as hell – didn’t really work – it was totally juvenile (Laying Pipe??) – but honestly, I prefer “juvenile” to “self-serious machoness” so I’ll take it.

Jensen Ackles knows how to act.

In case anyone missed that memo. His almost childlike whimper when he tried to push past Castiel in the cave to go after Sam … it’s details like that that separates the men from the boys in this industry.

How do we feel about Dean agreeing to leave Sam behind? I’m conflicted. It had some good results though: it ruined the reunion with Mary, Dean being like “Hey Mom, good to see you, gotta go back and get Sam’s body.” Guy can never ever get a break. It got to me.

Pretty sure the powers-that-be heard our howling complaints in re: Sam’s blase non-reaction to being in the presence of Lucifer at the end of Season 11. Now they’re back to at least ACKNOWLEDGING Sam’s trauma of his time in the cage being abused and tortured and raped. Thank you. Although the fact that you would FORGET Sam’s history in that regard is … what’s the word … ridiculous? At any rate, Jared was wonderful at showing the pure terror at even the MENTION of Lucifer’s name.

I am beginning to understand that Samantha Smith is a limited actress and as long as she was called upon to play Mary in small flashbacks we didn’t notice. Now, though, we – or at least I – notice. She’s flat. Mary was mythical, as long as we didn’t see her all that much. And since they didn’t seem interested in piercing the myth of Mary – at least not in ways which would have been fascinating character-wise for Sam and Dean – the whole thing has come off as a non-event. I look at her face, wondering: WHAT is she FEELING? This isn’t because the character is ambiguous or ambivalent. It’s because there’s not much going on in the actress. It hurts me to say this because I dislike criticizing actors. But it’s glaringly obvious to me.

This does not excuse the Season 12 handling of Mary. There are many MANY ways to “work with” an actor’s limitations. Her flat-ness could have been used in multiple ways, to suggest – frighteningly – Mary’s ambivalence about having children, maybe? How horrible would THAT be? Mary’s clear preference of Dean, because of her guilt about Sam? I mean, they SORT of acknowledge that, but not as hard-hitting as they could. They could have recognized Smith’s limitations and made it a character-thing, rather than hoping we don’t notice she just isn’t … THERE onscreen, especially not when side by side with the two powerhouse actors playing her sons.

Anyway, these are my initial thoughts.

Posted in Television | Tagged , , | 103 Comments

For Film Comment: On Mary Ellen Bute’s 1966 Passages from James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake

Well, this is a piece I was born to write. I can’t believe it came along. It was offered to me, too. That’s the weird thing. I got the assignment in January and immediately began a re-read of Finnegans Wake. I finished it in April. Meanwhile, I was researching Mary Ellen Bute, one of the most gratifying aspects of this entire project. I knew nothing about her. It was so much fun getting to know her and seeing her films (the ones available to be seen, that is). I rarely write stuff where I wish my Dad could read it. But this is one of those essays. So Dad gets a shout-out, of course.

You can pick it up at your local bookstore, but this one’s online too.

The River’s Roar: Mary Ellen Bute’s Passages from James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake.

You can check out the rest of the issue here.

Posted in Books, James Joyce, Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

April 2018 Viewing Diary

Elvis Presley: The Searcher (2018; d. Thom Zimny)
New 2-part HBO doc about Elvis. Grateful it exists now. Long overdue artistic redress. I reviewed for Ebert.

Morvern Callar (2002; d. Lynne Ramsay)
Re-watched in preparation for her latest, You Were Never Really Here. Ramsay is my kind of film-maker. I didn’t like We Need To Talk About Kevin (mainly because the book feels almost un-adaptable), but it’s certainly in her wheelhouse of alienation, disaffected characters, gaps in the narrative line. Samantha Morton is so great in this.

You Were Never Really Here (2018; d. Lynne Ramsay)
In love with this film. My review at Ebert.

Elvis (1968; d. Steve Binder)
The 1968 “comeback special.” Still so “out there” you kind of can’t believe it even happened.

Elvis: That’s the Way It Is (1970; d. Denis Sanders)
An excellent backstage-rehearsal-and-concert film about Elvis putting together his Las Vegas show, under enormous pressure. He’s young(ish), lean, funny, and completely professional (you can really see how he was the ultimate producer of all of this. Nobody told Elvis what to do.) As hard as Elvis works, the real truth comes on opening night, when Elvis sits backstage looking through all the cards sent to him, and you can see it hit him: nerves, butterflies, vertigo. He looks up, around, and whistles, like “Hoo boy, I’m nervous.” Then of course he triumphs.

Passages from James Joyce’s “Finnegans Wake” (1966; d. Mary Ellen Bute)
There are all of these people on Twitter right now comparing Infinity War to “experimental film” which just makes me think these people can’t have seen many experimental films. At any rate, Mary Ellen Bute was a pioneering and truly experimental animator, whose lifelong obsession was finding a way to make a film based on passages from James Joyce’s nocturnal-dreamstate book Finnegans Wake. In 1966, she finally did so. I’ll have more to say about this.

Aardvark (2018; d. Brian Shoaf)
It just doesn’t work. My review for Ebert.

Supernatural, Season 13, episode 17, “The Thing” (2018; d John Showalter)
Had some good points. Good final scene. But … not sure about where they’re going with Men of Letters. I am so happy the Men of Letters of Season 12 are no more (except for Ketch, which, okay I’ll allow it) – because they were AWFUL – but … I don’t know, is THIS the way to explore the Men of Letters? I think the Men of Letters have outlived their usefulness, and I realize I say that mainly because my mantra for two years now has been The Bunker Has Got to Go.

Magic Trip (2011; d. Alex Gibney, Alison Ellwood)
Having just tore through Tom Wolfe’s The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test (how on earth had I not read it before?), this documentary is, of course, the next step. The footage is not all that good, but Gibney is to be congratulated for shaping a narrative out of what apparently was thousands of hours of footage. Or, hundreds. Whatever. PILES of random badly-shot footage. But here, we do get a sense of the bus-trip, but maybe not … why? And … again, why are they doing this? Kesey is magnetic onscreen. There’s a fascinating glimpse of Kerouac, who shows up at a party with the Pranksters in New York, and he is sitting on the couch, gulping down a can of beer, not really INTO all the hippie-dippie tambourine-shaking flower-kid speed-freaks all around him. He’s so handsome. And Neal Cassady … the Erotic Muse of two generations of artists? He’s nothing less than fascinating but – judging from his behavior – it is not at all surprising he wouldn’t survive the decade.

Big City Blues (1932; d. Mervyn LeRoy)
A pre-Code story of innocence corrupted in the Big City. Joan Blondell plays what is obviously a prostitute, a kind-hearted one who recognizes the innocence of the young man she’s basically been hired to “grift”, and actually falls for him a little bit. Just a little bit, though. When a party goes spectacularly wrong, she is out the door. I loved this girl, sitting in the middle of the party reading this book. She hesitated before going to the next party, and someone said, “You can bring your book.”

Supernatural, Season 13, episode 4 “The Big Empty” (2017; d. John Badham)
A re-watch. It was a half-hearted attempt to try to align myself with the arc of the season. I keep getting confused. Terrific scene in the grief counselor’s office. I felt excited: WOW, they’re really DEALING with Mary, with her mixed signals, how she ignored Sam, relied on Dean. And yet the rest of the season has not capitalized on this scene. What is going ON over there?

Occupied, Season 1, episode 1 “April” (2015; d. Erik Skjoldbjærg)
A television series from Norway which has pissed off the Kremlin (GOOD.) It’s about Russia’s “soft” invasion of Norway. I only watched the pilot but was very intrigued and do want to get back to it.

The Last Days of Disco (1998; d. Whit Stillman)
Whit Stillman, man … Each one of his films is a classic of its kind. He’s one of the only writer-directors who requires actors who can do his “style.” He would SINK actors who can’t handle his dialogue. It’s almost like Restoration comedy. It requires a style. If you can’t do it, you can’t do it. You have to hear it in your head, you have to align yourself with the intentions of the writer. You can’t just “feel” things and do your own thing. It won’t work. Stillman requires that kind of rigor. Kate Beckinsale is “his” kind of actress. (Her performance in Love and Friendship … I cannot even describe how challenging such a role would be for 99.999% of all actresses, but her? It’s like she was born to it.) Stillman is so good on “nostalgia.” He goes at it in different ways. If you’re not familiar with his work (and … how would that be possible?) it may seem “arch” or self-conscious. But that’s the characters, not him. He’s a historian of different eras, what people long for, the hopelessness of longing, the intellectual systems set up by human beings, artificial constructs in which we behave. Stillman is unique. Nobody else like him. I have always loved this movie.

Mercury 13 (2018; d. David Sington and Heather Walsh)
I loved this new documentary about the astronaut-training program for women back in the 1960s. I reviewed for Ebert.

Where Is Robert Fisher? (2011; d. Charlie Minn)
Some true-crime doc I tripped over on Netflix. Guy was clearly a sociopath.

Supernatural, Season 13, episode 5 “Advanced Thanatology” (2017; d. John F. Showalter)
1. So far, the MOTW episodes have been far better than the “season Arc” episodes. Case in point …
2. I liked how the majority of the episode took place on that set. It was a very good set.
3. I also liked Billie’s “office.”
4. Sam trying to cheer Dean up … eh. Didn’t really care for it. It was thin. Shallow. Manufactured “brother melodrama.” I don’t know. It was “off” for me.
5. Jensen’s hangover was masterfully done. Seriously. I could feel how dehydrated he was. I felt dehydrated myself looking at him.
6. Intriguing detail: Dean carries around what is basically a suicide pack? Just in case? Yet another intriguing detail not really explored outside this particular episode. BAH.

The Fugitive (1993; d. Andrew Davis)
What an absolute blast, seeing this at Ebertfest. Total treat to have the director Andrew Davis in attendance for a QA afterwards.

Selena (1997; d. Gregory Nava)
One of the most purely emotional screenings of the entire festival. Mitchell and I made spectacles of ourselves. Gregory Nava stayed for the entire festival. Such a nice man. We ended up having lunch with him, where we learned he truly believes Bette Davis “killed her husband”. He seemed truly convinced. One of those completely random moments Ebertfest is so great at providing.

Belle (2013; d. Amma Asante)
Another great screening at Ebertfest, a film I adored when I first saw it. This time, it packed even more of a punch because I was sitting with Mitchell, and he had never seen it before.

Columbus (2017; d. Kogonada)
One of my favorite films of last year. Here’s my review for Ebert. Since I had only seen it streaming on my laptop, it was a huge thrill to see it on that huge screen. The film is extraordinary, visually. And the visuals add to the intensity of the emotions. Great QA after.

A Page of Madness (1926; d. Teinosuke Kinugasa)
Every year, Ebertfest features a silent film, accompanied by the three-man Alloy Orchestra. This year, it was a silent film from Japan. Wrote about it here.

13th (2016; d. Ava DuVernay)
With Ava present for the QA, the screening of her Netflix documentary 13th (about the 13th Amendment, and its pesky little loophole), was one of the hot tickets of Ebertfest.

Daughters of the Dust (1991; d. Julie Dash)
A high point of Ebertfest for me was getting to interview Julie Dash onstage following the screening of her groundbreaking 1991 film Daughters of the Dust.

Rambling Rose (1991; d. Martha Coolidge)
Mitchell and I saw this in 1991. We drove over to a theatre in Newport, RI, where it was playing and then stayed up half the night talking about it. Mostly Duvall. But about the film as a whole. So it was perfect that Mitchell was there with me at Ebertfest, to see it again. Neither of us had seen it since 1991. It’s just as good as we remembered.

The Big Lebowski (1998; d. Ethan Coen, Joel Coen)
Not my favorite Coen brothers movie, but still, a lot of fun. It played on Saturday night and the real-life “Dude” – was there. He had been there for the whole festival. He’s … not charming. The theatre was packed with Lebowski fans. Bridges is great. Goodman is great. I love the musical numbers. Although the cult status of this film in particular is baffling to me (well, not really: it’s a validation/celebration of adult male adolescence), it was fun to see it that huge. I miss Ben Gazzara. Mitchell had never seen it before. He liked it. We left before the QA, though, because we had had … just about enough of the real live Dude.

Supernatural, Season 13, episode 18, “Bring ‘Em Back Alive” (2018; d. Amyn Kaderali)
A mixed bag. Ketch saying “Good lad, good lad” to Dean was the most unexpected moment, and I liked it a lot. (This is a meaningful statement from me since I want Ketch to go away, in general.) This episode does one of those rare things I like (and has happened a couple of times this season): Start out with one mission, that mission gets derailed by something totally random, and the episode closes out with the initial mission put off, thwarted. It’s a chaotic approach to narrative but boy do I appreciate that after so many plot-driven episodes. For me, the takeaway, is the white winter light shining on Jensen’s face. How startling an image it was. It was good to see Charlie, although the Alternate Universe is … problematic, for me. Not into it. And what is great about Charlie is not that she’s some badass warrior (soooooo over this, and soooooo over “bad-ass” being the Best Compliment you can give a female character. It’s just as limiting as any other kind of label.) What is great about Charlie is her BRAIN, her humor, her ingenuity, her HUMANITY. This felt “pandering” to me.

Make Way For Tomorrow (1937; d. Leo McCarey)
One of the saddest movies ever made. As per Orson Welles. I agree. I was a wreck. Wrote about it here.

Kodachrome (2018; d. Mark Raso)
This just premiered on Netflix. It’s the kind of small movie – imperfect, but engaging, with good acting from the basically STARS who are the leads – that used to get a theatrical release. Now Netflix scoops it up. And Netflix barely advertises, outside of the stuff THEY produce. So something like this small movie gets lost in the shuffle. Nobody’s even heard of it. Critics have reviewed it, but other than that, Netflix does not advertise for the movies it’s scooping up. It’s becoming a bigger and bigger problem, especially as superhero Marvel movies take up more and more space in the culture – movies that barely NEED advertising. And so small movies take up even less space. At any rate, I watched this, and it’s cliched in some respects, but unique in others. I enjoyed it. And I love the three leads, Ed Harris, Jason Sudeikis and Elizabeth Olsen.

Disobedience (2018; d. Sebastián Lelio)
There’s a lot that’s good here. It didn’t quite reach the level of devastating romance for me – as many audience members seem to be feeling (and that’s fine. Different people have different opinions, jeez Louise), but I liked a lot of it. I love Lelio’s interest in women. This is basically the third movie in a row dealing with women. All different kinds of women. So I’ll always be interested in what he has to say. I reviewed for Ebert.

The Handmaid’s Tale, Season 2, episode 1 “June” (2018; d. Mike Barker)
Now that we’re beyond the scope of Atwood’s book … how can I say this? We’ve moved into something akin to torture porn. A little bit too in love with the horror. A drawn-out execution sequence (with Kate Bush’s “This Woman’s Work” as accompaniment … like: Could you be more self-indulgent?) Sorry. I know people were flipping out about that sequence. And I’m happy for them for responding to it. But my heart is dead and I’m a bitch. I wasn’t totally unmoved – the entire series LOOKS good. And I loved the use of a tumbleweed-y Fenway Park as the execution site. Very effective. But … stuff is getting draaaaaawn out now. Margaret Atwood’s book is as tight and perfectly constructed as a diamond. It could cut glass. It’s compact, its flat tone accentuates the horror. At any rate, I’ll keep watching. Everyone’s really good in it. There’s a great scene at the hospital, where “June” is questioned about her home life. It’s chilling. An effective invented scene. But I’m already kind of chagrined at the shift in tone.

The Handmaid’s Tale, Season 2, episode 2 “The Unwomen” (2018; d. Mike Barker)
Alexis Bledel is very VERY good. But there’s a simplistic vibe here, especially in its treatment of Marisa Tomei’s character. (I love her so much.) Or perhaps it’s just me being cranky. I will cop to that. In such a world, all women are victims, even the ones at the top. Her hanging on to her religious adulation is just as tragic as anything else, especially since her religious beliefs have not protected her at all. Patriarchy hurts everyone, not just the “outlaws”. Even saying that will bring on howls of outrage. But … Atwood’s book makes it very clear the double-bind women are put in, even the Commander’s Wives. (Okay, maybe not the “Aunts” who finally are given some power – which they promptly abuse.) However: once again, the imaginative creation of this world – the “colonies”, the crowded airport … all very very good. And let’s hear it for Clea Duvall. I’m not sure she’ll show up any more (although I hope she will). I was very moved by their relationship, by the confusion, the horror, the goodbyes. Much of this works. But unquestioning raves aren’t my thing. I like to examine what works, what doesn’t. I am perfectly fine with people disagreeing with me.

Supernatural, Season 13, episode 19 “Funeralia” (2018; d. Nina Lopez-Corrado)
What the hell with Rowena? What are they doing with this character? Is this because fans love her? Maybe because she’s a big draw at the conventions? I do not get it. And I do not get what is happening. There isn’t a thru-line, that I can see anyway. Sam’s willingness to believe in her hasn’t been made clear – the scene in the car? Okay. But … I’m still not feeling it. Much will probably be revealed on a re-watch. I’ll hold my judgment. I’m almost as sick of Rowena as I am the bunker.

Investigation Discovery documentary on Golden State Killer (2017)
Okay, so, I had a long layover in O’Hare on my way home from Ebertfest. I had finished The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test on my flight OUT to Illinois so I was book-less. I splurged and bought Michelle McNamara’s book I’ll Be Gone in the Dark, which I’ve been dying to read. I read the entire thing in 24 hours. My friend Allison is so obsessed with the case, she’s printing out maps from Google Earth, and cross-checking police reports, etc. It’s a pure fluke that the murderer/rapist was arrested just one day after I finished the book. Crazy!

RBG (2018; d. Betsy West, Julie Cohen)
New documentary about Ruth Bader Ginsburg. I’m reviewing for Ebert.

Barcelona (1994; d. Whit Stillman)
So wonderful. So thoughtful. So itself. Stillman is one of those rare directors who really has something to say. But the WAY he says it … it’s not a “message movie.”

Supernatural, Season 13, episode 20 “Unfinished Business” (2018; d. Richard Speight Jr.)
Gabriel’s desire for revenge was talked about too much. I lost the plot. Too much talking. (For Speight too, who had clearly lost his voice, playing a double role AND directing, which requires constant talking.) Good final scene, although a re-hash of issues I felt had been sufficiently covered in Season 9. Isn’t there some OTHER internal conflict between the brothers? Off the top of my head I can think of 4, maybe 5. NEW conflicts. To show character development, progression. In general, I’m happier with this season than last season, but that’s not really saying much. I’m still feeling a lack of interest in our main guys. Mary’s return has done nothing for the show, and I can’t believe I’m even saying that! When they say “Mom” now it has no meaning. It’s so upsetting.

48 Hours, “The Golden State Killer” (2017; d. Rob Klug)
Continuing on with my interest in this case. It’ll be very interesting to see what else has turned up, how they put it together. Also, what the hell this monster has been doing for the last 30 years.

The Confession (1970; d. Costa-Gavras)
Beautifully paranoid. Excruciating to watch. Wonderful performances from Yves Montand, Simone Signoret, and Gabriele Ferzetti. There’s one moment when all of the accused, after receiving the death penalty, start crying out for their interrogators. “Where’s my interrogator?” “Where’s my interrogator?” They look like children. These interrogators have tortured them for months. But there’s a bond there. A Stockholm Syndrome bond. It’s so ugly. Great film.

The Twilight Zone, Season 4, episode 8 “Miniature” (1963; d. Walter Grauman)
Such a good performance by a young-ish Robert Duvall, as a lonely strange man, living at home with his mother, who becomes convinced a wooden doll in a Victorian-era dollhouse at a local museum is alive. He falls in love with her. Terrific all around. Creepy and haunting and sad.

Posted in James Joyce, Monthly Viewing Diary, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Everybody Breaks, Bro: Costa-Gavras’ The Confession

The fourth shot in Costa-Gavras’ excruciating film The Confession.

If Robert Conquest explained the machinations behind the Soviet show trials in the 1930s in The Great Terror, and if, in Darkness at Noon, Arthur Koestler walked you through the the process of making a man not only confess to a crime he didn’t commit, but then embrace his own humiliation and willingly grovel before the authorities … then Costa-Gavras actually theatricalizes the entire charade from beginning to end – which seems like it would be impossible to pull off (at least, it seems impossible if you know even a little bit about the topic – which … yeah, if you’ve been around these parts long, you know I do.) The intellectual slipperiness of those show trials was so important – the facade, the knowledge it all was fake, but this was The Process, the ideological component of these inter-Party arguments, and how ideology then led to the Purges, the dizzying confusion of the labels (“Trotskyite” “Zionist” “anarchist”) … how do you make ANY of this clear? But the confusion is part of the interrogation process. And all the actors are so good here, the script, the scene work, all so good, you follow it, realizing what he is being forced to admit to, incrementally, as the weeks of his imprisonment and torture break him down. He won’t confess all at once. You have to walk him through it, step by step. The longer the film goes on – and it’s a long film – the more disorienting it is. Yves Montand is superb, as a big-wig in the Party, a true believer, who is slowly … slowly … broken down to confess to being a traitor, a spy, etc., even though none of it is true. Based on true events. The film is difficult to watch. While the film is exquisitely edited, the story itself takes no shortcuts. Halfway through, you are ACHING for Montand to be allowed to sleep. Masterful editing, even more masterful camera-work. It’s a cliche but: they don’t make ’em like this anymore. Although, come to think of it: They don’t make ’em like this in general.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ebertfest Day 4: Rambling Rose, with director Martha Coolidge

The screening of Rambling Rose requires a longer essay, which I will write when I am not so busy. Martha Coolidge was at the Fest to present her film, a movie Mitchell and I saw in its first release in Rhode Island. After we saw the movie back then, we went out and had a HUGE conversation about it, a conversation we still remember.

Robert Duvall has a moment in the film I’ve always considered his best work (and that’s saying something, when you think of his career). During that conversation a million years ago, Mitchell broke the moment DOWN, describing how it operated, the layers of it, how Duvall went deep in the first phase of the moment, and then he went deeper, and then finally he went to the core, the core of himself, and in there there is shame, and guilt, and love, and pain … The moment happens TO him. He doesn’t “act” it. He ENDURES it.

At any rate, I was determined to ask her a question about that moment, and I did. And her ANSWER … The second they moved on from her answer to the next question I looked at Mitchell, who was sitting there in tears (we made spectacles of ourselves throughout the festival), and he whispered, “That was the most satisfying answer to a question EVER.” We were in awe. We then whispered excitedly to one another about all the new information we had received about this moment we have been talking about for almost THIRTY YEARS.

She gave us anecdotes, she gave us her plan for filming that moment, she told us how “Bobby” wanted to do it, and the effect that had on Diane Ladd, how they broke up the scene in order to GET to that moment … It was a generous and detailed and process-oriented answer and so revelatory about Duvall. How well he knows his own instrument.

I thought I was in an alternate universe, especially since Mitchell and I saw this film together in 1991, had a hugely profound conversation about that moment of Duvall’s, and then so many years later, I get to ask a question about that moment – and Mitchell happens to be sitting next to me? Cosmic tumblers clicking down …

It was maybe the most satisfying moment of the festival for me. For us. The two weeping excited people in the 3rd row, who have been best friends since we were teenagers, talking about acting with the same enthusiasm now as we did then.

Posted in Directors, Movies | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Review: Disobedience (2018)

I reviewed Disobedience for Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment