R.I.P. drummer Honey Lantree

Even now, a “girl drummer” in an all-boy band is a rare thing. Back in the 1960s, it was unheard of. Which is why Honey Lantree, drummer for the Joe Meek-produced The Honeycombs, stands out. Still. Lantree just died at the age of 75. When she joined the band, she was working as a hairdresser. She had never played the drums before, but she took to it. She learned quickly. People refused to even believe it. People thought she was “pretending” drumming to a track already laid down. I know, it’s outrageous.

I wrote a tiny bit about The Honeycombs’ biggest hit – “Have I the Right?” – here. It was #1 in the UK, and #5 in the United States. The Honeycombs didn’t “go the distance” as a band, they were a one-hit wonder, but people still remember that song. It’s an ear-grabber for sure.

Interestingly enough, just last month Honey Lantree came up in a discussion on Facebook. Someone linked to the Elvis talk I gave in Memphis, in which I referenced the absolutely BONKERS final moment of Spinout. Someone in the comments section, a woman, posted a picture of Elvis’ “band” in Spinout, all boys, with – a girl drummer. A spunky sassy one-of-the-boys girl drummer.

I said, in response, “Hey, it’s like The Honeycombs” and the woman who posted the Spinout pic said, “The girl drummer in Spinout and Honey Lantree inspired me as a kid to become a drummer.” Karen Carpenter also said that when she saw The Honeycombs on The Ed Sullivan Show, it inspired her to become a drummer.

One-hit wonder? Okay. But you never know “how far that little candle throws his beams.”

R.I.P. Honey Lantree.

Here are The Honeycombs performing “Have I The Right?”:

Posted in Music, RIP | 4 Comments

Fosse/Verdon: first teaser trailer

Starring Sam Rockwell as Bob Fosse and Michelle Williams as Gwen Verdon. I’ve been excited about this since I first heard it was happening last year, and here’s the first glimpse.

I’m so psyched about this that I’m almost scared. Intensity of anticipation means a high risk of disappointment. But I LOVE that state. That’s what art and entertainment are all about. RISKS. EMOTIONS.

Watching that trailer, you see glimpses of everything – moments from All That Jazz, Cabaret … the dance Fosse and Verdon did in Damn Yankees … and it’s looking … pretty damn good, I have to say.

Posted in Television | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Review: Communion (2019; directed by Anna Zamecka)

This Oscar-contending documentary from Polish filmmaker Anna Zamecka is amazing, even more so considering it is her first film. It opens today.

I reviewed Communion for Rogerebert.com.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Review: Into Invisible Light (2019; directed by Shelagh Carter)

“Do you ever feel your life just veered off somewhere?” – Helena Grayson, Into Invisible Light

In her first film, Passionflower, Winnipeg-based filmmaker Shelagh Carter delved into her own past. Seen through the watchful eyes of young Sarah (Kassidy Love Brown), Passionflower depicts a childhood shadowed by an advertising-agent father (Darcy Fehr) and a mother (Kristen Harris), who is rapidly deteriorating with an undiagnosed and unnamed mental illness. Sarah absorbs it all: her parents’ marital strife, the mercurial pendulum-swing of her mother’s behavior, the isolation of growing up in a house with a mad mother. The film takes place in the Mad Men era of ad-men and cocktail parties, tail-finned cars and frustrated women, and Carter’s film shows the maelstrom of confusing influences bombarding the child’s psyche. It was an impressive debut. (I interviewed Carter about Passionflower, and I also interviewed lead actress Kristen Harris.) Carter’s second feature was the award-winning and emotionally harrowing Before Anything You Say, starring, again, Darcy Fehr and Kristen Harris as a married couple locked in mortal combat. Although other characters appear, this is a two-person show, with the back-and-forth of buried resentments coming to the surface, old hurts, fears of abandonment, secrets and lies. (I interviewed Carter about Before Anything You Say, for which she won Best Director at the International Filmmaker Festival of World Cinema, Berlin, as well at the International Filmmaker Festival of World Cinema, Milan.)

Carter’s third feature, the melancholic Into Invisible Light, has a large cast (larger than her other two films), and is a puzzle-piece film about the dreams and desires, hopes and disappointments of a group of characters with intersecting relationships and fraught past involvements. The central character is Helena Grayson, played by the superb Jennifer Dale (who also co-wrote the script with Carter). Helena is a recent widow, now in charge of the artistic endowment established by her late husband. She feels unqualified to walk in her husband’s footsteps. Her enforced engagement with art, sculpture, dance, writing, picking and choosing the candidates for consideration, brings up old ambitions, and memories of her own writing, done long ago before marriage and its complications seemingly obliterated all that. She had thought she “put away childish things”. Michael (Peter Keleghan) teaches literature at a local university, and is married to a woman who protects her independence ferociously, going off on hiking trips for weeks on end, leaving him to single-parent their teenage daughter Monica (Jaydee-Lynn McDougall), a dance student hopeful for a scholarship handed out by the aforementioned artistic endowment. Years ago, lifetimes ago, Michael and Helena had a romance, young people bound together by their love of words and writing, and support of one anothers’ young dreams.

These four characters are at the center of the intricate and thoughtful script.

Accompanied by Shawn Pierce’s beautiful original score, a haunting piano which infuses the film with an elegiac yearning, Carter explores the past and present of these intense characters, using a variety of arresting stylistic choices.

Cinematographer Ousama Rawi (who also shot Before Anything You Say) has an intuitive sense of space and light, showing Helena strolling through ornate offices and gigantic museums, the surrounding space and high ceilings making this prickly powerhouse look lost and defenseless, in stark contrast to her competent and verbally intimidating persona.

One of the components of Into Invisible Light is its melding of past and present, Helena flowing backwards into the past (shot in dreamy black-and-white, black-and-white with a dark greenish-blue tint), where white curtains billow, where her mother lies dying, where her family stands around a grave, where her hand hovers over a pen on her desk. These are poetic thematic choices, highlighting the Chekhovian elements of the script. Chekhov, in plays like The Three Sisters, The Cherry Orchard, Uncle Vanya, wrote about people caught in the past, bubbles of life trapped in amber, with no way out except through their long-held dreams. Helena and Michael re-enter their old relationship, awkward and fumbling, and yet passionate, the feelings still intense, as though no time has passed at all. Meanwhile the teenage Monica is shown again and again in a rehearsal studio, launching her body in dramatic slo-mo across the space, arms flung out, head thrown back … visual sequences of depth and power. And yet Monica is vulnerable too. She has been abandoned by the adults meant to protect her. (There are a couple of extremely frightening scenes showing the consequences of this abandonment.)

The intense – even fraught – flashbacks emanate from Helena’s unconscious, from her memory, interrupting her present, filling her mind’s eye and heart (similar to the way flashbacks are used in Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman.) Things Helena had assumed were dead in her, things she had buried long ago, arise. Some of the things are terrible, and some tremble with beauty and fragile hope. Dale navigates this with assurance, Helena’s glamorous competent exterior, but also what the exterior is designed to cover up. There’s a wonderful scene where she joins Michael at a quiet club, with wood-paneled walls and leather armchairs, and over the course of their conversation she has too much to drink. Her mask falls away. She wants him. She wants him now, she is lonely, but she also wants him because he reminds her of who she was back then, with him. This scene is beautifully played by Dale. Drawn to Michael again, drawn to literature again through him, she starts to feel the ground beneath her feet once more, all while her past still rises, the constant presence of long white curtains billowing around her as she moves back into memory.

The best way I can put it is that Into Invisible Light is a movie for grownups. It’s not about the first flush of hope. It’s a movie about flawed human people with some miles on them, miles where things have been dropped along the way, things they all thought were lost forever. The dialogue is spiky sometimes, and also really fun to listen to. It’s a relief to sink into a script confident in its different voices, feeling no obligations towards kitchen-sink realism. These are articulate people, devoted to language. They use language to deflect, to camouflage. There’s a real script here, and each scene creates its own intense little microcosm. There’s momentum in the plot, to be sure, but the plot is not really “the thing.” What is “the thing” here is a mood, a vibe, an overall style meant to call up emotions and thoughts and memories. This is difficult to pull off, without seeming precious or like the film is tiptoeing around committing, to nailing things down. Carter collaborates well with Rawi (and they are aided in their work by talented editor Chad Tremblay, who won Best Editing at the Madrid International Film Festival for Before Anything You Say). The music ties the whole thing together, grounding it and yet also setting it free.

When Monika launches herself across the dance floor, lost in her creativity, in her expression, watched by Helena, the childless Helena, there’s an emotional impact flowing from all that came before, flowing without pushing, pieces of the puzzle put together gently, and yet still … still … imperfectly. Because life is like that sometimes. Because things aren’t perfect, things don’t work out perfectly. There are no “happy endings.” But there can be peace, there can be joy, even if momentary, and dreams aren’t lost forever if you drop them on the road of life. You can go back and find your way into them, find your way back into the light.

“Into Invisible Light” opens in Canada on January 9th. Keep your eyes peeled for streaming release dates.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

December 2018 Viewing Diary

Swimming with Men (2018; d. Oliver Parker)
A rather slight little comedy about men forming a synchronized swimming team. I reviewed for Ebert.

Zama (2018; d. Lucrecia Martel)
One of the best films of the year (I saw it after I submitted my Top 10s. I got behind in viewing, I couldn’t help it. Too much to see!) It was in Film Comment’s Top 10, which was very exciting.

Don’t Look Now (1074; d. Nicolas Roeg)
Roeg died in December, and Film Comment asked me to write a tribute (which is in the Jan/Feb 2019 issue, as well as online). This is the movie of his I know best, and its creepiness never fails to get under my skin. It’s an extremely unnerving film. That opening sequence! The way Roeg put it together. It’s so bold. It breaks SO MANY RULES. Roeg’s like “Rules shmules.”

Vox Lux (2018; d. Brady Corbet)
I can’t stop thinking about this movie. I reviewed for Ebert. I read some article where the writer talked about how the movie showed pop music’s healing properties, how in the final scene it shows how pop music brings a community together, how the movie’s attitude was the antithesis of the “anti-pop-music” attitude of A Star is Born. I read the article and thought, like the black-hearted bitch that I am, “You have got to be kidding me.”

Performance (1970; d. Nicolas Roeg and Donald Cammell)
After years as a cinematographer, Roeg became a director with this. And what a debut. There is nothing else like this movie. How could there be? Very much looking forward to participating in a discussion about this movie following its screening on January 10th and the IFC Center.

The Witches (1990; d. Nicolas Roeg)
I hadn’t watched this movie since it came out. It is so disturbing.

Happy as Lazarro (2018; d. Alice Rohrwacher)
My God, this movie. One of the movies of the year. I don’t even know how Rohrwacher pulled this off. Wrote about it briefly here.

Shirkers (2018; d. Sandi Tan)
In my Top 10. Wrote about it here.

Documenting Hate: New American Nazis (2018)
A Frontline episode on PBS. I’m so angry at what has been happening, what continues to happen.

The Man Who Fell to Earth (1976; d. Nicolas Roeg)
A haunting film. And Elvis is involved. Because of course. If you are an alien who falls to earth, if you don’t watch Elvis movies, there’s no hope for you. You want to understand our planet? You have to understand Elvis. (Also, there is the fact that 1. David Bowie and Elvis share a birthday. 2. David Bowie and Elvis were both the #1 singers on RCA, except in different generations.

Hale County, This Morning This Evening (2018; d. RaMell Ross)
This also made the Film Comment Top 10, which is thrilling. One of the documentaries of the year (and it was an extremely strong year for documentaries.) I wrote a little bit about the film here.

Intervention, a couple of Season 16 episodes
They haven’t changed the format since it started. It works. One of the strengths of the show is its sense of realism about addiction, and those final sometimes devastating credit lines: “so and so relapsed.” or “so and so has been sober since …” or “so and so is now living with [terrible drug addict boyfriend” … No easy fix. Getting clean is hard.

Roma (2018; d. Alfonso Cuaron)
Jen and I went to go see this at the IFC Center. It was my second time seeing it. It’s overwhelming. It was also great to feel Jen responding to it next to me. She dissolved into sobs during one scene. If you’ve seen the movie, you’ll probably know what scene.

Walkabout (1971; d. Nicolas Roeg)
An international sensation. It’s been years since I saw it. Wonderful to revisit.

Sweet Bird of Youth (1989; d. Nicolas Roeg)
What a treat this was. I saw it on TV when it first aired. I knew the script by heart, practically, as well as the original movie starring Paul Newman and Geraldine Page. Elizabeth Taylor is fantastic as “The Princess.” Page made her name playing the role, and it could be seen as definitive, I suppose. But there are many ways to approach things. Taylor used her own “way in” and it all made perfect sense. She was funny and sad and sexually desperate and occasionally biting in her wit and self-awareness.

Bad Timing (1980; d. Nicolas Roeg)
Theresa Russell’s performance … Good Lord in heaven is it good. She was only 23 years old. If Nicolas Roeg hadn’t come along, and saw something else in her besides “hot blonde” … who knows what would have happened. This is an unbelievable performance. Very upsetting movie.

Track 29 (1988; d. Nicolas Roeg)
This movie is WACKO. I don’t think I had seen it before. I tracked it down in preparation for my Nicolas Roeg tribute in Film Comment. With Theresa Russell again, as a bored housewife with a Southern accent, who sleeps in a bedroom surrounded by her dolls. There’s a kind of 29 Wagons Full of Cotton thing going on here. She’s married to none other than Christopher Lloyd, who is obsessed with his model train set, and can’t be bothered to pay attention to her. Into this mix comes Gary Oldman, a mysterious stranger who materializes – literally – by the side of the road, and seeks out Russell, claiming to be the child she gave up for adoption years before. She and Oldman are almost the same age, though, so you wonder what else might be going on here. The movie goes off the rails. Just like Christopher Lloyd’s beloved train set. It’s INSANE. Young actresses today, for the most part, are not willing to go where Theresa Russell went in her work. Or maybe they’re not able to. Or maybe the roles just aren’t being written, and therefore the actresses don’t develop those skills. Women now are supposed to be empowering role models or “badasses” or walk around with “agency”. What about humanity? What about the ugliness of life and love? What about pain and sorrow and desperation and making HUGE mistakes and behaving badly? This is where Russell LIVES and I DIG IT.

Supernatural, Season 14, episode 8 “Byzantium” (2018; d. Eduardo Sánchez)
This moment below … I was like, “What the hell are those people smoking over there? Castiel laughing like this? In what freakin’ world? Stop reading fan forums and fan fic. This is fan fic, not the show. Jesus GOD just understand the damn characters you’re writing. Keep some consistency.” That being said: Veronica Cartwright was fantastic.

Minding the Gap (2018; d. Bing Liu)
Wonderful documentary. I wrote a little bit about it here.

Mindhunter, Season 1 (2018; d. David Fincher, and others)
I re-watched the whole thing. I am looking forward to Season 2. It’s deeper than I first perceived. It’s not just about setting up the Behavioral Science Unit. It’s really about men. The certainty of men. The entitlement of men. But the WAY it’s about these things is really subtle. There’s a cloud of plausible deniability around it (just like there is in the book). I can’t wait for Season 2.

Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath (Season 3 episodes, so far)
This woman. THIS WOMAN. HERO. HERO. I can’t even believe where she’s going in Season 3. I mean, I believe it, but I still – as a long-time critic – have moments of disconnect where I think, “She’s actually daring to go HERE?” I admire her so much.

Deadwood, Season 2, episodes 1 – 6
Okay, okay, so now I know what the fuss was all about. The kidney stone episode was unbearable. Even now, I think about it, and shiver with revulsion. I was screaming, “NO. NO. NO.” However, it did make me think: we human beings are tough motherfuckers. Look at all we have endured for MILLENNIA before modern meds came around. We are stronger than we know.

Supernatural, Season 14, episode 9 “The Spear” (2018; d. Amyn Kaderali)
It’s weird. It’s almost like the Uncanny Valley Effect. Even in moments that sorta work, you still know somewhere … “Something is really really off.” I’m so bummed. I coulda used the escape of this show over the last wretched two years. They let me down.

Last Tango in Paris (1973; d. Bernardo Bertolucci)
Charley and I went to go see it at The Quad. After all the chatter around the film, especially in the wake of Bertolucci’s death, it was good to engage with the actual thing. When things become too abstract, I lose interest. I want to engage with the thing, whatever it is. It’s okay if you don’t feel the same way. I wish people would return the favor. I’ve seen this movie so many times, the first time when I was a teenager and in the first flush of my Brando phase. Even then, as a 14, 15 year old, I felt its mournfulness. For me, it was all about the grief and the sadness, the wellspring from which every single thing happens in the film. It’s still that way for me. And she is a survivor. He goes down with the ship. She knows enough to get out when she’s had enough. Brando gives one of the great all-time performances. Maybe even the greatest. Nobody else could do it. It’s all him.

The Innocent Man (2018)
A true crime mini-series on Netflix, based on a John Grisham book (a non-fiction book). I thought it was really good.

The Destroyer (2018; d. Karyn Kusama)
I reviewed for Ebert. The whole movie was basically about Nicole Kidman’s makeup job.

Girl (2018; d. Lukas Dhont)
I am reviewing this one for Ebert.

What Happened Was… (1994; d. Tom Noonan)
I’ve been wanting to write about this GREAT movie for years. I actually did write something already, but it was a million eons ago and it’s time to re-visit.

McQueen (2018; d. Ian Bonhôte)
A devastating (and informative) documentary about fashion designer Alexander McQueen. I was so upset by this film.

The Magnificent Ambersons (1942; d. Orson Welles)
Everyone knows the story about Ambersons, how the studio took it away from Welles, and re-cut it, ruining it (in Welles’ opinion). The original Welles-cut is the Holy Grail of cinema. HOWEVER. The re-cut version is also, in my opinion, something of a masterpiece. It’s heartbreaking, detailed, character-driven and yet also … its themes are enormous: progress, America, technology, ethical concerns, ambition … It’s gigantic. I love this film. It’s been a very Welles-heavy year and I’m so happy about it.

The House That Jack Built (2018; d. Lars Von Trier)
After all THAT, after all the controversy and outrage (from many who had not even seen the film yet) … I absolutely loved it. Matt Dillon is great, his best in years. And LVT is his typical provoking self. Sometimes you’re like, “Oh, come ON, Lars, REALLY??” but that’s part of what you get if you get into him. The movie is funny, too. Someone on Facebook expressed surprise that I had liked it. Well, I’m on record loving LVT, and with taking him seriously as an artist, even as he drives me crazy, which he often does. Don’t make assumptions about me, please. Or at least read more of my work before you assume I will or will not like something. I think Melancholia is one of the best movies of the last 30 years. I loved the Nymphomaniac series. I’m still not on board with Breaking the Waves. He’s very difficult. Sometimes enraging. But I think he’s major, and I think his work is worth grappling with. There’s much to grapple. It’s even fun to argue with him. This is a nutty movie. Footage of Glenn Gould playing the piano is involved, for example.

Out of the Blue (1980; d. Dennis Hopper)
This movie is streaming on Amazon. It’s such an important movie. Linda Manz as a punk-rock and Elvis-obsessed teenager, trying to deal with her life, her ex-con dad (Hopper), her floozy junkie mom (Sharon Ferrell). There’s a bleak nihilistic atmosphere and the film has the courage of its convictions. That final scene! There are many “Elvis haunted” movies. Out of the Blue is #1 on that list.

Murder By Numbers (2002; d. Barbet Schroeder)
Prompted by a conversation on Twitter. In my opinion, this is Sandra Bullock’s best performance. (I referenced it in my review for Destroyer. Bullock is playing a similar character, and yet she doesn’t try to over-play it with a zombie-like makeup job. It’s all in her acting.) This was the first moment I noticed Ryan Gosling. My reaction was: “Holy shit, who is THAT.”

North Dallas Forty (1979; d. Ted Kotcheff)
Such a good film. With such a good performance from Nick Nolte at its center. It’s launched a Nick Nolte retrospective at Chez Sheila. I wrote about one of Nick Nolte’s acting moments – and Nick Nolte, in general.

Posted in Monthly Viewing Diary, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

For Film Comment: In Memorian: Nicolas Roeg

The first piece of 2019: an essay on the late Nicolas Roeg in the Jan/Feb 2019 issue of Film Comment. (The piece is also online).

Posted in Directors, RIP | Tagged | Leave a comment

2018 in a nutshell

Happy New Year.

Posted in Personal | Leave a comment

The Vulnerability of Nick Nolte: Going Deep

At a party scene early on in North Dallas Forty, the 1979 film adaptation of wide receiver Peter Gent’s raunchy cynical novel about pro football (side note: Nancy Dowd worked on the script in an uncredited capacity, the woman who wrote Slap Shot), Nick Nolte’s Phil Elliott – a busted-up wide receiver with the North Dallas Bulls, has a conversation with a fellow player, who then walks away to join the orgy going on in the next room. Once Nolte is alone, he blanks out: his social self empties out of him. Although it’s subtle, you can see it happen. Once he’s blanked out, it’s like a bottom drops out within him, and something else starts to rise. Worry. Or maybe a vague sense of unease. Again, it’s subtle. To sum up: he’s left alone, he goes deep into himself, and then … he goes even deeper. None of this would be visible in a theatre. This is the epitome of acting for the camera. It’s a sliiiight adjustment in the eyes.

Dennis Hopper told a great story about directing Colors, and there was a scene where Robert Duvall had to be going through a wad of cash and he was supposed to be pissed. During the scene, Hopper, standing right there, 2 feet away from Duvall, couldn’t see a reaction in Duvall’s face. It looked like Duvall was just flipping through the cash casually, like it was a normal everyday moment. Hopper wanted to feel Duvall’s anger. Why wasn’t Duvall doing it? (I love that Hopper, in his capacity as a director, had to discover something he already knew as an actor.) Hopper thought: Duvall is the greatest actor ever, and he’s being so blase in what’s supposed to be a tense scene. Then Hopper went and watched the dailies. And there was the whole performance, it was all there, in a small tightening of Duvall’s lips, a tiny sliver of steel in Duvall’s eyes. The moment was imperceptible to Hopper standing 2 feet away, but it was picked up by the camera. And the moment was even better, probably, than the more cliched display of anger Hopper had been expecting.

And that’s what happens with Nolte in this moment in North Dallas Forty where he is suddenly left alone. His social self vanishes, he flat-lines, and then something else – hard to say what it is exactly – takes its place. Nolte isn’t doing any of this to “show” us something. Honestly, it barely appears to be a “choice”. Nolte’s unconcsious, his instincts, his emotional availability, at the wheel. The unnameable thing in Nolte’s eyes IS the character. THAT – right there in his eyes – IS who this guy is. He shows us. Throughout the whole movie Phil Elliott, creaky with injuries, in constant pain, pops pills, filled with resentment of the heavy-handed treatment he gets at the hands of the owner, hops around from bed to bed, lifting weights with cigarette dangling, a spectacle of ruination. And yet he can play ball. He loves the game. But there … that vague sense of something which floods his eyes, so subtle you couldn’t see it from 2 feet away … IS the character, his underlying mood and state of mind.

This kind of moment is why I went through such a serious Nick Nolte phase in high school (and afterwards, of course, but I studied him for an intense couple of months). This was when I started keeping my eyes peeled for really good acting, and tried to analyze it. He was one of the guys I tried to study. I was serious about acting. It was a craft. This was my apprenticeship. Whatever it was Nolte brought to the table was rather difficult to describe: it’s subtle, but so eloquent.

In my essay about Something Wild for Criterion I wrote of Ralph Meeker that “Very few actors are even capable of going as deep as Meeker does here.” The same is true of Nolte. And it’s not about big displays, or temper tantrums, the kinds of things critics usually praise actors for because it’s obvious.

It’s not just that other actors are not courageous enough to go where Nolte goes, or inventive enough, although who knows, maybe some of that is true. It’s that some people have more depth than others, or, maybe it’s more accurate to say that their depths are not hidden from them in the way they are hidden from most people. (Most people walk around having no idea how deep their pain really goes, and they do whatever they can do to NOT feel whatever it is they are feeling. Half of the time acting classes are taken up with actors getting relaxed enough to actually feel their pain, dig into that well inside of them, be brave enough to feel.)

We’re all special, we all have things to offer, blah blah, but a movie camera will show you without a shadow of a doubt that some people just flat out have more to draw on than other people do. You can learn to become more fluid, more open, more relaxed as an actor. But Nolte is on another level. All you can do is watch and learn and allow yourself to be inspired. He has always been slightly uncanny in his vulnerability (his vulnerability is one of his defining characteristics, and that paired with his bulk, his size, his undeniable manliness creates a killer combo).

Nolte can go deeper than most because the well he draws on is deeper already.

He’s not afraid to let us see it.

Posted in Actors | 13 Comments

2018 Books Read

2018 Books Read

1. Tamburlaine, Part 1, by Christopher Marlowe
I finished 2017 with Paradise Lost, in the mood to continue with rigorous challenging poetry. I decided to read the complete plays of Christopher Marlowe (re-read in most cases). The project took all year, since I took months off after starting it. But it’s quite an illuminating and gratifying thing to do, I highly recommend it. His plays are so daunting, so gigantic, so violent … it’s hard to even grasp them in one go. Tamburlaine has always been my favorite – I’ve written about it before – especially the way Marlowe imagines himself into a tyrant’s head, a man with almost unimaginable power. What does the world look like from the point of view of such a person? How do they see themselves? How do they see the world? The language of both Tamburlaines is some of the greatest poetry on earth.

2. Tamburlaine, Part 2, by Christopher Marlowe
Marlowe presents a world with no morals, no uplift, no “and what we have all learned from this is …” He abandons you: you must think for yourself.

3. Mindhunter: Inside the FBI’s Elite Serial Crime Unit, by John E. Douglas
I read this one since I got so sucked into the David Fincher mini-series (which I HIGHLY recommend). The adaptation is the thing here. I wrote a thing on Twitter (in 140 character bursts) about it, since I just re-watched the series, and was thinking a lot about the strange “voice” of the book, and how Fincher et al translated that into this series. Which is not just a “serial killer procedural” – although it has those elements too. It’s a period piece, and embedded within it is a critique of rigidly enforced masculinity – not just in the serial killers, but also in those who hunt them. The book is a very weird book. Douglas reveals way more about himself than he thinks he does. I read the book and feel a sense of familiarity – I know guys like this, we all do, know-it-all guys, guys who tell stories where they always come out on top in the end. But it’s so inadvertent you wonder if you might be missing something. Fincher clearly “heard” that aspect of the voice, too. And really goes after it in the mini-series.

4. Edward II, by Christopher Marlowe
A history play about some very ugly irredeemable people.

5. Where I Was From, by Joan Didion
A re-read. Joan Didion’s excellent book on California, part memoir, part history, part contemporary reportage. It’s one of my favorites of hers.

6. The Stories of John Cheever, by John Cheever
I was inspired to finally eradicate this “gap” in my reading through Olivia Laing’s superb The Trip to Echo Spring, in which John Cheever is one of the alcoholic writers profiled. The weird thing is: I have heard so much about “The Swimmer” (even before I saw the movie) that a part of me almost felt like I had read the story. It’s like “The Dead” or something, a short story with such towering stature it arrives into you by osmosis. I first read “The Swimmer” – and all of his stories – this winter. They are so bleak it was quite a chore. I can’t remember who said it, but … there is no catharsis in John Cheever. He leaves you no way out. Before there was even the term “male privilege” (so overused now I was sick of it as of last year) … John Cheever was its most brutal chronicler. Every single story is about unearned “male privilege,” “The Swimmer” being the most obvious example, but in story after story – showing us men who were mediocre, and yet who assumed they were excellent and unique – men who yearn to join the country club set – they “deserve” it – empty men, hollow men … Cheever goes after his sex like almost no other author. He’s brilliant. I am very glad I took care of this gap. Enough already. It’s also a good corrective to those who think they’re the first ones who noticed male privilege. Please. Read Cheever.

7. Heart Songs and Other Stories, by Annie Proulx
One of my favorite authors. I had no idea she just published a GIGANTIC novel: Barkskins: A Novel. Like, Don DeLillo’s Underworld gigantic. Her longest novel yet. I am so excited to read it I’m almost nervous. These early short stories are wonderful.

8. The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia, by Masha Gessen
Masha Gessen pisses some people off – on the left and the right. So many authors I love piss people off on the left and the right, equally. Starting with Orwell. Whistler blowers. This on-the-ground exploration – from a Russian – a gay Russian – who fled Russia herself – of how Putin did what he did – is a must-read. Her focus on LGBTQ issues is one of her biggest contributions, since it’s such a huge part of what’s going on there. A lot of “straight” writers have a blind spot about this, or it’s referenced in among many other more “important” things. Gessen focuses on it. She’s lived it. She’s said some things which have gotten people riled up. She’s not a party-line person. For me, this is in her favor (whether I agree with her or not is irrelevant). Your mileage may vary.

9. In Europe’s Shadow: Two Cold Wars and a Thirty-Year Journey Through Romania and Beyond, by Robert Kaplan
I’ve been revisiting Robert Kaplan’s essential work, catching up on some of the books he published since I took a Kaplan break. This one, about Romania and his love for Romania, his travels there – from the Cold War to now – is gorgeous. He’s one of my favorite writers. He and Rebecca West – both – were responsible for putting Croatia on my radar, way back when.

10. Out of the Vinyl Deeps: Ellen Willis on Rock Music, by Ellen Willis
Ellen Willis was the first pop music critic for The New Yorker. Many of these pieces appeared there for the first time. A great great music writer (although that was only one aspect of her career.)

11. The Essential Ellen Willis, by Ellen Willis
Having not had enough of Willis, I moved on to this great collection of her political and feminist writing. I wish her piece on Monica Lewinsky had resurrected itself over this past year. It deserves to be part of the conversation. I distrust conversations that feel like monoliths. I can’t help it. 100% agreement makes me itchy, makes me wait for the shoe to drop. Willis’ radical feminism was too radical for many back in the day and she was front and center in a lot of those internecine wars that feel so archaic now – but – in many ways, are still being fought over. One of the things that comes up again and again and again in Willis’ writing is pleasure. She put pleasure at the top of the list of things worth fighting for. Now THAT’S radical.

12. Whoever Fights Monsters: My Twenty Years Tracking Serial Killers for the FBI, by Robert K. Ressler
Still watching Mindhunter, figured I’d re-visit this one. I can’t get enough of this stuff.

13. The Art of American Screen Acting, 1912-1960, by Dan Callahan
An amazing book, one of the essential books of the year. I interviewed Dan about it for Slant Magazine.

14. The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby, by Tom Wolfe
Tom Wolfe died, which sent me on an orgy of re-reading. It’s been years. He is so much fun. He has longer staying power than many of his contemporaries, the other “New Journalist” guys. His style is audacious, you can’t even believe he gets away with it. And maybe he doesn’t sometimes. But he swings you along on his momentum, and he’s nearly impossible to resist. These essays are the ones that made him famous. Terrific.

15. Finnegans Wake, by James Joyce
In January, I got an assignment for Film Comment which made me pick this up to read it straight through. They asked me to review Mary Ellen Bute’s film adaptation of Joyce’s novel. I had enough lead time that I thought, “Okay. I wasn’t PLANNING on reading Finnegans Wake this year, but oh well, HERE GOES IT.” As I did the last time I read it, I read a couple of pages every morning – out loud (I can’t stress how key this is: it LOOKS incomprehensible on the page, but sound it out – you’ll find the sense there) – and finished it in a couple of months. This has been a very very hard year for our family. The Finnegans Wake ritual was practically sacred to me, a grounding start to the day, an immersion into this beautiful ur-language, just swimming around in the pure genius of the whole thing. When I sat down to write my review of the Mary Ellen Bute film, I was MORE than ready.

16. On the Road, by Jack Kerouac
It’s interesting. This book can get tiresome. You want to tell them all to go home, stop drinking, get some rest. But what I like to do is imagine myself back to the time when it was published, how much it represented a rebellion of the spirit and mind, particularly for men – who were trapped by patriarchal structures just as women were. What would it mean for men to stop accepting handed-down tropes for their sex? Not accepting boredom and repression as your lot in life. There’s clearly a queer element to all of this. Everyone is so obsessed with Dean Moriarty – the book is, in a lot of ways, a meditation on charisma. My father loved this book. It was HUGE for his generation, the conventional-Eisenhower-era-man-in-grey-suit generation. It doesn’t travel all that well, despite some beautiful passages – but you can feel, trembling in those passages, the revolution it represented … and what was coming …

17. State of the Art, by Pauline Kael
She’s so much fun. I like arguing with her in my head. I like how she writes.

18. The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test, by Tom Wolfe
You would swear that Tom Wolfe was there all along, ON that bus. An amazing piece of reportage, especially the one or two moments where he senses, “Okay … this is all about to go very very wrong …”

19. On Chesil Beach, by Ian McEwan
I was assigned to review the film adaptation, and I had a feeling the adaptation would be an important element. I read the book when it first came out and remembered the very strange and unique TONE of the book, its distance, almost social-studies distance. Needless to say, the film was unable to capture that tone, and therefore unable to tell the story it was meant to tell. Here’s my review.

20. I’ll Be Gone in the Dark: One Woman’s Obsessive Search for the Golden State Killer, by Michelle McNamara
I got swept away by this whole thing. An amazing (and sad, considering her early death) portrait of obsession.

21. Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, by Michael Wolff
That opening scene of election night … these horrible grifters disgust me so much. I say this with all the patriotism I possess (and that’s a lot of patriotism).

22. Asia’s Cauldron: The South China Sea and the End of a Stable Pacific, by Robert Kaplan
More catching up with Kaplan. He’s been a canary in a coalmine for a while. He mixes optimism with pessimism, in the way only a person with the long view of history can achieve. Short-term memory is a REAL problem now, people thinking their generation invented this or that, or that history has never confronted this or that before … Kaplan’s knowledge goes back to antiquity. It HELPS. There is no excuse to not be educated, ESPECIALLY now that we have this awful thing called The Internet.

23. Deeper into Movies, by Pauline Kael
More Kael. How on earth did she keep up this pace?

24. The Kremlin Ball, by Curzio Malaparte
First translated into English this year. This book is an absolute wonder. Malaparte died leaving it unfinished. Its portrait of the Bolshevik elite – the hierarchy of the Bolsheviks in 1920s Russia – putting to rest forever the LIE that these criminals were even INTERESTED in Socialism and leveling the playing field. PLEASE. It was always about putting the reins of power into the hands of a very small group. This book is grotesque, funny, a revelation. Stalin cameos, too, and his crush on a certain ballerina. I read it so fast I need to read it again.

25. Radical Chic and Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers, by Tom Wolfe
“Radical Chic” is one of the bitchiest – and truest – things I have ever read. Balls of steel to publish a piece like that. Naming names. The ridiculousness of the politically conscious social set. Black Panthers circulating at this chi-chi party. The clash of cultures. Wolfe is BRUTAL. Also, the piece is laugh-out-loud funny.

26. The Case of Comrade Tulayev, by Victor Serge
A re-read of Victor Serge’s brilliant novel about the murder of a “Comrade Tulayev,” a higher-up in the Soviet hierarchy. What it’s really about is the murder of Kirov in 1934. As Robert Conquest wrote in his book The Great Terror: “This killing [the murder of Kirov] has every right to be called the crime of the century. Over the next four years, hundreds of Soviet citizens, including the most prominent political leaders of the Revolution, were shot for direct responsibility for the assassination, and literally millions of others went to their deaths for complicity in one or another part of the vast conspiracy which allegedly lay behind it. Kirov’s death, in fact, was the keystone of the entire edifice of terror and suffering by which Stalin secured his grip on the Soviet peoples.” Serge’s book shows how that gigantic murderous conspiracy happened.

27. The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone, by Olivia Laing
My second Olivia Laing, after Trip to Echo Spring. This book, about loneliness and solitude, is one of the books of the year for me. I’m a lonely person, but I also cherish solitude. Being alone doesn’t mean being lonely … except when it does. It’s the air I breathe. I live in a city. Being lonely in a city has a very particular essence. Captured in the paintings of Edward Hopper. In some of the poems of Frank O’Hara. Laing meditates on these things. She’s just amazing.

28. Double Indemnity, by James M. Cain
I never get sick of Cain’s stuff. That flat-affect voice … pure sociopathy … just brilliant.

29. Play It As It Lays, by Joan Didion
I re-read this one (maybe my 10th, 15th, time?) since I was writing it up for Sight & Sound‘s “Flick Lit” issue, an entire issue devoted to novels about Hollywood.

30. Hooked, by Pauline Kael
Can’t stop the Kael train!

31. Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail ’72, by Hunter S. Thompson
I’ve been meaning to do a re-read of all of his stuff. And so I began here. It’s such an incredible book. So funny you wipe tears of laughter off your face, but also so angry you almost cringe away from it. Incredible in-the-moment political analysis, a great book about America’s politics.

32. Recollections of My Life as a Woman: The New York Years, by Diane Di Prima
I’ve been meaning to read this one for a long time, ever since Jessa Crispin recommended it back in the Book Slut days. It’s as good as she said it was. The memoir of Diane Di Prima, poet and huge player in the New York bohemian scene of the 1960s. It’s an incredible snapshot of that time, but also a poignant and piercing memoir of an Italian girl who grew up in an abusive traditional household … who was basically disowned when she got pregnant … who kept getting pregnant and kept having babies (much to her hip friends’ dismay) … But it also really makes you yearn for the New York of those days, cheap and dangerous, yes, but where artists could actually gather, not pay a lot of rent, and do their work. Those days are so dead it’s like reading about Atlantis. A wonderful book.

33. The Soccer War, by Ryszard Kapuściński
One of my favorite writers. This book was my “way in.” Highly recommended.

34. Another Day of Life, by Ryszard Kapuściński
Kapuściński talked his editors into allowing him to go to Angola to cover the civil war. This is the result. Must-read.

35. Rogue Male, by Geoffrey Household
Thank you, Charley, for recommending this book. Published in 1937, it starts with a man staring through a rifle sight at a certain world leader strutting on a private balcony, realizing how easy it would be to take him out. The world leader is unnamed. But consider the year it was published. The book has been made into films a number of times (most famously, Manhunt, by Fritz Lang). It’s a thrilling chase novel, along the lines of The Fugitive,

36. The Right Stuff, by Tom Wolfe
I don’t want to say it is his best, but it is the one I read first (in high school), and the one that truly swept me away. First Man, this year, was good, but there were elements in it that really bugged me, and mainly it was because Tom Wolfe’s observations about how DIFFERENT these guys were from most of us – was left out. Neil Armstrong went to the moon to deal with the death of his daughter. Stephanie Zacharek, in her review, said the movie made her feel protective of these guys, these touch taciturn guys, who were so brave, and did things most of us will never ever do. I admired much of the movie but I felt the same way.

37. When the Lights Go Down, by Pauline Kael
Once I started, I couldn’t very well stop, now could I?

38. LaBrava, by Elmore Leonard
One of my favorite Elmore Leonards. LaBrava himself … what a character! But the book is steeped in good characters and atmosphere. I love it so much.

39. Reeling, by Pauline Kael
Ibid. Idem. Exeunt.

40. Black Mischief, by Evelyn Waugh
Wow, this book is … something. It’s the only Waugh novel I hadn’t read.

41. Seduction: Sex, Lies, and Stardom in Howard Hughes’s Hollywood, by Karina Longworth
I read this on assignment from The LA Times, who asked me to review the book. Which I did. I thought it was great. As I said in the review, it takes the anecdotes separated into 500 separate Hollywood memoirs and puts them all into one place.

42. Interview With History, by Oriana Fallaci
Fallaci is a tough one. She went down swinging, and she went down ignominously. But this does not – or it should not – obliterate her accomplishments during her life. She was the only Western journalist to interview Khomeini twice (in the second interview, notoriously, she whipped off her head scarf). In the 70s, she traveled the world, interviewing every dictator and revolutionary who would submit to an interview. Christopher Hitchens wrote a piece about her called “The Art of the Interview” discussing how she is the prime example of holding power to account. When Henry Kissinger read the printed version of the interview he did with her, he was horrified (the interview caused a shitstorm – as her interviews often did; one even caused an international incident). Kissinger said agreeing to be interviewed by Oriana Fallaci was one of the most disastrous decisions in his career (and considering his career, that’s saying something). These are riveting interviews. She’s bold, she doesn’t give a shit about being polite, she doesn’t care about offending, she doesn’t kowtow, does not respect power at ALL, she doesn’t care about maintaining her “access.” She approaches each interview as though it will be the only chance she gets to ask these questions.

43. I Married a Communist, by Philip Roth
I read this one in Croatia. It’s amazing.

44. The Egotists: Sixteen Surprising Interviews, by Oriana Fallaci
These interviews are a mixed bag: she doesn’t just interview world leaders and politicians, but movie stars too. Dean Martin. Sean Connery. Again, there really aren’t any other interviews like this.

45. Animal Farm, by George Orwell
A short slim devastating book. There’s a reason secret copies were circulated through the Iron Curtain countries. Many people in those countries read the book and thought, “How does he know what’s going on here?”

46. Grant, by Ron Chernow
This took me a couple of months to finish, but it was well worth it. What a touching and complex figure he was.

47. Indignation, by Philip Roth
An interesting novel that takes place on a college campus. A young Jewish kid, at sea in a world of Gentile students, falling in love with a troubled suicidal young woman. Super short, I read this one in a day.

48. The Skeptic: A Life of H. L. Mencken, by Terry Teachout
Incredible. Yet another writer on this list who pisses almost everyone off, left, right, in-between. Teachout walks us through the man’s life, how he became THE commentator of the Jazz Age (even though he was a homebody who lived with his mother), how his dispatches from the Scopes Trial occurred – they’re still electrifying to read today – how vicious he could be towards the things he found absurd. He was one of those people who didn’t recognize the threat of Hitler (he wasn’t alone), who thought of him as a goofball publicity stunt (hmmm, sound familiar?), and who found himself behind the times as his life went on, a cranky conservative. It’s an interesting trajectory. One of the most popular writers of his day. Nobody can write like Mencken, NOBODY.

49. Dido, Queen of Carthage, by Christopher Marlowe
I decided after a half a year away from my original Marlowe project to go back. I love this play.

50. Ms. Found In a Bottle, by Edgar Allan Poe
Terrifying. I finished it and thought, “I am legit going to have nightmares about this story.”

51. Premature Burial, by Edgar Allan Poe
How many times do people buried alive feature in his stories? The story trembles with horror.

52. William Wilson, by Edgar Allan Poe
I love stories about doppelgangers, Dostoevsky, Joseph Conrad, both wrote great stories about doppelgangers showing up. You wonder if the narrator is making it up, or if he’s so split off that there’s really only one of him, or if there really are such things as twins running around out there wreaking havoc.

53. Eleonara, by Edgar Allan Poe
A fairy tale almost, about a perfect beautiful woman who dies and suddenly the world she lived in starts to die too. Poe was a romantic about women. They were spectral “Others” to him.

55. The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket, by Edgar Allan Poe
Total page-turner. There are a couple of descriptions of storms at sea which are so frightening I almost wanted to stop (a gift of his, seen in “Maelstrom” and “Ms. Found in a Bottle.”) You cannot believe how much happens to this Pym person. Nobody could ever keep up!

56. The Massacre at Paris, by Christopher Marlowe
I had never read this one before. It’s fantastic.

57. That Was Something, by Dan Callahan
My friend Dan’s first novel. This is the second book by Dan on the list, and both of them came out this year! Go, Dan! Proud of my friend! I wrote about this beautiful novel here.

58. Doctor Faustus, by Christopher Marlowe
A masterpiece.

59. Deadline Artists: America’s Greatest Newspaper Columns
I had been reading this book one piece at a time for the whole year. It’s an amazing compilation of all of these famous newspaper columnists, from Mencken to Jimmy Breslin, writing about the issues of their day, some still famous (JFK’s assassination) and some lost in the mists of time. A wonderful historical account.

60. This Side of Paradise, by F. Scott Fitzgerald
Fitzgerald’s astonishingly assured first novel. You read some of his insights, some of his prose, realize he was 19, 20 when he wrote them, and think, “Fuck you, Scott!” as well as “My God, I will never be this good” or “At 19 I was still writing ‘OMG I think he likes me’ in my diary.” Incredible. Self-aware.

61. The Great Shark Hunt: Strange Tales from a Strange Time (Gonzo Papers, Volume 1), by Hunter S. Thompson
Oh, Hunter. I’m angry that you left us. I would love to hear what you have to say now. A brilliant compilation of his work. There are 3 more volumes to go, all of which I will be tackling. Nobody like him. I love his writing so much.

62. The Jew of Malta, by Christopher Marlowe
So anti-Semitic, and yet embedded within it is a critique of anti-Semitism. You want to see how it operates? Here it all is. And we sure could use a refresher course, especially now, with Neo Nazis on the move, in the government, but also with, for example, the Chicago Dykes March being disrupted into controversy because some of the marchers were “triggered” by the sight of a star of David on a flag being carried by a Jewish lesbian. Or, hello, Alice Walker. You’re far from being off the hook, liberals.

63. The Secret Place, by Tana French
I love this series so much, but have fallen behind in keeping up with it. This may be the best one. The Likeness remains my favorite, I think, but she really blew me away here with what she did, and how she did it. She structured it in a really interesting way. One section of it – the flashbacks – take place over the course of one year. But the main narrative, the police investigation, takes place over one very long day. This is very bold. French works within a genre, but she also makes up her own rules. I think she’s one of the best things going today.

63. Hooking Up, by Tom Wolfe
One of his later compilations. Written just as the Internet started to take hold, and make inroads into the mainstream. The whole Y2K thing!

64. The Virgin Suicides, by Jeffrey Eugenides
Haunting. I love the plural narrator. It’s so intensely objectifying of these girls (one of the creepiest asides is “oral, alas”) that it becomes a commentary on objectification. How unknowable anyone is, but especially girls when seen through the prism of male desire. Just a terribly sad story.

65. And Yet…: Essays, by Christopher Hitchens
Some of these I remember reading when he was alive, on Slate, or Vanity Fair, or The Atlantic. It certainly would have been interesting to read his responses to what is happening now. There are a lot of authors included here who are so hated that people literally recoil when you say their name. Hitchens is one of those writers. I probably hate some of the writers you love, too.

66. Master Misery, by Truman Capote
A haunting story included in The Grass Harp collection. It’s a creepy tale about a put-upon young woman living in New York who starts to “sell her dreams,” literally, to this creepy guy in a brownstone on the East Side. You go in, tell the dude some dream you have, and he pays you. 5 bucks if it’s okay, 10 bucks if it’s a REALLY good dream. He doesn’t pay you if the dream is bad, or if it’s a dream about him. Seems rather innocuous until … it’s not. There’s one paragraph that is almost a direct steal from the final section of “The Dead” … an unavoidable comparison … but I’ve always liked this story.

67. The Way Men Act: A Novel, by Elinor Lipman
I am going to do a re-read of all of her books in 2019. I started here, with the first one of hers I read. She is such a good writer. So funny, but there’s always a strong social/cultural critique in her books, too. A modern comedy-of-manners writer. We don’t have many of them anymore. I highly recommend her stuff.

68. The Postman Always Rings Twice, by James M. Cain
A favorite. Slim and brutal. With the hottest sex scene in any book ever, and it’s only 13 words:

I had to have her, if I hung for it.
I had her.

69. Waiting for Lefty, by Clifford Odets
I haven’t read this play in years. My God, it brought me back. It’s like my whole life is in this play. Every dream I’ve had, every goal I’ve cherished … is here. What Odets represents. What The Group Theatre represented to me. The revelation that is his language and how that changed how I thought about acting during my crucial actor growth spurt, when I was 15/16. The way it starts mid-argument. “You’re so wrong I ain’t laughing.” Brilliant. I know vast sections of it by heart (the Joe and Edna scene, the “grapefruit” monologue, the final scene – it all came back to me. I was reciting it out loud AS I read it). “Stormbirds of the working class.” Damn you, Clifford, I get goosebumps every time.

Previously

2017 books read
2016 books read
2015 books read
2014 books read
2013 books read
2012 books read
2011 books read
2010 books read
2009 books read
2008 books read
2007 books read
2006 books read
2005 books read

Posted in Books, James Joyce | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Year in Review: Running my mouth in 2018

Thanks, everyone, who hangs out here, who likes what I do, whether you’re an Elvis fan, a Supernatural fan, a general cinephile, a book-lover, or just someone who’s been checking in periodically for almost 16 years – WHAT? – I appreciate your presence, I appreciate your comments!

Here are some of the things I wrote in the year 2018, for many different outlets, as well as for my own site.

Movies/Television

I wrote the cover story for the Jan/Feb issue of Film Comment, on Paul Thomas Anderson’s marvel of a movie, Phantom Thread.

The situation would be intolerable to a more conventional or easily cowed woman, but Alma is not conventional, nor is she easily cowed. She is, if anything, stranger and more eccentric—more driven—than Reynolds. On the surface, her campaign to enter the inner sanctum of not just his house but his heart may sound like clichéd, even retro, material: the woman teaches the reticent man the glories of love. Audience members may want to intervene and tell Alma to forget this guy, find a man who will reciprocate. But Alma has other plans. She senses his sadness, senses his loneliness is so complete as to be absolute. How she goes about breaking him down is so “out there” it’s almost as radical as the frogs raining from the sky in Anderson’s Magnolia. Alma, at first glance a simple and easily flattered woman, reveals a will as intractable as Cyril’s. Cyril and Reynolds have met their match.

For Film Comment, I wrote about Charles Vidor’s harrowing and excellent Love Me or Leave Me, based on the life of jazz singer Ruth Etting, starring Doris Day (in a career-best performance) and James Cagney (a tour de force).

Day and Cagney are both so stripped bare here, and their scenes together shatter the conventional musical genre and move into truly harrowing territory. Their fights shiver with a real sense of danger. During one dreadful confrontation, Ruth screams at Martin, “Do you think you own me?” and the emotion is a tidal wave rising from Day’s toes.

For Rogerebert.com, I wrote about Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Loveless as part of the site’s “If We Picked the Winners” Oscar series.

[Zvyagintsev] suggests that the universal disconnection with a coherent or shared sense of the past is a major factor in creating a “loveless” culture. What past are Russians talking about when they talk about the past? Is it czarist? Is it Stalinist? Or earlier Bolshevik? Is it the 1990s and the rise of the oligarchs following the crackup of the Soviet Imperium? Or is it Putin’s version of the past? As George Orwell famously wrote in “1984,” “He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”

This might be my favorite thing I’ve written all year, if only because it had been percolating so long, one of those things I kept thinking, “Some day I’ve gotta write that up. Before someone beats me to the … sucker punch.” My thanks to Scott Tobias at Oscilloscope Labs for taking my pitch, the kind of pitch you don’t hear every day: “I’d like to do a compare and contrast with Sucker Punch and Gold Diggers of 1933.” Tobias said, “Bring it.”

The two films operate in similar ways, using dizzying artificial worlds of fantasy as a bulwark against the harsh realities of life beyond the lights. But something happens in both films: the “fantasies” shine the spotlight onto urgent social and political concerns, and so they are not just escapes from reality. They expose reality.

Written 6 months before he died, my my review of The Last Movie Star on Rogerebert.com was turned into a celebration of Reynolds’ career, charisma, and gifts. It was an honor.

Reynolds, in his heyday, had an effortlessly masculine charm and a goofball sense of humor. If that killer combo could be bottled, it would be worth millions. But it can’t be bottled, an actor just has to have it. Burt Reynolds had it.

For Rogerebert.com, I reviewed Lynne Ramsay’s long-awaited You Were Never Really Here, a powerhouse ride with a huge heartbreaker of a performance from Joaquin Phoenix.

The sound design is a living nervous breakdown. New York roars in a relentless cacophony of traffic, subways, horns. In one scene, Joe sits in a diner, and the air is filled with the conversations of people at other tables. He can’t filter any of it out.

For the March/April issue of Film Comment, I wrote about Thomas Mitchell’s terrifying performance in 1942’s Moontide. Not online, but you can order here.

Watching HBO’s 2-part Elvis Presley: The Searcher was like a long sometimes-mournful sigh of relief. A beautiful elegiac look at Elvis Presley’s musical journey, spiritual quest, and troubled reckonings with the reality of fame. I reviewed for Rogerebert.com.

By digging into the specifics of certain recordings, Zimny and his chorus of experts provide a great educational service. So, for example: after many people share memories of Elvis working on his vocal range while he was in the Army, when we hear the second single he recorded after returning home, the operatic “Now or Never,” there’s a huge payoff. Zimny led us here to the moment of vocal triumph. He’s showed us how to listen.

One of the great honors of my life was getting to interview Julie Dash, along with Chaz Ebert and Sam Fragoso, at Ebertfest, about her pioneering film Daughters of the Dust.

I also loved her anecdote about being shown Sergei Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin in a film class when she was young. At first, all the students were complaining about it audibly: “This is a silent film? It’s black and white! Oh, come ON!!” She said, “And after 10 minutes we all stopped complaining and got sucked into the story.”

For Film Comment, I wrote about experimental animator Mary Ellen Bute, and her film adaptation of James Joyce’s un-adaptable Finnegans Wake. (If ever there was a piece I was born to write …)

Bute uses her animation background to explore the text of Finnegans Wake: it’s a playful book, and so she does not take a somber approach. The action speeds up, slows down or runs backwards. She uses still photography and newsreel footage. Images repeat: eggs, light, water. Including Bute, six editors worked on the film, one of whom was a young Thelma Schoonmaker (it is her first credit). Bute has a lot of fun finding ways to theatricalize Joyce’s cacophony of words, inventing scenarios from which the language would emerge. And so a television news anchor gives a report on the events of “1132 A.D.” A vaudeville troupe performs “Tristan and Isolde,” complete with soft-shoe routine. Two loinclothed cavemen bicker. A politician rides in an elevator, giving speeches to an increasingly hostile crowd on every floor.

For Slant Magazine, I interviewed Dan Callahan about his wonderful book The Art of American Screen Acting, 1912-1960.

“Who I want to be as a person is Katharine Hepburn as she was seen by George Cukor, I want to emulate the George Cukor-Katharine Hepburn model for living. I want to be like that.”

For Rogerebert.com, I reviewed the extraordinary Beast, with a phenomenal central performance by the new-to-me Jessie Buckley.

[Buckley] is thrillingly alive, with waves of feeling erupting over her face, whether she’s struggling against the shame spiral her mother puts her through, or feverishly reaching for Pascal’s fly as they tryst in an empty forest glade. Sometimes she subsides into a strange blankness, or bursts forth in tremulous quivering need. When the film opens, Moll is already in a devastated state. Her family life is claustrophobic. Her mother is unpredictable, and yet so in control Moll cannot wriggle free. In an argument, her mother’s goal is to crush Moll’s sense of self and agency. Once she accomplishes that (and it’s not hard), she shifts abruptly, saying, “Let’s be friends again.” With all of the terrors in “Beast,” the most frightening thing may be the mother-daughter relationship.

I didn’t like On Chesil Beach at all, but reviewing the film for Rogerebert.com gave me a chance to talk about one of my pet peeves, the idea that “the book is the book, and the movie is the movie, review the movie, not the book.” It’s so lazy.

If anyone is to blame in McEwan’s book, it is a repressive society, so freaked out by sex it keeps everyone in the dark about the most basic human functions. On Chesil Beach is not peak McEwan, but the tone of the book is key to why it works. How do you transfer that tone into a film? How do you put across the proper sense of distance so that the characters are not just individuals, but representative of a time and place, the pre-sexual revolution 1960s in England? Ian McEwan, who wrote the screenplay for the film, directed by Dominic Cooke, has not solved this problem. The movie is fairly faithful to the book (except for a couple of awful invented scenes at the end), and yet so much is lost in the transfer.

For Rogerebert.com, I reviewed Jim McKay’s fantastic En el Séptimo Dia, a film about 7 days in the life of an undocumented immigrant trying to keep no less than 10 balls in the air.

“En el Séptimo Dia” makes its points powerfully, even more so since the set-up is so simple. Even better, its third act is as thrilling as anything in a traditional sports movie. McKay’s control of tone and rhythm is in high gear, creating a work both thought-provoking and hugely entertaining.

For Rogerebert.com, I reviewed Eugene Jaricki’s The King, about Elvis, cars, America, the economy, the American white underclass, Trump, and about 5,000 other things. It really doesn’t know what the hell it’s trying to say. Maybe it’s not trying to say anything. I disagree with so much of it. But it was a fascinating ride.

Sometimes the conversation is about Elvis. Other times it’s about the minimum wage, or the economic devastation of Detroit, post-car-industry. As if that weren’t enough, a parade of talking heads weighs in, each with their own particular take on Elvis, negative, positive, ambivalent. No one view is prioritized. This is not a work of hagiography (although, on some level, it is. What other cultural figure could even take being the subject of a documentary like this?)

I’ve missed doing Supernatural re-caps, but my freelance career has just been too busy. I managed to squeeze a couple in this year. First one is Season 3’s “Bedtime Stories.”

Sam and Dean are the saviors of children, but on a subtextual level, they are those children in peril, they are those siblings lost in the woods, threatened on every side, betrayed by the adults who were supposed to care for them. The mood of the episode is light, airy, fun, even with its horror. But underneath, you can’t get away from the fact that Sam and Dean were children in a fairy tale growing up, and as men they are doing the best they can but they are deeply marked by that trauma.

Debra Granik’s Leave No Trace was one of the best films of the year. I reviewed for Rogerebert.com.

These two actors are so in sync, so mentally connected, you believe totally they are father and daughter, you believe they’ve been living in the woods for months, maybe even years. The intimacy between them is so palpable it comes with great anxiety about what might be waiting for them outside the forest. Granik roots her tale in reality, focusing on the details of their lives. It is like they are one being.

I re-capped the unfairly maligned “Red Sky at Morning”, the Season 3 episode of Supernatural featuring a ghost ship, an angry one-handed pirate, Bela, and sexual shenanigans.

Sometimes you feel like Dean could go either way. Or both ways. Or all ways. His sexual orientation is “open for business.”

For Film Comment, I wrote about High Society (it was part of their “50 States” programming, so I wrote about it from the perspective of a Rhode Islander, which was so random and fun).

Throughout the film, jazz is joked about or demeaned by other characters. The society snobs turn their noses up. Jazz is uncivilized (read: African-American). How could Dexter Haven, one of their own, reject his position in society to write jazz songs? And so “That’s Jazz” is his moment of triumph.

Making my debut in Sight & Sound, I wrote about Joan Didion’s novel Play It As It Lays for their summer “Flick Lit” issue. Not online, but you can buy a print edition here.

Eighth Grade is, astonishingly, Bo Burnham’s directorial debut. It would be great if this puts to bed the lie that men cannot imagine their way into the lives of women (or girls, as the case is here). Of course they can. And vice versa. Of course women should make their own stories. But some of my favorite female characters have been written by men. So much of art is about empathy. At any rate: I reviewed Eighth Grade for Ebert.

Bo Burnham knows that of all the terrors in this world, there is nothing quite as terrifying as being a shy 8th grader, attending a birthday party for the most popular kid in school.

For Film Comment, I wrote about actress Dorothy Malone (who passed away early this year).

There’s one scene where she stands in the middle of a party, wearing a black gown and holding a drink, surrounded by couples. She looks utterly broken. It takes nerves of steel to give a performance like this.

For Rogerebert.com, I reviewed Cocote, directed by Nelson Carlo de Los Santos Arias, a film that challenges every convention of filmmaking you can think of. This was a difficult one to write, because it was hard to even discuss the film, but I’m happy with how it turned out.

De Los Santos Arias switches from black-and-white to color and back. Images repeat: a black-and-white shot of Alberto’s face as he whizzes along on his motorbike, trees above him, sun flaring out the lens. He moves from the modern capital back in time, to a place with no electricity, let alone limpidly peaceful swimming pools. Television footage sometimes interrupts the action: a man exorcises himself with great panache, an old man tells a reporter about how his rooster said the words “Christ is coming.” Alberto is pained by what he sees as a credulous and lost world.

For Rogerebert.com, I reviewed We the Animals, which I really liked a lot.

The “we” in “We the Animals” are the three brothers, barely individualized at first. They are often all in the same frame at the same time, curled up in their bed together, staring out the window, running through the forest. They are mostly shirtless, their bodies silhouetted against the sun, like identical black paper cut-outs. When we meet up with the family, the brothers are already seasoned veterans in surviving their parents’ unpredictable relationship, as it whipsaws between rage and tenderness.

If I have been wanting to write the Sucker Punch piece for about 5 years, then I’ve wanted to write the following piece for about 20 years, and I finally got a chance to: I wrote about the final scene and final shot in Shampoo – my favorite final shot in all of cinema – for the October issue of Sight & Sound. Not online, but you can buy a print version here.

For the September/October issue of Film Comment, I wrote about Tamara Jenkins’ wonderful film Private Life. Not online, but you can order a print version here.

God, I loved A Simple Favor. I reviewed for Rogerebert.com.

Kendrick is so awkward you yearn for Stephanie to just relax, but her awkwardness is why the performance is so funny. And Blake Lively is the reincarnation of Julie Christie in her best work in the 1960s and ’70s: ruthless and charming, sexy and detached, a completely destabilizing presence to men and women alike.

For Rogerebert.com, I reviewed Nappily Ever After, which features one of my favorite acting moments of the year.

And about that scene where Violet shaves her hair off: Here’s where actress and director come together, where Lathan is truly a co-creator. A lesser director might have edited the scene up into small fragments, showing Violet going from a full head of hair to no hair in a montage, holding back the “full reveal” until the end. Instead, Al-Mansour places the camera in one spot, and Lathan stares right into it as though it’s a mirror. She then shaves her entire head. It takes a while. Al-Mansour is not impatient. Violet goes through every emotion under the sun as she shaves her head. She weeps. She gasps with terror as she watches her hair fall away. She bursts out laughing. Sometimes she laughs and cries simultaneously. She’s also wasted. She goes through a catharsis so extreme that by the end of it, she is wrung dry. So are we.

One of the treats of the year was reviewing All About Nina for Rogerebert.com. Mary Elizabeth Winstead was phenomenal. This is my kind of performance.

Winstead does not hold back in portraying Nina’s more unsympathetic characteristics, her harshness, her horrible choices, her refusal to be vulnerable. Winstead does not keep one eye on us in the audience, hoping we will find her character “sympathetic.” She is beyond those concerns as an actress. She goes where Nina goes. This is a major performance.

Rupert Everett’s film The Happy Prince (which he directed and starred in) is a heartbreaking look at Oscar Wilde’s three final years. I reviewed for Rogerebert.com.

In an early scene, Wilde lounges in a grubby Parisian bed, staring with post-coital appreciation at the naked teenage prostitute standing by the window. Wilde moans, almost rapturously, “Our purple hours are sullied by green notes.” The boy smiles over at Wilde, accepting the older man’s gaze without judgment. Everett’s tone is partly regretful about the “green notes” and the “sullying”, but there’s a sharp note of relish in it, too. Maybe “purple hours” are best when backgrounded by squalor. It’s an extraordinarily textured moment, one of many in the film: it opens up its mysteries the longer you think about it.

For Film Comment, I wrote about The Canterville Ghost (my second piece in a row about – sort of – Oscar Wilde).

In his wildest dreams Oscar Wilde could never have imagined that an adaptation of his story would involve Charles Laughton straddling a gigantic unexploded mine as it’s dragged across the countryside by an American jeep.

For Rogerebert.com, I reviewed one of the best films of the year, Lee Chang-dong’s Burning.

“Burning” takes place in a world of fluctuating and amorphous borders, invisible yet pressing in on the characters. Jongsu’s village is on the border of North Korea, where the air is pierced with shrieking propaganda from a loudspeaker across the hills, creating a sense of emergency among the gentle pastoral landscape, like some attack is imminent, like something dreadful lurks beyond the horizon. Haemi’s cat is literally Schrodinger’s cat, caught in a borderland between being and non-being. The food vanishes, the litter box is full, but the cat never manifests. The phone rings repeatedly at Jongsu’s farm, but no one’s on the other end. Just empty space and dead air.

For Rogerebert.com, I did a roundup of the Indie Memphis Film Festival. I was a juror in the Hometowners category (films about Memphis, by Memphis filmmakers).

Although we loved everything we saw, our choice for best Hometowners Feature was unanimous. “Rukus,” directed by Memphis native Brett Hanover, is a queer coming-of-age story, I suppose, but beyond that, the film defies easy classification. Filmed over a 10-year period, “Rukus” blends documentary with fiction, and Hanover plays himself throughout (or versions of himself). Hanover details his fascination with the Furries subculture, and how that subculture introduced him to a mysterious kid from Florida who went by the online name “Rukus.” Structured somewhat like “Citizen Kane” at first, Hanover goes on a quest to find out more about Rukus, all as he himself deals with issues surrounding sexuality and identity. There isn’t a cliched frame in “Rukus”; it’s a singular vision.

The highlight of my year (along with my trip to Croatia) was giving a talk on Elvis’ movie career at The Circuit, the Memphis movie theatre Elvis used to rent out. My talk was introduced by Robert Gordon. To say this was a high watermark is to completely understate the situation.

Elvis is never the sexual aggressor in the Elvis Formula Movies. He is chased around by women in bikinis and in the end he has to choose. Or – as in the final scene in Spinout in 1966 – which has to be seen to be believed – he kisses each of the 3 candidates, all of whom are in wedding gowns, and then looks right in the camera and says, “I’m still single.”

For the L.A. Times, I reviewed Karina Longworth’s excellent book Seduction: Sex, Lies, and Stardom in Howard Hughes’s Hollywood.

Depending on whom you listen to, Hughes was a villain, a genius, a madman, sometimes all three simultaneously. His Hollywood career, in particular, is difficult to pin down. He strolls through so many Hollywood memoirs he takes on Zelig-like proportions. Is there anyone he didn’t meet, or date, or lock into a bungalow making her wait for her big break?

I interviewed director Alexander Baack about his beautiful and emotional new rom-com, You & Me, starring his wife (and co-screenwriter) Hillary Baack. Our interview ran the gamut, from Sally Struthers to D.D. Jackson, to my brother Brendan, to the issue of disability representation in film. You can rent the film on iTunes and elsewhere. It’s lovely.

“If you look up any article advocating for disabled actors representing themselves onscreen, and then you read the comments – the comments are shocking. People are not only resistant but angry at the idea. Hearing actors are cast to play deaf all the time, and in the deaf community it’s almost akin to blackface. They call it “deafface,” and they’re putting up with it less and less.”

I really loved Never Look Away, from German filmmaker Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, loosely based on the life of German painter Gerhard Richter. I reviewed for Rogerebert.com.

The more I think about “Never Look Away,” the more I think about it in terms of what it has to say about art and artistic expression, especially for those living in a totalitarian society. Art is always in the crosshairs. Art must be controlled: what can and cannot be said, as well as how things must be said. Ideologues demand that art should be uplifting, art must carry the ‘correct’ message, art must abolish ambiguity. What on earth would happen if artists were free to make the art they want to make? What would happen if it were left up to the viewer to decide the meaning?

I wrote the booklet essay for Arrow Video’s release of Woody Allen’s Another Woman, starring Gena Rowlands, reprinted on my site.

What is most extraordinary about Rowlands’ performance is the difference between Marion and the characters she played in her husband’s films, lonely outsider Minnie in “Minnie & Moskowitz,” Mabel, shattering into a psychotic break, in “A Woman Under the Influence,” tough-talking gun moll Gloria in “Gloria,” the desperate abandoned Sarah in “Love Streams,” and nutty alcoholic actress Myrtle in “Opening Night” (Worthwhile noting that in “Opening Night”, a film about a woman confronted by perhaps hallucinatory former and future selves, Myrtle is in the process of rehearsing a play for its Broadway opening, a play called “The Second Woman”.)

For Arrow Video again, I wrote the booklet essay for their release of Robert Altman’s Gosford Park. Also reprinted on my site.

When Ivor Novello entertains the guests at the piano with contemporary songs (the real-life Novello was also a composer), the reactions range from smiling tolerance to outright scorn. But the servants, drawn to the music, drift upstairs, loll on the dark staircases, huddle in nearby rooms, in a reverie of rapt listening. They are the future.

I cannot get Vox Lux out of my mind. I reviewed for Rogerebert.com.

There are many long scenes of people talking to each other, Celeste and her daughter, Celeste and Eleanor, Celeste and her manager. There’s not an uninteresting moment in the whole thing.

For the Criterion Collection, I wrote (and narrated) a couple of video-essays for their Ingmar Bergman’s Actors series. Two – one on Liv Ullmann and Bibi Andersson, and one on Ingrid Thulin – are now up on the landing page (one more still to launch). Go and watch and listen – they did a gorgeous job (as usual).

For Rogerebert.com’s 10 Best Films of 2018, I wrote on Alfonso Cuaron’s celebrated Roma.

Surrounding Cleo is a world of political upheaval, seething student protests, marital strife, economic stresses, and cops in riot gear. In another film, these events would be center stage, but in “Roma,” they drift in the background, seen through windows, heard through open doors, as Cleo strolls by, or around, trying to manage her own life, enduring stress and doing her best.

2018 In Memoriam

Actress Peggy Cummins. I wrote on her performance in Gun Crazy.

Cummins’ most frightening moment in Gun Crazy is not during the scenes where she manipulates Barton sexually and emotionally, or when she suddenly pulls a gun out on some unsuspecting citizen. Her most frightening moment is the chilly look she gives to Bart’s sister, while the duo is hiding out at her house.

Singer Dolores O’Riordan. Brief post here.

The Cranberries weren’t just huge. They were everywhere.

Actress Dorothy Malone, whom I wrote about for Film Comment later in the year (see above), and also on my site in tribute.

Her nameless character in The Big Sleep is one of the few truly liberated women in cinema.

Naomi Parker Fraley, the real-life inspiration for the famous Rosie the Riveter poster. I wrote about her on my site.

In March, 1942, a photo went out over the wire service of a woman in coveralls, hair wrapped up in a bandana, working on the factory floor at the Naval Air Station in Alameda, California.

Semper Fi, character actor R. Lee Ermey. Brief post on my site.

Casting AS storytelling: what Ermey presents IS the story. And he knows it in his bone marrow.

Editor Anne V. Coates, responsible for one of the most famous “cuts” in all of cinema, died this year, after an extraordinary six-plus-decade career. I had the great honor to write the narration for the tribute reel played at the Governors Awards when she won a Lifetime Achievement Oscar last year. I wrote about her on my site.

Coates’ work as an editor is so legendary and so respected, Scorsese cast her as an editor in The Aviator, briefly seen going through a mountain of film, wearing a teal-green/silver dress.

Legendary journalist/novelist Tom Wolfe. Post on my site.

That is what Tom Wolfe did in his first major piece “The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby,” a massive 50,000 word essay on a custom car show he attended in the early 1960s. He saw that something was happening, something seismic, a “something” no one was paying attention to. He saw that these so-called mechanics who created souped-up tailfinned cars were artists, as creative, as radical as Mondrian and Paul Klee and etc. and etc. And yet the New York art world would never, in a trillion years, consider a tail-finned tangerine-colored car a work of art. Tom Wolfe said, in 50,000 words, not so fast.

Elvis Presley’s first drummer, and recent Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductee, D.J. Fontana. Post on my site.

On “Jailhouse Rock” I love the bluntness of those opening double drum-beats, repeated. Classic! And he just keeps going with it. The underlying structure is really firm – necessary because in that song Elvis is on a rager. Fontana helps to allow him to do that.

Is any screenwriter more imitated than Shinobu Hashimoto, who died this year at the age of 100? Post on my site.

Rashomon is one of the most influential scripts ever written – especially when you consider how much it has been imitated, and how Rashomon itself – the concept of one story being told from many different points of view – has worked its way into the common lexicon.

The Queen of Soul. Post on my site.

What would the 20th century – and the 21st – be without her? Our world is incomprehensible without her. There’s that great quote about how heroes are those who “displace” things, the way a gigantic ship displaces water. Aretha Franklin was a great “displacer.’ Before, she wasn’t there. And then … she was there.

Great character actress Barbara Harris. Post on my site about the famous final scene in Nashville when she – a peripheral character – takes center stage.

The film ends with her. It is one of the great scenes in American film, and Altman – who tended to find his films as he shot them – knew that he had found his ending, found the scene that would continue on through the credits roll. You may think all along that Albuquerque is silly, or delusional, or maybe just a starry-eyed floozy. It doesn’t seem like she could be a “player” at all among the Nashville elite. But when her “chance” appears … she’s ready.

Along with my review of The Last Movie Star (see above), I wrote a tribute to him when he died, and I also wrote a short piece about how Reynolds used his angles like a supermodel.

People mention [his performance in] Boogie Nights all the time, and yes, it was great to see him play a role with some substance. But unfortunately it’s indicative of a tendency in the critical world to gravitate towards the “serious” as more worthy, less embarrassing to love. Well, I don’t subscribe to that.

Broadway superstar Marin Mazzie. Way too young. It’s tragic. Voices like hers don’t come along that often. Post on my site, highlighting one of her live performances.

She has clearly worked on the song – but the performance shows the song working on her (she allows it to work on her), and the implications of the lyrics grow more and more powerful for her.

Great character actor Scott Wilson. He will be missed. Post on my site.

Good character actors are like clutch hitters or closing pitchers. You gotta come up BIG and you have to do it under pressure with very little time. There are many scenes in G.I. Jane showing her struggles to prove herself, to keep up with the men, to break down stereotypes… but in that scene with Scott Wilson you see what she – and all of us – are really up against. That’s how you play a scene.

A staple in my childhood home, Hee Haw host Roy Clark. Post with tons of clips on my site.

I had no idea what he was famous for. Later, I would learn.

Actress Michele Carey. Post on my site.

I cherish her for her performance in Live a Little, Love a Little, a totally forgotten film, one that is – as Jeremy Richey says – ripe for rediscovery.

Croatia Travelogue

My trip to Croatia was “the substance of things hoped for.” I wrote it up in moment-to-moment detail in a series of picture-heavy posts on my site. I will never forget it.

Miscellaneous

Here are a number of pieces I’ve written on my site.

35 Random Facts About Me

Essay on one of the greatest performances I’ve ever seen.

Mitchell and I discuss Barbra Streisand and Bette Davis.

Post on Bruce McGill, one of my favorite actors.

Transcript of Mitchell’s monologue on “The Tao of Barbra,” leading up to the release of the new A Star is Born.

On Alain Delon: Eyes so deep there’s no bottom.

On influential acting teacher and director Erwin Piscator.

Post on Ingmar Bergman’s 100th birthday.

Post on choreographer and director Bob Fosse.

Posted in James Joyce, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments