Graceland Detail of the Day #8

A little side table in the billiard room. With the paisley fabric walls (and ceiling).

Posted in Personal | Tagged | 2 Comments

Graceland Detail of the Day #7

The clear cupboard in the kitchen.

Posted in Personal | Tagged | Leave a comment

50 Best Albums, by Brendan O’Malley, #1

My talented brother Brendan O’Malley is an amazing writer and actor. He’s wonderful in the recent You & Me, directed by Alexander Baack. (I interviewed Baack about the film here.) His most recent gig was story editor/writer on the hit series Survivor’s Remorse. Brendan hasn’t blogged in years, but the “content” (dreaded word) is so good I asked if I could import some of it to my blog. I thought it would be fun to put up some of the stuff here. So we’ll start with his list of 50 Best Albums. I’ll put up one every Monday.

Brendan’s list of 50 Best Albums is part music-critique and part memoir and part cultural snapshot. I can’t believe we’ve come to the end! Here is the full archive.

To those of you who have been loving Bren’s music essays, there’s more to come from off his old blog. I’ll continue posting them every Monday!

50 Best Albums, by Brendan O’Malley

1. Your Favorite Artist – Your Favorite Album

Here we are at long last. The last entry on the Top 50 Greatest Albums. As I’ve said before, this is not a list in any kind of order. I rifled through the collection randomly and picked out whatever struck me as an album to highlight for that particular day. If I started over I might wind up with a completely different list altogether.

We’ve all heard that fun apocalyptic question, “If you were stranded on a desert isle, what is the one album you would choose?”

The irony in this weighty hypothetical is that we ARE STRANDED ON THE PLANET. We are on our island and we have an infinite number of albums to choose from. When you think about what you might want to be stranded with, you could do a lot worse than lil’ ol’ Planet Earth. I have been trying to cultivate a new sense of gratitude and wonder and this list has been a big part of that.

How lucky am I that I own such a wide swath of seemingly disconnected music? If you look at this list without thinking about it, you might think that 50 random strangers were each allowed one choice. There is no overlying theme, no sense of singularity to this list. And the variety of what is out there to choose from is expanding exponentially at an almost frightening rate.

A mere decade ago, digital recording was still quite expensive and unavailable to the home enthusiast. Now? Any musician with a healthy dose of perfectionism can create their very own masterpiece. Where will this trend be in thirty more years? Will we have direct links to our brainwaves so that once a creative stream is isolated it can be manifested merely through thought? Could happen.

I once dreamed that I was in a strange lush green atmosphere where an idyllic lawn was broken up all around me, like in a Picasso cubist fantasy. I sat at a collage of a grand piano in a tuxedo and all around me an orchestra responded to my improvisation. To this date, it is still my most treasured musical memory and it NEVER HAPPENED.

Could I retrieve that memory and make it a reality? Do we all have symphonies raging away inside of us just waiting for a chance to be heard? I would say it is more likely than unlikely. I would say that even the most depraved and violent and evil of us have our own personal soundtrack of music that only we could create. To be moving towards a time when those sounds will be more and more accessible is, to a music lover like myself, staggeringly exciting.

Today in the mail I received the latest album by my best friend Justin. It is called The Bassoon Years and it contains a song called “Sui Generis” that he wrote in honor of my father who recently passed away. This album would have gotten a separate entry if it had come a bit earlier but that just hammers my point home even further.

Justin has been a de-facto O’Malley for decades and something of a son-by-proxy. If Justin and I had been alive during any other period of recorded or unrecorded history I would not have been able to listen to this song, unless he were singing it to me himself. So when people talk about how technology numbs people or leaves them less communicative I say they have a funny way of looking at a full glass and imagining it to be half empty.

So here, perched atop this jalopy of a joyride of a musical Top 50 list, I invite you to tell me what you would take with you.

— Brendan O’Malley
Top 50 List
Begun Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Finished Friday May 22, 2009

Posted in Music | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Year in Review: Running my mouth in 2019

Thanks, everyone, who hangs out here, who likes what I do, whether you’re an Elvis fan, a Supernatural fan, a general cinephile, a book-lover, or just someone who’s been checking in periodically for 17 years – WHAT? – I appreciate your presence, I appreciate your comments!

Here are some of the things I wrote in the year 2018, for many different outlets, as well as for my own site.

My “Present Tense” column at Film Comment

I launched the column with an essay about Frank O’Hara and his love of the movies.

He makes his case: “It’s true that fresh air is good for the body / but what about the soul that grows in darkness embossed by silvery images.” This is one of the most accurate depictions in literature of what actually goes on “in the movies.”

The fun of this column is “sky’s the limit” in terms of subject matter. It’s basically: Shit I’ve Always Wanted to Write About. Thank you, Film Comment, for validating my weird brain. For the second installment of the column I wrote about the sexual/romantic tension between Hicks and Ripley in Aliens.

Eyes glinting with flirty mischief and intimacy, he sends her off with, “Don’t be gone long, Ellen.” It’s as though they’re suddenly in bed, in a world where they could be who they want to be to each other.

In the third installment, I wrote about Marlon Brando’s physicality, as expressed so perfectly by David Foster Wallace in Infinite Jest.

When Brando was at his best, everything was in proportion. You don’t sense effort. Most crucially, Brando underlined nothing. His instincts led him into opposition. This wasn’t just bratty anti-authoritarianism. This was actor-as-tuning-fork to his own sense of truth. A conventional actor might shout an angry line. Brando would whisper it, turning the scene on its ear.

Next, I wrote about Martin Scorsese’s Rolling Thunder Revue and Walt Whitman’s bicentennial. Both.

In the poem “The Wound-Dresser,” Whitman describes his experiences working in a Civil War hospital, and how he remained “impassive” with the wounded and yet “deep in my breast a fire, a burning flame.” Sam Shepard, reminiscing about the healing effect of the Rolling Thunder tour on audiences, says, “Rock and roll is a kind of medicine.” A “wound-dresser” for a hurting America.

I wrote about the never-before-seen material in Sylvia Plath’s recently published full correspondence, which shows – for the first time – the extent of her cinephilia.

For the first time, Plath is revealed as an adventurous and voracious moviegoer. She lived in a very exciting era for film, coming of age in the 1950s. While the “football romances” were, indeed, depressing, the 1950s also saw the influx of foreign films onto American soil, Japanese, French, Swedish, Russian, with art houses proliferating, these movies providing glimpses into other cultures and new ways of seeing. Plath was an active participant in all of it, joining the Film Society while studying at Cambridge on a Fulbright scholarship, sometimes seeing as many as three movies a day.

I wrote about Tom Noonan’s harrowing film about urban loneliness, What Happened Was.

Jackie and Michael come into the date with compromised emotional immune systems. Whatever resilience they may have had once is long gone. “That which does not kill you makes you stronger” is a lie, or at least a “fiction” parroted by people who have been privileged enough not to know real suffering. There’s something pathological and, dare I say, capitalistic, about the phrase. Being “strong” isn’t the only positive value in life. “That which does not kill you” can kill other things, too, things like vulnerability, humor, the capacity to connect with others—in short, the things that make life worth living.

I wrote about the glorious “back-ting” tradition, actors who can convey an entire story with their backs to the camera. Examples abound.

In his lonely back, we can see his terrible awareness of the brutal life he has lived and what it has cost him.

I wrote about Dennis Hopper’s raging punk rock manifesto, Out of the Blue, a long-forgotten and hard-to-see film, now restored and (I’m sure) soon to be available.

As CeBe, Linda Manz gives one of the great teenage performances of all time.

This was something that had been percolating for a long long time. I wanted to write about how people who come out of comedy, improv or sketch, often make the greatest dramatic actors, blowing away their “serious” counterparts. And so I finally wrote about it.

Watch Wiig in Bridesmaids and then watch Hateship Loveship, Welcome to Me, and Skeleton Twins in succession. Each character is so distinct it’s like Wiig swaps out her soul for each role. (The last three films all came out in 2014, and the fact that Wiig didn’t get more accolades for these transformations—none of which involved radical shifts in appearance or self-congratulatory weight-loss/gain—is evidence of how actors known for comedy aren’t taken as seriously as their dramatic counterparts). Throw in Wiig’s lunatic Saturday Night Live sketch “Liza Minnelli Turns Off a Lamp” to get the full picture of her gift. I think Wiig is one of the best actresses working today.

I focused on Matthias Schoenaerts’ ongoing explorations of his characters’ tormented bound-up masculinity. He’s really untouchable. He’s going where Brando went, where De Niro went. It’s a place only men can go. He’s giving us insider information. Without protecting himself.

The moment is so vulnerable and lonely it’s almost unwatchable. Jacky’s world is comfortless. Schoenaerts often plays such men.

I wrote about awesome death scenes in cinema. This was super fun and it exploded on Twitter. I couldn’t keep up with all the replies, people sharing their favorite deaths scenes. It was great!

Child actors often toss themselves into death scenes with fearless gusto. I call this the “Bang Bang You’re Dead” School of Acting. Watch the swan dives of children playing cops and robbers in the backyard and you’ll see total commitment to the imaginary.

It was a great pleasure to interview director Brett Hanover about Rukus, his slightly unclassifiable documentary-video-diary-narrative feature, which we had awarded Best Features in the Hometowners category last year at Indie Memphis. You should all see Rukus. He’s released it online.

?I never wanted you to forget you were watching a re-enactment. I wanted that alienation effect. You’re trusting it as a document of something, of some version of these real events, but also as a document of the re-enactment process.”

I had fun writing about memorable experiences seeing movies in a theatre in a packed house. For me, there’s nothing like it. I’m so glad I saw Wolf of Wall Street (just one example) surrounded by a crowd.

In the final standoff with the Nazis, the tension in the theater was palpable, and everyone burst into applause as Bergman and Grant made their getaway. It was an exhilarating turn-around. Notorious is one of my favorite movies, and re-watching it now is enriched by the memory of that Film Forum audience.

I wrote about Michael Rymer’s 1995 film Angel Baby, which has haunted me for decades, ever since I saw it during its first release. It’s streaming now (after long unavailability). You should see it.

The intimacy these actors create with each other is so visceral you can almost smell it. The final 20 minutes of the film is so harrowing I have remembered it almost shot for shot, even though I haven’t seen it since 1995.

Although it feels mean to “pick favorites” among my columns (thus far), this one – about the “tomboy films” of the 1970s – is probably my favorite.

They were scrappy street urchins. They talked like gangsters. Sometimes they were actual criminals. They smoked cigarettes. They sassed authority figures, and when told to knock it off, they sassed even more. They flipped the world the bird. They were the smartest person in any room, even though they were between the ages of 9 and 14, and even though they were girls. Theirs was an ongoing act of civil disobedience against the limits imposed on girls, the idea that girls should behave one way, boys another.

I will never be done talking about Kristen Stewart. It’s been an ongoing theme, and so I figured I’d address it in the column.

There’s a part of her that always seems a little bit uncomfortable being looked at, but what is special about Stewart—and not often remarked-upon—is that she doesn’t try to combat this. She doesn’t try to correct it. She just lets us see that part of her. She lets us see her discomfort and shyness. This is where her magic really lies.

I wrote about Sophia Takal’s first two films, Green (2011) and Always Shine (2016).

This is what Takal is after: what things feel like, the peril in relationships, in bonding, in intimacy, particularly for women. Miscommunication, jealousy, social pressures, create a pressure cooker environment where freedom is impossible. This is mostly the realm of melodrama, not kitchen-sink realism, but it’s also the realm of horror, and both Green and Always Shine read as horror films, although the horror is hard to point to.

Reviews/Interviews/Etc.

I wrote about Into Invisible Light, a film written and directed by Shelagh Carter.

The best way I can put it is that Into Invisible Light is a movie for grownups. It’s not about the first flush of hope. It’s a movie about flawed human people with some miles on them, miles where things have been dropped along the way, things they all thought were lost forever.

I reviewed the Polish documentary Communion, an incredible directorial debut from Anna Zamecka.

The camera doesn’t rove around the room looking for conflict, for reaction shots, to “up” the tension, all of the technical tropes that have seeped into the culture via reality television. Zamecka’s approach enforces a certain amount of distance from her subjects. We can see it all, how overworked Ola is, how helpless Marek is, how on top of one another they are in that apartment.

I reviewed The Heiresses for Ebert.

Chela is so weighted down at the start of the film that the lightening of her mood is wonderful to see but it’s also alarming. Hope brings with it the possibility of heartbreak, and Brun draws you totally into that experience, with little to no explanatory dialogue. What a remarkable performance.

I reviewed my friend Larry Clarke’s wonderful directorial debut 3 Days with Dad (he also wrote the script), featuring a murderer’s row of talented actors.

Bob is screaming, the kids are screaming, they’re moving him and his IV drip across the room and it’s MAYHEM. It’s funny but it’s also not. No one can prepare you for a moment like that. It’s unimaginable until it is upon you.

I wrote about Sounder for Film Comment.

Winfield and Tyson, with no dialogue, suggest the intimacy and heat between this couple, how connected they are. When Nathan comes home after serving his sentence, there’s a moment where they catch eyes over the kids’ heads, longing to finally be alone together. In these scenes is the rich texture of life. It feels more authentic than an uninterrupted parade of misery. Or, to put it another way: the joy is as real as the misery.

I absolutely loved Ruben Brandt, Collector and had a blast writing my review.

With a fast-paced story spanning the globe, and images like a fluidly-undulating art-literate acid flashback, “Ruben Brandt, Collector” is like “To Catch a Thief” as filtered through the multi-eyeballed gaze of Joan Miró, or “The Pink Panther” as imagined by Pablo Picasso.

I reviewed Tamara Jenkins’ Private Life for Film Comment.

Infertility—like old age—is a topic many people don’t want to look at. It cuts too close to home and provokes all kinds of conflicting feelings, especially in a culture that so prizes parenthood and—especially—motherhood as the be-all and end-all of female experience. This is one of the many reasons Private Life feels almost dangerous. It’s stepping into new ground. It’s opening a long-closed door.

I loved Gaspar Noe’s Climax. I reviewed for Ebert.

The dancers come from all walks of life, but everyone goes down with the ship, clinging to their final shreds of sanity. There’s a mournfulness in all of this: “Climax” is haunted by the joy of the first dance.

I wrote about Robert Flaherty’s influential (for good or ill) documentary Man of Aran for Film Comment.

The shark hunt is followed by a sequence where the men row home in the teeth of a storm, the currach buffeted by the waves. It was as dangerous as it looks.

I reviewed Sebastián Lelio’s Gloria Bell – an American remake of his own movie – for Ebert.

Gloria and Arnold don’t so much “hit it off” as they decide to try each other on. They have sex, they talk, he reads her a poem, they play paintball. Meanwhile, life goes on, and the “life goes on” aspect of “Gloria Bell” is one of its distinguishing characteristics.

I interviewed Dan Callahan about his book The Art of American Screen Acting, Volume 2.

Callahan: Pacino is so in touch with evil, and he didn’t need to be. He could have done cute victim parts, which he did in Scarecrow. But his actual interest is the underside of being cute and seductive which is: this cute seductive person might be evil. In The Local Stigmatic, he plays more of a small-time crook than Michael Corleone and yet it’s more concentrated in a way because it’s a short film. The Godfather is Pacino’s great statement on evil.

Upon hearing the news that the upcoming season of Supernatural (the 15th) would be its last, I wrote a long essay about how I “tripped over” the series and how my obsession was born.

The third episode was when I felt some familiar … stirrings. Stirrings of personal investment. A layer of complexity was added to what I was seeing. There was a mournfulness in episode 3 that I responded to, a deepening of this Dean character.

I reviewed the appalling The Haunting of Sharon Tate for Ebert.

In an insidious way, Farrands’ approach—these alternate versions where Tate gets to act “heroically”blames the victim. It suggests: Couldn’t Tate have shown more “agency” that night? What if she had fought back? Wouldn’t it have been great if Sharon had been more “badass” in the face of her impending death? If only she had listened to her intuition, maybe she wouldn’t have been murdered. Alternate histories can be extremely cathartic. But not like this.

I really loved Wild Nights with Emily, and had a lot of fun writing my review for Ebert.

Olnek takes one of the many Emily Dickinson theories – that the famous “spinster recluse” had a lifelong love affair with Susan Gilbert, her childhood friend and eventual sister-in-law – and runs with it, has fun with it, flings open the doors, letting in light and passion and life. This could have been a dreadfully dreary affair if the approach had been didactic. In Olnek’s hands, it’s a romp, but it’s a romp with real bite.

I reviewed Suzannah Herbert and Lauren Belfer’s documentary Wrestle.

It’s not just about wrestling. The team practices have a sense of real urgency, they’re like military drills, getting the boys ready for compat under fire. It’s life or death.

I interviewed director Lian Lunson about her beautiful film Waiting for the Miracle to Come, starring Willie Nelson and Charlotte Rampling and Sophie Lowe. Shot entirely on Willie Nelson’s ranch in Texas.

Lian Lunson: I feel very honored and privileged and lucky that these people allowed me to make Miracle. It’s very hard to make a film like this these days. The films I love – films like Ponette and Baghdad Cafe … these films leave you with something. The people who allowed me to make Miracle knew it would be a challenge, but they helped me to do it. That doesn’t happen very often. Without them, I would never have gotten to do it.

I wrote the cover story for the May-June 2019 issue of Film Comment, on Joanna Hogg’s The Souvenir.

It’s the romanticism of being in an artistic headspace, of putting yourself and your dreams and passions out there for people to see. Julie stands off to the side, looking on at what she has created. All of these people have come together to bring her vision to fruition. Collaboration like this is its own addiction.

I reviewed Joe Berlinger’s Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Vile and Evil for Ebert.

As Ted Bundy, Efron gets to use his natural assets—his face, his body, his charisma—and he gets to use them full-bore. Often really beautiful actors feel the need to “ugly” themselves up in order to be taken seriously. Efron so far has resisted. He has old-school movie star wattage and an ability to project his essence through the screen. Using his animal charm in service of Ted Bundy is so disturbing, but it works in subtextual ways, providing the “missing piece” when people ask why and how Bundy could have happened.

For Criterion’s “Songbook” column, I wrote about the use of “Love is Strange” in Terrence Malick’s Badlands.

In “Nebraska,” Bruce Springsteen imagines the story from Starkweather’s point of view, paraphrasing what the killer actually said after he was caught, “I can’t say that I’m sorry for the things that we done / At least for a little while, sir, me and her, we had us some fun.” Staring at those words, the mind goes blank. In that blankness lies Badlands.

For Oscilloscope’s Musings blog, I wrote about a long-standing obsession: scenes where men look at themselves in the mirror.

Francis Ford Coppola’s epic, Apocalypse Now begins with a hallucinatory sequence showing a PTSD-rattled Martin Sheen, holed up in a hotel room in Saigon, tormented by memories. In one shocking moment, Sheen stands unsteadily, and lurches around in front of the mirror, flailing his arms out in imitation martial-arts moves, an attempt to combat his helplessness and anguish, his impotence. But the gap between reality and fantasy is too great, and he, like Richard III, smashes the mirror.

I wrote about the really good Mouthpiece for Rogerebert.com. Check this movie out!

Needing characters—particularly female characters—to be strong all the time is just as limiting as any other kind of stereotype. Being vulnerable is not being weak. Not knowing what to do is not being weak. It’s being human. In an increasingly corporatized world, where franchises suck up all the oxygen, where small personal films can barely get made anymore, “Mouthpiece” vibrates with the urgency behind its shared expression.

For Film Comment (and the anniversary of D-Day), I wrote about John Ford’s great war film They Were Expendable.

They Were Expendable is the kind of film where all you have to do is scan the faces of everyone on screen—the stars, the co-stars and the extras—to see the stakes of war.

Again for Film Comment, I wrote about the smokin-white-hot sexual chemistry in Love Crazy and The More the Merrier.

It’s clear that Mr. Dingle takes one look at Connie, one look at Joe, and perceives that they need each other and want each other. He goes to great and sometimes annoying lengths to force these two lonely characters to damn the torpedoes and go full speed ahead, right into bed.

I reviewed Rick Alverson’s latest, the pitiless The Mountain, which I can’t say I “enjoyed” – the subject matter is bleak and hopeless – but it’s definitely worth watching.

Moving from one isolated institution to the next, Fiennes’ car drives along lonely roads, bordered by ranks of trees, highlighting the fact that the people in these institutions have been removed from society. Anything can be done to them and nobody would know.

I reviewed Jennifer Kent’s The Nightingale. I did not care for it at all. People were like, “It’s tough to watch.” I was like, “Yeah, because it’s not good.” The Babadook ravaged my SOUL and I still reference it in my head all the time, so I’m on her side. But have to call it like I see it. Other films have covered the same subject matter far better. Other women were saying to me, in response to my review: “Did you and I see the same film??” Well, yes. We did. But we had different responses. I know. It’s unbelievable. Women are not a monolith.

The issue is the subtext-less script. Having no subtext flattens out the action, creating a same-ness in the scene progression. Part of this feels appropriate to the lead character’s PTSD; she is traumatized beyond nuanced responses. But somehow, when translated into visual form, the effect is deadening. The script has this weird mix of rigidity and flabbiness, especially in the final sequences which are repetitive and stagnant.

One of the most pleasant surprises of the year for me was The Peanut Butter Falcon, which I reviewed for Ebert. Ignore the bad title of the film. This is a lovely and emotional fable. I loved it.

Unlike so many disabled characters in film, Zac is not utilized as a symbol, a metaphor, or created to be “inspirational.” He’s the central figure, he’s outspoken and strong, funny and vulnerable. He’s never had a friend before. He’s always wanted to be “bro dawgs” with someone. Watching the relationship develop with Tyler is one of the film’s many pleasures.

Casey Affleck’s feature film directorial debut Light of my Life was kind of ignored. I’m not sure why. Because people think he should be “cancelled”? I don’t know. Because I thought this was quite good, and haunting in this quiet traumatized way. I really responded to it. I reviewed for Ebert.

Whatever the case may be, it occurred to me that in this script Affleck was “working out” his thoughts on what men have done with the world and who they are (this includes himself), how their “anger” and “loneliness”—as the father calls it—manifest in monstrous ways. Girls, as always, are in the crosshairs.

I reviewed the sweetly wistful and surprisingly perceptive documentary Jawline, which I really loved. I showed it to Allison, too, and we had a wonderful time watching it and talking about it.

“Jawline” works gently, slowly, presenting its subject and sub-culture with not just affection but sympathy, a sympathy very close to tenderness.

I really loved Ms. Purple. I know there’s so much released now it’s hard to remember things, but flag this as one to check out.

“Ms. Purple” is a beautiful film about two siblings, damaged from their childhoods, lost in their young adulthoods, but bound together by family ties, for better or worse.

Chained for Life is SO GOOD. One of the treats of the year for me was getting to review this sprawling ensemble film, a la Altman, which is funny, serious, thought-provoking, entertaining – it’s a really BIG movie.

Schimberg’s touch is very light, but the film reaches the depths, not despite his light touch, but because of it.

I reviewed the visually ravishing Monos for Ebert. It’s making a lot of people’s Top 10 lists. Not mine, but you may feel differently. It definitely should be seen.

This is the story of what happens to kids in war, what happens to the mind under a kind of brainwashing, especially a susceptible teenage mind. If “mercy” is seen as weak, if the group decides “mercy” is bad, it’s very difficult to go against that grain, to maintain your sense of humanity. This is how “peer pressure” works in its most sinister state.

The Death of Dick Long laid me FLAT. It’s been a long time since I’ve laughed that hard during a film. And it was all behavioral and situational. I mean, the title alone … I really recommend this one. I reviewed for Ebert.

The back seat of his car is drenched in Dick’s blood, and how Zeke ends up “handling” this is so dim-witted it’s almost admirable.

I wrote about The Wolf of Wall Street, #6 on Ebert’s Top 25 Films of the 2010s. You can check out the full list here, and read a bunch of great essays about each film.

“The Wolf of Wall Street” is very funny, but the world it shows is a mirage, the shimmering illusion of the American dream, in all its rapacity, unfairness, and gross misconduct. The cream doesn’t rise to the top. The bad guys often triumph. They’re stronger. Their amorality protects them.

I reviewed the documentary Recorder: The Marion Stokes Project, an unexpectedly moving documentary which starts out being about this one very eccentric woman, and then morphs into something else altogether. I loved it.

The fantasy is that with the internet, everything can be saved and found, everything is available. This is so far from the truth it’s outrageous that people still seem to believe it.

I reviewed Queen & Slim for Rogerebert.com.

Archetypes are used for a reason: archetypes are symbols, not individualized characters, archetypes represent the hopes, dreams, fears, hatreds, of a community. They’re more like projector screens than people. When used correctly—as they are here—archetypes contain tremendous emotional power.

I reviewed the latest from the Safdie brothers, Uncut Gems, starring Adam Sandler, in one of THE performances of the year – with a great supporting cast: Julia Fox, a terrifying Eric Bogosian, Judd Hirsch, Kevin Garnett as himself and LaKeith Stanfield, who continues to surprise me with his versatility. (He’s great in Knives Out too.)

Howard’s black opal is the same as any long-besought gem: it emanates a magical pull on all who look upon it. Its power is almost wholly symbolic.

I reviewed Terrence Malick’s A Hidden Life for Film Comment.

Everyone hopes they will behave like Franz, will see the forces of evil rising around them and resist. The question is trickier when a guillotine awaits you at the end of a dark hall.

For Rogerebert.com’s Top 10 Films of 2019, I wrote about Joanna Hogg’s The Souvenir.

Transformation is not neat, linear, or controllable. Being in love bleeds into every aspect of life. It’s the most important thing. But art is also the most important thing. Being free to make the art you want to make is paramount. Compartmentalization is not possible. At a certain point, it all merges together.

2019 In Memoriam

I wrote a tribute to Nicolas Roeg in Film Comment.

Many of the directors’s films received baffled or outright irritated reviews. Audiences sometimes recoiled from the challenges of his visuals. Roeg calls us out on our dirty minds, our voyeurism, making us admit things we might not want to acknowledge. The films were often marketed incorrectly, and Roeg had a lot to say about the damage that caused: “Any change in form produces a fear of change, and that has accelerated.” There was nothing “familiar” about Roeg’s work, and it is only with time that we can perceive the enormity of its influence.

Here’s my tribute to drummer Honey Lantree.

Karen Carpenter also said that when she saw The Honeycombs on The Ed Sullivan Show, it inspired her to become a drummer.

One-hit wonder? Okay. But you never know “how far that little candle throws his beams.”

Beloved poet Mary Oliver died. Like millions of others, I have a very personal relationship with her work.

There’s always a moment when her poems flash into transcendence, like when a gliding swan suddenly rears back stretching out its wings. It has that feeling to it.

Experimental filmmaker Jonas Mekas died. I wrote a little bit about the footage he shot of Elvis’ concerts at Madison Square Garden in 1972.

He did not record the sound. He did not try to sync anything up. He said, “Some of it was filmed normal 24fps speed, some not.”

Known mostly for her role in Creature from the Black Lagoon, I love Julie Adams for her performance in the meta-esque Elvis movie Tickle Me.

Julie Adams understood genre, how it operated, what was required of her as an actress. She had fun with all of it. In Tickle Me she is charming and funny, she creates a believable character (in a completely ridiculous context), and highlights him gorgeously, giving him something to play off of. She understood everything. She also understood the most important thing was: if you are lucky enough to have any kind of career at all in show biz … ENJOY IT.

I will miss knowing George Klein is out there. I wrote about him on my site.

He was one of Elvis’ pallbearers. True inner circle (and it was a very small circle).

R.I.P. Stanley Donen, legendary director of Singin’ in the Rain (and other classics). Tribute on my site.

During his time with us, he was asked, “How do you direct Audrey Hepburn and not fall in love with her?”

He replied, “You don’t.”

New Wave before there even WAS a French New Wave, Agnes Varda has left a hole in the cinematic landscape that nobody else can fill. We will never get over missing her. I wrote about her working with Sandrine Bonnaire in Vagabond.

Varda didn’t “help” Bonanaire give the great performance she did in Vagabond. That’s a misunderstanding of the relationship between director and actress. But Varda made one comment, one very pointed comment early on, which ended up being the thing that gave Bonnaire her “way in” to the character.

Character actor George Morfogen is a family fave, mainly because of his one line in What’s Up, Doc?: “What kind of wine are you serving at Table One?” Tribute on my site.

I love that his arc in They All Laughed basically sums up to: “Infidelity is sometimes okay.”

R.I.P. Bibi Andersson. One of the greatest actresses to ever practice the craft. I wrote a tribute on my site. I also wrote and narrated a video essay for Criterion on Ingmar Bergman’s collaborations with Liv Ullmann and Bibi Andersson.

The murder of Lyra McKee continues to be a devastating almost incomprehensible loss. So furious.

Born in Belfast, right off socalled “Murder Mile,” she was of the generation that came of age post Good Friday Agreement (she was killed on the 21st anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement). She had a perceptive take on the challenges and struggles of the “Ceasefire Babies,” those of her generation raised in the aftermath of decades of terror and violence (centuries, really), when all of it was supposedly “over” but … it wasn’t over, not really.

When John Singleton died, at the way too young age of 51, the writers at Rogerebert.com each contributed something for a group tribute.

There’s one sequence in “Boyz N the Hood” which has wiggled its way into my subconscious, the way scenes or moments in film sometimes do. They become part of the texture of your life, how you think, the references you make. Moments like the “dueling anthems” scene in “Casablanca”, or the husband-and-wife reunion scene in “Sounder,” or the painful Fredo-Michael scene in “Godfather II (“I’m your older brother, Mike!”).

I wrote about Hollywood icon and quadruple threat Doris Day.

She was like Ella Fitzgerald or Frank Sinatra in that she wasn’t “just” a singer. She was one of the instruments in the orchestra, she was a conductor. Her singing – the tone, the beautiful elongation of her phrasing, where she chose to breathe, all of it – was an act of pure musicianship.

This one hurt. Nick Tosches died. Books to read: his biographies of Jerry Lee Lewis, Dean Martin, Sonny Liston, but there’s so much more. One of my favorite writers.

Dean Martin is forever changed for all time because of how Tosches wrote about him.

Coming quickly on the heels of the death of Nick Tosches was the death of legendary producer Robert Evans, whose book The Kid Stays in the Picture is a stone-cold classic.

To Evans, there was only one “business”, and that’s the business of making movies. The Kid Stays In the Picture is one of the great movie-business books of all time.

French New Wave legend, muse to a generation, wonderful actress and director, Anna Karina died at the age of 79. I will miss knowing she’s out there. I wrote a brief thing on my site.

Karina could be vivacious but could then be totally remote a second later. She could break your heart. She could draw you to her, while at the same time something in you might hold back, intimidated, frightened.

Miscellaneous

Here are a number of pieces I’ve written on my site.

I wrote about Nick Nolte’s deep DEEP vulnerability.

His social self vanishes, he flat-lines, and then something else – hard to say what it is exactly – takes its place. Nolte isn’t doing any of this to “show” us something. Honestly, it barely appears to be a “choice”. Nolte’s unconcsious, his instincts, his emotional availability, at the wheel. The unnameable thing in Nolte’s eyes IS the character.

“Is your dad here?” I wrote about a small moment from Eighth Grade, which says so much.

Later, you hear the mom off-screen scolding her husband for bringing the cake down too early, and the argument gets toxic almost immediately. So in 5 minutes you get the whole picture of this woman’s whole life.

I went down the rabbit hole, starting from this shot in Inherent Vice.

For whatever reason, I was so struck by this woman in the ocean. I wondered about her life. Had she run away? Was she okay? Where did she live? Ironically: the picture shows her in a state of bliss. But I felt anxious looking at it.

I wrote about Maggie Smith’s astonishing performance in Bed Among the Lentils.

In “Bed Among the Lentils,” Maggie Smith IS feeling everything but the context of the character – a very unreliable narrator – means the only emotion that is actually visible to the naked eye is a kind of coiled contempt swimming in a sea of existential boredom.

I reviewed Ernest Hilbert’s latest poetry collection, Last One Out.

Sometimes he finds equilibrium, trembling there, but it’s always slightly unstable, there’s always a pull one way or the other. A jar of fireflies “flash silent broadsides at our porch,” close enough to touch and yet also as distant as far-away “constellations of cold light.” Is there nothing in the vast space between?

I wrote about one of the scenes in Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite, one of the best films of the year.

It’s hard to make an audience start laughing and then stop laughing and segue into a whole different kind of experience, at the exact moment when you need them to.

I wrote about reading James Joyce’s short story “A Painful Case,” in Dubliners. I’d read it before but I must have blocked it out. The story threw me off for days. Very unnerving.

A pause to take note of the simplicity of his language. Nothing fancy. “He began to feel ill at ease.”

A piece I wrote about Sucker Punch and Gold Diggers of 1933 is included in an anthology of writings from the “Musings” blog over at Oscilloscope Laboratories. You can order it here. (There are two volumes. Honored to be included!)

Every Monday, I’ve been posting essays written by my brother Brendan O’Malley, from his 50 Best Albums list on his old blog. They’re an amazing archive of writing and thought and insight.

Posted in Actors, James Joyce, Movies, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Present Tense: On director Sophia Takal

I had wanted to write something on Takal’s first two films, Green and Always Shine, long before I had even heard of her Black Christmas remake. I was turned onto her work when I was assigned to review Always Shine for Ebert. I went back and watched Green, her first film, which is barely over an hour long, and explores much of the same territory. Takal’s territory in these two films are like catnip for Sheila. I did not really care for Black Christmas (I love the original, though!), but I think Takal is an important voice and sensibility, and I look forward to seeing whatever she does next.

For my next column at Film Comment, I wrote about Takal and Green and Always Shine, two films which mark Takal as not just an important voice, but a new and exciting visual stylist.

Screengrab Library

From Green (2011)

Written and directed by Sophia Takal. Starring Takal, Kate Lyn Sheil and Lawrence Michael Levine


Sophia Takal in “Green”


Sophia Takal and Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”


Sophia Takal and Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”


Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”


Sophia Takal, Lawrence Michael Levine, and Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”


Lawrence Michael Levine, Kate Lyn Sheil and Sophia Takal in “Green”


Lawrence Michael Levine and Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”


Sophia Takal and Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”. Or maybe it’s the other way around. That’s the point.


Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”. This is one of those long dissolves I talk about in the piece, where the landscape bleeds into the figures.


Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”. Everything dissolving.


Kate Lyn Sheil in “Green”.

From Always Shine (2017)

Written by Lawrence Michael Levine. Directed by Sophia Takal. Starring Caitlin FitzGerald and Mackenzie Davis. Lawrence Michael Levine plays a small role. Jane Addams shows up as well.


Caitlin FitzGerald in “Always Shine”


Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


Caitlin FitzGerald in “Always Shine”


Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


One of the many many mirror shots in “Always Shine”


Caitlin FitzGerald and Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”. Again: one of those really long dissolves Takal uses, to show the dissolution of persona and identity


Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


Caitlin FitzGerald and Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


Caitlin FitzGerald and Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


Caitlin FitzGerald in “Always Shine”


Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”


Mackenzie Davis in “Always Shine”

Posted in Directors, Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Review: Cats (2019)

I picked the short straw in being assigned to review Cats … or at least that was how I thought initially. But … I enjoyed Cats. To quote The Irishman, it is what it is. My review at Ebert. This is my final review of 2019. Going out with a meow.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

13 Questions About Books

Anthony McIntyre is a former IRA volunteer who spent 18 years in prison, participating in the blanket protest and other protests which culminated in the hunger strikes of the 1980s. He is a journalist and activist, and a long-standing internet friend of mine, even though I only met him once when he and his wife Carrie (who had been reading and participating on my site for years) opened their home to Allison and I when we visited Belfast. We had such an extraordinary visit! Anthony and Carrie both do very important and sometimes dangerous work in northern Irish politics, and I was happy to participate in an ongoing series on their site The Pensive Quill: Booker’s Dozen. Anthony asked 13 questions about books. I answered. Let’s hear it for Elinor Lipman!

Posted in Books | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Graceland Detail of the Day #6

In the downstairs corridor. Allison and I both said how much we loved this corridor, because it’s so … normal. It’s a home. You never forget that you are walking through a family home.

All pics in this series taken by me, during a tour I took on January 2, 2013. I was alone on the tour. The house was totally quiet and empty. I had time to linger.

Posted in Personal | Tagged | Leave a comment

“‘Santa Claus is coming down your chimney tonight’ sounds absolutely filthy when Elvis sings it.” – Tom Petty

Here is Elvis Presley’s dirty-sex Christmas song, “Santa Claus is Back in Town”, written by the great duo Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller, who wrote many of Elvis’ greatest hits.

The song includes images such as:

Santa abandoning his sleigh for a “big black Cadillac”
Santa demanding that “you” take off your “stockings” for him
Santa snarling about how he will be “coming down your chimney” tonight and you better be ready.

It’s still hard to believe he got away with it. It’s hard to believe this track exists at all.

Elvis recorded the song in 1957 at the ripe old age of 22, and it makes his confidently nasty performance that much more remarkable. In comparison with a lot of the other singers who were his contemporaries – those also on the Sun Records roster, but elsewhere as well – Elvis lived a pretty tame life. Many of the other Southern musicians circulating at that time were practically outlaws, drinking, drugging, womanizing, wild. Many crashed and burned early. Elvis wasn’t that at all. He had tons of sex, of course, but there’s nothing particularly wild about that. He didn’t drink at all. He didn’t like being around people who were drinking. He wasn’t a party-hound. He liked amusement parks and pinball machines. He was a kid, basically. In terms of lifestyle: at 22, or even earlier, at 18, 19, he wasn’t out living a wild juke-joint fire-liquor fast-women kind of life. He lived at home, his Mama wiped his mouth for him at the table (literally), and he drank milkshakes and dated a nice Christian girl named Dixie, and they went roller-skating and attended gospel concerts on their dates. Elvis was a “good boy,” albeit a poor Southern one, the son of sharecroppers.

In other words: he wasn’t raised in a “high-class” religions, where the APPEARANCE of holiness and “good”-ness was paramount, religions where people believed that salvation was possible here on earth if you appeared good. In Elvis’ religion, appearances didn’t matter at all, because everyone was too poor for that SURFACE nonsense. Church was about relief, release, comfort, community, freedom of expression, catharsis, the reassurance that their lives had value, even if the culture de-valued their class. Elvis was raised in the Assembly of God church, and the Pentecostals understood that salvation was not possible on earth, that if you asked for forgiveness sincerely, God would grant it. It was a religion that was – despite the speaking in tongues and all that – quite realistic about the condition of man. Others who know more about this than I do have observed that poor Southern mamas were more realistic about the sex lives of their children than middle-class mothers obsessed with appearances. (June Juanico, Elvis’ girlfriend in 1956, tells a great story about messing around with Elvis in his room in the house he shared with his parents – no sex, but “heavy petting” in the terminology of the day, and suddenly Gladys knocked on the door, saying through the door, “Elvis, honey, we need to make sure June doesn’t have any babies.” Hahahaha. “We.” But Gladys always said, when asked, “He’s a good boy.”).

The point I am trying to make is: Elvis’ powerful sexuality was not in conflict with his good-boy self. Neither ‘side’ was a lie. This is something most East Coast commentators looking on totally missed, or misunderstood. What was really fascinating about Elvis is that when he sang raunchy rhythm & blues, which he did practically from the beginning, he was singing songs that didn’t at all describe his actual life experiences at the time. He was a kid. He didn’t have a woman “way across town” who was good to him, and etc. But he understood the urgency of these songs, he understood everything. Elvis had a huge sex drive, as many teenagers do, and he expressed it in a way that was unafraid. He was unashamed about the existence of his own sex drive. This, in and of itself, was a revolution in the wider culture (then and now) – but to those closer to Elvis’ actual life circumstances – the poor Southerners, the teenagers, etc. – they all “got it.” Of COURSE Elvis was both a good mama’s boy and a total hound-dog. There is no contradiction. Only if you think sex is dirty do you see this as contradictory. He wasn’t a hypocrite, but that’s how a lot of reporters interpreted this duality in Elvis. They didn’t get it. They didn’t put in the time to try to understand it. Elvis was, of course, an anomaly in many MANY ways, a “sui generis” figure, but in other more important ways, he was representative. His teenage audiences got that totally. He is us. Just better looking. And braver.

But let’s go back to “Santa Claus Is Back in Town.” It was the first track on Elvis’ Christmas Album, released in 1957. It is still the greatest-selling Christmas album of all time. By a wide margin.

2s77wub

The album is filled with beautiful and traditional renderings of Christmas classics like “O Little Town of Bethlehem” and “Silent Night”, a couple of gospel favorites like “There Will Be Peace in the Valley”, and the now-classic “Blue Christmas”, with the soprano looping up and down the scales in the background (great interview with said soprano Millie Kirkham here).

You can’t get more traditional than this.

Interestingly enough, “Santa Claus Is Back In Town” was not perceived then as the most controversial number on the album. Elvis covered “White Christmas,” and his version is witty and light, he’s not making fun of it, but he is having fun with it, putting his own spin on it. Irving Berlin, who wrote the song, was, reportedly, not happy with it. At all. The story that he called radio stations across the land demanding that they cease playing it is suspect, in my opinion. But in general, considering Elvis’ notoreity at this time, hearing him singing conventional Christmas carols was shocking. This is hilarious when you consider “Santa Claus Is Back In Town,” the OPENING TRACK of the album – !!! – which even to modern ears is so over-the-top raunchy it still conceivably could be seen as shocking.

The “White Christmas” thing is a great window into the tenor of the times, and how threatening it was when Elvis moved into the mainstream. (And, not coincidentally, the mainstream gobbled him up. Four years later he’d make Blue Hawaii and become an all-American movie star, the opposite of “threatening”. That situation could not and did not last, but this is yet another commentary on not only the times, but how culture works.) There was no escape from Elvis in 1957. Many still thought: Why didn’t he go back to the Swamp-Land from which he sprung? (There was a LOT of regional prejudice in this attitude.)

Elvis got so much bad publicity in 1956 (it had already started to neutralize in 1957, with the Ed Sullivan performances, as well as the movies, which softened his persona). Jukebox owners declared they would not stock their jukeboxes with “N-word music”, DJs smashed his records in public, PTA groups and pastors denounced him as dangerous, the Mayor of Jersey City gave a press conference where he said Elvis would not be welcome in Jersey City. Elvis proclaimed his innocence: he was just doing what the music made him feel, what the music made the audience feel. And “nobody’s getting hurt,” my favorite of his comments on the matter.

But here, in a Christmas album, Elvis almost TAUNTS the critics with “Santa Claus is Back in Town.” It’s heartening: even with all the controversy, and even knowing that the controversy hurt and confused Elvis, he did not back down. He did not cave. Instead, he LEADS OFF the album with a song so sheerly sexual it borders on public indecency. And then for the rest of the album, he buttons it up, sharing his love of Christmas carols, and his adoration of Jesus. BOTH expressions were sincere. (Many saw his Christianity as a cynical marketing ploy. Or, they were turned off by his denomination. There’s a lot of class prejudice in this, as well as regional prejudice.) These critics misunderstood Elvis, misunderstood his culture, his religion.

If you want to hear why Elvis Presley was controversial, don’t listen to “I Got a Woman” (although listen to that, too). Listen to “Santa Claus is Back in Town” and listen, in particular, to what he does with his voice on “You be a real good little girl …”

It is outrageous.

Tom Petty says it better in his Rolling Stone “Top Elvis tracks” piece (unfortunately, the link no longer works!), so I’ll let him take over:

“Santa Claus is coming down your chimney tonight” sounds absolutely filthy when Elvis sings it. It might be his best blues vocal ever, with those beautiful stops that nobody could do but him.

The fact that the song starts with The Jordannaires gentle traditional quartet, singing “Christmaaaaaas….” in a churchy way makes what happens afterwards even more shocking. That opening is a feint, a trick, a fake-out: it makes you think the song will be one thing, and the second Elvis comes in, it turns into something else entirely.

Compare his vocals on that track with images like this one (Elvis loved Christmas), and you can see how destabilizing a figure he really was.

elvis_christmas_tree-x600

Elvis asked you to reconcile the boy who loves Jesus with the boy who cackles like a sexy demon during the bridge of “Santa Claus is Back”. Neither was an act. Both are true.

Can the culture embrace such inclusion and inclusiveness? Shouldn’t ONE side be truer than the other? We are so much more comfortable when only one thing is true at one time.

Elvis says, Both are true.

Can you handle it?

Posted in Music | Tagged | 4 Comments

Graceland Detail of the Day #5

In the Jungle Room.

All pics in this series taken by me, during a tour I took on January 2, 2013. I was alone on the tour. The house was totally quiet and empty. I had time to linger.

Posted in Personal | Tagged | Leave a comment